ehighway range cost per km efficiency wtw example vehicle electric road systems 60 km 19 ct/km 77%...

eHighwayElectrified heavy duty road transport

siemens.comUnrestricted © Siemens AG 2018

Unrestricted © Siemens AG 201820.04.2018 Grünjes / MO TI EH

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of road freight transport arebecoming an increasing challenge for the decarbonization

1) Prognosticated growthin road freight transport

• Global road freight transport is going togrow by 300% between 2015 and 2050

• In Germany road freight transport grewbetween 2015 and 2016 by 2.8%

3) Reductions goals ofGHG-emissions by 2050

• Economy wide goal of the Germangovernment: reduction by 80% to 95%(basis 1990)

• Transport-sector: reduction of 98%necessary

2) Modal split of freighttransport in 2050

• German freight approx. 60% on road• By using the maximum of shift potentials,

rail freight is growing up to 30% by 2050

4) Transport sector as GHG-emitter

• 20% of all GHG-emissions generated bytransport sector

• Increase by 5.4m tons emissions inGermany`s transport sector in 2016

Sources: Klimaschutzbeitrag des Verkehrs bis 2050, Umweltbundesamt, Texte 56/2016, Juni 2016;Erarbeitung einer fachlichen Strategie zur Energieversorgung des Verkehrs bis zum Jahr 2050, Umweltbundesamt, Texte 72/2016, November 2016

ITF Transport Outlook 2017, Januar 2017Umweltbundesamt, Pressemitteilung Nr. 09 vom 20.03.2017

TheChallenge


Compatible with existinginfrastructure

System is safe, reliable and easy tomaintain

Long lifecycle

Compatible with other alternativefuel technologies

Compatible for freight- andpassenger transport

Able to achieve 100%decarbonization

High efficiency Economical

Little to no impact on standardoperation

Scalable andinteroperable

Thesolution

Requirements for the optimal solution for decarbonizationof road freight transport


eHighwayHow it works - Animation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zV2yZkRFBK0&t=7s


Compatible with and complementary to other alternative fueltechnology

Truck types Drive system On-board sourceof electricity

Non-electrical sourceof energy

Combustionengine

Tractor truck(2 axles)

Tractor truck(3 axles)

Rigid truck(2 axles)



Parallel-hybrid

Serial-hybrid

Full electric

Battery (small)

Battery (medium)

Battery (large)

Fuel cell

Engine (small)

Engine (medium)

Engine (large)

Diesel

Bio-fuel

CNG/LNG

H2

The eHighway hybrid truck can be configured to suit specific applications


Pathway RangeCost per km

EfficiencyWTW

Examplevehicle

Electric Road Systems60 km

19 ct/km 77%

Battery48 km

20 ct/km 62%

Hydrogen24 km

55 ct/km 29%

Power-to-Gas17 km

70 ct/km 20%

Zero emission trucks are possible with renewable energy,but efficiency varies greatly

2 kWh/km

eTruck(Battery)

e- e-Grid

96 kWh10 ct/kWh

1,6 kWh/km

eTruck(Catenary-Hybrid)

e-Grid(incl.catenary)

96 kWh

e-

12 ct/kWh

1) Including storageSource: German Ministry of Environment

100 kWh6.0 ct/kWh

H2-network1)

CH2- fuelstation

Fuel celltruck

Electro-lysis ŋ =70%

e- H2 H2 CH2

65 kWh20 ct/kWh

65 kWh18 ct/kWh

65 kWh15 ct/kWh

93 kWh

5 kWh2 kWh

2.7 kWh/km

NG-network1)

CNG-fuelstation

Gas-truck

Electro-lysis ŋ =70%

e- H2 NG CNG

55 kWh22 ct/kWh

55 kWh20 ct/kWh

69 kWh15 ct/kWh

98 kWh

2 kWh

3.2 kWh/km

Methanationŋ = 80% CH4

55 kWh19 ct/kWh


In comparison to other solutions the eHighway proves itseconomic advantages

Fl+: PtL-liquid fuels as central GHG-free energy supply optionE+: Electrical energy as central GHG-free energy supply option (plus Hybrid Fl+)CH4+: PtG-CH4 as central GHG-free energy supply optionH2+: PtG-H2 as central GHG-free energy supply option

Source: UBA: Erarbeitung einer fachlichen Strategie zur Energieversorgung des Verkehrs bis zum Jahr 2050 (2016)* The reference scenario is the Fl+ scenario but with conventional fuels. No taxes and environmental benefits are taken into consideration.

⋅ Recently published Umweltbundesamt (UBA) reportcompares different energy scenarios and options for agreenhouse-gas-neutral transport sector in 2050

⋅ To reach greenhouse gas (GHG) neutrality in thetransport sector by 2050 scenarios four different energysupply strategies are developed and compared witheach other

⋅ For long haulage the scenario E+ assumes a wideutilization of OC-GIV (Overhead Catenary Grid-Integrated Vehicle)

The report verifies that the E+ scenario (correspondingto the eHighway) has approx. 50% less difference

cost (CAPEX + OPEX) to the next proposed scenario(FL+) in comparison with the reference scenario*.

Acc

umul

ated

cost

s(2

010

–20

50)i

nbi

llion

€(c

ompa

red

tofo

ssil

fuel

s)

Energy supply Energyinfrastructure

Vehicles Total costs

Figure 3-3: Long haul road transport


German industry association (BDI) recommends 4.000 to 8.000 kmof overhead catenary lines as a cost-effective climate action for HDVs

• BDI commissioned an independent BCG and Prognos report looking at all sectors of the economy

• Investigated the most cost effective ways to reach German climate goals: -80% and -95% GHG

• Involved 68 BDI-member associations and companies, 200 industry experts and 40 workshops

Background

Source: https://bdi.eu/publikation/news/klimapfade-fuer-deutschland/

• Building overhead catenary is the cheapest solution for HDVs, despite high infrastructure costs.

• Recommends building 4.000 km overhead contact line in the 80% scenario and 8.000 km in 95%

• Based on DE perspective. EU solution brings large synergies and is even more cost-effective

• Investment decision needs to be made by 2025, leading to first 400 km in operation by 2028.

eHighway

• Shift to rail leads to an increase by 88% of ton-km of freight activity on rail by 2050

• No additional biofuels for transport (other sectors will need biomass more and out-bid transport)

• PtX only in 95% scenario (due to high expected costs of fuel)

Transport highlights

• Reaching the 80% reduction is possible by pushing existing technologies to the max. Haseconomically positive effects, even if Germany acts alone.

• Reaching the 95% reduction goal touches the limit of what can be expected from technology andcitizens. Only in joint action with G20 economies would this be economically manageable

Major findings


Funded research projects supplement the projects onpublic roads in Los Angeles and Sweden

⋅ Los Angeles – Port Application ⋅ Sweden – Highway Application

• One mile demonstration as connectionto near-dock rail terminals for cargovehicles for 6 months

• Primary goal is to promote theimplementation of zero emissiongoods movement technologies

• Cooperation with Volvo trucks andlocal truck converter

• Two kilometer demonstration on apublic road between industrial areaand port for 2,5 years

• Overall aim is to evaluate ElectricRoad System options prior tointroduction on road network

• Cooperation with Scania trucks

Projects on Public RoadsResearch Projects

⋅ ENUBA (Germany)• First research project with BMUB• Duration: 05/2010 – 09/2011

⋅ ENUBA 2 (Germany)• Second research project with BMUB• Duration: 05/2012 – 12/2015

⋅ ELANO (Germany)• Third research project with BMUB• Duration: 01/2016 – 09/2019


Ausbauszenario am Beispiel SchwedenERS Ambitionen 2020


Field Trials in Germany are the next step for the development ofthe system

Information and routing

• Federal State of HesseProject: ELISA

• A5 Zeppelinheim-Weiterstadt

FS of Schleswig HolsteinProject: FESHA1 Reinfeld - Lübeck

• FS of Baden-WuerttembergProject: eWay-BW

• B462 Kuppenheim-Gaggenau


Thank you for your attention

Hasso Georg GrünjesHead of eHighway

Siemens AGMobilityTechnology & InnovationeHighway

Erlangen, Germany

Mobile: +49 (173) 277 838 7E-mail: [email protected]

www.siemens.com/ehighway#eHighway

ehighway range cost per km efficiency wtw example vehicle electric road systems 60 km 19 ct/km 77%...

Documents