eighth annual conference theme: hydroponics...techology• (nft), and developed that system at the...

142
PROCEEDINGS EIGHTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE THEME: HYDROPONICS- EFFECTIVE GROWING TECHNIQUES SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOT HOTEL APRIL 4, 1987 SPONSORED BY HYDROPONIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA Scien\.:e P.O. BOX 6067 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94524 Agr. ;ulture

Upload: others

Post on 15-Feb-2021

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • PROCEEDINGS

    EIGHTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE

    THEME: HYDROPONICS-EFFECTIVE GROWING TECHNIQUES

    SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT MARRIOT HOTEL

    APRIL 4, 1987

    SPONSORED BY

    HYDROPONIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA

    Scien\.:e

    P.O. BOX 6067 CONCORD, CALIFORNIA 94524

    Agr. ;ulture

  • NOITCE

    1he Hydroponic Society of hoorica, or its representatives, makes no warranty, expressed or inplied, or assunes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, conpleteness or usefulness of any infonmtion, apparatus, product or process disclosed, or represents that its use ~uld not infringe privately owned rights. Use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsen:ent of the products named or criticism of similar ones not Irentioned.

    All rights reserved

    No part of these Proceedings my be · reproduced in any form without proir written pennission of the Hydroponic Society of hoorica.

  • FOREWORD

    The 1987 Annual Conference is the largest and most comprehensive ever attempted by the Hydroponic Society of America. It reflects our united

    . resolve to continue fulfilling our principal goals to promote interest in scientific research and education, and to provide a forum for the reporting of research and the exchange of information about hydroponic growing. This year's theme, Effective Growing Techniques, evolved from the infor-mational questionaires returned by members attending last year's annual conference.

    As our Society becomes larger, more mature, and gains greater knowledge of the past and present, we must also look to the future and explore in various directions in order to fulfill our purpose. The greatly expanded space station research being done to devise integrated growing systems should be observed carefully. This work will yield new information on how plants grow and on the technology of environmental control. Most impor-tantly, greater public awareness of the research will provide a much expanded knowledge of and appreciation for hydroponic growing. Therefore, in-cluded in the conference program is a presentation on the art and science of acquaculture to broaden our knowledge of the relationships between plants and animals in an aquatic environment. In addition, in order to provide more comprehensive in~depth information in a timely manner, we are introducing special subject, concurrent mini-sessions organized into a format of lecture, discussion, and demonstration.

    Our 1987 conference program would not be possible without the help of a number of people. Included in that group are Scott Karney and his program committee who performed a monumental task in creating and organizing the program. Gene Brisbon, in addition to being our Corresponding Secretary and editor of the newsletter, handled the publicity and performed a thousand other jobs, keeping the Society functioning smoothly all year in preparation for this event. My sincere appreciation to these and to everyone who worked so hard to make it possible for us to continue to learn and share our experiences at this conference.

    Q I /) · 1c~ ~O'Brien

    President

  • PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGTH ANNUAL HYDROPONIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA CONFERENCE

    HYDROPONICS: EFFECTIVE GROWING TECHNIQUES

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    FOREWORD-PRESIDENT'S ADDRESS

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    PRESENTATIONS:

    1. Keynote Address-NFT Developments and Hydroponic Update Dr. Allen J. Cooper- Director Nutrient Film Technology Ltd., England 1

    2. Aquaculture- Another Hydroponic Technique? Dr. Tom McCormick- McCormick Associates, Berkeley, California 21

    3. Hydroponics in Research Mr. Steve Grattan- Plant Water Specialist, U.C Davis Cooperative Extension 41

    4. Marketing Hydroponically Grown Products Mr. Robert W. Munyon- Munyon Farms, Lodi, California 50

    5. Computerized Environmental Control: The Basics Dr. Strven Schwartzkopf- Plant Physiologist_ U.C Davis 58

    6. Trouble Shooting With Tissue Culture Mr. Carl P. Spiva- Consulting Agronomist 64

    . 7. Marketing Strategies for Hydroponic Equipment Dr. Joseph E. Howland- Reynolds School of Journalism, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 74

    8. Computerized Environmental Control: Advanced Dr. Maynard Bates- Campbell Research Institute, Pennsylvania 79

    9. Growing Unusual Crops Mr. Brian Mauza- Provincial Greenhouse Specialist_ British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture and Food 92

    10. Hydro-Aeroponics Unit for Research Purposes Dr. HilleiSofer- Senior Researcher, Volcani Center, Israel Prepared by Scott Karney 99

    11. Nutrient Requirement Changes During Plant Development Dr. Arnold Bloom- Vegetable Crops Department_ UC Davis 104

    12. Hydroponics in Infertile Areas- Problems and Techniques Dr. Allen J. Cooper- Director Nutrient Film Technology Ltd., England 113

    OFFICERS/BOARD OF TRUSTEES 121

    PASTPRESIDENTSUST 122

    CONSTITUTION AND BY-LAWS 123

  • NFT DEVELOPMENTS AND HYDROPONIC UPDATE

    BY ALLEN J. COOPER

    DR. ALLEN COOPER IS MANAGING DIRECTOR OF NUTRIENT FILM TECHNOLOGY·

    LrD •• HooK LANE. ALDINGBOURNE, CHICHESTER. WEST SussEX 02110, ENGLAND. HE IS AN INTERNATIONALLY ACCLAIMED EXPERT ON NUTRIENT FILM

    TECHOLOGY• (NFT), AND DEVELOPED THAT SYSTEM AT THE GLASSHOUSE CROPS

    RESEARCH INSTITUTE (GCR!) IN LITTLEHAMPTON WHERE HE WAS PLANT PATHOL-

    OGIST. DR. COOPER WAS CERTAINLY ONE OF THE FIRST TO RECOGNIZE THE

    COMMERCIAL POSSIBILITIES OF NFT, AND HAS SHARED HIS EXPERTISE IN

    SEVERAL BOOKS lNCLUDING ROOT TEMPERATURE AND PLANT GROWTH AND THE

    ;ABC OF NFT.

    ! WANT TO BEGIN BY CONSIDERING COMMERCIAL HYDROPONIC CROP PRO-

    DUCTION IN GREENHOUSES BECAUSE IT IS IN GREENHOUSES THAT THE MAJORITY

    OF THE DEVELOPMENT WORK ON HYDROPONICS HAS BEEN DONE. ! ALSO WANT TO

    START BY CONSIDERING THE PRESENT SITUATION IN THE ENGLISH GREENHOUSE

    INDUSTRY BECAUSE IT IS AN INDUSTRY IN WHICH HAS BEEN A MAJOR

    CHANGEOVER TO HYDROPONICS IN RECENT YEARS. THIS MEANS MAINLY

    CONSIDERING TOMATO PRODUCTION BECAUSE IT IS FAR AND AWAY THE MAJOR

    CROP THAT IS GROWN COMMERCIALLY IN GREENOUSES IN ENGLAND.

    FOR MANY YEARS NOW IT HAS BEEN QUITE CLEAR THAT THE

    TIME-HONOURED METHOD OF GROWING TOMATO CROPS IN SOIL IS NO LONGER A

    VIABLE COMMERCIAL

    PROPOSITION FOR TOMATO PRODUCTION IN GREENHOUSES AND THERE ARE

    VIRTUALLY NO SOIL GROWERS LEFT. THERE IS NO DEBATE ABOUT THE FACT

    THAT SOME FORM OF HYDROPONIC PRODUCTIONHAS TO BE USED. HOWEVER, THERE

    IS CONSIDERABLE DEBATE ABOUT WHICH FORM SHOULD BE USED. As IN ALL

    DEBATES, THERE ARE CLAIMS AND COUNTER-CLAIMS AND THE GROWER FINDS

    HIMSELF IN THE DIFFICULT POSITION OF TRYING TO SORT THE TRUE FROM THE FALSE.

    THERE ARE THREE RIVAL HYDROPONIC SYSTEMS CURRENTLY COMPETING FOR

    GROWERS' FAVOURS, NAMELY PEAT BAGS, ROCKWOOL SLABS AND NFT. How DOES

    A GROWER DECIDE WHICH IS THE BEST SYSTEM?

    IT IS OBVIOUSLY NO USE ASKING THE SUPPLIERS OF PEAT BAGs,·

    l

  • 2

    ROCKWOOL SLABS OR NFT EQUIPMENT. THEIR ANSWER IS A FOREGONE

    CONCLUSION. RESULTS FROM COMPARATIVE TRIALS AT AN INDEPENDENT

    GOVERN-MENT STATION CAN ALWAYS BE COUNTERED BY THE COMMENT THAT THE SUPER-

    VISORY STAFF ARE BETTER AT HANDLING ONE SYSTEM THAN THE OTHER. EVEN

    IF A GROWER GOES TO THE EXPENSE OF CARRYING OUT SMALL SCALE COMPARA-

    TIVE TRIALS FOR HIMSELF IN HIS OWN GREENHOUSES, HE IS FACED WITH THE

    SAME CRITICISM THAT, WITH WITH HIS PRESENT LACK OF EXPERIENCE OF THE

    NEW SYSTEMS, HIS PAST KNOWLEDGE HAS CAUSED HIM TO BE INITIALLY MORE

    SUCCESSFUL WITH ONE SYSTEM THAN WITH THE OTHERS. ALSO HIS CONFIDENCE

    IN HIS RESULTS JS, OR SHOULD BE, UNDERMINED BY THE THOUGHT THAT HE

    HAD NO REPLICATION BECAUSE HE WAS JUST ONE INDIVIDUAL ON ONE SITE;

    IN SUCH A SITUATION HriW DOES A GROWER DECIDE WHICH SYSTEM TO

    USE?

    DURING 1986 AN ALMOST CHANCE OCCURANCE HAS ANSWERED THE QUESTION. THERE IS A TRADE MAGAZINE PUBLISHED IN ENGLAND CALLED THE

    "GROWER" WHICH IS RATHER SIMILAR TO THE "AMERICAN VEGETABLE GROWER".

    THIS MAGAZINE OPERATES EVERY YEAR A RECORDING SCHEME IN WHICH EIGHT

    LEADING GREENHOUSE TOMATO GROWERS MAKE THEIR YIELD FIGURES AND THEIR

    INCOME AND EXPENDATURE FIGURES AVAILABLE. THESE DATA ARE PUBLISHED

    MONTHLY IN THE "GROWER" FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE.

    IT IS RATHER LIKE A CHAMPIONSHIP LEAGUE TABLE.

    Now, IN 1986 IT SO HAPPENED THAT FOUR OF THESE TOP GROWERS WERE USING ROCKWOOL AND FOUR WERE USING NFT. NONE WERE USING PEAT BAGS.

    SLIDE 1 THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE MEAN CUMULATIVE YIELDS MONTH BY MONTH FOR

    THE FOUR ROCKWOOL GROWERS AND FOR THE FOUR NFT GROWERS EXPRESSED AS

    TONS PER ACRE. IT CAN BE SEEN FROM THE RIGHT-HAND COLUM THAT THE NFT

    GROWERS CONSISTENTLY OUTYIELDED THE ROCKWOOL GROWERS.

    HOWEVER, THERE IS MORE TO MAKING A PROFIT THAN JUST OBTAINING A

    HEAVY YIELD. THE MEAN LABOUR AND FUEL COSTS OF THE ROCKWOOL GROWERS

    WERE 37,602 POUNDS PER ACRE WHEREAS THOSE OF THE NFT GROWERS WERE 32,156 POUNDS PER ACREi A DIFFERENCE OF 5446 PoUNDS PER ACRE IN FAVOUR OF NFT.

    THE COMBINED EFFECTS OF THE HIGHER YIELDS AND THE LOWER

  • OPERATING COSTS OF THE NFT GROWERS CAN BE EXPRESSED BY USING THE

    MARGIN FIGURES PER TON OF FRUIT, I.E. THE NET RETURN PER TON OF FRUIT

    LESS THE LABOUR AND FUEL COSTS. THE MEAN MARGIN OF THE FOUR NFT

    GROWERS WAS 360 POUNDS PER TON WHEREAS THE MEAN MARGIN OF THE FOUR NFT GROWERS WAS 427 POUNDS PER TON, AN ADVANTAGE IN THE MARGINS OF 19% IN FAVOUR OF NFT CROPPING.

    I HAVE USED THIS EXAMPLE, NOT JUST TO SHOW THAT NFT CROPPING IS

    LEADING THE FIELD IN EFFICIENT HYDROPONIC PRODUCTION GREENHOUSE

    TOMATO PRODUCTION, BUT ALSO TO SHOW THAT HYDROPONICSINENGLAND IS NO

    LONGER MERELY A WAY-OUT IDEA OF ENTHUSIASTS. IT IS COMMERCIAL REALITY

    TO SUCH AND EXTENT THAT WITHOUT HYDROPONIC PRODUCTION THE ENGLISH

    GR~ENHOUSE TOMATO INDUSTRY WOULD SUFFER FINANCIALLY VERY SEVERELY

    BECAUSE THE EVOLUTION OF ITS HIGH OUTPUT STRUCTURE HAS HOMED IN ON

    HYDROPONIC CROPPING.

    SLIDE 2 THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMERCIAL NFT TOMATO NURSERY.

    SLIDE 3 THIS IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMERCIAL NFT CUCUMBER NURSERY.

    SLIDE 4 THIS IS A VERY POOR SLIDE ILLUSTRATING A VERY SUCCESSFUL NFT

    LETTUCE OPERATION WHERE THE WHOLE OF THE FLOOR OF TWELVE ACRES OF

    GREENHOUSE HAS BEEN COVERED IN CONCRETE IN WHICH CHANNELS HAVE BEEN

    FORMED TO CANALISE THE FLOWING SOLUTION PAST THE BARE ROOTS OF THE

    LETTUCE. Two OF THE ROWS OF LETTUCE HAVE BEEN REMOVED SO THAT THE

    CHANNELS CAN BE SEEN.

    THESE SLIDES ARE EXAMPLES OF THE WAY IN WHICH THE ENGLISH

    GREENHOUSE INDUSTRY HAS BECOME ALMOST ENTIRELY BASED ON HYDROPONICS

    IN ONE FORM OR ANOTHER.

    IN THIS PRESENTATION SO FAR I HAVE JUMPED RIGHT INTO THE DEEP

    END BECAUSE I WANTED TO SHOW THAT HYDROPONICS IS BEING USEDFOR

    SUCCESSFUL COMMERCIAL CROP PRODUCTION ON A VERY LARGE SCALE. IT IS

    NOW BIG BUSINES AND HAS TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY. IT IS NO LONGER JUST A

    HOBBY INTEREST OF AMATEURS TO BE WRITTEN OFF BY THE COMMERCIAL CYNICS.

    HAVING, I HOPE, ESTABLISHED THE COMMERCIAL POSITION OF

    3

  • 4

    HYDROPONIC CROP PRODUCTION IN GENERAL AND THE PRE-EMINENCE OF NFT

    CROPPING IN PARTICULAR, I WOULD NOW LIKE TO RETURN TO THE VERY

    BEGINNING FOR THE BENEFIT OF THOSE WHO ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE

    NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE.

    NFT CROPPING CAN BE SAID TO HAVE BEGUN IN 1971 WHEN DR.DE STIGTER AT THE PLANT PHYSIOLOGICAL RESEARCH CENTRE IN HoLLAND DEVISED

    A LABORATORY TECHNIQUE TO ENABLE HIM TO MAKE AUTORADIOGRAPHS OF THE

    UNDISTURBED ROOT SYSTEM OF A MUSK MELON PLANT IN HIS STUDIES ON THE

    TRANSLOCATION OF PHOTOSYNTHATES USING A RADIOACTIVE CARBON ISOTOPE.

    THE ROOT SYSTEM O.F THE PLANT WAS GROWN IN A RECIRCULATING FILM OF

    NUTRIENT SOLUTION.

    TEN YEARS LATER THIS PRINCIPLE WAS DEVELOPED AT THE GLASSHOUSE

    CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN ENGLAND INTO THE NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE

    OF GLASSHOUSE CROP PRODUCTION. THE ORIGINAL NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE

    IS ILLUSTRATED IN THE FOLLOWING SLIDE.

    SLIDE 5

    A CATCHMENT TRENCH WAS CONSTRUCTED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPING RECTANGLE OF LAND THAT WAS TO BE CROPPED. THE TRENCH WAS FILLED WITH

    NUTRIENT SOLUTION THAT WAS PUMPED UP A PIPE TO THE TOP OF THE SLOPING

    LAND. THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION WAS DISCHARGED FROM HOLES IN THE PIPE

    INTO THE TOP ENDS OF THE SLOPING CHANNELS IN WHICH THE PLANTS WERE

    GROWN. THE SOLUTION THEN FLOWED BY GRAVITY DOWN THE CHANNELS FROM

    WHICHIT WAS DISCHARGED BACK INTO THE CATCHMENT TRENCH. THE

    CHANNELSWERE FORMED FROM POLYTHENE FILM. THE YOUNG PLANTS WERE RAISED

    IN PAPER POTS FILLED WITH COMPOST AND WHEN THE PLANTS WERE PLACED ON

    THE LONG, NARROW STRIPS OF POLYTHENE FILM THE EDGES OF THE POLYTHENE

    FILM WERE CLIPPED TOGETHER BETWEEN THE PLANTS TO FORM THE CHANNELS.

    SLIDE 6

    THIS SLIDE PUTS SOME FLESH ON THE PREVIOUS DIAGRAM. IT SHOWS THE

    CATCHMENT TRENCH LINED WITH POLYTHENE FILM TO MAKE IT WATER-PROOF,

    THE PREPARED SLOPE ON THE GROUND TO BE CROPPED AND THE PLASTIC PIPE

    ALONG WHICH THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION WAS PUMPED TO THE TOP OF· THE

    SLOPING LAND.

    SLIDE 7

  • THIS SLIDE SHOWS ONE OF THE FIRST CROPS GROWN IN THE ORIGINAL

    SYSTEM.

    SLIDE 8 THIS SLIDE SHOWS ONE OF THE CHANNELS OPENED UP SO THAT YOU CAN

    SEE THE PAPER POTS FILLED WITH COMPOST IN WHICH THE YOUNG PLANTS WERE

    RAISED. You CAN ALSO SEE THE ROOT MAT THAT DEVELOPED OUTSIDE THE POTS IN THE RECIRCULATING NUTRIENT SOLUTION IN THE BOTTOM OF THE

    CHANNEL.

    BECAUSE THIS ROOT MAT WAS ONLY ABOUT ONE CENTIMETER THICK• IT

    WAS EASILY SUBMERGED BY THE SOLUTION FLOWING DOWN .THE CHANNEL WHERE-

    EVER THERE WAS A SLIGHT DEPRESSION ON THE SLOPING LAND. THIS RESULTED

    IN THE ROOTS BEING LITERALLY. DROWNED IN THESE DEPRESSIONS AND EVERY

    FARMER KNOWS HOW BADLY PLANTS GROW IF THEIR ROOTS ARE PERMANENTLY

    WATERLOGGED. THIS MEANT THAT THE SLOPE OF THE GROUND HAD TO BE

    PERFECTLY SMOOTH. THE ACHIEVING OF A PERFECTLY SMOOTH SLOPE ON THE

    GROUND IS VERY DIFFICULT AND IT IS EASILY DESTROYED BY SETTLEMENT IF

    THE GROUND BECOMES WET. CONSEQUENTLY ONE OF THE FIRST IMPROVEMENTS

    MADE TO THE ORIGINAL TECHNIQUE WAS TO PLACE THE POLYTHENE FILM CHAN-

    NELS ON SLIGHTLY ELEVATED METAL TRAYS WHOSE HEIGHT COULD BE ADJUSTED

    TO GIVE A PERFECTLY SMOOTH SLOPE. THESE TRAYS ACCOUNT FOR ABOUT

    40% OF THE EQUIPMENT COST OF CURRENT CONVENTIAL NFT. As THE QUANTITY OF ROOTS WHICH DEVELOPS IN THE CHANNELS

    INCREASES WITH PLANT AGE THE MASS OF ROOTS CREATES A PROGRESSIVELY

    GREATER DAMMING EFFECT ON THE FLOW OF NUTRIENT SOLUTION EVEN IN THE

    PERFECTLY SMOOTH CHANNELS. IT IS THEREFORE NECESSARY TO KEEP A

    CAREFUL WATCH ON SOLUTION DEPTH AND TO REDUCE THE FLOW RATE AS THE

    QUANTITY OF ROOTS INCREASES SO THAT THE ROOTS ARE NOT SUBMERGED. IT

    IS ESSENTIAL TO KEEP THE TOP HALF OF THE ROOT MAT IN THE AIR SO THAT

    GASSES CAN DIFFUSE INTO AND OUT OF THE ROOTS BECAUSE THE DIFFUSION

    RATE OF GASSES IN AIR IS 10,000 TIMES MORE RAPID IN AIR THAN IT IS IN WATER. IN CONVENTIONAL NFT WITH ONLY ABOUT A ONE CENTIMETRE DEPTH OF

    ROOT MAT THERE IS VERY LITTLE TOLERANCE FOR ERROR• AND ONCE THE ROOTS

    ARE SUBMERGED THEY RAPIDLY DIE, THE PLANTS WILT AND PYTHIUM AND

    PHYTOPHTHERA BEGIN TO INVADE THE ROOT SYSTEM.

    IF THIS PRINCIPLE CANNOT BE OBSERVED THEN VERY HIGH FLOW RATES

    MUST BE MAINTAINED IN AN ATTEMPT TO CARRY SUFFICIENT DISSOLVED OXYGEN

    TO THE SUBMERGED ROOTS.

    5

  • 5

    ANOTHER CHANGE IN THE ORIGINAL TECHNIQUE THAT IS FOUND IN

    CURRENT CONVENTIONAL NFT IS THE ELIMINATION OF THE CATCHMENT TRENCH

    IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE WASTE OF VALUABLE GLASSHOUSE SPACE AND ITS

    REPLACEMENT BY A CATCHMENT PIPE WHICH DISCHARGES INTO A CATCHMENT

    TANK. BECAUSE THE VOLUME OF THE CATCHMENT TANK WAS MUCH LESS THAN THE

    VOLUME OF THE ORIGINAL TRENCH THE TOTAL VOLUME OF LIQUID IN THE

    SYSTEM WAS LESSo I.E.THE VOLUME OF NUTR.IENT SOLUTION PER PLANT WAS

    REDUCED. CONSEQU~NTLYo TO AVOID WIDE FLUCTUATION IN THE NUTRIENT

    CONTENT AND THE PH OF THE RELATIVELY SMALL VOLUME OF SOLUTION IN THE

    SYSTEM IT BECAME NECESSARY TO DEVELOP MONITORING AND INJECTION

    EQUIPMENT TO INJECT ACI~ AND· NUTRIENTS AUTOMATICALLY TO MAINTAIN A

    CONSTANT CONCENTRATION OF NUTRIENTS AND A CONSTANT PH IN THE

    RECIRCULATING NUTRIENT SOLUTION.

    SLIDE 9 THIS SLIDE SHOWS A IN-LINE PH PROBE WHICH SENDS A CONTINUOUS

    SIGNAL BACK TO A CONTROL PANEL. THE METHOD USED TO MONITOR THE

    NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION OF RECIRCULATING SOLUTION WAS TO MEASURE THE

    ELECTRICAL CONDUCTANCE OF THE SOLUTION USING A CONDUCTIVITY PROBE

    WHICH ALSO SENT A CONTINUOUS SIGNAL BACK TO THE CONTROL PANEL. THIS

    METHOD MERELY MEASURES THE TOTAL SOLUTES IN THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION AND

    IGNORES ANY CHANGES IN THE RATIOS OF THE COMPONENT NUTRIENT ELEMENTS.

    SLIDE 10 THIS SLIDE SHOWS A TYPICAL CONTROL PANEL. IT COMPRISES A PH

    METER AND A CONDUCTIVITY METER AT THE TOP OF THE PANEL WHICH RECEIVE

    THE SIGNALS FROM THE MONITORING PROBES AND CONTROL THE AUTOMATIC

    OPERATION OF THREE PUMPS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PANEL WHICH INJECT

    DILUTE ACID AND TWO NUTRIENT STOCK SOLUTIONS TO MAINTAIN A CONSTANT

    CONDITION IN THE RECIRCULATING NUTRIENT SOLUTION.

    THIS SYSTEMo WHICH I WILL CALL "CONVENTIONAL NFT", IS CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A GOOD CROPo AS YOU SAW ON AN EARLIER SLIDE, AND IT HAS

    BEEN USED ON A LARGE COMMERCIAL SCALE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM FOR MANY

    YEARS NOW FOR THE PRODUCTION OF GLASSHOUSE TOMATOES AND LETTUCE.

    SLIDE 11 THIS SLIDE SHOWS ONE OF THE VERY FIRST COMMERCIAL INSTALLATIONS.

  • SLIDE 12 THIS IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE SAME INSTALLATION AND YOU CAN SEE THAT THE

    POLYTHENE CHANNELS ARE RESTING DIRECTLY ON THE GROUND.

    SLIDE 13 THIS SLIDE SHOWS A LATER COMMERCIAL INSTALLATION USING SLIGHTLY

    ELEVATED, ADJUSTABLE METAL BASES TO PROVIDE THE ESSENTIAL SMOOTH

    SLOPE FOR THE CHANNELS TO REST ON •

    . SLIDE 14 THIS IS A CLOSE-UP OF THE INLET END OF ONE OF THE ELEVATED

    CHANNELS.

    SLIDE 15 THIS SHOWS HOW A SMOOTH SLOPE WAS ACHIEVED ON ANOTHER COMMERCIAL

    INSTALLATION. THE GROUND WAS COMPLETELY COVERED WITH CONCRETE AND THE

    POLYTHENE FILM CHANNELS WERE PLACED DIRECTLY ON THE CONCRETE. THIS

    SLIDE HAS AN IMPORTANT IMPLICATION FOR THE THIRD WORLD. I WANT TO

    LEAVE DISCUSSION OF THIRD WORLD REQUIREMENTS UNTIL LATER, BUT ONE OF

    THE ADVERSE CONDITIONS WHICH EXISTS IN MANY THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES IS

    THE LACK OF SUFFICIENT FERTILE LAND. IT IS NOT AN EXAGERATION TO SAY

    THAT CONCRETE IS ONE OF THE LEAST FERTILE SOILS IN THE WORLD AND THE

    SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LUSH, GREEN GROWTH THAT YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN

    IS THAT THE THIRD WORLD LIMITATION OF INFERTILE SOIL CAN BE

    ELIMINATED.

    LIGHTS

    FROM WHAT I HAVE DISCUSSED SO FAR I THINK YOU WILL AGREE THAT

    CONVENTIONAL NFT, AS DEVELOPED AT THE GLASSHOUSE CROPS RESEARCH

    J INSTITUTE, WAS FOUND TO BE CAPABLE OF PRODUCING GOOD CROPS OF GLAss-~ HOUSE CROPS UNDER LARGE SCALE COMMERCIAL CONDITIONS. THERE THEN

    W FOLLOWED SEVERAL YEARS OF FURTHER RESEARCH AIMED AT REFINING THE

    EXISTING TECHNIQUE WITHOUT MAKING ANY RADICAL CHANGES IN THE BASIC

    FORM OF THE TECHNIQUE.

    7

  • 8

    .. - . ·---~---··--- ..

    ONE OF THE INITIAL FEARS ABOUT NFT TOMATO CROPPING HAD BEEN

    RELATED TO THE LACK OF LIGHT IN AN ENGLISH WINTER CHARACTERISED BY

    LONG NIGHTS WITH SIXTEEN HOURS OF DARKNESS AND SHORT DAYS IN WHICH

    THE LIGHT INTENSITY WAS EXTREMELY LOW DUE TO THICK CLOUDS AND RAIN

    BLOTTING OUT THE SUN FOR MOST OF THE TIME. UNDER THESE CONDITIONS

    EVERY TOMATO GROWER KNEW THAT THERE WOULD BE RAMPANT VEGETATIVE

    GROWTH AND NO FRUIT DEVELOPMENT UNLESS THE VEGETATIVE GROWTH WAS

    RESTRICTED BY CAREFULLY RESTRICTING THE WATER AVAILABLE TO THE

    PLANTS. IN THE NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE THERE WAS AN ABUNDANT SUPPLY

    OF BOTH WATER AND NUTRIENTS AND THIS WAS REGARDED AS A SURE RECIPE

    FOR VIGOROUS VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND NO FRUIT PRODUCTION IN POOR LIGHT

    CONDITIONS . IT WAS A TRADITIONAL VIEWWHICH I REGARD AS BEING WHOLLY

    IRRELEVANT TO NFT CROPPING BECAUSE IT IGNORES THE FACT THAT AN NFT

    SYSTEM IS A CLOSED SYSTEM WHEREAS MOST METHODS OF PRODUCTION ARE OPEN

    SYSTEMS. To ILLUSTRATE WHAT I MEAN I WOULD DEFINE A PLANT GROWING IN

    A POT WITHOUT ANY DRAINAGE HOLES AS GROWING IN A CLOSED SYSTEM

    WHEREAS A PLANT GROWING IN THE GROUND WITH FREE DRAINAGE AND

    UNLIMITED ROOM FOR ROOT GROWTH AS GROWING IN AN OPEN SYSTEM. THE

    TRADITIONAL VIEW OF THE BENEFICIAL EFFECT ON FRUIT DEVELOPMENT OF

    RESTRICTING THE WATER SUPPLY UNDER POOR LIGHT CONDITIONS HAD EVOLVED

    OVER GENERATIONS OF GROWING TOMATO CROPS IN OPEN SYSTEMS. IT WAS A

    WELL FOUNDED AND CORRECT VIEW AND TRADITION DIES HARD IN ENGLAND.

    CONSEQUENTLY, WHEN NFT CROPPING INTRODUCED A CHANGE FROM AN OPEN TO

    A CLOSED SYSTEM THE TRADITIONAL FEAR OF AN A ABUNDANCE OF WATER

    LINGERED ON. As A RESULT OF RESEARCH.EFFORT WAS PUT INTO THE DEVELOPMENT OF METHODS OF INTERRUPTED FLOW IN NFT CROPPING IN WHICH

    THE PUMPS RECIRCULATING THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION WERE STOPPED AND THE

    SOLUTION WAS ALLOWED TO DRAIN BACK TO THE CATCHMENT TANK SO THAT THE

    CHANNELS COULD PROGRESSIVELY DRY OUT UNTIL IT WAS DEEMED TO BE

    NECESSARY TO RESTART THE PUMPS.

    fORTUNATELY EVERYONE WOULD AGREE THAT THIS PRACTICE IS NOT

    REQUIRED IN HIGH LIGHT AREAS AND EVEN IN LOW LIGHT AREA$ THERE WAS

    ALWAYS THE RISK THAT AN ERROR OF JUDGEMENT RESULTING IN TOO MUCH

    DRYING OUT OF THE ROOTS WOULD HAVE ADVERSE EFFECT. IT IS ALSO

    DEBATABLE WHETHER THE BENEFITS CLAIMED FOR THIS PRACTICE ARE

    ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE TACITLY ASSUMED CAUSE, NAMELY THE RESTRICTION OF

  • ' !

    VEGETATIVE GROWTH. AN EQUALLY LIKELY CAUSE IS AN IMPROVEMENT IN THE

    AERATION OF THE ROOT SYSTEM• PARTICULARLY WHERE THERE IS AN

    IMPERFECTLY SMOOTH SLOPE. IF THIS IS THE REAL REASONTHEN THERE ARE

    SAFER WAYS OF IMPROVING AERATION WHICH I WILL DISCUSS LATER.

    A LOT OF VERY INTERESTING WORK ON CROP NUTRITION WAS ALSO

    STIMULATED BY THE INTRODUCTION OF NFT CROPPING BECAUSE IN A CLOSED

    SYSTEM IT IS VERY EASY TO CALCULATE A NUTRITIONAL BALANCE SHEET.

    9

    IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS A VERY WIDE TOLERANCE TO THE SUPPLY OF

    NUTRIENTS. FoR· EXAMPLE• CONCENTRATIONS OF POTASSIUM MAINTAINED

    CONSTANT OVER THE RANGE OF 10 PPM TO 400 PPM HAD LITTLE EFFECT ON YIELD. IN TRIALS AT THE GLASSHOUSE CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE THE

    YIELDS PER PLANT OVER 28 HARVESTS OF TOMATOES WERE 10 KILOGRAMS AT 10, 20, 50, 150 AND 400 PPM OF POTASSIUM. THERE WAS• HOWEVER• AN EFFECT OF POTASSIUM CONCENTRATION ON FRUIT QUALITY. THE PERCENTAGE OF

    NON-UNIFORMLY RIPENED DECREASED AS THE POTASSIUM IN THE RECIRCULATING

    NUTRIENT SOLUTION WAS INCREASED. WITH 10 PPM OF POTASSIUM 30% OF THE FRUIT SUFFERED FROM UNEVEN RIPENING WHEREAS AT 400 PPM THERE WAS ONLY 8% OF NON-UNIFORMLY RIPENED FRUIT. INCREASING THE CONCENTRATION OF POTASSIUM REDUCED RIPENING DISORDERS AND PROGRESSIVELY INCREASED THE

    DRY MATTER CONTENT OF THE FRUIT• THEIR ACID CONTENT• THEIR POTASSIUM

    CONTENT AND THE ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY OF THE FRUIT JUICES - ALL OF

    WHICH ADDED UP TO AN IMPROVEMENT IN FLAVOUR.

    INCREASING THE POTASSIUM CONTENT OF THE SOLUTION, HOWEVER,

    ADVERSELY AFFECTED MAGNESIUM UPTAKE AND IT WAS FOUND TO BE NECESSARY

    TO MAINTAIN NOT LESS THAN 75 PPM OF MAGNESIUM IN THE SOLUTION, WHILE AT VERY HIGH CONCENTRATIONS OF POTASSIUM IT WAS EVEN NECESSARY TO

    RESORT TO FOLIAR SPRAYING WITH A 1% SOLUTION OF MAGNESIUM SULPHATE TO PREVENT THE DEVELOPMENT OF SYMPTOMS OF MAGNESIUM DEFICIENCY.

    THE YIELD RESPONSE TO THE CONCENTRATION OF CALCIUM IN THE

    SOLUTION WAS ALSO DETERMINED QUITE PRECISELY FOR TOMATOES. AT

    CONCENTRATIONS ABOVE 100 PPM OF CALCIUM THERE WAS LITTLE EFFECT ON YIELD BUT AT CONCENTRATIONS BELOW 100 PPM THE YIELD DECREASED WITH A DECREASE IN CALCIUM CONCENTRATION. THIS WAS DUE TO A REDUCTION IN

    FRUIT SIZE. AT CONCENTRATIONS OF LESS THAN 50 PPM OF CALCIUM THERE WAS A MARKED INCREASE IN THE OCCURRENCE OF BLOSSOM END ROT AND AT 10 AND 20 PPM THE GROWING POINTS OF THE PLANTS WERE KILLED. THE RESULTS

  • 10

    SHOWED QUITE CLEARLY THAT THE CALCIUM CONTENT OF THE SOLUTION MUST BE

    MAINTAINED AT NOT LESS THAN 100 PPM. WORK ON THE CONCENTRATION OF IRON SHOWED THAT UP TO THE START

    OF PICKING TOMATOES,A HIGH CONCENTRATION OF IRON OF ABOUT 15 PPM WAS ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASE IN YIELD BUT THAT ONCE PICKING BEGAN,A

    LOWER CONCENTRATION OF 5 PPM ~AS BENEFICIAL. SOME WORK WAS ALSO DONE ON THE BORON CONCENTRATION IN THE

    RECIRCULATING NUTRIENT SOLUTION AND IT WAS FOUND THAT OVER THE RANGE

    OF 0.1 TO 2 PPM OF BORON THERE WAS LITTLE. EFFECT ON TOMATO YIELD BUT HIGHER OR LOWER CONCENTRATIONS REDUCED YIELD.

    THE TRADITIONAL B~LIEF THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO RESTRICT THE

    VEGETATIVE GROWTH OF TOMATOES UNDER LOW LIGHT CONDITIONS EVEN SPILLED

    OVER INTO THE NUTRITIONAL FIELD AND CONSIDERABLE WORK WAS DONE ON THE

    EFFECT OF THE OVERALL CONCENTRATION OF THE SOLUTION, I.E. ITS

    SALINITY. IT WAS FOUND THAT SALINITIES ABOVE A cf OF 40 (I.E. 4 MILLIMHOS OR 4000 MICROMHOS OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTANCE) REDUCED VEGETATIVE GROWTH AND THIS REDUCTION IN VEGETATIVE GROWTH WAS

    ASSOCIATED WITH A REDUCTION IN YIELD. HOWEVER• cf VALUES OF UP TO 40 COULD BE MAINTAINED WITHOUT ANY REDUCTION IN YIELD. UP TO THIS LIMIT

    AN INCREASE IN SALINITY WAS ASSOCIATED WITH SOME IMPROVEMENT IN FRUIT

    QUALITY.

    IN DISCUSSING THE NUTRITIONAL WORK THAT HAS BEEN DONE OF NFT

    CROPPING , I MAY HAVE GIVEN THE IMPRESSION THAT THE TOLERANCE LEVELS

    FOR NUTRIENT SUPPLY ARE SO WIDE THAT THERE IS VERY LITTLE EXPERTISE

    REQUIRED IN THE CONTROL OF NUTRITION. IT IS TRUE THAT PLANTS CAN

    ADAPT TO A WIDE RANGE OF NUTRIENT FORMULATIONS AND CONCENTRATIONS.

    CONSEQUENTLY KEEPING THE PLANTS ALIVE IS EASY, BUT AS I WILL DISCUSS LATER, QUALITY SPECIFICATIONS IN AN INCREASINGLY COMPETITIVE MARKET

    ARE BECOMING EVER MORE DEMANDING. I WOULD LIKE TO STRESS THAT THE

    ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MAXIMUM YIELD OF HIGH QUALITY PRODUCE DEMANDS THE

    MAINTAINING OF TIGHT NUTRITIONAL PROGRAMMES AND, AS THE MARKET

    REQUIREMENTS BECOME MORE AND MORE DEMANDING, SO THE REQUIREMENT FOR

    NUTRITIONAL EXPERTISE BECOMES INCREASINGLY IMPORTANT.

    ALL THE WORK THAT I HAVE DESCRIBED ON NUTRITION WAS DONE WITH CONVENTIONAL NFT SYSTEMS IN WHICH THE AMOUNT OF SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM

  • ,, -· IN THE SYSTEM WAS KEPT TO A MINIMUM, NAMELY THAT WHICH WAS NECESSARY

    FOR THE PROPAGATION OF THE PLANTS• USUALLY A FIVE INCH CUBE OF

    ROCKWOOL OR A SIMILAR SIZED POT FILLED WITH COMPOST. THERE IS,

    HOWEVER• ALMOST AN INSTINCTIVE URGE TO RETURN TO A SOLID ROOTING

    MEDIUM AND SEVERAL MODIFICATIONS OF THE NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE WERE

    DEVELOPED IN WHICH THIS URGE WAS APPARENT. IN ONE OF THESE

    MODIFICATIONS THE CHANNELS WERE MADE OF RIGID PLASTIC AND THEY WERE

    FILLED WITH AGGREGATE. THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION WAS RECIRCULATED ALONG

    THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNELS THROUGH THE AGGREGATE. IN ANOTHER VERSION,

    THE POLYTHENE FILM CHANNELS WERE RETAINED•, BUT LONG, NARROW SLABS OF

    ROCKWOOL WERE PLACED END TO END IN THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNELS AND THE

    NUTRIENT SOLUTION WAS RECIRCULATED ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THE CHANNEL.

    THESE MODIFICATIONS IN MY OPINION LEAD DOWN A BLIND ALLEY. IT IS

    VERY DIFFICULT TO THINK OF ANY ADVANTAGES IN USING A SOLID ROOTING

    MEDIUM THAT ARE NOT OUT WEIGHED BY DISADVANTAGES AND, IN ADDITION,

    THE USE OF A SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM LIMITS THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE

    POTENTIAL THAT IS LATENT IN THE NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE.

    WHILE THESE EXCURSIONS INTO THE INCORPORATION OF SOLID ROOTING

    MEDIA WERE GOING ON A MODIFICATION WAS DEVELOPED IN ISRAEL WHICH WENT

    TO THE OTHER EXTREME. BARE ROOTED PLANTS WERE SUSPENDED IN THE

    CHANNELS AND A NUTRIENT SUPPLY PIPE WITH ~INE HOLES IN IT WAS RUN

    ALONG THE TOP OF EACH CHANNEL SO THAT THE RECIRCULATING NUTRIENT

    SOLUTION CAME OUT OF THE SUPPLY PIPE AS A SERIES OF FINE JETS WHICH

    SPRAYED ON TO THE ROOTS OF THE PLANTS. THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION THEN

    DRIPPED OFF THE ROOTS OF THE PLANTS AND FLOWED DOWN THE BASE OF THE

    CHANNEL BACK TO THE CATCHMENT TANK. THIS IS THE EIN GEDI SYSTEM

    DEVELOPED BY HILLEL SOFFER.

    IN MY VIEW, HE WAS MOVING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION BY USING BARE

    ROOTED PLANTS IN A SYSTEM COMPLETELY DEVOID OF ANY SOLID ROOTING

    MEDIUM BUT IT WAS AS EXTREME A POSITION AS THE OPPOSITE EXTREME OF

    COMPLETELY FILLING THE CHANNELS WITH A SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM. A GOOD COMPROMISE HAS RECENTLY EMERGED WHICH I BELIEVE TO BE TO BE THE MOST

    LIKELY WAY AHEAD IN THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF NFT CROPPING. THIS

    COMPROMISE WAS TO REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM IN

    CONVENTIONAL NFT BY USING SMALL PIECES OF CAPILLARY MATTING FOR PLANT

    PROPAGATION INSTEAD OF LARGE ROCKWOOL CUBES OR POTS FILLED WITH

    COMPOST.

  • 12

    THIS COMPROMISE RESULTED FROM THE FACT THAT IN THE 1970's TWO MAJOR BRITISH PUBLIC COMPANIES BECAME INTERESTED IN EXPLOITING THE

    NUTRIENT FILM TECHNIQUE. THESE TWO COMPANIES MADE DIAMETRICALLY

    OPPOSED POLICY DECISIONS. ONE OF THEM (DUNLOP PLC) DECIDED TO TAKE

    CONVENTIONAL NFT AND MARKET IT WORLD WIDE THROUGH ITS THEN SUBSIDIARY

    COMPANY, SOILLESS CULTIVATION SYSTEMS. THE OTHER (ARIEL INDUSTRIES

    PLC) DECIDED THAT CONVENTIONAL NFT WAS AND EMBRYONIC TECHNIQUE THAT

    HAD LIMITATIONS AND THAT FURTHER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT WAS

    REQUIRED PRIOR TO MARKETING IT.

    THE LIMITATIONS THAT WERE CONSIDERED TO BE PRESENT WERE AS

    FOLLOWS.

    1. THE TOLERANCE OF ABOUT ONE CENTIMETRE THAT WAS AVAILABLE TO AVOID DROWNING THE ROOT MAT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE INSUFFICIENT.

    2. THE COMPLEXITY OF THE MONITORING AND INJECTION EQUIPMENT WAS CONSIDERED TO BE TOO GREAT. IT NEEDED REGULAR ATTENTION TO MAINTAIN

    ACCURACY BECAUSE THE PH PROBES DRIFTED RAPIDLY AND BECAUSE OF ITS

    COMPLEXITY• THE EQUIPMENT SOONER OR LATER WOULD BREAK DOWN. THIS

    REPRESENTED NO PROBLEM IN A SMALL COUNTRY WITH LONG LINES OF

    COMMUNICATION AND A LESS CONCENTRATED TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE, BUT

    IN A LARGE COUNTRY WITH LONG LINES OF COMMUNICATION AND A LESS

    CONCENTRATED TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THE TIME THAT ELAPSED BETWEEN

    FAILURE AND REPAIR COULD RESULT IN CROP DAMAGE.

    3. THE NEED FOR CONTINUOUS RECIRCULATION DEMANDED AN UNINTER-RUPTED SUPPLY OF ELECTRICAL POWER. WITHOUT RECIRCULATION OF THE

    NUTRIENT SOLUTION THE CROP WOULD VERY QUICKLY WILT AND DIE. THIS

    MEANT THAT AN AUTOMATIC START• STANDBY GENERATOR WAS ESSENTIAL TO

    KEEP THE PUMPS OPERATING IN THE EVENT OF A BREAKDOWN IN POWER SUPPLY.

    HOWEVER, THE AUTOMATIC START OF A STANDBY GENERATOR DEPENDS ON THE

    SUCCESSFUL OPERATION EVERY TIME OF A 12 VOLT BATTERY. THIS IS NOT A GOOD WEAK LINK ON WHICH TO BASE A LARGE FINANCIAL INVESTMENT.

    CONSEQUENTLY IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT, IN THE EVENT OF POWER FAILURE,

    ALARM CALLS SHOULD BE SENT IMMEDIATELY AND AUTOMATICALLY TO PERSONNEL

    SO THAT A CHECK CAN BE MADE THAT THE BATTERY HAS SUCCESSFULLY STARTED

    THE GENERATOR. THE SENDING OUT OF SEVERAL AUTOMATIC CALLS• IN CASE

    ONE PERSON IS NOT AT HOME, REQUIRES A TELEPHONE SYSTEM OVER WHICH THE

    ALARM CALLS CAN BE SENT. IN MANY COUNTRIES IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO GET A

  • 13

    TELEPHONE LINE INSTALLED TO THE SITE WHERE IT IS NEEDED. THIS

    REQUIREMENT FOR CONTINUOUS RECIRCULATION OF NUTRIENT SOLUTION

    REPRESENTED NO PROBLEM IN A SMALL COUNTRY LIKE ENGLAND WHERE THE

    POWER SUPPLY IS VERY RELIABLE AND THERE IS AN UBIQUITOUS TELEPHONE

    NETWORK. HOWEVER, IT WAS FELT THAT IN MUCH OF THE WORLD THE NEED FOR

    ELECTRICAL POWER REPRESENTED A LIMITATION TO THE USE OF CONVENTIONAL

    NFT.

    4. THE SUCCESSFUL PRODUCTION OF A CONVENTIONAL NfT CROP REQUIRES SKILLED MANAGEMENT. AGAIN THIS REPRESENTED NO PROBLEM IN ENGLAND

    WHERE THE HORTICULTURAL MANAGEMENT IS WELL EDUCATED AND IS SUPPORTED

    BY AN ADEQUATE ADVISORY SERVICE, BUT IT WAS FELT THAT IN MANY PARTS

    0~ THE WORLD THE NEED FOR SKILLED MANAGEMENT WOULD BE A LIMITATION TO

    THE WIDER SUCCESSFUL USE OF CONVENTIONAL NfT.

    THESE CONCLUSIONS WERE NOT IN ANY WAY INTENDED TO REPRESENT AN

    IMPLIED CRITICISM OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONVENTIONAL NfT. IT WAS SUC-

    CESSFULLY DEVELOPED FOR A VERY SPECIFIC PURPOSE- TO BE USED BY THE

    GLASSAHOUSE INDUSTRY IN THE CLIMATE OF ENGLAND UNDER ENGLISH

    CONDITIONS. OUTSIDE THAT CONTEXT PROBLEMS CAN ARISE.

    SLIDE 16

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS A VERY SIMPLE EXAMPLE OF WHAT CAN HAPPEN WHEN

    CONVENTIONAL NfT IS USED OUTSIDE THE CONTEXT FOR WHICH IT WAS

    DESIGNED. THIS IS A CONVENTIONAL NfT TOMATO CROP IN SOUTHERN SPAIN.

    THE HOT SUN HAS RAISED THE SURFACE TEMPERATURE OF THE POLYTHENE FILM

    OF THE CHANNELS WITH THE RESULT THAT THE ROOT TEMPERATURE HAS RISEN

    TO LEVELS WHICH THE PLANTS COULD NOT TOLERATE.

    THE EXISTENCE OF LIMITATIONS TO THE WI6ER USE OF CONVENTIONAL

    NFT, OF WHICH THE SLIDE ON THE SCREEN IS BUT ON EXAMPLE, LED ARIEL

    INDUSTRIES TO ERECT FOUR ACRES OF GLASS IN SOUTHERN ENGLAND TO

    SERVICE A RESEARCH PROGRAM.

    SLIDE 17

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE BUILDING OF THESE FACILITIES.

    SLIDE 18

  • 14

    AND THIS SLIDE SHOWS THAT BECAUSE THIS SITE ENJOYS, IF THAT IS

    THE RIGHT WORD, THE MILD ENGLISH CLIMATE ARIEL INDUSTRIES ALSO HAD TO

    ERECT SIMILAR FACILITIES IN THE HOTTER CLIMATE OF SOUTHERN SPAIN.

    SLIDE 19

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE SITE THAT WAS CHOSEN IN THE DESERT OF

    ALMERIA IN SOUTHERN SPAIN WHERE, INCIDENTALLY• NEARLY ALL THE CLASSIC

    WESTERNS WERE FILMED. IT WAS FELT THAT THE CONDITIONS WERE

    SUFFICIENTLY RUGGED AND THE RADIATION WAS SUFFICIENTLY INTENSE TO

    TEST THE DEVELOPMENT WORK UNDER HOSTILE CONDITIONS.

    IN ADDITION, ARTIFICIALLY LIT CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT CHAMBERS

    WERE BUILT IN THE UK TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS THAT COULD BE ASKED ONLY IN A CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT.

    THE AIM OF THE WORK THAT IS BEING DONE IN THESE FACILITIES IS

    NOT MERELY THEELIMINATION OF THE LIMITATIONS OF CONVENTIONAL NFT THAT

    I LISTED EARLIER BUT THE SIMPLIFICATION OF THE SYSTEM WITHOUT

    ACCEPTING ANY REDUCTION IN CROP PERFORMANCE. IN FACT, IT WAS ARGUED

    THAT SIMPLIFICATION WAS NOT INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE ACHIEVEMENT OF AN

    IMPROVEMENT IN CROP PERFORMANCE.

    THE WORK BEGAN BY MERELY ENDEAVORING TO IMPROVE AND SIMPLIFY

    CONVENTIONAL NFT AND A SYSTEM WAS DEVELOPED WHICH WAS CALLED •sECOND

    GENERATION NFT•. IN PRINCIPLE THIS WAS THE SAME AS CONVENTIONAL NFT

    BUT DIFFERED CONSIDERABLY IN DETAIL AND IT INCLUDED A NEW NUTRITIONAL

    METHOD WHICH WAS GIVEN THE NAME OF •HYPERTONIC FEEDING•.

    THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WERE INCORPORATED DEMANDED A PLANT WITH A ROOT

    SYSTEM DIVIDED INTO TWO PARTS AND THIS MEANT THAT THE PROPAGATION

    METHOD EMPLOYED FOR CONVENTIONAL NFT COULD NOT BE USE BECAUSE IT

    EMPLOYED A SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM IN THE FORM OF A PAPER POT FILLED

    WITH COMPOST, OR A ROCKWOOL CUBE. THUS, THE FIRST TASK WAS TO DEVELOP

    A SUITABLE PROPAGATION METHOD. THE METHOD THAT WAS ULTIMATELY FOUND

    TO BE SUITABLE FOR LARGE SCALE PROPAGATION WAS AS FOLLOWS.

    SLIDE 20

  • THE ROCKWOOL CUBE OR THE PAPER POT FILLED WITH COMPOST WAS REPLACED

    BY TWO SMALL PIECES OF CAPILLARY MATTING JOINED TOGETHER AT THE TOP

    TO FORM A PROPAGATION POCKET AS SHOWN IN THE SLIDE. THIS CHANGE IN

    THE MATERIALS USED REPRESENTS A FINANCIAL SAVING IN THE COST OF

    PROPAGATION MATERIALS OF ABOUT 700 POUNDS STERLING PER ACRE PER ANNUM.

    A SEED WAS PLACED IN THE TOP OF EACH MOISTENED GERMINATION POCKET AND THE POCKETS WERE PLACED ONE ON TOP OF ANOTHER IN A PLASTIC

    TRAY. THIS MEANT THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF POCKETS COULD BE PLACED IM A

    VERY SMALL TRAY. THESE TRAYS WERE THEN STACKED ONE ABOVE THE OTHER IN

    A WELL INSULATED GERMINATION. BOX THERMOSTATICALLY CONTROLLED AT THE

    OPTIMAL TEMPERATURE FOR THE GERMINATION OF THE SPECIES CONCERNED.

    BECAUSE A VERY LARGE NUMBER OF POCKETS COULD BE ACCOMMODATED IN A

    SMALL WELL INSULATED GERMINATION BOX• THE ENERGY COST OF MAINTAINING

    THE REQUIRE TEMPERATURE WAS VERY SMALL.

    SLIDE 21

    As SOON AS THE FIRST SIGNS OF GROWTH COULD BE SEEN IN THE GERMINATING SEED• THE POCKETS WERE REMOVED FROM THE DARKNESS OF THE

    BOX INTO THE LIGHT. IF THE CLIMATE IS SUCH THAT SUBSEQUENT AIR

    HEATING IS NOT REQUIRED THEN THE POCKETS CAN BE PLACED IMMEDIATELY IN

    THE FINAL GROWING POSITIONS IN THE CHANNELS. IF HEATING FUEL

    CONSERVATION IS IMPORTANT THEN THE POCKETS SHOULD BE PLACED AT CLOSE

    SPACING ON A PROPAGATION BENCH AS SHOWN ON THE SCREEN. IN THE SLIDE

    YOU CAN SEE A TRAY CONTAINING SEVERAL HUNDRED POCKETS AND THE POCKETS

    BEING PLACED ASTRIDE RIDGES ON A BENCH WHICH HAS A RIDGE AND FURROW

    CONFIGURATION; NUTRIENT SOLUTION IS CONTINUALLY RECIRCULATED DOWN THE

    FURROWS OF THE BENCH AND THESE ARE KEPT DARK BY PLACING A LONG,

    NARROW STRIP OF POLYTHENE FILM BETWEEN EACH PAIR OF RIDGES. VIRTUALLY

    NO FURTHER WORK IS REQUIRED UNTIL THE PLANTS ARE BIG ENOUGH TO BE

    PLACED IN THEIR FINAL GROWING POSITIONS IN THE CHANNELS. THUS THE

    LABOUR COSTS DURING PROPAGATION ARE VIRTUALLY ELIMINATED AND, EQUALLY

    IMPORTANT, NONE OF THE CONVENTIONAL MANAGEMENT DECISIONS HAVE TO BE

    MADE ABOUT WHEN TO WATER AND FEED AND HOW MUCH WATER AND FEED SHOULD

    BE APPLIED ON EACH OCCASION.

  • SLIDE 22

    THE PLANTS WILL GROW WELL AND UNIFORMLY• AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE

    SLIDE, WITH VERY LITTLE ATTENTION OTHER THAN MAINTAINING THE CORRECT

    NUTRITION IN THE CATCHMENT TANK.

    SLIDE 23

    THIS IS A CLOSE-UP SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THE WHITE-ON-BLACK STRIPS OF

    POLYTHENE FILM LAID BETWEEN THE PAIRS OF RIDGES OF THE PROPAGATION

    BENCH.

    SLIDE 24

    THIS SHOWS A YOUNG TOMATO PLANT REMOVED FROM THE PROPAGATION

    BENCH SO THAT THE DEVELOPING DIVIDED BARE-ROOT SYSTEM CAN BE SEEN.

    BECAUSE THERE IS VERY LITTLE SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM, A VERY LARGE

    NUMBER OF THESE PLANTS CAN BE LAID ALMOST ONE ON TOP OF EACH OTHER,

    IN A PLASTIC CARRYING TRAY FOR TRANSFER FROM THE PROPAGATION BENCH TO

    THEIR FINAL GROWING POSITIONS IN THE CHANNELS.THIS ELIMINATION OF THE

    WEIGHT AND BULK OF THE SOLID ROOTING MEDIUM REDUCES PLANTING COSTS.

    WHAT I HAVE SO FAR DESCRIBED IS THE PROPAGATION METHOD THAT WAS

    DEVISED TO ENABLE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE TOLERANCE TO DROWNING OF

    THE ROOT MAT TO BE INCREASED. THIS TOLERANCE WAS INCREASED BY

    CHANGING THE DESIGN OF THE METAL TRAYS ON WHICH THE POLYTHENE FILM

    CHANNELS WERE PLACED.

    SLIDE 25

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE DESIGN OF THE METAL TRAY. IT COMPRISES A

    CENTRAL RIDGE AND TWO SIDE CHANNELS. BECAUSE THIS CROSS-SECTIONAL

    SHAPE IS VERY STRONG IN BENDING• THE TRAYS CAN BE PLACED DIRECTLY ON

    THE GROUND OF A ROUGHLY PREPARED SLOPE AND THEY WILL BRIDGE ANY

    UNEVENNESS IN THE PREPARATION OF THE SLOPE AND PROVIDE A PERFECTLY

    SMOOTH SLOPE.

    SLIDE 26

  • As SHOWN IN THIS SLIDE, THE METAL TRAYS ARE OVERLAPPED LIKE ROOFING TILES STARTING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SLOPE.

    SLIDE 27

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS A COMPLETELY LAID ROW OF OVERLAPPING METAL

    TRAYS.

    SLIDE 28

    l7

    A SHEET OF WHITE-ON-BLACK POLYTHENE FILM IS THEN LAID ON THE METAL TRAYS AS SHOWN IN THE SLIDE. IN THIS PARTICULAR EXAMPLE, A WIDE

    STRIP OF POLYTHENE FILM HAS BEEN USED SO THAT AN AIR FILLED ROLL OF

    POOLYTHENE FORMS ABOVE EACH CHANNEL. THESE TWO ROLLS PROVIDE

    INSULATION AGAINST SOLAR RADIATION SO THAT THE OVERHEATING OF THE

    CHANNELS THAT YOU SAW IN AN EARLIER SLIDE DOES NOT OCCUR.

    SLIDE 29

    A STRIP OF CAPILLARY MATTING IS THEN LAID ON THE POLYTHENE THAT COVERS THE CENTRAL RIDGE AS YOU CAN SEE IN THIS SLIDE.

    SLIDE 30

    THE PLANTS IN THEIR PROPAGATION POCKETS WITH DIVIDED ROOT

    SYSTEMS ARE THEN PLACED ASTRIDE THE CENTRAL RIDGE AND THE EDGES OF

    THE POLLYTHENE FILM ARE CLIPPED TOGETHER BETWEEN THE PLANTS AS SHOWN

    IN THE SLIDE.

    SLIDE 31

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE END OF A CHANNEL OPENED UP SO THAT YOU CAN

    SEE THE INTERNAL DETAIL. THE NUTRIENT SOLUTION FLOWS DOWN ONE SIDE OF

    THE DIVIDED CHANNEL BUT THE DIVIDED ROOT SYSTEM DEVELOPS ON BOTH

    SIDES OF THE CENTRAL RIDGE COVERED WITH CAPILLARY MATTING. THIS

  • 18

    SEPARATES THE AQUEOUS AND GASEOUS PHASES OF THE ROOT ENVIRONMENT AND

    THERE IS NO LIMITATION TO THE FLOW RATE. THE TOLERANCE OF LESS THAN

    ONE CENTIMETRE DEPTH OF SOLUTION HAS BEEN INCREASED TO INFINITY AS IT

    IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DROWN THE ROOT SYSTEM BECAUSE WHEN THE SOLUTION IS

    FLOWING DOWN ONE SIDE OF THE CHANNEL, NUTRIENTS ARE BEING TAKEN UP BY

    THE ROOTS ON THAT SIDE OF THE CHANNEL WHILE OXYGEN DIFFUSES INTO THE

    ROOTS AND ETHYLENE DIFFUSES OUT OF THE ROOTS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE

    CHANNEL. THE PLANT ADAPTS TO THIS SITUATION AND EACH HAL,F OF THE ROOT

    SYSTEM IS CAPABLE OF SUPPLYING THE NEEDS OF THE WHOLE PLANT. THIS HAS

    BEEN DEMONSTRATED BY SUPPLYING RADIOACTIVE PHOSPHOROUS TO ONLY ONE

    SIDE OF THE ROOT SYSTEM AND MEASURING THE DISTRIBUTION OF RADIOACTIVE

    PHOSPHOROUS WITHIN THE PLANT.

    IN SECOND GENERATION NFT, THE COMPLEX MONITORING AND INJECTION

    EQUIPMENT FOR THE CONTROL OF ELECTRICAL CONDUCTANCE AND PH HAS ALSO

    BEEN ELIMINATED.

    SLIDE 32

    THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE MOST COMPLICATED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT (OTHER

    THAN THE RECIRCULATING PUMP) IN A SECOND GENERATION NFT SYSTEM. IT

    CONSISTS OF A PLASTIC BIN WITH A LENGTH OF NARROW BORE PLASTIC TUBING

    INSERTED THROUGH THE SIDE WALL NEAR THE BOTTOM OF THE BIN. THERE ARE

    THREE OF THESE BiNSo TWO FOR NUTRIENT STOCK SOLUTION AND ONE FOR

    DILUTE ACID. THEY ARE SITED ADJACENT TO THE END OF THE CATCHMENT PIPE

    FARTHEST AWAY FROM THE CATCHMENT TANKo AND THE NARROW BORE PLASTIC

    TUBES ARE INSERTED INTO THE CATCHMENT PIPE. THE QUANTITIES OF

    NUTRIENT STOCK SOLUTION AND THE QUANTITY OF ACID REQUIRED BY THE

    SYSTEM DURING THE COMING TWENTY FOUR HOURS ARE PLACED IN THE BINS

    EACH MORNING AND DRIP SLOWLY INTO THE CATCHMENT PIPE VIA THE NARROW

    BORE PLASTIC TUBES.

    WHAT I HAVE SO FAR DESCRIBED IS THE BASIC OUTLINE OF SECOND

    GENERATION NFT. THERE ISo HOWEVER, ONE VERY IMPORTANT COMPONENT THAT

    I HAVE NOT DESCRIBED, AND THIS IS HYPERTONIC FEEDING. IN HYPERTONIC

    FEEDING, BECAUSE THE MAJORITY OF THE PLANTS' ROOTS ARE BAREo THEY

    COULD HAVE A DILUTE NUTRIENT SOLUTION FLOWING PAST THEM FOR MOST OF

    EACH TWENTY FOUR HOURS. THIS WAS CALLED THE "DRINK" SOLUTION. ON

  • 19

    SEVEAL OCCASIONS EACH DAY THE DRINK SOLUTION WAS ALLOWED TO DRAIN

    BACK TO THEDRINK CATCHMENT TANK. A STRONG NUTRIENT SOLUTION (REFERRED

    TO AS THE FEED SOLUTION), IS THEN RECIRCULATED PAST THE PLANTS' ROOTS

    FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME, AFTER WHICH, IT IS ALLOWED TO DRAIN BACK

    TO THE FEED CATCHMENT TANK AND THE RECIRCULATION OF THE WEAKER DRINK

    SOLUTION IS RESUMED. THE INCORPORATION OF HYPERTONIC FEEDING INTO

    SECONND GENERATION NFT DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY COMPLEX CONTROL

    EQUIPMENT.

    SLIDE 33

    IT MERELY REQUIRES TWO CIRCULATING PUMPS INSTEAD OF ONE AND THE

    CONSTRUCTION OF TWO CATCHMENT TANKS AS SHOWN IN THE SLIDE INSTEAD OF

    ONE CATCHMENT TANK. THE CATCHMENT PIPE RETURNS ABOVE THE PARTY WALL

    BETWEEN THE TWO TANKS AND DISCHARGES INTO EITHER THE DRINK TANK OR

    THE SMALLER FEED TANK ACCORDING TO WHETHER THE FEED SOLUTION OR THE

    DRINK SOLUTION IS BEING RECIRCULATED.

    IT WAS FOUND THAT WHEN PLANTS WERE FED HYPERTONICALLY, THE

    UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS WAS INCREASED AND THAT THIS WAS ACCOMPANIED BY

    THE STOMATA REMAINING OPEN UNTIL LATER IN THE DAY AND BY INCREASES IN

    WATER UPTAKE, IN THE CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT OF THE LEAVES, IN THE RATE

    OF PLANT GROWTH AND IN YIELD.

    THIS FINDING THAT THE STOMATA REMAINED OPEN UNTIL LATER IN THE

    DAY AND THAT THE CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT OF THE LEAVES WAS INCREASED BY

    HYPERTONIC FEEDING HAS AN INTERESTING IMPLICATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION

    IN PLASTIC GREENHOUSES. IT IS SAID THAT THERE IS A REDUCTION IN LIGHT

    TRANSMISSION IF PLASTIC FILM IS USED INSTEAD OF GLASS TO CLAD A

    GREENHOUSE. THERE WOULD SEEM TO BE NO REASON WHY HYPERTONIC FEEDING

    CAN NOT BE USE TO OFFSET THE LIGHT REDUCTION BY KEEPING THE STOMATA

    OPEN LONGER AND INCREASING THE CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT OF THE LEAVES.

    ANOTHER FACILITY OF HYPERTONIC FEEDING IS THAT IT MAKES IT

    POSSIBLE TO STIMULATE ANY DESIRED NUTRIENT INPUT BECAUSE IT IS A TWO

    SOLUTION SYSTEM. IN A SINGLE SOLUTION SYSTEM, ION ANTAGONISM CREATES

    A LIMITATION TO INCREASING THE CONCENTRATION OF SOME ELEMENTS WHEN

    UPTAKE REQUIREMENTS ARE HIGH. THERE ARE VERY FEW TOMATO GROWERS WHO

  • 20

    ARE NOT FAMILIAR WITH THE SYMPTOMS OF MAGNESIUM DEFICIENCY OR WHO

    HAVE NOT SUFFERED FROM A DECLINE IN FRUIT QUALITY DUE TO AN

    INADEQUATE UPTAKE OF POTASSIUM. THE USE OF HYPERTONIC FEEDING WITH

    ITS TWO SOLUTIONS MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO AVOID ION ANTAGONISM BY

    SEPARATING THE ANTAGONISTIC IONS. IT IS NOT A GOOD PRACTICE TO HAVETO

    RESORT TO FOLIAR SPRAYING TO CORRECT INADEQUACIES IN NUTRIENT UPTAKE.

    IT IS BETTER TO CORRECT THE UPTAKE PATTERN BEFORE DEFICIENCY SYMPTOMS

    OCCUR BY MAKING PREVENTATIVE FORMULATION CHANGES. HYPERTONIC FEEDING

    PROVIDES A GREATER FACILITY FOR INTRODUCING FORMULATION CHANGES THAN

    IS POSSIBLE WITH A SINGLE SOLUTION SYSTEM.

    WHAT I HAVE DESCRIBED SO FAR IS THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONVENTIONAL

    NFT INTO SECOND GENERATION NFT. THE OBJECT, HOWEVER, OF DEVELOPING

    SECOND GENERATION NFT WAS NOT TO REPLACE FIRST GENERATION NFT, BVT TO

    LEAD INTO THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD OF FOOD PRODUCTION APPROPRIATE

    FOR THE THIRD WORLD. AND THIS I WILL LEAVE UNTIL MY SECOND TALK. THE

    DEVELOPMENT WORK THAT ARIEL INDUSTRIES HAS DONE ON BEHALF OF THE

    THIRD WORLD HAS ELIMINATED ANY TECHNICAL PROBLEMS IN SOLVING THEIR

    FOOD SUPPLY SITUATION AND IT HAS QUITE CLEARLY SHOWN THAT THE ONLY

    PROBLEMS REMAINING ARE POLITICAL. I WILL DEVELOP THIS THEME IN MY

    SECOND TALK.

  • AQUACULTURE: Another Hydroponic Technique?

    Thomas B. McCormick McCormick & Associates

    1211 Spruce Street Berkeley, CA 94709

    2l

    On the surface, aquaculture and hydroponics appear to

    be to be quite similar since they both deal with aquatic

    mediums in which animals and plants are cultivated. I

    would like to provide some background on aquaculture and how

    it may be relevant to hydroponics.

    AQUACULTURE

    Aquaculture is the farming and husbandry of

    and marine organisms. The practice is not new, but has been

    carried out for millennia. The cultivation of fish is well

    documented in the the records of ancient Chinese and

    Egyptian cultures. Oyster farms once thrived in Rome.

    Like agriculture, aquaculture arose as a means of

    supplementing wild stocks of aquatic fishes and plants.

    While agriculture has long surpassed hunting as a means of

    food production, aquaculture has only recently begun to

    produce significant quantities of food products on a

    worldwide basis. In recent years, capture fishery landings

    have leveled off at around 76 million metric tons (~1T).

    Over-exploitation of valuable species is parti'ally

    responsible for this plateau in the catch. Highly valued

  • 22

    species are subjected to greater fishing pressure as the

    world demand for fish increases. Production from worldwide

    aquaculture has grown 6X each year for the last decade to an

    annual total of 10 million MT today. This represents 12X of

    the totc

  • 23

    The cultivation of trout was begun in Europe more than

    200 years ago, when artificial spawning of this fish was

    first carried out. Today, trout are grown throughout the

    u.s. The most productive area, producing more than 90X of

    the fish, or 3,600 MT, is Idaho. Abundant sources of

    freshwater close to optimal temperatures (15.7 to 17.2 C,

    60.3 to 63 Fl are responsible for Idaho's dominance of the

    trout farming industry. These water resburces provide

    inexpensive temperature control, o>:ygenation and waste

    removal. Typically trout are raised in concrete raceways

    through which the water passes only once. A large trout

    farming operation may use

    minute.

    140 1 000 gallons of

    In addition to abundant clean water

    water per

    resources,

    manipulation of genetics and diet have contributed to the

    success of trout farming. Controlled breeding of

    generations of trout has resulted in fish that grow faster

    and to a greater dress out weight. Natural feeds have been

    replaced with specially formulated rations tailored to every

    size of trout. Food conver-siorl efficier1cies have been

    increased. Where it cnce took 2 pounds of feed to produce a

    pound of trout, it now takes 1.6 pounds of feed. In

    addition to the farming phase, the producers also control

    the processing, shipping and marketing of the fish. Trout

    is now a well established food item in both restaurants and

  • 24

    at home.

    Catfish is the modern day ugly duckling success story

    of the U. S. fish farming industry. In the last ten years,

    production of this outwardly unattractive fish has increased

    from 8,600 MT to 95,000 MT !total live weithtl in 1986. In

    Mississippi, where approximately 75% of the catfish are

    raised, 34,300 hectares (hal of ponds were in production by

    mid-1986. Like frout, the utilization of an abundant

    resource contributed heavily to the success of catfish

    farming. In this instance a new industry was born as

    farmers switched their skills and resources from cotton and

    rice crops to a fish crop.

    Today catfish are typically raised in dirt ponds 1.2m

    deep. Por1d size may vary, but in flat areas 8 ha ponds are

    most economical in terms of construction and management.

    Water must be supplied in quantities sufficient to fill

    ponds and to replace evaporative losses. A 3,785 gpm well

    is adequate to supply a 16 ha fish farm !Lee, 19811. New

    ponds are often fertilized to promote the growth of

    plankton, which aids in keeping oxygen

    reduces light levels at the pond bottom.

    in the water and

    Generally, 6-inch

    fingerlings stocked

    marketable size in

    in the spring will reach a 0.6kg

    18 months. Catfish production has

    increased from 300 kg/ha per year in unfed ponds to

    4,500kg/ha per year in ponds receiving supplemental feeds.

    Feeds are high protein 128 - 39%1 formulations that are

  • 25

    primarily composed of soybean meal, fish meal, and

    by-products from meat, poultry and grain processing. Feed

    conversion ratios from 1.5 to 1.8:1 can be obtained.

    Pond-side prices for whole fish range from $1.10 to $1.90

    per kilogram. The profit potential from harvests like these

    has stimulated researchers and farmers alike to quantify

    cultivation practices. #

    The environmental requirements of trout, catfish and

    other aquatic species are uniquely different. The fish

    farmer must be able to understand and accommodate these

    differences if successful cultivation is to be accomplished.

    Table 1 shows a list of physical

    considered when raising catfish.

    parameters which must be

    Similar lists should be

    constructed for other aquatic animals prior to commercial

    cultivation. Care must be taken to accommodate the changing

    environmental requirements as the organism moves from one

    stage of its life cycle to the next .

    • POLYCULTURE: A multi-species approach to fish farming.

    The creation of a vast irrigation system for the

    production of rice in China, 1,000 years before the birth of

    Christ, produced two additional side effects which are still

    being felt today. One of these effects is the ever present

    bureaucracy, which has spread to all nations. The other

    side effect, called polyculture, is an system of aquatic

    farming where several fish species are raised together,

  • 26

    TABLE 1. CHANNEL CATFISH

    ENVIRONMENTAL CRITERIA SUMMARY

    Item Acceptable Range Optimum

    TEMPERATURE

    Spawning Zl-Z9°C Z7-Z8°C Hatching zz-zs Z6-Z8 Growth Z0-30 ZB-30

    . Survival 0-34 ' ' --OXYGEN CONCENTRATION

    Hatching 6-7 mg/1 7 mg/1 Growth 3-7 5-7 mg/1 Survival (Short term) 1.0-Z.O -

    TOTAL DISSOLVED GAS PREssuRE

    less than Eggs and Fry 101% saturation 100% saturation

    less than Adults 106% saturation 100% saturation

    lJGHT INTENSITY

    Fry 1,000-10,000 lux -WATER QUALITY CONSTITUENTS

    Ammonia less than 0.05 mg/1 --Nitrite less than 0.1 mg/1 --Nitrate less than 50 mg/1 --Copper less than 0.01 mg/1 --Zinc less than 0.01 mg/1 --Iron

    Eggs and Fry less than 0.1 mg/1 --Adults less than 1.0 mg/1 --

    Total Dissolved Solids 100-ZOOO mg/1 --pH 6-9 7.5

  • 27

    often with supplemental

    terrestrial agriculture.

    inputs from aquatic plants and

    Today, polyculture is practiced

    throughout much of the Asian continent. In China,

    production from freshwater polyculture is estimated at 1.5

    million t·1T,

    pt-oduct ion.

    equivalent to 21% of the world aquaculture

    Carp cultivation is a typical example of Chinese

    polyculture. In this technique dirt ponds are stocked with

    three species of fish, 20% of which are grass carp, 30% are

    bighead and silver carps and 50% are mud and common carps.

    Grass carp feed on aquatic macrophytes and land grass.

    Bighead and silve~ carps are plankton feeders. t1ud and

    common carps are bottom feeders. Each group of fish

    utilizes a different food resource and inhabits a different

    portion of the water column. The result is reduced

    competition for both food and space, and ma:-: i mi zed

    production. The introduction of unwanted wild fish is

    controlled by the addition of a few carnivorous fist1, such

    as the snakehead.

    Nutrient inp(Jts into the pond are grass, pig manure and

    grain by-products. Grass is cultivated around the pond and

    serves as a food source for the grass carp. The waste from

    the grass carp~ in addition to the pig manure, fertilizes

    the pond waters, resulting in plankton blooms which feed the

    bighead and silver carp. Along with the pig manure, wastes

    from the grass carp, bighead and silver carp, settle to the

  • 28

    pond bottom where they serve as food for the common and mud

    car-ps. Additional grain by-products may be added as a food

    supplement.

    Nutrients are recycled back from the pond in two ways.

    in

    canals leading to and from the fish ponds, remove excess

    nutrients. These plants are regularly harvested and fed to

    the pigs. Second, 'between fish crops, the nutrient-rich

    sediments from the pond bottoms are spread on the pond banks

    where they act as fertilizer for the grass.

    Constant recycling of nutrients within the system

    maximizes fish and pig production and reduces the polluting

    effects of this intensive farming method on the surrounding

    aquatic ecosystems. At 6,000kg per year

  • nutrients are retained for additional production.

    The path of the predominant fish waste, nitrogen,

    29

    is of

    importance to both aquaculture and hydroponics, and will be

    reviewed het-e.

    Nitrogen is the most toxic metabolic by-product in

    aquatic systems, it enters the system from organic sources

    that are processed in two ways. First, bacteria may convert

    food to amino acids and then to keto acids in the m:id'ative

    process of ammonification CStanier et al., 1970). Second,

    food ingested and assimilated by aquatic animals is

    catabolized for energy, and ammonia is released from the

    deamination of amino acids, see Figure 1. (Armstrong, 1979).

    Ammonia nitrogen CNH3 -Nl is most toxic to fish.

    more than 0~05 mg/1 NH 1 -N are generally

    Levels of

    considered

    hazardous. Fortunately this toxic molecule is utilized as

    an energy source by autotrophic, aerobic bacteria (genus

    In the process of nitrification, ammonia

  • 30

    ORGANIC NITROGEN

    -PROTEIN-

    (rooo,nAD UlMUS INO PLANTS )

    ,

  • 31

    the fish. Ammonia may e>:ist as NHj or- NH!( ammonium ion.

    Nitr-ite might exist as NDz or- HN0 1 , nitr-ous acid. pH

    deter-mines the degr-ee to which the nitr-ogen molecules ar-e

    ionized. Gener-ally, the un-ionized, non-polar- for-m of

    ammonia is most toxic (Ar-mstr-ong, 1979). Tables have been

    calculated to help deter-mine NH3 :NH'f pr-opor-tions (Tr-ussel,

    Gr-eater-1972; Skar-heim, 1973; and Emer-son et al., 1975).

    amounts of ammonia exist as NH 3 when pH r-ises simply because

    less H is available.

    pr-opor-tion ten fold.

    An incr-ease of 1 pH unit r-aises the NH5

    Thus a lower- pH would decr-ease NH'

    toxicity to fish. As pH dr-ops, the pr-opor-tion of toxic

    un-ionized nitr-ite (nitr-ous acid, HND2. increases.

    For-tunately, nitr-ite is only one half as toxic as ammonia.

    The toxic effects of ammonia and nitr-ite ar-e attributed to

    changes in blood pH and inter-fer-ence with oxygen and sodium

    tr-anspor-t. Sublethal levels of ammonia, nitr-ite and nitr-ate

    will decr-ease fish gr-owth.

    As we saw earlier in our example of fish far-ming in

    .China, polycultur-e can combine fish cultivation with a for-m

    of hydr-oponics to incr-ease pr-oduction, r-ecycle nutr-ients and

    r-educe pollution. In the United States ther-e exists nb

    integrated fish and plant cultivation.

    However-, in the last decade resear-ch has begun on the use of

    fish and plants together-

    aquatic systems.

    in a small car-efully managed

    The simplest appr-oach to cultivation fish and plants is

  • 32

    shown in Figure 2. This system, described by Zweig (1986)

    calls for the cultivation of hydroponic vegetables (lettuce)

    on a floating substrate with fish below. An air space above

    the water allows the roots access to atmospheric oxygen.

    Screening below the plants protects the fish from consuming

    the roots. Small lettuce seedlings, started at the center

    of the substrate, are moved outward for more room during the

    six week growout period. Harvest of 18 heads of

    Buttercrunch lettuce (450 gml per week was obtained. The

    clear sides of the tank permit solar radiation to enter,

    providing heat and energy for the growth of phytoplankton.

    Some oxygenation is provided by the algae during the day.

    Additional oxygen is provided by submerged air diffusers.

    The large volume of water acts as a heat reservoir when the

    system is placed in a greenhouse. Blue tilapia

    were stocked in the tanks. To

    supplement their diet of phytoplankton, the fish were also

    fed trout chow and rabbit feed. Feed conversion ratios

    averaged 1.75:1. Regular analyses of water chemistry

    revealed that the mineralization of NH 3 to NO~ and N0 3

    occurred and that these components were well below levels

    toxic to the fish. Plants removed 28X of nitrogen from the

    system.

    Several difficulties are encountered with this type of

    system~ Root masses may become so large and clogged with

    detritus that they turn anerobic, resulting in root death.

  • ~~~~~r~~~~ ~w~r®~®~~c~ IF U i;3!m Cl\ll U itlYir~ ~W~ttc;!JW

    A. Hydr:oponic vegetables on top of pond.

    B. Styrofoam flotation and guides forplants.

    C. Central core opening for fish feeding.

    D. Mesh cage to prevent fish from eating plant roots. E. Fish rearing area in pond.

    FIGURE 2. Integrated Hydroponic Fish Culture System ( Z wei g , 1 986) •

    33

  • 34

    The build-up of sediments on the bottom may lead to

    anerobic conditions which adversely affect the fish and

    increase maintenance. pH may vary depending upon the growth

    of the phytoplankton community. A variation of this design

    has been tested

  • t

    l

    35

    __ JL

    \ r I \ J I ' I I

    'I II I I

    Figure 3. Modified tank cultivation system with rotating biofilter and clarifier .

  • 36

    cultivation with a more recognizable hydroponic layout is

    shewn in Figures 4 and This system, developed by Lewis

    et al.

  • AGITATOR

    FISH TANK

    AGITATOR

    FISH TANK

    . .

    1 meier

    SCALE

    INDOORS~ OUTDOORS I I I

    PLAN VIEW 1 I I SETTLING

    : TANK

    I I

    37

    r-~~~~--~=-----------~0

    IIOFILTER

    EQUALIZING RESERVOIR

    ELEVATION VIEW

    WATER TO FISH TANK

    IIOFILTER

    I I I

    RELIFT PUMP

    BYPASS

    HYDROPONIC TANKS

    SUMP (WALLS PERFORATED)

    I 1,------,

    ----~: ~~==~~~~.

    EMERGENCY 1----fl OXYGEN

    (SEE DETAIL B)

    EQUALIZING RESERVOIR

    : SETTLING TANK ~~.-----------~~

    AUTOMATIC HYDROPONIC VALVE

    TANKS (SEE DET All A)

    FigurE 4. A fish production systEm involving biofiltration and plants grown hydroponically. From Lewis et al. (1980).

  • 38 DETAIL A

    t

    RUBBER BALL

    PRESSURE REDUCING

    VALVE -........_

    OXYGEN SUPPLY TO FISH TANKS

    ON-OFF VALVE

    ~

    0 2 CYLINDER

    FLEXIBLE CONNECTION

    WEIGHT

    DETAIL B

    TO FISH TANK-----,.---- BYPASS

    EQUALIZING RESERVOIR

    Figure 5. Details of fish-hydroponic system from Lewis, et al.

  • 39

    suggested that this system would also have application in

    combination with a single-pass fish culture system, where

    it could be used to reduce waste products to levels

    permissible for discharge.

    The examples g~ven here demonstrate that aquaculture

    ·and hydroponics can be combined to increase production,

    recycle nutrients and reduce pollution. Only a few

    combinations of plants and animals have been tried thus

    far, and there is great potential for the imaginative

    combination of these two cultivation techniques.

    REFERENCES

    Armstrong, D. A., 1979. Nitrogen toxicity to crustacea and aspects of its dynamics in culture systems. Proc. Second Biennial Crustacean Health Workshop. Texas A & M Sea Grant. TAMU-SG-79-114.

    Bardach, J. E., J. H. Ryther and W. 0. McLarney, 1972. 69Y!£YltYC§· Wiley-Interscience. 86Bpp.

    Burgoon, P. S. and Baum, 1984. Year round fish and vegetabl~ production in a passive solar greenhouse. Sixth Inti. Congress on Soilless Culture, Lunteren, Proceedings, Intl. Soc. for Soilless Culture, 151-171.

    Conrad, J., 1985. Trout Farming in Idaho. Aquaculture Magazine, 11111:32-36.

    Emerson, K., R. C Russo, R. Lund and R. V. Thurston., 1975. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effects of pH and temperature. J. Fish. Res. Board Can., 32:241-246.

  • 40

    Zweig, R. D., 1986. Fish farming wizardry: Tt1e practices cJf t-1r~. Chen Yie Zhao. Aquaculutre Ma9azine. 12(5):25-27.

    Lee, J. S. 1981. Commer-cial Cat·fist1 Eelt::!!ltQg. The Inter-state Pr-inter-s & Publisher-s, Inc., 312 pp.

    Lewis, W. M. and G. L. Buynak, 1976. Evaluation of a r-evolving plate type biofilter- for- use in r-ecir-culated fish pr-oduction holding units. Tr-ans. Am. Fish. Soc., 105(6):704-708.

    Lewis, W. M, J. H. Yopp, H. L. Schr-amM, Jr-. and A. M. Br-andenbur-g, 1978. Use of hydr-oponics to maintain quality of Recir-culated water- in a fish cultur-e system. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., 107(1):92-99.

    Lewis, W. H., J. H .. Yopp, A.M. Br-andenbur-g and K.D. Schnoor-, 1980. On the maintenance of water- quality for- closed fish pr-oduction systems by means of hydr-oponically gr-own vegetable cr-ops. Symp. of New Developments in the Utilization of Heated Effluents and Recir-culation Systems for- Intensive Aquacultur-e, Stavanger- 1 Nor-way 28-30 May 1980.

    Rakocy J. M. and R. Allison, 1981. Evaluation of a closed r-ecir-culating system for- the cultur-e of tilapia and aquatic macr-ophytes. Bio-Engineer-ing Symp. for- Fish Cultur-e. Am. Fish. Soc.

  • Introduction

    Hydroponics in Research

    S. R. Grattan, Ph.D Plant-Water Relations Specialist University of California, Davis

    41

    Hydroponics has been perhaps the most important research tool in the study of plant nutrition and physiology. It has provided us with, for example (1) the knowledge of the origin of plant constituents and the elements and amounts essential to plants, (2) a basic understanding of plant-water relations and the transport of water, gases, and nutrients within the plant, and (3) has. provided an ideal growth media for the study of plant response under environmental stresses (drought, salinity, toxics, nutrients, oxygen, temperature, disease, etc.). The creative uses of hydroponics in research depends largely upon the innovative nature of the scie9tist. Although numerous hydroponic studies have been published , much is yet to be learned with regards to factors and interactions among factors that influence plant performance. No doubt hydroponics will remain an important vehicle on the road to a better understanding of · plant physiology in the future.

    History of Hydroponics

    Centuries before hydroponics was used on a research tool, records indicate that ancient civilizations grew plants in soilless cultures. Particular examples of these ancient hydroponic cultures are the hanging gardens of Babylon or the floating gardens of the Aztecs of Mexico (Resh, 1983). It was not until the 1600's that two classical experiments were conducted that set the stage for the science of hydroponics.

    In 1600, Belgian Jan Van Helmont conducted an experiment with a willow tree to obtain an understanding of the origin of plant constituents. He planted a 5-pound willow tree in a container filled with 200 pounds .of soil. Care was exercised so that no soil was added or lost from the container. The tree was watered for 5 years before it was separated from the soil. The tree gained 160 pounds while the soil lost only 2 ounces. He concluded that the tree was made up primarily of constituents from the water and not the soil. He did not account for contributions from atmospheric carbon dioxide.

    In 1699, John Woodward grew spearmint in rain water, river water, and conduit water. In one treatment, he added garden

    ·mold. He found that plant growth was largest in water that contained the most soil. He concluded that plants are made up of constituents in the water derived from soil and not water alone.

    See Bibliography of the literature on soilless culture (2nd ed). Compiled by the Department of Soilless Culture of the National Council for Agricultural Research T.N.O. The Netherlands.

  • 42

    More than 100 years later, as our understanding of chemistry developed, DeSaussure (1804) suggested that plants are composed of chemical constituents from the air, the soil, and the water. This proposition was confirmed by Jean Boussingault in 1851. In his experiment, chemicals of known composition were added to water to irrigate plants grown in sand, quartz, and charcoal. He concluded that plants are composed of oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon obtained from the soil water and the atmosphere. He also suggested that the plants are made of nitrogen and other minerals.

    Prior to the United States Civil War, German plant physiologists, Sachs (1860) and Knop (1861) conducted and documented the first ture hydroponic study i.e. the growth of plants in water that contained nutrient elements in the absence of a solid matrix. They showed that normal plant growth could be achieved by growing plants in a solution that contained nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg). Furthermore, Sachs concluded that the entire life cycle of the plant could be achieved and the plant could produce viable seeds.

    The complete assembly of Sachs hydroponic culture i" illustrated in Figure 1. This is a reproduction of Sach~ illustration (1887). The plant is supported by a perforated cor~ (K) and the roots are bathed in the nutrient solution (N). Thi~ simple technique is still used by many scientists today.

    Figure 1 • Hydroponic apparatus used by Sachs. a reproduction from Sachs, Lectures Plants, Clarendon Press, 1887.

    This figure on Physiology

  • As time progressed, plant physiologists found, with the use of hydroponics, that plants also required small amounts of other elements such as iron (Fe), chlorine (Cl), manganese (Mn), boron (B), zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), and molybdenun (Mo). By the mid 1950's, all nutrients known today to be essential for plant growth and reproduction were found.

    Nutrient solution compositions have been reported in the literature since Sachs in 1860 (Table 1).

    Table 1. Composition of nutrient solutions used by early plant physiologists (after Hoagland and Arnon, 1938).

    43

    Sachs' Solution (1860)

    Knop's Solution (1865)

    Pfeffer's Solution Crone's Solution (1900) (1902)

    nutrient grams/ nutrient _grams/ nutrient grams/ nutrient grams/ salt liter salt liter salt liter salt liter

    KN0 3 1.0

    Ca 3(P04) 2 0.5

    MgS04.7H 2o 0.5

    Caso4

    NaCl

    0.5

    0.25

    Trace

    Ca(N03 ) 2

    KN0 3 KH 2Po4

    0.8

    0.2

    0.2

    MgS04.1H20 0.2 KH 2P04

    FePo4 Trace KCl

    Fec1 3

    0.8

    0.2

    0.2

    0.2

    small amount

    Knop (1865) suggested a nutrient solution that was used widely in many plant nutrition studies. Since then other formulas for nutrient solutions have been proposed by Tollens (1882), Schimper (1890), Pfeffer (1900), Crone (1902), Tohinghorn (1914) Shive (1915), Hoagland (1920), Trelease (1933), Arnon (1938), and Robins (1946). Although all these nutrient solutions differ in nutrient concentration, plant physiologists recognized that no one solution was ideal for all plants grown under all environmental conditions. Furthermore, Sachs (1860) indicated that the quantity of various types of salts used in solution culture could vary widely without an apparent change in plant

    ·performance.

    Since early investigators suggested various nutrient solutions, nutrient solution-modification Perhaps the most widely used nutrient solutions physiology studies are those reportedly by Hoagland (1938) or dilutions and slight modifications thereof.

    types of continued. in ·plant and Arnon

    1.0

    0.25

    0.25

    0.25

  • Applications of Hydroponics in Research

    Hydroponics is best known for its invaluable contribution as a research aide in plant nutrition studies. However, it has been a useful tool in basic physiology studies since it provides a controlled environment where one or more variables can be readily changed. Most frequently studied are vegetable, agronomic, and horticultural plants but hydroponics has been used successfully to study the entire plant kingdom from green algae to large vascular plants such as mature trees. All factors that influence plant growth has been studied, at least for some extent, with the use of hydroponics [e.g. mineral nutrition, pH, aeration, toxics (organic and inorganic), microbes (pathological and symbiotic), nematodes, "-soil" strength, water stress, salinity, hormones and bioregulators, etc.]. I will discuss selected applications to each of these to which I am familiar. The reader should note that these are not all the types of research studies conducted with hydroponics, but should gain an appreciation for the diversity of studies conducted. Since each factor that effects plant growth directly br indirectly effects other factors, ~here are a multitude of potential studies that could be conducted.

    Mineral Nutrition

    As indicated earlier in this paper, hydroponics is best claimed to fame for its aide in improving our understanding of mineral nutrition in plants. Scientists from earliest studies had determined the essential macronutrients (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and S as well as the quantities needed for growth. Micronutrients (B, Fe,Cu, Mn, Zn, and Cl) essential for plants were discovered later.

    Solution cultures have been extremely valuable for growing plants without an essential element in the substrate to observe nutrient deficiency symptoms. These symptoms were then correlated with the nutrient content in the plant. Since plants can be grown successfully in various soil types, it is not surprising that optimal nutrient concentrations in nutrient solutions have wide ranges. It w.as found that plants differ with respect to nutrient requirements even at the variety level. Furthermore, the nutrient requirement often change with plant age and plant quality and plant phenology can be influenced by varying the nutrient composition without influencing optimal grO\vth.

    Hydroponic cultures commonly have nutrient concentrations unlike those found in the soil solutions. This is done so that

    ·nutrient solutions are not rapidly depleted of an essential nutrient. For example, P and K in the hydroponics is very high with respect to that found in the soil solution. The reason for the difference is that P and K once absorbed by the plant from the hydroponic solution is not replaced by a solid phase, as it is in soils. Also, the movement of these elements in· soils is much slower (movement by diffusion) than in hydroponics (movement

  • by mass flow). Certain researchers have attempted to grow plants in solutions that are similar in composition and concentration to that in soil solutions. To accomplish this, large volumes of solution were required. Currently, there are scientists (Bloom, Caldwell, for example) that use smaller vo_lumes and closely monitor nutrient uptake and automatically replenish the absorbed nutrient(s) to maintain a particular concentration. These culture systems are quite elaborate but can provide a substantial amount of useful information.

    Much work has been done with hydroponics to study root uptake, translocation, and distribution of nutrients. It was found that the rate of nutrient uptake was not linear with the concentr'ation of the nutrient solution. Rather the rate increased rapidly at low concentration and increased progressively slower as concentration increased (Figure 2). These uptake patterns were analogous to Michaelis-Menten enzyme kinetics.

    NUTRIENT UPTAKE RATE

    ------------------------

    Nutrient Concentration >

    Figure 2. Influence of nutrient concentration on the rate of nutrient uptake.

    45

  • lf6

    Since the root media can readily be controlled, interactions of nutrients may be studied. For example, it was found that calcium stimulates potassium uptake at least after two hours (Viets, 1944). Furthermore, calcium is essential for selective nutrient absorption (Epstein, 1961).

    Root Growth/Water Use/Water Deficits

    Although root morphology in solution cultures is different from that in soils, hydroponics does allow easy root measurements. Plant water use can easily be determined by measuring the volume of water lost in the container by transpiration by the plant. All roots can be removed from the solution, washed, spun in a centrifuge to a constant fresh weight, dried and analyzed for various organic and inorganic constituents. Total weights of plants can be obtained and ratios of shoot to root weights may be calculated. Total root length can be measured with patience or it can be estimated. One scientist at the University of California, Davis constructed a device to measure root elongation of an actively growing root by carefully attaching a thin nylon line to a small weight which was attached to the root tip.

    Certain large molecular components such as polyethylene glycol (PEG 8000) has been added to solution cultures to simulate drought. There are numerous controversies over these components in terms of breakdown, toxicities, etc.

    Other water stress studies have been conducted in sand cultures since the plant observed water deficits is more realistic. Furthermore, water holding capacity of many sands are low and water stress can be obtained quickly.

    Temperature

    Hydroponics allows scientists to study the influence of temperature on plant performance. For example, one could examine plant growth (roots, shoots, leaf area, internode length, etc.) by varying root temperatures. Minimal, optimal, and maximal temperatures can be defined for various plants under various conditions. The effects of changing temperature on various plant processes (water uptake, nutrient uptake, respiration, photosynthesis, tolerances to other stresses, etc.) may be and has been studied. Also, the influence of temperature on phenological responses (e.g. flowering) can easily be studied. Under controlled environmental conditions one can change both root and shoot temperature simultaneously and measure various plant processes.

    Aeration and pH

    The need to provide oxygen to the roots to maintain respiration and adjust the pH (an indication of the acidity or basicity of the solution) in an optimal range in order to optimize plant performance was known for many years. Scientists

  • have conducted studies under different red-ox potentials by bubbling different gasses [nitrogen (N2), oxygen (02), and air (primarily N2 , o2 , and co2 )J to study plant growth, nutrient and water uptake, respiration, etc. Some plant biochemists believe that roots grown in solution cultures as well as in soils of all textural and structural classes are limited, to some extent, with oxygen. They feel the o2 solubility is insuffient in solution culture and 02 diffusion in soils limits the rate of supply to the roots. Aeroponics has been suggested as a solution culture method to overcome this limitation.

    The pH of most solution cultures in research studies are maintained between 5.5 and 6.5. Many studies have e~amined

    3pH

    and species of the nutrient (e.g. H3Po4, H2Po4-, HP04 -, P04 -) in regards to plant pre~erence i~ uptake. Other species have also been examined (Fe + vs Fe + or NH4+ vs No 3-). Some scientists use a mixture of NH4+ and No 3- (e.g. 10-20# NH4+ and 80-90% No 3-) to ''buffer" the solution from pH change. Often the pH will . increase if anion uptake exceeds cation uptake since solution cultures are poorly buffered.

    Salinity/Taxies

    Hydroponics has been a valuble tool in salinity and toxic constituent studies. However, the use of hydroponics to predict absolute performance under field conditions has not been extremely helpful since environmental conditions are quite different. Nevertheless, hydroponic studies provide important information with regards to relative performance. For example barley and cotton are more salt tolerant than tomatoes and melons which are more tolerant than beans. Hydroponics also provide us with an understanding of ''how'' salinity effects plants. Growth reduction in most cases are caused primarily by the amounts of salts rather than the type ~f salts. Certain scientists have examined the influence of environmental factors on salt tolerance (e.g. nutrition, temperature, aeration, relative humidity ozone, carbon dioxide (C02 ), etc.). The relative salt tolerance, for example, was found to increase in plants exposed to ozone while the absolute tolerance was found to increase in plants exposed to elevated co 2 levels. Although hypothesize by several scientists, I have not seen any evidence of improved salt tolerance by nutrient addition. Furthermore, nutrient concentrations optimal for plant growth under non-saline conditions may not be optimal under saline conditions. My Ph.D. dissertation addressed a salinity induced phosphorus toxicity in certain soybean varieties. The influence of toxic constituents on plant uptake, distribution and plant performance has been studied extensively

    . with the use of hydroponics. Toxic elements such as Lithium, Boron, Aluminum, Arsinic, Chromium, Molybdenum, Lead, Cadmium, and Mercury are examples. Hydroponics has helped scientists learn which factors (e.g. temperature, speciation, salinity, red-ox, etc.) influence toxic availability to the plant. Other scientists label certain pesticides with carbon 14 to obtain an understanding of their fate within the environment. Sand cultures has been useful in these studies.

    47

  • LJS

    Bacteria/Fungus

    Hydroponics has been a usual research tool in the study of pathological and symbiotic microorganisums in relation to plants. Both sand and solution cultures have been used. Those systems have been valuble to study the mechanism of infection, the factors that influence infection, crop response, etc.

    "Soil" Strength and Plant Growth

    Surprizingly, hydroponics has been used to study the effect of soil strength on root growth. Figure 3 shows an apparatus by Goss (1977) designed to study this effect. Plants were grown in containers (cells) filled with glass spheres and were irrigat~d with aerated nutrient solution. The walls of the cell containing the glass beads consisted of a flexible impervious polyester material. These cells were submerged into water subjected to various external pressures and root elongation was measured. ·

    \

    \'

    .~0

    F

    Figure 3. Apparatus used by Goss (1977) to measure the influence of applied soil pressure (simulated soil strength) on root growth. ''I'' and ''0'' are inflow and outflow tubes for nutrient solution. The frame (F) and top (T) hold the membranes (m) in place, (picture from Russell, 1977).

  • Role of Hydroponics in Future Research

    As indicated in the sections above, hydroponics has been used to study the many factors that effect plants, Since there are many factors that influence plant performance, one can envision a multitude of experiments that could be conducted. For example, a study on the influence of a disease infection under saline condition~ at various temperatures or o2 levels could be conducted. The same experimental design could then be repeated with another piant. The combinations appear endless. Therefore innovative scientists will continue to design solution culture, sand culture and aeroponic culture systems to test a multitude of hypotheses that remain untested.

    Growing plants in space is an interesting concept not only to scientists but to the general public as well. If scientists were to live for long times in space (either at a space station or long distance travel (e.g. flights to Mars) growing plants as a ·source of food become more attractive than transporting large quantitie~ of food. Hydroponics could play an important role. New doors in hydroponics research can be opened. Unrealistic environment situations now become realist (e.g. high intensity light, elevated co2 levels, extented photoperiods, manipulated temperatures, simulated gravity, etc.). Growing selected plants, valuble from a nutritional and taste perspective, under controlled environmental conditions is currently being addressed (e.g. NASA-Controlled Ecological Life Support Systems), Aeroponics is being used to grow plants in tightly sealed growth chambers. Interest in aeroponics is high since it would require a smaller volume of water than NFT or deep water cultivars (hence less weight). Record harvests will undoubtedly be set with high density planting under these controlled conditions. Although these systems will be open with respect to energy, they will be closed with respect to mass. Although recycling mass is conceptually simple, disease control and the change of elements from available to unavailable forms must first be overcome.

    It is clear that hydroponics is not a worn-out rather a tool in which new uses are constantly being No doubt research with hydroponics will continue facinating future.

    tool but conceived.

    to have a

    49

  • 50 Marketing Hydroponically Grown Products

    Robert W. Munyon

    The topic assigned to me for your meeting may suggest that marketing hydroponically grown products is somehow different from marketing commodities grown in more conventional ways. Conceptionally there isn't too much to differentiate between what the larger commercial grower and the smaller grower must do to get his product from the field or greenhouse into the kitchen.

    While the fundamentals may be the same, you can expect to see the successful hydroponic grower involved in many more marketing and sales activities and processes than the typical larger commerical grower. The so called commercial grower typically will sell to only one or two buyers. The hydroponic grower typically will, or should, sell to a larger number of buyers. Generally he won't have as much volume to market; often he may have more items to sell. He probably is not too well mechanized. He's got to be good at selling his products to get the top dollar.

    The hydroponic grower and the commercial grower may use the same nuts and bolts in developing marketing and sales plans, but the hydroponic grower will usually have a more diversified marketing activity.

    The commercial grower usually sells to a middle-man or broker but seldom reaches the consumer directly. The hydroponic grower may be more likely to reach the consumer with his product(s) and may also sell additionally to retail outlets and/or brokers.

    As I use the term "hydroponically grown," I refer to the many faceted cultural practices as usually conducted in environmentally controlled greenhouses. The culture may be in beds of rock or sand, bags, peat, shavings, oasis bags, shredded bark, NFT, rockwool, etc. Soilless culture entrepreneurs will probably come up with even more new growing media as long as it provides a friendly home for the plants' roots.

    If you, the grower, can supply your plants with the proper nutrition, maintain them in a friendly climatic environment, free, or nearly free, of insects and diseases, you should be a successful grower. The plants don't really care too much which kind of media you employ as lo