effect of the tles-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties s.naitamor, o.boumia,...
Post on 22-Dec-2015
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties
S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF
![Page 2: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Past analysis using two receivers in different locations showed that the TLE-Receiver distance plays an important role in determining the VLF signals perturbations properties
![Page 3: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
In this present work we will use one receiver data observation of different events locations
Event 1 : -4.63 °E 48.57 °N
Event 2 : 0.99 °E 40.87 °N
Event 3 : 4.37 °E 40.01 °NEvent 4 : 5.59 °E 43.83 °N
![Page 4: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Event 1 & 2 comparison
Event 1 : -4.63 °E 48.57 °N
Event 2 : 0.99 °E 40.87 °N
Amp = 1 dB
Perturbation duration ~ 240 s
Amp ~ 0.8 dB
Perturbation duration > 280 s
![Page 5: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Event 3 & 4 comparison
Event 3 : 4.37 °E 40.01 °N
Event 4 : 5.59 °E 43.83 °N
Amp = 1 dB
Perturbation duration > 180s
Amp = 3 dB
Perturbation duration ~ 120s
![Page 6: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2200
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50e
ven
t ra
te %
Onset duration
Far from the receiverNear the receiver
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2200
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Eve
nts
Ra
te (
%)
Duration time
Far from the receiverNear the receiver
0 1 2 30
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Am
plit
ud
e r
ate
(%
)
Amplitude (dB)
Far from the eceiverNear the receiver
Perturbations due to distant disturbances have a short recovery time
![Page 7: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Two Receivers signals perturbations in association with a Gigantic Jet
![Page 8: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
In time interval of 120 ms, two TLEs were captured : A GJ after the –CG and a Sprite after the +CG.
From the plot the Early signal perturbation reached its maximum in 40 ms after the –CG and 60 ms before the +CG.
After the +CG the perturbation continued in both signals
![Page 9: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The distant receiver did not recorded a significant perturbation associated to
the GJ
Two receivers data comparison
The signal perturbation recovered rapidly in the distant receiver data
than the near receiver one
![Page 10: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusion
The data comparison proved that the distance to the receiver plays an important role in determining the signals perturbations amplitudes and the recovery time
The statistical study showed that the distant disturbances have their associated perturbations with small amplitudes and short recovery time
The comparison between the two receivers data (at Tunis and Sebha) in association with the GJ observation gives a clear evidence that some signal perturbation maybe missed by the distant receiver
![Page 11: Effect of the TLEs-receiver distance on the signal perturbations properties S.NAITAMOR, O.BOUMIA, T.ABDELATIF](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062421/56649d7f5503460f94a620d7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Thank you