elmer is not c2 ready… r u?
DESCRIPTION
Elmer is not C2 Ready… R U?. The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake. R U C2 Ready? 2012 FCAT/School Grade Data. School Grade. 2011-2012. School Grade Comparison. * Eight school grades still pending. School Grade Ranges. A = 525+ B = 495-524 C = 435-494 D = 395-434 F = 394 or less - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Elmer is not C2 Ready…R U?
R U C2 Ready?2012 FCAT/School Grade Data
The Villages Elementary of Lady Lake
2011-2012
School Grade
School Grade Comparison
School Grade
Number of Schools by Year
2011 Projected by
FLDOE inFebruary
2012
2012 *
A 21 10 18B 15 9 13C 6 21 5D 1 2 1F 1 2 0* Eight school grades still pending
School Grade RangesA = 525+B = 495-524C = 435-494D = 395-434F = 394 or less
Villages = 548
School Grade SY12
Reading Math Writing Science
Meeting High Standards
100 100 100 100
Annual Learning Gains 100 100 Total: 800Lowest Quartile Gains 100 100 AGrade:
School Grade SY12 – Performance
Reading Math Writing Science
Meeting High Standards
100 100 100 100
Annual Learning Gains 100 100 Total: 800Lowest Quartile Gains 100 100 AGrade:
School Grade SY12 – Gains
Reading Math Writing Science
Meeting High Standards
100 100 100 100
Annual Learning Gains 100 100 Total: 800Lowest Quartile Gains 100 100 AGrade:
School Grade RangesA = 525+B = 495-524C = 435-494D = 395-434F = 394 or less
School Grade SY12
Reading Math Writing Science
Meeting High Standards
67(-20) 72(-14) 80(-6) 62(-5)
Annual Learning Gains 61(-16) 75(E) Total: 548Lowest Quartile Gains 62(+2) 69(-1)
(-60)
AGrade:
School Grades SY12New, tougher test – FCAT 2.0:
Summer, 2011Raised cut scores: December, 2011Changed school grade calculations
to include ALL students (SWD, and ELL): February 2012
School Grade SY12
Reading Math Writing Science
Meeting High Standards
67(-20) 72(-14) 80(-6) 62(-5)
Annual Learning Gains 61(-16) 75(E) Total: 548Lowest Quartile Gains 62(+2) 69(-1)
(-60)
AGrade:
2011-2012
FCAT Scores – District and State Comparison
Grade 3 Comparison to District and State Averages - ReadingMean Scale Score:
Villages – 203Lake – 201Florida – 201
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 65%Lake – 56%Florida – 56%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 13%Lake – 17%Florida – 18%
Grade 3 Comparison to District and State Averages - MathMean Scale Score:
Villages – 207Lake – 201Florida – 202
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 68%Lake – 56%Florida – 58%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 15%Lake – 18%Florida – 18%
Grade 4 Comparison to District and State Averages - ReadingMean Scale Score:
Villages – 215Lake – 213Florida – 213
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 65%Lake – 61%Florida – 62%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 8%Lake – 12%Florida – 13%
Grade 4 Comparison to District and State Averages - MathMean Scale Score:
Villages – 220Lake – 214Florida – 215
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 71%Lake – 60%Florida – 60%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 15%Lake – 18%Florida – 18%
Grade 5 Comparison to District and State Averages - ReadingMean Scale Score:
Villages – 223Lake – 220Florida – 221
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 65%Lake – 60%Florida – 61%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 12%Lake – 15%Florida – 15%
Grade 5 Comparison to District and State Averages - MathMean Scale Score:
Villages – 229Lake – 221Florida – 222
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 71%Lake – 55%Florida – 57%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 12%Lake – 19%Florida – 19%
Grade 5 Comparison to District and State Averages - ScienceMean Scale Score:
Villages – 335Lake – 321Florida – 322
% Scoring Levels 3-5:Villages – 60%Lake – 49%Florida – 51%
% Scoring Level 1:Villages – 12%Lake – 19%Florida – 20%
Grade 4 Comparison to District and State Averages - WritingAverage Score
Villages – 3.2Lake – 3.2Florida – 3.3
% Scoring Level 3 and UpVillages – 78%Lake – 79%Florida – 81%
% Scoring Level 3.5 and UpVillages – 39%Lake – 44%Florida – 48%
% Scoring Level 4.0 and UpVillages – 22%Lake – 24%Florida – 27%
2011 Performance
2012 Performance
GOALS FOR 2013 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Proficiency 66 56 59 56 61 60 56 56 54 49 45Learning Gains 59 64 67Learning Gains, Low 25% 56 66 69
Proficiency 71 57 60 56 60 55 51 52 52Learning Gains 67 66 69Learing Gains, Low 25% 63 64 67Percentage at Level 4 and above 80 82Percentage at Level 3.5 and abovePercentage at Level 3.0 and above 79* 44 48 49
SCIENCEProficiency 48 49 52 49 47
Total Points 510 501 525
* The State Board of Education changed the proficiency requirement for Wrting to Level 3.0 for the 2011-2012 School Year.
Performance Results by Grade Level Based on District FCAT 2.0 Reading, Math, Science and Writing Results for ALL Students by Grade LevelDISTRICT GRADE
MATH
WRITING
READING
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS DISTRICT STUDENT PERFORMANCE FOCUS AREAS
GOALS FOR 2012-2013 - R U C2 READY?