emergency management planning new york style
DESCRIPTION
Emergency Management Planning New York Style. MaryAnn E. Marrocolo Assistant Commissioner Planning and Preparedness New York City Office of Emergency Management. What have we learned? What does this mean for emergency planning? Creating Plans to Facilitate Execution and Action In Summary…. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
MaryAnn E. MarrocoloAssistant Commissioner Planning and PreparednessNew York City Office of Emergency Management
Emergency Management PlanningNew York Style
![Page 2: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
What have we learned?
What does this mean for emergency planning?
Creating Plans to Facilitate Execution and Action
In Summary…
![Page 3: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
What have we learned?
![Page 4: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Question
Comparing major urban centers and small town/rural areas, there are more similarities than differences in emergency preparedness.
a. True
b. False
![Page 5: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Hurricane Andrew
Inadequate communication between levels of government concerning specific needs
Lack of full awareness of supply inventories and agency capabilities
Failure to have a single person in charge with a clear chain of command
Inability to cut through bureaucratic red tape
![Page 6: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Oklahoma City Bombing
The IEMS and ICS weakened early due to:
– Immediate response of numerous local, state, and federal agencies
– Three separate locations of the Incident Command Post
– Deployment of many Mobile Command Posts, representing support agencies
Lack of knowledge of IEMS, disaster response/ recovery planning and implementation, and emergency management functions
![Page 7: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
9/11 Initial Response
Response operation lacked integrated communications and unified command, both within and among individual responding agencies
Crucial information for informed decision-making was not shared among agencies.
![Page 8: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
2004-2005 Sonoma County Grand Jury Report
Written plans and checklists are not consistent among county, cities, agencies, and departments
In some cases written plans are non-existent.
The spasmodic use of checklists misses a great opportunity to put effective planning into action at times of great personal stress and confusion.
Most senior management and elected officials interviewed were distanced from, and in some cases ignorant of, salient pieces of the plans.
![Page 9: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Hurricane Katrina
Command and Control was impaired at all levels of government
Failure to heed past lessons learned from exercises and actual events
Leaders were not well versed in protocol and failed to successfully implement the National Response Plan, and with it, NIMS
![Page 10: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Question
In my experience, the most important of the following factors which leads to an inadequate response is:
a. Lack of clarity of who is in charge
b. Confusion about roles and responsibilities
c. People’s failure to follow the plan
d. Poor communication with “end users”
![Page 11: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Have we learned anything at all?
It is unclear who is in charge or what their job is.– Roles and responsibilities
are confused.
People do not execute the plan.
WHY? Our plans fail to
communicate to the “end user” what is to be done.
![Page 12: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What does this mean for emergency planning?
![Page 13: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Re-thinking the Traditional
Emergency planning guidance is antiquated and does not meet the needs of modern emergency response.
– SLG 101 was last updated in 1996 and made no structural changes to its predecessor CPG 1-8 (1990).
Increasingly complex emergencies require plans that clearly articulate:
– Roles and responsibilities
– Response options
– Actions and tasks
![Page 14: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Moving from Concept to Action
Action & Execution
Options
Roles
Tasks
![Page 15: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Creating Plans to Facilitate Execution and Action
![Page 16: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Plan Simplification
![Page 17: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Plan Simplification (cont.)
![Page 18: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
A Format that Clearly Answers…
Who?
What?
When?
Where?
How?
![Page 19: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A Format that Links Options and Tasks to Operational Phases
Operational Overview
CIMS Phases of an Incident
– Activation and implementation
– Investigative operations
– Life safety operations
– Recovery and restoration operations
![Page 20: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Case Study: Transit Strike
![Page 21: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
A Format that Relates Options to Tasks
Operational Strategies
Connective tissue for options and tasks
![Page 22: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Case Study: Transit Strike (cont.)
![Page 23: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
A Format that Relates Roles to Tasks
Agency Operations
Field Operations
ESF Operations
OEM Operations
Exec OperationsLevel of Detail
![Page 24: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Case Study: Transit Strike (cont.)
![Page 25: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Case Study: Transit Strike (cont.)
![Page 26: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Question
In my jurisdiction, we have simplified our public health response plan into practical checklists for the end users.
a. True
b. False
![Page 27: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Case Study: Transit Strike (cont.)
![Page 28: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Case Study: Transit Strike (cont.)
![Page 29: Emergency Management Planning New York Style](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062400/56814d20550346895dba565c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
In Summary…
Don’t learn the same lesson twice.
Don’t forget the end user… it’s not you.
Don’t forget to link options, roles, and tasks.