effects of scapular upward rotation exercises on alignment ... · decrease neck pain and improve...
TRANSCRIPT
Effects of Scapular Upward Rotation
Exercises on Alignment of Scapula and
Clavicle and Strength of Scapular Upward
Rotators in Subjects With Scapular Down-
ward Rotation Syndrome
Sungmin Ha
The Graduate School
Yonsei University
Department of Physical Therapy
Effects of Scapular Upward Rotation
Exercises on Alignment of Scapula and
Clavicle and Strength of Scapular Upward
Rotators in Subjects With Scapular Down-
ward Rotation Syndrome
Sungmin Ha
The Graduate School
Yonsei University
Department of Physical Therapy
Effects of Scapular Upward Rotation
Exercises on Alignment of Scapula and
Clavicle and Strength of Scapular Upward
Rotators in Subjects With Scapular Down-
ward Rotation Syndrome
A Dissertation
Submitted to the Department of Physical Therapy
and the Graduate School of Yonsei University
in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
Sungmin Ha
June 2012
This certifies that the doctoral dissertation of Sungmin Ha is approved.
Thesis Supervisor: Ohyun Kwon
Chunghwi Yi: Thesis Committee Member #1
Heonseock Cynn: Thesis Committee Member #2
Jonghyuck Weon: Thesis Committee Member #3
Taeho Kim: Thesis Committee Member #4
The Graduate School Yonsei University
June 2012
Acknowledgements
Many people contributed to my progress in preparing this dissertation, and I am
grateful to all those who made it possible. First, I would like to express my deep
gratitude to professor Oh-yun Kwon for his help and support. As my primary mentor
and director, he perfectly guided me in the research topic, experiments, and writing of
my dissertation. Furthermore, he encouraged me not only in this work but also in my
growth as an independent thinker.
Additionally, I wish to express my deep gratitude to professor Chung-hwi Yi whose
advice, academic experience, and vast knowledge taught me a great deal. I would like
to express my gratitude to professor Heon-seock Cynn, who always demonstrated
gentle scholarly concern, giving encouragement and intelligent advice. I sincerely
appreciate professor Jong-hyuck Weon, who gave me copious advice and
encouragement, and professor Tae-ho Kim, whose prudent advice and sincere
encouragement helped to improve the quality of this dissertation. I also sincerely
thank professors Sang-hyun Cho, Hye-seon Jeon, and Seung-hyun Yoo, who helped
expand my knowledge and perspective.
I deeply appreciate all the members of KEMA, especially Jun-hyeok Jang, Do-
young Jung, Jae-sop Oh, Mun-whan Kim, and Won-whee Lee. I am grateful to my
colleagues, Su-jung Kim, Kyeu-nam Park, Sung-dae Choung, Si-hyun Kim, and In-
cheol Jeon, who have been like brothers or sisters to me, always giving me valuable
support and encouragement. Thanks to their support, I was able to earn a doctorate. I
would also like to express my deep gratitude to all members of the graduate school,
Department of Physical Therapy.
Finally, I am grateful to all my family, who always encouraged me, especially my
parents, who provided endless love and support. With their great care and affection, I
finished my graduate course and earned a doctoral degree in physical therapy. Never
satisfied with my own achievement, I will continue to work to make further progress.
Thank you.
Table of Contents
List of Figures ······································································ ii
List of Tables ······································································ iii
Abstract ············································································ iv
Introduction ········································································· 1
Method ·············································································· 6
1. Subjects ······································································ 6
2. Experimental Equipment ·················································· 8
2.1 Radiographic Analysis (X–ray) Using Simi Software ············ 8
2.2 Hand–Held Dynamometer ··········································· 11
3. Scapular Upward Rotation Exercise ···································· 14
4. Experimental Procedure ·················································· 17
5. Statistical Analysis ························································ 19
Results ·············································································· 20
1. Alignment of Scapula and CTA ········································· 20
2. Strength of Scapular Upward Rotators ································· 23
Discussion ········································································· 25
Conclusion ········································································· 30
References ········································································· 31
Abstract in Korean ································································ 38
-i-
List of Figures
Figure 1. Radiographic analysis using SIMI motion analysis program ···· 10
Figure 2. Measurement of scapular upward rotator strength ················· 13
Figure 3. Scapular upward rotation exercise ··································· 16
Figure 4. Scapular and clavicular alignment between pre–and post–program
············································································· 22
-ii-
List of Tables
Table 1. General characteristics of the subjects ··································· 7
Table 2. Differences in scapular and clavicular alignment between pre– and
post–program ····························································· 21
Table 3. Strength of scapular upward rotators ·································· 24
-iii-
ABSTRACT
Effects of Scapular Upward Rotation Exercises on
Alignment of Scapula and Clavicle and Strength of
Scapular Upward Rotators in Subjects With
Scapular Downward Rotation Syndrome
Sungmin Ha Dept. of Physical Therapy
The Graduate School
Yonsei University
Scapular downward rotation syndrome (SDRS) is common scapular and clavicular
alignment impairment in individuals with shoulder pain. Changes in the alignment of
the scapula and clavicle can potentially influence the biomechanics of the shoulder
region. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a 6–week scapular
upward rotation exercise (SURE) on scapular and clavicular alignment and scapular
upward rotators strength in subjects with SDRS. Twenty–one volunteer subjects with
SDRS (10 males and 11 females) were recruited from university populations. Thirteen
-iv-
subjects had bilateral SDRS, and eight subjects had one–sided SDRS (a total of 34
sides). The alignment of the scapula and clavicle was measured using radiographic
analysis (X–ray) and compared in subjects before and after a 6–week self–SURE
program. A hand–held dynamometer was used to measure the strength of the scapular
upward rotators (serratus anterior, and upper trapezius muscles). The subjects were
instructed how to perform the self–SURE program at home. The 6–week self–SURE
program was divided into two sections (the first section with non-resistive SURE
during weeks 1–3, and the second section with resistive SURE using thera–band
during weeks 4–6). The significance of the difference between pre– and post–program
was assessed using a paired t–test, with the level of statistical significance set at p <
0.05. Significant differences between pre– and post–program were found for scapular
and clavicular alignment (p < 0.05). Additionally, the comparison between pre– and
post–program measurements of the strength of the scapular upward rotators (serratus
anterior, and upper trapezius muscle) showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The
results of this study showed that a 6–week self–SURE program is effective for
improving scapular and clavicular alignment and increasing the strength of scapular
upward rotator muscles in subjects with SDRS.
Key Words: Scapular and clavicular alignment, Scapular downward rotation
syndrome, Scapular upward rotator exercise.
-v-
Introduction
Assessment of postural alignment is considered an important part of the physical
examination because impairment in alignment may contribute to excessive stress and
compression on joints, muscles, and ligaments, resulting in pain (Kendall et al. 2005;
Kibler 1998; Magee 1997; Sahrmann, 2002; Tuzun et al. 1999). Previous studies have
found a positive relationship between alignment and pathology (Swift, and Nichols
1984; Braun, 1991; Szeto, Straker, and Raine 2002). The position of the scapula is a
key contributor to normal shoulder motion and control (DiVeta, Walker, and Skibinski
1990).
Ideal scapular alignment is described as the vertebral border parallel to the spine and
positioned 3 inches from the midline of the thorax (Sobush et al. 1996). The scapula
should be positioned between the spinous process of the second and seventh thoracic
vertebrae and rotated 30° anterior to the frontal plane (Hoppenfeld 1976; Kendall et al.
2005; Magee 1997; Sahrmann 2002). Impairment in alignment of the scapula can be
classified as scapular downward rotation (SDR), depressed, elevated, adducted,
abducted, tilted, or winged (Kendall et al. 2005). When the inferior border of the
scapula is more medial than the superior border, the scapula is considered to be in
SDR; the shoulder is lower and slopes downward at the acromial end (VanDillen
2007). Scapular downward rotation syndrome (SDRS) is one of the most common
scapular and clavicular alignment impairments in individuals with shoulder pain
(Sahrmann 2002).
- 1 -
Impairments in alignment are believed to be correlated with specific movement–
related diagnoses, and they provide clues about the resting length of muscles
(Caldwell, Sahrmann, and Van Dillen 2007). Changes in alignment of the scapula and
clavicle can potentially influence the biomechanics of the shoulder region by altering
tension at the cervicoscapular muscle (increased upper trapezius muscle length, and
levator scapula stiffness), which may lead to insufficient scapular upward rotation,
instability of the glenohumeral joint, thoracic outlet syndrome during arm elevation,
and prolonged compressive loading of the cervical spine (Caldwell, Sahrmann, and
Van Dillen 2007; Griegel-Morris et al. 1992; Sahrmann 2002; Szeto, Straker, and
Raine 2002; William et al. 2010). The clavicle is the sole bony structure connecting
the trunk to the shoulder girdle via the sternoclavicular joint medially and the
acromioclavicular joint laterally (Ljunggren 1979). The bone is strongly connected to
a number of muscles (deltoid, trapezius, and subclavius muscles) and to the fascicles
of the neck and pectoral region, which is functionally joined by the internal and
external jugular veins and the subclavian vein (Craig 1998). Because of its anatomical
position, the clavicle has many functions in the human body. The clavicle holds the
scapula in position allowing it to hang freely and obtain the maximum range of
movement (Inman, and Saunders 1945). The lateral part of the clavicle serves as an
attachment point for muscles and ligaments, and the medial part accepts axial loading
and transmits physical impact and force to other parts of the body to reduce trauma
and damage during upper–extremity movement (Lin, and Yang 2006). Furthermore,
the clavicle protects important neurovascular structures in the region (Craig 1998). An
- 2 -
alteration in clavicular tilt angle (CTA) (angle between horizontal line and the long
axis of the clavicle) may indicate a change in muscle length and joint alignment that
must be corrected to allow optimal motion (Sahrmann 2002). A change in CTA
associated with abnormal scapular alignment may affect the muscle length of the
deltoid, upper trapezius, and subclavius muscles, causing a biomechanical alteration
and possibly shoulder joint pain (Kendall et al. 2005; Novak, and Mackinnon 1997).
CTA can be used as an indicator to determine the presence of depressed scapula,
downward rotated scapula, and elevated scapula.
Sahrmann (2002) reported that patients with SDRS have relative muscle flexibility
impairment. Shortness of muscles (rhomboid, pectoralis minor, latissimus dorsi,
deltoid, and supraspinatus) by altered alignment can restrict shoulder motion.
Consistent with the length–tension relationship, lengthened serratus anterior, upper
trapezius, and lower trapezius muscles cannot generate sufficient tension to assist in
upward rotation of the scapula (Thibodeau, and Patton 2003). Furthermore, changes
in muscle–recruitment patterns in the neck–shoulder region lead to limitations in
functional range of movement and produce compensatory movement (Sahrmann
2002). During shoulder flexion and abduction in subjects with SDRS, the rhomboid,
levator scapula, and deltoid muscle are dominant over the activity of the serratus
anterior and upper trapezius muscles, which are the primary upward rotators of the
scapula. These muscles do not rotate the scapula the desired 60° and leads to
excessive glenohumeral motion during full shoulder flexion and/or abduction. A
change in the direction of the glenoid fossa in patients with SDRS can increase
- 3 -
downward–pulling tension as well as downward subluxation of the glenohumeral
joint (Basmajian, and Bazant 1959). Additionally, a prolonged SDR position may
increase downward–pulling tension by changing the stiffness of the scapulohumeral
muscles (subscapularis, infraspinatus, teres major, teres minor, and latissimus dorsi)
(Sahrmann 2002).
Previous studies have investigated the effects of modifying scapular alignment. Ha
et al. (2011) suggested that the passive correction of the scapular position could
decrease neck pain and improve neck range of motion (ROM) and proprioception
during active neck rotation in patients with bilateral SDR. Azevedo et al. (2008)
reported that passively elevating the scapula in subjects with scapular depression was
an effective strategy to decrease trapezius discomfort, neck pain, and cervicogenic
headache. Additionally, subjects with scapular position impairments had a
significantly lower pressure–pain threshold in the upper trapezius muscle region
compared with healthy young subjects with the scapula in a neutral position. Andrade
et al. (2008) suggested that supporting the upper limb leads to significant
improvement in cervical rotation ROM between subjects with neutral vertical
scapular alignment and those with depressed scapular alignment. Elevating and
adducting the patient’s scapula and supporting the weight of the limbs resulted in
increased cervical motion and a decrease in cervicogenic headache (McDonell,
Sahrmann, and Van Dillen 2005). Although these passive interventions have shown
immediate effects related to reducing neck–shoulder complaints and dysfunction,
there is a lack of long–term or carry–over effects. To gain the long–term or carry–over
- 4 -
effects, it is suggested that exercise intervention is necessary to restore optimal
muscle strength and length for normal functional upper–extremity motion (Ludewig,
and Borstad 2003). Stretching and strengthening exercise programs are often used in
the conservative treatment of shoulder pain in an attempt to reduce symptoms and
alter abnormal motion and muscle activities (Bang, and Deyle 2000; Wang et al.
1999). Scapular upward rotation exercise (SURE), which improves the strength of the
scapular upward rotators (serratus anterior, and upper trapezius muscles) and stretches
the scapular downward rotator (levator scapulae), is necessary to restore optimal
muscle length and strength in patients with SDRS (Sahrmann 2002). Studies
examining persons with abnormal scapular alignment have suggested that impairment
in scapular alignment results in functional limitations and painful symptoms. Several
studies have employed a self–reported questionnaire (pain, and disability) and
measurement of cervical ROM and muscle strength before and after therapeutic
intervention; however, the effects of intervention on scapular and clavicular alignment
have not been examined (Andrade et al. 2008; Azevedo et al. 2008; Ha et al. 2011;
McDonell, Sahrmann, and Van Dillen 2005). Therefore, this study was conducted to
investigate the effects of a 6–week self–SURE program on scapular and clavicular
alignment and scapular upward rotator strength in subjects with SDRS. It was
hypothesized that pre– and post–program measures would reveal differences in the
alignment of the scapula and clavicle and the strength of the scapular upward rotators.
- 5 -
Method
1. Subjects
Twenty–one volunteer subjects with SDRS (10 males and 11 females) were recruited
from university populations. Thirteen subjects had bilateral SDRS, and eight subjects
had one–sided SDRS (a total of 34 sides). The inclusion criteria for subject selection
in this study based on the literature (Caldwell, Sahrmann, and Van Dillen 2007; Ha et
al. 2011; Sahrmann 2002) included (1) the scapula was downwardly rotated by visual
appraisal; (2) the clavicle appeared to be horizontal or the acromioclavicular joint was
lower than the sternoclavicular joint by visual appraisal; and (3) the vertebral borders
of the scapula were less than 3 inches from the spine by tape measure. Subjects with
cervical spinal fractures, neck-rotation ROM of <20º, radiating pain to an upper
extremity, or a history of unresolved cancer were excluded. Prior to the study, the
principal investigator explained all procedures to the subjects, and all subjects signed
an informed consent form, which was approved by the Yonsei University Wonju
Campus Human Studies Committee. The subject’s general characteristics are
presented in Table 1.
- 6 -
Table 1. General characteristics of the subjects (N=21)
.
Mean ± SD Range
Age (yr) 24.3 ± 2.6 21–32
Height (㎝) 166.8 ± 7.0 153–180
Weight (㎏) 60.4 ± 10.5 45–82
- 7 -
2. Experimental Equipment
2.1 Radiographic Analysis (X–ray) Using SIMI Software
All radiographs were taken by the same X–ray technician using a radiography
apparatus in postero-anterior projection (Diagnostic X–ray, Dong-A Co., Ltd., Japan).
The subject was asked to stand in front of the grid, and the X–ray technician placed
the grid on the subject`s chest. A 5–㎝–long horizontal steel rod attached to the
cervicothorasic junction was used as a reference point to calibrate using the SIMI
Motion Analysis System (SIMI Motion 5.0 Reality Motion Systems,
Unterschleissheim, Germany) in the frontal plane (Figure 1A). The scapular
alignment and clavicular tilt angle were measured from radiographic findings of chest
X–ray (Akel et al. 2008; Sobush et al. 1996). All acquired images were converted to
digital images using a conversion program and analyzed using SIMI software. The
scapular alignment was measured by drawing a vertical axis line connecting two
points in the centerline of the body of the sternum. The perpendicular distance from
the vertical axis line was calculated at the superior border, the midpoint of the
vertebral border, and the inferior border of the scapula (Figure 1A) (distance between
inferior border and corresponding spine: DIS, distance between medial border and
corresponding spine: DMS, distance between superior border and corresponding
spine: DSS) (Caldwell, Sahrmann, and Van Dillen 2007; Sobush et al. 1996). Using
an image of radiographic finding, the CTA was measured at the axis of lines drawn
through the centerline of the body of the sternum and centerline of the long axis of the
- 8 -
- 9 -
clavicles at both end (Figure 1B). The clavicular tilt angle was calculated as follows:
clavicular tilt angle = (angle between vertical axis line and the long axis of the
clavicle) – 90° (Akel et al. 2008).
Figure 1. Radiographic analysis using SIMI motion analysis program. (A) Scapular alignment, (B) Clavicular alignment. DSS: Distance between superior border and corresponding spine. DMS: Distance between medial border and corresponding spine. DIS: Distance between inferior border and corresponding spine.
- 10 -
2.2. Hand–Held Dynamometer
A hand-held dynamometer (HHD) (Lafayette Manual Muscle Test System Model
01163, Lafayette Instrument Co., NL, USA) was used to measure the strength of the
serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscle (Figure 2A). The HHD was calibrated
before testing by calculating the difference between a known load applied to a digital
weight scale and the known load applied to the HHD. The absolute difference
between the digital weight scale and the HHD for the known load of 1, 2, 3, and 5 ㎏
were calculated. The resultant error was less than 0.1 ㎏.
The serratus anterior muscle strength test was performed as described by Kendall et
al. (2005) in supine position. The original test described the resistance applied against
the subject’s closed fist. In the present study, the elbow was placed at 90º of flexion,
and resistance was applied to the ulna at the olecranon process along the long axis of
the humerus. This application of resistance was modified for the serratus anterior
muscle test because the HHD could not be applied in a stable or consistent manner
over the subject’s hand (Michener et al. 2005), as depicted in the original description
of the test by Kendall et al. (2005). Moreover, this modification decreased the number
of joints that had to be crossed as force was applied to the scapulothoracic joint. The
triceps muscle was monitored visually and by palpation to ensure that it did not
contribute to the force produced during the serratus anterior muscle test. The scapular
motion for this test was scapular protraction (Figure 2B).
The upper trapezius muscle strength test was performed as described by Hislop, and
Montgomery (1995). The HHD was placed over the superior scapula, and force was
- 11 -
applied directly downward (inferior) through the HHD in the direction of scapular
depression. Scapular elevation was the scapular motion for the upper trapezius muscle
test (Figure 2C).
All subjects performed the muscle strength tests in the same order, i.e., serratus
anterior followed by and upper trapezius muscle test. The examiner viewed the digital
readout on the HHD during each performance of the muscle strength test and recorded
muscle strength in kilogram on a data–recording sheet. Each muscle strength test was
performed three times consecutively, and the average was used for data analysis.
- 12 -
Figure 2. Measurement of scapular upward rotator strength. (A) Hand–held dynamometer, (B)Serratus anterior muscle strength test, (C) Upper trapezius strength test
- 13 -
3. Scapular Upward Rotation Exercise
SURE instruction was provided to the subjects by asking them to stand with their
back against the wall, with wall contact from head to buttock, and feet shoulder–width
apart. In the starting position, the radial border of the forearms and lateral side of the
humerus were in contact with the wall, and the shoulder was abducted 90º with the
elbow flexed 90º. The subjects were instructed to slide their arms up the wall. The
sliding movement ended when the shoulder reached 180º of abduction. The subject
was then instructed to maintain the arm position for 10 seconds (Figure 3). The
subjects were instructed that the exercises may induce muscle fatigue but should not
cause increased shoulder pain. Subjects were instructed to perform SURE 3 days per
week.
The 6–week self–SURE program was divided into two sections (the first section with
non–resistive SURE during weeks 1–3 and the second section with resistive SURE
using a thera–band during weeks 4–6 (Figure 3). During the 6–week self–SURE
program, subjects were asked to perform three sets of 10 repetitions during the first
week, progress to three sets of 15 repetitions during each session in the second week,
and complete three sets of 20 repetitions during the third week. After completing three
sets of 20 repetitions for three consecutive sessions, subjects were evaluated whether
they were pain–free and had achieved full active range of motion. All subjects who
were pain–free in full active range of motion were prescribed self–SURE.
After the first section of the 6–week self–SURE program, subjects were allowed to
- 14 -
progress to the second section of the 6–week self–SURE program at the fourth week.
The low level of tension of the thera–band was controlled by a concentric exercise
phase that did not cause excessive loading for activated muscles and joint pain. The
level of thera–band tension was increased by shortening the thera–band as tolerated
without discomfort or pain while maintaining the exercise performance instructed by
the physical therapist. If subjects felt or complained of pain during the resistive SURE
using thera–band, they were asked to lengthen the thera–band. The subjects were
asked to perform resistive SURE using thera–band for three sets of 10 repetitions
during each session in the fourth week, progress to three sets of 15 repetitions in the
fifth week, and complete three sets of 20 repetitions in the sixth week.
- 15 -
Figure 3. Scapular upward rotation exercise.
- 16 -
4. Experimental Procedure
All subjects were evaluated for study inclusion/exclusion at the initial visit. The
position of each subject’s shoulder girdle was assessed by radiography and analyzed
by SIMI software. The strength of the scapular upward rotators (serratus anterior, and
upper trapezius muscles) was measured three times using a hand–held dynamometer.
All measurements were performed both at the time of entry into the study (pre–
program) and at follow–up (post–program).
Following the initial measurement, the subjects received instruction in a 6–week
self–SURE program by a licensed physical therapist with 9 years of clinical
experience in evaluation and treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. Each subjects
received written/pictorial instructions and a video file for home reference during the
SURE program and a daily exercise log to monitor compliance with the exercise
program. All subjects received a 1–hour training session at the initial visit. The
subjects were asked to perform a 6–week self–SURE program. The subjects returned
1 week after the initial session for review of the home self–SURE program, and
questions regarding the exercise regime were answered by the physical therapist. At 4
weeks, the therapist checked whether subjects clearly understood the self–SURE
program or were having any difficulty performing the exercise regime. Every week,
the subjects were contacted by telephone to monitor compliance, discuss any
problems, and ensure proper progression of self–SURE program at home. At the post–
- 17 -
program visit, subjects rated their exercise compliance during the 6–week self–SURE
program using a numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 100%.
- 18 -
5. Statistical Analysis
The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviations. The paired t–test was
used to test for significant differences between pre– and post–program measurements.
The effect size, cohen`s “d,” was calculated to determine the standardized mean
difference between pre– and post–program values. The level of statistical significance
was set at p < 0.05. The statistical package for the Social Sciences for Windows
version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis.
- 19 -
Results
1. Alignment of Scapula and CTA
The comparison of pre– and post–program values showed significant differences for
DSS, DMS, DIS, and CTA (p < 0.05) (Table 2) (Figure 4). The calculated effect sizes
for DSS, DMS, DIS, and CTA between pre– and post–program are shown Table 2.
- 20 -
Table 2. Differences in scapular and clavicular alignment between pre– and post–
program (N=34 sides)
aDSS: Distance between superior border and corresponding spine.
Pre–program Post–program t p Effect size
DSSa (㎝) 7.27 ± 0.91e 6.57 ± 0.88 7.50 0.000 0.36
DMSb (㎝) 6.35 ± 1.04 6.53 ± 1.05 -5.68 0.000 0.09
DISc (㎝) 6.30 ± 1.01 6.65 ± 0.92 -3.34 0.002 0.17
CTAd (°) 1.99 ± 3.09 9.50 ± 4.08 -9.77 0.000 0.72
bDMS: Distance between medial border and corresponding spine. cDIS: Distance between inferior border and corresponding spine. dCTA: Clavicular tilt angle. eMean ± standard deviation.
- 21 -
Figure 4. Scapular and clavicular alignment between pre– and post–program.
- 22 -
2. Strength of Scapular Upward Rotators
A paired t–test revealed significant differences between the pre– and post–program
measures, indicating that the 6–week self–SURE program increased the muscle
strength of the serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscles (p < 0.05) (Table 3). The
calculated effect size between pre– and post–program of the serratus anterior and that
of the upper trapezius muscles is shown Table 3.
- 23 -
Table 3. Strength of scapular upward rotators (N=34 sides)
aSA: Serratus anterior.
Pre-program Post-program t p Effect
size
SAa (㎏) 22.68 ± 4.49 36.00 ± 10.32 - 8.46 0.000 0.64
UTb(㎏) 25.29 ± 6.95 41.07 ± 9.45 - 10.16 0.000 0.75
bUT: Upper trapezius.
- 24 -
Discussion
The purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of a 6–week self–SURE
program on scapular and clavicular alignment and scapular upward rotator strength in
subjects with SDRS. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effect
of a 6–week self–SURE program on the changes in alignment of the scapula and
clavicle and strength of the scapular upward rotators (serratus anterior, and upper
trapezius muscles) in subject with SDRS. The results of the present study support the
hypothesis that a 6–week self–SURE program can improve the alignment of the
scapula and clavicle (DSS, DMS, DIS, and CTA) and the strength of the scapular
upward rotators (serratus anterior, and upper trapezius muscle).
For scapular alignment, DIS was increased significantly after the 6–week self–
SURE program (p < 0.05). Shoulder girdle alignments are an indicator of possible
muscle length changes and joint alignments that need to be corrected to allow for
optimal shoulder girdle motion (Sahrmann 2002). Bunch and Siegel (1993) described
a standard position for scapular alignment, which specifies that the vertebral border of
the scapula be parallel to the spine and positioned approximately 3 inches
(approximately 7–8 ㎝) from the midline of the thorax. Before the program, DIS was
less than DSS, which reflects the SDR position. Furthermore, DMS was less than 3
inches. After the 6–week self–SURE program, and significant decreased in DSS was
observed at post-program compared with pre–program (p < 0.05). DMS and DIS
increased significantly in the post–program compared with pre–program (p < 0.05).
- 25 -
After the 6–week self–SURE program, DIS was closer to DSS, indicating a scapular
position more parallel to the spine compared with pre–program. DMS was closer to
the target value of approximately 3 inches. Based on these findings, the scapular
alignment was close to a normal position, as described Kendall (2005). Thus, the 6–
week self–SURE program can assist in restoring normal alignment of the scapula and
possibly in restoring the normal length of scapular upward rotators.
Previous studies using plain-film radiography incorporated CTA measurements to
investigate shoulder muscle imbalance in individuals with scoliosis (Akel et al. 2008;
Kuklo et al. 2002; Uzümcügil et al. 2011). Ludewig et al. (2009) reported that the
clavicular tilt angle was 5.9° in neutral standing by electromagnetic motion analysis.
McClure et al. (2004) reported that the clavicular tilt angle was about 4°, which was
derived from the electromagnetic sensor at the sternal notch and acromioclavicular
joint. Although CTA has been measured using an electromagnetic motion analysis
system in previous reports (Ludewig et al. 2009; McClure et al. 2004), few studies
have reported normative data for CTA measurement, which is available and accessible
for musculoskeletal evaluation and diagnosis (Sahrmann 2002). Additionally,
increased CTA can reduce prolonged compressive loading of the posterior cervical
structures as a result of the transfer of the weight of the extremities to the cervical
region through the attachments of the cervicoscapular muscle (upper trapezius and
levator scapulae) (Van Dillen et al. 2007). For these reasons, CTA assessment is
important for upper-extremity evaluation. In the present study, CTA was significantly
increased after compared with before program (p < 0.05). These results suggest that
- 26 -
the 6–week self–SURE program was useful for restoring optimal alignment of the
clavicle in subjects with SDRS.
Significant differences in scapular upward rotator strength (serratus anterior, and
upper trapezius muscle) between pre– and post–program were also found (p < 0.05).
The serratus anterior and upper trapezius muscles are critical for maintaining optimal
scapular position, and they control the scapular upward rotation, which was targeted
in this study (Neumann 2002) In a previous study, a 6–week strengthening exercise
for the correction of SDR demonstrated that the serratus anterior and upper trapezius
increased in strength grade, as defined by Kendall, in patients with SDRS (McDonell,
Sahrmann, and Van Dillen 2005). Through the 6–week self–SURE program, we
hypothesized that increased muscle strength of the serratus anterior and upper
trapezius muscle could change the resting muscle length. It has been suggested that a
6–week self–SURE program might have decreased muscle length by reducing the
sarcomere number (Herring, Grimm, and Grimm 1984). The change in resting muscle
length associated with body posture may influence body alignment (Goldspink, and
Williams, 1990; Hrysomallis, and Goodman 2001). In the present study, increased
strength of the scapular upward rotators led to alignment changes in the scapula and
clavicle (DSS, DMS, DIS, and CAT). Although we did not directly measure the
change in muscle length, the 6–week self–SURE program was designed to stretch the
scapular downward rotator (levator scapulae) as well as strengthen the scapular
upward rotators (serratus anterior, and upper trapezius muscles). An effective exercise
for correcting anatomic length adaptation is to contract the lengthened muscle into a
- 27 -
shortened position and simultaneously stretch the shortened muscle (Sahrmann 2002).
Therefore, restoring the muscle length of the scapular upward rotators and downward
rotators through SURE is important for changing scapular and clavicular alignment in
subjects with SDRS. The findings of the present study suggest that the 6–week self–
SURE program in subjects with SDRS may be an effective exercise program,
supporting the findings of Sahrmann (2002) and Caldwell, Sahrmann, and Van Dillen
(2007) who investigated the effectiveness of SURE on scapular alignment.
We designed the 6–week self–SURE program to be simple and to require relatively
few visits. The 6–week self–SURE program was essentially a home–based program
with weekly coaching and minor modifications rather than one requiring extensive
manual techniques from a physical therapist. Subjects reported 73% exercise
compliance in the 6–week self–SURE program. The data in the present study agree
with those of other reports using a home–based program in showing improved
function and reduced impairments in patients with SDRS (McDonell, Sahrmann, and
Van Dillen 2005). Therefore, the 6–week self–SURE program can be recommended
for correcting SDRS.
The present study has several limitations. First, generalization of the study is limited
because our subjects were young and had no pain. Additionally, no control program
was incorporated in the study. Thus, further research is needed to examine the effect
of SURE program in subjects in different age groups and individuals with neck–
shoulder pain. Second, the measurement of scapular and clavicular alignment was
conducted only in the static standing position. Further study is needed to investigate
- 28 -
scapular and clavicular motion during dynamic upper–extremity motions after
performing the 6–week self–SURE program.
- 29 -
Conclusion
The effects of the 6–week self–SURE program on scapular and clavicular alignment
and scapular upward rotator strength were investigated in subjects with SDRS. The
findings of the present study showed significant differences in alignment of the
scapula and clavicle and the strength of scapular upward rotators between pre– and
post–program. The findings of the present study provide evidence for the
effectiveness of SURE in subjects with SDRS.
- 30 -
References
Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M, Genc Y, Kocak O, Derman O, Erdogan I, and Yazici
M. Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its cor-
relation with radiological parameters. Euro Spine J. 2008;17(3):348-354.
Andrade GT, Azevedo DC, De Assis Lorentz I, Galo Neto RS, Sadala Do Pinho V,
Ferraz Gonçalves RT, Mcdonnell MK, and Van Dillen LR. Influence of scapular
position on cervical rotation range of motion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.
2008;38(11):668-673.
Azevedo DC, de Lima Pires T, de Souza Andrade F, and McDonnell MK. Influence of
scapular position on the pressure pain threshold of the upper trapezius muscle re-
gion. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(2):226-232.
Bang MD, and Deyle GD. Comparison of supervised exercise with and without man-
ual physical therapy for patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Orthop
Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(3):126-137.
Basmajian JV, and Bazant FJ. Factors preventing downward dislocation of the ad-
ducted shoulder joint. An electromyographic and morphological study. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 1959;41:1182-1186.
- 31 -
Braun BL. Postural differences between asymptomatic men and women and craniofa-
cial pain patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72(9):653-656.
Bunch WH, and Siegel IM. Scapulothoracic arthrodesis in facioscapulohumeral mus-
cular dystrophy. Review of seventeen procedures with three to twenty-one-year fol-
low-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(3):372-376.
Caldwell C, Sahrmann S, and Van Dillen L. Use of a movement system impairment
diagnosis for physical therapy in the management of a patient with shoulder pain. J
Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(9):551-563.
Craig EV. Fractures of the clavicle. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Matsen FA III, eds. The
Shoulder. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1998.
DiVeta J, Walker ML, and Skibinski B. Relationship between performance of selected
scapular muscles and scapular abduction in standing subjects. Phys Ther.
1990;70(8):470-476.
Goldspink G, and Williams PE. Muscle fibre and connective tissue changes associat-
ed with use and disuse. In: Ada L, Canning C, editors. Foundations for practice.
Topics in neurological physiotherapy. London: Heinemann, 1990.
- 32 -
Griegel-Morris P, Larson K, Muller-Klaus K, and Oatis CA. Incidence of common
postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their as-
sociation with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects. Phys Ther.
1992;72(6):425-431.
Ha SM, Kwon OY, Yi CH, Jeon HS, and Lee WH. Effects of passive correction of
scapular position on pain, proprioception, and range of motion in neck-pain pa-
tients with bilateral scapular downward-rotation syndrome. Man Ther. 2011
16(6):585-589.
Herring SW, Grimm AF, and Grimm BR. Regulation of sarcomere number in skeletal
muscle: a comparison of hypotheses. Muscle Nerve. 1984;7(2):161-173.
Hislop HJ, and Montgomery J. Muscle testing techniques of manual examination.
Philadelphia: WB Saunders company, 1995.
Hoppenfeld S. Physical examination of the spine and extremities. East Norwalk:
Appletone Centurye Crofts, 1976.
Hrysomallis C, and Goodman C. A review of resistance exercise and posture realign-
ment. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(3):385-390.
- 33 -
Inman VT, and Saunders JB. Observations on the function of the clavicle. Calif Med.
1945;65(4):158-166.
Kibler WB. The role of the scapula in athletic shoulder function. Am J Sports Med.
1998;26(2):325-337.
Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, Rodgers MM, and Romani WA. Muscles:
testing and function with posture and pain. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ, Won DS, Sweet FA, Blanke KM, and Bridwell KH.
Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance
following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idi-
opathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27(18):2013-2020.
Lin JJ, and Yang JL. Reliability and validity of shoulder tightness measurement in
patients with stiff shoulders. Man Ther. 2006;11(2):146-152.
Ljunggren AE. Clavicular function. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979;50:261-268.
Ludewig PM, and Borstad JD. Effects of a home exercise program on shoulder pain
and functional status in construction workers. Occup Environ Med.
2003;60(11):841-849.
- 34 -
Ludewig, PM, Phadke, V, Braman, JP, Hassett, DR, Cieminski, CJ, and Laprade, RF.
Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation. J Bone Joint
Surg Am. 2009;91(2):378-389.
Magee DJ. Orthopedic physical assessment. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company,
1997.
McDonell MK, Sahrmann SA, and Van Dillen L. A specific exercise program and
modification of postural alignment for treatment of cervicogenic headache: A case
report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;30(1):3-15.
McClure PW, Bialker J, Neff N, Williams G, and Karduna A. Shoulder function and
3-dimensional kinematics in people with shoulder impingement syndrome before
and after a 6-week exercise program. Phy Ther. 2004;84(9):832-848.
Michener LA, Boardman BD, Pidcoe PE, and Frith AM. Scapular muscle tests in sub-
jects with shoulder pain and functional loss: Reliability and construct validity. Phy
Ther. 2005;85(11):1128-1138.
Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Physical
Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2002
- 35 -
Novak CB, and Mackinnon SE. Repetitive use and static postures: a source of nerve
compression and pain. J Hand Ther. 1997;10(2):151–159.
Sahrmann S. Diagnosis and treatment of movement impairment syndromes. St. Louis:
Mosby, 2002.
Sobush DC, Simoneau GG, Dietz KE, Levene JA, Grossman RE, and Smith WB. The
lennie test for measuring scapular position in healthy young adult females: a relia-
bility and validity study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1996;23(1):39-50.
Swift TR, and Nichols FT. The droopy shoulder syndrome. Neurology.
1984;34(2):212-215.
Szeto GP, Straker L, and Raine S. A field comparison of neck and shoulder postures
in symptomatic and asymptomatic office workers. Appl Ergon. 2002;33(1):75-84.
Thibodeau GA, and PattonKT. Anatomy and physiology. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby,
2003.
Tuzun C, Yorumaz I, Cindas A, and Vantan S. Low back pain and posture. Clin
Rheumatol. 1999;18(4):308-312.
- 36 -
Uzümcügil O, Atici Y, Ozturkmen Y, Yalcinkaya M, and Caniklioglu M. Evaluation of
Shoulder Balance Through Growing Rod Intervention for Early-onset Scoliosis. J
Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;16. [in press]
Van Dillen LR, McDonell MK, Susco TM, and Sahrmann SA. The immediate effect
of passive scapular elevation on symptoms with active neck rotation in patients
with neck pain. Clin J Pain. 2007;23(8):641-647.
Wang CH, McClure P, Pratt NE, and Nobilini R. Stretching and
strengtheningexercises: their effect on three-dimensional scapular kinematics. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(8):923-929.
William JH, Morey JK, Judi SD, Rodney N, and Patrick P. The influence of education
and exercise on neck pain. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2010;4(2):166-175.
- 37 -
국문 요약
어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군을 가진 대상자에게 어깨뼈
위돌림 운동이 어깨뼈와 빗장뼈의 정렬 및 어깨뼈
위돌림근의 근력에 미치는 영향
연세대학교 대학원
물리치료학과
하 성 민
어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군은 어깨 통증을 가진 사람들에게 가장 흔하게
나타나는 어깨뼈와 빗장뼈 정렬 손상이다. 어깨뼈와 빗장뼈의 정렬 변화는
잠재적으로 어깨부위의 생체역학적 변화를 일으킬 수 있다. 본 연구의
목적은 어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군을 가진 대상자에게 6 주간의 어깨뼈
위돌림 운동이 어깨뼈 및 빗장뼈의 정렬 그리고 어깨뼈 위돌림근의 근력에
미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다.
- 38 -
21 명의 (남자 10 명과 여자 11 명) 어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군을 가진
대상자들이 연구에 참여했으며, 13 명은 양측에 어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군을
가지고 있으며 8 명은 한 쪽 어깨에만 어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군을 가지고
있었다. 어깨뼈와 빗장뼈의 정렬은 6 주간의 자가 어깨뼈 위돌림 운동
전후에 방사선 촬영기기를 이용하여 측정하였다. 어깨뼈 위돌림근의
(앞톱니근 및 위 등세모근) 근력을 측정하기 위해서 도수용 근력 측정기를
이용하였다. 실험대상자들은 6 주간의 자가 어깨뼈 위돌림 운동을
시행하였다. 운동 전후간에 어깨뼈와 빗장뼈의 정렬, 그리고 어깨뼈
위돌림근들의 근력에 어떠한 차이가 있는지 알아보기 위해 짝비교 t-
검정을 실시하였으며, 유의수준은 0.05 로 하였다.
어깨뼈와 빗장뼈의 정렬이 유의하게 호전되었다. 위돌림근들 (앞톱니근
및 위 등세모근)의 근력이 유의하게 증가하였다. 본 연구의 결과로 볼 때,
6 주간의 자가 어깨뼈 위돌림 운동이 어깨뼈 및 빗장뼈의 정렬과 어깨뼈
위돌림근의 근력 개선에 효과적인 운동방법이라고 사료된다.
핵심되는 말: 어깨뼈와 빗장뼈의 정렬, 어깨뼈 아래돌림 증후군, 어깨뼈
위돌림 운동.
- 39 -