effect of feedstock properties on conversion and yields fluid cata/ tic crackin and thermal crackin...

6
REFINING uid Cata/ Cra and ermal C of Vacuum Gas O Effect of Feedstock Properties on Conversion and Yields By D. S EV, I. SHISHKO, A. VELI, R. NIKOLO, D. D. SA TIEV, M. MITKOVA, and D. YORDANOV* Abstract is article discusses the effect vacuum gas oil perties on activi, conveion, and yields in fluid catalytic ccking and thermal ccking. Litetu data for cata- lytic cracking 35 vacuum gas oi and thermal ccng of four vacuum gas oils we processed and correlations were devel- oped. The vacuum gas oil activi in both fluid catalytic ccking and thermal cck- ing was found to increase with the satute content, and decase with the amatic car- bon content. At approximately the same con- veion level thermal ccking yiel the same diesel as fluid catalytic ccking, and ha the soline yield of fluid catalytic ccng at the expense of a much higher gas yield. e chacterization the vacuum gas oils used asetocr fluid catalytic ccking and thermal ccking by their satu- te, amatic carbon and hydgen con- tenʦ gives reliable irmation for predic- tion conveion and yields in both hea oil conveion pcesses. e higher the sat- ute and hydrogen contents, and the lower the aromatic carbon content the higher the conversion in both fluid catalytic ccking and thermal ccking. 1 Introduction Conversion levels in the heavy oil upgrading processes mainly control the economics of modern oil refining. This is, because the heavy oil conversion processes can convert the low value heavy oils into high value transportation els. Coersion in these processes is either thermal or catalytic. The most prominent heavy oil catalytic conver- sion process is fluid catalytic cracking (FCC). It is widely used to convert vacuum gas oils (VGO), atmospheric residua and blends ofVGO with residual oils [l]. FCC can process residual edstocks up to a maxi- mum Conradson carbon content (CCR) of 8% [2]. The higher CCR residual oils can be con- • Prof Dr Dicho Stratiev, (E-mail: satiev.dicho@neſto- chim.bg), Dr. Ivelina Shishkova, Danail Stratiev, LOIL Neſtohim Burgas AD, Burgas, Bulgaria; Ani li, Rados- lava Nikolova, Assoc. Prof Dr. Magdalena Mitkova, Assoc. Prof Dr. Dobromir Yordanov, Burgas University "Assen Zla- tarov". 0179-3187/17/II DOI 10.19225/170605 © 2017 EID Energie Inrmationsdienst GmbH OG84 verted into light oil products by application of catalytic hydrocracking or thermal crack- ing in its different rms: visbreaking, de- l ed coking, and flexicoking. For both cata- lytic drocracking and thermal cracking processes the residue conversion is essen- tially a thermal conversion. The role of the catalyst and the hydrogen in residue catalytic drocracking is to suppress the undesirable condensation reactions. The catalysts in res- idue hydrocracking typically do not contrib- ute to the residue conversion [3-5]. Studies highlighted that residue edstock quality is the single variable that has the biggest im- pact on conversion level in the heavy oil con- version processes [6, 7]. This can explain the interest in the characterization of the heavy oils and the aim to relate this inrmation to the heavy oil behavior during its conversion. Several investigations hꜹe reported that conversion and product yields can be pre- dicted om data of edstock characteriza- tion r fluid catalytic cracking [8-10]. However, data r thermal cracking ofrty vacuum residual oils reported in [11] and of thirteen other thermal cracking edstocks studied in [6] showed no statistical meaning- l relationships between any of the ed- stock properties and the coersion level. The vacuum residual oils (VROs) are the most difficult of all oils to characterize be- cause of their low volatility, high polarity, and compositional polydispersity [12]. That is why we decided to cus on thermal and catalytic conversion ofthe easier to charac- terize vacuum gas oils (VGOs) with the aim to reveal which edstock parameters may control conversion and yields. As a result of a literature review, data on catalytic cracking of35 heavy oils (VGOs and oils that contain residua) and thermal cracking ofur VGOs were collected. The data were processed and some common relationships were und. The aim of this work is to discuss the rela- tionship between edstock properties and coersion and yields in the processes FCC and thermal cracking ofvacuum gas oils. 2 Experimental The data r catalic cracking of the 35 vac- uum oils were collected om the rerences [8, 13-15]. Physical and chemical properties ofthe 35 vacuum gas oils are summarized in Table 1. These heavy oils were cracked on equilibrium catalysts in laboratory micro- activity test (M) FCC units and in an ACE (advanced cracking equipment) unit. The se- verity was changed by variation of cata- lyst-to-oil ratio between one and eight wt/wt. The time on stream employed in these studies was between 30 and 100 seconds. The reaction temperature was between 490 and 535 °C. Coersion is defined as 100 - (LCO+HCO). Light cycle oil (LCO) and heavy cycle oil (HCO) are the yield actions in the cracking products as wt.% ofthe ed with cut-points of 210 °C<LC0<343 °C <HCO. For 17 of the studied FCC edstocks the yields were compared at the point of maximum gasoline yield. For the other 18 FCC edstocks the yields were compared at the maximum catalyst-to-oil ratio, which was between 7 and 8 /wt. For these eds there was no proofthat overcracking had oc- curred. Details on the cracking experimental procedures and the methods used to charac- terize the FCC edstocks are given in [8, 13-15]. ble 2 also presents data of FCC conversion and product yields obtained om the 35 FCC edstocks. The data r thermal cracking of the ur VGOs were taken om [16]. The physical and chemical properties of the ur VGO thermal cracking (TC) eds are given in - ble 3. Table 3 also presents data on conver- sion and product yields obtained om the ur TC edstocks at 20 minutes ofreaction time. Thermal cracking of the ur VGOs was perrmed at 810 °C. Details of the ther- mal cracking experimental procedure are given in [16]. 3 Results and Discussion 3.1 Fluid catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oils By developing a correlation matrix of FCC ed properties, yields and conversion the relationships between certain ed proper- ties and FCC yields can be distinguished. - ble 4 presents this correlation matrix, which shows that the conversion best correlates with the edstock aromatic carbon and hy- drogen content. Since nitrogen content also has a negative impact on conversion [17], al- though weaker than edstock aromatic car- bon and drogen content, it was included in OIL GAS European Magazine 2/2017

Upload: hoangcong

Post on 13-Mar-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

REFINING

Fluid Cata/ tic Crackin and Thermal Crackin of Vacuum Gas Oils

Effect of Feedstock Properties on Conversion and Yields By D. STRA TIEV, I. SHISHKOVA, A. VELI, R. NIKOLOVA, D. D. STRA TIEV, M. MITKOVA, and D. YORDANOV*

Abstract This article discusses the effect of vacuum gas oil properties on reactivity, conversion, and yields in fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking. Literature data for cata­lytic cracking of 35 vacuum gas oils and thermal cracking of four vacuum gas oils were processed and correlations were devel­oped. The vacuum gas oil reactivity in both fluid catalytic cracking and thermal crack­ing was found to increase with the saturate content, and decrease with the aromatic car­bon content. At approximately the same con­version level thermal cracking yields the same diesel as fluid catalytic cracking, and half the gasoline yield of fluid catalytic cracking at the expense of a much higher gas yield. The characterization of the vacuum gas oils used as feedstocks for fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking by their satu­rate, aromatic carbon and hydrogen con­tents gives reliable information for predic­tion of conversion and yields in both heavy oil conversion processes. The higher the sat­urate and hydrogen contents, and the lower the aromatic carbon content the higher the conversion in both fluid catalytic cracking and thermal cracking.

1 Introduction Conversion levels in the heavy oil upgrading processes mainly control the economics of modern oil refining. This is, because the heavy oil conversion processes can convert the low value heavy oils into high value transportation fuels. Conversion in these processes is either thermal or catalytic. The most prominent heavy oil catalytic conver­sion process is fluid catalytic cracking (FCC). It is widely used to convert vacuum gas oils (VGO), atmospheric residua and blends ofVGO with residual oils [l]. FCC can process residual feedstocks up to a maxi­mum Conradson carbon content (CCR) of 8% [2]. The higher CCR residual oils can be con-

• Prof. Dr Dicho Stratiev, (E-mail: stratiev.dicho@nefto­chim.bg), Dr. Ivelina Shishkova, Danail Stratiev, LUKOIL Neftohim Burgas AD, Burgas, Bulgaria; Anife Veli, Rados­lava Nikolova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Magdalena Mitkova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Dobromir Yordanov, Burgas University "Assen Zla­tarov".

0179-3187/17/II DOI 10.19225/170605 © 2017 EID Energie Informationsdienst GmbH

OG84

verted into light oil products by application of catalytic hydrocracking or thermal crack­ing in its different forms: visbreaking, de­layed coking, and flexicoking. For both cata­lytic hydrocracking and thermal cracking processes the residue conversion is essen­tially a thermal conversion. The role of the catalyst and the hydrogen in residue catalytic hydrocracking is to suppress the undesirable condensation reactions. The catalysts in res­idue hydrocracking typically do not contrib­ute to the residue conversion [3-5]. Studies highlighted that residue feedstock quality is the single variable that has the biggest im­pact on conversion level in the heavy oil con­version processes [ 6, 7]. This can explain the interest in the characterization of the heavy oils and the aim to relate this information to the heavy oil behavior during its conversion. Several investigations have reported that conversion and product yields can be pre­dicted from data of feedstock characteriza­tion for fluid catalytic cracking [8-10]. However, data for thermal cracking of forty vacuum residual oils reported in [11] and of thirteen other thermal cracking feedstocks studied in [ 6] showed no statistical meaning­ful relationships between any of the feed­stock properties and the conversion level. The vacuum residual oils (VROs) are the most difficult of all oils to characterize be­cause of their low volatility, high polarity, and compositional polydispersity [12]. That is why we decided to focus on thermal and catalytic conversion of the easier to charac­terize vacuum gas oils (VGOs) with the aim to reveal which feedstock parameters may control conversion and yields. As a result of a literature review, data on catalytic cracking of35 heavy oils (VGOs and oils that contain residua) and thermal cracking of four VGOs were collected. The data were processed and some common relationships were found. The aim of this work is to discuss the rela­tionship between feedstock properties and conversion and yields in the processes FCC and thermal cracking of vacuum gas oils.

2 Experimental The data for catalytic cracking of the 3 5 vac­uum oils were collected from the references [8, 13-15]. Physical and chemical properties of the 35 vacuum gas oils are summarized in

Table 1. These heavy oils were cracked on equilibrium catalysts in laboratory micro­activity test (MAT) FCC units and in an ACE ( advanced cracking equipment) unit. The se­verity was changed by variation of cata­lyst-to-oil ratio between one and eight wt/wt. The time on stream employed in these studies was between 30 and 100 seconds. The reaction temperature was between 490 and 535 °C. Conversion is defined as 100 -(LCO+HCO). Light cycle oil (LCO) and heavy cycle oil (H CO) are the yield fractions in the cracking products as wt.% of the feed with cut-points of 210 °C<LC0<343 °C <HCO. For 17 of the studied FCC feedstocks the yields were compared at the point of maximum gasoline yield. For the other 18 FCC feedstocks the yields were compared at the maximum catalyst-to-oil ratio, which was between 7 and 8 wt/wt. For these feeds there was no proof that overcracking had oc­curred. Details on the cracking experimental procedures and the methods used to charac­terize the FCC feedstocks are given in [8, 13-15]. Table 2 also presents data of FCC conversion and product yields obtained from the 35 FCC feedstocks. The data for thermal cracking of the four VGOs were taken from [16]. The physical and chemical properties of the four VGO thermal cracking (TC) feeds are given in Ta­ble 3. Table 3 also presents data on conver­sion and product yields obtained from the four TC feedstocks at 20 minutes of reaction time. Thermal cracking of the four VGOs was performed at 810 °C. Details of the ther­mal cracking experimental procedure are given in [ 16].

3 Results and Discussion 3.1 Fluid catalytic cracking of vacuum gas oils By developing a correlation matrix of FCC feed properties, yields and conversion the relationships between certain feed proper­ties and FCC yields can be distinguished. Ta­ble 4 presents this correlation matrix, which shows that the conversion best correlates with the feedstock aromatic carbon and hy­drogen content. Since nitrogen content also has a negative impact on conversion [17], al­though weaker than feedstock aromatic car­bon and hydrogen content, it was included in

OIL GAS European Magazine 2/2017