employer branding: where we are, where we’re … · employer branding: where we are, where...

54
Employer Branding: Where We Are, Where We’re Headed Human Resources Institute of New Zealand Wellington 16 September 05

Upload: duongthuy

Post on 27-Sep-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Employer Branding: Where We Are,

Where We’re Headed

Human Resources Instituteof New Zealand

Wellington16 September 05

What Is “Employer Branding”?

• Let’s start with what it is NOT– Employer Branding is NOT advertising

• Advertising may or may not be a component of employer branding

– Employer Branding is NOT a corporate mission statement, nor a tag line, nor a slogan

• All of these must reflect the employer brand,but they are not the brand itself

– Employer Branding is NOT something you create• It is something you discover or reveal; the employer

brand already exists— you just have to find it

WHEREWE ARE

Employer Branding Is About Relationships

• The relationship between an employer and employees…– Current– Past– Potential

• The relationship between employees and…– Each other– Customers– Stakeholders

• Investors / analysts• Suppliers / vendors• Community leaders

WHEREWE ARE

ADVERTISINGLOGO

COLLATERAL

SIGNAGE & ENVIRONMENTWEB PORTAL

BRAND VISIONBRAND VISION

BUSINESS PROCESSES

INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS

TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT

QUALITY ASSURANCE

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT

COMPENSATION & BENEFITS

CUSTOMER RELATIONS

RECRUITMENT & RETENTION

WHEREWE ARE

Why Is Employer Branding Important?

• Determines ability to deliver on corporate brand• Affects ability to attract, retain talent

– Better known / regarded employers have an easier time attracting top talent

– Better known / regarded employers keep talent– Reduces cost-per-hire, time-to-fill, turnover

WHEREWE ARE

Nations AreBrands

10. New Zealand

WHEREWE ARE

U.S. Workforce Trends

Source: U.S. Dept. of Defense

WHEREWE ARE

New Zealand Workforce Trends

• Working age population growth fell to its lowest point since 2001— 1.3%— in June 2005

• Net inflow of permanent / long-term migrants fell to 8,600 p.a. in June 2005, far below the three year average of 32,400 p.a. Preliminary figures for July show a net outflow, the first since 2001

• New Zealand’s jobless rate of 3.7% is the lowest among the 27 nations in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development

WHEREWE ARE

Net Permanent / Long-Term MigrationWHEREWE ARE

10 June 2005

Unemployment Rate Historically LowWHEREWE ARE

12 August 2005

Labour Shortage Means Wage InflationWHEREWE ARE

09 August 2005

Changing Psychographics

The “Emerging Worker”– began with Gen X (1964 – 77); bled up into

Baby Boomers, down to Millennials • mistrusts employers – no loyalty• “job security” = “marketability”• willing to wait for a good fit

versus taking any job to get income

– brand-oriented due to media overexposure• 2,500 – 25,000 commercial messages DAILY• human brain has re-wired itself

to recognize brands• brands used as guideposts in media jungle

WHEREWE ARE

“We live in a world todaythat is one giant commercial, and

the customer by and large does notbelieve the message anyway. I would

submit that there is a lack of trustabout public institutions...

More than ever before, people want to have a relationshipwith a company, and a company is

represented by its people.”

Howard SchultzChairman and CEO

Starbucks Coffee Co.March, 2000

WHEREWE ARE

What Relationship Exists BetweenCorporate Brand and Employer Brand?

• Millward-Brown 2001 BRANDZ™ Survey– 35,600 people surveyed in 16 countries– Survey examined 18 indices of brand– 1,317 brands

• McDonald’s • Bank of America • Nokia • Nordstrom• Wal*Mart • Mercedes-Benz

• Employers with strong brands are seen as good places to work

• Employers with weak or unfamiliar brands must use recruitment communications to build the brand

WHEREWE ARE

The Brand Pyramid

Source: Walshe, Peter and Natalie Purdie, “‘I like your company– gi’ us a job!’: Evaluating the Assetsof Your Company” (London: Millward Brown, March, 2002)

WHEREWE ARE

Impact of Brand onEmployer Preference

Source: Ibid.

WHEREWE ARE

Generalized Impact of Brandon Employer Preference

Source: Ibid.

WHEREWE ARE

Likelihood of Voluntary Turnover

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

ExtremelyLikely

SomewhatLikely

SomewhatUnlikely

ExtremelyUnlikely

HR ProsEmployees

Source: Collison, Jessica and Mary Elizabeth Burke, “Job Recovery Survey” (Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management, Sept. 2003)

WHEREWE ARE

Reasons PeopleWill Leave

• Better comp / bene 63%• Career dev 35%• New experience 32%• Job security fears 21%• Career change 21%• Poor management 20%• Boredom 18%• Values 18%• Move 16%• Burnout 15%

• Unappreciated 14%• Work / Life Issues 12%• Discrimination 8%• Hvy workload 7%• Start own business 6%• Conflict w/ supv 6%• Return to school 5%• Viability of org 4%• Other 13%

Source: Collison

WHEREWE ARE

The Economist GlobalEmployment Brand Survey

• Panel of readers who agreed to complete series of surveys on behalf of The Economist’s advertising clients

• Only panel members with specific job titles (‘c suite’ or heads of department) sampled

• Questionnaires distributed by e-mail 24th April 2003 to 1,745 panel members

• 937 completed questionnaires returned by 21st May - 54% response rate

• Panel of readers who agreed to complete series of surveys on behalf of The Economist’s advertising clients

• Only panel members with specific job titles (‘c suite’ or heads of department) sampled

• Questionnaires distributed by e-mail 24th April 2003 to 1,745 panel members

• 937 completed questionnaires returned by 21st May - 54% response rate

WHEREWE ARE

Continental Europe

13%USA29%

Asia-Pacific16%

UK42%

Profile of respondents

Manufacturing16%

Retail/Dist.4%

Financial17%

Professions8%

Other7%

Mktg, media & other bus.

15%

Mgmt Cons.12%

Government2%

IT/Telecoms16%

Transport3%

MD/Vice Pres.15%

Director/Gen Mgr/Co. Officer

19%

Owner/Partner22%

Mgr/Dept Head33%

Chairman/ Pres/CEO

11%

Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003 Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003

HR = part of job function

53%

HR not part of job43%

HR = main part of job function

4%

WHEREWE ARE

“Employer branding is too much of an important issueto be left solely to a HR dept” Agree?

Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003

20%

44%

38%

59%

44%

51% 10%

10%

18%

1%

2%

3%HR is main part ofmy job function

HR is part of myjob function

HR not part of myjob function

Agree strongly Agree Disagree Disagree strongly

WHEREWE ARE

Responsibility for Day-to-dayManagement of Employer Brand

Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003 Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003

21%

15%

8%

7%

4%

8%

11%

5%

5%

13%

3%

Nobody specific

CEO/MD

Board/Snr Mgmt

Partners/Owners

Middle mgmt

HR & bus. heads

HR dept/head

Marketing dept

PR/Corp Com dept

Other

No answer

WHEREWE ARE

Anticipated Cost of Full-scaleEmployer Brand Development

Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003US Dollars

Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003US Dollars

$164,000

$160,000

$151,000

$140,000

USA

Cont. Europe

Asia-Pacific

UK

WHEREWE ARE

51%

56%

50%

54%

76%

70%

70%

74%

38%

32%

29%

43%

36%

72%

61%

71%

71%

67%

58%

58%

55%

39%

34%

29%UK

USA

ContinentalEurope

Asia-Pacific

Reduced recruitment costs

Higher staff retention

Employees recommending org asplace to work

Employees committed toorganisational goals

Enhanced general marketingcommunications

Increased profitability

Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003 Base: all respondents (933)The Economist, May 2003

Expected benefits ofdevelopment of employer brand WHERE

WE ARE

Where We’re HeadedWhere We’re Headed

Ph

oto

©D

om

inic

Ari

zon

a B

on

ucc

elli

Employment BrandingUsing the Web

Relationship Marketing

Alumni Marketing

Chat / Forums / Blogs

Job Agent | Profiling

Employment Branding Using the Webvs. Traditional Web Recruiting

• Your site is the destination– All media, promotions, PR, etc., point to your site– Goal: create and nurture a relationship with visitors

• You own the audience– People who want to work for your organization,

vs. people who simply want a job– You can sustain interest even when the prospect

isn’t actively looking• Relationship marketing – newsletters, job alerts, referral

bonus offers, etc.• Alumni marketing – boomerang employees, networking• Forums / chats – build communities to which people feel

kinship

WHEREWE’REHEADED

craiglist

Craigslist - auckland

oodle

Oodle results

google

Google results

Search Engine Optimization (SEO)

• Configuring Your Employment Web Siteto Be More Visible to Search Engines

– Content tailored to appear to search engine“spiders” that “crawl” the Web

– Establish greater number of inbound linksfrom other Web sites

– Notify search engines of your existence(e.g., DMOZ)

– Provide fresh content, a site map, and judicioususe of keywords people will use to search

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Search Engine Marketing (SEM)

• Marketing Your Web Site Using Search Engines– Paid search results– Pay-per-click (PPC)

• Fee-based• Auction-based

– Research into How People Search• What words they use• Which search engine(s) they use

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Simply hired

Simply hired results

indeed

Indeed results

rss

Really Simple Syndication (RSS)

• Syndicating Web Site Content– Content is fed automatically to subscribers– Underlying technology of blogs– Job seekers can “subscribe” to their job,

receive updates every time a new opening posts

• XML Based– eXtensible Mark-up Language, successor

to HTML– Disputes about standard

• 0.7, 1.0, 2.0 versions in release independently

• NB: The New York Times Bought 30% of indeed.com for US$3.5M

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Blogs

• Web Logs Published by Individuals(“online journals”)

– Phrase originated 1999; adopted by OED in 2003

• Social Impact Widespread– Kryptonite bicycle lock recall– Politics: Trent Lott, Dan Rather– Employment: Microsoft gay partners policy

• Blog Sites Popular– Blogger, Xanga, GreatestJournal

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Blog Implications for Employer Branding

• Your Employees May Rat You Out!– You must “walk the talk” of your employment

brand lest your employees reveal hypocrisy

• You May Not Be Able to Stop Blogs– Employees can blog without your knowledge or

assistance– U.S. employers have fired employees who wrote

negative blogs; result: negative P.R.

• Encouraging Blogs Is Strategically Smart– Shows organization has “nothing to hide”– More credible than paid advertising, P.R.

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Google blog

Microsoft blog

Peer-to-Peer Networks

• Same Technology as Napster, LinkedIn– People join a community and agree to share…

• Content • Music• Contacts

• Jobster Allows Employers to Network toTop Talent Through Existing Employees

jobster

How Do You Start Buildingand Maintaining Your Employer Brand?

• Start with the Status Quo– What is the reputation of the

organization as an employer?– How well known is your organization?– What’s working? What isn’t?– What helps your employees deliver your brand

to your customers? What gets in their way?– Are your compensation and benefits programs

aligned with your brand?

• What do people outside of your organizationthink of you as an employer?

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Establish a Goal

• What do you want your organizationto be as an employer?– High performance?– High touch?– Resume Star?– Learning organization?

• What are the gaps between whereyou want to be and where you are?

• What specific steps do you need to taketo get from where you are to where youwant to be?

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Plan Your Communications

• Don’t say anything untilyou have something to say

• Plan your internal communicationsone year in advance– Important communications – 9x– Routine communications – 3x

• Recruitment communications– Be authentic– Be relevant– Be different

WHEREWE’REHEADED

The Big Question

• How Much Will It Cost?• The Economist - $164,000 avg. (US)

– For every employer that spends $300,000there’s one that spends $25,000

• How Strong Is Your Corporate Brand?– If your organization is well-known and

well-respected, leverage that brand equity– If your organization is not well-known or

has image problems, you will have to spend more

WHEREWE’REHEADED

Thank You!Questions

D. Mark HornungSr VP Strategy and Branding

Bernard HODES [email protected]