諮商師性別偏見對不同性別個案...
TRANSCRIPT
-
I
-
II
The influence of counselors sex bias on case
conceptualization
Abstract
The study explored when counselors were faced with male/female clients,
whether or not they set a different standard of mental health, used different
treatments, form different conceptualization, or interpreted the client in a
different way. By means of analyzing case conceptualization questionnaires
from 18 counselors, the researcher made the following conclusions:
1. Counselors assessments of problems: Male clients career issue tended to
be considered the key issue. Female clients problems were apt to be
viewed as the self issue.
2. Male clients counselors focused on instrumental exploration, setting the
career assurance as the goal; female clients counselors concentrate on
self-improvement, taking the self-efficacy enhancement as the objective.
3. In working orientation aspect, female clients counselors are willing to
lead the clients to see their position in the mainstream frame in systematic
view.
4. Counselors expect male clients for more improvement than female clients.
5. The sex bias in case conceptualization is as follows
(1) Counselors refer to the sex-role schema as the basis of
conceptualization and strategies-froming.
(2) Male clients have restricted self-exploration in counseling sessions.
(3) Female clients career issues might not be dealt with in an aggressive
process.
key words: mental counselors, sex bias, case conceptualizaiton
-
III
01
05
05
07
14
23
29
57
60
62
63
65
68
-
IV
71
76
80
- 83
89
90
99
104
109
117
-
V
2-1 09
2-2 12
2-3 16
2-4 Loganbill Stoltenberg 30
2-5 Stevens Morris 33
2-6 199940
2-7 43
2-8 200152
2-9 54
3-1 61
3-2 62
4-1 71
4-2 74
4-3 79
4-4 80
4-5 84
2-1 10
2-2 21
3-1 66
-
1
(social justice
Constantine, Hage, Kindaichi & Bryant, 2007
(stereotype)
-
2
(gender bias) 1970
20012002Danzinger & Welfel, 2000;
Seem & Johnson, 1998
(social construction)
Seem & Johnson, 1998
Gilbert, 1980; Worell Remer, 1992; Gilbert & Scher,
1999/2008
Danzinger Welfel2000
-
3
Cook, Warnke, & Dupuy, 1993
1997
(double binds
2004
Helms Cook
1999
2004Danzinger Welfel2000
Yalom
1995/2001, p105
-
4
2001
Constantine 2007
Abreu2000
-
5
1.
2.
3.
(sex bias)
(counselor)
-
6
(case conceptualization)
-
7
(sex)
/Bem, 1993;
Gilbert & Scher, 1999/2008---
(sex)
---(gender)
Gilbert & Scher, 1999/2008
Sherif1982
Brannon, 2008
-
8
Deaux & LaFrance, 1998 Gilbert & Scher,
1999/2008
Burr, 1998/2002
(gender socialization)
1999Keller
1992
Gilbert & Scher,
1999/2008
Gilbert & Scher, 1999/2008
Scher, 1994 Gilbert & Scher,
1999/2008
-
9
Gilbert Scher1999/2008
2-1
2-1
43~47Gilbert & Scher
1999/2008
Gilbert & Scher,
1999/2008
-
10
(gender
differentiation)
Pogrebin1983
Maccoby Jacklin1974
2-1
2-1
-
11
1999
(instrumental traits)
(expressive traits)
2005Brannon2008
true
womanhood---
pietypuritysubmissivenessdomesticity
masculinity
2-2
-
12
2-2
piety
purity
submissiveness
domesticity
No sissy stuff
The big wheel
The sturdy oak
Give em hell
Gender: Psychological Perspectives (5th ed.; p.50), by L.
Brannon, 2008, New York, Pearson Education.
1991
2003
Paul1998Mahzarin Banaji
Brannon, 2008
-
13
Weber1995
Aronson
Aronson, Wilson & Akert,
1995
Sears, Freedman & Peplau, 1987
2004
Tajfel, Flament, Billig, & Bundy; 2003
2004
Miller1980
Fear-Fenn1986
2003
-
14
Weisstein1970
Brannon, 2008; Enns, 2000
Freud
Freud
(castration anxiety)
Papalia & Olds, 1992/1994
2006Freud
Papalia & Olds, 1992/1994
Freud
Brannon, 2008
2003
-
15
1988222-223 2003
2003
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
2003
behaviourism
psychometrics
(intrapsychic)
Sherif, 1979; Gilbert, 1994;
Hare-Mustin Marecek, 1990; Gilbert & Scher, 1999/2008
-
16
Brannon2008
2-3
2-3
Gender: Psychological Perspectives (5th ed.; p.7), by L. Brannon,
2008, New York, Pearson Education
.
MarecekHare-Mustin1987
Gilbert & Scher,
1999/200860
Brannon, 2008
1970Broverman,
Broverman, Clarkson, Rosenkrantz & Vogel, 1970; 2001
-
17
Gilbert & Scher,
1999/2008Weisstein1968
Psychology Constructs the Female
Chesler
1972(Women and Madness)
Chesler
BrovermanBrovermanClarksonRosenkrantzVogel1970
(Sex-Role Stereotypes
and Clinical Judgments of Mental Health)Broverman
Danzinger & Welfel, 2000Broverman
2001
2002Danzinger & Welfel, 2000; Seem & Johnson, 1998
Sesan, 1983
19991975 (American Psychological Association,
APA)
Betz &
Fitzgerald,1993; Sesan,1988
-
18
Popes1990
1988
Betz & Fitzgerald,1993
(sex violence)
Seem & Johnson, 1998
GilbertScher1999/2008
1.
2.
3.
4.
-
19
Constantine 2007
Gilbert
Scher(1999/2008)
Gilbert Scher1999/2008
1.
2.
3.
Betz & Fitzgerald,1993; Fitzgerald & Nutt,1986;
Gilbert & Scher, 1999/2008; Hare-Mustin, 1983; Sesan,1988
1.
2.
-
20
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Deaux Major 1987
Gilbert & Scher, 1999/2008
-
21
(perceiver)(target)
2-2Deaux Major
2-2
Gilbert & Scher(1999/2008) 225
-
22
Falvey,
Bray & Hebert, 2005
Cook Warnke Dupuy1993
2006
(out group)
Helms Cook1999
2004
1997
Morrow
2006
1999Cook, Warnke & Dupuy, 1993; Knudson-Martin & Laughlin,
-
23
2005; Seem & Johnson, 1998; Sesan, 1988
Seem Johnson1998
:
2001
Danzinger
& Welfel, 200020011999
Broverman 1970
Danzinger &
-
24
Welfel, 2000
Cook, Warnke
& Dupuy,1993
1997
(double binds)
Knudson-Martin Laughlin
2005
2004 Nolen-Hoeksema1998
-
25
Enns, 2000
Bepko, 1989;
Perlick, & Silverstein,1994; Meth, 1990; Pearson, 1993;
Knudson-Martin & Laughlin, 20052008
(gender role strain)Pleck1995
2010
1.
2.
3.
(Frank & Rothblum, 1983; Kaplan, 1983; Enns,
2000
(1995)
-
26
Seem
Johnson1998 210
Seem Johnson
Seem Johnson
Sesan1988 192
Werner-Wilson, Zimmerman & Price, 1999
2001
Sesan
-
27
APA1975
Sesan
Sesan 1988
1998
Fromm1967
Fromm, 1967:201
20052004
1998
-
28
Danzinger Welfel2000 147
Roberson Fitzgerald1990 47
Cook, et al.,1993
1997
1999
2001 58
-
29
Pengilly1988 1954 Pepinsky
Pepinsky 1999
Pepinsky& Pepinsky1954
Falvey, Bray & Hebert,
2005
LoganbillStoltenberg1983
-
30
2-4
2-4 LoganbillStoltenberg
The case conceptualization formatA training device
for practicum. By Loganbill, C., & Stoltenberg, C, 1983,
Counselor Education and Supervision, 223, 235-241.
Pengilly1988
1.
2.
3.
a. b c. d.
e.f. g.
a. b.c.
d. e.
a. b.c.
d. e. f.
.
-
31
/
1999
Benard1979
1.2.
3.4.5.
1.
2.3.
4.
5.1.
2.3.
4.5.6.7.
1999
CormierCormier1991
CormierCormier
Cormier Cormier
assessment
-
32
Stevens Morris1995 Loganbill Stoltenberg
Biggss1988
2-5
-
33
2-5 Stevens Morris
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
A format for case Conceptualization. by StevensM.J.&
MorrisS.J., 1995, Counselor Education and Supervision3582-94.
-
34
Stevens Morris
1999 Stevens Morris
Holloway1995
1999 Holloway
Berman1997
what the client is like
why the client is like this
-
35
Meier1999
WillsSanders1997
Constantine2001
Sperry2005
WHAT
WHY
HOW
Sperry2005
1.
-
36
2.
3.
Sperry2005
(pattern analysis)
case
conceptualization
2003199919941996
1995(case conceptualization)
(conceptualization)
1991
1994
Loganbill Stoltenberg, 1983Cormier& Cormier, 1991
Abbey, Hunt, & Weister, 1985
-
37
1.
2.3.
4.
1995Bernard, 1981;
Biggs,1988; Lanning, 1996; Morran, Kurpius, Brack & Brack, 1995
1.
2.
3.
4.
1995
1.
2.3.
4.5.
-
38
6.7.
1996
1.
2.
3.
1996Bernard
1.2.
3.4.5.
6.
7.
Bernard
1999
-
39
1999
1.2.3.
4.5.6.
7.8.9.
2-6
-
40
2-6 1999
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1999
-
41
2000
2003
2002
2009
-
42
2-7
-
43
2-7 Loganbill
Stoltenberg
1983
Stevens
Morris
Bernard Cormier
Cormier
1991
1995
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-
44
2-7
Loganbill Stoltenberg1983 Cormier Cormier1991
Bernard19791995
Stevens Morris19951999
Berman, 1997
(treatment planning)Falvey, Bray &
Hebert, 2005
-
45
2001
Pengilly1988
2001Loganbill
Stoltenberg1983
Bernard1979
19891999Murdock1991
1995
Sperry
2005)
-
46
Sperry2005
Falvey,2001
Sperry2005)
Berman1997
Cormier Cormier1991
Murdock1991
Murdock
Murdock
-
47
1. (core motivation)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Sansburay1982
1
2
3
-
48
Hieber Noor 1988 Hieber Johnson
1994
Gentry1995
1998 49
1999
1999Hill
1981
-
49
Sansbury1982
MartinMartinMeyer Slemon1986
MartinSlemon Hallberg
1989 11 12
Cummings, Hallberg Martin 1990 1989
Myfield, Kardash Kivligham1999 4 5
Stoltenberg1988
-
50
199920012001
Stoltenberg
1991
1992
284
--
1994
between the counseling sessions
(in the counseling
sessions)
1997
1999
-
51
1999Borders Fong
1994
Bernard1979
Stoltenberg1988
1995
1999
1992
1999
2001
1.
2.
3.
4.
2-8
-
52
2-8 2001
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
2001
192, 21-24
Bernard1979
1999Anderson1982,1985
1999
1991 Martin1984
Martin 1989 Martin1990
1999
1991
-
53
12
3
FalveyBray Hebert2005
Constantine2001
2-9
-
54
2-9
(Constantine & Ladany, 2000)
2001
Constantine, 2001; Constantine &
Ladany, 2000 ;Ladany, Inman & Constantine, 1997
Constantine(2001 120
-
55
Constantine
22
1.
2.
FalveyBray Hebert2005
(thinking aloud process-tracing strategy)
Falvey
1994(Clinical Treatment Planning
SimulationCTPS)CTPS 33
(Delphi technique)
Falvey CTPS
Falvey
Novak,&
Gowin, 198420022004
2009
-
56
Loganbill,& Stoltenberg,1983; Cormier, & Cormier, 1991;
Stevens,& Morris, 1995Egan1994
Berman,
1997 Constantine2001
-
57
HepperKivlighor Wampold1992/1996
(methodological diversity)
2001
(analogue
research)
-
58
20082003
Patton, 2001(Critical
Theory)
self-reflection
1996
(Frankfurt School)
1920
Morrow, 1994Habermas
2008
(critique
(science
1996Habermas KantHegel Marx
Husserl
Freud
20052000
-
59
Neuman,
1997/2008
Comstock 1982
2008
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
-
60
(consensus qualitative research, CQR) Hill
Thompson Williams 1997 (grounded theory)
(comprehensive process analysis)
(phenomenological approach)(feminist theories)
Wang, 2008
2000
Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997
(Auditor)
-
61
(consensus)
3-1
3-1
11
7
3-2
-
62
5.8
3-2
01 01 5 31-40 **
02 02 0.5 25-30
03 03 2.5 31-40
04 04 13 41-50
05 05 5 31-40 **
06 06 10 31-40
07 07 4 31-40
08 08 1 31-40 **
09 09 2 25-30 **
10 10 3 31-40 **
11 11 8 31-40
12 01 3 31-40 **
13 02 1 25-30
14 03 1 25-30 **
15 04 * 41-50
16 05 25 41-50
17 06 10 31-40
18 07 4 31-40 **
***
-
63
Tesch1990
2004
-
64
Falvey 2005
-
65
01 11
AB
C
0102
09-1C-01
-
66
Consensus
Qualitative Research, CQRHill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997; Hill,
Knox, Thompson, Williams, Hess, & Ladany, 2005; Wang, 2008CQR
CQR Hill, et al.,
1997 Hill
3-1
3-1
1.
-
67
(domain)
2.
(abstract)
(domain)
(abstract)
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
-
68
Hill 2005
(general)
(typical)(variant)
10.
11.
Hill 2005
Patton1990/1995credibility issue
Strauss & Corbin,
1990/1997
-
69
Patton1990/1995
Mcleod, 2003/2006
(triangulation)
-
70
-
71
4-1
4-1
/
4 3 3 1
1 1 3 3
CL
03-1B-02
-
72
10-1B-01
05-1B-02
07-1B-02
11-1B-01
CL
07-1B-01 07-1C-01
01-1B-01
08-1B-01
CL 09-1B-02
CL
02-1B-01
-
73
(ego
function) 05-1B-01
01-1B-01
01-1B-02
05-1c-02
06-1B-03
-
74
4-2
4-2
/
5 3 2 1 4 1 0 0 0 0
3 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 1
01-1C-02
02-1C-01
07-1C-02
02-1C-02
07-1C-01
-
75
09-1C-01
06-1C-01
-
76
Hill 2005
CL 01-2-01
CL
CL
03-2-01
10-2-01
-
77
CL
02-2-02
CL
CL
04-2-02
08-2-03
CL
CL
05-2-05
CL CL
CL CL
07-2-04
06-2-03 06-2-05
-
78
01-2-02
02-2-01 02-2-02
03-2-01 03-2-02 03-2-03
A a
b
c
B a BDIBAI
b
c 07-2-01
CL
04-2-01
-
79
4-3
4-3
4 1 0 0 6
0 1 2 1 3
-
80
4-4
4-4
6 4 0 1 5 4 1 2 3 1 3 2 1
3 2 1 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
CL 03-3-01
C L
09-3-01
10-3-01
-
81
CL 03-3-01
07-3-01
01-3-03
03-3-03
07-3-04
08-3-01
06-3-01
11-3-03
01-3-02
true self 05-3-01
-
82
06-3-01
07-3-02
01-3-02
03-3-02
04-3-01
07-3-02
CL 03-3-01
02-3-01
06-3-02
-
83
01-3-06
04-3-02
CL 11-3-01
06-3-02 06-3-03
4-5
-
84
4-5
(2005Brannon, 2008
Betz & Fitzgerald,1993; Fitzgerald & Nutt,1986; Gilbert
& Scher, 1999/2008; Hare-Mustin, 1983; Sesan,1988
2010
-
85
(life-span)Hernandez Morales1999
(multicultural
competencies)HargroveCreaghKelly2003
(1)
(2)
(3)
Lynch
Kilmartin1999
2010
Roberson Fitzgerald1990
-
86
Levant1998(male
alexithymia)2010
2010
(gendered being)
2007
GilbertWalker2001
-
87
1.
2.
3.
2010
1.
2.
(non-deficit)
3.
4.
(empowerment)
5.
2005
-
88
Deaux
Major1987
(2007)
Danzinger Welfel2000
-
89
1.
-
90
2.
3.
4.
2006
-
91
2007/07/03
2009/01/11
-
92
2009/01/17
8500
UNDP
119100 107100
Kathryn Bigelow
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100308/19/?http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100309/4/? -
93
Kathryn Bigelow
2010
2010/3/9
2010/03/09
2010/06/11
-
94
-
95
1.
Carter1992
2007
2.
-
96
3.
2007
1.
2.
-
97
1.
2.
3.
-
98
-
99
20012007/5/10
http://www.guidance.org.tw/ethic.shtml
2001Yalom, I. D (1995)
1991
2010
46(1)32-43
2005
492008/12/09 http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/49/49-56.htm
2000
36(47-16
2000Neuman, W. L.1997
19911213-20
1995Patton, M. Q.1990
2008Gilbert, L. A., & Scher, M.1999
2004
2000
1995Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Akert, R. M.(1994)
-
100
2003
2010
290 42-45
2003
1990
1999I-D-E
(2005)41(3)
11-17
2006
2004
2006244
54-57
1997Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J.1990
2009
2008 18 -
2005
13(4)411-413
1994
1991
-
101
1998
19982007/6/20 http://140.111.34.46/dict/
1996
2003:
2073-104
2003McLeod, J.2006
199531(2)37-42
199834(2)31-34
2001
101-39
2004
255-274
2001a
193, 20-26
2001b
192, 21-24
2003
1999
2001
221-32
-
102
2001
22193-230
1996
1994Papalia, D. E., & Olds, S. W.1992
1999/
2002Vivien Bur
1996
2004
40215-26
1999
2005
2006
20201230
199733(1)26-31
1995
NSC 84-2413-H-018-099
(1996)Heppner, P. P., Kivlighan, D. M. & Wampold, B. E.1992
1997
2007/5/11 http://taiwan.yam.org.tw/nwc/nwc2/psycho.htm
20021345-72
20034
-
103
1999
19953
1-40
2003
2004
404642-651
1991, 13, 10-12
1995, 31(2),
39-46
2007
43(4)4251
2004
1999
pp.203-223
2003
-
104
American Psychological Association. (2003). Guidelines on multicultural education,
training, research, practice, and organizational change for psychologists.
American Psychologist, 58, 377-402.
Berman, P. S. (1997). Case conceptualization and treatment planning: Exercises for
integrating theory with clinical practice. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
Betz, N. E., & Fitzgerald. L. F. (1993). Individuality and diversity: Theory and
research in counseling psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 343-381.
Borders, L. D., & Fong, M. L. (1989). Ego development and counseling ability during
training. Counselor Education and Supervision, 29, 71-83.
Brannon, L., (2008). Gender: Psychological perspectives. (5th ed.). New York:
Pearson Education.
Buczek, T. (1986). A promising of sex bias: The incidental memory task. Psychology
of Women Quarterly. 10, 127-140.
Carter, B. (1992). Stonewalling feminism. Family Therapy Networker,16, 64-69.
Constantine, M. G. (2001) Independent and interdependent self-construals as
predictors of multicultural case conceptualization ability in counsellor trainees.
Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 14, 33-42.
Constantine, M. G., & Ladany, N. (2000). Self-report multicultural counseling
competence scales: Their relation to social desirability attitudes and multicultural
case conceptualization ability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 55-164.
Constantine, M., Hage, S., Kindaichi, M., Bryant, R. M., & Mclean, R. (2007). Social
justice and multicultural issues: Implications for the practice and training of
counseling psychologists. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85, 24-29.
-
105
Cook, E.P., Warnke, M., & Dupuy, P. (1993). Gender bias and the DSM-III-R.
Counselor Education and Supervision, 32, 311-322.
Cormier, W. H., & Cormier, L.(1991). Interviewing strategies for helpers(3rd ed.).
Californ ks/Cole.
Cummings, A. L., Hallberg, E. T., Martin, J., Slemon, A.,& Hiebert, B.(1990)
Implications of counselor conceptualizations for counselor education. Counselor
Education and Supervision, 30, 120-134.
Danzinger, P. R., & Welfel, E. R. (2000). Age, gender and health bias in counselors:
An empirical analysis. Journal of Mental Health counseling, 22(2), 135-149.
Egan, G. (1994) The Skilled Helper: A problem-management approach to helping (5th
Ed.). Belmont, Ca: Brooks Cole
Enns, C. Z., (2000). Gender issues in counseling. In Brown S. D. & Lent R. W. (Eds.),
Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd
ed.). New York: Wiley.
Falvey, J. E., Bray, T. E., & Hebert, D. J. (2005). Case conceptualization and
treatment planning: Investigation of problem-solving and clinical judgment.
Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27(4).348-372.
Gentry, G. R. (1995). Conceptualization of therapeutic change processes in the early
stages of counseling training. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A:
Humanities & Social Science. 559-A, 2771.
Guanipa, C., & Woolley, S. (2000). Gender biases in therapists conceptualization of a
couples problem. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(2), 181-191.
Hargrove, B.K., Creagh, M.G., & Kelly, D.B. (2003). Multicultural competencies in
career counseling. In D.B. Pope-Davis, H.L.K. Coleman, W.M. Liu, & R.
Torporek (Eds.), Handbook of multicultural competencies in counseling and
psychology (pp. 392-405). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hiebert, B., & Johnson, P.1994. Changes in counseling skill and cognitive
-
106
structures of counselor trainees.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED
375 335
Hiebert, B., & Noort, E. D.(1988).Changes in the conceptualization and skills of
counseling practicum students: A pilot investigation. ERIC Document
Reproduction Service No. ED 296268
Hill, C. E., Charles, D., & Reed, K. G. (1981). A longitudinal analysis of changes in
counseling skills during doctoral training in counseling psychology. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 28, 428-436.
Hill, C. E., Knox, S., Thompson, B. J., Williams, E. N., Hess, S. A., & Ladany, N.
(2005). Consensual qualitative research : An update. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 52(2), 196-205.
Hill, C. E., Thompson, B. J., & Williams, E. N. (1997). A guide to conducting
consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 17-57.
Holloway, E. L. (1995). Clinical supervision:A system approach. LondonSage
Publication.
Knudson-Martin, C. & Laughlin, M. (2005). Gender and sexual orientation in marital
and family therapy: A post-gender approach. Family Relations, 54, 101-115.
Kocet, M. (2006). Ethical challenges in a complex world: Highlights of the 2005 ACA
code of ethics. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84(2), 228-253.
Ladany, N., Inman, A. G., Constantine, M. G., & Hofheinz, E. W. (1997). Supervisee
multicultural case conceptualization ability and self-reported multicultural
competence as functions of supervisee racial identity and supervisor focus.
Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 284-293.
Loganbill, C., & Stoltenberg, C.1983. The case conceptualization formatA training
-
107
device for practicum. Counselor Education and Supervision, 22(3), 235-241.
Lynch, J., & Kilmartin, C. (1999). The pain behind the mask: Overcoming masculine
depression. New York :The Haworth Press.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. CA:
Stanford University Press.
Martin, J. M, Martin, W., Meyer, M., & Slemon, A. G.(1986). Empirical investigation
of the cognitive mediation paradigm for research on counseling. Journal of
Counseling and Development, 33, 115-123.
Martin, J.SlemonA. G.HiebertB. HallbergE. T.& CummingsA.
L.(1989).Conceptualizations of novice and experience counselors. Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 36, 393-396.
Mayfield, W. A., Kardash, C.M., & Kivligham, D. M. (1999) Difference in
experiencedand novice counselors knowledge structures about clients :
Implications for case conceptualization. Journal of counseling psychology,
46(40), 504-514 .
Morrow, R. A., & Brown, D. D. (1994). Critical theory and methodology. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Murdock, N. L.(1991). In the field -Case conceptualization:Applying theory to
individuals . Counselor Education and Supervision, 30(4), 355-365.
Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learing how to learn. Cambridge University
Press.
Pepinsky, H. B., & Pepinsky, P. N. (1954). Counseling theory and practice. New
York:Ronald.
Pogrebin, L. C. (1983). Familiy policies. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sansbury, D. L., (1982). Developmental supervision from a skills perspective. The
Counseling Psychologist, 10(1), 53.
-
108
Seem, S.R., & Johnson, E. (1998). Gender bias among counseling trainees: A study of
case conceptualization. Counselor Education and Supervision, 37, 257-268.
Sesan, R. (1988).Sex bias and sex-role stereotyping in psychotherapy with
women: Survey Results. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice,25,
107-116.
Sperry, L. (2005). Case conceptualizations: The missing link between theory and
practice. The Family Journal: Counseling Couples and Families, 13, 71-76.
Stevens, M. J.& MorrisS. J.(1995). A format for case Conceptualization. Counselor
Education and Supervision, 35, 82-94.
Taylor, M. (1994). Gender and Power in Counselling and Supervision. British Journal of
Guidance & Counselling, 22(3), p319-326
Wang, Y. W. (2008). Qualitative research. In Heppner, P. P., Wampold B. E. &
Kivlighan, D. M. Research design in counseling (3rd ed., pp. 256-295). New
York: Brooks .
Wills, F., & Sanders, D. (1997). Cognitive therapy: Transforming the image.
London:Sage.
-
109
(A)
30
-
110
-
111
1. A
B
C
2.
-
112
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.25~30 31~40 41~50 51~60 61
4.
5.
-
113
(B)
30
-
114
-
115
1. A
B
C
2.
-
116
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.25~30 31~40 41~50 51~60 61
4.
5.
-
117
0930-