editorial comment

1
for the initial management of prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2004; 19: 146. 16. Underwood W 3rd, Demonner S, Ubel P, Fagerlin A, Sanda M and Wei J: Racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment of localized/regional prostate cancer. J Urol 2004; 171: 1504. 17. Williams ML, Hill G and Jackson M: The impact of an acute myocardial infarction guideline and pathway on racial out- comes at a university hospital. Ethn Dis 2006; 16: 653. 18. Owen WF Jr, Szczech LA and Frankenfield DL: Healthcare system interventions for inequality in quality: corrective action through evidence-based medicine. J Natl Med Assoc 2002; 94: 83S. 19. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA et al: Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or inter- stitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998; 280: 969. 20. Carlin B and Andriole G: The natural history, skeletal compli- cations and management of bone metastases in patients with prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88: 2989. EDITORIAL COMMENT Similar to other published data 1 using the SEER registry, during this era (1991 to 1999) fewer black patients under- went definitive therapy than their white counterparts. When staging bone scan was not indicated, there was a decrease in the number of bone scans ordered by 13.5% and 19.1% in black and white patients, respectively, after the guidelines were published. When staging bone scan was indicated, the test was ordered more commonly in white than in black patients (83.7% vs 74.5%) before guideline publication but no statistically significant difference was noted after the guidelines were published (74.5% vs 73.8%). Interestingly this decrease in racial disparities in staging test use is not because more bone scans were ordered for black patients, but because fewer were ordered for white patients. These authors suggest that the difference in pros- tate cancer survival outcomes is not due to disparities in staging test use. Tracy M. Downs Department of Surgery (Urology) University of California, San Diego Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System San Diego, California 1. Underwood W III, Jackson J, Wei JT, Dunn R, Baker B, DeMonner S and Wood DP: Racial treatment trends in localized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992–1999. Cancer 2005; 103: 538. DECREASED RACIAL DISPARITIES IN PROSTATE CANCER STAGING 87

Upload: tracy-m

Post on 01-Jan-2017

212 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

for the initial management of prostate cancer. J Gen InternMed 2004; 19: 146.

16. Underwood W 3rd, Demonner S, Ubel P, Fagerlin A, Sanda Mand Wei J: Racial/ethnic disparities in the treatment oflocalized/regional prostate cancer. J Urol 2004; 171: 1504.

17. Williams ML, Hill G and Jackson M: The impact of an acutemyocardial infarction guideline and pathway on racial out-comes at a university hospital. Ethn Dis 2006; 16: 653.

18. Owen WF Jr, Szczech LA and Frankenfield DL: Healthcaresystem interventions for inequality in quality: correctiveaction through evidence-based medicine. J Natl Med Assoc2002; 94: 83S.

19. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, BlankK, Broderick GA et al: Biochemical outcome after radicalprostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or inter-stitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostatecancer. JAMA 1998; 280: 969.

20. Carlin B and Andriole G: The natural history, skeletal compli-cations and management of bone metastases in patientswith prostate carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88: 2989.

EDITORIAL COMMENT

Similar to other published data1 using the SEER registry,during this era (1991 to 1999) fewer black patients under-went definitive therapy than their white counterparts.

When staging bone scan was not indicated, there was adecrease in the number of bone scans ordered by 13.5% and19.1% in black and white patients, respectively, after theguidelines were published. When staging bone scan wasindicated, the test was ordered more commonly in whitethan in black patients (83.7% vs 74.5%) before guidelinepublication but no statistically significant difference wasnoted after the guidelines were published (74.5% vs 73.8%).Interestingly this decrease in racial disparities in stagingtest use is not because more bone scans were ordered forblack patients, but because fewer were ordered for whitepatients. These authors suggest that the difference in pros-tate cancer survival outcomes is not due to disparities instaging test use.

Tracy M. DownsDepartment of Surgery (Urology)

University of California, San DiegoVeterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System

San Diego, California

1. Underwood W III, Jackson J, Wei JT, Dunn R, Baker B,DeMonner S and Wood DP: Racial treatment trends inlocalized/regional prostate carcinoma: 1992–1999. Cancer2005; 103: 538.

DECREASED RACIAL DISPARITIES IN PROSTATE CANCER STAGING 87