eee 1106 014 low voltage highly linear cmos up conversion mixer

Upload: j-jesus-villanueva-garcia

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 EEE 1106 014 Low Voltage Highly Linear CMOS Up Conversion Mixer

    1/5

    Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering Vol. 2, No. 6, June 2011

    176

    AbstractA low voltage highly linear CMOS single IF based upconversion mixer is presented which converts the input baseband

    signal to an output of 1.7-1.8 GHz RF signal. Low voltage

    architectures based on the switched mode transconductors and

    folded cascode structures are used in the IF and RF mixers that help

    to achieve low voltage and low power operation. A harmonic

    suppression technique is used in the IF mixer and a current steering

    approach is utilized to transfer the intermediate signal between IF

    and RF stages in order to increase the overall linearity. Full

    transistor level simulation results for an AMS 0.35 m CMOS

    process reveal high linearity of the proposed mixer after a FOM-based comparison at 1 V supply voltage while consumes only 5.35

    mW power. The proposed mixer has reached to a maximum

    conversion gain of 4.5 dB at the desired output frequency and its

    linearity performance indexes consisting of IIP3, P-1dB, and IIP2

    are 10.51, -1.05, and 85.6 dBm, respectively.

    Keywords Highly linear, up conversion mixer, low power,

    low voltage, harmonic suppression.

    I.INTRODUCTIONIn recent years, demand for single chip low power and low

    voltage transceivers has been increased, tremendously. Many

    types of portable communication devices like cellular phones

    need high performance and low cost RF circuits and hence,

    single chip integrating and low power consuming solutions

    draw great attention due to decrease the cost and prolong the

    battery life.

    A conventional Gilbert mixer is the most popular circuit and

    widely used in transceivers due to its good port to port

    isolation. However, it is not suitable for low voltage

    application, as it requires a stack of three levels of transistors

    working in saturation region and a load stage, and hence when

    the mixer reduces its power supply voltage, its performance

    including conversion gain and especially linearity will be

    degraded. On the other hand in such a mixer, the localoscillator (LO) switches are hard driven to improve linearity

    and optimize noise figure. As a result, the mixing process

    produces several unwanted harmonics that must be filtered,

    which degrades the single chip integration.

    Alireza Saberkari is with the Department of Electrical Engineering,

    University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. (e-mail: [email protected]).

    Shahriar B. Shokouhi is with the Department of Electrical Engineering,

    Iran University of Science & Technology, Tehran, Iran.

    By using more LO phases and summing them with the right

    weighting, it is possible to approximate a sinusoidal switching

    that contains less unwanted harmonics [1]-[4]. But the sub-

    mixers used in [1] are based on the conventional Gilbert cell

    that need high power supply and high LO power to drive the

    LO switching gates in order to increase the linearity and

    harmonic suppression. Also total capacitive loading at the LO

    ports of the sub-mixers are not equal due to the scaling of

    switching transistors in one of the sub-mixers that can lead to

    phase error. In this paper a low voltage highly linear CMOS

    single IF based up conversion mixer exhibiting highperformance after a FOM-based comparison is presented.

    II. PROPOSED MIXER STRUCTURE AND DESIGN CRITERIAThe transistor level schematic of the proposed mixer is

    shown in Fig. 1. The baseband-to-IF stage is a harmonic

    suppression mixer and consists of three switched mode

    transconductor sub-mixers [5]. The sources of transconductor

    transistors (M1-M12) are switched from on-chip inverters

    (M13-M36) which work as LO buffers and provide square-

    wave LO signals. Three LO signals with phases of o45 , 0,

    and o45+ are used to drive the inverters as shown in Fig. 2.

    The transconductance stages of these three sub-mixers are

    weighted as 1: 2 :1 and switched according to the LO phases

    in order to suppress the 3rd

    and 5th

    order harmonics. The

    current output of each transconductance stage is multiplied and

    then added together and finally injected into the active load.

    This structure helps to reduce the needed LO power to drive

    the switching inverters and compatible with low supply

    voltage. Since the switching transistors of inverters have the

    same aspect ratio, there is no unbalancing at the LO ports that

    leads to phase error reduction. Also, generated noise by the

    LO switches is in the form of common mode noise and

    therefore it will be rejected at the differential output and the

    noise level can be decreased. Two LO buffers for each sub-

    mixer with gradual increase in size help to achieve lower

    power dissipation and loading effect on the LO generators by

    the switches. It also increases the overall linearity by

    decreasing the on-resistance of the switches.

    Low Voltage Highly Linear CMOS Up

    Conversion Mixer

    Alireza Saberkari and Shahriar B. Shokouhi

  • 7/28/2019 EEE 1106 014 Low Voltage Highly Linear CMOS Up Conversion Mixer

    2/5

    Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering Vol. 2, No. 6, June 2011

    177

    Fig. 1. Schematic of the proposed mixer.

    Fig. 2. Three LO signals used to generate the effective LO.

    The IF-to-RF stage is performed using the structure of

    folded cascode. Transistors M43-M46 form the LO switching

    stage and M47 and M48 supply dc biasing current of the

    switching pairs. To make M43-M46 as ideal switches, the

    transistors are biased in the saturation region close to the

    triode one. The inductive loads of the mixer L 1 resonate at the

    desired output frequency with the parasitic capacitances at the

    output node and hence reject the image signals. They also

    improve the noise level of the mixer due to their lower noise

    contribution. The inductor L 2 has been used to tune out the

    parasitic tail capacitance between the transconductance and

    LO switching stages and increase the mixer linearity [6]. The

    use of folded cascode helps to split the supply voltage and

    provides low voltage operation. Also, it is possible to separate

  • 7/28/2019 EEE 1106 014 Low Voltage Highly Linear CMOS Up Conversion Mixer

    3/5

    Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering Vol. 2, No. 6, June 2011

    178

    the dc biasing current of transconductance and LO switching

    stages. As a result, by limiting the dc current of switching

    pairs, their noise level can be greatly decreased. In addition, by

    injecting more dc current into the transconductance stage, the

    conversion gain and dc current mismatch of input differential

    transistors and hence the IIP2 can be improved.

    If the LO switching stage of a mixer is assumed ideal,

    overall linearity performance is dominated by its

    transconductance stage. A current steering approach based oncurrent mirror [7] has been used in the proposed mixer instead

    of the conventional voltage mode method in order to transfer

    the intermediate signal between IF and RF stages to increase

    the linearity. The diode connected transistors of baseband-to-

    IF stage (M37, M38) which act as active loads, with the input

    stage transistors of IF-to-RF stage (M41, M42) form a current

    mirror and steer the current mode intermediate signal. By

    choosing the appropriate scaling factor for these transistors, it

    is possible to set the gain of mixer. One issue about the current

    mirror is that its operating frequency is reversely proportional

    to its scaling factor and hence it is not possible to increase the

    scaling factor at RF frequency. But in this case, as the currentmirror works at IF frequency, it is not a bottleneck. Another

    issue is that if the bias current of the first stage of mixer is

    amplified by the current mirror, noise level of the switches in

    the second stage and also the power consumption will be

    increased. So, transistors M39 and M40 are used to bypass the

    bias current of the first stage.

    The overall conversion gain of the mixer is as follow:

    LmCG RNGA 2

    4

    = (1)

    where N is the scaling factor of the current mirror, LR is the

    output load resistance, and mG is the total effectivetransconductance of the baseband-to-IF stage which is equal to

    sum of the effective transconductance of three sub-mixers.

    We assume that the three LO signals with phases of o45 ,

    0, and o45+ used in the IF stage have frequency of IFLO,

    and transient switching time of sw , like Fig. 3. According to

    the Fourier series, the effective transconductance of each sub-

    mixer and the total mG can be written as:

    =

    =

    1

    ,,2

    ,

    00

    )cos()]2

    sin()2

    [sin(1*

    8)(

    k

    IFLOswIFLO

    swIFLO

    meff

    tkkkk

    gtg

    (2)

    )8

    (2

    1)(

    ,01

    IFLOeffeff

    Ttgtg = (3)

    )8

    (2

    1)(

    ,02

    IFLOeffeff

    Ttgtg += (4)

    Fig. 3. LO signal with rise and fall time of sw .

    where IFLOT , is the period of LO signals and 0mg is the

    maximum range of each transconductance stage.

    The total effective transconductance of the baseband-to-IF

    stage, mG , which is equal to sum of the effective

    transconductance of three sub-mixers, is as follows;

    )()()( 210 tgtgtgG effeffeffm ++= (5)

    ...]7cos)2

    7sin(

    49

    1cos)

    2

    1[sin(

    16,,,,

    ,

    0+= tt

    gIFLOswIFLOIFLOswIFLO

    swIFLO

    m

    As can be seen, the 7th

    order harmonic is the main unwanted

    one in mG and hence at the output of mixer. Substituting (5) in(1), the conversion gain due to the main harmonic is equal to:

    ))sin(

    (32

    ,

    ,

    3

    0

    swIFLO

    swIFLOLmCG

    f

    fRNgA

    = (6)

    III. CIRCUIT CHARACTERIZATIONTo verify the discussion, the proposed mixer is simulated by

    Cadence in AMS 0.35 m CMOS process at 1 V supply

    voltage and the results have been compared with the most

    recently works. The input baseband signal is up converted to

    the 1.7-1.8 GHz RF signal and the chosen IF frequency is 300-

    400 MHz according to the DCS1800 standard.

    As shown in Fig. 4, the proposed mixer has a maximum

    conversion gain of 4.5 dB at the desired output frequency.

    Whereas power amplifiers in transmitters are responsible for

    increasing the signal gain and power, the measured conversion

    gain is suitable for the up conversion mixer in order to have a

    trade off between conversion gain and linearity.

    For P-1dB and IIP3 measurement, two baseband tones with

    frequency spacing of 100 KHz are applied. The IIP3 and P-

    1dB are 10.51 and -1.05 dBm, respectively as shown in Fig. 5.

    In addition, the mixer has reached to a suitable IIP2 of 85.6

    dBm.

    Table I provides comparison between performance of the

    proposed mixer and the most recently published works [6],[8]-[10]. A figure of merit is adopted here as written in Eq. (7),

    to compare the linearity of different mixers by evaluating the

    effect of the input third order intercept point IIP3 to the dc

    power dissipation.

    FOM=10log(IIP 3 (mW)/P dc (mW)) (7)

  • 7/28/2019 EEE 1106 014 Low Voltage Highly Linear CMOS Up Conversion Mixer

    4/5

    Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering Vol. 2, No. 6, June 2011

    179

    Fig. 4. Conversion gain of the mixer versus frequency. Fig. 5. IIP3 and 1-dB compression point of the mixer.

    TABLE I

    PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN AND RECENTLY PUBLISHED WORKS.

    Reference [10] [9] [8] [6] This work

    Technology (m) 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.35

    Supply Voltage (V) 1 1 1.8 1 1

    Frequency (GHz) 5.2 2.4 2.4 3-5 1.7-1.8

    Power Dissipation (mW) 3.8 3.2 4.25 4.22 5.35

    Conversion Gain (dB) 4.5 11.9 19 5.8 4.5

    IIP3 (dBm) -6 -3 -9 -1.31 10.51

    P-1dB (dBm) -16 -15 N.A. -12 -1.05

    Noise Figure (dB) 13 13.9 11 9.3 10

    FOM -11.8 -8.05 -15.28 -7.56 3.23

    A higher FOM implies better linearity for mixer. In the

    proposed mixer, linearity and power dissipation are improved

    by using the harmonic suppression, current steering approach

    and also low voltage structures and as shown in Table I, FOM

    of the proposed mixer is higher than other reported mixers

    while consumes only 5.35 mW power.

    IV. CONCLUSIONIn this paper, a low voltage highly linear CMOS single IF

    based up conversion mixer has been presented that convertsthe input baseband signal to an output of 1.7-1.8 GHz RF one.

    Low voltage structures and harmonic suppression technique

    were used in the IF and RF stages, and also a current steering

    approach was utilized to transfer the intermediate signal

    between IF and RF stages instead of the conventional voltage

    mode in order to increase the overall linearity. The proposed

    mixer was designed and characterized in AMS 0.35 m

    CMOS process at 1 V supply voltage and the results indicated

    high linearity of the proposed mixer after a FOM-based

    comparison and the overall cell consumes 5.35 mW power.

    The proposed mixer has reached to a maximum conversion

    gain of 4.5 dB at the desired output frequency and its linearity

    performance indexes including IIP3, P-1dB, and IIP2 are

    10.51, -1.05, and 85.6 dBm, respectively.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENT

    The authors would like to thank the Universitat Politcnica

    de Catalunya and specially thank Associate Professor E.

    Alarcn for his technical support.

    REFERENCES

    [1] J. A. Weldon, R. S. Narayanaswami, J. C. Rudell, L. Lin, M.

    Otsuka, S. Dedieu, L. Tee, K. C. Tsai, C. W. Lee, and P. R.

    Gray, A 1.75 GHz Highly Integrated Narrow-Band CMOS

    Transmitter with Harmonic-Rejection Mixers, IEEE J. Solid-

    State Circuits, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2003-2015, Dec. 2001.

    [2] N. A. Moseley, E. A. M. Klumperink, and B. Nauta,Experimental Verification of a Harmonic-RejectionMixing Concept Using Blind Interference Canceling,

  • 7/28/2019 EEE 1106 014 Low Voltage Highly Linear CMOS Up Conversion Mixer

    5/5

    Canadian Journal on Electrical and Electronics Engineering Vol. 2, No. 6, June 2011

    180

    Proc. European Conf. Wireless Technology, Oct. 2008,pp. 210-213.

    [3] N. A. Moseley, E. A. M. Klumperink, and B. Nauta, ATwo-Stage Approach to Harmonic Rejection MixingUsing Blind Interference Cancellation, IEEE Trans.Circuits Syst. II, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 966-970, Oct. 2008.

    [4] N. A. Moseley, Z. Ru, E. A. M. Klumperink, and B.Nauta, A 400-to-900 MHz Receiver with Dual-DomainHarmonic Rejection Exploiting Adaptive Interference

    Cancellation, Proc. IEEE Int. Solid-State Circuits Conf.(ISSCC09), Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 2009, pp. 232-233.

    [5] E. A. M. Klumperink, S. M. Louwsma, G. J. M. Wienk, and B.

    Nauta, A CMOS Switched Transconductor Mixer, IEEE J.

    Solid-State Circuits, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1231-1240, Aug. 2004.

    [6] P. Renjing, Y. K. Seng, and Z. Yuanjin, A Low-Voltage Low-

    Power High Linear and Wide-Band Mixer, Proc. IEEE Int.

    Symp. Integrated Circuits (ISIC07), Sept. 2007, pp. 341-344.

    [7] K. B. Ashby and R. Pa, Mixer with Current Mirror Load, U.S.

    Patent 6029060, Feb. 2000.

    [8] Kwon and K. Lee, An Integrated Low Power Highly Linear 2.4

    GHz CMOS Receiver Front-End Based on Current

    Amplification and Mixing, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.

    Lett, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 36-38, Jan. 2005.

    [9] V. Vidojkovic, J. van der Tang, A. Leeuwenburgh, and A. H. M.

    van Roermund, A Low-Voltage Folded-Switching Mixer in

    0.18 m CMOS, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 40, no. 6,

    pp. 1259-1264, Jun. 2005.

    [10] C. H. Chen, P. Y. Chiang, and C. F. Jou, A Low Voltage Mixer

    with Improved Noise Figure, IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon.

    Lett, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 92-94, Feb. 2009.

    BIOGRAPHIES

    Alireza Saberkari received the B.Sc. degree in Electrical

    Engineering from the University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran, in

    2002 and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees both in Electrical

    Engineering from the Iran University of Science and

    Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran, in 2004 and 2010,

    respectively. Since 2010, he has been with the Department

    of Electrical Engineering at the University of Guilan as an

    Assistant Professor. From September 2008 to August 2009,

    he was with the group of Energy Processing Integrated Circuits, Department

    of Electronic Engineering, Technical University of Catalunya (UPC),

    Barcelona, Spain, as a Visiting Scholar. His fields of interest include the areas

    of Analog and Mixed-Signal Microelectronics with particular interest in

    CMOS Mixers, RF Power Amplifiers, Linear Regulators, Current-Mode

    Circuit Design, Low-Power and Low-Voltage Integrated Circuits, and Vision

    Chips.

    Shahriar B. Shokouhi is currently an Assistant Professor in

    Electrical Engineering at the Iran University of Science and

    Technology, Tehran, Iran. He earned his Ph.D. degree in

    Electrical Engineering in 1999 from the University of Bath inEngland. His fields of interest are Machine Vision and Image

    Processing Algorithms, Design and Implementing Processors

    and Vision Chips, Integrated Mixed Mode Circuits, 3-D

    Vision and Range Finding Techniques, Optoelectronic Integrated Circuits,

    Navigation and Tracking, IT, Security and Networking.