ecuador - renenergyobservatory.org · in ecuador there are some mechanisms for renewable energy...
TRANSCRIPT
www.google.comC
Observatory of Renewable Energy
in Latin America and �e Caribbean
AUGUST 2011
Final ReportProduct 3: Financial Mechanism
Final ReportProduct 3: Financial Mechanism
ECUADOR
This document was prepared by the following consultants:
EDUARDO ROSERO and BYRON CHILIQUINGA
The opinions expressed in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsoring organizations: the Latin American Energy Organization (OLADE) and the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).
Accurate reproduction of information contained in this documentation is authorized, provi-ded the source is acknowledged.
1
Case of Ecuador - Part III
CASE OF ECUADOR
Final Report
Component 3: Financial Mechanisms
2
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Content
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 5 2. Methodology ............................................................................................................ 5 3. Financial Mechanisms ............................................................................................... 6
3.1 Detailed list of mechanisms ................................................................................. 6 3.1.1. National financial mechanisms: ....................................................................... 6 3.1.2 International Financial Mechanisms: ................................................................ 8 3.2 Detailed Information of the Financial Mechanisms according to Institutions: ...... 9 3.2.1. Rural Electricification and Urban Marginal Fund (FERUM): ......................... 10 3.2.2. Rural Electrificacion Program for 15,000 homes in the Amazon (PERVA): ... 11 3.2.3. Energy Management Master Plan in Galapagos ............................................. 12 3.2.4. Ecuadodrian Investment Fund in the Energy and Hydrocarbon Sectors (FEISEH): ............................................................................................................... 13 3.2.5. Invesment Projects of the Bank of the Social Security Institute (BIESS): ....... 14 3.2.6. Funding Studies by the National Reinvestment Institute (INP): ...................... 15 3.2.7. CREEcuador Program – Productive Transformation Projects: ...................... 15 3.2.8. Cooperation GEF/Ecuador: ............................................................................ 16 3.2.9. Cooperation United Nations/Ecuador: ........................................................... 16 3.2.10. Euro-Solar Program: .................................................................................... 17 3.2.11. Direct Bilateral Cooperation Germany/Ecuador: .......................................... 18 3.2.12. Direct Bilateral Cooperation South Korea/Ecuador: ..................................... 19 3.2.13. Direct Bilateral Cooperation Japan/Ecuador: ............................................... 19 3.2.14. Bilateral Cooperation South Korea/Ecuador: ............................................... 20 3.2.15. Bilateral Cooperation China/Ecuador: .......................................................... 21 3.2.16. Bilateral Cooperation Russia/Ecuador: ........................................................ 21 3.3. Ecuador’s Cooperation with International Organizations and Countries: ........... 22 3.3.1. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB): ................................................. 22 3.3.2. Global Environment Fund (GEF): ................................................................. 23 3.3.3. United Nations Development Program (UNDP): ........................................... 23 3.3.4. Germany: ...................................................................................................... 23 3.3.5. China:............................................................................................................ 24 3.3.6. South Korea: ................................................................................................. 25 3.3.7. Japan: ........................................................................................................... 26 3.3.8. Russia: .......................................................................................................... 26 3.4. Comparative Analysis of Financial Mechanisms............................................... 27
4. Support mechanisms ............................................................................................... 30 4.1. Support mechanisms in Ecuador ....................................................................... 30 4.1.1. Public Policies: .............................................................................................. 30 4.1.2. Tax Incentives: .............................................................................................. 30 4.1.3. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): ....................................................... 30 5. Successful Cases ................................................................................................. 31 5.1 Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund ................................................................... 31 3.4.2 Bank loan ....................................................................................................... 32 5.3. Bank loan and self financing ............................................................................ 33 5.4. Co-generation project under the CDM: ............................................................. 33 5.5. Centralized International Cooperation: ............................................................. 34 5.6. Public Procurement: ......................................................................................... 34
3
Case of Ecuador - Part III
6. Barriers ............................................................................................................... 35 6.1 Regulatory Framework: ..................................................................................... 35 6.2 Information on current financial mechanisms: ................................................... 35 6.3Power Generation Potential with Renewable Resources: .................................... 35 6.4. State entities support communitary organizations: ............................................ 36 6.6. Lack of knowledge of CDM among potential project developers: ..................... 36 6.7. Subsidies to commercial fossil energy: ............................................................. 37
7. Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 37 8. Bibliography .......................................................................................................... 39 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: List of National Financial Mechanisms………………………………………6 Table 2: List of International Financial Mechanisms………………………………….8 Table 3: Comparative Analysis of the Financial Mechanisms………………………..27
4
Case of Ecuador - Part III
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document has the objective of analyzing the various financial mechanisms that exist in the country and that are allocated for the promotion, study, project preparation and implementation of power plants using renewable resources. The financial mechanisms that were considered and thus are outlined in this study are those that are offered by national agencies and international cooperation agencies to implement renewable energy projects. In accordance with the government policy, these mechanisms seek to diversify the energy matrix of the country. In this manner, the financial apparatus seeks to reduce the high contribution of fossil fuels in the energy supply for the principal economic and strategic activities of the population; increase the use of natural resources that generate commercial energy and reduce environmental pollution produced by the energy sector’s emissions by producing clean or environmentally friendly energy. By documenting existing mechanisms for financing renewable energy projects and making the information available to the national and international community, this will provide a better understanding of the existing alternatives and it will facilate the increase of energy generation with renewable resources.
5
Case of Ecuador - Part III
1. Introduction
This document presents an analysis of the available information regarding the financial mechanisms targeted for renewable energy projects in Ecuador and it also contains information regarding the institutions that offer such mechanisms, the financing methods used in this county, and some successful stories and barriers. Additionally, information about the support mechanisms and their current use is provided, several success stories and their barriers are described. Finally, the document contains several conclusions of the analyzed information in this report. 2. Methodology
In order to prepare this report, information was gathered from several governmental institutions that are responsible for the promotion and execution of renewable energy projects. Interviews and telephone calls were carried out with various public officials from the following entities:
• Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy-MEER • National Electricity Council - CONELEC • Electricity Corporation of Ecuador - CELEC EP • Hidrotoapi Company
Telephone contact was also established with officials from entities that are responsible of the international cooperation, such as:
• Technical Secretariat for International Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Additionally, technical documents and websites of the organizations mentioned above were also consulted, highlighting the following:
• Catalog Offer for International Cooperation of the Technical Secretariat of International Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
• Progress reports of programs and projects developed by the MEER, CONELEC and CELEC EP
• Website of the Ministry of Coordination of Production, Employment and Competitiveness (MCPEC).
6
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3. Financial Mechanisms In Ecuador there are some mechanisms for renewable energy projacts, in particular for those iniativesor activities performed by state-owned entities. Also, for the private sector there are some options, but according to the policy adopted by the Government, the implementation of energy projects in general and in particular those related to renewable energy need to be developed mostly by using financial resources allocated by the State or available on entities where it holds a stake, as discussed later on this report. In regards to financial mechanisms, it is necessary to highlight the main policies that the Government has created to promote a greater participation of renewable energies in the country's energy supply basket1:
• Diversification of the energy national matrix by increasing the participation of renewable energies;
• Provide energy to the people located in rural sectors, especially in isolated areas; • Increase the contribution of hydropower to the electricity supply; • Incorporate biofuels in the transport sector, replacing the extra fuel consumed in
Guayaquil by mixing ethanol (5%) – gasoline; • Zero fossil fuels on the Galapagos Islands.
3.1 Detailed list of mechanisms
3.1.1. National financial mechanisms:
1 MEER (Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy), 2008p, Policies and Strategies for Changing
the Energy Mix of Ecuador, May 2008
TABLE 1: LIST OF NATIONAL FINANCIAL MECHANISMS
Institution Name of
Program/Mechanism
Type of
Mechanism
and Validity
Period
Funding
Phase of the
Project
Geographical
Coverage Website
CONELEC
Rural Electrification and Urban Marginal Fund (FERUM)
Non-Refundable
State Investment
/ 2008 - 2012
All of them, if these meet the requirements.
National, preferably in
border areas, the Amazon and Galapagos
http://www.conelec.gov.ec
CELEC EP Rural electrification program for 15,000 houses in the Amazon(PERVA)
Non-Refundable
State Investment
/ 2012 - 2013
All of them Amazonia http://www.conelec.gov.ec
MEER
Energy Management Master Plan for Galapagos (example: Photovoltaic Power Plant in Floreana)
Non-Refundable
State Investment
/ 2010 - 2012
All of them Floreana Island,
Galapagos http://www.meer.gov.ec
Central Bank Ecuadorian Investment Fund in the energy and
Non-Refundable
All of them, in investment
National -
7
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Source: Own Development
As it can be seen in the table above, the majority of the identified mechanisms are directed to the allocation of state resources to implement projects that are in accordance with the policies of renewable energy. Most of these mechanisms are available as government grants or contributions to the projects, which are generally managed by central government agencies (ministries or businesses) or local agencies (provincial and municipal councils). Among the mechanisms presented above, one is highlighted: BIESS, an entity created in 2010 as an investment bank, which uses funds from members of the Ecuadorian Social Security Institute (IESS) to finance both public and private projects in the long-term. Despite the short life span of this institution, BIEES has already begun funding electricity generation projects, which are detailed below.
hydrocarbon sector (FEISEH) - Examples: Hydropower Plants: Mazar, Coca Codo Sinclair, Toachi Pilaton
State Investment
/ 2008 - 2012
projects
Bank of the Social
Security Institute
(BIESS) -CELEC EP
Investment Projects (e.g.: Villonaco Wind Project)
Loan / 2011 -
undefined
Construction and start up
National – Loja Province
-
Ministry of Coordination
for Production, Employment
and Competitiveness (MCPEC)
CREEcuador Program - Productive Transformation
Projects
Investment with Venture Capital Funds
/ 2010 - undefined
All of them National http://www.creecuador.ec
National Pre-investment
Institute (INP)
Financing research (e.g. studies of geothermal fields)
Non-Refundable
State Investment
/ 2008 - undefined
Pre-investment studies
National http://www.preinversion.gob.
ec/
8
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.1.2 International Financial Mechanisms:
TABLE 2: LIST OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MECHANISMS
Entity Name of
Program/Mechanism
Type of
Mechanism
and Validity
Period
Phase of the
Funding
Project
Geographical
Coverage Website
Government of Japan
(JAICA) – MEER
Direct bilateral cooperation Japan / Ecuador (e.g.: Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos - Baltra Island Photovoltaic Project)
Non-Refundable Cooperation
Fund / 2010 - 2012
All of them Baltra Island,
Galapagos http://www.meer.gov.ec
German Government
(KfW) – MEER
Direct bilateral cooperation Germany / Ecuador ( e.g. Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos - Isabela Island Photovoltaic Project)
Non-Refundable Cooperation
Fund / 2010 - 2012
All of them Isabela Island ,
Galapagos http://www.meer.gov.ec
Korean Government (KOICA) –
MEER
Direct bilateral cooperation Korea / Ecuador (e.g. Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos - Photovoltaic Project Santa Cruz Island)
Non-Refundable Cooperation
Fund / 2010 - 2012
All of them Santa Cruz
Island, Galapagos http://www.meer.gov.ec
Eximbank Bank from
Korea -MEER
Direct Bilateral Cooperation Korea / Ecuador - Investment Projects (e.g. Energy Management Master Plan Galapagos: Photovoltaic Project Santa Cruz - San Cristobal Island Photovoltaic Project)
Loan (reimbursable
fund) / 2010 - 2012
All of them
Santa Cruz Island / San
Cristobal Island - Galapagos
http://www.meer.gov.ec
Global Environment
Fund (GEF) – MEER
Cooperation GEF / Ecuador - (e.g. Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos - Baltra - Santa Cruz Wind Project)
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund - State Investment
/ 2010 - 2012
All of them Baltra and Santa
Cruz Islands, Galapagos
http://www.meer.gov.ec
United Nations Fund
(UNF) – MEER
United Nations Cooperation / Ecuador (e.g. Management Master Plan Energy in Galapagos - Baltra- Santa Cruz Wind Project)
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund - State Investment
/ 2010 - 2012
All of them Baltra and Santa
Cruz Islands, Galapagos
http://www.meer.gov.ec
German Government
(BMU y DED) – MEER
Direct Bilateral Cooperation Germany / Ecuador (e.g. Energy Management Master Plan in Galapagos-Zero Fossil Fuel Program in Galapagos - Using Pinion)
International Technical
Cooperation Non
Reimbursable - State
Investment / 2010 – 2012
All of them Floreana Island,
Galapagos http://www.meer.gov.ec
Eximbank Bank from
Korea - CELEC EP
Direct bilateral cooperation Korea / Ecuador (e.g. Investment Projects - Wind Project Villonaco)
Loan / 2010 – 2012
Construction and start up
National - Loja Province
-
9
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Source: Own Development
With regards to the funding mechanisms that come from international organizations (see Table 2), most of the identified mechanisms are a result of a direct relationship between the State and the international entity, thus these financial mechanisms are granted under the framework of ¨bilateral cooperation¨ and the resources are usually granted as “Non-Refundable.” Moreover, the table gives detail of some international banks, which also provide funding under the scheme of ¨State-State: bilateral cooperation¨; however, these resources are granted as loans, and their conditions are set according to the situation and circumstances of each case. In order to obtain these loans, the approval and support of the Ecuadorian State is a requirement, and that is why the projects that receive financial support under this scheme are usually implemented and administred by the state agencies. 3.2 Detailed Information of the Financial Mechanisms according to Institutions: The most relevant mechanisms that were mentioned in the previous section are presented below on a technical sheet that summarizes the information available for each mechanism:
Eximbank Bank from
China – Hidro Coca
Company
Direct bilateral cooperation China / Ecuador (e.g. Investment Projects - Coca Codo Sinclair Hydropower Plant)
Loan / 2010 - 2023
Construction and start up National
-
Eximbank Bank from
China – Hidro Paute
Company
Direct bilateral cooperation China / Ecuador (e.g. Investment Projects - Sopladora Hydropower Plant)
Loan / 2010 – 2023
Construction and start up
National – Azuay Province
-
Eximbank Bank from
Russia - HidroToachi
Direct bilateral cooperation Russia / Ecuador (e.g. Investment Projects - Toachi Pilatón Hydropower Plant)
Loan / 2011 - 2023
Construction and start up
Pichincha and Cotopaxi Provinces
-
European Commission –
MEER Euro-Solar Program
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund – State Investment
/ 2007 – October 2011
All of them National -
10
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.2.1. Rural Electricification and Urban Marginal Fund (FERUM):
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism
Rural Electrification and Urban Marginal Fund (FERUM)
Entity CONELEC
Application
• Electrical Distribution Companies
• Representatives of regional governments, Provincial Councils, Municipalities
• Communities
Technology Type
• Improvement and strengthening of distribution systems
• Network Extension
• Infrastructure of sub transmission systems
• Renewable energy: mini hydropower, wind, solar photovoltaic, biomass plants.
Validity Period 2008 - 2012
Geographic Area
Provinces in the borders, and Amazonia and Galapagos.
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation)
• New constructions
• Expansion and improvement of distribution systems in rural and / or marginal urban areas
• Construction of generation systems using renewable energies, destined for the exclusive service of rural areas
• Operation and maintenance of not incorporated electrical systems into the INS.
Available budget US$ 648 millions of dollars
Short description Budget for 5 years
Type of Loan Non- refundable funds
Interest Rate % N/A.-
Application Procedures
• The identification and planning processes of projects is the responsibility of the distribution companies, in whose jurisdiction these were to be implemented. This will have to be undertaken in coordination with the provincial councils and the relevant municipalities.
• Projects are subject to the approval of CONELEC.
• CONELEC approves the projects and their annual budgets.
• The existing distribution companies will be in charge of the operation and maintenance of projects.
Others -
Results
The implementation of rural electrification projects funded by FERUM through the Distribution Companies during the period
11
Case of Ecuador - Part III
1998-2009, reached a total of 13,863 projects that sought to meet the needs of 1,177,150 houses.
Date -
Name of the projects that have been benefited
In the FERUM 2008 program a total of 2,443 projects benefited, which amounted a total of USD $126,562,752 that benefited 582.,702 houses.
Amount approved US$ In 2008 FERUM Program USD $ 126,562, 752
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Electrfication Master Plan of Ecuador, 2009) 3.2.2. Rural Electrificacion Program for 15,000 homes in the Amazon (PERVA):
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism
Rural Electrification Program for 15,000 homes in the Amazon (PERVA)
Entity CELEC EP
Application
• Representatives of local governments:
municipalities and communities
Technology Type
• Photovoltaic panels
• Other renewable sources
Validity Period 2012 – 2013 (18 months)
Geographic Area Amazonia
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation)
• Studies
• Project execution
• Sustainability of the projects.
Available budget US$ 52,5 millions of dollars
Short description
There are two types of projects: 1) grid extension and decentralized systems. 2): micro hydropower plants, individual photovoltaic systems, micro networks with hybrid systems, wind energy systems, etc.
Type of Loan Non- refundable fund
Interest Rate % N/A.--
Application Procedures
• Each community will be considered as a separate project. The program will consist of 2,145 projects. Each project will take the name of the community.
• Preparation of specifications for the procurement of the design studies.
• Socialization of the project in the community.
• Study of project design.
• Development of agreements to support the installation of community systems.
• Electrification of houses.
• Electrification of community systems.
• Monitoring the implementation of
12
Case of Ecuador - Part III
electrification works.
• Training community technicians and users.
• Delivery of the executed projects and constructions.
• Delivery of the project to public companies.
Others -
Results
The following results are expected :
• Electrical studies in 2,145 communities.
• 15,000 homes with electricity.
• Establishment of public company or a unit within an existing public company which will be in charge of the administration, management and sustainability projects.
• Sustainability Program of projects.
Date -
Name of the projects that have been benefited Program in the preliminary studies stage
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the interview of Ings. Marcelo Espín y Mario Brito)
3.2.3. Energy Management Master Plan in Galapagos
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Energy Management Master Plan in Galapagos
Entity MEER
Application State programming of a series of energy power projects
Technology Type Solar photovoltaic, wind power
Validity Period 2010 – 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and operation
Available budget US$ It depends on international cooperation agreements and the loans made by the MEER to co-finance projects of the Program.
Short description
The following projects have been developed: • Photovoltaic Power Plant in Floreana • Photovoltaic Project Baltra- • Photovoltaic Project Isabela Island • Photovoltaic Project Santa Cruz Island • Photovoltaic Project Santa Cruz Island • San Cristobal Photovoltaic Project • Wind Project Santa Cruz- Baltra • Zero Fossil Fuel Program in Galapagos - Using Pinion
Type of Loan These are mainly non-refundable state investments, but there are some projects that have a bank loan.
Interest Rate % It does not apply in cases of the non-refundable
13
Case of Ecuador - Part III
funds. In the case of loans, the interest rate is set individually for each project. It also considers bank loans for co-financing.
Application Procedures Projects considered in the MEER annual program
Others -
Results -
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited Program under development
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the interview of public officers of MEER: Ings. Patricia Recalde, Paula Sánchez, Edison Chicaiza, Gabriel Rengifo)
3.2.4. Ecuadodrian Investment Fund in the Energy and Hydrocarbon Sectors
(FEISEH):
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Ecuadorian Investment Fund in the energy and hydrocarbon sectors (FEISEH)
Entity Central Bank
Application
The Fund has the following instances: • Commission (COFEISEH), which qualifies the investment projects that will be funded and it is also in charge of allocating the resources. • Technical Committee (COTEFEISEH), which prepares a project investment portfolio, suggests the priorities for implementation and elaborates the report of technical, economic, financial, social and environmental viability of the investment projects, whose selection will be recommended to COFEISEH
Technology Type
Financial support for investment projects in the energy sector. Hydropower plants
Validity Period
2008 – 2012 (The financing period depends on the duration of each project)
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Construction and start up
Available budget US$ -
Short description
Type of Loan
Resources are allocated in two ways: direct investment and loans to the executors of the project
Interest Rate % Determined in each case
Application Procedures Application to request fund
Others -
Results Several hydropower plants under construction
14
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited
Coca Codo Sinclair, Ocaña, Mazar and Sopladora Power Plants
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (informaton taken from the Ministery of Economic and Financing of Ecuador, Press Release, 2007)
3.2.5. Invesment Projects of the Bank of the Social Security Institute (BIESS):
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Investment Projects
Entity Bank of the Social Security Institute
Application Construction of Electric Generating Plants
Technology Type Hydropower, wind and thermal plants
Validity Period
2011 – undefined (This mechanism is established for each project. As an example, it is mentioned the power plants in Santa Elena and Quevedo which had a validity period of 12 years counting from the beginning of the commercial operation).
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Construction and start up
Available budget US$ N/A
Short description
As an example, the Quevedo (100 MW) and Santa Elena power plants (90 MW), the BIESS financed 60% of the total project value.
Type of Loan Investment Projects
Interest Rate
%
Esbtablished according to the conditions of each loan. In thermal power plants in Quevedo and Santa Elena a 7.5% interest rate was set.
Application Procedures
Application of electric companies to the Bank, the respective feasibility studies and financial performance
Others -
Results -
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited
Power Plants in Quevedo, Santa Elena and Villonaco wind farm. In negotiating the loan to the Toachi Pilatón hydropower plant.
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the interview of public officers of MEER: Ings. Patricia Recalde, Paula Sánchez, Edison Chicaiza, Gabriel Rengifo)
15
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.2.6. Funding Studies by the National Reinvestment Institute (INP):
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Funding of studies
Entity National Reinvestment Institute
Application
Preparation of feasibility studies and technical and financial feasibility
Technology Type Renewable energies in general
Validity Period 2008 – undefined (is still valid)
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility
Available budget US$ N/A
Short description
Support to the reaslization of the feasibility studies, 100% of the total value can be funded
Type of Loan Non-Refundable State Investment
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures INP application to the proposed project
Others -
Results -
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited
Studies in the geothermal fields, Chacana and Chachimbiro, and Tufiño; Cardenillo hydropower project studies.
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the interview of public officers of MEER: Ings. Patricia Recalde, Paula Sánchez, Edison Chicaiza, Gabriel Rengifo)
3.2.7. CREEcuador Program – Productive Transformation Projects:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism
CREEcuador Program - Productive Transformation Project
Entity
Coordinating Minister of Production, Employment and Competitiveness
Application
Supporting the development of projects that benefit productive sectors
Technology Type Renewables in general
Validity Period
2010 – undefined (the project can last between 3 and 6 years).
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$
Between 500,000 and 2 millions of dollars per project.
Short description
The Fund may invest up to 49% of the total project value
Type of Loan Investment with venture capital funds
16
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures
Application to the Fund with technical and financial information of the project
Others -
Results -
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited N/A
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the interview of public officers of MEER: Ings. Patricia Recalde, Paula Sánchez, Edison Chicaiza, Gabriel Rengifo)
3.2.8. Cooperation GEF/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Cooperation GEF / Ecuador
Entity Global Environment Fund (GEF)
Application
Energy Management Master Plan in Galapagos – Baltra - Santa Cruz Wind Project
Technology Type Wind Energy
Validity Period 2010 – 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$ ND
Short description
Wind systems parallel to the network connection. The electrical interconnection system will transport energy from Baltra to Santa Cruz Island.
Type of Loan Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures
Project in the GEF Cooperation - Government of Ecuador.
Others -
Results -
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited ND
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalgo of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.2.9. Cooperation United Nations/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism United Nations / Ecuador Cooperation
Entity United Nations Fund
Application
Energy Management Master Plan in Galapagos - Baltra- Santa Cruz Wind Project
17
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Technology Type Wind Energy
Validity Period 2010 – 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$ N/A
Short description
Wind connection systems parallel to the network. The electrical interconnection system will transport energy from Baltra to Santa Cruz.
Type of Loan Non-Refundable cooperation fund
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures
The project is part of the Cooperation Program between the UN and the Government of Ecuador.
Others -
Results -
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited N/A
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.2.10. Euro-Solar Program:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Euro-Solar Program
Entity European Commission
Application
Regional Program that takes place in 8 countries, including Ecuador.
Technology Type
Photovoltaic solar energy for communication (computers - Internet), education and health.
Validity Period 2007 – 2011 (October 2011)
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$ 4,79 million Euros
Short description
Seeks to provide to 91 communities in Ecuador the following: access to solar energy for electricity generation strictly for community use, computers, a projector, a refrigerator for medicines and a water purifier. Also, it will be offered services of education, culture, productive, social, communication and health applications will be provided.
Type of Loan Non-Refundable cooperation fund
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures
The project in Ecuador is part of the Regional Euro-Solar program.
Others -
18
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Results
The Project is developed in communities in the provinces of Esmeraldas, Guayas, Orellana, Sucumbios, Napo, Pastaza and Morona Santiago.
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited N/A
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (Information taken from MEER, 2008). 3.2.11. Direct Bilateral Cooperation Germany/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism
Direct Bilateral Cooperation Germany / Ecuador
Entity
Government of Germany through its institutions: DED and BMU (Biofuels) and KfW (solar photovoltaic)
Application
Energy Management Master Plan Galapagos - Zero Fossil Fuel Program in the Galapagos Islands / Using of the Pinon and Photovoltaic Project in Isabela Island.
Technology Type Biofuels
Validity Period 2010 – 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$ N/A
Short description
Biofuels Project on Floreana Island, including the purchase of two generators of 70 kWp each. Project to build a photovoltaic system up to 400 kWp
Type of Loan
Non- Refundable Financial and Technical Cooperation
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures
Project part of the Bilateral Cooperation Germany - Ecuador
Others -
Results
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited -
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
19
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.2.12. Direct Bilateral Cooperation South Korea/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism
Direct bilateral cooperation South Korea /Ecuador
Entity
Government of South Korea through the National Agency for the Cooperation of Korea KOICA
Application
Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos Photovoltaic Project Santa Cruz Island
Technology Type Photovoltaic Solar Energy
Validity Period 2010 - 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$ Under negotiation
Short description
Construction of a photovoltaic system up to 1.5 kWp in Phase I the project.
Type of Loan Non-Refundable cooperation fund
Interest Rate % To be defined
Application Procedures
The project is part of the cooperation between the governments of Korea and Ecuador.
Others -
Results Project under negotiation
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited -
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.2.13. Direct Bilateral Cooperation Japan/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Direct bilateral cooperation Japan / Ecuador
Entity
Government of Japan through its International Cooperation Agency JAICA
Application
Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos - Photovoltaic Project Baltra
Technology Type Photovoltaic Solar Energy
Validity Period 2010 – 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Feasibility, construction and start up
Available budget US$ Under negotiation
Short description
Construction of a photovoltaic system up to 500 kWp, a project to be developed in the new ecological airport in Baltra.
Type of Loan Non-Refundable cooperation fund
20
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Interest Rate % N/A
Application Procedures
The project is part of the cooperation Japan - Ecuador
Others -
Results
The project is in final phase of management of non-refundable funds
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited -
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.2.14. Bilateral Cooperation South Korea/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism
Bilateral Cooperation of South Korea / Ecuador
Entity Eximbank Bank from Korea
Application
Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos - Photovoltaic Projects in the Santa Cruz and San Cristobal Islands.
Villonaco Wind Power Plant Project
Technology Type Renewable energies in general
Validity Period 2010 – 2012
Geographic Area Galapagos Islands and Loja Province
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Construction and start up
Available budget US$ Under negotiation
Short description
PV projects: construction of 1.5 kWp system (Phase II) and 3 kWp.
Wind project: construction of 30 MW plant.
Type of Loan
In negotiation: amounts, interest rates and terms
Interest Rate % To be defined
Application Procedures
Application to the Bank through the channels of international cooperation in the country.
Others -
Results Projects under negotiation with the Bank
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited -
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
21
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.2.15. Bilateral Cooperation China/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Bilateral cooperation China / Ecuador
Entity Eximbank Bank from China
Application
Construction of hydropower plants Coca Codo Sinclair and Sopladora
Technology Type Hydrolic energy
Validity Period 2011 - 2013 (12 years)
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Construction and start up
Available budget US$ Under negotiation
Short description
Planning and construction of hydropower plants
Type of Loan
EPC contract. Loan of 85% of the total value of construction.
Interest Rate % To be defined in the negotiation
Application Procedures
Application to the Bank through the channels of international cooperation in the country.
Others -
Results
Projects under negotiation with the Bank. The Coca Codo Sinclair plant already began preliminary construction work.
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited -
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.2.16. Bilateral Cooperation Russia/Ecuador:
Parameters Units Information
Name of the mechanism Bilateral cooperation Russia / Ecuador
Entity Eximbank Bank from Russia
Application
Construction of Toachi Pilatón hydropower plant - Hidrotoapi is the company formed for the Construction and start up.
Technology Type Hydraulic energy
Validity Period 2011 - 2023 (It is still under negotiation)
Geographic Area National
Phase of the project (feasibility, construction,
operation) Construction and start up
Available budget US$ ND
Short description
Planning and construction the hydropower plant
Type of Loan Under negotiation
Interest Rate % To be defined
22
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Application Procedures
Application to the Bank through the channels of international cooperation in the country.
Others -
Results
Project under negotiation with the bank that will finance the equipment (85% of the total value of equipment). Preliminary work will begin with the funds of the Company.
Date January, 2011
Name of the projects that have been benefited -
Amount approved US$ -
Source: own elaboration (information taken from the Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.3. Ecuador’s Cooperation with International Organizations and Countries:
The Ecuadorian government maintaines cooperation relationships with several international agencies and countries from all over the world, with several of which it has existing cooperative agreements or business relationships. These cooperation agreements consider energy as one of the principal components of collaboration, especially all projects related to the development of renewable energy.
The coordination for international cooperation in the country is focalized in the Technical Secretariat of International Cooperation in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. This entity has all the information on the activities carried out with each of the foreign aid workers.
Below are the details of the existing cooperation with some organizations and countries that actively support the development of renewable energy in Ecuador, according to the information available at the Technical Secretariat for International Cooperation (Catalg of International Cooperation Offer, 2011)
3.3.1. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB):
Country’s Strategy:
• Consolidate the production structure and promote social development and protecte the most vulnerable population. As a cross-cutting element, it supports the institutional strengthening.
Cooperation Modalities :
• Loans
• Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• Technical Cooperation
Intervention Sectors :
• Infrastructure
• Energy
• Climate Change
• Water and Sanitation
• Education
• Health
Representative in Ecuador:
Carlos N. Melo Edificio World Trade Center
23
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Torre II, Piso 9, Telephone: 2996969 E-mail: [email protected]
3.3.2. Global Environment Fund (GEF):
Cooperation Modalities :
• Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• Technical Cooperation
• Training
Intervention Sectors :
• Management and Conservation of Natural Resources
• Protection of the Environment and Natural Disasters
• Administrative
Punto Focal ante el GEF:
Federico Meneses Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores Quito E-mail: [email protected]
3.3.3. United Nations Development Program (UNDP):
Country’s Strategy: • Strategic Plan 2008 - 2012
Cooperation Modalities :
• Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• Technical Cooperation
• Emergency Food Aid
Intervention Sectors :
• Agricultur and livestock
• Environment
• Administrative
Representative in Ecuador:
José Manuel Hermida Av. Amazonas 2889 y La Granja, Quito Tel.: 2460330 ext.2201 E-mail: [email protected]
3.3.4. Germany:
Country’s Strategy:
• Development cooperation strategies with Latin American and
the Caribbean countries.
• Strategies by sector:
o Priority area of the German cooperation with Ecuador: Environment and Natural Resources Protection
o Framework Document on Priority Area Orientation: Modernization of the State, Decentralization and Strengthening of decentralized autonomous governments.
Cooperation Modalities :
• Non-refundable fund
• Technical Assistance
• Debt swap
• Scholarships, Internships
• Public-Private Partnerships
• Cooperation in Science and Technology
• Trade Cooperation
24
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Intervention Sectors :
• Modernization of the State, decentralization andstrengthening of decentralized autonomous governments.
• Protection of the Environment and Natural Resources
Cooperation Actors:
• Germany Embassy in Quito
Actors of the Official Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Christian Berger Quito Web: http://www.quito.diplo.de/
• Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development(BMZ) Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Minister Federal Dirk Niebel Bonn E-mail: [email protected]
• Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Minister Norbert Rottgen Berlin E-mail: [email protected]
• GTZ Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Jorg Peter Holla Quito E-mail: [email protected]
• DED Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Lothar Rast Quito E-mail: [email protected]
• InWent Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Andean Regional Office Lima E-mail: [email protected]
• KfW Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Eudoxia Tello Casa Alemana Quito E-mail: [email protected]
Undertaken cooperations: • Non-Refundable cooperation (2007-2009) for an amount of USD $ 97,40 millions dollars in Ecuador.
3.3.5. China:
Cooperation Modalities :
• Refundable Financial Cooperation
• Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• Trade Cooperation
• Technical Cooperation o Grants o Scholarships o Volunteer
• Humanitarian Aid
• University Cooperation
25
Case of Ecuador - Part III
• Military Cooperation
Intervention Sectors :
• Education
• Infrastructure
• Health
• Environmental Sanitation
Cooperation Actors:
• China Embassy in Ecuador
Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Ambassador Cain Rung Quito E-mail: [email protected]
Undertaken cooperations: • Non-refundable cooperation ( 2007 - 2009) for an amount of USD $ 14,21 million dollars in Ecuador:
3.3.6. South Korea:
Country’s Strategy: • Country’s Assistance Strategy (CAS) for Ecuador
Cooperation Modalities :
• Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• Technical Cooperation o Scholarships o funds for research and consulting o Volunteer o Provision of equipment
Intervention Sectors :
• Education
• Health
• Productive Support
• Environmental Sanitation
• Environment and Natural Disasters
Cooperation Actors:
South Korea Embassy in Ecuador Official Cooperation Agency Contact: Keen – Ho Jang Quito E-mail: [email protected]
• Korean International Cooperation Agency - KOICA Actors of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Kim Young - rill Quito E-mail: [email protected]
• Korea Center for Environment Research Unregistered NGOs, Line of Action: Protection of the Environment and Natural Disasters Contact: Kim, Hung-Kook Seoul, Korea E-mail: [email protected]
Undertaken cooperations: Non-refundable cooperatio (2007 - 2009) for an amount of USD $ 8,69 million dollars in Ecuador:
26
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.3.7. Japan:
Country’s Strategy:
• Policy and Cooperation Strategy of Japan to Ecuador
Cooperation Modalities :
• Technical Cooperation
• Refundable Financial Cooperation
• Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• Public Safety
Intervention Sectors :
• Education
• Health
• Environmental Sanitation
• Social Development
• Productive Support
• Agriculture and Fisheries
• Environment and Natural Disasters
• Energy and Natural Resources
• Transportation, Communication and Road works
Cooperation Actors:
• Embassy of Japan in Ecuador Official Cooperation Agency Contact: Osamu Imai Quito E-mail: [email protected]
• International Cooperation Agency of Japan (JICA) Official Actor of the Direct Bilateral Cooperation Contact: Masao Taka Quito E-mail: [email protected]
Undertaken cooperations: • Non-refundable cooperations (2007-2009) for an amount of 72,98 million dollars in Ecuador.
3.3.8. Russia:
Cooperation Modalities :
• Technical Cooperation o Experts o Scholarships
Intervention Sectors :
• Science and Technology
• Energy
• Oil
• Culture
• Education
Cooperation Actors:
• Embassy of Russia in Ecuador Official Cooperation Agency Contact: Yan Burley, Ambassador Quito E-mail: [email protected]/quito.rusembassy.org
27
Case of Ecuador - Part III
3.4. Comparative Analysis of Financial Mechanisms
TABLE 3: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL MECHANISMS
Entity
Name of
Program /
Mechanism
Overview of
Program /
Mechanism
Public or
Private
Mechanis
m Geographi
cal scope
Project’s
funded
phase Loan Interest
or Rate Loan
Guarantee
Loan Period
(How long is the
Loan?
Minimu
m
amount
funded
Maximum
amount
funded
Loan
Requiremen
ts Applicatio
n Process Comments
CONELEC FERUM
- Networks, - Distribution systems, - Renewable Energy Systems
Public
Border Areas Amazon Galapagos
All phases
Non-refundable State Investment
Contributed by Provincial Councils, Municipalities and Users
In general annually
5,000- 100,000
Request of Distribution Companies, Provincial Councils, municipalities
Annual Program FERUM
There is a program 2008 – 2012
CELEC EP PERVA
Electrification of 15 000 households with Renewable Energy (SFV)
Public Amazonia All phases
Non-refundable State Investment
Contribution of local entities and Users
In preliminary studies phase
To be defined
To be defined
Application of the beneficiary communities
Community within the Project
Productive uses, connectivity, Health Others
MINISTRY OF HOUSING (MIDUVI)
Housing Bond Solar heating in homes
Public National All phases
Non-refundable State Investment
- In preliminary studies phase
To be defined
To be defined
N/A Request of the beneficiary
-
MEER
Energy Management Master Plan of Galapagos
Construction of photovoltaic, Wind and Befoul plants
Public Galapagos All phases
Non-refundable State Investment
State counterpart for projects with Loans
It depends on each project and its specified in the cooperation /agreement
N/A N/A
Cooperation agreement / contract with a state-owned entity
Annual Program MEER
Each project has a budget
Central Bank FEISEH Construction of Hydropower Plants
Public National Construction and start up
Non-refundable State Investment
- It depends on the estimated construction time
N/A N/A Request by state-owned agency
Annual Program
Each plant is built by a company
28
Case of Ecuador - Part III
BIESS Investment Projects
Construction of Power Plants
Public National Construction and start up
Loans State Counterpart
Estimated time for construction
N/A N/A Request by a Company
Request to BIEES
-
MCPEC
CRE Ecuador program - BioEcuador Fund
Productive transformation projects
Public National All phases
Non-refundable State Investment
Counterpart of the beneficiary
Time stated in the Terms of Reference between 3 to 6 years 500,000
2 millions of dollars
49% of the total has been funded
Beneficiary's request to MCPEC -
INP Studies Financed
Energy Pre-investment studies
Public National Studies
Non-refundable State Investment NA
Time stated in the Terms of Reference N/A N/A N/A
Beneficiary's request to INP -
ENDESA Cogeneration in plywood Company
Own funding and Bank loan
Private Quito Construction and start up of the plant
Loan from 50% to 11% interest
N/A 5 years N/A
Private bank finances 50% of the total
Regular banking process
N/A -
ECOELECTRIC
Cogeneration in sugar mills
Own funding Private La Troncal (El Triunfo)
Construction and start up of the plant
Own Funds and CDM Mechanism
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A - CDM was applied
Government of Japan (JAICA)
Direct bilateral cooperation Japan / Ecuador
Galapagos Master Plan - Photovoltaic Project
Public Baltra Island, Galapagos
All of them
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
Cooperation Agreement with the State
Time stated in the Terms of Reference N/A N/A N/A
Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
German Government (KfW)
Direct bilateral cooperation Germany / Ecuador
Galapagos Master Plan - Photovoltaic Project
Public Isla Isabela, Galapagos
All of them
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
Cooperation Agreement with the State
Time stated in the Terms of Reference N/A N/A NA
Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
Korean Government (KOICA)
Direct bilateral cooperation Korea / Ecuador
Galapagos Master Plan - Photovoltaic Project
Public Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos
All of them
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
Cooperation Agreement with the State
Time stated in the Terms of Reference N/A N/A N/A
Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
29
Case of Ecuador - Part III
Eximbank from Korea
Direct bilateral cooperation Korea / Ecuador
Investment Projects - Photovoltaic and Wind projects
Public
Santa Cruz and San Cristobel Island - Loja
All of them Loan (interest To be defined)
Cooperation Agreement with the State
To be defined N/A N/A N/A Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
GEF Cooperation GEF/Ecuador
Galapagos Master Plan - Wind Projects
Public
Baltra and Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos
All of them
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
Cooperation Agreement with the State
Time stated in the Terms of Reference N/A N/A N/A
Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
World Bank Cooperation Program BM / Ecuador
PROMEC Program - Photovoltaic Systems
Public Esmeraldas and Napo Provinces
All of them Loan
Cooperation Agreement with the State
Time stated in the Terms of Reference
N/A N/A N/A Bilateral Cooperation Program
project completed
Eximbank from China
Direct bilateral cooperation China / Ecuador
Investment Projects - Hydropower plants
Public National Construction and start up
Loan (6 a 7 %)
Cooperation Agreement with the State
12 years N/A 85% N/A Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
Eximbank from Russia
Direct bilateral cooperation Russia / Ecuador
Investment Projects - Hydropower plants
Public National Construction and start up
Loan
Cooperation Agreement with the State
N/A N/A N/A N/A Bilateral Cooperation Program
Resource management
European Commission
Eurostar program
Energy Program, Education and Communication
Public National All of them
Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
Cooperation Agreement with the State 5 years N/A N/A
4.8 million Euros
Bilateral Cooperation Program
In final stages of development
Source: Own Development
30
Case of Ecuador - Part III
4. Support mechanisms 4.1. Support mechanisms in Ecuador In the following section is mentioned the support mechanisms that were identified in the subject of financing renewable energyprojects in Ecuador: 4.1.1. Public Policies:
The Ecuadorian government approved a law called the "Organic Law of National Public Procurement System," which in its Article 3 regulates the contracts that are financed with loans and through international cooperations. As the article mentions: "Contracts Financed with Loans and International Cooperation: - In the contracts to be financed, subject to agreement, with funds from multilateral lending agencies of which Ecuador is a member, or in contracts that are financed with refundable funds or non-refundable funding from government to government or international cooperation agencies, the agreed shall be observed in the respective agreements. Matters not covered by such agreements shall be governed by the provisions of this Act.¨ (Official Record, 2008). 4.1.2. Tax Incentives: In the Law of the Electric Sector, the Ecuadorian State commits to promote the development and the use of unconventional energy resources. That is why, in this law in Chapter XI, Article 67, it is included certain tariff advantages and tax exemptions to income; in this manner, to encourage energy production based on renewable energy such as solar, wind, geothermal, biomass, etc. However, only few projects have benefited from the provisions of the above-mentioned article, probably due to a lack of knowledge of the private sector or the promoters of renewable energy projects regarding this benefit. 4.1.3. Clean Development Mechanism (CDM): The Kyoto Protocol, to which Ecuador is a signatory, has the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) as one of its alternatives for global environmental protection. This tool allows the trade of greenhouse gases pollution reduction certificates (GHG). Through this mechanism, the developing countries like Ecuador can implement projects that avoid the emissions of GHG. In this manner, once these projects are certified, these represent an environmental and economic contribution. The first, due to the reduction of GHG emissions; the second, considering that reduction emission certificates (REC´s) are generated and these are sold in the international carbon market, thus helping improve the financial indices of the project such as the NPV (net present value) and the IRR (internal return rate). Ecuador has registered in the CDM executive entity (within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change - UNFCCC) 16 CDM projects, of which
31
Case of Ecuador - Part III
seven (44%) are hydropower projects (6 run-of-the-river hydroelectric power plants and 1with a new reservoir), four (25%) are biogas projects (which prevent the spread of methane in the atmosphere generated by the fermentation of organic waste), one is co-generation using biomass as fuel (biogases), two are landfills (prevents the spread of methane from garbage), one is of generating electricity with wind turbines and one to avoid generating methane. The amount received for the negotiation of licenses (CRE's) helps the project owner and/or administrator to complete the balance sheet of the initiative and in many times it frequently helps to reach or surpass the breakeven point; thus, making the project be profitable and feasible (URC, 2011)
5. Successful Cases
The majority of the projects of energy generation with renewable sources are developed by state-owned entities, as part of its policy of extending the energy coverage, financing the priority projects and environmental protection. However, there are some experiences in the private sector for energy generation to be used by own private companies (own-consumption), which have used conventional financing mechanisms: own funding and private bank loans. With this background, the following section gives detail of the successful cases in the use of the financing mechanisms and in the use of the support mechanisms: 5.1 Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
This is the most common mechanism for the implementation of projects and state programs that seek to increase the energy supply in the country, using funds available from bilateral cooperation agreements, which are established between the National Government and the Multilateral Entity or the Cooperating Country. An example of this mechanism is the European Commission, which sought to implement the Euro-Solar Program developed by MEER. This program has the objective of providing electrification to schools with photovoltaic (PV) systems, and community centers, in this manner to install communication centers (Internet) and health centers in the isolated provinces of Esmeraldas, Guayas, Orellana, Sucumbios, Napo, Pastaza and Morona Santiago. This project takes place in 91 rural communities and the electricity will be generated by PV systems so that the computers (PCs), projector, refrigerator for medicines and a water purifier can function. The resources are used to finance: studies/research, technical consultancy, procurement and installation of equipment, training, workshops, operation and maintenance.
32
Case of Ecuador - Part III
The project has a regional scope considering that several countries are involved (Ecuador and also 7 other countries of Latin America). The project initiated in 2006 with the signing of a cooperation agreement by each of the beneficiaries countries. The activities are foreseen to be completed by the year 2011. This project has been highlighted as one of the most successful cases not only because of the financial support granted, but also due to the technical cooperation that was provided and the exchange of experiences and knowledge between the 8 participating countries. Additionally, the training and thus preparation that the community inhabitants received in order to manage the communication systems via internet, will allow the communities to have a modern tool to encourage the development of its inhabitants. Similarly, once the health center with the refrigerator is up and running, people (especially children) will have guaranteed access to vaccines and may consume safer water (MEER, 2010). With these benefits, the project is definitely contributing to reach asustainable development within the country. 3.4.2 Bank loan With the creation of the Bank of the Social Security Institute (BIESS), the country and its population have at its disposal a mechanism for financing national investment projects of state-owned entities. The process and the requirements for applying for funding to BIESS are the following: present the economic feasibility study of the initiative and the financing commitment of the counterpart, which is usually the company in charge of the project or the State (Ministry of Finance). The resources allocated by the Bank are used for the stages of construction and start up/intiation of the project. Until the present date (June 2011), the allocation of resources has been approved for the project of electricity generation through the explotation of
thermal resources (power station Quevedo - 100MW, and Santa Elena power station - 90MW)2. Approval of resources for the construction of the Villonaco Wind Plant in Loja is also being managed by CELEC EP. In the case of the above-mentioned thermal plants, the BIESS financed 60% of total required investment, and charges a 7.5% interest rate for a term of 12 years, counting since the beginning of the commercial operation of the thermal plants (CELEC EP, 2010). In the case of electricity generation, the loan will be recovered through the "tariff," which will be chared to users of electricity. That is the reason why for these types of funding it is required the approval of CONELEC.
2 Although this line of funding has only financed until today projects for electricity generation from thermal resources, this line of funding has been mentioned and analyzed in this paper because of its great relevance and potential to fund renewable energy projects in the near future.
33
Case of Ecuador - Part III
With the availability of this financial arrangement, the country can benefit by using national capital in investment projects defined as priorities by the Stat. The entire population and other actors will benefit from this mechanism considering that the economic benefits are for both: investors and for counterpart such as private energy companies, the State, and others. 5.3. Bank loan and self financing Another mechanism that should be highlighted, for the case of private companies, is the loan which is granted by the national private banking system. This type of financing is usually combined with the own resources of the project and/or company to finance the construction and start up of co-generation (electricity and steam) plants, products that are used in the production process. A concrete example of this mechanism is the Cogeneration Project to manufacture
plywood, implemented by ENDESA. This project used wood waste (biomass) in the production process. This initiative includes a generator of 1,000 kW. It uses waste as raw material, which before the project it was considered trash and was material that was thrown away by the company and burned, causing environmental pollution. With the use of biomass residues, the bunker and the electricity purchased from Empresa Electrica Quito (EEQ) was replaced. In this manner, the generated electricity is produced at a lower cost, allowing savings that makes possible the payment of the investment. The Bank loan obtained covered 50% of the total investment, with an interest rate of 11% at a 5 years term. The company reported a positive cost – benefit relation due to the investment, with the following benefits: green seal for export, reduction of pollution, total replacement of the bunker used for the boiler, reduction in the purchase of electricity to the EEQ, no waste disposal (MEER, 2010). This experience has been higlighted because it can be an example to be followed by the productive sector that is dedicated to the generation of agro-industrial biomass waste, which will be polluting elements that bring added value to the production process. Good experiences are important to demonstrate that these investments have positive returns for the employer and allow the country to generate energy from renewable resources for the benefit of the environment.
5.4. Co-generation project under the CDM: The most representative case of the 16 projects registered in the UNFCCC is the Co-
generation Project of the Company ECOLECTRIC in the Ingenio Azucaro Valdez, which uses the raw material for the co-generation during harvest season and also uses biogases waste in times where there is no production of sugarcane.
34
Case of Ecuador - Part III
This project has an installed generating capacity of 27.5 MW of electricity, which is used in the production process of the sugar mill and the generating surpluses are sold to the National Interconnected System. This project was financed with funds of the company and with the sale of emissions reduction certificates. Of the 16 projects approved, this one is highlighted because of the significant benefits it provides to the sugar mills of the consortium to which it belongs, at the level of comprehensive use of the produced bagasse, and in the generation of steam and electricity for the process, with the additional benefit of the sale of surpluses (MEER, 2010). In countries with a strong sugar industry, this contribution to the generation of electricity is representative and allows saving fossil fuels. This example could have a significant replication in other similar agro-industries, thus generating benefits for the economy, society and the environment. 5.5. Centralized International Cooperation: The National Government decided to centralize the coordination and negotiation of all international cooperation received in the country in a single state –owned entity, making it possible to optimize the benefits of programs or initiatives, particularly in the promotion and installation of renewable energy projects. This entity is the Technical
Secretariat for International Cooperation (SETECI. The fact that a government entity is at the head of a negotiation facilitates the signing of bilateral agreements and the allocation of state resources as counterpart of the projects. Similarly, this type of negotiation facilitates the definition of refundable loans considering that the State garantess for the debts. That is how agreements have been set with institutions from Germany, Korea and Japan, and other financial endeavours are under negotiation: loans with "Eximbank" from China, Korea and Russia (SETECI, 2011). 5.6. Public Procurement: The Ecuadorian State, through the Organic Law of National Public Procurement System has created the conditions for transparency in recruitment processes for projects or technical assistance. The various state agencies must invite publicly through the Public Procurement Portal (http://www.compraspublicas.gov.ec/) to individuals or consulting firms to submit their proposals and be the ones responsible for the projects, equipment supplies or specific studies.
35
Case of Ecuador - Part III
This mechanism allows opening and democratization of the selection process of companies, or consulting team and provides the State the possibility of a proper and consistent monitoring and control of procurement processes. It is highlighted this procedure adopted by the State, because it conceptually allows for broad participation of society in the government initiatives by providing strategic and infrastructure studies of the energy sector. This mechanism also applies for renewable rnergy projects which are developed by the State. An example of such case is the PERVA Program (developed by CELEC EP), which was uploaded to the public procurement website bid to participate in various projects assigned to communities in the Amazonia (Instituto NAcional de Contratación Pública, 2010). 6. Barriers 6.1 Regulatory Framework: The existing regulation for the concessions of power generation by the private sector is not attractive to investors. They claim a lack of legal certainty to ensure an adequate return on capital, because there is no guarantee of purchase, neither fixed percentage of return on invested resources. Only in April 2011, CONELEC established two new regulations, the 003/11 - related terms, and the 004/11 which establishes requirements, prices, validity period and the framework for disposal of non-conventional renewable resources. This new regulation replaces the 009/06, which set prices for renewable energies. 6.2 Information on current financial mechanisms: It is necessary that State -owned entities that are responsible for the promotion of renewable energies provide information regarding the financial mechanisms in all public forums. In this manner, to facilitate the implementation of renewable energy projects and government priorities for modern energy supplies to the population that is lacking of these services. The lack of knowledge of the existing options of both public and private resources, and of the promotion policies could be the cause why certain project executors or isolated populations do not implement renewable energy projects. 6.3Power Generation Potential with Renewable Resources: There isn`t a detailed study of the potential of renewable resources which could be used for the generation of energy, using technology options such as co-generation with biomass residues, obtaining electricity and steam, or for generation of biogas digesters and biofertilizer.
36
Case of Ecuador - Part III
As part of its production process, several agribusinesses generate a high percentage of biomass residues, which if not used in the production chain these become pollutants and thus need to be thrown away. This occurs in the paper, food, tobacco, timber, oil industry, etc. A proper study of existing waste, location, quality and content of solids, together with an information campaign aimed to entrepreneurs in the productive sector could be useful to develop a catalog of projects of interest to businesses owners that generate waste, thus providing an adequate waste treatment and obtaining its own energy. 6.4. State entities support communitary organizations: The high potential that exists for the production of materials to obtain biofuels makes it crucial and necessary the support of government entities in the non-organized productive sectors or in those where there is low capacity of production. This support needs to be in the subject matters of organization and incentives, which can allow the private sector to establish cooperatives and/or associations, which will allow the private companies to participate in government initiatives for the provision of raw material for the industrialization of ethanol or vegetable oil as fuel. The lack of incentives and organizational capacity of small producers makes these actors be relegated and thus not taken into consideration in government initiatives.
6.5. Focalization of financial mechanisms for the public sector: With regards to the financial mechanisms, as presented in the sections from above, there are several avaible options for developing projects or initiatives by state entities. In the case of the private sector, there are not many and almost no options of funding, due to the low levels of interest there is in this sector to undertake projects for energy generation. 6.6. Lack of knowledge of CDM among potential project developers:
It is necessary that technical institutions responsible for the promotion and control of this important mechanism carry out awareness campaigns to disseminate information regarding the benefits that could be achieved by incorporating CDM processes in the project. It is important to make sure that the dissemination of this opportunity to develop projects and energy efficiency is widely known at the university level, in the productive sector, and within professional associations in the country. Having only 16 registered projects with the UNFCCC allows us to conclude that much remains to be done at the level of information strategies and institutional support to develop new projects.
37
Case of Ecuador - Part III
6.7. Subsidies to commercial fossil energy: In Ecuador, the commercial fossil fuels (liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), gasoline and diesel) which are widely used by the population are subsidized. This makes the costs of these energy sources very low and thus these products are very easy to find on the market, therefore descintivizing the use of alternative technologies based on the use of renewable resources, which by its commercial cost are hard to purchase. Consequently, the fuels that are used for transport, electricity generation or production of handicraft goods have costs that are extremely low in comparison to renewable energies; thus making this last energy source unable to compete. 7. Conclusions From the information discussed in previous chapters, it can be mentioned the following conclusions:
• The financial mechanisms available in Ecuador are:
o Non-Refundable State Investment o Bank loans o Investment with Venture Capital Funds o Own investment o Non-Refundable Cooperation Fund
• The most widely used mechanism in the country is the non-refundable state investment, under which the State aims to expand the coverage of energy services to all the communities in the country. That is why most of the projects are carried out with government’s resources.
• The Government has established agreements / cooperative arrangements with several multilateral organizations, aid agencies and donor countries. This is benefiting the country due to the transfer of experience, technical assistance and funding available for renewable energy development.
• There is not much private sector participation in renewable energy projects because of a lack of clarity in the existing regulatory framework and investors require security for their investment: safety when buying products and a price that guarantees a minimum return.
• The coverage of energy services is quite significant in the country; only certain areas that are located in rural areas still require service. This is also another reason why private sectors investors are not interested in investing in this sector.
38
Case of Ecuador - Part III
• It is necessary to undertake an awareness campaign and disseminate more information regarding the exsiting financial mechanisms that are available for developing renewable energy projects in the country, so that project executors can access such benefits.
• CDM is not very well known among projects executors in the productive sectors, so that they can access the carbon market and its viable initiatives.
• There is a high potential of biomass waste that can be used for productive enterprises that generate these. However, due to a lack of technical knowledge the biomass waste is not being reused in the process. The cases the co-generation and bio-digesters have demonstrated that this type of projects have a positive cost-benefit relationship.
• There are a lot of small producers of raw materials for the production of biofuels that require organizational support to become major players in this new market without requiring substantial funding.
39
Case of Ecuador - Part III
8. Bibliography
CELEC EP (Electricity Corporation of Ecuador), Information provided in interviews
with officials Marcelo Espín and Mario Brito, Quito, December 16, 2010.
CONELEC (National Electricity Council), Electrification Master Plan in Ecuador 2009
– 2020, Quito, 2008
Official Gazette, Supplement No. 395, Monday August 4, 2008, Page 3. MEER (Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy), 2008p, Politics and Strategies
for Chanes in the Energy Matrix of Ecuador, May 2008 MEER (Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy), Information provided in
interviews with officials. Patricia Recalde, Paula Sánchez, Edison Chicaiza, Gabriel
Rengifo, Quito, November 29, 2010.
URC (UNEP Risoe Centre), www.cd4cdm.org, CDM Pipeline Overview October, 2010
CONELEC (National Electricity Council), Rural Electrification Program for 15,000
homes in the Amazon (PERV), Quito, 2010.
Ministry of Economy and Finance of Ecuador, Feasibility approved to Hydropower
Projects for FEISEH Resources, Press Release No.063, Quito, August 27, 2007.
MEER (Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy), Presentation of Euro solar
Project Results: Renewable Energy for Development, 91 Communities, Quito 2010.
SETECI (Technical Secretariat for International Cooperation), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ecuador, Catalogue of the International Cooperation Offer, http://www.ageci.gov.ec/, Quito, 2011