Educational Master Plan Data

Associated Students of Foothill College (ASFC)May 28, 2015

E. KuoFH IR&P

 

• Review EMP process• Review internal and external scan data

– Data about students– Data about community – This is overview data—at the 30,000 ft level

Overview

2

There is an Educational Master Plan website!http://foothill.edu/president/parc/esmp.php

3

 Ed Master Plan TimelineIdentify scope of work

Secure consultants

EMP Steering Committee

Community Interviews

Online input

Campus interviews (including prep)

Town Hall (including organization)

Webinar (including prep)

Environmental scan review (Including prep)

All-day retreat (including prep)

Feedback period

Finalize institutional goals

Draft with institutional goals

Opening day

Review draft (shared governance feedback)

Editing

Submit for board approval

11/1 12/16 1/30 3/16 4/30 6/14 7/29 9/12 10/27 12/11

18

144

287

28

9

37

9

35

23

13

10

21

81

137

42

44

7

 

Internal Scan

4

 How many students do we serve?

5

In Fall 2014

In Fall 2010

13,000

15,000

11,000

 How many students do we serve?

6

In Fall 2014

In Fall 2010

13,000

15,000

11,000

Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

 How many students do we serve?

7

In Fall 2014

In Fall 2010

13,000

15,000

11,000

17,000

18,000

19,000

 How many students do we serve?

8

In Fall 2014

In Fall 2010

13,000

15,000

11,000

17,000

18,000

19,000

Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]

 

• Declining trend in headcount and FTES • Impact of repeatability

Enrollment

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15*0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000

Foothill CollegeFall Headcount Enrollment and Fiscal Year FTES

Headcount FTES

Note: 2014-15 FTES is estimated based on P1 report..

FHDA IR&P, ODA

 Online Course Enrollment

10

What does the trend line suggest?Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query]

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Foothill CollegeOnline Enrollment

Fall Quarters 2010 to 2014

 

• Increasing trend of full-time enrollment

Enrollment

2010 2011 2012 2013 20140%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Foothill CollegeFall Enrollment by Full-Time and Part-Time Status

Full-time Part-time

FHDA IR&P, ODS

 

• Increasing African Americans and Latino/as• F1 headcount increase by 27% (F10 to F14)

Enrollment

African American

Asian Filipino/PI Latino/a Native American

White Other/Unk0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

50%

Foothill CollegeFall Headcount by Ethnicity

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Note: Multi-Ethnic was only reported in 2009 and 2010 and is included in Other/Unk for consistency.

CCCCO Datamart

 International Students

13

China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan and South Korea represent top five—795 in Fall 2014

946

1,117 1,1311,203

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall2013 Fall 2014

Foothill CollegeInternational Students with F1 Visa Status

Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Open Doors]

 Are they successful?

14

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Fall 2013 Fall 2014

Foothill CollegeCourse Success by Instructional Method

Not online Online

Source: CCCCO Data Mart [Retention/Success Rate query]

What’s the success gap between online and not online courses?

In Fall 2014: 9%In Fall 2010: 18%

15

 Are they successful?What’s the course success gap by ethnicity?

In Fall 2014: 21%

In Fall 2010: 17%

Where is the greatest gap?

Asians and African Americans

 Graduation 

16

162

363

574

496535

459

579 592 602

708

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2009-10 2010-11 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014

Foothill College Certificates and Degrees Awarded

Certificate Associate Degree

Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Program Review/Degrees]

 

• Asians earn more certificates compared to others• Whites earn more degrees compared to others

Graduation

African American

Asian/F/PI Hispanic White Native American

Other/Unkn

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

8

261

61

167

137

20

204

132

317

530

Foothill College2013-14 Certificates and Degrees by Ethnicity

Certificate Degree

CCCCO Datamart

 

• CSU and UC transfers suggest increasing trend, but leveling off? Comparisons to other colleges?

Transfer

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-140

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Foothill CollegeTransfers to Four-Year Institutions

UC CSU ISP/OoS

CCCCO Datamart, UCOP, CSU Analytics

 

• UC system– Davis, Los Angeles, San Diego

• CSU system– San Jose, San Francisco, East Bay

• In-state privates– University of San Francisco, Santa Clara University,

University of Southern California• Out-of-State

– Carnegie Mellon, New York University, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Arizona State University, Cornell University Endowed Colleges

Top Transfer Destinations

What’s your

guess?

19

CCCCO Datamart, UCOP, CSU Analytics

Let’s have a conversation!

 

• Seven sessions (April 13, 2015)• Train for a supportive workforce

– For high-tech industry and related businesses– Small business development

• Professional development for students– Soft Skills (key for workforce)– Internships

• Increase collaboration/partnerships• Role of lifelong education

Community Interviews

 

• 25 sessions and 129 participants – April 28 & 29, 2015

• One webinar– May 6, 2015

• Top themes:– College Collaboration– Student Services– Planning– Equity and Diversity

Campus Interviews

22

23

 

• Asking for feedback about Foothill strengths, areas for improvement, future goals– April 27, 2015 to May 8, 2015

• 124 respondents– 103 students (83%)– 1 Administrator (1%)– 9 Classified staff (7%)– 7 Full-time faculty (6%)– 4 Part-time faculty (3%)

Online Input

24

 

• Foothill strengths#1: Affordability (51%)#2: Teaching #3: Transfer function #4: Instructional programs #5: Commitment to students #6: Curriculum #7: Online education

Online Input

25

 

• Foothill areas for improvement#1: Instructional programs (29%)#2: Campus Communication #2: Career/Workforce prep/enhancement#4: Community relations/partners#5: Shared governance #6: Use of technology

Online Input

26

 

• Foothill initiatives and goals#1: Improve outcomes among all students (38%)#2: Improve opportunities for professional dev.#3: Improve agility to address changing

employment and economic conditions #4: Supporting instruction and services to

traditionally underserved #5: Expand outreach/recruitment including to

traditionally underserved #6: Increase sense of community involvement/engagement

Online Input

27

 

External Scan

28

 Are our students representative?

2%

34%

25%

0%

37%

6%

34%

24%

1%

35%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

African American Asian/Filipino/PI Latino/a Native American White

Foothill CollegeSanta Clara County Adult Population and

Foothill Students by Ethnicity

2014 Santa Clara Population Foothill Fall 2014 HeadcountM

Source: FHDA IR&P, ODS [Fall Factsheet]CA Dept of Finance [P-3 report]

29

 

• Income gap (median household)– Silicon Valley: $94,534– California: $61,320

• Housing/rental prices– Median home sale price: $757,585– California median: $397,585– Average rental rate: $2,333/month

• Poverty (per federal poverty thresholds)– Silicon Valley: 11%– 10 Years ago: ~9%– About 25% of total reside in Santa Clara County

Cost of Living

Source: Joint Venture [Silicon Valley Index 2015]Silicon Valley Institute for Regional Studies [Poverty in the San Francisco Bay Area, 2015]

Median household income is based on 2013 figures.2013 Federal poverty thresholds: $11,490 for single household; $23,550 for a family of four

30

 

Next Steps: Identifying Goals

 

• The draft goals were identified as part of an all-day meeting (May 13).

• 15 proposed goals will be narrowed down to between 3 to 5.

• Open Forum: Thursday, June 4th, 11 am-noon (Toyon Room)

• Online feedback through June 12th: http://irp.fhda.edu/cgi-bin/rws5.pl?FORM=EMPinput

Proposed Goals and Feedback

32

 

Questions? Comments?Thanks for your time!