ee--health: australia vs health: australia vs england 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · england: 48.1% 50 60...

30
e-Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 England 2015 Health Information Technology Ashes Health Information Technology Ashes Series (HITAS) Series (HITAS) HISA NSW 2008 HISA NSW 2008 HISA NSW 2008 HISA NSW 2008 Paul Willma Paul Willma Director Cerner Corporation Director Cerner Corporation Director, Cerner Corporation Director, Cerner Corporation

Upload: others

Post on 18-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015England 2015

Health Information Technology Ashes Health Information Technology Ashes Series (HITAS) Series (HITAS)

HISA NSW 2008HISA NSW 2008HISA NSW 2008HISA NSW 2008Paul WillmaPaul Willma

Director Cerner CorporationDirector Cerner CorporationDirector, Cerner CorporationDirector, Cerner Corporation

Page 2: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

The Ashes 1882The Ashes 1882Cricket Game England vs AustraliaCricket Game England vs Australia

Page 3: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

TopicsTopicsTopicsTopics

Why change & what could be achieved?Why change & what could be achieved?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What needs to change for us to win?What needs to change for us to win?

Page 4: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy
Page 5: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

AustraliaAustraliaTotal Hard Savings Total Hard Savings

T t l H d S i A t liTotal Hard Savings - Australia

4 500 000 000

3 000 000 0003 500 000 0004 000 000 000

s

Total Medication Savings - afteradoptionTotal Friction Savings - after

1 500 000 0002 000 000 0002 500 000 000

Savi

ngs g

adoptionTotal Waste - after adoption

500 000 0001 000 000 000 Total Savings

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

Date

1 CITL: The Value of Computerized Provider Order Entry in Ambulatory Settings2 GAO Information Technology Benefits Realized for Selected Health Care Functions, October 2003, http://www.gao3 HealthGrades Quality Study, Patient Safety in American Hospitals. July 2004.4 Franciscan Health System Enterprise Scheduling Management Benefits Study November, 2002

Page 6: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

TopicsTopicsTopicsTopics

Why change & what could be achieved?Why change & what could be achieved?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What needs to change for us to win?What needs to change for us to win?

Page 7: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

HITAS: The Two TeamsHITAS: The Two TeamsHITAS: The Two TeamsHITAS: The Two TeamsPopulation 50MPopulation 50M1 2 million employees1 2 million employees

National Health Service in EnglandNational Health Service in England1.2 million employees1.2 million employees35,000 General Practitioners (GPs)35,000 General Practitioners (GPs)9,000 GP practices9,000 GP practices26,000 Hospital consultants26,000 Hospital consultants26,000 Hospital consultants26,000 Hospital consultants170 Acute hospitals + 130 others170 Acute hospitals + 130 others13 million referrals13 million referrals+ 180 ‘independent/private’ + 180 ‘independent/private’ p /pp /phospitalshospitals

Population 21MPopulation 21MPopulation 21MPopulation 21MFederal responsibility for primary Federal responsibility for primary carecareState responsibility for hospitalsState responsibility for hospitals

Australian Health “System”Australian Health “System”

p y pp y p729 public sector hospitals729 public sector hospitals81,153 beds81,153 beds140,000 employees140,000 employeesp yp y40,000+ General Practitioners (GPs)40,000+ General Practitioners (GPs)532 ‘independent/private’ hospitals532 ‘independent/private’ hospitals

Page 8: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Life Expectancy and Life Expectancy and Expenditure ComparisonExpenditure Comparison

70

80Health expenditure as % of GDP in 2053:

England: 48.1%

50

60g

Australia: 100.0%Assuming flat GDP

30

40 EnglandAustralia

0

10

20

0Life

ExpectancyExpenditure %

GDPExpenditureIncrease %

OECDOECD

Page 9: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

What will be achieved in What will be achieved in 2015?2015?2015?2015?

Based on current run rateBased on current run rate

National IT StrategyNational IT StrategyFunding/Business ModelFunding/Business ModelFunding/Business ModelFunding/Business ModelPlansPlansT h l d hit tT h l d hit tTechnology and architecturesTechnology and architecturesGeography and infraGeography and infra--structurestructureSoftware Software Implementation modelsImplementation modelsChange managementChange management

Page 10: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

National IT Strategies?National IT Strategies?National IT Strategies?National IT Strategies?E l d NHSE l d NHS AustraliaAustralia

Connecting for Health StrategyConnecting for Health StrategyC l l ( h iC l l ( h i

NeHTA work programNeHTA work programU i H lth Id tifi tiU i H lth Id tifi ti

England NHSEngland NHS AustraliaAustralia

Central control (changing to Central control (changing to give Trusts more choice)give Trusts more choice)10 year plan (funded)10 year plan (funded)

Ch & B k ( h d li )Ch & B k ( h d li )

Unique Healthcare IdentificationUnique Healthcare IdentificationEE--Health InteroperabilityHealth InteroperabilityClinical CommunicationsClinical CommunicationsIdentity ManagementIdentity ManagementChoose & Book (scheduling)Choose & Book (scheduling)

Spine (EHR, identifiers)Spine (EHR, identifiers)SouthSouthLondonLondon

Identity ManagementIdentity ManagementSecure MessagingSecure MessagingShared Electronic Health RecordShared Electronic Health RecordSupply ChainSupply ChainLondonLondon

North EastNorth EastNorth WestNorth WestEast MidlandsEast Midlands

Supply Chain Supply Chain NSW: eMR foundation projectNSW: eMR foundation projectVic: HealthSmartVic: HealthSmartSASA ca econnect saca econnect saEast MidlandsEast Midlands SA: SA: careconnect.sacareconnect.saQld: developing strategies/plansQld: developing strategies/plansWA: InfoHealth WA: InfoHealth -- developing developing strategies/plansstrategies/plansstrategies/plansstrategies/plansACT: developing strategies/plansACT: developing strategies/plans

Page 11: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

England NHS England NHS Release Strategy Release Strategy

Page 12: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy
Page 13: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

20152015EngEng AusAusYesYes

YesYes

YY NSW ViNSW ViYesYes NSW, VicNSW, Vic

YesYes NSW, VicNSW, Vic

YesYes QldQld

YesYes YesYesYesYes YesYes

YesYes YesYes

YesYes YesYes

Page 14: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

How do our investment levels How do our investment levels compare?compare?

CountryCountry StageStage ExpenditureExpenditure Ex per headEx per head Time FrameTime Frame

UKUK Modernising ITModernising IT $15B$15B $288$288 10 yrs10 yrsgg $$ $$ yy

AustraliaAustralia Developing Developing Strategy/PlansStrategy/Plans

Announced Announced projects: projects:

$185$185 ? yrs? yrsgy/gy/ p jp j

$3.7B$3.7B

Notes:Notes:Source: MedInfo 2004 (Sept) and NEHTA 2007Source: MedInfo 2004 (Sept) and NEHTA 2007$ are in AUD$ are in AUD

Page 15: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Integration/Implementation Integration/Implementation Model Cost ConsiderationsModel Cost ConsiderationsRelative Cost of True Integration and Interfaced (repository) Models

$600,000,000

Relative Cost of True Integration and Interfaced (repository) Models

$400,000,000

$500,000,000

$

$300,000,000

$400,000,000Interfaced(Repository)Intergrated (Clinicals)

$100,000,000

$200,000,000Intergrated (Clinicals)

$0SA NSW

Estimates/projections based on population basis and published project costs

Integrated models are an order of magnitude less expensive to implement

Page 16: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Key delivery systems• NHS Care Records Service - 371,277 registered users• Choose and Book - 4,654,247 bookings made• Electronic Transmission of

Prescriptions (ETP)- 30,581,484 prescription messages issued

N3 N t k f th NHS 20 157 ti• N3 Network for the NHS - 20,157 connections• NHSmail - 268,622 registered users

Di it l Pi t A hi i d 13 886 418 ti t t di• Digital Picture Archiving and Communications Systems

-13,886,418 patient studies-305,044,652 images

• GP IT -GP IT Quality Management and Analysis System

- 100% GP site deployment

GP to GP record transfer - 2nd live trial completed*all data correct at 06/08/2007

Page 17: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

AustraliaAustralia Victoria ApproachVictoria ApproachAustralia Australia –– Victoria ApproachVictoria Approach

Page 18: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

AustraliaAustralia NSW ApproachNSW ApproachAustralia Australia –– NSW ApproachNSW Approach

Page 19: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

…”right information. right place. right time”Forward StrategyProposed eMR Coverageg

2006 FY ’08/’09

Patient Index ProviderIndex

Electronic Health Record Image Archive Patient Admin

& SchedulingCore Clinical

Comps

Electronic Discharge Referral

EmergencyDepartment

OperatingTheatre

IntensiveCare Units

CommunityHealth Radiology

Picture Archive & Comms

Digital Dictation & Voice Rec

(AHS) (UPI) (HSPD) (EHR) (PAS) (EMR) (eDRS) (ED) (OT) (ICU) (RIS) (PACS) (DD/VR)

AreaHealth

Services

Master Indexes Clinical History Core Clinical Applications Clinical Diagnostic Service

RadiologyPicture

Archive & Comms

Digital Dictation & Voice Rec

Pathology Pharmacy Diets AlliedHealth

(RIS) (PACS) (DD/VR)

Allied Health ServicesClinical Diagnostic Services

2006 FY ’08/’09

CHW * AUID Cerner

* Limited or None

* Health- elink

* in PACS (isolated)

* Cerner PAS

* Cerner Not SBB

* Health e-care

* Health-e -care * ORSOS * Eclipsys * None * Cerner

Classic * Siemens * Both DD & VR

GSAHS * AUID eIndex

* Limited or None * None * in PACS

(isolated)* iSOFT IPM * None * None * EDIS V6

* ORSOS* OTIS* MS Access

* None * CHIME* HOSREP* Private Practice

* CDN* Private Practice* Film

* Both DD & VR* None

*CDN

* Cerner Classic * Siemens * Both DD

& VR* Cerner Pathnet * STOCCA * CBORD * AHMIS

* HOSREP* Private Practice

* CDN* Private Practice* Film

* Both DD & VR* None

* Kestrel * AMFAC * CBORD * AHMIS

*CDN

GWAHS * AUID eIndex

* Limited or None * None * in PACS

(isolated)* iSOFT IPM * None * None * EDIS V6

* OTIS* MS Access

* None * CHIME * HOSREP

CDN* Private Practice* Film

* Both DD & VR* None

HNEAHS * iPM * Limited or None

* Health- elink

* Centrally at John Hunter

* iSOFT IPM * Orion * Global

* iSOFT PAS ED Module EDIS V6

* iSOFT IPM* Thesis* MS Access

* None * CHIME * KODAK* HOSREP

* KODAK* AGFA* Film

* Some DD No VR* None

NCAHS * AUIDCerner

* Limited or None * None * in PACS

(isolated)* CernerPAS * None * None * EDIS V6

* ORMIS* MS * None * CHIME * HOSREP

* CDN* Private Practice

* Both DD & VR

* HOSREP

CDN* Private Practice* Film

* Both DD & VR* None

* Cerner Pathnet * AMFAC * CBORD * AHMIS

* KODAK* HOSREP

* KODAK* AGFA* Film

* Some DD No VR* None

* AUSLAB * STOCCA* AMFAC * CBORD * AHMIS

* HOSREP

* CDN* Private Practice

* Both DD & VR * Ketsrel

*Medipath* STOCCA*AMFAC * CBORD * None Cerner None (isolated) PAS Access Practice

* Film * None

NSCCAHS * AUID Cerner

* Limited or None * None * in PACS

(isolated) * Cerner PAS* None * Global * EDIS V6* OTIS* PRBS* ORMIS

* None * CHIME * HOSREP * Film* Limited DD* None

SESIAHS * AUID eIndex

* Limited or None * None * in PACS

(isolated)* iSOFT IPM * None * Global * EDIS V6

* EDIS V9

* ORMIS* ORSC* DeLacy* MSAccess

* GE* None * CHIME

* GE Cent6* HOSREP* Détente

* GE Cent2* CDN* KODAK

* Both DD & VR* None

Practice* Film * None Medipath AMFAC

* HOSREP * Film* Limited DD* None

*AUSLAB* Pathnet * STOCCA * CBORD * AHMIS

* GE Cent6* HOSREP* Détente

* GE Cent2* CDN* KODAK

* Both DD & VR* None

* Détente* OMNI LAB* STOCCA * CBORD * AHMIS

Access

SSWAHS * AUID Cerner

* Limited or None * None * in PACS

(isolated)* Cerner PAS

* Cerner Not SBB * Cerner

* EDIS V6 Cerner FirstNet

* TMIS* SurgiNET* OTMS

* Phillips* None

* Cerner Millenium * HOSREP

* CDN* AGFA* Film

* Both DD & VR* None

SWAHS * AUID eIndex

* Limited or None * Health-eLink * in PACS

(isolated)* iSOFT IPM

* Cerner Not SBB * Cerner * EDIS V6

* EDIS V9

* iSOFT IPM* OTIS* MS Access

* GE* None * CHIME * HOSREP

* GE (Older)* Film

* Limited DD* None

* HOSREP* CDN* AGFA* Film

* Both DD & VR* None

* Cerner Pathnet* Cerner Medipath* AUSLAB

* STOCCA * CBORD * AHMIS

* HOSREP* GE (Older)* Film

* Limited DD* None

* Cerner Pathnet * AMFAC * CBORD * AHMIS

Legend Strategic Direction Started Tactical CoverageStrategic Direction Advanced Limited or No Coverage

Page 20: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Infrastructure, Geography and Infrastructure, Geography and Telecommunications (Australia/BritishTelecommunications (Australia/BritishTelecommunications (Australia/British Telecommunications (Australia/British

Isles)Isles)AustraliaMobile Broadband speeds/coverageSpeed Current•Speed = Current

14.4Mb/Sec (40 Mb/sec in 2009)•Coverage = 98.8%g

EnglandWide Area Broadband speeds/coverage•Speed = Current 2 Mb/sec•Coverage = 64-80%

Page 21: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Application Vendor SelectionApplication Vendor SelectionApplication Vendor SelectionApplication Vendor SelectionNational Health Service in EnglandNational Health Service in England Choose & BookChoose & Book SelectedSelected

SpineSpine SelectedSelected

SouthSouth SelectedSelected

LondonLondon SelectedSelectedLondonLondon SelectedSelected

North EastNorth East SelectedSelected

North WestNorth West SelectedSelected

East MidlandsEast Midlands SelectedSelected

NSWNSW SelectedSelected

Australian Health “System”Australian Health “System” VicVic SelectedSelected

SASA Selected; PAS legacySelected; PAS legacy

QldQld ? PAS l? PAS lQldQld ?; PAS legacy?; PAS legacy

WAWA ?; PAS legacy?; PAS legacy

TasTas ?; PAS?; PASTasTas ?; PAS?; PAS

ACTACT ?; PAS legacy?; PAS legacy

NTNT Selected; PAS legacySelected; PAS legacy

Page 22: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Hits Based on Current Run Hits Based on Current Run Rate Rate

Eng ScoreEng Score Aus ScoreAus ScoreEng ScoreEng Score Aus ScoreAus ScoreWin the toss: decision…Win the toss: decision… BatBat

National IT StrategyNational IT Strategy 66 lbwlbwNational IT StrategyNational IT Strategy 66 lbwlbw

FundingFunding 66 CaughtCaught

PlanPlan 66 44PlanPlan 66 44

ArchitectureArchitecture 66 44

St d dSt d d 66 66StandardsStandards 66 66

Infrastructure (Telecoms, networks, Infrastructure (Telecoms, networks, Hardware)Hardware)

44 44Hardware)Hardware)

Software vendor selection completeSoftware vendor selection complete 66 22

Change managementChange management CaughtCaught lbwlbwChange managementChange management CaughtCaught lbwlbw

Implementation modelsImplementation models 66 22

Page 23: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

TopicsTopicsTopicsTopics

Why change & what could be achieved?Why change & what could be achieved?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What will have been achieved in 2015?What needs to change for us to win?What needs to change for us to win?

Page 24: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Is it too late?Is it too late?Is it too late?Is it too late?

“This thing can be done”.“This thing can be done”.

Fred Spofforth, Australian Bowler who refused to Fred Spofforth, Australian Bowler who refused to i i d t t d t t th E li hi i d t t d t t th E li hgive in and went on to devastate the English give in and went on to devastate the English

batting, 1882batting, 1882

Page 25: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

A Model Health System for AustraliaA Model Health System for AustraliaA Model Health System for AustraliaA Model Health System for Australia

Significant structural problems:Significant structural problems:

Poor use of information technology, where Poor use of information technology, where better investments and usage could not onlybetter investments and usage could not onlybetter investments and usage could not only better investments and usage could not only reduce administrative costs but also support reduce administrative costs but also support more continuity of care better identification ofmore continuity of care better identification ofmore continuity of care, better identification of more continuity of care, better identification of patients at risk, greater safety and more patient patients at risk, greater safety and more patient controlcontrolcontrolcontrol

Reference: Andrew Podger AO, Adjunct Professor, ANU, “A Model Health System for Australia”, Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management 2006; 1:1

Page 26: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

One Example of a SEHR for AustraliaOne Example of a SEHR for Australia

Page 27: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Implementing Clinical Systems Implementing Clinical Systems -- a “Complex a “Complex Collaborative Task”Collaborative Task”Co abo a e asCo abo a e as

How Complex Is the Collaborative Task?How Complex Is the Collaborative Task?__ The task is unlikely to be accomplished __ The task is unlikely to be accomplished successfully using only the skills within thesuccessfully using only the skills within the

Eight Factors That Lead to Eight Factors That Lead to SuccessSuccess

successfully using only the skills within the successfully using only the skills within the team.team.__ The task must be addressed by a new __ The task must be addressed by a new group formed specifically for this purpose.group formed specifically for this purpose.__ The task requires collective input from __ The task requires collective input from

1.1. Investing in signature Investing in signature relationship practicesrelationship practices

2.2. Modeling collaborative behaviorModeling collaborative behaviorq pq phighly specialized individuals.highly specialized individuals.__ The task requires collective input and __ The task requires collective input and agreement from more than 20 people.agreement from more than 20 people.__ The members of the team working on __ The members of the team working on the task are in more than two locationsthe task are in more than two locations

gg3.3. Creating a “gift culture”Creating a “gift culture”4.4. Ensuring the requisite skillsEnsuring the requisite skills55 Supporting a strong sense ofSupporting a strong sense ofthe task are in more than two locations.the task are in more than two locations.

__ The success of the task is highly __ The success of the task is highly dependent on understanding preferences or dependent on understanding preferences or needs of individuals outside the group.needs of individuals outside the group.__ The outcome of the task will be __ The outcome of the task will be

fl d b h h hlfl d b h h hl

5.5. Supporting a strong sense of Supporting a strong sense of communitycommunity

6.6. Assigning team leaders that are Assigning team leaders that are both taskboth task-- and relationshipand relationship--influenced by events that are highly influenced by events that are highly

uncertain and difficult to predict.uncertain and difficult to predict.__ The task must be completed under __ The task must be completed under extreme time pressure.extreme time pressure.If more than two of these statements areIf more than two of these statements are

both taskboth task and relationshipand relationshiporiented oriented

7.7. Building on heritage relationshipsBuilding on heritage relationships88 Understanding role clarity andUnderstanding role clarity andIf more than two of these statements are If more than two of these statements are

true, the task requires complex true, the task requires complex collaboration. collaboration.

8.8. Understanding role clarity and Understanding role clarity and task ambiguitytask ambiguity

Ref: “Eight Ways to Build Collaborative Teams”, Gratton and Erickson, Harvard Business Review, Nov 2007

Page 28: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

What needs to change for us What needs to change for us to win (succeed)? to win (succeed)?

N ti l H lth IT St t f A t liN ti l H lth IT St t f A t liNational Health IT Strategy for Australia National Health IT Strategy for Australia 10+ year10+ yearF di i t b th St t dF di i t b th St t dFunding increase at both State and Funding increase at both State and Federal levels with joint responsibilityFederal levels with joint responsibilityB h i l h lth tB h i l h lth tBehave as single health systemBehave as single health system

Create seamless processes across care settingsCreate seamless processes across care settingsO l ibl ith IT tO l ibl ith IT tOnly possible with IT support Only possible with IT support

ActActYo e the mo t iti l d i e of h nge inYo e the mo t iti l d i e of h nge inYou are the most critical drivers of change in You are the most critical drivers of change in healthcare information technologyhealthcare information technologyWe need you on our team!!!We need you on our team!!!yy

Page 29: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

The Ashes V2 0The Ashes V2 0The Ashes V2.0The Ashes V2.0

ENGLISH HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGYINFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

2015

Page 30: ee--Health: Australia vs Health: Australia vs England 2015 · 2018. 4. 2. · England: 48.1% 50 60 Australia: 100.0% Assuming flat GDP 30 40 England Australia 0 10 20 Life Expectancy

Q ti ?Q ti ?Questions?Questions?

Thank youThank you

My contact details:My contact details:Paul WillmaPaul Willma

[email protected]@cerner.com