emergency motion to enjoin fraudulent pretenses of "judicial immunity", doc. # 29

8/9/2019 Emergency Motion to Enjoin Fraudulent Pretenses of "judicial Immunity", Doc. # 29

1/16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDAFORT MYERS DIVISION

DR. JORG BUSSE, JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-CV-0089-FtM-JES-SPC

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL; ROGER ALEJO;

KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JACK N. PETERSON; GERALD BARD TJOFLAT;RICHARD JESSUP; CIRCUIT JUDGE BIRCH; CIRCUIT JUDGE DUBINA;

RICHARD ALLAN LAZZARA; CHARLIE CRIST; LEE COUNTY VALUE

ADJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; EXECUTIVE TITLE CO.;JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.,

Defendants.

EMERGENCY MOTION

____________________________________________________________________________/

EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF

JUDICIAL IMMUNITY, DOC. # 29, 06/30/10

RECORD EMERGENCIES OF CORRUPTION, FRAUD, AND BRIBERY

1. The judicial and Government corruption, fraud, bribery, and extortion on record were

EMERGENCIES, because they violently injured the American people.

THE U.S. DEFENDANTS FRAUDULENTLY PRETENDED absolute immunity

CORRUPTION WAS OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF ANY JUDICIALIMMUNITY

2. The Rules and public policy prohibited the judicial corruption, fraud, bribery, and extortion

on the record as conclusively evidenced in Plaintiffs multiple State and Federal law suits

since 2006. Judicial corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion were outside the scope of any

judicial immunity.

PLAINTIFFS SUED CORRUPT U.S. OFFICIALS IN THEIR PRIVATE CAPACITIES


2/16

2

3. Because the record corruption, bribery, fraud, and extortion by the Defendant U.S. Judges

and Officials were outside the scope of any lawfuljudicial and/or governmental activity, the

Plaintiffs expressly sued the Defendant corrupt Judges in theirindividual private capacities.

4. Here, public policy demanded criminal investigation and prosecution of the Defendant

crooked U.S. Judges for their crimes on the public record.

5. Here, U.S. Officials refused to investigate and prosecute the Defendant corrupt Judges and

Officials for the criminal purposes of concealing said record crimes. Here, public policy had

absolutely required equalprosecution. Here, judges were no differentfrom any other citizen.

EMERGENCY OF PRIMA FACIE FRAUDULENT MOTION, DOC. # 29, 06/30/10

6. In Document 29, 06/30/10, the United States of America, by and through its Defendant

undersigned attorneys, and including Defendant Matthew Fesak, fraudulently pretended that

Plaintiffs proof and allegations of, e.g., corruption, extortion, bribery, and fraud were

barred by absolute immunity, Doc. # 29, p. 1.

7. Said prima facie false pretenses were absurd as easily illustrated and explained by the fact

that judges were and are of course not immune from, e.g., murder or other crimes outside

the judicial scope.

U.S. FRIVOLITY & VEXATIOUSNESS SCAMS AND COVER-UP

8. Just like, e.g., Nazi Judges in Nazi Germany were not immune from prosecution, the

Defendant Nazi-style Officials in these Government corruption Cases had to defend against

their crimes on the public record. Cover-up was not any option. Idiotically blurting out

frivolity and vexatiousness was not any option under the rule of law.


3/16

3

THE PLAINTIFFS WERE ABSOLUTELY ENTITLED TO RELIEF

9. Here of course, the Plaintiffs were entitled to, e.g., equitable relief. Here, said Defendants

ignorance and arrogance were injurious. Here, the Plaintiffs were entitled to defend against

Government extortion and fraud scheme O.R. 569/875.

DEFENDANTS EXTORTED UNDER COLOR OF FACIALLY FAKE O.R. 569/875

10. Here, said Defendants extorted and conspired to extort property and fees under fraudulent

pretenses and color ofauthority, office, and/or fake resolution O.R. 569/875.

DEFENDANTS IDIOTICALLY CONCOCTED LAW [O.R. 569/875]

11. Defendants prima facie unrecognized concoction and/or defense of legislative

condemnation [O.R. 569/875] was an idiotic crime. Here, no fit and intelligent judge

could havepossibly concocted such judicial trash, because any and all involuntary alienation

of property would have been exclusively a judicial function. Here, no court judgment/order

had everexisted, and no law was everadoptedby anyone.

NO immunity FROM GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION & EXTORTION

12. EXTORTION has been defined as

"the obtaining of property from another induced by wrongful use of actual or

threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right."

See Black'sLaw Dictionary."the unlawful exaction of money or property through intimidation."

See Encyclopedia Britannica.

13. Here, Defendants and Defendant Government Officials conspired to fraudulently interact,

defraud, deliberately deprive, bribe Officials, and extort property and fees from the Plaintiffs

under color of, e.g., authority, office, and official right. Here, no Government ever had any

official right or authority to claim any lands. Here, Defendant Officials and Judges


4/16

4

fraudulently concealed the prima facie criminality and nullity of said Government scam

O.R. 569/875.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs again demand

1. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining the Defendant Officials, Judges, U.S. Attorneys, and

other Officials on the record from fraudulently pretending immunity, because corruption,

bribery, fraud, and extortion under facially false pretenses of scandalous scam O.R.

569/875 were outside any Government and/or judicial scope of lawful activity;


other Officials on the record from the absurd pretenses of immunity, because of course the

corruption and Government crimes on the record demanded equal prosecution and

investigation of the Defendant Officials and Judges under the Rules and public policy;


other Officials from corruptly concocting frivolity and vexatiousness for criminal

purposes of extending prima facie fraud and extortion scheme O.R. 569/875 and

concealing the criminality and nullity of said scam and scandal;

4. An EMERGENCY Orderfor the removal of prima facie scam O.R. 569/875 from the

public record;

5. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell from concealing Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of Lot 15A, Parcel #

12-44-20-01-00015.015A, as affirmed and conclusively proven by the public record;

6. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant corrupt presiding Judge Charlene E.

Honeywell from maliciously perverting the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record


5/16

5

ownership by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th

Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of

Florida, et al., 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);

14. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked presiding Judge Honeywell,

because she disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants,

perverted the facts of record, and could notpossibly be trusted to be impartialand fair, 28

U.S.C. 455; 18 U.S.C. 241, 242 (see Doc. # 213, 2:2009-cv-00791).

__________________________________

/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro se

P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295

_______________________________________/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.

Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro se

State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;

[email protected]


6/16

6

Defendant Crooked OfficialsReal Estate Fraud Scheme

Fake lot and block numbers such as, e.g.:

o 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0;o 07-44-21-01-00001.0000;

Neither fake lot 00A0 nor block

00001ever existed.

Fake Government ownership claims;

Fake transaction(s) such as, e.g., O.R.

569/875;

Fake resolution and law claims;

Fake land parcels;

Fake frivolity defenses;

Fake vexatiousness contentions;

Fake legal descriptions:


7/16

7


8/16

8


9/16


10/16

SECTION 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its

adoption.

The foregoing Resolution was offered by Commissioner____________, who

moved its adoption. The motion was seconded by Commissioner _____________ and,

being put to a vote, the vote was as follows:

ROBERT P. JANES

BRIAN BIGELOW

RAY JUDAH

TAMMARA HALL

FRANK MANN

DULY ADOPTED this 29th day of April, 2009.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSOF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

(SEAL)

By:Chairman

ATTEST:

Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM ANDLEGAL SUFFICIENCY

County Attorney


11/16

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276 Filed 12/03/07 Page 14 of 18


12/16

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 5 of 10


13/16

Case 2:07-cv-00228-JES-SPC Document 276-2 Filed 12/03/07 Page 7 of 10


14/16

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frrlmChUoVs&feature=player_embedded#!

JACK N. PETERSONIMAGES OF A FRAUDSTER


15/16



16/16


emergency motion to enjoin fraudulent pretenses of "judicial immunity", doc. # 29

Documents