elementary number theory and methods of proof

182
Chapter 4: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof Section 4.7 Two Classical Theorems MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 38 / 50

Upload: malvin-tan

Post on 30-Jan-2016

20 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Chapter 4: Elementary Number Theory and

Methods of Proof

Section 4.7 Two Classical Theorems

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 38 / 50

Page 2: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Synopsis

Objective: Proofs of two famous theorems in mathematics:√

2 isirrational, and there are infinitely many prime numbers. Bothproofs use indirect arguments (i.e. proofs by contradiction) andwere well known more than 2000 yrs ago.

The irrationality of√

2.

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers.

When to use indirect proof.

Open questions in Number Theory.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 39 / 50

Page 3: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The irrationality of√

2

Theorem 4.7.1 Irrationality of√

2.√

2 is irrational.

Proof:

Suppose not. Then√

2 is rational.

Then there exists integers m and n

such that √2 =

m

n.

(We may assume

m, n have no common factors other than 1 or −1

,

else we may divide them by their common factors to get a new pair m1

and n1 that have no common factors.)

Squaring both sides of equation gives

2 =m2

n2.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 40 / 50

Page 4: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The irrationality of√

2

Theorem 4.7.1 Irrationality of√

2.√

2 is irrational.

Proof:

Suppose not. Then√

2 is rational. Then there exists integers m and n

such that √2 =

m

n.

(We may assume

m, n have no common factors other than 1 or −1

,

else we may divide them by their common factors to get a new pair m1

and n1 that have no common factors.)

Squaring both sides of equation gives

2 =m2

n2.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 40 / 50

Page 5: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The irrationality of√

2

Theorem 4.7.1 Irrationality of√

2.√

2 is irrational.

Proof:

Suppose not. Then√

2 is rational. Then there exists integers m and n

such that √2 =

m

n.

(We may assume m, n have no common factors other than 1 or −1,

else we may divide them by their common factors to get a new pair m1

and n1 that have no common factors.)

Squaring both sides of equation gives

2 =m2

n2.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 40 / 50

Page 6: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The irrationality of√

2

Theorem 4.7.1 Irrationality of√

2.√

2 is irrational.

Proof:

Suppose not. Then√

2 is rational. Then there exists integers m and n

such that √2 =

m

n.

(We may assume m, n have no common factors other than 1 or −1,

else we may divide them by their common factors to get a new pair m1

and n1 that have no common factors.)

Squaring both sides of equation gives

2 =m2

n2.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 40 / 50

Page 7: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The irrationality of√

2

Theorem 4.7.1 Irrationality of√

2.√

2 is irrational.

Proof:

Suppose not. Then√

2 is rational. Then there exists integers m and n

such that √2 =

m

n.

(We may assume m, n have no common factors other than 1 or −1,

else we may divide them by their common factors to get a new pair m1

and n1 that have no common factors.)

Squaring both sides of equation gives

2 =m2

n2.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 40 / 50

Page 8: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore

m is even

(by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “

m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1

”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 9: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even.

Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore

m is even

(by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 10: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore

m is even

(by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 11: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 12: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 13: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 14: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again,

n is even

.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 15: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again, n is even.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 16: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again, n is even.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 17: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Equivalently,2n2 = m2.

Note that left side of equation is even. Therefore, right side is even.

Therefore m is even (by Prop. 4.6.4).

Thereforem = 2k for some integer k .

Therefore2n2 = m2 = (2k)2 = 4k2.

Thereforen2 = 2k2.

Consequently n2 is even, and so by Prop. 4.6.4 again, n is even.

Hence both m and n have a common factor of 2.

This contradicts “ m, n have no common factors other than 1, −1”.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 41 / 50

Page 18: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof
Page 19: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not.

Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property. Therefore

√2 is a rational number

.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 20: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not. Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property. Therefore

√2 is a rational number

.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 21: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not. Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property. Therefore

√2 is a rational number

.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 22: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not. Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property. Therefore

√2 is a rational number

.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 23: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not. Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property.

Therefore

√2 is a rational number

.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 24: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not. Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property. Therefore√

2 is a rational number.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 25: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example (Proposition 4.7.2)

1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

Proof: Suppose not. Then 1 + 3√

2 is rational. Then there exists

integers a and b with b 6= 0 such that

1 + 3√

2 =a

b.

Rearranging, we find that3√

2 =a

b− 1 =

a− b

b.

Dividing both sides by 3 gives √2 =

a− b

3b.

Clearly a− b and 3b are integers. Also, 3b 6= 0 by the zero product

property. Therefore√

2 is a rational number.

This is a contradiction to√

2 is irrational. Hence 1 + 3√

2 is irrational.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 42 / 50

Page 26: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

Proposition 4.7.3

For any integer a and any prime number p, if p|a then p - (a + 1).

Proof:

Suppose not.

Then there exists an integer a and a prime number p such

that p|a and p|(a + 1).

Since p|a, there exists k ∈ Z such that

a = p · k . (1)

Since p|(a + 1), there exists l ∈ Z such that

a + 1 = p · l . (2)

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 43 / 50

Page 27: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

Proposition 4.7.3

For any integer a and any prime number p, if p|a then p - (a + 1).

Proof:

Suppose not. Then there exists an integer a and a prime number p such

that p|a and p|(a + 1).

Since p|a, there exists k ∈ Z such that

a = p · k . (1)

Since p|(a + 1), there exists l ∈ Z such that

a + 1 = p · l . (2)

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 43 / 50

Page 28: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

Proposition 4.7.3

For any integer a and any prime number p, if p|a then p - (a + 1).

Proof:

Suppose not. Then there exists an integer a and a prime number p such

that p|a and p|(a + 1).

Since p|a, there exists k ∈ Z such that

a = p · k . (1)

Since p|(a + 1), there exists l ∈ Z such that

a + 1 = p · l . (2)

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 43 / 50

Page 29: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

Proposition 4.7.3

For any integer a and any prime number p, if p|a then p - (a + 1).

Proof:

Suppose not. Then there exists an integer a and a prime number p such

that p|a and p|(a + 1).

Since p|a, there exists k ∈ Z such that

a = p · k . (1)

Since p|(a + 1), there exists l ∈ Z such that

a + 1 = p · l . (2)

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 43 / 50

Page 30: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer. This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 31: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer.

This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 32: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer. This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 33: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer. This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 34: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer. This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 35: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer. This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 36: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

The infinitude of the set of prime numbers

(Proof of Prop. 4.7.3 continues)

Subtracting equation (1) from equation (2), we arrive at

1 = p · l − p · k = p · (l − k).

Clearly l − k is an integer. This shows that p is a divisor of 1.

Since p is prime, p is positive.

Therefore, by Thm. 4.3.1,

p ≤ 1. (If a, b ∈ Z+ and a|b, then a ≤ b.)

This is a contradiction to p being prime is greater than 1.

Therefore the supposition is false.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 44 / 50

Page 37: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not.

Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N :=

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1

) =

N

.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 38: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N :=

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1

) =

N

.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 39: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N :=

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1

) =

N

.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 40: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N := p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1

) =

N

.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 41: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N := p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1

) =

N

.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 42: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N := p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (

p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1

) =

N

.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 43: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N := p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1) = N.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 44: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Theorem 4.7.4 Infinitude of the Primes

The set of prime numbers is infinite.

Proof: Suppose not. Then the set of prime numbers is finite, say there

are only n many prime numbers.

Then we may list all the prime numbers in ascending order,

p1 = 2, p2 = 3, p3 = 5, p4 = 7, . . . , pn.

Consider the integer N := p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1.

Then N > 1, and so by Theorem 4.3.4 (Any integer > 1 is divisible by a

prime), N is divisible by some prime number p, i.e. p|N.

Also, since p is prime, it must be equal to one of p1, p2, · · · pn.

Clearly p|p1p2p3 · · · pn, hence, by P. 4.7.3, p - (p1p2p3 · · · pn + 1) = N.

Hence p|N and p - N, which is a contradiction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 45 / 50

Page 45: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof
Page 46: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 47: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 48: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 49: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 50: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 51: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 52: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

When to use indirect proof

When do we use indirect proofs instead?

No definitive answer.

Many theorems can be proved either way, and in such situations,usually indirect proofs are clumsier.

If no clues suggests an indirect proof, try direct proof first.

If it doesn’t work, try finding a counterexample.

If counterexample isn’t found, try look for a proof bycontradiction/contraposition.

If THAT doesn’t work, try to have some coffee or tea, or take a walk,and then try again ...

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 46 / 50

Page 53: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Clues

How to find clues?

Perhaps examine examples for small values of n.

Try to construct counterexample. If that fails, try to see whatproperties denied your counterexamples.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 47 / 50

Page 54: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Clues

How to find clues?

Perhaps examine examples for small values of n.

Try to construct counterexample. If that fails, try to see whatproperties denied your counterexamples.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 47 / 50

Page 55: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Clues

How to find clues?

Perhaps examine examples for small values of n.

Try to construct counterexample. If that fails, try to see whatproperties denied your counterexamples.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 47 / 50

Page 56: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Open questions in Number Theory

A ‘nice’ or efficient formula for obtaining primes?

Mersenne primes, i.e. primes of the form 2p − 1, p is prime.– Are there infinitely many Mersenne primes?

Fermat primes, i.e. primes of the form 22n

+ 1.– Are there infinitely many Fermat primes?

Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1?

Is there always a prime between integers n2 and (n + 1)2?

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 48 / 50

Page 57: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Open questions in Number Theory

A ‘nice’ or efficient formula for obtaining primes?

Mersenne primes, i.e. primes of the form 2p − 1, p is prime.– Are there infinitely many Mersenne primes?

Fermat primes, i.e. primes of the form 22n

+ 1.– Are there infinitely many Fermat primes?

Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1?

Is there always a prime between integers n2 and (n + 1)2?

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 48 / 50

Page 58: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Open questions in Number Theory

A ‘nice’ or efficient formula for obtaining primes?

Mersenne primes, i.e. primes of the form 2p − 1, p is prime.– Are there infinitely many Mersenne primes?

Fermat primes, i.e. primes of the form 22n

+ 1.– Are there infinitely many Fermat primes?

Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1?

Is there always a prime between integers n2 and (n + 1)2?

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 48 / 50

Page 59: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Open questions in Number Theory

A ‘nice’ or efficient formula for obtaining primes?

Mersenne primes, i.e. primes of the form 2p − 1, p is prime.– Are there infinitely many Mersenne primes?

Fermat primes, i.e. primes of the form 22n

+ 1.– Are there infinitely many Fermat primes?

Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1?

Is there always a prime between integers n2 and (n + 1)2?

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 48 / 50

Page 60: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Open questions in Number Theory

A ‘nice’ or efficient formula for obtaining primes?

Mersenne primes, i.e. primes of the form 2p − 1, p is prime.– Are there infinitely many Mersenne primes?

Fermat primes, i.e. primes of the form 22n

+ 1.– Are there infinitely many Fermat primes?

Are there infinitely many primes of the form n2 + 1?

Is there always a prime between integers n2 and (n + 1)2?

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 48 / 50

Page 61: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

More open questions in Number Theory

Are there infinitely many primes of the form N = p1p2p3 · · · pk + 1?(Given that the pj ’s are all the initial primes)

Are there infinitely many twin primes, i.e. satisfying the property thatboth p and p + 2 are both primes?

For more information, see:

1 Richard K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.

2 P. Ribenboim, The new book of prime number records, 3rd edition,Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1995.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 49 / 50

Page 62: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

More open questions in Number Theory

Are there infinitely many primes of the form N = p1p2p3 · · · pk + 1?(Given that the pj ’s are all the initial primes)

Are there infinitely many twin primes, i.e. satisfying the property thatboth p and p + 2 are both primes?

For more information, see:

1 Richard K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.

2 P. Ribenboim, The new book of prime number records, 3rd edition,Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1995.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 49 / 50

Page 63: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

More open questions in Number Theory

Are there infinitely many primes of the form N = p1p2p3 · · · pk + 1?(Given that the pj ’s are all the initial primes)

Are there infinitely many twin primes, i.e. satisfying the property thatboth p and p + 2 are both primes?

For more information, see:

1 Richard K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.

2 P. Ribenboim, The new book of prime number records, 3rd edition,Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1995.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 49 / 50

Page 64: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

More open questions in Number Theory

Are there infinitely many primes of the form N = p1p2p3 · · · pk + 1?(Given that the pj ’s are all the initial primes)

Are there infinitely many twin primes, i.e. satisfying the property thatboth p and p + 2 are both primes?

For more information, see:

1 Richard K. Guy, Unsolved Problems in Number Theory.

2 P. Ribenboim, The new book of prime number records, 3rd edition,Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1995.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 49 / 50

Page 65: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Check

One way to prove that√

2 is irrational is to

1 assume√

2 = a/b for some integers a and b with

,

2 square both sides and multiply both sides by b2 to get ,

3 show that a and b have a .

One way to prove that there are infinitely many prime numbers is to

1 assume there is a largest prime number p,

2 construct the number ,

3 show that this number has to be divisible by a prime number that is

.

MH1300 Lecture handout 5 (NTU) §4.7 Two Classical Theorems 50 / 50

Page 66: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question: Are the following logically equivalent?

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 1. If first statement form is true, then second statement form is true.

Suppose ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true, then we are done.

Else, ∃c ∈ D such that ¬P(c).

Therefore, ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 1 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 68 / 69

Page 67: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question: Are the following logically equivalent?

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 1. If first statement form is true, then second statement form is true.

Suppose ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true, then we are done.

Else, ∃c ∈ D such that ¬P(c).

Therefore, ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 1 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 68 / 69

Page 68: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question: Are the following logically equivalent?

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 1. If first statement form is true, then second statement form is true.

Suppose ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true, then we are done.

Else, ∃c ∈ D such that ¬P(c).

Therefore, ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 1 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 68 / 69

Page 69: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question: Are the following logically equivalent?

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 1. If first statement form is true, then second statement form is true.

Suppose ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true, then we are done.

Else, ∃c ∈ D such that ¬P(c).

Therefore, ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 1 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 68 / 69

Page 70: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question: Are the following logically equivalent?

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 1. If first statement form is true, then second statement form is true.

Suppose ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true, then we are done.

Else, ∃c ∈ D such that ¬P(c).

Therefore, ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 1 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 68 / 69

Page 71: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question con’t

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 2. If second statement form is true, then first statement form is true.

Since second statement form is true, either ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true

or ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 2 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 69 / 69

Page 72: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question con’t

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 2. If second statement form is true, then first statement form is true.

Since second statement form is true, either ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true

or ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 2 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 69 / 69

Page 73: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Question con’t

∀x ∈ D, ∀y ∈ E , (P(x)∨Q(y)), and (∀x ∈ D,P(x))∨(∀x ∈ E ,Q(x)).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Part 2. If second statement form is true, then first statement form is true.

Since second statement form is true, either ∀x ∈ D,P(x) is true

or ∀x ∈ E ,Q(x) is true.

Hence Part 2 is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 3 (NTU) §3.4 Arguments with Quantified Statements 69 / 69

Page 74: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Chapter 5: Sequences, Mathematical Induction,

and Recursion

Section 5.1 Sequences

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 1 / 66

Page 75: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Synopsis

Objective: A review of sequences and sums.This is mostly a review of past knowledge of that you alreadylearnt from H2 Mathematics at A’levels or equivalent Mathsubject taken at high school.

Sequences.

Examples.

Summation notation, telescoping sum.

Product notation, computing products.

Factorial notation.

Properties of summation and products.

Change of variable.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 2 / 66

Page 76: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Definition

A sequence is a function whose domain is either

all the integers between two given integers, or

all the integers greater than or equal to a given integer

.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 3 / 66

Page 77: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Definition

A sequence is a function whose domain is either

all the integers between two given integers, or

all the integers greater than or equal to a given integer.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 3 / 66

Page 78: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 79: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 80: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 81: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 82: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 83: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 84: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sequences

Typically denoted asam, am+1, am+2, . . . , an,

each individual element ak (read as “a sub k”) is called a term.

The k in ak is called a subscript or index.

The integer m is the subscript of the initial term.

The integer n is the subscript of the final term.

The notationam, am+1, am+2, . . .

denotes an infinite sequence.

An explicit formula or general formula for a sequence is a rule thatshows how the values of ak depend on k .

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 4 / 66

Page 85: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.3

Find an explicit formula for a sequence that has the following initial terms:

1, −1

4,

1

9, − 1

16,

1

25, − 1

36, . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

Denote by ak the general term of the sequence and suppose the first termis a1.

Then1

12, − 1

22,

1

32, − 1

42,

1

52, − 1

62, . . .

l l l l l la1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 . . .

Then

ak =

(−1)k+1 1

k2

for all integers k ≥ 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 5 / 66

Page 86: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.3

Find an explicit formula for a sequence that has the following initial terms:

1, −1

4,

1

9, − 1

16,

1

25, − 1

36, . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

Denote by ak the general term of the sequence and suppose the first termis a1.

Then1

12, − 1

22,

1

32, − 1

42,

1

52, − 1

62, . . .

l l l l l la1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 . . .

Then

ak =

(−1)k+1 1

k2

for all integers k ≥ 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 5 / 66

Page 87: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.3

Find an explicit formula for a sequence that has the following initial terms:

1, −1

4,

1

9, − 1

16,

1

25, − 1

36, . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

Denote by ak the general term of the sequence and suppose the first termis a1.

Then1

12, − 1

22,

1

32, − 1

42,

1

52, − 1

62, . . .

l l l l l la1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 . . .

Then

ak =

(−1)k+1 1

k2

for all integers k ≥ 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 5 / 66

Page 88: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.3

Find an explicit formula for a sequence that has the following initial terms:

1, −1

4,

1

9, − 1

16,

1

25, − 1

36, . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

Denote by ak the general term of the sequence and suppose the first termis a1.

Then1

12, − 1

22,

1

32, − 1

42,

1

52, − 1

62, . . .

l l l l l la1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 . . .

Then

ak = (−1)k+1 1

k2for all integers k ≥ 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 5 / 66

Page 89: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Summation notation

Definition

If m and n are integers and m ≤ n, then the symboln∑

k=m

ak , read

summation from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the sum of all terms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∑

k=m

ak = am + am+1 + am+2 + · · ·+ an.

k is the index of the summation,

m is the lower limit of the summation,

n is the upper limit of the summation.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 6 / 66

Page 90: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Summation notation

Definition

If m and n are integers and m ≤ n, then the symboln∑

k=m

ak , read

summation from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the sum of all terms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∑

k=m

ak = am + am+1 + am+2 + · · ·+ an.

k is the index of the summation,

m is the lower limit of the summation,

n is the upper limit of the summation.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 6 / 66

Page 91: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Summation notation

Definition

If m and n are integers and m ≤ n, then the symboln∑

k=m

ak , read

summation from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the sum of all terms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∑

k=m

ak = am + am+1 + am+2 + · · ·+ an.

k is the index of the summation,

m is the lower limit of the summation,

n is the upper limit of the summation.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 6 / 66

Page 92: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Summation notation

Definition

If m and n are integers and m ≤ n, then the symboln∑

k=m

ak , read

summation from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the sum of all terms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∑

k=m

ak = am + am+1 + am+2 + · · ·+ an.

k is the index of the summation,

m is the lower limit of the summation,

n is the upper limit of the summation.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 6 / 66

Page 93: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Summation notation

Definition

If m and n are integers and m ≤ n, then the symboln∑

k=m

ak , read

summation from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the sum of all terms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∑

k=m

ak = am + am+1 + am+2 + · · ·+ an.

k is the index of the summation,

m is the lower limit of the summation,

n is the upper limit of the summation.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 6 / 66

Page 94: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.7

Express the following using summation notation:

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

The general term is k+1n+k for integers k from 0 to n.

Therefore,

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n=

n∑k=0

k + 1

n + k.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 7 / 66

Page 95: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.7

Express the following using summation notation:

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

The general term is k+1n+k for integers k from 0 to n.

Therefore,

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n=

n∑k=0

k + 1

n + k.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 7 / 66

Page 96: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.7

Express the following using summation notation:

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

The general term is k+1n+k for integers k from 0 to n.

Therefore,

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n=

n∑k=0

k + 1

n + k.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 7 / 66

Page 97: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.7

Express the following using summation notation:

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

The general term is k+1n+k for integers k from 0 to n.

Therefore,

1

n+

2

n + 1+

3

n + 2+ · · ·+ n + 1

2n=

n∑k=0

k + 1

n + k.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 7 / 66

Page 98: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is

1

1 · 2=

1

2

.

For n = 2, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 99: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is

1

1 · 2=

1

2

.

For n = 2, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 100: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is1

1 · 2=

1

2.

For n = 2, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 101: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is1

1 · 2=

1

2.

For n = 2, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 102: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is1

1 · 2=

1

2.

For n = 2, the sum is1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 103: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is1

1 · 2=

1

2.

For n = 2, the sum is1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 104: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is1

1 · 2=

1

2.

For n = 2, the sum is1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 105: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example 5.1.8

What is the value of the expression

1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4+ · · ·+ 1

n · (n + 1)

when n = 1? n = 2? n = 3?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

For n = 1, the sum is1

1 · 2=

1

2.

For n = 2, the sum is1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3=

1

2+

1

6=

2

3.

For n = 3, the sum is1

1 · 2+

1

2 · 3+

1

3 · 4=

1

2+

1

6+

1

12=

3

4.

Caution

Although the sum seems to suggest that n must be at least 3 (since thefirst 3 terms are given), but there is no such suggestion implied.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 8 / 66

Page 106: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Telescoping sum

Example 5.1.10. Use the identity

1

k− 1

k + 1=

(k + 1)− k

k(k + 1)=

1

k(k + 1)

to find a simple expression for∑n

k=11

k(k+1) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:n∑

k=1

1

k(k + 1)

=n∑

k=1

(1

k− 1

k + 1

)

=

(1

1− 1

2

/

)+

(1

2

/

− 1

3

/

)+

(1

3

/

− 1

4

/

)+ · · ·+

(1

n − 1

/

− 1

n

/

)+

(1

n

/

− 1

n + 1

)= 1− 1

n + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 9 / 66

Page 107: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Telescoping sum

Example 5.1.10. Use the identity

1

k− 1

k + 1=

(k + 1)− k

k(k + 1)=

1

k(k + 1)

to find a simple expression for∑n

k=11

k(k+1) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:n∑

k=1

1

k(k + 1)

=n∑

k=1

(1

k− 1

k + 1

)

=

(1

1− 1

2

/

)+

(1

2

/

− 1

3

/

)+

(1

3

/

− 1

4

/

)+ · · ·+

(1

n − 1

/

− 1

n

/

)+

(1

n

/

− 1

n + 1

)= 1− 1

n + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 9 / 66

Page 108: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Telescoping sum

Example 5.1.10. Use the identity

1

k− 1

k + 1=

(k + 1)− k

k(k + 1)=

1

k(k + 1)

to find a simple expression for∑n

k=11

k(k+1) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:n∑

k=1

1

k(k + 1)

=n∑

k=1

(1

k− 1

k + 1

)=

(1

1− 1

2

/

)+

(1

2

/

− 1

3

/

)+

(1

3

/

− 1

4

/

)+ · · ·+

(1

n − 1

/

− 1

n

/

)+

(1

n

/

− 1

n + 1

)

= 1− 1

n + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 9 / 66

Page 109: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Telescoping sum

Example 5.1.10. Use the identity

1

k− 1

k + 1=

(k + 1)− k

k(k + 1)=

1

k(k + 1)

to find a simple expression for∑n

k=11

k(k+1) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:n∑

k=1

1

k(k + 1)

=n∑

k=1

(1

k− 1

k + 1

)=

(1

1− 1

2

/)+

(1

2

/− 1

3

/)+

(1

3

/− 1

4

/)+ · · ·+

(1

n − 1

/− 1

n

/)+

(1

n

/− 1

n + 1

)

= 1− 1

n + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 9 / 66

Page 110: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Telescoping sum

Example 5.1.10. Use the identity

1

k− 1

k + 1=

(k + 1)− k

k(k + 1)=

1

k(k + 1)

to find a simple expression for∑n

k=11

k(k+1) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:n∑

k=1

1

k(k + 1)

=n∑

k=1

(1

k− 1

k + 1

)=

(1

1− 1

2

/)+

(1

2

/− 1

3

/)+

(1

3

/− 1

4

/)+ · · ·+

(1

n − 1

/− 1

n

/)+

(1

n

/− 1

n + 1

)= 1− 1

n + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 9 / 66

Page 111: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Product notation

Definition

For integers m and n with m ≤ n, the symboln∏

k=m

ak , read the

product from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the product of all theterms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∏

k=m

ak = am · am+1 · am+2 · · · an.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 10 / 66

Page 112: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Product notation

Definition

For integers m and n with m ≤ n, the symboln∏

k=m

ak , read the

product from k equals m to n of a sub k , is the product of all theterms

am, am+1, am+2, . . . , an.

We writen∏

k=m

ak = am · am+1 · am+2 · · · an.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 10 / 66

Page 113: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Factorial notation

Definition

For each positive integer n, the quantity n factorial denoted n!, is definedto be the product of all the integers from 1 to n:

n! := n · (n − 1) · (n − 2) · · · 3 · 2 · 1.

Zero factorial, denoted by 0!, is defined to be 1:

0! := 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 11 / 66

Page 114: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Factorial notation

Definition

For each positive integer n, the quantity n factorial denoted n!, is definedto be the product of all the integers from 1 to n:

n! := n · (n − 1) · (n − 2) · · · 3 · 2 · 1.

Zero factorial, denoted by 0!, is defined to be 1:

0! := 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 11 / 66

Page 115: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=

4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=

20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 116: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=

4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=

20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 117: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=

4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=

20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 118: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=

20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 119: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 120: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 121: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 122: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 123: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Example.

a. Compute∏6

k=4k

(k−2)2−3 .

b. Simplify 3!·3!7! .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:a.

6∏k=4

k

(k − 2)2 − 3=

4

22 − 3· 5

32 − 3· 6

42 − 3

=4

1· 5

6· 6

13

=20

13.

b.3! · 3!

7!=

3! · 3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4 · 3!=

3!

7 · 6 · 5 · 4=

1

140.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 12 / 66

Page 124: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Properties of summation and products

Theorem 5.1.1

If am, am+1, am+2, . . . , and bm, bm+1, bm+2, . . . , are sequences of realnumbers and c is any real number, then the following equations hold forany integer n ≥ m:

1

n∑k=m

ak +n∑

k=m

bk =n∑

k=m

(ak + bk).

2 c ·n∑

k=m

ak =n∑

k=m

(c · ak) (generalized distribution law.)

3

(n∏

k=m

ak

(n∏

k=m

bk

)=

n∏k=m

(ak · bk).

Proof: Simple application of mathematical induction in Section 5.2 andproperties of addition and multiplication. Left as exercise.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 13 / 66

Page 125: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Properties of summation and products

Theorem 5.1.1

If am, am+1, am+2, . . . , and bm, bm+1, bm+2, . . . , are sequences of realnumbers and c is any real number, then the following equations hold forany integer n ≥ m:

1

n∑k=m

ak +n∑

k=m

bk =n∑

k=m

(ak + bk).

2 c ·n∑

k=m

ak =n∑

k=m

(c · ak) (generalized distribution law.)

3

(n∏

k=m

ak

(n∏

k=m

bk

)=

n∏k=m

(ak · bk).

Proof: Simple application of mathematical induction in Section 5.2 andproperties of addition and multiplication. Left as exercise.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 13 / 66

Page 126: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Properties of summation and products

Theorem 5.1.1

If am, am+1, am+2, . . . , and bm, bm+1, bm+2, . . . , are sequences of realnumbers and c is any real number, then the following equations hold forany integer n ≥ m:

1

n∑k=m

ak +n∑

k=m

bk =n∑

k=m

(ak + bk).

2 c ·n∑

k=m

ak =n∑

k=m

(c · ak) (generalized distribution law.)

3

(n∏

k=m

ak

(n∏

k=m

bk

)=

n∏k=m

(ak · bk).

Proof: Simple application of mathematical induction in Section 5.2 andproperties of addition and multiplication. Left as exercise.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 13 / 66

Page 127: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Properties of summation and products

Theorem 5.1.1

If am, am+1, am+2, . . . , and bm, bm+1, bm+2, . . . , are sequences of realnumbers and c is any real number, then the following equations hold forany integer n ≥ m:

1

n∑k=m

ak +n∑

k=m

bk =n∑

k=m

(ak + bk).

2 c ·n∑

k=m

ak =n∑

k=m

(c · ak) (generalized distribution law.)

3

(n∏

k=m

ak

(n∏

k=m

bk

)=

n∏k=m

(ak · bk).

Proof: Simple application of mathematical induction in Section 5.2 andproperties of addition and multiplication. Left as exercise.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 13 / 66

Page 128: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Properties of summation and products

Theorem 5.1.1

If am, am+1, am+2, . . . , and bm, bm+1, bm+2, . . . , are sequences of realnumbers and c is any real number, then the following equations hold forany integer n ≥ m:

1

n∑k=m

ak +n∑

k=m

bk =n∑

k=m

(ak + bk).

2 c ·n∑

k=m

ak =n∑

k=m

(c · ak) (generalized distribution law.)

3

(n∏

k=m

ak

(n∏

k=m

bk

)=

n∏k=m

(ak · bk).

Proof: Simple application of mathematical induction in Section 5.2 andproperties of addition and multiplication. Left as exercise.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 13 / 66

Page 129: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Ex. 5.1.60

Express the following as a single summation.

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1)

=n∑

k=1

(6k2 + 8) +n∑

k=1

(10k2 − 5)

=n∑

k=1

(16k2 + 3)

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 14 / 66

Page 130: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Ex. 5.1.60

Express the following as a single summation.

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1)

=n∑

k=1

(6k2 + 8) +n∑

k=1

(10k2 − 5)

=n∑

k=1

(16k2 + 3)

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 14 / 66

Page 131: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Ex. 5.1.60

Express the following as a single summation.

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1)

=n∑

k=1

(6k2 + 8) +n∑

k=1

(10k2 − 5)

=n∑

k=1

(16k2 + 3)

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 14 / 66

Page 132: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Ex. 5.1.60

Express the following as a single summation.

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1).

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Solution:

2 ·n∑

k=1

(3k2 + 4) + 5 ·n∑

k=1

(2k2 − 1)

=n∑

k=1

(6k2 + 8) +n∑

k=1

(10k2 − 5)

=n∑

k=1

(16k2 + 3)

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 14 / 66

Page 133: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:

When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j =

k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0

.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now

j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n

.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 134: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j =

k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0

.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now

j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n

.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 135: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j =

k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0

.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now

j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n

.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 136: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now

j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n

.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 137: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now

j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n

.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 138: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 139: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by

j + 1

.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 140: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by j + 1.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 141: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by j + 1.

the general term, kn+k , is now

(j+1)n+(j+1) = j+1

n+j+1

.

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 142: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by j + 1.

the general term, kn+k , is now (j+1)

n+(j+1) = j+1n+j+1 .

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 143: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by j + 1.

the general term, kn+k , is now (j+1)

n+(j+1) = j+1n+j+1 .

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 144: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Change of variable – Example 4.1.16a

Transform the following summation by making the specified change ofvariable.

summation:n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)change of variable: j = k − 1.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Solution:When making the change of variable j = k − 1,

the lower limit, k = 1, is now j = k − 1 = 1− 1 = 0.

the upper limit, k = n + 1, is now j = k − 1 = (n + 1)− 1 = n.

since j = k − 1, the variable k is replaced by j + 1.

the general term, kn+k , is now (j+1)

n+(j+1) = j+1n+j+1 .

Therefore,n+1∑k=1

(k

n + k

)=

n∑j=0

(j + 1

n + j + 1

).

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 15 / 66

Page 145: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Check

The expanded form ofn∑

k=m

ak is .

The value of a1 + a2 + a3 + · · ·+ an when n = 2 is “ ”.

If n is a positive integer, then n! = .

n∑k=m

ak + cn∑

k=m

bk =

(n∏

k=m

ak

)(n∏

k=m

bk

)=

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.1 Sequences 16 / 66

Page 146: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Chapter 5: Sequences, Mathematical Induction,

and Recursion

Sections 5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 17 / 66

Page 147: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Synopsis

Objective: A review of Mathematical Induction.This is mostly a review of past knowledge of that you alreadylearnt from H2 Mathematics at A’levels or equivalent Mathsubject taken at high school.

Principle of Mathematical Induction.

Sum of the first n integers.

Sum of geometric sequence.

Application.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 18 / 66

Page 148: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Let a be a fixed integer and let P(n) be a property that is defined forintegers n ≥ a.

Suppose the following two statements are true:

P(a) is true.

For all integers k ≥ a, if P(k) is true then P(k + 1) is true.

Then the statement

for all integers n ≥ a,P(n)

is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 19 / 66

Page 149: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Let a be a fixed integer and let P(n) be a property that is defined forintegers n ≥ a.

Suppose the following two statements are true:

P(a) is true.

For all integers k ≥ a, if P(k) is true then P(k + 1) is true.

Then the statement

for all integers n ≥ a,P(n)

is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 19 / 66

Page 150: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Let a be a fixed integer and let P(n) be a property that is defined forintegers n ≥ a.

Suppose the following two statements are true:

P(a) is true.

For all integers k ≥ a, if P(k) is true then P(k + 1) is true.

Then the statement

for all integers n ≥ a,P(n)

is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 19 / 66

Page 151: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Method of Proof by Mathematical Induction

Consider a statement of the form“For all integers n ≥ a, a property P(n) is true”.

To prove such a statement, perform the following two steps:

Step 1. (basis step): Show that the property is true for n = a.

Step 2. (inductive step): Show that for all integers k ≥ a, if the property istrue for n = k then it is true for n = k + 1. To perform this step,

suppose that the property is true for n = k, where k is anyparticular but arbitrarily chosen integer with k ≥ a.[This supposition is called the inductive hypothesis]

Then show that the property is true for n = k + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 20 / 66

Page 152: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Method of Proof by Mathematical Induction

Consider a statement of the form“For all integers n ≥ a, a property P(n) is true”.

To prove such a statement, perform the following two steps:

Step 1. (basis step): Show that the property is true for n = a.

Step 2. (inductive step): Show that for all integers k ≥ a, if the property istrue for n = k then it is true for n = k + 1. To perform this step,

suppose that the property is true for n = k, where k is anyparticular but arbitrarily chosen integer with k ≥ a.[This supposition is called the inductive hypothesis]

Then show that the property is true for n = k + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 20 / 66

Page 153: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Method of Proof by Mathematical Induction

Consider a statement of the form“For all integers n ≥ a, a property P(n) is true”.

To prove such a statement, perform the following two steps:

Step 1. (basis step): Show that the property is true for n = a.

Step 2. (inductive step): Show that for all integers k ≥ a, if the property istrue for n = k then it is true for n = k + 1. To perform this step,

suppose that the property is true for n = k, where k is anyparticular but arbitrarily chosen integer with k ≥ a.[This supposition is called the inductive hypothesis]

Then show that the property is true for n = k + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 20 / 66

Page 154: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Method of Proof by Mathematical Induction

Consider a statement of the form“For all integers n ≥ a, a property P(n) is true”.

To prove such a statement, perform the following two steps:

Step 1. (basis step): Show that the property is true for n = a.

Step 2. (inductive step): Show that for all integers k ≥ a, if the property istrue for n = k then it is true for n = k + 1. To perform this step,

suppose that the property is true for n = k , where k is anyparticular but arbitrarily chosen integer with k ≥ a.[This supposition is called the inductive hypothesis]

Then show that the property is true for n = k + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 20 / 66

Page 155: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Principle of Mathematical Induction

Method of Proof by Mathematical Induction

Consider a statement of the form“For all integers n ≥ a, a property P(n) is true”.

To prove such a statement, perform the following two steps:

Step 1. (basis step): Show that the property is true for n = a.

Step 2. (inductive step): Show that for all integers k ≥ a, if the property istrue for n = k then it is true for n = k + 1. To perform this step,

suppose that the property is true for n = k , where k is anyparticular but arbitrarily chosen integer with k ≥ a.[This supposition is called the inductive hypothesis]

Then show that the property is true for n = k + 1.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 20 / 66

Page 156: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For

n ≥ 1

, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2

.

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that

1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1

. Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 157: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For

n ≥ 1

, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2

.

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that

1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1

. Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 158: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 1, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2

.

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that

1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1

. Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 159: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 1, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2 .

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that

1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1

. Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 160: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 1, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2 .

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that

1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1

. Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 161: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 1, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2 .

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that

1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1

.

Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 162: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 1, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2 .

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that 1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1.

Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 163: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of the first n integers

Theorem 5.2.2 Sum of the first n integers

For all n ≥ 1,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ n =n(n + 1)

2.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 1, let the property P(n) be the equation

1 + 2 + 3 + · · ·+ n = n(n+1)2 .

Basis step: Want to show:

1 =1 · (1 + 1)

2.

Simplifying the right side, we see that 1·(1+1)2 = 1·2

2 = 1. Therefore P(1) istrue.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 21 / 66

Page 164: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2

. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=

k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1)

(by the inductive hypothesis)

=

(k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 165: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2

. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=

k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1)

(by the inductive hypothesis)

=

(k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 166: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=

k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1)

(by the inductive hypothesis)

=

(k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 167: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=

k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1)

(by the inductive hypothesis)

=

(k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 168: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1) (by the inductive hypothesis)

=

(k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 169: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1) (by the inductive hypothesis)

= (k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 170: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1) (by the inductive hypothesis)

= (k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 171: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1) (by the inductive hypothesis)

= (k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 172: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 1 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ k =k(k + 1)

2.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1) =(k + 1)(k + 2)

2. (1)

Note that the left side of equation (1) is

1 + 2 + · · ·+ (k + 1)

= (1 + 2 + · · ·+ k) + (k + 1)

=k(k + 1)

2+ (k + 1) (by the inductive hypothesis)

= (k + 1)

(k

2+ 1

)=

(k + 1)(k + 2)

2,

which is the right side of equation (1).

Therefore P(k + 1) is true.

Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 22 / 66

Page 173: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥

0

, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =

x0+1 − 1

x − 1

.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 174: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥

0

, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =

x0+1 − 1

x − 1

.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 175: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 0, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =

x0+1 − 1

x − 1

.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 176: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 0, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =

x0+1 − 1

x − 1

.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 177: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 0, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =x0+1 − 1

x − 1.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 178: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 0, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =x0+1 − 1

x − 1.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 179: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Sum of geometric sequence

Theorem 5.2.3 Sum of a geometric sequence

For any real number x except 1, and any integer n ≥ 0,

n∑i=0

x i =xn+1 − 1

x − 1.

Proof (by mathematical induction):

For n ≥ 0, let the property P(n) be the equation∑n

i=0 xi = xn+1−1

x−1 .

Basis step: Want to show:

x0 =x0+1 − 1

x − 1.

Simplifying, the left side equals x0 = 1, and the right side equals x−1x−1 = 1.

Therefore, both sides of the equation agree, and so P(0) is true.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 23 / 66

Page 180: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 0 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,k∑

i=0

x i =xk+1 − 1

x − 1.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,k+1∑i=0

x i =

xk+2 − 1

x − 1

. (2)

Note that the left side of equation (2) is

k+1∑i=0

x i =

xk+1 +k∑

i=0

x i

=

xk+1 +xk+1 − 1

x − 1(by the inductive hypothesis)

=

xk+1 · (x − 1) + xk+1 − 1

x − 1=

xk+2 − 1

x − 1,

which is the right side of equation (2).Therefore P(k + 1) is true.Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.

MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 24 / 66

Page 181: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 0 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,k∑

i=0

x i =xk+1 − 1

x − 1.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,k+1∑i=0

x i =

xk+2 − 1

x − 1

. (2)

Note that the left side of equation (2) is

k+1∑i=0

x i =

xk+1 +k∑

i=0

x i

=

xk+1 +xk+1 − 1

x − 1(by the inductive hypothesis)

=

xk+1 · (x − 1) + xk+1 − 1

x − 1=

xk+2 − 1

x − 1,

which is the right side of equation (2).Therefore P(k + 1) is true.Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 24 / 66

Page 182: Elementary Number Theory and Methods of Proof

Inductive step: Let k ∈ Z with k ≥ 0 and suppose that P(k) is true, i.e.,k∑

i=0

x i =xk+1 − 1

x − 1.

Want to show: P(k + 1) is true, i.e.,k+1∑i=0

x i =xk+2 − 1

x − 1. (2)

Note that the left side of equation (2) is

k+1∑i=0

x i = xk+1 +k∑

i=0

x i

= xk+1 +xk+1 − 1

x − 1(by the inductive hypothesis)

=xk+1 · (x − 1) + xk+1 − 1

x − 1=

xk+2 − 1

x − 1,

which is the right side of equation (2).Therefore P(k + 1) is true.Therefore Theorem is true by mathematical induction.MH1300 Lecture handout 6 (NTU) §5.2, 5.3 Mathematical Induction I & II 24 / 66