empathy vs sympathy. integrated campaigns conference, 25 february 2016

20
bond.org.uk Empathy vs Sympathy Do communications that draw on pity undermine long-term engagement? 25 February 2016

Upload: charitycomms

Post on 21-Apr-2017

1.478 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk

Empathy vs Sympathy

Do communications that draw on pity

undermine long-term engagement?

25 February 2016

Page 2: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 2

Three BIG barriers to public support

CYNICISM DISTANCE FUTILITY

There is widespread

agreement among

the public that there

has been no

progress in

developing countries.

Most people do not

have any connection

(and little empathy)

with the world’s

poorest people.

Very few believe

that their actions

can have any

impact on these

problems.

Page 3: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 3

Page 4: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 4

Page 5: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 5

Page 7: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 7

A Comprehensive Approach

AnalysisPerception

shifts

Advocacy

actions

Propensity to

donate

Post-

researchCreate the

narrative

Market Test

Sector

Adoption

Quantitative1200

person online

interviews

per country

Engaged Public

sample

Qualitative

Focus groups

with stimulus

Pre-

researchAudit existing

research

Create

arguments

to test

The primary objective was to learn something new about

how to

change public attitudes – rather than greater

understanding of existing attitudes.

Page 8: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 8

Audience Insight

The Engaged Public in the UK represents less than

a third of the population

Page 9: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 9

Engaged Audience Breakdown

Supporters (41%)

• Take an active interest

in global development

• Positive about

achievements

• Well educated and

liberal

• Have taken action on

the issues

• Consume a lot of news

media

Swings (47%)

• Undecided – they

question what is being

achieved in development

• Some are overwhelmed

by the issues facing

people in poorer

countries

• Would consider taking

action but unsure about

how they can help

• Slightly younger than

Supporters

Sceptics (12%)

• Sceptical about

development

• Economically rather

than emotionally

driven

• Older

• More small ‘c’

conservative in their

views

Page 10: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 10

The Opportunity

Within the Engaged Public we can potentially

double our base of support

Page 11: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 11

Page 12: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 12

The Narrative Approach

Page 13: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 13

Narrative Project in Practice

Page 14: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 14

Key Findings

• No difference in average

donation across treatments

• Respondents spent more

time looking at empathy

appeal

• The appeals produced

significantly different

emotional responses,

which affects outcomes

“I would give to the

Future Doctor

campaign. Simply

because it’s

offering a vision of a

potential bright future.

The 2nd campaign is

harrowing but it could be

seen as a lost cause.”

Steve, 41, On the Fence

Page 15: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 15

Restless Development

Page 16: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 16

Summary

1. Values vs Facts

2. Empathy vs Sympathy

3. Reframing ‘need’

Page 17: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 17

Discussion – in small groups

• What are the key learnings from the Narrative

Project that you could apply to your organisation

or issue?

• What are the main challenges, barriers and

questions?

Page 18: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

bond.org.uk 18

Thank you

www.bond.org.uk/public-support

Alice Delemare, campaign adviser

@alice_delemare

Julius Honnor, digital manager

@juliushonnor

Regent’s Wharf • 8 All Saints Street • London • N1 9RL • United Kingdom

+44 (0)20 7837 8344 • [email protected] • bond.org.uk

Page 19: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

Visit the CharityComms website to

view slides from past events, see

what events we have coming up

and to check out what else we do:

www.charitycomms.org.uk

Page 20: Empathy vs sympathy. Integrated campaigns conference, 25 February 2016

Conference

25 February 2016

London

#integratedcomms

Integrated campaigns:

planning, delivering and

evaluating

Sponsored by

@goodagencyldn