ee481 p11 root locus design
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
EE481 Control Systems
Kunio Takaya
Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Saskatchewan
October 28, 2009
Chapter 9: Design Via Root Locus
** Go to full-screen mode now by hitting CTRL-L
1
![Page 2: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
University of Saskatchewan, Electrical Engineering
EE 481.3 Control Systems
April 2009, Kunio Takaya
Textbook: Norman S. Nise, “Control Systems Engineering” Fifth
Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2008, ISBN-13 978-0471-79475-2.
Marks: Midterm Exam: 30%, Final Exam 55%, and Assignments
15%
1. Modeling in the frequency domain
• Laplace transform
• Transfer functions
2. Modeling in the time domain
2
![Page 3: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Linear differential equations
• State-Space representation
3. Time response
• Second-Order Systems
• Poles and zeros
• Time domain solution of state equations
4. Reduction of multiple subsystems
• Block diagrams and Signal-Flow graphs
• Mason’s rule
• Similarity transformations
5. Stability
• Routh-Hurwitz criterion
• Stability in State-Space
3
![Page 4: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
6. Steady-State errors
• Steady-State error for unity gain feedback
• Steady-State error for disturbance
7. Root Locus techniques
• Sketching the root locus
• Transient response design via gain adjustment
8. Design via root locus
• Cascade compensation
• Improving transient response and steady-state error
9. Frequency response techniques
• Bode plots
• Nyquist diagrams
• Systems with time delay
4
![Page 5: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
10. Design via frequency response
• Lag compasation
• Lead compensation
Classes: MWF 8:30-9:30 a.m. 1B79 Engineering
My office: 3B31
Email: [email protected]
5
![Page 6: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
What is the Root Locus?
The open loop transfer function is Go(s) =K1K2
s(s+ 10)=
K
s(s+ 10).
Its closed loop transfer function is,
Gc(s) =Go
1 +Go=
K
s2 + 10s+K
6
![Page 7: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
![Page 8: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
![Page 9: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Properties of the root locus
T (s) =KG(s)
1 +KG(s)H(s)
KG(s)H(s) = −1 = 1 6 (2k+ 1)180◦, where k = 0,±1,±2,±3, · · ·
9
![Page 10: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The closed loop poles have to satisfy the following conditions.
jKG(s)H(s)j = 1 (1)
6 KG(s)H(s) = (2k + 1)180◦ (2)
K that satisfies the first condition is given by
K =1
jG(s)jjH(s)j
10
![Page 11: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
![Page 12: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
A value of K satisfying Eq. (1) is s = −2± j√
22 .
6 θ1 + 6 θ2 − 6 θ3 − 6 θ4 = 180◦
K =L3L4
L1L2= 0.33
12
![Page 13: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
An example of Root Locus
13
![Page 14: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
1 Design Via Root Locus
We follow the following appoaches to study the root locus based
design.
1. cascade compensators to improve the steady state error
PI Controller and (Phase) Lag Compasator
2. cascade compensators to improve the transient response
PD Controller and (Phase) Lead Compensator
3. cascade compensators to improve the steady state error and
transient response
PID Controller and (Phase) Lag-Lead Compensator, Notch
Filter
We will look at both of analytical approach, and try-and-error
approach (MATLAB).
14
![Page 15: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
2 PI (Proportional and Integral) Controller,
adding an integrator and a zero
Gc(s) =s+ zcs
15
![Page 16: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
![Page 17: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
![Page 18: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Example 9.1 PI controller
Eliminate the steady state error for step input without changing
transient response by a PI compensator,
Gc(s) =K(s+ 0.1)
sfor G(s) =
1
(s+ 1)(s+ 2)(s+ 10)
The closed loop system’s damping ratio should be ζ = 0.174.
18
![Page 19: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
![Page 20: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
![Page 21: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
![Page 22: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Example 9.1 MATLAB Solution
% Example 9.1 p.441
% K. Takaya
’(ch8p2) Example 9.1’ % Display label.
clear all % Clear variables from workspace.
close all; % clear graph on screen.
numg=[1]; % Define numerator of G(s).
deng=poly([-1 -2 -10]); % Define denominator of G(s).
’G(s)’ % Display label.
G=tf(numg,deng) % Create and display G(s).
figure(1);
rlocus(G) % Draw root locus (H(s)=1).
title(’Original Root Locus’) % Add title.
z=input(’Damping ratio: enter 0.174 = ’);
% Input damping ratio from the keyboard.
wn=0;
sgrid(z,wn) % Overlay desired damping ratio line
% on root locus.
title([’Root Locus with ’,num2str(z),’ damping ratio’])
% Define title for root locus
% showing percent overshoot used.
[K,p]=rlocfind(G) % Generate gain, K, and closed-loop
% poles, p, for point selected
22
![Page 23: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
% interactively on the root locus.
pause;
’T(s)’ % Display label.
T=feedback(K*G,1) % Find closed-loop transfer function
% with selected K and display.
figure(2);
step(T) % Generate closed-loop step response
% for point selected on root locus.
title([’Step Response for K=’,num2str(K)])
% Give step response a title which
% includes the value of K.
Kp=K*1/(1*2*10)
ess=1/(1+Kp)
[numc,denc]=tfdata(T,’v’)
finalvalu=numc(4)/denc(4)
pause;
numg1=poly([-0.1]); % Define numerator of G(s).
deng1=poly([0 -1 -2 -10]); % Define denominator of G(s).
’G1(s)’ % Display label.
G1=tf(numg1,deng1) % Create and display G(s).
figure(3);
rlocus(G1) % Draw root locus (H(s)=1).
title(’Original Root Locus’) % Add title.
23
![Page 24: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
wn=0;
sgrid(z,wn) % Overlay desired damping ratio line
% on root locus.
title([’Root Locus with ’,num2str(z),’ damping ratio’])
[K1,p1]=rlocfind(G1) % Generate gain, K, and closed-loop
% poles, p, for point selected
% interactively on the root locus.
pause
’T1(s)’ % Display label.
T1=feedback(K1*G1,1) % Find closed-loop transfer function
% with selected K1 and display.
figure(4);
time=[0:0.2:40];
step(T,’r’,T1,’b’,time) % Generate closed-loop step response
% for point selected on root locus.
title([’Step Response for K=’,num2str(K), ’ and K1=’, num2str(K1)])
24
![Page 25: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
3 Phase Lag Compensator, adding a pole
and a zero
Gc(s) =s+ zcs+ pc
We try to improve error coefficient K from the original system’s Ko
to a compensated system’s Kn. For this particular systemof type I,
we improve Kv, velocity error coefficient.
Kv = lims→0
sG(s) and e(∞) =1
Kv
25
![Page 26: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
![Page 27: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Kvo = lims→0
sG(s) = lims→0
sK(s+ z1)(s+ z2) · · ·s(s+ p1)(s+ p2) · · ·
=Kz1z2 · · ·p1p2 · · ·
Kvn = lims→0
sG′(s) = lims→0
sK(s+ zc)(s+ z1)(s+ z2) · · ·s(s+ pc)(s+ p1)(s+ p2) · · ·
=K(z1z2 · · ·)(zc)(p1p2 · · ·)(pc)
Choose such that Kvn = Kvozcpc> Kvo
Thus, relative positions of the compensator pole and zero are
zc > pc or − zc < −pc.
27
![Page 28: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Example 9.2 Phase Lag compensator
Compensate the system to improve the steady state error by a
factor of 10 if the system is operating with a damping ratio of
0.174. The uncompensated system that gives ζ = 0.174 is shown in
the next root locus plot.
29
![Page 30: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
![Page 31: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Adjust zc and pc for required steady state error
The root locus gain K to cross the ζ = 0.174 line is K = 164.6.
The position error coefficient Kplant of the plant is
Kplant = lims→0
1
(s+ 1)(s+ 2)(s+ 10)=
1
20
Kp (DC gain) = K ×Kplant = 164.6× 1
20= 8.23
and e(∞) =1
1 +Kp= 0.108
Now, we want to reduce the steady state error by a factor of 10.
e(∞) =0.108
10= 0.0108
Since e(∞) =1
1 +Kp= 0.0108,
31
![Page 32: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The new Kp is
Kp =1− e(∞)
e(∞)=
1− 0.0108
0.0108= 91.95
From
KN = KOzcpc> KO,
zcpc
=KpN
KpO=
91.95
8.23= 11.13
Where, pc = 0.01 has arbitrarily chosen.
zc = 11.13pc = 0.111
32
![Page 33: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Find compensator gain K such that damping factor is ζ = 0.174
% Example 9.2 p.446
% K. Takaya, Oct. 21, 2009
numZero=[-0.111];
denPole=[-0.01, -1, -2, -10];
num=poly(numZero);
den=poly(denPole);
sys=tf(num,den);
’Draw damping ratio 0.174 line’
rlocus(sys);
sgrid(0.174, 0);
[K,p]=rlocfind(sys)
33
![Page 34: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The compensator gain K = 158.1 was found by MATLAB program.
34
![Page 35: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
![Page 36: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Try pole at s = −0.001 instead of s = −0.01. This results in a
larger offset.
36
![Page 37: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
![Page 38: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
4 PD Compensator, adding a zero
Gc(s) = s+ zc
The Proportional and Derivative (PD) controller generally quickens
the transient response. Zeros will pull the root locus toward the
zero. Poles will push the root locus away from the pole.
Look at time constant T =1
ζωnwhich determines the decay part
of 2nd order response, e−ζωnt. (a) T = 1, (b) T = 1/3 = 0.33, (c)
T = 1/2.5 = 0.4, (d) T = 1/1.869 = 0.535 for ζ = 0.4 of
G(s) =K
(s+ 1)(s+ 2)(s+ 5).
38
![Page 39: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
![Page 40: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
![Page 41: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
![Page 42: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Example 9.3 PD controller
Design a PD controller to yields 16% overshoot, with a threefold
reduction in settling time.
% OS = e−(ζπ/√
1−ζ2) × 100
16% overshoot yields ζ = 0.504. Draw the root locus of
uncompensated system.
42
![Page 43: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
The second order poles are at −1.205± j2.064. Time constant is
T = 1/1.205. The settling time is
Ts =4
ζωn=
4
1.205= 3.320
43
![Page 44: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The new settling time of threefold reduction is
T ′s = Ts/3 = 1.107 =⇒ σ =1
T ′s/4= 3.613
The new closed loop pole is at s = −σ ± jωd.
44
![Page 45: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
From cos θ = ζ = 0.504, we obtain θ = 59.735◦.
ωd = σ tan θ = 6.193
This s = −σ ± jωd = −3.613± j6.193 must be on the root locus
satisfying the angle condition,
− 6 s− 6 (s+ 4)− 6 (s+ 6) + 6 (s+ σ) = 180◦
−120.2593◦ − 86.4242◦ − 68.9216◦ + 6 (s+ σ) = 180◦
6 (s+ σ) = 95.6051◦
6.193
3.631− σ= tan(180◦ − 95.6◦) =⇒ σ = 3.006
45
![Page 46: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
![Page 47: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
![Page 48: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The third pole is at s = −2.775 which is too close to the real part
of second order poles, and (closed loop) pole and zero are close but
do not cancel each other, so the second order approximation is not
valid. The residue of the third order pole by the partial fraction
48
![Page 49: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
expansion can tell if the second order approximation is valid or not.
49
![Page 50: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
5 PID Compensator, adding two zeros and
a pole at s = 0
Gc(s) = KP +KI
s+KDs =
KP s+KI +KDs2
s
=KD(s2 +
KP
KDs+
KI
KD)
s
1. Evaluate the uncompensated system to determine how much
improvement is required in transient response.
2. Design the PD controller that meets the transient response
specifications
3. Simulate to be sure if the PD controller meets the
specifications.
50
![Page 51: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
4. Design the PI controller to yield the required steady-state error.
5. Determine gains KP , KI , and KD
6. Simulate to be sure if all requirements have been met.
Example 9.5 PID controller design
Design a PID controller so that the system can operate with a peak
time that is two-thirds that of the uncompensated system at 20%
overshoot and with zero steady-state error for a step input.
Step 1, Find uncompensated peak time Tp for 20% overshoot
51
![Page 52: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Using MATLAB, plot the root locus and find the characteristics ofthe uncompensated system.
’(ch9p2) Example 9.5 PID’ % Display label.
’Uncompensated System’ % Display label.
numg=poly([-8]); % Generate numerator of G(s).
deng=poly([-3 -6 -10]); % Generate denominator of G(s).
G=tf(numg,deng)
pos=20
z=-log(pos/100)/sqrt(pi^2+[log(pos/100)]^2);
% Calculate damping ratio.
K0=[0:1:300];
rlocus(G, K0) % Plot uncompensated root locus.
sgrid(z,0) % Overlay desired percent overshoot line.
title([’Uncompensated Root Locus with ’ , num2str(pos),...
’% overshoot Line’]) % Title uncompensated root locus.
[K,p]=rlocfind(G) % Generate gain, K, and closed-loop
% poles, p, for point selected
% interactively on the root locus.
hold on;
’Closed-loop poles = ’ % Display label.
p % Display closed-loop poles.
f=input(’Give pole number that is operating point ’);
% Choose uncompensated system
% dominant pole.
52
![Page 53: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
’Summary of estimated specifications for selected point on’
’uncompensated root locus’ % Display label.
operatingpoint=p(f) % Display uncompensated dominant pole.
gain=K % Display uncompensated gain.
estimated_settling_time=4/abs(real(p(f)))
% Display uncompensated settling time.
estimated_peak_time=pi/abs(imag(p(f)))
% Display uncompensated peak time.
estimated_percent_overshoot=pos % Display uncompensated percent overshoot.
estimated_damping_ratio=z % Display uncompensated damping ratio.
estimated_natural_frequency=sqrt(real(p(f))^2+imag(p(f))^2)
% Display uncompensated natural frequency.
53
![Page 54: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
![Page 55: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The damping ratio is calculated by
ζ =− ln(%OS/100)
√
π2 + [ln(%OS/100)]2= 0.456 for %OS = 20%
The uncompensated poles found from the root locus are at
s = σ ± jωd = −5.415± j10.57 at gain K = 121.5. The peak time
is,
Tp =π
ωn√
1− ζ2=
π
ωd= 0.297
Step 2, Design PD controller to reduce Tp to two-thirds
’(ch9p2) Example 9.5 PID’ % ... continued
’reduce peak time to 2/3’
Tp=(2/3)* estimated_peak_time
’new omega_d’
wd=pi/Tp
’angle to operating point’
theta=angle(p(f));
theta_deg=theta*180/pi
55
![Page 56: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
sigma=wd/tan(theta)
’compensated pole location’
x=sigma+j*wd
plot(sigma,wd,’*b’,sigma,-wd,’*b’);
pause
’add PD controller, additional zero’
angle8=angle(x+8);
angle8d=angle8*180/pi
angle3=angle(x+3);
angle3d=angle3*180/pi
angle6=angle(x+6);
angle6d=angle6*180/pi
angle10=angle(x+10);
angle10d=angle10*180/pi
anglePD=-angle8d+angle3d+angle6d+angle10d-180
anglePD=-angle8+angle3+angle6+angle10-pi;
% wd/(zc+sigma)=tan anglePD
’PD zero location’
zc=wd/tan(anglePD)-sigma
pause
numkv=conv([1 zc],numg); % add (s+zc).
denkv=deng; % denominator is the same.
pdG=tf(numkv,denkv); % Create pdG(s).
pdG=minreal(pdG); % Cancel common poles and zeros.
56
![Page 57: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
rlocus(pdG) % plot new root locus
Since we have to reduce Tp down to two-thirds,
ωd =π
Tp=
π
(2/3)0.297= 15.87
The line of ζ = 0.456 and ωd = 15.87 yield the compensated poles
are at s = −8.13± j15.87. The angle of the new pole must satisfy,
6 (s+ 8) + 6 (s+ zc)− 6 (s+ 3)− 6 (s+ 6)− 6 (s+ 10) = ±180◦
6 (s+ zc) = 18.37◦ is found from the MATLAB program.
57
![Page 58: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
(σ + zc) tan 18.36 = 15.87 =⇒ zc = 55.92
Thus, GPD(s) = s+ 55.92
58
![Page 59: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Plot the root locus for the compensated system with PD controller.
Using rlocfind(G) find the compensated closed loop poles and
gain. s = −8.13± j15.87 and K = 5.34.
59
![Page 60: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Step 4, Design PI controller to make the steady state error to
be zero. The PI controller,
GPI =s+ z0
s=s+ 0.5
s.
reduces the steady state error of Type 0 systems to zero. The value
of z0 is arbitrary as long as z0 is close to the pole at s = 0. Choose
z0 = 0.5.
60
![Page 61: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
GPID =K(s+ 55.92)(s+ 0.5)
s=
4.6(s+ 55.92)(s+ 0.5)
s
61
![Page 62: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
=4.6(s2 + 56.42s+ 27.96
s=KD(s2 +
KP
KDs+
KI
KD)
s
Thus, our design is KP = 259.5, KI = 128.6, and KD = 4.6. Step
responses are shown below.
62
![Page 63: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
63
![Page 64: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
6 Lead Lag Compensator, adding two zeros
and two poles
Gc(s) = Ks+ zc1s+ pc1
× s+ zc2s+ pc2
The design procedure is as follows:
1. Evaluate the uncompensated system to determine how much
improvement is required in transient response.
2. Design the Phase Lead compensator that meets the transient
response specifications
3. Simulate to be sure if the Lead controller meets the
specifications.
4. Evaluate the steady-state error performance of the
uncompensated system to determine how much more
64
![Page 65: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
improvement is required.
5. Design the Phase Lag compensator to yield the required
steady-state error.
6. Simulate to be sure if all requirements have been met.
Example 9.6 Lag-Lead compensator design
Design a Lag-Lead compensator such that the system will operate
with 20% overshoot, and a twofold reduction in settling time.
Further, the compensated system will exhibit a tenfold
improvement in steady-state error for a ramp input.
65
![Page 66: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Step 1.
20% overshoot yields ζ = 0.456.
ζ =− ln(%OS/100)
√
π2 + [ln(%OS/100)]2= 0.456 for %OS = 20%
Using the root locus for the uncompensated system, the
intersection of the locus and the 20% overshoot line gives the
operating point,
s = −1.794± 3.501 and Gain K = 192.1
The time constant of the dominant poles is,
T =1
ζωn=
1
1.794= 0.5574, =⇒ Ts = 4T = 2.2297
66
![Page 67: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Step 2
We want a twofold reduction in settling time.
Ts (new) = 1.115 =⇒ −ζωn = 2× 1.794 = −3.588
ωd = ζωn tan 117.13◦ = 3.588 tan 117.13◦ = 7.003
In order to have the intersection at -3.588, we have to move the
root locus to left. We can place the zero of the Lead compensator
67
![Page 68: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
s+ zc1 = 0 to the system pole at s = −6.
The transfer function of the Lead compensated system is
GLead(s) = Ks+ zc1s+ pc1
× 1
s(s+ 6)(s+ 10)
= Ks+ 6
s+ pc1
1
s(s+ 6)(s+ 10)= K
1
s(s+ pc1)(s+ 10)
− 6 s− 6 (s+ pc1)− 6 (s+ 10) = ±180◦
6 s = 117.13◦,
6 (s+ 10) = 6 (−3.588± j7.003)− (−10)
= tan−1
(
7.003
6.4120
)
= 47.5225◦
6 (s+ pc1) = − 6 s− 6 (s+ 10)+180◦ = 47.5225−117.13+180 = 15.3475◦
68
![Page 69: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
7.003
pc − 3.588= tan 15.3475◦ =⇒ pc = −29.1
Glead(s) = K1
s(s+ pc1)(s+ 10)= K
1
s(s+ 29.1)(s+ 10)
Step 3, 4
69
![Page 70: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Thus, K = 1977 is found from the root locus.
Step 5
Glead(s) = 19771
s(s+ 29.1)(s+ 10)
70
![Page 71: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
This system is of Type 1, so consider the velocity error coefficient
Kv.
Kv = lims→0
sGlead(s) =1977
291= 6.7938 =⇒ e(∞) = 0.1472
The steady state error of the uncompensated system is 0.312,
which must be reduced by a tenfold, i.e. 0.0312.
0.1472× α = 0.0312 =⇒ α = 0.2120 additional error reduction
In terms of gain ratio,
KvN
KvO=zcpc
=1
0.2120= 4.713 =
zc = 0.04713
pc = 0.01
Gc,Lag =s+ 0.04713
s+ 0.01
71
![Page 72: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Step 6
Therefore,
GLag,Lead = Ks+ 0.04713
s(s+ 10)(s+ 29.1)(s+ 0.01)
K = 1971 will be found from the root locus.
72
![Page 73: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
73
![Page 74: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
The value of K that gives ζ = 0.456 is found from the root locus as
K = 1971.
74
![Page 75: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
75
![Page 76: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
76
![Page 77: Ee481 p11 Root Locus Design](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042502/544cef82b1af9f2a198b46cc/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
77