effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting...
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
1/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
Complementary Therapies in Medicine (2015) xxx, xxx—xxx
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
journa l homepage: www.elsevierheal th.com/ journals/ct im
Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy onchemotherapy-induced nausea andvomiting and health-related quality of lifein women with breast cancer
Pei Lin Luaa,∗
, Noor Salihahb
, Nik Mazlanc
a Community Health Research Cluster, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA),
Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysiab Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA) , Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala
Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysiac Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan Campus,
25710 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
Received 18 September 2014; received in revised form 31 December 2014; accepted 27 March 2015
KEYWORDSAromatherapy;
Chemotherapy-
induced nausea
vomiting;
Ginger;
Zingiber officinale;
Essential oil
Summary
Objective: To assess the efficacy of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on nausea, vomiting and
health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in chemotherapy breast cancer patients.
Design: Single-blind, controlled, randomized cross-over study. Patients received 5-day aro-
matherapy treatment using either ginger essential oil or fragrance-matched artificial placebo
(ginger fragrance oil) which was instilled in a necklace in an order dictated by the treatment
group sequence.
Setting: Two oncology clinics in the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia.
Main outcome measures: VAS nausea score, frequency of vomiting and HRQoL profile (EORTC
QLQ-C30 scores).
Results: Sixty female patients completed the study (age = 47.3± 9.26 years; Malay = 98.3%; on
highly emetogenic chemotherapy = 86.7%). The VAS nausea score was significantly lower after
ginger essential oil inhalation compared to placebo during acute phase (P = 0.040) but not sus-tained for overall treatment effect (treatment effect: F = 1.82, P = 0.183; time effect: F = 43.98,
P < 0.001; treatment× time effect: F = 2.04; P = 0.102). Similarly, there was no significant effect
of aromatherapy on vomiting [F (1, 58) = 0.29, P = 0.594]. However, a statistically significant
change from baseline for global health status (P < 0.001) was detected after ginger essential
oil inhalation. A clinically relevant 10 points improvement on role functioning (P = 0.002) and
appetite loss (P < 0.001) were also documented while patients were on ginger essential oil.
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 9 6688520; fax: +60 9 6687896; mobile: +60 17 6228430.
E-mail addresses:[email protected], [email protected] (P.L. Lua).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
0965-2299/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09652299http://www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/ctimmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/ctimhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09652299http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
2/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
2 P.L. Lua et al.
Conclusion: At present time, the evidence derived from this study is not sufficiently convincing
that inhaled ginger aromatherapy is an effective complementary therapy for CINV. The findings
for HRQoL were however encouraging with significant improvement in several domains.
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction
Despite dramatic improvements in antiemetic control con-
ferred by 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains the most worri-
some adverse effects of anti-neoplastic treatment.1,2 As
many as 80% of patients who received anthracycline-based
chemotherapy and cyclophosphamide; a commonly pre-
scribed adjuvant regimens for breast cancer, did experience
some degree of nausea and vomiting.3,4 Poorly controlled
CINV symptoms may result in multiple physiologic conse-
quences, pose impact on patient’s quality of life (QoL) and
alter patient’s compliance with treatment.5—7
In view of the gaps in the current practices, attention
given to the use of complementary and alternative medicine(CAM) as an adjuvant treatment has recently been escalat-
ing. Aromatherapy is a particular kind of CAM widely used for
the purposes of inhalation of the vapors or absorption of the
oil into the skin, to treat or alleviate physical and emotional
symptoms.8 Early clinical trials suggest that aromatherapy
may have some benefit as a complementary treatment in
reducing stress, pain, nausea, and depression.9 In cancer
populations, a recent study had stipulated that 47% (n = 21)
of nauseous oncology patients had settled the symptom
by using personalized aromatherapy inhalation device.10
A compilation of available scientific evidence related to
inhaled aromatherapy had also suggested that the inhaled
vapor of peppermint or ginger essential oil not only reduced
the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting but also
decreased antiemetic requirements and improved patient
satisfaction.11 However, the therapeutic use of aromather-
apy remains controversial possibly due to lack of scientific
effectiveness and safety.
On the other side, ginger, the rhizome of Zingiber
officinale historically has been used in Asian countries, par-
ticularly in China and India for hundreds of years as a
remedy for conditions such as headaches, nausea, rheuma-
tism and colds. Primarily, gingerol is the pungent ketones
that is accountable for the strong aroma of ginger.12 Previous
studies have reported ginger’s effectiveness against nausea
in various conditions including motion sickness; pregnancy-
induced and post-operative nausea.12 In relation to CINV,most studies demonstrated favorable results but a few have
been contradictory.13 Although a firm conclusion cannot be
drawn from previous clinical studies, it is hypothesized that
the direct effect of ginger on the gastrointestinal tract
may be due to the aromatic, spasmolytic carminative and
absorbent properties of ginger.14 While the ingestion of
ginger was associated with minimal toxicity, it was not
without adverse effects. Mild gastrointestinal effects like
heart burn, diarrhea, and irritation of mouth were among
the uncommon side effects. Despite these minimal invasive
properties of ginger, previous studies have used the ingested
formulation of powdered or extract of ginger rather than
aromatherapy. If the ingested form of ginger is safe andlacks toxicity, the inhaled form has greater likelihood of
safety, but the efficacy has not been determined. This study,
therefore aims to determine the impact of aromatherapy
using ginger essential oil in alleviating CINV in breast can-
cer patients. Additionally, patients’ health-related quality
of life (HRQoL) profile following aromatherapy treatment
was also assessed.
Methods
Study design and sample selection
A single-blind, randomized, controlled, cross-over study was
conducted in two oncology clinics whereby the study partic-
ipants were recruited from Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah
(HSNZ), Kuala Terengganu and Hospital Raja Perempuan
Zainab II (HRPZ II), Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. At each
center, standard procedures for nausea and emesis preven-
tion and management were conducted in accordance with
the standard chemotherapy protocol and patient’s clinical
condition. Patients were eligible for this study if they met
the following selection criteria: (1) women aged 18 years
and above, with a normal sense of smell; (2) were diag-
nosed with breast cancer; (3) were receiving chemotherapy
and experienced nausea and/or vomiting of any severity;
(4) had at least two remaining chemotherapy courses usingsimilar chemotherapeutic agents; (5) consenting to partici-
pate in the study. Excluded from this study included those
with other malignancies, being allergic to ginger, perfumes
or cosmetics or patients undergoing concurrent radiothe-
rapy. Patients were randomized using permuted block four
randomization with an allocation ratio 1:1. Permission to
conduct this study was obtained from Malaysia Ministry of
Health’s (MOH) Research and Ethics Committee (MREC) (Ref.
no: (2) dlm.KKM/NIHSEC/08/0804/P11-42).
Intervention procedures
In addition to standard care, an aromatherapy necklace(Murano glass, Mizitco Sdn. Bhd. Sungai Petani, Kedah,
Malaysia) was given to the patients to wear it for five days
during day and night. The aromatherapy necklace was a crys-
tal chamber like a small bottle pendant which was made
from glass which was hang around their neck, and placed
approximately 20 cm from their nose. On each day, patients
were asked to hold the necklace just under their nose and
breathe in deeply at least 3 times a day for at least 3 periods
of 2 min duration, even if they did not have symptoms. This
aromatherapy necklace was filled with either two drops
of ginger essential oil or ginger fragrance oil (fragrance-
matched artificial placebo) depending on the randomization
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
3/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy 3
• •
• •
• •
Figure 1 CONSORT flow diagram.
allocation sequence (Fig. 1). Patients in Group 1 was
provided with ginger fragrance oil (placebo) on their first
chemotherapy course, followed by ginger essential oil on
the next chemotherapy course. In contrary, patients who
were randomized into the Group 2 were first supplied with
ginger essential oil on their first chemotherapy course,
and then were given placebo (ginger fragrance oil) for the
next treatment course. The wash-out period was estimated
around two weeks; the time gap between two consecutivechemotherapy courses. Patients were instructed to remove
the necklace after the treatments were ended. Both ginger
essential oil and fragrance oil were obtained from Take It
Global Sdn. Bhd. Butterworth, Penang, Malaysia; an autho-
rized essential oil dealer for Ungerer Australia PTY LTD.
While ginger essential oil is a naturally-occurring substance
found in ginger rhizome, the fragrance oil (placebo) is a
blend of aroma components that contains ginger oil extract
(a concentrated product) and synthetic materials (typically
the esters, aldehydes and ketones of various aromatics).
Basically, both oils were identical in appearance and tex-
ture but the therapeutic values of fragrance oil may have
decreased substantially due to changes in the chemical
structure of the concentrated product (extract) and mixtureof synthetic components.15 In terms of odor characteristics,
fragrance oil nearly always mimics those of natural essential
oil product yet it usually smells inferior when compared to
the pure essential oil.
Data collection
Every patient needed to complete two phases of study
periods (phase 1 and phase 2). One phase encompassed
five days of aromatherapy intervention starting from the
first day of chemotherapy treatment. Day-1 was denoted
as the day of chemotherapy administration. For every study
phase, data were collected at baseline (prior to chemother-
apy administration), during five days intervention period
(Day-1 till Day-5) as well as on Day-8 post-chemotherapy.
Questionnaires were distributed during the study visit and
collected and checked for missing data at the subsequent
visit.
Outcome measures
Baseline demographic, disease characteristics and treat-
ment information were collected from patient medi-
cal records. Blinding assessment with three categorical
responses (‘believed had ginger essential’, ‘believed had
ginger fragrance’ or ‘did not know either ginger essen-
tial or fragrance oil’) was also completed by the patients.
Patients were asked to report any adverse events that
occurred during aromatherapy intervention period. The
following major outcomes were collected throughout the
study:
Severity of nausea and incidence of vomitingA 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) has been used to measure
the severity of nausea with the left end corresponding to ‘no
nausea’ and the right to ‘severe nausea’.16 No nausea was
defined as VAS < 5 mm and a 10 mm difference was generally
considered clinically important.17 A total of three marks per
day were required as this instrument was to be completed
upon the administration of aromatherapy at 9am, 3pm and
lastly 9pm. This VAS was incorporated in the patient’s diary
card, complimented with the self-report on the frequency
of vomiting within 24 hour. Vomiting was defined as one or
more emetic episode. Episodes were considered different if
they were separated by at least one minute. The patients
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
4/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
4 P.L. Lua et al.
Table 1 Patients’ baseline data at the time of enrolment.
Characteristics Ginger FO/ginger
EO (n = 30),
Group 1
Ginger EO/ginger
FO (n = 30),
Group 2
All patients
(n = 60)
Age 45.9± 9.5 48.7± 8.9 47.3± 9.3
20—39 years 10 (33.3) 4 (13.3) 14 (23.3)
40—59 years 17 (56.7) 23 (76.7) 40 (66.7)60—79 years 3 (10.0) 3 (10.0) 6 (10.0)
Race
Malay 29 (96.7) 30 (100) 59 (98.3)
Other 1 (3.3) — 1 (1.7)
Years after diagnosis (month) 11.6± 12.7 12.0± 12.6 11.8± 12.5
≤1 years 24 (80.0) 23 (76.7) 47 (78.3)
>1 years 6 (20.0) 7 (23.3) 13 (21.7)
Family history of malignancy
Yes 7 (23.3) 15 (50.0) 22 (36.7)
No 21 (70.0) 14 (46.7) 35 (58.3)
Unsure 2 (6.7) 1 (3.3) 3 (5.0)
Breast cancer stage
Stage I 3 (10.0) 2 (6.7) 5 (8.3)
Stage II 18 (60.0) 17 (56.7) 35 (58.3)Stage III 7 (23.3) 8 (26.6) 15 (25.0)
Stage IV 2 (6.7) 3 (10.0) 5 (8.4)
Chemotherapy cycle
2 11 (36.6) 7 (23.3) 18 (30.0)
3 8 (26.7) 7 (23.3) 15 (25.0)
4 8 (26.7) 8 (26.7) 16 (26.7)
5 3 (10.0) 8 (26.7) 11 (18.3)
Chemotherapeutic agentsa
High (>90%) emetic risk
5-Flouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (FEC) 24 (80.0) 21 (70.0) 45 (75.0)
Docetaxel + doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) 5 (16.7) 2 (6.7) 7 (11.7)
Low (10—30%) emetic risk
Docetaxel 1 (3.3) 7 (23.3) 8 (13.3)
Severity of nausea (averaged over time) 27.8± 18.1 26.4± 16.7 27.1± 17.3
Baseline HRQoL (Global health status of EORTC-30) 52.5± 8.8 51.1± 9.5 51.8± 9.1
Data are presented as number and percentage (%) or mean± SD, unless otherwise indicated.a American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines.20
reported the nausea and emetic events in this diary card up
to Day-5 post-chemotherapy.
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
The impact of CINV on patients’ HRQoL was assessed at
baseline (before chemotherapy administration) and Day-
8 post-chemotherapy using the European Organization for
Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Ques-
tionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).18 The translated and validated
version of EORTC QLQ C-30 in the Malay language was
adapted in this study.19 This questionnaire contains 30 items
including five functional scales ( physical, emotional, cogni-
tive, social and role), three symptom scales ( fatigue, pain,
nausea and vomiting), a global health/HRQoL scale and six
single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturb-
ance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea) and financial
impact of disease. The scoring of the EORTC QLQ-C30 was
performed in accordance with the EORTC scoring manual.
The raw scores were linearly transformed to obtain standard
scores in the range of 0—100 for each of the scales and sin-
gle items. A high scale score represented a higher response
level.
Statistical analysis
The planned sample size was 60 patients (30 per sequence)
which was considered large enough to detect a 10 mm dif-
ference (common SD = 19—20) using VAS between the two
treatments with 90% power at the 5% significant level. The
Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) Version 16.0
(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data compilation
and statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and parametric
test were applied. The modified intention-to-treat approach
was applied for all efficacy analysis whereby only patients
who had completed all study phases and received both
inhaled ginger essential oil and ginger fragrance oil were
included in the analysis. Two-factor (group and time) anal-
yses of variance with repeated measures were performed
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
5/9
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
6/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
6 P.L. Lua et al.
Table 3 Two-factor analyses of variance with repeated measure on VAS nausea score and frequency of vomiting comparing
differences between ginger essential oil (EO) and ginger fragrance oil (FO).
Adjusted mean (95% CI) F stat.a (df) P valuea
Ginger FO Ginger EO
Nausea, VAS score (mm)
Day 1 45.08 (36.27, 53.89) 38.98 (33.34, 44.63) Time (T):
Day 2 36.72 (28.00, 45.44) 36.09 (29.69, 42.49) 43.98 (1)
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
7/9
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
8/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
8 P.L. Lua et al.
had limited effects in reducing CINV except for alleviating
acute nausea. Despite frequent reports on aromatherapy
intervention, limited literature was available to make
explicit comparisons. The only study involving the test of
ginger aromatherapy alone was reported by Geiger,21 using
combined applications (naso-cutaneous) to treat nausea
and vomiting induced by anesthesia exposure. Contrary to
the present findings, positive effects of ginger aromather-
apy was denoted in reducing post-operative nausea andvomiting (PONV) using naso-cutaneous application. Geiger21
reported that 80% of high-risk patients had no complaints
of PONV after treated with 5% ginger essential oil in the
post-anesthesia recovery unit. Difference in condition and
methods of application could be the reason for these differ-
ent findings.
On the other hand, the lack of benefits from ginger
essential oil treatment for vomiting occurrences may be
explained by the fact that the administration of 5-HT3 recep-
tor antagonist class of anti-emetic may have significantly
decreased the episode of vomiting as it was rated as low
at all-time points. These anti-emetics are also reported to
be more clinically effective against emesis than they are
against nausea.22—24 Thus, this may have indicated that the
patients within the study may not have been experienc-
ing vomiting at a sufficiently high level of frequency to
have responded to the aromatherapy intervention. Previ-
ous literatures have also demonstrated that once a patient
undergoing chemotherapy experienced any form of nau-
sea and vomiting (whether anticipatory, acute or delayed),
regardless of the emetogenicity of the antineoplastic reg-
imen, the likelihood of that patient experiencing nausea
for the next chemotherapy cycle was significantly higher
and more difficult to treat even with standard anti-emetic
medication.25 Since this study only included patients who
had previously experienced CINV, they might have had
an increased ‘resistance’ to the intervention due to pre-conditioning. This is of particular concern since this study
adopted a crossover design, patients who were initially
in the control group could have established resistance to
the aromatherapy intervention before being subsequently
crossed over. Moreover, delayed symptoms also occur more
frequently with highly emetogenic chemotherapy and are
less responsive to treatment than prevention26 suggesting
possible reasons on the lack of treatment efficacy using gin-
ger essential oil upon delayed symptoms especially in a study
that include a major proportion of patients receiving highly
emetogenic regimens.
It is of interest that Global HRQoL and several sub-
scales of EORTC QLQ-30 (i.e. role functioning, fatigue,
nausea and vomiting, pain and appetite loss) did show sta-tistically significant improvements from baseline following
ginger essential oil inhalation even after limited decrease
of VAS nausea scores (except for acute phase). This result
is congruent with most previous works27,28 related to aro-
matherapy which indicated that although aromatherapy
did not produce detectable effect using objective mea-
surements (i.e. numeric rating scores in pain), positive
subjective outcomes (i.e. patient satisfaction, HRQoL, expe-
rience of pain) were commonly reported by the patients.
Thus, it is possible to suggest that even a relatively low
amount of reduction on the severity of nausea may exert
beneficial impacts on patient reported outcomes measures
such as HRQoL profile. Positive feedbacks by patients them-
selves could be of particular concern and seemed to be of
more importance as they came directly from the patients,
without peripheral interpretation from clinician or anyone
else.29 Moreover, two domains reached a minimal clini-
cally significant change of 10 points from the baseline
scores after application of ginger essential oil i.e. role
functioning (increased) and appetite loss (more markedly
reduced). A reduction in chemotherapy-induced nausea mayplay a role in the reported improvements in these two
domains as patients would feel better to perform their
individual works or responsibilities and help them to enjoy
their foods. It is also possible that, as the chemotherapy
session progressed, patients experienced better HRQoL fol-
lowing their psychological adjustment as the ability to cope
with disease, treatment and effects of treatment would
have been improved after completing several chemotherapy
cycles.30,31
Additionally, there was an increase in constipation after
both ginger essential oil and FO interventions. The most
likely explanation of the increase might be due to the com-
mon side effect of 5TH3 anti-emetics. Since all patients
were prescribed with this prophylaxis medication before
chemotherapy and some received it as maintenance anti-
emetic therapy at home, this symptom may have manifested
within the limited HRQoL assessment period as this side
effect was unlikely to change in the first week after
chemotherapy.
Several limitations of this study deserve mention,
nonetheless. First, the severity of nausea before enrol-
ment was not evaluated. We assumed that the severity of
nausea was almost similar across the groups as patients
were only enrolled after they reported nausea from a pre-
vious chemotherapy cycle. Second, although the patients
were blinded, the possibility of a placebo effect cannot
be ignored. Because of the distinct odor of ginger essen-tial oil, some of the patients who had experienced using
aromatherapy may have recognized the ginger essential oil
perfume. However, the attempt to blind the patients was
quite successful, achieving 93.3% effectiveness. Anyhow,
further exploration on how un-blinded patients detected
treatment allocation either through special characterization
of the oils or probably occurred by chance could additionally
provide better insight.
Conclusions
At the present time, the evidence derived from this study isnot sufficiently convincing that inhaled ginger aromatherapy
is an effective complementary therapy for CINV. The find-
ings for HRQoL were however encouraging with significant
improvement in several domains following this intervention.
The conduct of future studies with an additional control arm
(no treatment) would permit a more accurate comparison of
aromatherapy treatment for the prevention of CINV.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
-
8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…
9/9
Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med (2015),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009
ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model
YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9
Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy 9
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Director General of Health,
staff, respondents and patients of HSNZ and HRPZ II as
well as those who have helped facilitate the process of
this study. Financial support for this project was pro-
vided by the Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Grant number:
UniSZA.B/2/KP9/628).
References
1. Cohen L, de Moor CA,Eisenberg P, Ming EE,Hu H. Chemotherapy-
induced nausea and vomiting: incidence and impact on patient
quality of life at community oncology settings. Support Care
Cancer 2007;15:497—503.
2. Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Geling O, Hansen M,
Cruciani G, et al. Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nau-
sea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer 2004;100:
2261—8.
3. Bourdeanu L, Frankel P, Yu W, Hendrix G, Pal S, Badr
L, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in
Asian women with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-
based adjuvant chemotherapy. J Support Oncol 2012;10:149—54.
4. Roila F, Warr D, Clark-Snow RA, Tonato M, Gralla RJ, Einhorn LH,
et al. Delayed emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
Support Care Cancer 2005;13(2):104—8.
5. Brown V, Sitza J, Richardson A, Hughes J, Hannon H, Oakley
C. The development of the Chemotherapy Symptom Assess-
ment Scale (C-SAS): a scale for the routine clinical assessment
of the symptom experiences of patients. Inter J Nurs Stud
2001;38(5):497—510.
6. Bender CM, McDaniel RW, Murphy-Ende K, Pickett M, Ritten-
berg CN, Rogers MP, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2002;6(2):94—102.
7. Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson R, Mavros P, Hansen M, Herrst-
edt J. Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce
patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emeto-genic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. J Clin Oncol
2006;24:4472—8.
8. Price S, Price L. Aromatherapy for health professionals. 3rd Ed.
Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier; 2007.
9. Steflitsch W, Steflitsch M. Clinical aromatherapy. J Mens Health
2008;5(1):74—85.
10. Stringer J, Donald G. Aromasticks in cancer care: an inno-
vation not to be sniffed at. Complement Ther Clin Pract
2010;17:116—21.
11. Lua PL, Zakaria NS. A brief review of current scientific evidence
involving aromatherapy use for nausea and vomiting. J Altern
Complement Med 2012;18(6):534—40.
12. White B. Ginger: an overview. Am Fam Physician
2007;75:1689—91.
13. Haniadka R, Rajeev AG, Palatty PL, Arora R, Baliga MS.
Zingiber officinale (ginger) as an anti-emetic in cancer
chemotherapy: a review. J AlternComplement Med 2012;18(5):
440—4.
14. Ernst E, Pittler M. Efficacy of ginger for nausea and vomiting:
a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Br J Anaesth
2000;84:367—71.
15. Bauer K, Garbe D, Surburg H. Common fragrance and flavour
materials: preparation and uses. Fourth Edition Weinheim,
Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2001.
16. Borjeson S, Hursti TJ, Peterson C, Fredikson M, Fürst CJ, Avall-
Lundqvist E, et al. Similarities and differences in assessing
nausea on a verbal category scale and a visual analog scale.
Cancer Nurs 1997;20:260—6.
17. YeoW, Mo F, Suen JH, Ho WM, Chan SL, Lau W, et al. A random-
ized study of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone for
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Chinese breastcancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemother-
apy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;113:529—35.
18. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez
NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treat-
ment of Cancer QLQ C30: a quality of life instrument for use
in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst
1993;85:365—76.
19. Yusoff N, Low WY, Yip CH. The Malay version of the European
Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of
Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ C30): reliability and validity
study. Int Med J Malaysia 2010;9(2):45—50.
20. Basch E, Prestud AA, Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Feyer PC, Somer-
field MR, et al. Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical
Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol
2011;29(31):4189—98.
21. Geiger JL. The essential oil of ginger, Zingiber officinale and
anaesthesia. Inter J Aromather 2005;15:7—14.
22. Aapro M. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the management of nau-
sea and vomiting in cancer and cancer treatment. Oncology
2005;69:97—109.
23. Grunberg SM, Osoba D, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ, Borjeson S,
Rapoport BL, et al. Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and
definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity — an update.
Support Care Cancer 2005;13:80—4.
24. Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Bole CW, Zhao H, Hoelzer
KL, et al. 5-Hydroxy tryptamine receptor antagonists versus
prochlorperazine for control of delayed nausea caused by doxo-
rubicin: a URCC CCOP randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol
2005;6:765—72.
25. Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Aapro MS, Molassiotis A, Olver
I. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer
2011;19:1533—8.
26. Schnell FM. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting:
the importance of acute antiemetic control. Oncologist
2003;8:187—98.
27. Gedney J, Glover T, Fillingim R. Sensory and affective pain dis-
crimination after inhalation of essential oils. Psychosom Med
2004;66:599—606.
28. Kim JT, Wajda M, CuffG, Serota D, Schlame M, Axelrod DM, et al.
Evaluation of aromatherapy in treating postoperative pain: pilot
study. Pain Pract 2006;6(4):273—7.
29. Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-
reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research.PerspectClin
Res 2011;2(4):137—44.
30. Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer
patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to
2007. J Exp Clin Canc Res 2008;27:32.
31. Singh H, Kaur K, Singh Banipal RP, Singh S, Bala R. Quality of
life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary
care center in Malwa region of Punjab. Indian J Palliat Care
2014;20:116—22.
http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.els