educator evaluation and support system basics. oregon framework for teacher and administrator...
TRANSCRIPT
Educator Evaluation and Support System
Basics
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator
Evaluation and Support SystemsAlignment of State and Federal Requirements
Guides implementation of aligned state &
federal requirements
Guides implementation of aligned state &
federal requirements
The Oregon Framework incorporates SB290 and federal requirements
HB 2186 in 2015 session added charter schools
OAR 581-022-1723
Purpose of an Evaluation & Support System
• Improve instructional, professional and leadership practices
• Engage every educator as an active participant in their evaluation
• Ensure the process promotes collaboration and continuous learning
• Improve student growth and prepare students for College, Careers and Citizenship
Vision and Principles of a Quality System
Vision: This is a transformative professional growth system Values have shifted from just making contract
renewal decisions to elevating leading, teaching and learning
To nurture a culture of continuous improvement and growth by including formative assessment & support
To create alignment between evaluation and professional learning that adds value to the system
Oregon Framework Required Elements
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)Standards
of Professional Practice
Differentiated
Performance Levels:
4 Levels
Multiple Measure
s
Evaluation and
Professional Growth
Cycle
Aligned Profession
al Learning
• Elements must be included in all teacher and administrator evaluation and support systems:
•Must align to requirements, but flexibility in local design
TeachersTeachers AdministratorsAdministrators
Model Core Teaching Standards (InTASC)oFour Domains/10 Standards:
1. The Learner and Learning
2. Content3. Instructional Practice4. Professional
Responsibility
Educational Leadership/Administrator Standards (ISLLC)
Six Domains:1. Visionary Leadership2. Instructional
Improvement3. Effective Management4. Inclusive Practice5. Ethical Leadership6. Socio-Political Context
Standards of Professional Practice
Differentiated Performance Levels
Performance evaluated on the Standards of Professional Practice on 4 levels Level 1 – Does not meet standards Level 2 – Making progress toward
standards Level 3 – Meets standards Level 4 – Exceeds standards
Proficient
Multiple Measures
Evidence of the quality of teachers’ planning, delivery of instruction, and assessment of student learning
Evidence of progress toward professional goals or contribution to school or district goals
Evidence of educators’ contributions to student learning
Collaborative Student Learning and Growth Goal Setting Process: Teachers and administrators collaborate with
supervisors/evaluators to establish at least two student learning and growth goals
Discuss rigor and rationale of each goal, research-based strategies, professional learning needed to support goal attainment
Meet and discuss progress mid-year and at end of year
Reflect on results and determine implications for professional growth path and summative evaluation
www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3836
Multiple Measures: Student Learning & Growth
Category Types of Measures
1 Oregon’s state assessments that must be used to meet ESEA Waiver requirements•SMARTER Balanced
• Grades 4-8 in English language arts and mathematics•OAKS Extended Assessments1
• Grades 4-8 in English language arts and mathematics
2 Additional Statewide Assessments•Science Assessment•Social Sciences Assessment•ELPA Other Assessments (School-wide or district-wide)•Commercially developed assessments that include pre- and post-measures •Locally developed assessments that include pre- and post-measures •Results from proficiency-based assessment systems •Locally-developed collections of evidence, i.e. portfolios of student work that include multiple types of performance
Multiple Measures: Student Learning & Growth
1Used by special education teachers who provide instruction in ELA or math for those students who take extended assessments
Factors in Summative Effectiveness Rating
Determining a Final Score: Oregon Matrix
Y-
Axi
s: PP
/ P
R
LEVEL 4
Collegial
*SLG Inquiry
3
Facilitative or
Collegial
* SLG Inquiry
3 or 4
Facilitative
4
Facilitative
4
LEVEL 3
Collegial or Consulting
*SLG Inquiry
2 or 3
Collegial
3
Collegial
3
Collegial
3
LEVEL 2
Consulting
2
Consulting
2
Consulting
2
Collegial or Consulting
* PP/PR Inquiry
2 or 3
LEVEL 1
Directed
1
Directed
1
Consulting or
Directed
* PP/PR Inquiry
1 or 2
Consulting
* PP/PR Inquiry
2
LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3
LEVEL 4
X-Axis: SLG
*Inquiry Process
Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle
Educator conducts an
assessment of practice against
performance standards
Culmination of multiple
formative observations, reflections, professional
conversations
Educator and evaluator review progress toward
goals and/or performance
against standards
Educator strategically
identifies professional practice and
student learning goals
Educator and evaluator collect evidence using
multiple measures
Aligned Professional Learning
Evaluation aligned with high quality professional development opportunities Relevant to educator’s goals and needs Informs decisions for professional growth
Standards for Professional Learning
http://www.learningforward.org/standards
Dates Activities
July 2012 ESEA Waiver conditionally approved; State Board endorsed Oregon Framework
2012-13 Pilot framework and student growth models in 14 school districts
All districts develop or align local evaluation & support systems; ODE regional support
Spring 2013 ODE resubmit amended evaluation guidelines for USED approval
By July 1, 2013 All districts submit revised evaluation systems assurances and implementation plan to ODE for approval
By Sept 1, 2013
ODE review and approve district evaluation systems/assurances; identify technical assistance/professional development needs
2013-14 All districts implement initial plans for local systems for all evaluations; districts will refine their systems; ODE regional support
2014-15 All districts continue implementing local systems; ODE regional support
By July 1, 2015 Districts present local evaluation system to Regional Peer Panel
2015-16 & beyond
Continuous improvement of evaluation systems and regional support
Historical Background
http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id=3759
District ModelsRecommended RubricsStudent Learning and Growth GoalsOregon MatrixStudent Growth Percentiles
Educator Effectiveness Toolkit