effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting...

Upload: alberto-kenyo-riofrio-palacios

Post on 07-Jul-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    1/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    Complementary Therapies in Medicine (2015) xxx, xxx—xxx

     Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

    ScienceDirect 

     journa l homepage: www.elsevierheal th.com/ journals/ct im

    Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy onchemotherapy-induced nausea andvomiting and health-related quality of  lifein women with breast cancer

    Pei Lin Luaa,∗

    , Noor Salihahb

    , Nik Mazlanc

    a Community Health Research Cluster, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal  Abidin (UniSZA),

    Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysiab Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Sultan Zainal  Abidin (UniSZA) , Kampus Gong Badak, 21300 Kuala

    Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysiac Kulliyyah of  Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM), Kuantan Campus,

    25710 Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

    Received 18 September 2014; received in revised form 31 December 2014; accepted 27 March 2015

    KEYWORDSAromatherapy;

    Chemotherapy-

    induced nausea

    vomiting;

    Ginger;

    Zingiber officinale;

    Essential oil

    Summary

    Objective: To assess the efficacy of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on nausea, vomiting and

    health-related quality of  life (HRQoL) in chemotherapy breast cancer patients.

    Design: Single-blind, controlled, randomized cross-over study. Patients received 5-day aro-

    matherapy treatment using either ginger essential oil or fragrance-matched artificial placebo

    (ginger fragrance oil) which was instilled in a necklace in an order dictated by the treatment

    group sequence.

    Setting: Two oncology clinics in the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia.

    Main outcome measures: VAS nausea score, frequency of  vomiting and HRQoL profile (EORTC

    QLQ-C30 scores).

    Results: Sixty female patients completed the study (age = 47.3± 9.26 years; Malay = 98.3%; on

    highly emetogenic chemotherapy = 86.7%). The VAS nausea score was significantly lower after

    ginger essential oil inhalation compared to placebo during acute phase (P = 0.040) but not sus-tained for overall treatment effect (treatment effect: F = 1.82, P = 0.183; time effect: F = 43.98,

    P < 0.001; treatment× time effect: F = 2.04; P = 0.102). Similarly, there was no significant effect

    of aromatherapy on vomiting [F (1, 58) = 0.29, P = 0.594]. However, a statistically significant

    change from baseline for  global health status (P < 0.001) was detected after ginger essential

    oil inhalation. A clinically relevant 10 points improvement on role  functioning (P = 0.002) and

    appetite loss (P < 0.001) were also documented while patients were on ginger essential oil.

    ∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +60 9 6688520; fax: +60 9 6687896; mobile: +60 17 6228430.

    E-mail addresses:[email protected], [email protected] (P.L. Lua).

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    0965-2299/© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09652299http://www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/ctimmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.elsevierhealth.com/journals/ctimhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09652299http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    2/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    2 P.L. Lua et al.

    Conclusion: At present time, the evidence derived from this study is not sufficiently convincing

    that inhaled ginger aromatherapy is an effective complementary therapy for CINV. The findings

    for HRQoL were however encouraging with significant improvement in several domains.

    © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Introduction

    Despite dramatic improvements in antiemetic control con-

    ferred by 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains the most worri-

    some adverse effects of  anti-neoplastic treatment.1,2 As

    many as 80% of  patients who received anthracycline-based

    chemotherapy and cyclophosphamide; a commonly pre-

    scribed adjuvant regimens for breast cancer, did experience

    some degree of  nausea and vomiting.3,4 Poorly controlled

    CINV symptoms may result in multiple physiologic conse-

    quences, pose impact on patient’s quality of  life (QoL) and

    alter patient’s compliance with treatment.5—7

    In view of  the gaps in the current practices, attention

    given to the use of complementary and alternative medicine(CAM) as an adjuvant treatment has recently been escalat-

    ing. Aromatherapy is a particular kind of CAM widely used for

    the purposes of inhalation of the vapors or absorption of the

    oil into the skin, to treat or alleviate physical and emotional

    symptoms.8 Early clinical trials suggest that aromatherapy

    may have some benefit as a complementary treatment in

    reducing stress, pain, nausea, and depression.9 In cancer

    populations, a recent study had stipulated that 47% (n = 21)

    of  nauseous oncology patients had settled the symptom

    by using personalized aromatherapy inhalation device.10

    A compilation of  available scientific evidence related to

    inhaled aromatherapy had also suggested that the inhaled

    vapor of peppermint or ginger essential oil not only reduced

    the incidence and severity of  nausea and vomiting but also

    decreased antiemetic requirements and improved patient

    satisfaction.11 However, the therapeutic use of  aromather-

    apy remains controversial possibly due to lack of  scientific

    effectiveness and safety.

    On the other side, ginger, the rhizome of  Zingiber 

    officinale historically has been used in Asian countries, par-

    ticularly in China and India for hundreds of  years as a

    remedy for conditions such as headaches, nausea, rheuma-

    tism and colds. Primarily, gingerol is the pungent ketones

    that is accountable for the strong aroma of ginger.12 Previous

    studies have reported ginger’s effectiveness against nausea

    in various conditions including motion sickness; pregnancy-

    induced and post-operative nausea.12 In relation to CINV,most studies demonstrated favorable results but a few have

    been contradictory.13 Although a firm conclusion cannot be

    drawn from previous clinical studies, it is hypothesized that

    the direct effect of  ginger on the gastrointestinal tract

    may be due to the aromatic, spasmolytic carminative and

    absorbent properties of  ginger.14 While the ingestion of 

    ginger was associated with minimal toxicity, it was not

    without adverse effects. Mild gastrointestinal effects like

    heart burn, diarrhea, and irritation of  mouth were among

    the uncommon side effects. Despite these minimal invasive

    properties of ginger, previous studies have used the ingested

    formulation of  powdered or extract of  ginger rather than

    aromatherapy. If  the ingested form of  ginger is safe andlacks toxicity, the inhaled form has greater likelihood of 

    safety, but the efficacy has not been determined. This study,

    therefore aims to determine the impact of  aromatherapy

    using ginger essential oil in alleviating CINV in breast can-

    cer patients. Additionally, patients’ health-related quality

    of  life (HRQoL) profile following aromatherapy treatment

    was also assessed.

    Methods

    Study design and sample selection

    A single-blind, randomized, controlled, cross-over study was

    conducted in two oncology clinics whereby the study partic-

    ipants were recruited from Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah

    (HSNZ), Kuala Terengganu and Hospital Raja Perempuan

    Zainab II (HRPZ II), Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. At each

    center, standard procedures for nausea and emesis preven-

    tion and management were conducted in accordance with

    the standard chemotherapy protocol and patient’s clinical

    condition. Patients were eligible for this study if  they met

    the following selection criteria: (1) women aged 18 years

    and above, with a normal sense of  smell; (2) were diag-

    nosed with breast cancer; (3) were receiving chemotherapy

    and experienced nausea and/or vomiting of  any severity;

    (4) had at least two remaining chemotherapy courses usingsimilar chemotherapeutic agents; (5) consenting to partici-

    pate in the study. Excluded from this study included those

    with other malignancies, being allergic to ginger, perfumes

    or cosmetics or patients undergoing concurrent radiothe-

    rapy. Patients were randomized using permuted block four

    randomization with an allocation ratio 1:1. Permission to

    conduct this study was obtained from Malaysia Ministry of 

    Health’s (MOH) Research and Ethics Committee (MREC) (Ref.

    no: (2) dlm.KKM/NIHSEC/08/0804/P11-42).

    Intervention procedures

    In addition to standard care, an aromatherapy necklace(Murano glass, Mizitco Sdn. Bhd. Sungai Petani, Kedah,

    Malaysia) was given to the patients to wear it for five days

    during day and night. The aromatherapy necklace was a crys-

    tal chamber like a small bottle pendant which was made

    from glass which was hang around their neck, and placed

    approximately 20 cm from their nose. On each day, patients

    were asked to hold the necklace just under their nose and

    breathe in deeply at least 3 times a day for at least 3 periods

    of 2 min duration, even if  they did not have symptoms. This

    aromatherapy necklace was filled with either two drops

    of  ginger essential oil or ginger fragrance oil (fragrance-

    matched artificial placebo) depending on the randomization

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    3/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy 3

    •  •

    •  •

    •  •

    Figure 1 CONSORT flow diagram.

    allocation sequence (Fig. 1). Patients in Group 1 was

    provided with ginger fragrance oil (placebo) on their first

    chemotherapy course, followed by ginger essential oil on

    the next chemotherapy course. In contrary, patients who

    were randomized into the Group 2 were first supplied with

    ginger essential oil on their first chemotherapy course,

    and then were given placebo (ginger fragrance oil) for the

    next treatment course. The wash-out period was estimated

    around two weeks; the time gap between two consecutivechemotherapy courses. Patients were instructed to remove

    the necklace after the treatments were ended. Both ginger

    essential oil and fragrance oil were obtained from Take It

    Global Sdn. Bhd. Butterworth, Penang, Malaysia; an autho-

    rized essential oil dealer for Ungerer Australia PTY LTD.

    While ginger essential oil is a naturally-occurring substance

    found in ginger rhizome, the fragrance oil (placebo) is a

    blend of aroma components that contains ginger oil extract

    (a concentrated product) and synthetic materials (typically

    the esters, aldehydes and ketones of  various aromatics).

    Basically, both oils were identical in appearance and tex-

    ture but the therapeutic values of  fragrance oil may have

    decreased substantially due to changes in the chemical

    structure of the concentrated product (extract) and mixtureof synthetic components.15 In terms of odor characteristics,

    fragrance oil nearly always mimics those of natural essential

    oil product yet it usually smells inferior when compared to

    the pure essential oil.

    Data collection

    Every patient needed to complete two phases of  study

    periods (phase 1 and phase 2). One phase encompassed

    five days of  aromatherapy intervention starting from the

    first day of  chemotherapy treatment. Day-1 was denoted

    as the day of chemotherapy administration. For every study

    phase, data were collected at baseline (prior to chemother-

    apy administration), during five days intervention period

    (Day-1 till Day-5) as well as on Day-8 post-chemotherapy.

    Questionnaires were distributed during the study visit and

    collected and checked for missing data at the subsequent

    visit.

    Outcome measures

    Baseline demographic, disease characteristics and treat-

    ment information were collected from patient medi-

    cal records. Blinding assessment with three categorical

    responses (‘believed had ginger essential’, ‘believed had

    ginger fragrance’ or ‘did not know either ginger essen-

    tial or fragrance oil’) was also completed by the patients.

    Patients were asked to report any adverse events that

    occurred during aromatherapy intervention period. The

    following major outcomes were collected throughout the

    study:

    Severity of nausea and incidence of vomitingA 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) has been used to measure

    the severity of nausea with the left end corresponding to ‘no

    nausea’ and the right to ‘severe nausea’.16 No nausea was

    defined as VAS < 5 mm and a 10 mm difference was generally

    considered clinically important.17 A total of three marks per

    day were required as this instrument was to be completed

    upon the administration of  aromatherapy at 9am, 3pm and

    lastly 9pm. This VAS was incorporated in the patient’s diary

    card, complimented with the self-report on the frequency

    of  vomiting within 24 hour. Vomiting was defined as one or

    more emetic episode. Episodes were considered different if 

    they were separated by at least one minute. The patients

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    4/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    4 P.L. Lua et al.

    Table 1 Patients’ baseline data at the time of enrolment.

    Characteristics Ginger FO/ginger

    EO (n = 30),

    Group 1

    Ginger EO/ginger

    FO (n = 30),

    Group 2

    All patients

    (n = 60)

    Age 45.9± 9.5 48.7± 8.9 47.3± 9.3

    20—39 years 10 (33.3) 4 (13.3) 14 (23.3)

    40—59 years 17 (56.7) 23 (76.7) 40 (66.7)60—79 years 3 (10.0) 3 (10.0) 6 (10.0)

    Race

    Malay 29 (96.7) 30 (100) 59 (98.3)

    Other 1 (3.3) — 1 (1.7)

    Years after diagnosis (month) 11.6± 12.7 12.0± 12.6 11.8± 12.5

    ≤1 years 24 (80.0) 23 (76.7) 47 (78.3)

    >1 years 6 (20.0) 7 (23.3) 13 (21.7)

    Family history of  malignancy

    Yes 7 (23.3) 15 (50.0) 22 (36.7)

    No 21 (70.0) 14 (46.7) 35 (58.3)

    Unsure 2 (6.7) 1 (3.3) 3 (5.0)

    Breast cancer stage

    Stage I 3 (10.0) 2 (6.7) 5 (8.3)

    Stage II 18 (60.0) 17 (56.7) 35 (58.3)Stage III 7 (23.3) 8 (26.6) 15 (25.0)

    Stage IV 2 (6.7) 3 (10.0) 5 (8.4)

    Chemotherapy cycle

    2 11 (36.6) 7 (23.3) 18 (30.0)

    3 8 (26.7) 7 (23.3) 15 (25.0)

    4 8 (26.7) 8 (26.7) 16 (26.7)

    5 3 (10.0) 8 (26.7) 11 (18.3)

    Chemotherapeutic agentsa

    High (>90%) emetic risk

    5-Flouracil + epirubicin + cyclophosphamide (FEC) 24 (80.0) 21 (70.0) 45 (75.0)

    Docetaxel + doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) 5 (16.7) 2 (6.7) 7 (11.7)

    Low (10—30%) emetic risk

    Docetaxel 1 (3.3) 7 (23.3) 8 (13.3)

    Severity of nausea (averaged over time) 27.8± 18.1 26.4± 16.7 27.1± 17.3

    Baseline HRQoL (Global health status of EORTC-30) 52.5± 8.8 51.1± 9.5 51.8± 9.1

    Data are presented as number and percentage (%) or mean± SD, unless otherwise indicated.a American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines.20

    reported the nausea and emetic events in this diary card up

    to Day-5 post-chemotherapy.

    Health-related quality of  life (HRQoL)

    The impact of  CINV on patients’ HRQoL was assessed at

    baseline (before chemotherapy administration) and Day-

    8 post-chemotherapy using the European Organization for

    Research and Treatment of  Cancer Quality of  Life Ques-

    tionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).18 The translated and validated

    version of  EORTC QLQ  C-30 in the Malay language was

    adapted in this study.19 This questionnaire contains 30 items

    including five functional scales ( physical, emotional, cogni-

    tive, social and role), three symptom scales ( fatigue, pain,

    nausea and vomiting), a  global health/HRQoL scale and six

    single items assessing symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturb-

    ance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea) and  financial

    impact of  disease. The scoring of  the EORTC QLQ-C30 was

    performed in accordance with the EORTC scoring manual.

    The raw scores were linearly transformed to obtain standard

    scores in the range of  0—100 for each of  the scales and sin-

    gle items. A high scale score represented a higher response

    level.

    Statistical analysis

    The planned sample size was 60 patients (30 per sequence)

    which was considered large enough to detect a 10 mm dif-

    ference (common SD = 19—20) using VAS between the two

    treatments with 90% power at the 5% significant level. The

    Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) Version 16.0

    (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data compilation

    and statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics and parametric

    test were applied. The modified intention-to-treat approach

    was applied for all efficacy analysis whereby only patients

    who had completed all study phases and received both

    inhaled ginger essential oil and ginger fragrance oil were

    included in the analysis. Two-factor (group and time) anal-

    yses of  variance with repeated measures were performed

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    5/9

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    6/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    6 P.L. Lua et al.

    Table 3 Two-factor analyses of  variance with repeated measure on VAS nausea score and frequency of  vomiting comparing

    differences between ginger essential oil (EO) and ginger fragrance oil (FO).

    Adjusted mean (95% CI)   F stat.a (df)   P valuea

    Ginger FO Ginger EO

    Nausea, VAS score (mm)

    Day 1 45.08 (36.27, 53.89) 38.98 (33.34, 44.63) Time (T):

    Day 2 36.72 (28.00, 45.44) 36.09 (29.69, 42.49) 43.98 (1)

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    7/9

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    8/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    8 P.L. Lua et al.

    had limited effects in reducing CINV except for alleviating

    acute nausea. Despite frequent reports on aromatherapy

    intervention, limited literature was available to make

    explicit comparisons. The only study involving the test of 

    ginger aromatherapy alone was reported by Geiger,21 using

    combined applications (naso-cutaneous) to treat nausea

    and vomiting induced by anesthesia exposure. Contrary to

    the present findings, positive effects of  ginger aromather-

    apy was denoted in reducing post-operative nausea andvomiting (PONV) using naso-cutaneous application. Geiger21

    reported that 80% of  high-risk patients had no complaints

    of  PONV after treated with 5% ginger essential oil in the

    post-anesthesia recovery unit. Difference in condition and

    methods of application could be the reason for these differ-

    ent findings.

    On the other hand, the lack of  benefits from ginger

    essential oil treatment for vomiting occurrences may be

    explained by the fact that the administration of 5-HT3 recep-

    tor antagonist class of  anti-emetic may have significantly

    decreased the episode of  vomiting as it was rated as low

    at all-time points. These anti-emetics are also reported to

    be more clinically effective against emesis than they are

    against nausea.22—24 Thus, this may have indicated that the

    patients within the study may not have been experienc-

    ing vomiting at a sufficiently high level of  frequency to

    have responded to the aromatherapy intervention. Previ-

    ous literatures have also demonstrated that once a patient

    undergoing chemotherapy experienced any form of  nau-

    sea and vomiting (whether anticipatory, acute or delayed),

    regardless of  the emetogenicity of  the antineoplastic reg-

    imen, the likelihood of  that patient experiencing nausea

    for the next chemotherapy cycle was significantly higher

    and more difficult to treat even with standard anti-emetic

    medication.25 Since this study only included patients who

    had previously experienced CINV, they might have had

    an increased ‘resistance’ to the intervention due to pre-conditioning. This is of  particular concern since this study

    adopted a crossover design, patients who were initially

    in the control group could have established resistance to

    the aromatherapy intervention before being subsequently

    crossed over. Moreover, delayed symptoms also occur more

    frequently with highly emetogenic chemotherapy and are

    less responsive to treatment than prevention26 suggesting

    possible reasons on the lack of treatment efficacy using gin-

    ger essential oil upon delayed symptoms especially in a study

    that include a major proportion of  patients receiving highly

    emetogenic regimens.

    It is of  interest that Global HRQoL and several sub-

    scales of  EORTC QLQ-30 (i.e. role  functioning,  fatigue,

    nausea and vomiting, pain and appetite loss) did show sta-tistically significant improvements from baseline following

    ginger essential oil inhalation even after limited decrease

    of  VAS nausea scores (except for acute phase). This result

    is congruent with most previous works27,28 related to aro-

    matherapy which indicated that although aromatherapy

    did not produce detectable effect using objective mea-

    surements (i.e. numeric rating scores in pain), positive

    subjective outcomes (i.e. patient satisfaction, HRQoL, expe-

    rience of  pain) were commonly reported by the patients.

    Thus, it is possible to suggest that even a relatively low

    amount of  reduction on the severity of  nausea may exert

    beneficial impacts on patient reported outcomes measures

    such as HRQoL profile. Positive feedbacks by patients them-

    selves could be of  particular concern and seemed to be of 

    more importance as they came directly from the patients,

    without peripheral interpretation from clinician or anyone

    else.29 Moreover, two domains reached a minimal clini-

    cally significant change of  10 points from the baseline

    scores after application of  ginger essential oil i.e. role

     functioning (increased) and appetite loss (more markedly

    reduced). A reduction in chemotherapy-induced nausea mayplay a role in the reported improvements in these two

    domains as patients would feel better to perform their

    individual works or responsibilities and help them to enjoy

    their foods. It is also possible that, as the chemotherapy

    session progressed, patients experienced better HRQoL fol-

    lowing their psychological adjustment as the ability to cope

    with disease, treatment and effects of  treatment would

    have been improved after completing several chemotherapy

    cycles.30,31

    Additionally, there was an increase in constipation after

    both ginger essential oil and FO interventions. The most

    likely explanation of  the increase might be due to the com-

    mon side effect of  5TH3   anti-emetics. Since all patients

    were prescribed with this prophylaxis medication before

    chemotherapy and some received it as maintenance anti-

    emetic therapy at home, this symptom may have manifested

    within the limited HRQoL assessment period as this side

    effect was unlikely to change in the first week after

    chemotherapy.

    Several limitations of  this study deserve mention,

    nonetheless. First, the severity of  nausea before enrol-

    ment was not evaluated. We assumed that the severity of 

    nausea was almost similar across the groups as patients

    were only enrolled after they reported nausea from a pre-

    vious chemotherapy cycle. Second, although the patients

    were blinded, the possibility of  a placebo effect cannot

    be ignored. Because of  the distinct odor of  ginger essen-tial oil, some of  the patients who had experienced using

    aromatherapy may have recognized the ginger essential oil

    perfume. However, the attempt to blind the patients was

    quite successful, achieving 93.3% effectiveness. Anyhow,

    further exploration on how un-blinded patients detected

    treatment allocation either through special characterization

    of the oils or probably occurred by chance could additionally

    provide better insight.

    Conclusions

    At the present time, the evidence derived from this study isnot sufficiently convincing that inhaled ginger aromatherapy

    is an effective complementary therapy for CINV. The find-

    ings for HRQoL were however encouraging with significant

    improvement in several domains following this intervention.

    The conduct of future studies with an additional control arm

    (no treatment) would permit a more accurate comparison of 

    aromatherapy treatment for the prevention of  CINV.

    Conflict of interest statement

    None declared.

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

  • 8/18/2019 Effects of Inhaled Ginger Aromatherapy on Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting and Health-related Qualit…

    9/9

    Please cite this article in press as: Lua PL, et al. Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy on chemotherapy-induced

    nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of  life in women with breast cancer. Complement Ther  Med  (2015),

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009

    ARTICLE IN PRESS+Model

    YCTIM-1440; No.of Pages9

    Effects of  inhaled ginger aromatherapy 9

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are grateful to the Director General of  Health,

    staff, respondents and patients of  HSNZ and HRPZ II as

    well as those who have helped facilitate the process of 

    this study. Financial support for this project was pro-

    vided by the Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (Grant number:

    UniSZA.B/2/KP9/628).

    References

    1. Cohen L, de Moor CA,Eisenberg P, Ming EE,Hu H. Chemotherapy-

    induced nausea and vomiting: incidence and impact on patient

    quality of life at community oncology settings. Support Care

    Cancer 2007;15:497—503.

    2. Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Geling O, Hansen M,

    Cruciani G, et al. Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nau-

    sea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer  2004;100:

    2261—8.

    3. Bourdeanu L, Frankel P, Yu W, Hendrix G, Pal S, Badr

    L, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in

    Asian women with breast cancer receiving anthracycline-

    based adjuvant chemotherapy.  J Support Oncol 2012;10:149—54.

    4. Roila F, Warr D, Clark-Snow RA, Tonato M, Gralla RJ, Einhorn LH,

    et al. Delayed emesis: moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

    Support Care Cancer 2005;13(2):104—8.

    5. Brown V, Sitza J, Richardson A, Hughes J, Hannon H, Oakley

    C. The development of the Chemotherapy Symptom Assess-

    ment Scale (C-SAS): a scale for the routine clinical assessment

    of the symptom experiences of patients. Inter J Nurs Stud  

    2001;38(5):497—510.

    6. Bender CM, McDaniel RW, Murphy-Ende K, Pickett M, Ritten-

    berg CN, Rogers MP, et al. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and

    vomiting. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2002;6(2):94—102.

    7. Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson R, Mavros P, Hansen M, Herrst-

    edt J. Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce

    patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emeto-genic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. J Clin Oncol

    2006;24:4472—8.

    8. Price S, Price L. Aromatherapy for health professionals. 3rd Ed.

    Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone: Elsevier; 2007.

    9. Steflitsch W, Steflitsch M. Clinical aromatherapy.  J Mens Health

    2008;5(1):74—85.

    10. Stringer J, Donald G. Aromasticks in cancer care: an inno-

    vation not to be sniffed at. Complement Ther Clin Pract

    2010;17:116—21.

    11. Lua PL, Zakaria NS. A brief review of current scientific evidence

    involving aromatherapy use for nausea and vomiting.  J Altern

    Complement Med 2012;18(6):534—40.

    12. White B. Ginger: an overview.  Am Fam Physician

    2007;75:1689—91.

    13. Haniadka R, Rajeev AG, Palatty PL, Arora R, Baliga MS.

    Zingiber officinale (ginger) as an anti-emetic in cancer

    chemotherapy: a review. J AlternComplement Med 2012;18(5):

    440—4.

    14. Ernst E, Pittler M. Efficacy of ginger for nausea and vomiting:

    a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Br J Anaesth

    2000;84:367—71.

    15. Bauer K, Garbe D, Surburg H. Common fragrance and flavour 

    materials: preparation and uses. Fourth Edition Weinheim,

    Germany: Wiley-VCH; 2001.

    16. Borjeson S, Hursti TJ, Peterson C, Fredikson M, Fürst CJ, Avall-

    Lundqvist E, et al. Similarities and differences in assessing

    nausea on a verbal category scale and a visual analog scale.

    Cancer Nurs 1997;20:260—6.

    17. YeoW, Mo F, Suen JH, Ho WM, Chan SL, Lau W, et al. A random-

    ized study of aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone for

    chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Chinese breastcancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemother-

    apy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009;113:529—35.

    18. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez

    NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treat-

    ment of Cancer QLQ C30: a quality of life instrument for use

    in international clinical trials in oncology.  J Natl Cancer Inst

    1993;85:365—76.

    19. Yusoff N, Low WY, Yip CH. The Malay version of the European

    Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of 

    Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ C30): reliability and validity

    study. Int Med J Malaysia 2010;9(2):45—50.

    20. Basch E, Prestud AA, Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Feyer PC, Somer-

    field MR, et al. Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical

    Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.  J Clin Oncol

    2011;29(31):4189—98.

    21. Geiger JL. The essential oil of ginger, Zingiber officinale and

    anaesthesia. Inter J Aromather 2005;15:7—14.

    22. Aapro M. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the management of nau-

    sea and vomiting in cancer and cancer treatment. Oncology 

    2005;69:97—109.

    23. Grunberg SM, Osoba D, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ, Borjeson S,

    Rapoport BL, et al. Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and

    definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity — an update.

    Support Care Cancer 2005;13:80—4.

    24. Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Bole CW, Zhao H, Hoelzer

    KL, et al. 5-Hydroxy tryptamine receptor antagonists versus

    prochlorperazine for control of delayed nausea caused by doxo-

    rubicin: a URCC CCOP randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol

    2005;6:765—72.

    25. Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, Aapro MS, Molassiotis A, Olver

    I. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Support Care Cancer 

    2011;19:1533—8.

    26. Schnell FM. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting:

    the importance of acute antiemetic control. Oncologist

    2003;8:187—98.

    27. Gedney J, Glover T, Fillingim R. Sensory and affective pain dis-

    crimination after inhalation of essential oils. Psychosom Med 

    2004;66:599—606.

    28. Kim JT, Wajda M, CuffG, Serota D, Schlame M, Axelrod DM, et al.

    Evaluation of aromatherapy in treating postoperative pain: pilot

    study. Pain Pract 2006;6(4):273—7.

    29. Deshpande PR, Rajan S, Sudeepthi BL, Abdul Nazir CP. Patient-

    reported outcomes: a new era in clinical research.PerspectClin

    Res 2011;2(4):137—44.

    30. Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer

    patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to

    2007.  J Exp Clin Canc Res 2008;27:32.

    31. Singh H, Kaur K, Singh Banipal RP, Singh S, Bala R. Quality of 

    life in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a tertiary

    care center in Malwa region of Punjab. Indian J Palliat Care

    2014;20:116—22.

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2015.03.009http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0160http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0165http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0170http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0175http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0180http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0185http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0190http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0195http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0200http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0205http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0310http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0305http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0300http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0295http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0290http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0285http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0280http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0275http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0270http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0265http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0260http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0255http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0250http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0245http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0240http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0235http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0230http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0225http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0220http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0215http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.elsevier.com/S0965-2299(15)00054-0/sbref0210http://refhub.els