ecosystem services in the ndbr tara hooper plymouth marine laboratory [email protected]

17
Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory [email protected]

Upload: athena-joplin

Post on 01-Apr-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Ecosystem services in the NDBR

Tara HooperPlymouth Marine [email protected]

Page 2: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Using Ecosystem Services in Management

Understand the level of key services delivered by NDBR habitats

Evaluate how service delivery changes under different management scenarios

Compare outcomes and consider trade-offs

Page 3: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Understanding the delivery of key servicesHabitat Service Benefit

Nursery habitat

Waste processing

Carbon burial

Page 4: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Our approach

Step 1 – Literature review

• water depth

What do juvenile fish need?

• sediment type

• food sources

Page 6: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Our approach

Step 2 – Local survey data

What substrates/species are present?

• PML (1973)• National Museums & Galleries of Wales (2003)

• RWE (2011)• Environment Agency (2008, 2010, 2013)

Step 3 – Link to habitat typesTo allow services to be mapped across the NDBR

Page 7: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Findings

Good links between sites and habitats for remediation

Links between biological traits and habitats not clear

Fisheries species food preferences are too general

but….. only where species information is present

so........ carbon sequestration mapped by just substrate

so........ not included in the assessmentand..... mapped by just substrate/depth

Hoping for validation through input from fishers

Page 8: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Estuary: Waste remediation

Page 9: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Offshore: Waste remediation

To follow…….

Page 10: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Offshore: Carbon sequestration

Page 11: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Estuary: Carbon sequestration

Page 12: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Offshore: Nursery habitats

Bass Sole/Plaice

Cod Skates/rays

Lobster

To follow…..

Page 13: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Estuary: Nursery habitats

Bass Lobster Sole/Plaice

Cod Skates/rays

Page 14: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Aggregation and trade offs

How should we represent the occurrence of multiple services in the same place?

What happens when the effects of management interventions occur in opposite directions for different services?

Page 15: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Aggregation and trade offs

Just an EXAMPLE – based on equal weighting

Page 16: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Weighting ecosystem services

How important are the ecosystem services to you?

Carbon sequestrationRemediation of wasteNursery habitat

TOTAL

Please complete the score card

Ensure your scores add up to 12

……..……..……..

12

4

4

4

0

12

0

3

3

6

Page 17: Ecosystem services in the NDBR Tara Hooper Plymouth Marine Laboratory tarh@pml.ac.uk

Weighting ecosystem services

Please also complete the additional questions

How do you rank the fisheries?

Bass

Cod

Lobster

Rank 1 – 5 or use equal scores

……..……..……..Sole/

plaice……..Skates/

rays……..

1

2

5

3

4

1

1

3

3

3

1

1

1

1

1

1 = most important 5 = least important