effect of bone shaft geometry in its bending
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
1/32
Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry
in its Bending
Presented by
Naveen Meena 07010326Shailendra kumar Meena 07010346
Group no. B03
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
2/32
IntroductionThe determination of the internal stress field induced in the
human femur under the action of forces is of significant
importance both for the localization of the more severely
loaded areas from which fractures would initiate and for
the efficient design of implants and joint replacements.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
3/32
Femury The femur is the largest, longest, and strongest bone of the
human skeleton
y It is a hollow cylindrical shaft filled with bone marrow.
y Its rounded, smooth head fits into a socket in the pelvis called
the acetabulum to form the hip joint .
y The head of the femur is joined to the bone shaft by a narrow
piece of bone known as the neck of the femur.
y The lower end of the femur hinges with the tibia (shinbone) to
form the knee joint.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
4/32
Femur
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
5/32
L
iterature surveyy Previously used methods for stress analysis :
Direct Methods
Brittle coating
o First applied to the femur by Kiintscher who used a
melted colophonium as coating .
o After applying the forces in testing machine they
observed the deformation patterns formed by cracks on
the coating .
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
6/32
Photoelastic coatingso Used for a full-field determination of surface strains in
two- or three-dimensional bodies
o Applied to the human femur by Rabischong and Avri,
Leduc and Blaimont and Wagner.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
7/32
Strain gauges
o Provides a point-by-point method for the
determination of surface strains of bodies.o Due to technological problems strain gauges were
inadequate to monitor strains for long periods inliving bones
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
8/32
Indirect Methodsy These methods necessitate the construction of a model from the
actual femur, hence called indirect
Beam Theory
o Introdued by Koch to study the stress distribution in human femur.
o Simulated the femur as a two-dimensional beam.
o Only accurate for long beams of constant cross-section.
o Unknown errors are therefore created when this method is applied
to the femur.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
9/32
Photoelasticity
o Milch used a two-dimensional and homogeneous model
of the femur and obtained the isochromatic fringe patterns
when the model was subjected to forces.
o From the pattern of isochromatics he established a close
resemblance between the lines of stress and the known
trabecular arrangement of the bone
o Two dimensional models are only partially valid.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
10/32
Finite element analysis
y Brekelmans et al. simulated the femur as a two-
dimensional member consisting of a homogeneous,
isotropic elastic material.
y The loading consisted either of one concentrated load,
or of two concentrated loads, with the second load
representing muscle forces.
y In these analyses the problem is considered as a two-
dimensional one.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
11/32
Objective
o Previous studies were mostly confined to Two
Dimensional models which were not accurate enough.
o Hence our objective is to analyse the state of stress and
deformation and to predict the zone of frequent fracture in
a femur bone using 3 D model by finite element method.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
12/32
3D Stress Analysis of
Femur
y The femur is one of the most highly loaded bones of the
human body
y Shape of the femur is asymmetric and curved in all three
planes, 2 D model seems only partially valid
y A three-dimensional model has been used in this study of
stress analysis.
y Finite element stress analysis methods allow the solution of
three dimensional problems involving complex shapes.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
13/32
Problem solving steps
y Assumptions :
1) Bone is made of linear, homogenous, solid, isotropic
material with predefined elastic properties.2) Sideways force on epiphysis is negligible.
3) Distal part is flat and fixed.
4) One legged stance.
5) Two forces viz. joint reaction force and force due to
abductor muscles are only considered and forces due to
other muscle groups which are not well defined are
neglected in our study.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
14/32
3D Cad Model (SolidWorks)y 3D CAD model was developed in cad drawing software
SOLIDWORKS using real dimensions of femur
y The bone is made solid volume instead of being hollow in
real.
y Exported to simulation software ANSYS 11.0 for its stress
analysis.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
15/32
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
16/32
Stress AnalysisMaterial Parameters
y
Bone is assumed to be a linear, isotropic andhomogeneous material .
y Elastic constants and other mechanical properties .
1) Youngs modulus (E) = 17 GPa = 17*109 Pa
2) Poissons ratio () = 0.33
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
17/32
Loads on Femur
y Assumed a 70 kg person on one foot on the ground
orientation.
yThe forces taken into account are:
1) Joint reaction force on the femur head due to pelvis (R)
2) Abductor muscles force which acts at 700 from the
horizontal as shown in figure (F)
3) Weight of the body (W)
4) Normal force (N)
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
18/32
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
19/32
y Person is stationary, the horizontal and vertical
components of the forces and the total torque are all
equal to zero.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
20/32
yAfter solving these equations
F = 1.6W R = 2.4W
y The angle is
tan( ) =RH/RV
= 0.23 radian
1) Joint reaction force at 130 to the vertical, R = 2.4*70*9.8 =
1646 N
2) Abductor muscle force at 700 to the horizontal, F=1100 N
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
21/32
Finite Element stress Analysis
yAnalysis of intact femur in one legged position has
been done in ANSYS 11.0
y Imported CAD model is meshed using element
SOLID45which is triangular in shape.
y Forces are applied on the meshed bone restrained
from moving at distal part at defined positions.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
22/32
y NODE 27: on femur neck
Joint reaction force, R= 1646N
Rx
= R cos(130) = 1603.8 N
Rz = R sin(130) = -370.2 N z
Ry= R sin(30) = 86.14 N x
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
23/32
y
NODE 390 : on top of greater trochanterAbductor muscle force,F= 1100 N
Fz =Fcos(700) = 376.2 N
Fx =F
sin(700
)= -1033.66 NFy=Fsin(3
0)= 57.56 N
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
24/32
R
esults and analysisDeformation
y The maximum deformation of bone is found to be at the
point of application of joint reaction force i.e. MX point in
figure.
y As we move from femur head to the distal part, the values
of deformation (total sum) found to be decreasing linearlyas shown in figure.
y Maximum deformation = 4.63 mm at femur head
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
25/32
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
26/32
5 Variation of total deformation in femur with distance from point of application of forces5 Variation of total deformation in femur with distance from point of application of forces5 Variation of total deformation in femur with distance from point of application of forces5 Variation of total deformation in femur with distance from point of application of forces
Variation of total deformation in femur with distance from point
of application of forces
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
27/32
Von Mises Stressesy Maximum stresses were observed at upper shaft position and
femur neck where the areas are lesser as compared to other
parts of the bone. MX point in the figure is the point of
maximum stress in the femur bone.
y Lateral surface of the shaft observed the tensile stresses
whereas compressive stresses occurred at medial surface.
y Maximum stress = 8.8 MPa at upper lateral shaft.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
28/32
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
29/32
Variation of stresses with distance from point ofapplication of forces
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
30/32
Conclusiony A linear finite element analysis of the proximal femur was
performed.
y The maximum displacement magnitude occurs within the
femoral head where the hip contact force is applied.
y The maximum fracture risk in the cortex seems to be on the
upper part of the diaphysis and on the femoral neck where the
maximum stress concentration occurs.
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
31/32
Futur rky In the above study, stress analysis in human femur has been
done using 3D finite element technique.
y In the future we will be developing the mathematical model
for the femur bone to study the effects of bone geometry and
bone density on the stresses developed on the application of
the forces of varying magnitude .
-
8/8/2019 Effect of Bone Shaft Geometry in Its Bending
32/32
Thank You