emissions trading and climate change: what’s happening in...
TRANSCRIPT
Emissions Trading and Climate Change: What’s Happening in the U.S.
Emissions Trading and Climate Change: What’s Happening in the U.S.
Green WeekJune 13, 2007
Vicki ArroyoDirector of Policy Analysis
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
Green WeekJune 13, 2007
Vicki ArroyoDirector of Policy Analysis
Pew Center on Global Climate Change
2
Pew Center on Global Climate ChangePew Center on Global Climate Change
• Founded in May 1998• Independent, non-profit, non-partisan• Divided into five major program areas:
• Scientific Studies/Analyses• Domestic and International Strategies• Outreach Activities
• Business• States
• Solutions• Communications
3
Selected Pew ReportsSelected Pew Reports
4
43 BELC Companies43 BELC Companies
5
Increased Media AttentionIncreased Media Attention
6
ABC NEWS/STANFORD UNIVERSITY POLL (4/2007)
Public Opinion
Views of Global Warming: Then & Now1998 2006 2007
Think it’s probably happening 80% 85% 84%Personally see it as very/extremely important 31 49 52
Know at least a moderate amount about it 44 58 62
Think U.S. government should do more about it -- 68 70
Think scientists disagree about it 67 64 56
7
State GHG ReportingState GHG Reporting
Independent Voluntary Registries
The Climate Registry Independent Mandatory Reporting
8
State GHG Emission TargetsState GHG Emission Targets
State Near- to Mid-Term Targets
OR: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020
NM: 10% below 2000
levels by 2020
CA: 1990 levels by
2020
NY: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020
CT: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020RI: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020
ME: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020
VT: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020
MA: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020NH: 10% below 1990 levels by 2020
AZ: 2000 levels by 2020
WA: 1990 levels by 2020
IL: 1990 levels by 2020
NJ: 1990 levels by 2020
MN: 15% below 2005 levels by 2015
9
Regional InitiativesRegional Initiatives
State Near- to Mid-Term Targets
10
State Programs: RGGIState Programs: RGGI
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative• Regional cap-and-trade • Initiated 2003 by NY Gov. Pataki• CO2 emissions from power plants• Cap
– Current levels between 2009 and 2015– 10% reduction below current levels by 2019
• Standardized approach to offsets• Safety valve expands scope of offsets• Model rule (template) announced August 2006• Each state must adopt final model rule through
legislation or regulation by Dec. 31, 2008
11
State Programs: CaliforniaState Programs: California
• Governor Schwarzenegger targets– 2000 levels by 2010– 1990 levels by 2020– 80% below current emissions by 2050
• California Public Utilities Commission GHG cap on regulated utilities
• Nunez-Pavley AB 32: Global Warming Solutions Act– Set California’s targets at 1990 levels by 2020– First enforceable state-wide program to cap major industrial GHG
emissions and include penalties– Authorizes market-based mechanisms (cap-and-trade); allows one-
year extension on targets– Possible linking with RGGI, EU-ETS
• Low Carbon Fuels Standard (reduce carbon intensity of vehicle fuels sold in California at least 10% by 2020)
• Renewable Portfolio Standard (20% by 2010)
12
• No Kyoto• More research• GHG intensity target• Voluntary reporting• Long-term technology development
(but no plan for deployment)
Bush Climate PolicyBush Climate Policy
13
U.S. GHG Emissions 1990-2005U.S. GHG Emissions 1990-2005
5,500
5,700
5,900
6,100
6,300
6,500
6,700
6,900
7,100
7,300
7,50019
90
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Year
MM
T C
O 2e
Source: US EPA
14
U.S. GHG Emissions 1990-2005U.S. GHG Emissions 1990-2005
5,500
5,700
5,900
6,100
6,300
6,500
6,700
6,900
7,100
7,300
7,50019
90
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Year
MM
T C
O 2e
Source: US EPA
15
Choice of Baseline MattersChoice of Baseline Matters
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%
1971
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Year
% In
crea
se in
Em
issi
ons
US EmissionsEU-15 Emissions
Source: IEA
Emissions growth since…
16
Emissions and Economic GrowthEmissions and Economic Growth
17
Agenda for Climate ActionAgenda for Climate Action
• 15 recommendations in 6 key areas:– Science and technology– Emissions markets– Sectoral reductions– Energy supply and use– Adaptation– International engagement
• Released February 8, 2006 at National Press Club– 6 companies spoke on need for federal policy
• Briefings for Administration, Hill, key sectors
18
US CAP PartnershipUS CAP Partnership
19
US CAP RecommendationsUS CAP Recommendations
• Targets– Between 100-105% of today’s levels within five years– 90-100% of today’s levels within 10 years– 70-90% of today’s levels within 15 years. – Goal of 60-80% reduction by 2050 (atmospheric
concentrations of 450-550 ppm)• Economy-wide cap-and-trade system is essential to create
market price signal for GHGs
• Additional policies/measures where price signal alone is not sufficient– Transportation– Power generation– Buildings and energy efficiency
• Technology research, development, demonstration, and deployment
• Need for renewed U.S. leadership in international efforts
20
Congressional ActivityCongressional Activity
Electricity Sector Legislation in the 110th Congress
Senate
• Feinstein-Carper: includes all GHGs, some offsets, funds for tech R&D. 25% below 1990 in 2050.
• Alexander-Lieberman: 4P bill, some offsets, standards for new power plants. 17% below 1990 CO2 level by 2025.
• Carper: 4P bill, some offsets, funds for tech R&D. 25% below 1990 CO2level in 2050.
• Sanders: 4P bill, funds for tech R&D. 17% below 1990 CO2 level by 2025 (if no economy-wide GHG bill passed by 2012, further 3%/year reduction in electricity CO2 emissions).
21
Congressional ActivityCongressional Activity
Economy-wide Legislation in the 110th Congress
Senate• Lieberman-McCain: offsets, technology title. 60% below 1990 in 2050.• Sanders-Boxer: cap & trade permitted but not required, offsets not
specified, other sectoral standards. 80% below 1990 in 2050.• Kerry-Snowe: offsets and cost-control not specified, other sectoral
standards, funds for tech R&D. 62% below 1990 in 2050.• Bingaman (not introduced): intensity-based growth target, $7/ton CO2
safety valve—emissions continue to rise. (Expected to be amended per new NCEP proposal)
House• Olver-Gilchrest: offsets, 70% below 1990 in 2050.• Waxman: cap & trade permitted but not required, offsets not specified,
other sectoral standards. 80% below 1990 in 2050.
22
Economy-wide Bill TargetsIntroduced in 110th Congress as of May 2007
0
5000
10000
15000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Year
Em
issi
on
s (M
Mt
CO
2e
)
Historical U.S. emissionsBusiness-as-usual projectionLieberman-McCainBingaman*Kerry-SnoweSanders-Boxer / WaxmanOlver-Gilchrest
Congressional Bill TargetsCongressional Bill Targets
* Not introduced and may change per new NCEP proposal
1990 Baseline
23
For More InformationFor More Information
Vicki ArroyoDirector of Policy Analysis
Pew Center on Global Climate [email protected]
www.pewclimate.org