edinburgh research explorer a hermeneutic phenomenological
TRANSCRIPT
Edinburgh Research Explorer
A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experiencehealth practitioners have when working with families tosafeguard children and the invisibility of the emotions workinvolved
Citation for published version:Taylor, J, Smith, P & Taylor, J 2017, 'A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experiencehealth practitioners have when working with families to safeguard children and the invisibility of theemotions work involved', Journal of Clinical Nursing, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 557-567.https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13486
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.1111/jocn.13486
Link:Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer
Document Version:Peer reviewed version
Published In:Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher Rights Statement:This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Taylor, J., Smith, P., & Taylor, J. (2016). A hermeneuticphenomenological study exploring the experience health practitioners have when working with families tosafeguard children and the invisibility of the emotions work involved. Journal of Clinical Nursing., which has beenpublished in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13486. This article may be used for non-commercialpurposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
General rightsCopyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s)and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise andabide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
Take down policyThe University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorercontent complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright pleasecontact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately andinvestigate your claim.
Download date: 02. Nov. 2021
1 | Page
Citation: Taylor, J., Smith, P., Taylor, J. (2016) A hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experience health practitioners have when working with families to safeguard children and the invisibility of the emotions work involved. Journal of Clinical Nursing, doi: 10.1111/jocn.1.3486 Abstract
Aim and objective
To explore the emotions work undertaken by practitioners with responsibility for the
safeguarding of child wellbeing and establish whether there is a relationship between
emotion work, role visibility, professional wellbeing and effectiveness of supportive
frameworks.
Background
Protecting children is the responsibility of everyone in society with health, social care and
public health services leading this worldwide. To safeguard children effectively it is known
that practitioners build relationships with families in sometimes challenging situations which
involve the management of emotions. However irrespective of this current knowledge;
health practitioners who work in this area suggest that their child safeguarding role is not
recognised, respected or valued in professional and societal settings. The purpose of this
paper is to report on a qualitative study which set out to explore the relationship between the
known relational based emotions work of practitioners’ and the reported lack of visibility.
Methods
Hermeneutic phenomenology underpinned the study. Semi-structured interviews were
employed for data collection. Ten participants actively working with pre-school children and
families in health care organisations.were recruited.
Results
The emotional, relationship and communicative based work crucial to effectively safeguard
children may influence the visibility of the role. Poor role visibility influences the morale of
practitioners and the support they receive.
Conclusion
2 | Page
In conclusion this study proposes that when there is poor role recognition; there is ineffective
clinical support. This reduces professional wellbeing which in turn will impact practitioner
abilities to safeguard children.
Relevance to clinical practice
This study highlights that in order to sustain safe and effective health and social care
practice, organisational leads require an understanding of the impact emotional, relational
based work can have on practitioners and provide supportive frameworks that will effectively
promote professional wellbeing.
Key Words
health visitor, health visiting, emotional labour, emotion work, professional resilience, stress,
child protection, safeguarding
Summary Box
What does this paper contribute to the wider community?
The internal management of emotions in the work place is poorly recognised and under-
valued
Poor understanding of emotion based work by managers and wider colleague groups in any
health and social care setting will prevent the development and implementation of effective
support and supervision frameworks which in turn will influence service quality
Main Document
INTRODUCTION
Promoting and improving the health, development and wellbeing of children, young people
and their families is of global importance for the survival of countries and communities
(United Nations 2010). This vision has been adopted politically throughout the United
Kingdom (UK) with the specialist nursing profession of health visiting viewed as one of the
3 | Page
main services pivotal to its progression. Health visiting services are utilised differently
throughout the UK (Hogg et al 2012), however at its core, the health visiting profession has a
remit to deliver fundamental universal structures to promote public health; with the notion
that by implementing effective support from birth, children, young people and their families
will be protected and positively enabled to contribute back into communities (NMC 2004,
Royal College of Nursing [RCN] 2011, Scottish Government 2012, DOH&PH England 2013,
Welsh Government 2013, DOHSS&PS Northern Ireland 2014).
The centrality of the health visiting service in promoting this political aim has resulted from a
longstanding history of health visitors universally and compassionately supporting individuals
and communities to safeguard pre-school children (Davies 1988, Luker et al 2012, Smith &
Horne 2012). However the role, although recently gaining prominence in public health and
child protection arenas (Laming 2009), is not always visible in other quarters (Appleton
2011, Robinson 2012, Peckover 2013).
This paper reports on a study exploring the emotion work of the health visitor (HV) in child
care and protection. The study offers insight into the influence emotion work may have on
the visibility of the role and explores the impact a lack of role recognition may have on
professional supportive infrastructures. To do this the paper will provide information about
the background to the study as well as an overview of the analysed results. It will then offer
a discussion in the context of current emotion based literature, arguing that undervalued and
unrecognised emotion work can influence practitioner wellbeing.
BACKGROUND
Interest in this topic originated from experience of working in health and social care practice
and education. As observed, on the one hand senior student nurses question what learning
benefits they gain when allocated a practice placement with a HV because ‘they just weigh
babies and chat’. On the other hand HVs offer concerns about working with intensive,
4 | Page
unpredictable workloads with inter-professional teams that appear to lack knowledge about
their role. Such anecdotal findings chime with UK wide HV perceptions of: poor role
recognition, limited professional support, emotional capacity issues, increasing
dissatisfaction and feelings of anxiety, ‘burn out’ and ‘stress’ (Wallbank and Hatton 2011,
page 11, Mackintosh 2011).
The aim of this study was threefold: firstly it aimed to establish whether there was a
relationship between the communicative role and emotion work of the HV and the lack of
role visibility reported, secondly it intended to identify what impact this has on the groups
reported professional wellbeing and thirdly to understand if this had an influence on the
support they receive.
One driver of the study was the concern that if practitioners feel stressed undertaking a role
they perceive as unrecognised, undervalued and poorly supported, surely this increases a
potential for risk within children and family health services (Wallbank & Hatton 2011).
Although there is little direct evidence in research literature to support this conjecture, it was
felt that given the collective indications of long-term stress as detailed below and the
knowledge that such symptoms can influence the overall wellbeing of a person’s cognitive
ability and performance, it is a real concern warranting study.
Collective symptoms of stress:
the response of a person who feels they are in a threatening or difficult situation…associated
with physical and psychological factors including anxiety, headaches, recurrent fatigue,
depression, reduced self-esteem, poor concentration. . .emotional exhaustion, a decreased
sensitivity to rewards and a withdrawal from decision making. . .. manifesting as a lack of
involvement with, or sympathy or respect for, colleagues and clients. . .
(Brooker & Nicol 2011,over pages 522–524)
5 | Page
Health Visiting
A review of focused literature confirms that the HV role is founded on communication and
professional relationship building (Appleton & Cowley 2008, Robinson 2012, Peckover
2013). Such characteristics are deemed crucial for the recognised sensitive but challenging
aspects of the role in relation to the assessment and interventions required to potentially
address behavior change and parenting with the aim of ensuring child wellbeing. However
although the importance of these individual activities is recognised, there is limited evidence
about the collective influence this work has on the professional and emotional wellbeing of
the practitioner. According to Davies (1988) and Smith (1992, 2012) psychosocial; caring;
relationship dependent and emotion management elements of work are often poorly
recognised and significantly undervalued in the workplace. These findings were utilised to
underpin the study.
The research question was: How do HVs experience and manage their emotions when
working with families to safeguard children? As a theoretical framework for the study, the
main concepts from Hochschild’s research into the ‘emotional labour’ (EL) of employees was
utilised (Hochschild 1983, page 7). Hochschild’s research suggests that people in paid work
environments use internal emotion management systems to disguise internal feelings for
external purposes and financial gain. She suggests that these processes are rarely openly
recognised but are needed by employees if they are to manage emotions effectively to meet
employer expectations in emotionally challenging situations. She coined the phrase EL to
explain the challenges that such internal efforts have on an individual. The current study
was designed to test Hochschild’s theories in the context of health visiting.
The study was also cognisant of the theoretical work of nurse academics that have been
influential in the transference of Hochschild’s findings into nursing knowledge. Each of the
studies utilised illustrate that nurses work with complex emotion. This emotion is either felt
personally or is expressed by others when relationships are built or therapeutic interventions
6 | Page
are being implemented (Gray & Smith 2009, Theodosius 2008, Smith 1992, 2012). It was
not the aim of this study to replicate these studies undertaken with nurses however the
health visiting study was designed with their findings as a guide.
STUDY DESIGN
Hermeneutic phenomenology, as influenced by Heidegger, was adopted as the most
suitable methodological approach for this study. Its adoption was aimed at uncovering data
about both the obvious and ambiguous experiences of health visitors (Braun & Clarke 2006).
The methodological choice for the study was influenced by the recognised collective expert
knowledge the research team had. This was acknowledged as a double edged sword which
could present advantages or disadvantages to the study (Kanuha 2000). Adopting
Heidegger’s philosophical approach to phenomenology, the research team was enabled to
utilise their knowledge base as an asset instead of ignoring it as other traditional
phenomenological approaches dictate (Connelly 2015). The recognised flexibility of the
methodology (Robinson 2002) permitted a reflective governance process to be used during
data collection which ensured the explicit exploration of data and not the assumed as pre
knowledge can precipitate (Pringle et al 2011). In addition, taking advantage of pre-
understanding of the current context of health visiting, emotion work and child protection
ensured the most contemporary political, organisational and theoretical milieu was
considered during analysis (Alvesson & Skoldberg 2009, Connelly 2015).
Sample
The target study population were experienced HVs currently managing a caseload of pre-
school children within two Health Boards in Scotland. Ten volunteer participants were
recruited from those who responded to advertising flyers. Any volunteers known personally
by the researcher or registered HVs not active in caseload were excluded.
7 | Page
The sample comprised all white Scottish women, aged between 35 – 60 years who had from
seven to thirty years’ HV experience. No male HVs volunteered. The demographic of the
sample was representative of the UK health visiting workforce that comprises 99% female
HVs (DOH 2010, Information Statistic Division [ISD] 2014). The national age cluster of the
general nursing and midwifery workforce employed by the NHS is 25 – 60 years (ISD 2014)
and the majority (83%) of the workforce are recorded as white (NMC 2011).
Ethical approval
Recruitment and engagement processes were authorised by Research and Development
Units as part of an established research governance process (Scottish Executive Health
Department 2006). Ethical approval was obtained from an academic committee. All
participants gave informed consent and were permitted to withdraw at any time without
concern of consequence.
Method
In-depth semi-structured interviews were used to generate data. The interviews were
approximately one hour long and were aimed at enabling participants to explore the
complexities and sensitivities of their work (Scherer et al 2001). All interviews were
recorded and transcribed verbatim. Two introductory questions were used: What aspect of
your role do you find the most emotionally challenging? How do you manage the emotions
felt during these challenging times? Other questions were guided by the information shared
by the participant.
Analysis
In line with an interpretative approach to phenomenology, transcriptions from each interview
were read, re-read and independently considered (Pringle et al 2011). This led to thematic
patterns being deduced as guided by the theoretical framework utilised for the study (Braun
& Clarke 2006). Using a circular approach (Alvesson & Skoldberg 2009); the verbatim
8 | Page
statements were initially aligned to approximately 30 emergent themes which included:
‘emotions felt’, ‘professional confidence’, ‘organisational expectations’, ‘case complexity’,
‘awareness and support’. The process of interpretation and analysis continually reduced the
number of headings that in the context of the literature and the comparative relationship of
the data led to two main themes being identified: emotion challenges and emotion
management.
Quality Governance
For the purpose of the study the principles of rigour and trustworthiness in qualitative
research as proposed by Guba and Lincoln (1989) were adopted as good practice
(Higginbottom et al 2013). Although Guba and Lincoln's approach has been criticized in
some quarters (Sandelowski 1999) it was employed based on the extensive support it has in
others (Robson 2002, Farley & McLafferty 2003, Burns & Grove 2009, Streubert-Speziale &
Carpenter 2011). Adopting the principles of Guba and Lincoln has ensured that rigour was
considered in terms of credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability.
To ensure the credibility of the data every endeavor was made to report it accurately. As
guided by Guba and Lincoln this was achieved in six main ways which included: having
contact with the study context for the length of the study, being open and transparent with all
participants about the researchers past experience, carrying out “peer debriefing” (p. 237)
and “member checks” (p. 238) which involved peers and participants in the review of the
data collected. It also involved the researcher engaging reflective processes which were
undertaken and recorded to ensure the accuracy of the report and analysis.
According to Guba and Lincoln (1989) the transferability of a qualitative study is out of the
control of the researcher. However a detailed account of the data and the study design has
been recorded to assist others in the replication of the study which supports the notion of
transferability. To support this and to ensure the dependability and confirmability of the
9 | Page
study, data provided in this paper is an accurate account of the perceived situation for HVs
when it was collected. These findings therefore should remain stable and relevant to the
profession.
FINDINGS
Table 1, Themes
Throughout the interviews the researcher’s field notes reflected that participants were able to
articulate the complexity of their work and were open about their feelings and actions it
generated. The ease with which participants shared their feelings varied. Some were more
naturally prone to explain how they were thinking within situations rather than feeling.
Questioning facilitated an exploration of feelings and uncovered the themes and subthemes
as highlighted in table 1
Emotion Challenges
Participants reported that they regularly engage with situations that involve emotion and
present emotional challenges. When examined collectively the most challenging emotions
were felt when working with families, partner professionals and with managers.
With families
Theme Emotion Challenges Emotion Management Finding Sub themes
With families
With partner agencies and managers
Professional relationship
Support
Discussion sub themes
Hidden Labour
Impact of undervalued emotion work
Infrastructures of support
10 | Page
The majority of participants reported how challenging they find working therapeutically with
families to influence behaviour change in a child-centred way. This was particularly true
when working within households where family members have competing demands, such as
those affected by mental illness, addiction, homelessness and poverty.
In each interview, examples of challenge were readily offered and participants stated that
hearing their work reduced to tangible tasks, such as measuring a child’s growth or
assessing their development, was ‘professionally belittling’ with no consideration given to the
emotional investment that engaging a family in complex, holistic, psychosocial assessments
or interventions requires.
Each participant illustrated that the complexity of their role has grown over the years. They
suggested that this is due to the unique universality of their service which is provided to each
child born in the UK until the age of 5 years, irrespective of socioeconomic background or
history. As such they work with both children and the majority of the population of child
bearing age. In this position they, and midwives, are often the first people to identify
concern with an adult’s behavior as it relates to the current or future care of a pre-school
child. On the whole participants reported that they can find this emotionally challenging,
however at the same time they feel they have learned to cope with it as an expected part of
their job:
“….I’ve been doing this since I was 17 (years old), working as a nurse for a long time
and I’ve had to deal with people’s emotions and feelings all my life as part of my job
and it’s something that you have to learn to deal with, you just get on with it…it
becomes kind of second nature….”(p2)
What they found more challenging is the feeling of professional isolation that can occur. As
a universal service they are often expected to manage complex issues alone. This tends to
11 | Page
occur when concerns within a family are difficult to define in terms that relate to admission
criteria set by specialist services. One practitioner explained what it was like to work with
one very challenging client with volatile moods and behaviour reflective of personality
disorder:
“….they’ve (parents) never seen a psychiatrist, very seldom seen a GP (General
Practitioner), but their manipulative behaviour and the way they present is very, very
difficult and these have been the ones I have had difficulty getting social work
involved because they can present as coping….”(p1)
With partner agencies and managers Throughout the interviews professional isolation and a lack of recognition from partner
agencies and line managers presented challenges for which HVs were less prepared for
than those presented by families. All practitioners reported times when they felt
professionally undermined and prevented from arranging effective interventions for children.
This occurred when the child’s requirements were beyond the HVs scope of expertise and
referral information was not accepted by specialists:
“….sometimes the frustration around having experience and insight and the ability to
assess the situation in a family and perhaps not being listened to by Social Work.
That our experience and input is sometimes dismissed if it (our assessment findings)
does not fit the criteria (for admission)…”(p5)
Similarly participants report that they find it difficult to work with managers when there
appears to be a lack of recognition about the complexity or the emotional pressures
impacting on their role. Comparable to the encounters with partner agencies, HVs find
dealing with managers challenging as they believe they can present obstacles to care
delivery:
12 | Page
“…. trying to maintain the standards that you set for yourself professionally and
personally in the face of staff shortages, lack of leadership and working with people
(managers) who don’t understand your role…”(p3)
Participants were open about the stress and fear they feel when their work expectations
become overwhelming:
“...you can’t get on top of things, you fall behind and that becomes more stressful.
You don’t get your paperwork done which is quite stressful because you need
to…”(p4)
In each work based scenario offered, all participants were aware of their emotions and
described a range of feelings. The main words used were, ‘anger, frustration, sadness, fear
and happiness’. Negative feelings tended to be related to situations involving managerial
discussions about workload as well as those concerning parental behaviours. However,
there was a sense of positivity when change for the wellbeing of children was evident e.g.
when difficult child protection case decisions appear to result in an observable improvement
to a child’s health and wellbeing.
Emotion Management
Throughout the interviews participants were open about the feelings they experienced when
at work, however they disclosed that they did not always express these emotions readily in
the workplace. When questioned why they managed their emotion to prevent expression;
participants reported that they do this to promote professional relationships with families for
the purpose of intervening therapeutically and to sustain a professional image:
“You would never go into a family and be angry but you would come out being really
annoyed….you can't do anything about it…., that's unprofessional….”(p4)
13 | Page
“…you do feel it internally but….I don't think that would really get you anywhere being
angry with someone… I think we try all ways round, sometimes you can try a bit of
humour,…not make a joke of it, but try and…make it a wee bit more upbeat…to
maybe try and change things….you know like some people I could go into and think
there's absolutely no way, if I say the one thing out of line I will be put out of the
house….”(p2)
Professional relationships
To sustain relationships, HVs believed that they have to take a “measured approach” in how
they expressed their internal emotions with families. They report that this supports them to
manage their emotions to prevent over involvement and to uphold the purpose of their role:
“….you have to keep your emotions in check to remain professional and to
remain…objective….having a balance between caring for a family and caring about
the welfare of a child, but also then not getting too emotionally involved as well.”(p10)
This quote aligns with the findings from all participants who reported they manage their
emotions with the aim of working effectively with families by displaying empathy and
compassion whilst at the same time working hard to ensure that the understanding they
have for a family’s situation, or the negative emotions they feel towards the adults within the
household, does not interfere with the child-centred requirements of their work.
To manage emotions for these purposes each participant stated that they are able to do this
through the development of personal strategies. These are established through experience,
learning and education and by having supportive colleagues. HVs reported that how they
manage their emotions is dependent on the situation.
14 | Page
Support
The majority admitted that in relation to work challenges they were more inclined to express
feelings of frustration and anger openly and directly to managers and inter-professional
colleagues (within the scope of organisational dignity at work policies); whereas families
were, on the whole, exposed to professionally expressed emotions. Participants described
that true feelings of anger, frustration and sadness are contained during family contacts and
only expressed remotely. Remote expression would include: crying in their car and
engaging in independent and facilitated reflection with supportive colleagues in their office.
All participants reported that they depend on these activities to remain professionally safe
and to prevent stress.
Every participant in the study received formal clinical supervision facilitated by their
employer; but not one participant shared this information spontaneously. This was only
revealed when asked about it directly by the researcher. Instead each participant
emphasised that they used the external support received from colleagues to manage their
emotions.
They expressed that interactions with “trusted” colleagues were invaluable in supporting
them to “normalise” their emotions and affirm decisions taken. They highlighted that they
seek this from colleagues due to their timely availability, perceived credibility and the
understanding they have about the pressures and complexity of the job:
“So I come back in and sometimes feeling rather exasperated and kind of need to
talk about it quite quickly to somebody to…share the frustration”(p6)
“….it's a very different conversation that you have with someone who does
understand the role of the job when you're discussing the pressures, stresses and
emotional demands of the job. It's a very different conversation that you have
15 | Page
compared to having a discussion with someone (manager) who doesn't understand,
who has no experience and understanding of the job and the role.”(p3)
Clinical Supervision practice on the other hand was seen by the majority of the participants
as organisation led and not for their emotional support. All of the participants agreed that
clinical supervision has a place in health visiting in providing the time for reflective
discussions relating to caseload management and case decisions. However for all
participants, with organisationally allocated supervisors who were either a child protection
advisor or team leaders; the perceived credibility of the supervisor influenced the benefits
they got from it:
“At the moment we get clinical supervision which to be honest ….where I am at the
moment is not helpful at all….it's not purposeful to me, it's going through the motions.
It's very difficult with clinical supervision, it comes from the top down and we're being
supervised by managers or individuals who have no direct experience of health
visiting.”(p5)
“…you feel very, very alone as a health visitor….. we get…Child Protection
supervision which is to go through each case regardless of the level of risk and the
level of involvement with them, which on the whole is not particularly helpful…. it
feels very much the organisation is protecting itself by very much a task orientated
approach of you know; are you following the guidelines…”(p10)
One practitioner shared a story involving an injured child to justify her intense feelings about
the lack of emotional support offered by her employer. On notifying her team leader of the
incident she was questioned –‘when did you last see the child? Is your paperwork up to
date?’ At no time was she asked how the child was or how she was. This led to reduced
16 | Page
morale as she felt her value within the organisation was belittled to tangible tasks. All
participants reported that such situations influenced the levels of “stress” experienced.
Stress mainly occurred when they found it difficult to cope with the unrecognised demands
of their job. For each practitioner this corresponded to times when trusted colleagues were
also feeling overwhelmed, were not at work or had retired. In all reports this led to needing
“time out”. One HV had been through this recently. Her descriptive account demonstrates
the influence this had:
“I wasn't going to get upset (crying), but I do because I was really stressed, I wasn't
sleeping very well at all, and my kids as well there's been an impact on them
definitely…. you're still thinking about work…you're not really totally focused on them,
it takes you a long time to switch off, and then you're dreading going back to work…..
Over-whelmed yeah…you think aw I've got this to do, I've that to do, but in health
visiting the job is never finished, you've always got something else to do, but it is
actually just the sheer amount of work, with no back-up. You were saying, to
managers, phoning them and saying this is unsafe, and we're over our limit for child
protection and then getting told to take on cases just from another area, and I
thought I need to leave, or I will be off ill, or something is going to happen”(p9)
DISCUSSION
The findings portray health visiting as a complex, emotionally challenging job. As the data
suggests the role is variable and unpredictable due to the universality of the role; with
emotion management involved in a large proportion of the work. This emotion work ranges
from supporting a new parent with anxiety about the care needs of their child to one of
managing distress. It is evident that with increasing frequency health and social care
practitioners are required to work in complex, emotionally charged and potentially volatile
environments to safeguard children (Brandon et al 2010, Vincent & Petch 2012). Such
17 | Page
practice requires abilities and attributes to effectively manage erratic and irregular behaviour
of others (Laming 2003, Scottish Government 2010).
Our data suggests that to do this effectively, the main skill required in child focused practice
is the ability to assess, recognise and respond in contentious situations. This involves
emotion work to manage, deescalate and maintain work with families which promote positive
outcomes for children while avoiding emotional responses that would jeopardise
professional relationships and personal safety.
Participants’ accounts demonstrated how they used EL (Hochschild 1983) in their health
visitor practice. However, in contrast to Hochschild’s findings, it appears that HVs regulate
and manage their emotions beyond the expectations of their employer. Instead, emotion
management is linked to professional identity and professional relationship building.
These findings correspond to studies by Smith (1992, 2012) and Theodosius (2008). It is
apparent that when considering the care needs of others, internal processes to manage
one’s own emotion are more complex than a one process action. In health visiting, like
nursing, EL practice involves in-depth processes to both internally contain personal
emotions, while at the same time externally assisting others to explore their emotions (Ruch
2008, Karimi et al 2014). This becomes increasingly complex when also maintaining
professional standards of empathic, compassionate, respectful and human valuing
healthcare (NMC 2015).
It is evident that for HVs to do this effectively, they utilise a variety of skills and attributes that
can be aligned to a number of theoretical constructs. According to Douglas (2007) this is not
an uncommon finding as professionals who work with children and families are often
influenced and guided by a number of theoretical principles due to the competing demands
within each family.
18 | Page
Hidden labour
The study data illustrated that practitioners require a level of professional agility to navigate,
address and manage complex emotion work (Douglas 2007, Harlow & Smith 2012). There
was evidence that each interviewee was confident in their ability to manage their role
intricacies. However it was clearly believed that the complex nature of their role was not
recognised by others. This causes disparity in role understanding between those aligned
with the profession and those experiencing the profession.
In the UK academic, political and expert developments provide evidence about the actions
undertaken by the HV (Cowley & Frost 2006, Laming 2009, Appleton 2011, RCN 2011,
Scottish Government 2012, DOH&PH England 2013, NNRU 2013). However there remains
a mismatch of understanding about the level of complexity the HV deals with. This lack of
visibility could be attributed to three factors. Academically it can be attributed to the lack of
research on the specific child protecting role of the HV (Harlow & Smith 2012, NNRU 2013).
Sociologically it is proposed as an outcome of the historical design of health visiting, with the
role previously promoted as a ‘mothers friend’ (Davies 1988, page 49) to covertly disguise
their societal monitoring role (Peckover et al 2013). Or finally, the suggestion that there is a
lack of value given to communicative, emotion work which leads to a lack of work recognition
(Davies 1988, Gray & Smith 2008, Smith 2012). The limitations of this study cannot confirm
or deny all three points, but it does highlight that internal emotion management in health
visiting does contribute to this situation.
Impact of undervalued emotions work
The impact that this lack of visibility has on HVs was initially ambiguous throughout the data
with contradictory evidence apparent. In essence it parallels Hochschild's (1983) findings.
Hochschild’s suggests that regular engagement with emotion work in familiar circumstances
19 | Page
increases work competence. This was something HV participants’ confirmed by initially
expressing feelings of competence and resilience to the emotional challenges of their role
(Rutter 2007). However as is evident in this study and Hochschilds, the ability to cope in
challenging situations falters when feelings of unrecognised or undervalued work, poor
support, professional isolation and a loss of workload control emerge.
In Hochschild’s study participants complained about stress when employer expectations
increased. This was referred to as ‘speed up’ (Hochschild 1983, page 21) and aligned to an
analogy of a factory conveyor belt that as it increases in speed; it escalates expectations
from workers and reduces their ability to cope. Examples of when this occurs are during
times of organisational restructure or staff shortages. These examples align with the
findings of this study, with HVs relating their feelings of stress to times when they have
reduced control and support. Polk (1997) suggests that to remain resilient, individuals have
to feel supported, in control and able to access resources (Polk 1997), something that is
absent in the findings of this study.
Such findings fuel concern that a lack of role recognition and support may impact on a
practitioner’s ability to work effectively to protect children. Although further research is
required to qualify this, it is evident that this is something participants are aware of. They
appear mindful that a lack of concentration, engagement or sensitivity on their part could
have irreversible implications for children, families and communities (Laming 2003, Brandon
et al 2010, Vincent & Petch 2012).
In the first collective audit of significant case reviews in Scotland, Vincent and Petch (2012)
imply that employers are not connected with the emotional needs of practitioners. They
record a lack of information about the emotional wellbeing of professionals involved with
children who either died or experienced harm. Such findings correspond to the study data.
20 | Page
According to practitioners, the structured supervision they receive does not consider their
emotions or recognise a relationship between these and their professional wellbeing needs.
Infrastructures of support
This evidence is significant, especially as both study areas were evidently investing in
supervisory frameworks. Unfortunately current supervision arrangements were perceived as
inadequate. This was attributed to the belief that supervisors have a superficial
understanding of the role and focus solely on protocol adherence. This approach appears
not to provide a safe ‘backstage’ area where HVs are comfortable to remove their
professional mask and attend to the emotions they feel in practice (Hoschchild 1983, page
118).
Undeniably, organisationally driven supervision is essential in child protection services
(Laming 2009, Beddoe 2010, Harlow and Smith 2012). However the governance needs of
the organisation should not be at the expense of supervision styles required to sustain
emotional resilience (Ruch 2008, Wallbank and Hatton 2011). For this practitioners require
access to supervision sessions with a neutral, non-managerial figure whose attention is their
emotional wellbeing (Ruch 2008).
Several study participants referred to the supervision that social workers (SW) receive as
exemplary. However, although supervision frameworks are more established in SW
services, SWs report similar experiences to HVs (Winstanley & White 2003, Beddoe 2010).
SWs also believe that their supervision is solely for governance purposes (Adamowich et al
2014). According to Beddoe (2010) this situation is a symptom of the litigious condition of
society; with insecure employers being so concerned about practice scrutiny that they
overlook positive ways to sustain practice.
Study Limitations
21 | Page
This study obtained data to answer its initial question however two main limitations are
evident with the study. Firstly, the study focused on one main theoretical framework. It
would be of interest if other communicative theories were explored in relation to HV practice.
Secondly there is a lack of sample diversity. Although the study sample was representative
of the general population of HVs in the UK, a comparative study with ethnic and male gender
HV groups within each of the four countries of the UK would add to the findings.
Recommendations
As a result of this study it would be recommended that:
Employing organisations’ examine the supervision and support infrastructures that
are in place in relation to practitioners who frequently have to manage of emotions
An exploration of theoretical frameworks that influence practice in child focused
services e.g. emotional intelligence (Goleman 1999); the use of ‘self’ within the
therapeutic relationship (Adamowich et al 2014); containment theory (Bion 1962,
Ruch 2008, Douglas 2007) and professional expertise (Benner 1984, Benner &
Wrubel 1989) is undertaken
A practitioner led campaign to increase people’s awareness about the complexity of
the child safeguarding role
An exploration into the emotional experiences of diverse groups undertaking this
work
An exploration into the impact the management of emotion can have on practice
within child safeguard and protection services with a specific focus on assessment
abilities.
CONCLUSION
The study has explored the emotion work and emotion management processes of the HV. It
has evidenced that this type of work is emotionally complex; with its main role and function
22 | Page
one of communication. This communication is aimed at assessing and addressing
challenging, emotive behaviours, with the focus of working with families to provide a safe
and protective social, emotional and domestic environment for children. In conclusion this
study has provided evidence that although health visiting is recognised nationally within
policy as the profession able to identify and address need as well as co-ordinate services to
safeguard and protect children, there continues to be a lack of visibility of this role by
professionals and managers. This hidden role is detrimental to the professional wellbeing of
the practitioner and in turn could impact on the wellbeing of children services. Without a
clear understanding of a professionals role and full acknowledgement of the emotional
aspects of the work; supportive organisational infrastructures will be inept and could result in
practitioners with limited resilience and high levels of stress and burn out. It is proposed that
the findings of this study can be transferred to several areas of health and social care where
emotion management expectations are high.
References Adamowich, T., Kumsa, M., K., Rego, C., Stoddart, J. & Vito, R. (2014) Playing hide and
seek: Searching for the use of self in reflective social work practice. International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives, 15 (2), 131-143
Alvesson, M. & Skoldberg, K. (2009) Reflexive Methodology. 2nd ed. SAGE Publications Ltd., London.
Appleton, J. V. (2011) Safeguarding and protecting children: where is health visiting now? Community Practitioner, 84, 21 - 25.
Appleton, J. V. & Cowley, S. (2008) Health visiting assessment—unpacking critical attributes in health visitor needs assessment practice: A case study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45, 232-245.
Beddoe, L. (2010) Survellience or Reflection: Professional Supervision in 'the risk society'. British Journal of Social Work, 40, 1279-1296
Benner, P. (1984) From novice to expert. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., California.
Benner, P. & Wrubel, J. (1989) The primacy of caring. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., California.
Bion, W. (1962) Learning from experience. Heinemann, London. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
23 | Page
Psychology, Vol. 3:2, 77-101 Brandon, M., Bailey, S. & Belderson, P. (2010) Building on the learning from serious case
reviews: a two year analysis of child protection database notifications 2007 - 2009. Research Brief. Department of Education, London.
Brooker, C. & Nicol, M. (2011) Alexander's Nursing Practice. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, London.
Burns, N. & Grove, S.K. (2009) The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis and generation of evidence (6th Ed.). W.B Saunders: St. Louis
Connelly, L.M. (2015) Life-worlds in phenomenology. MEDSURG Nursing, 24 (2), 119-120 Cowley, S., Frost, M., Community Practitioners' and Health Visitors' Association. & Amicus
(Organization) (2006) The principles of health visiting : opening the door to public health practice in the 21st century, Amicus/Community Practitioners' and Health Visitors' Association, London.
Davies, C. (1988) The Health Visitor as Mother's Friend: A woman's place in public health 1900 - 1914 The Society for the Social History of Medicine, 1, 39-59
Department of Health Social Services and Public Safety, Northern Ireland (2014) Making life better: A whole system strategic framework for Public Health 2013 - 2023. DHSSPSNI, Belfast.
Department of Health & Public Health, England (2013) National Health Visiting Plan: Progress to date and implementation 2013 onwards. Giving all Children a Healthy Start in Life. HMSO, London.
Department of Health (2010) Equality Analysis: Health Visiting. Crown Copyright, London. Douglas, H. (2007) Containment and reciprocity: Integrating psychoanalytic theory and child
development research for work with children. Routledge, Hove. Emden, C. & Sandelowski, M. (1999) The good, the bad and the relative, part 2: Goodness
and the criterion problem in qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 5, 2-7
Farley, A. & McLafferty, E. (2003) An introduction to qualitative research concepts for nurses. Professional Nurse, 19 (3), 159-63
Goleman, D. (1999) Working with emotional intelligence, Bloomsbury, London. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. London: SAGE
Publications. Gray, B. & Smith, P. (2009) Emotional labour and the clinical settings of nursing care: The
perspectives of nurses in East London. Nurse Education in Practice, 9, 253-261 Harlow, J. & Smith, M. (2012) Chapter 5: Safeguarding children: Debates and Dilemmas for
health visitors. IN Luker, K.A., Orr, J. & McHugh, G. (Eds.) Health Visiting: A rediscovery. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., West Sussex, pp 163-198
Higginbottom, G.M.A., Pillay, J.J., Boadu, N.Y. (2013) Guidance on performing focused ethnographies with an emphasis on healthcare research. The Qualitative Report, 18 (17), 1-16
Hochschild, A. R. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Hogg, R., Kennedy, C., Gray, C. & Hanley, J. (2012) Supporting the case for 'progressive universalism' in Health Visiting: Scottish mothers and Health Visitors' prespectives on targeting and rationing Health Visiting services, with a focus on the Lothian Child Concern Model. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22, 240-250
Information Statistics Division (2014) NHS Scotland workforce statistics 2013. NHS Scotland, Edinburgh.
Kanuha, V.K. (2000) “Being” native versus “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45 (5), 439-47
Karimi, L., Leggat, S. G., Donohue, L., Farrell, G. & Couper, G. E. (2014) Emotional rescue: the role of emotional intelligence and emotional labour on well-being and job-stress among community nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 176-186.
Laming, H. (2003) The Victoria Climbe Inquiry Report, number CM5730. The Stationery Office, London.
24 | Page
Laming, H. (2009) The protection of children in England: A progress report. The Stationery Office, London.
Luker, K. A., Orr, J. & McHugh, G. A. (2012) Health visiting : a rediscovery. Third edition. ed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, West Sussex.
Mackintosh, K. (2011) Clear vision needed for Health Visiting. Scottish Government Holyrood, Edinburgh.
National Nursing Research Unit (2013) Why Health Visiting? A review of the literature about key Health Visiting interventions, processes and outcomes for children and families. King's College London, London.
Nursing & Midwifery Council (2004) Standards of proficiency for specialist community public health nurses. Nursing & Midwifery Council, London.
Nursing & Midwifery Council (2015) The Code: Professional standards of practice and behavior for nurses and midwives. Nursing & Midwifery Council, London.
Nursing & Midwifery Council (2011) Analysis of Diversity Data 2011. Nursing & Midwifery Council, London.
Peckover, S. (2013) From 'Public Health' to 'Safeguarding Children': British Health Visiting in Policy, Practice and Research. Children and Society, 27, 116-126
Polk, L. V. (1997) Toward a middle-range theory of resilience. Advances in Nursing Science, 19, 1-13
Pringle, J., Hendry, C. & McLafferty, E. (2011) Phenomenological approaches: challenges and choices. Nurse Researcher, 8 (2), 7-15
Robinson, J. E. (2002) Choosing your methods. IN Tarling, M & Crofts, L. (Eds.) The essential researcher's handbook: For nurses and healthcare professionals. 2nd ed. Harcourt Publishers Limited, London. 64-81
Robinson, K. (2012) Chapter One: Managing knowledge in health visiting. IN Luker, K A., Orr, J. & McHugh, G. (Eds.) Health Visiting: A rediscovery. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publisher Ltd., West Sussex, pp. 9-49
Robson, C. (2002) Real World Research. A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner Researches (2nd ed). Blackwell: Oxford
Royal College of Nursing (2011) The RCN's UK position on health visiting in the early years. RCN, London.
Ruch, G. (2008) Chapter 21: Developing "containing contexts" for the promotion of effective direct work: the challenge for organisations. IN Luckock, B. & Lefevre, M. (Eds.) Direct Work: Social work with children and young people in care. British Association for Adoption & Fostering, London, pp. 295-306
Rutter, M. (2007) Resilience, competence and coping. Child abuse and neglect, 31,205-209 Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A. & Johnstone, T. (2001) Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory,
Methods, Research. Oxford Press, Oxford. Scottish Executive Health Department (2006) Research Governance Framework for Health
and Community Care (2nd Ed.). Crown Copyright, Edinburgh Scottish Government (2010) National Guidance for Child Protection in Scotland: 2010.
Crown Copyright, Edinburgh Scottish Government (2012) A guide to Getting it Right for every child. Crown Copyright,
Edinburgh. Smith, M. & Horne, M. (2012) Chapter 2: Health Visiting: Context and public health practice.
IN Luker, K., Orr, A. J. & McHugh, G. (Eds.) Health Visiting: A rediscovery. 3rd ed. Blackwell Publisher Ltd., West Sussex, pp. 52-83
Smith, P. (1992) The emotional labour of nursing : its impact on interpersonal relations, management and the educational environment in nursing, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
Smith, P. (2012) The emotional labour of nursing revisited : can nurses still care?, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire.
Streuert-Speziale, H.L. & Carpenter, D.R (2011) Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative (5th Ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia
Theodosius, C. (2008) Emotional labour in health care the unmanaged heart of nursing. Critical studies in health and society. Routledge, London.
25 | Page
United Nations (2010) Millennium Development Goal Summit: Millennium Development Goals and Beyond 2015. United Nations, New York
Vincent, S. & Petch, A. (2012) Audit and Analysis of Significant Case Reviews. Crown Copyright, Edinburgh.
Wallbank, S. & Hatton, S. (2011) Reducing burnout and stress: the effectiveness of clinical supervision. Community Practitioner, 84 (7), 31-35
Welsh Government (2013) Building a brighter future: Early Years and Childcare Plan. Crown Copyright, Cardiff.
Winstanley, J. & White, E. (2003) Clinical Supervision models, measures and best practice. Nurse Researcher, 10 (4), 7-38