economic impact of bioinformatics - esp · bioinformatics is the application of information...
TRANSCRIPT
Economic Impact of Bioinformatics
Robert J. RobbinsFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
1100 Fairview Avenue North, LV-101Seattle, Washington 98109
[email protected](206) 667 2920
http://www.esp.org/rjr/atcc.pdf
Abstract
Biotechnology, the "magic technology" of the 21st Century, depends on genomic research and genomics inturn depends upon information technology. Computers are the instruments that allow us to "see" genomes,just as electron microscopes allow us to see viruses.
When information technology becomes critical for any activity, the economics of that field changessubstantially. In the last 25 years, field after field of human endeavor has been transformed when therelentless effects of Moore's Law, delivering exponentially better computers at exponentially lower prices,eventually provide sufficient computational power at affordable prices.
Bioinformatics is the application of information technology to the problems of biology. With $2500 desktopPCs now delivering more raw computing power than the first Cray, bioinformatics is rapidly becoming thecritical technology for 21st Century biology.
DNA is legitimately seen as a biological mass-storage device, making bioinformatics a sine qua non foreffective genomic research. Others areas of biological investigation are also information rich -- for example,an exhaustive tabulation of the Earth's biodiversity would involve a cross-index of the millions of knownspecies against the approximately 500,000,000,000,000 square meters of the Earth's surface.
Access to bioinformatics support and logistics skills are emerging as rate limiting steps for much biomedicalresearch. As 21st Century biology becomes increasing dependent upon bioinformatics and logistics,competitive dynamics will change, possibly leading to the movement of substantial areas of biologicalresearch from the public to the private sector.
Abstract
Biotechnology, the "magic technology" of the 21st Century, depends on genomic research and genomics inturn depends upon information technology. Computers are the instruments that allow us to "see" genomes,just as electron microscopes allow us to see viruses.
When information technology becomes critical for any activity, the economics of that field changessubstantially. In the last 25 years, field after field of human endeavor has been transformed when therelentless effects of Moore's Law, delivering exponentially better computers at exponentially lower prices,eventually provide sufficient computational power at affordable prices.
Bioinformatics is the application of information technology to the problems of biology. With $2500 desktopPCs now delivering more raw computing power than the first Cray, bioinformatics is rapidly becoming thecritical technology for 21st Century biology.
DNA is legitimately seen as a biological mass-storage device, making bioinformatics a sine qua non foreffective genomic research. Others areas of biological investigation are also information rich -- for example,an exhaustive tabulation of the Earth's biodiversity would involve a cross-index of the millions of knownspecies against the approximately 500,000,000,000,000 square meters of the Earth's surface.
Access to bioinformatics support and logistics skills are emerging as rate limiting steps for much biomedicalresearch. As 21st Century biology becomes increasing dependent upon bioinformatics and logistics,competitive dynamics will change, possibly leading to the movement of substantial areas of biologicalresearch from the public to the private sector.
3
Topics
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
4
Topics
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
5
Topics
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
6
Topics
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• 21st-Century biology will be based on bioinformaticsand powered by logistics skills.
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• 21st-Century biology will be based on bioinformaticsand powered by logistics skills.
7
Topics
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• 21st-Century biology will be based on bioinformaticsand powered by logistics skills.
• Currently, support for public bio-informationinfrastructure seems inadequate.
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• 21st-Century biology will be based on bioinformaticsand powered by logistics skills.
• Currently, support for public bio-informationinfrastructure seems inadequate.
8
Topics
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• 21st-Century biology will be based on bioinformaticsand powered by logistics skills.
• Currently, support for public bio-informationinfrastructure seems inadequate.
• In the future, much current public research may moveinto the private sector.
• Biotechnology will be the magic technology of the 21stCentury.
• Moore’s Law constantly transforms IT (and everythingelse).
• Information Technology (IT) has a special relationshipwith biology, especially genetics and genomics.
• 21st-Century biology will be based on bioinformaticsand powered by logistics skills.
• Currently, support for public bio-informationinfrastructure seems inadequate.
• In the future, much current public research may moveinto the private sector.
Biotechnology
21st Century Magic
10
Magic
To a person from 1897, much currenttechnology would seem like magic.
11
Magic
To a person from 1897, much currenttechnology would seem like magic.
What technology of 2097 would seemmagical to a person from 1997?
12
Magic
To a person from 1897, much currenttechnology would seem like magic.
What technology of 2097 would seemmagical to a person from 1997?
Candidate: Biotechnology so advancedthat the distinction between living andnon-living is blurred.
Candidate: Biotechnology so advancedthat the distinction between living andnon-living is blurred.
Moore’s Law
Transforms InfoTech(and everything else)
14
Moore’s Law: The Statement
Every eighteen months, thenumber of transistors that canbe placed on a chip doubles.
Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel...Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel...
15
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Time
100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
16
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Time
100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
P
17
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
P
18
Moore’s Law: The Effect
Three Phases of Novel IT Applications
• It’s Impossible
Three Phases of Novel IT Applications
• It’s Impossible
19
Moore’s Law: The Effect
Three Phases of Novel IT Applications
• It’s Impossible
• It’s Impractical
Three Phases of Novel IT Applications
• It’s Impossible
• It’s Impractical
20
Moore’s Law: The Effect
Three Phases of Novel IT Applications
• It’s Impossible
• It’s Impractical
• It’s Overdue
Three Phases of Novel IT Applications
• It’s Impossible
• It’s Impractical
• It’s Overdue
21
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
P
22
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
P
23
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
P
24
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
D
P
C
25
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
D
P
C
26
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
D
P
AA
C
27
Moore’s Law: The EffectP
erfo
rman
ce(c
on
stan
t co
st)
Cos
t(c
on
stan
t p
erf
orm
an
ce)
Time
100,000 100,000
10,000
1,000
100
10
10,000
1,000
100
10
D
P
A
C
28
Moore’s Law: The Effect
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
29
Moore’s Law: The Effect
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• As improved uses of technology aredeveloped, “business” processes change.
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• As improved uses of technology aredeveloped, “business” processes change.
30
Moore’s Law: The Effect
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• As improved uses of technology aredeveloped, “business” processes change.
• Ultimately, access to appropriate ITbecomes essential for simple existence.
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• As improved uses of technology aredeveloped, “business” processes change.
• Ultimately, access to appropriate ITbecomes essential for simple existence.
31
Moore’s Law: The Effect
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• As improved uses of technology aredeveloped, “business” processes change.
• Ultimately, access to appropriate ITbecomes essential for simple existence.
• The first to understand and deploy new ITcapabilities often seize great competitiveadvantage.
• As improved uses of technology aredeveloped, “business” processes change.
• Ultimately, access to appropriate ITbecomes essential for simple existence.
Relevance for biology?Relevance for biology?
32
Cost (constant performance)
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000 UniversityPurchase
33
Cost (constant performance)
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000 UniversityPurchase
DepartmentPurchase
34
Cost (constant performance)
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
RO1 GrantPurchase
UniversityPurchase
DepartmentPurchase
35
Cost (constant performance)
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
PersonalPurchase
RO1 GrantPurchase
UniversityPurchase
DepartmentPurchase
36
Cost (constant performance)
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
1,000
10,000
100,000
1,000,000
10,000,000
PersonalPurchase
RO1 GrantPurchase
UniversityPurchase
DepartmentPurchase
UnplannedPurchases
IT-BiologySynergismIT-BiologySynergism
38
IT is Special
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
39
IT is Special
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
• allows the manipulation of hugeamounts of highly complex data
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
• allows the manipulation of hugeamounts of highly complex data
40
IT is Special
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
• allows the manipulation of hugeamounts of highly complex data
• is incredibly plastic
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
• allows the manipulation of hugeamounts of highly complex data
• is incredibly plastic(programming and poetry are both exercises in pure thought)
41
IT is Special
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
• allows the manipulation of hugeamounts of highly complex data
• is incredibly plastic
Information Technology:
• affects the performance and themanagement of tasks
• allows the manipulation of hugeamounts of highly complex data
• is incredibly plastic(programming and poetry are both exercises in pure thought)
• improves exponentially(Moore’s Law)
42
Biology is Special
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
43
Biology is Special
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
44
Biology is Special
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
45
Biology is Special
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
• high (digital) information content
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
• high (digital) information content
46
Biology is Special
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
• high (digital) information content
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
• high (digital) information content
No law of large numbers...No law of large numbers...
47
Biology is Special
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
• high (digital) information content
Life is Characterized by:
• individuality
• historicity
• contingency
• high (digital) information content
No law of large numbers, since everyliving thing is genuinely unique.No law of large numbers, since everyliving thing is genuinely unique.
48
IT-Biology Synergism
• Physics needs calculus, the method formanipulating information aboutstatistically large numbers of vanishinglysmall, independent, equivalent things.
• Physics needs calculus, the method formanipulating information aboutstatistically large numbers of vanishinglysmall, independent, equivalent things.
49
IT-Biology Synergism
• Physics needs calculus, the method formanipulating information aboutstatistically large numbers of vanishinglysmall, independent, equivalent things.
• Biology needs information technology, themethod for manipulating informationabout large numbers of dependent,historically contingent, individual things.
• Physics needs calculus, the method formanipulating information aboutstatistically large numbers of vanishinglysmall, independent, equivalent things.
• Biology needs information technology, themethod for manipulating informationabout large numbers of dependent,historically contingent, individual things.
50
Biology is Special
For it is in relation to the statistical point of viewthat the structure of the vital parts of livingorganisms differs so entirely from that of anypiece of matter that we physicists and chemistshave ever handled in our laboratories ormentally at our writing desks.
For it is in relation to the statistical point of viewthat the structure of the vital parts of livingorganisms differs so entirely from that of anypiece of matter that we physicists and chemistshave ever handled in our laboratories ormentally at our writing desks.
Erwin Schrödinger. 1944. What is Life.Erwin Schrödinger. 1944. What is Life.
51
Genetics as Code
[The] chromosomes ... contain in some kind of code-script the entire pattern of the individual's futuredevelopment and of its functioning in the mature state.... [By] code-script we mean that the all-penetratingmind, once conceived by Laplace, to which everycausal connection lay immediately open, could tellfrom their structure whether [an egg carrying them]would develop, under suitable conditions, into a blackcock or into a speckled hen, into a fly or a maize plant,a rhodo-dendron, a beetle, a mouse, or a woman.
[The] chromosomes ... contain in some kind of code-script the entire pattern of the individual's futuredevelopment and of its functioning in the mature state.... [By] code-script we mean that the all-penetratingmind, once conceived by Laplace, to which everycausal connection lay immediately open, could tellfrom their structure whether [an egg carrying them]would develop, under suitable conditions, into a blackcock or into a speckled hen, into a fly or a maize plant,a rhodo-dendron, a beetle, a mouse, or a woman.
Erwin Schrödinger. 1944. What is Life.Erwin Schrödinger. 1944. What is Life.
52
One Human SequenceWe now know thatSchrödinger’s mysterioushuman “code-script”consists of 3.3 billionbase pairs of DNA.
53
One Human Sequence
Typed in 10-pitch font, one human sequence would stretch for morethan 5,000 miles. Digitally formatted, it could be stored on one CD-ROM. Biologically encoded, it fits easily within a single cell.
We now know thatSchrödinger’s mysterioushuman “code-script”consists of 3.3 billionbase pairs of DNA.
54
Bio-digital Information
DNA is a highly efficient digital storage device:
• There is more mass-storage capacity in theDNA of a side of beef than in all the hard drivesof all the world’s computers.
DNA is a highly efficient digital storage device:
• There is more mass-storage capacity in theDNA of a side of beef than in all the hard drivesof all the world’s computers.
55
Bio-digital Information
DNA is a highly efficient digital storage device:
• There is more mass-storage capacity in theDNA of a side of beef than in all the hard drivesof all the world’s computers.
• Storing all of the (redundant) information in allof the world’s DNA on computer hard diskswould require that the entire surface of the Earthbe covered to a depth of three miles in Conner1.0 gB drives.
DNA is a highly efficient digital storage device:
• There is more mass-storage capacity in theDNA of a side of beef than in all the hard drivesof all the world’s computers.
• Storing all of the (redundant) information in allof the world’s DNA on computer hard diskswould require that the entire surface of the Earthbe covered to a depth of three miles in Conner1.0 gB drives.
Genomics:An ExampleGenomics:
An Example
57
Human Genome Project - Goals– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the human
genome;– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the human
genome;
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
58
Human Genome Project - Goals– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the human
genome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the humangenome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
59
Human Genome Project - Goals– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the human
genome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– determination of the complete sequence of human DNA andof the DNA of selected model organisms;
– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the humangenome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– determination of the complete sequence of human DNA andof the DNA of selected model organisms;
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
60
Human Genome Project - Goals– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the human
genome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– determination of the complete sequence of human DNA andof the DNA of selected model organisms;
– development of capabilities for collecting, storing,distributing, and analyzing the data produced;
– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the humangenome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– determination of the complete sequence of human DNA andof the DNA of selected model organisms;
– development of capabilities for collecting, storing,distributing, and analyzing the data produced;
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
61
Human Genome Project - Goals– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the human
genome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– determination of the complete sequence of human DNA andof the DNA of selected model organisms;
– development of capabilities for collecting, storing,distributing, and analyzing the data produced;
– creation of appropriate technologies necessary to achievethese objectives.
– construction of a high-resolution genetic map of the humangenome;
– production of a variety of physical maps of all humanchromosomes and of the DNA of selected modelorganisms;
– determination of the complete sequence of human DNA andof the DNA of selected model organisms;
– development of capabilities for collecting, storing,distributing, and analyzing the data produced;
– creation of appropriate technologies necessary to achievethese objectives.
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
USDOE. 1990. Understanding Our Genetic Inheritance.The U.S. Human Genome Project: The First Five Years.
62
Infrastructure and the HGP
Progress towards all of the [Genome Project]goals will require the establishment of well-funded centralized facilities, including a stockcenter for the cloned DNA fragmentsgenerated in the mapping and sequencingeffort and a data center for the computer-basedcollection and distribution of large amounts ofDNA sequence information.
Progress towards all of the [Genome Project]goals will require the establishment of well-funded centralized facilities, including a stockcenter for the cloned DNA fragmentsgenerated in the mapping and sequencingeffort and a data center for the computer-basedcollection and distribution of large amounts ofDNA sequence information.
National Research Council. 1988. Mapping and Sequencing theHuman Genome. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. p. 3
National Research Council. 1988. Mapping and Sequencing theHuman Genome. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. p. 3
63
GenBank Totals (Release 103)
DIVISION
Phage Sequences (PHG)Viral Sequences (VRL)
Bacteria (BCT)
Plant, Fungal, and Algal Sequences (PLN)
Invertebrate Sequences (INV)
Rodent Sequences (ROD)Primate Sequences (PRI1–2)
Other Mammals (MAM)Other Vertebrate Sequences (VRT)
High-Throughput Genome Sequences (HTG)
Genome Survey Sequences (GSS)Structural RNA Sequences (RNA)
Sequence Tagged Sites Sequences (STS)Patent Sequences (PAT)
Synthetic Sequences (SYN)Unannotated Sequences (UNA)
EST1-17
TOTALS
Entries
1,313 45,355 38,023
44,553
29,657
36,967 75,587 12,744 17,713
1,120
42,628 4,802 52,824 87,767 2,577 2,480
1,269,737
1,765,847
Base Pairs
2,138,810 44,484,848 88,576,641
92,259,434
105,703,550
45,437,309 134,944,314 12,358,310 17,040,159
72,064,395
22,783,326 2,487,397 18,161,532 27,593,724 5,698,945 1,933,676
466,634,317
1,160,300,687
Per Cent
0.184%3.834%7.634%
7.951%
9.110%
3.916%11.630%
1.065%1.469%
6.211%
1.964%0.214%1.565%2.378%0.491%0.167%
40.217%
100.000%
Per Cent
0.074%2.568%2.153%
2.523%
1.679%
2.093%4.280%0.722%1.003%
0.063%
2.414%0.272%2.991%4.970%0.146%0.140%
71.905%
100.000%
64
Base Pairs in GenBank
0
2 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
4 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
6 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
8 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,2 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105
GenBank Release Numbers
9493929190898887 95 96 97
65
Base Pairs in GenBank
0
2 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
4 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
6 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
8 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,2 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105
GenBank Release Numbers
9493929190898887 95 96 97
Growth in GenBank is exponential.More data were added in the last tenweeks than were added in the first tenyears of the project.
Growth in GenBank is exponential.More data were added in the last tenweeks than were added in the first tenyears of the project.
66
Base Pairs in GenBank
0
2 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
4 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
6 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
8 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,2 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105
GenBank Release Numbers
9493929190898887 95 96 97
Growth in GenBank is exponential.More data were added in the last tenweeks than were added in the first tenyears of the project.
Growth in GenBank is exponential.More data were added in the last tenweeks than were added in the first tenyears of the project.
At this rate, what’s next...At this rate, what’s next...
67
ABI Bass-o-Matic Sequencer
In with the sample, out with the sequence...
TGCGCATCGCGTATCGATAG
speed
gB/sec
EnterDefrost
7 8 9
4 5 6
1 2 3
0
+
-
68
What’s Really Next
The post-genome era in biologicalresearch will take for granted readyaccess to huge amounts of genomicdata.
The challenge will be understandingthose data and using the understandingto solve real-world problems...
69
Base Pairs in GenBank (Percent Increase)
0 .0 0 %
1 0 .0 0 %
2 0 .0 0 %
3 0 .0 0 %
4 0 .0 0 %
5 0 .0 0 %
6 0 .0 0 %
7 0 .0 0 %
8 0 .0 0 %
9 0 .0 0 %
1 0 0 .0 0 %
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96
Year
Percent Increaseaverage = 56%
Percent Increaseaverage = 56%
70
Projected Base Pairs
11 0
1 0 01 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 01 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
90 95 0 5 10 15 20 25
Year
Assumed annual growth rate: 50%(less than current rate)
71
Projected Base Pairs
11 0
1 0 01 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 01 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
90 95 0 5 10 15 20 25
Year
Assumed annual growth rate: 50%(less than current rate)
Is this crazy?One trillion bp by 2015100 trillion by 2025
Is this crazy?One trillion bp by 2015100 trillion by 2025
72
Projected Base Pairs
11 0
1 0 01 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 01 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 01 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
1 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0
90 95 0 5 10 15 20 25
Year
Is this crazy?One trillion bp by 2015100 trillion by 2025
Is this crazy?One trillion bp by 2015100 trillion by 2025
500,00050,0005,000
Maybe not...Maybe not...
Projected database size,indicated as the number ofbase pairs per individualmedical record in the US.
21st CenturyBiology
Post-Genome Era
74
The Post-Genome Era
Post-genome research involves:
• applying genomic tools and knowledge to moregeneral problems
• asking new questions, tractable only to genomicor post-genomic analysis
• moving beyond the structural genomics of thehuman genome project and into the functionalgenomics of the post-genome era
Post-genome research involves:
• applying genomic tools and knowledge to moregeneral problems
• asking new questions, tractable only to genomicor post-genomic analysis
• moving beyond the structural genomics of thehuman genome project and into the functionalgenomics of the post-genome era
75
The Post-Genome Era
Suggested definition:
• functional genomics = biology
Suggested definition:
• functional genomics = biology
76
The Post-Genome Era
An early analysis:An early analysis:
Walter Gilbert. 1991. Towards a paradigmshift in biology. Nature, 349:99.
77
Paradigm Shift in Biology
To use [the] flood of knowledge, which will pouracross the computer networks of the world,biologists not only must become computerliterate, but also change their approach to theproblem of understanding life.
To use [the] flood of knowledge, which will pouracross the computer networks of the world,biologists not only must become computerliterate, but also change their approach to theproblem of understanding life.
Walter Gilbert. 1991. Towards a paradigm shift in biology. Nature, 349:99.Walter Gilbert. 1991. Towards a paradigm shift in biology. Nature, 349:99.
78
Paradigm Shift in Biology
The new paradigm, now emerging, is that all the‘genes’ will be known (in the sense of beingresident in databases available electronically),and that the starting point of a biologicalinvestigation will be theoretical. An individualscientist will begin with a theoretical conjecture,only then turning to experiment to follow or testthat hypothesis.
The new paradigm, now emerging, is that all the‘genes’ will be known (in the sense of beingresident in databases available electronically),and that the starting point of a biologicalinvestigation will be theoretical. An individualscientist will begin with a theoretical conjecture,only then turning to experiment to follow or testthat hypothesis.
Walter Gilbert. 1991. Towards a paradigm shift in biology. Nature, 349:99.Walter Gilbert. 1991. Towards a paradigm shift in biology. Nature, 349:99.
79
Paradigm Shift in Biology
Case of Microbiology
< 5,000 known and described bacteria
5,000,000 base pairs per genome
25,000,000,000 TOTAL base pairs
If a full, annotated sequence were available for all known bacteria, the practiceof microbiology would match Gilbert’s prediction.
If a full, annotated sequence were available for all known bacteria, the practiceof microbiology would match Gilbert’s prediction.
21st CenturyBiology
The Science
81
Fundamental Dogma
The fundamental dogma of molecular biologyis that genes act to create phenotypes througha flow of information from DNA to RNA toproteins, to interactions among proteins(regulatory circuits and metabolic pathways),and ultimately to phenotypes.
Collections of individual phenotypes, ofcourse, constitute a population.
DNA
RNA
Proteins
Circuits
Phenotypes
Populations
82
Fundamental DogmaDNA
RNA
Proteins
Circuits
Phenotypes
Populations
GenBankEMBLDDBJ
MapDatabases
SwissPROTPIR
PDB
Although a few databases already existto distribute molecular information,
Although a few databases already existto distribute molecular information,
83
Fundamental DogmaDNA
RNA
Proteins
Circuits
Phenotypes
Populations
GenBankEMBLDDBJ
MapDatabases
SwissPROTPIR
PDB
Gene Expression?
Clinical Data ?
Regulatory Pathways?Metabolism?
Biodiversity?
Neuroanatomy?
Development ?
Molecular Epidemiology?
Comparative Genomics?
the post-genomic era will need manymore to collect, manage, and publishthe coming flood of new findings.
the post-genomic era will need manymore to collect, manage, and publishthe coming flood of new findings.
Although a few databases already existto distribute molecular information,
Although a few databases already existto distribute molecular information,
21st CenturyBiology
The People
85
Human Resources Issues
• Reduction in need for non-IT staff• Reduction in need for non-IT staff
86
Human Resources Issues
• Reduction in need for non-IT staff
• Increase in need for IT staff, especially“information engineers”
• Reduction in need for non-IT staff
• Increase in need for IT staff, especially“information engineers”
87
Human Resources Issues
• Reduction in need for non-IT staff
• Increase in need for IT staff, especially“information engineers”
• Reduction in need for non-IT staff
• Increase in need for IT staff, especially“information engineers”
In modern biology, a general trend is toconvert expert work into staff work andfinally into computation. New expertise isrequired to design, carry out, and interpretcontinuing work.
In modern biology, a general trend is toconvert expert work into staff work andfinally into computation. New expertise isrequired to design, carry out, and interpretcontinuing work.
88
Human Resources Issues
Elbert Branscomb: “You must recognize thatsome day you may need as many computerscientists as biologists in your labs.”
Elbert Branscomb: “You must recognize thatsome day you may need as many computerscientists as biologists in your labs.”
89
Human Resources Issues
Elbert Branscomb: “You must recognize thatsome day you may need as many computerscientists as biologists in your labs.”
Craig Venter: “At TIGR, we already havetwice as many computer scientists on ourstaff.”
Elbert Branscomb: “You must recognize thatsome day you may need as many computerscientists as biologists in your labs.”
Craig Venter: “At TIGR, we already havetwice as many computer scientists on ourstaff.”
Exchange at DOE workshop on high-throughput sequencing.Exchange at DOE workshop on high-throughput sequencing.
Funding forBio-InformationInfrastructure
Funding forBio-InformationInfrastructure
91
Call for Change
Among the many new tools that are or will be needed (for 21st-century biology), some of those having the highest priority are:
• bioinformatics
• computational biology
• functional imaging tools using biosensors and biomarkers
• transformation and transient expression technologies
• nanotechnologies
Among the many new tools that are or will be needed (for 21st-century biology), some of those having the highest priority are:
• bioinformatics
• computational biology
• functional imaging tools using biosensors and biomarkers
• transformation and transient expression technologies
• nanotechnologies
Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Biological Sciences: Report of aWorkshop. NSF-supported workshop, held 26-27 June 1995, Washington, DC.
Impact of Emerging Technologies on the Biological Sciences: Report of aWorkshop. NSF-supported workshop, held 26-27 June 1995, Washington, DC.
92
The Problem
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
93
The Problem
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
94
The Problem
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• Current levels of support for public bio-information infrastructure are too low.
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• Current levels of support for public bio-information infrastructure are too low.
95
The Problem
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• Current levels of support for public bio-information infrastructure are too low.
• Reallocation of federal funding is difficult,and subject to political pressures.
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• Current levels of support for public bio-information infrastructure are too low.
• Reallocation of federal funding is difficult,and subject to political pressures.
96
The Problem
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• Current levels of support for public bio-information infrastructure are too low.
• Reallocation of federal funding is difficult,and subject to political pressures.
• Federal-funding decision processes areponderously slow and inefficient.
• IT moves at “Internet Speed” and respondsrapidly to market forces.
• IT will play a central role in 21st Centurybiology.
• Current levels of support for public bio-information infrastructure are too low.
• Reallocation of federal funding is difficult,and subject to political pressures.
• Federal-funding decision processes areponderously slow and inefficient.
97
Federal Funding of Bio-Databases
The challenges:The challenges:
98
Federal Funding of Bio-Databases
The challenges:
• providing adequate funding levels
The challenges:
• providing adequate funding levels
99
Federal Funding of Bio-Databases
The challenges:
• providing adequate funding levels
• making timely, efficient decisions
The challenges:
• providing adequate funding levels
• making timely, efficient decisions
IT Budgets
A Reality Check
101
Rhetorical Question
Which is likely to be more complex:
• identifying, documenting, and tracking thewhereabouts of all parcels in transit in the US atone time
Which is likely to be more complex:
• identifying, documenting, and tracking thewhereabouts of all parcels in transit in the US atone time
102
Rhetorical Question
Which is likely to be more complex:
• identifying, documenting, and tracking thewhereabouts of all parcels in transit in the US atone time
• identifying, documenting, and analyzing thestructure and function of all individual genes inall economically significant organisms; thenanalyzing all significant gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in those organismsand their environments
Which is likely to be more complex:
• identifying, documenting, and tracking thewhereabouts of all parcels in transit in the US atone time
• identifying, documenting, and analyzing thestructure and function of all individual genes inall economically significant organisms; thenanalyzing all significant gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in those organismsand their environments
103
Business Factoids
United Parcel Service:
• uses two redundant 3 Terabyte (yes, 3000 GB)databases to track all packages in transit.
• has 4,000 full-time employees dedicated to IT
• spends one billion dollars per year on IT
• has an income of 1.1 billion dollars, againstrevenues of 22.4 billion dollars
United Parcel Service:
• uses two redundant 3 Terabyte (yes, 3000 GB)databases to track all packages in transit.
• has 4,000 full-time employees dedicated to IT
• spends one billion dollars per year on IT
• has an income of 1.1 billion dollars, againstrevenues of 22.4 billion dollars
104
Business ComparisonsCompany Revenues IT Budget Pct
Bristol-Myers Squibb 15,065,000,000 440,000,000 2.92 %
Pfizer 11,306,000,000 300,000,000 2.65 %
Pacific Gas & Electric 10,000,000,000 250,000,000 2.50 %
K-Mart 31,437,000,000 130,000,000 0.41 %
Wal-Mart 104,859,000,000 550,000,000 0.52 %
Sprint 14,235,000,000 873,000,000 6.13 %
MCI 18,500,000,000 1,000,000,000 5.41 %
United Parcel 22,400,000,000 1,000,000,000 4.46 %
AMR Corporation 17,753,000,000 1,368,000,000 7.71 %
IBM 75,947,000,000 4,400,000,000 5.79 %
Microsoft 11,360,000,000 510,000,000 4.49 %
Chase-Manhattan 16,431,000,000 1,800,000,000 10.95 %
Nation’s Bank 17,509,000,000 1,130,000,000 6.45 %
105
Federal Funding of Biomedical-IT
Appropriate funding level:
• approx. 5-10% of research funding
• i.e., 1 - 2 billion dollars per year
Appropriate funding level:
• approx. 5-10% of research funding
• i.e., 1 - 2 billion dollars per year
106
Federal Funding of Biomedical-IT
Appropriate funding level:
• approx. 5-10% of research funding
• i.e., 1 - 2 billion dollars per year
Appropriate funding level:
• approx. 5-10% of research funding
• i.e., 1 - 2 billion dollars per year
Source of estimate:
- Experience of IT-transformed industries.
- Current support for IT-rich biological research.
Source of estimate:
- Experience of IT-transformed industries.
- Current support for IT-rich biological research.
Private Sector
Future Reality
Who is this man?
Who is this man?
And why should you care?
TIGR
112
Celera
We want this new company to be the definitive source ofgenomic and related medical information, which scientists canuse to better understand human biology and to deliver improvedhealthcare options.
We want this new company to be the definitive source ofgenomic and related medical information, which scientists canuse to better understand human biology and to deliver improvedhealthcare options.
Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,Teleconference, May 11, 1998Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,Teleconference, May 11, 1998
113
Celera
We want this new company to be the definitive source ofgenomic and related medical information, which scientists canuse to better understand human biology and to deliver improvedhealthcare options. We believe that this company combinescompelling technology with unique sequencing strategies,resulting in a genomics sequencing facility with an expectedcapacity ...
We want this new company to be the definitive source ofgenomic and related medical information, which scientists canuse to better understand human biology and to deliver improvedhealthcare options. We believe that this company combinescompelling technology with unique sequencing strategies,resulting in a genomics sequencing facility with an expectedcapacity ...
Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,Teleconference, May 11, 1998Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,Teleconference, May 11, 1998
114
Celera
We want this new company to be the definitive source ofgenomic and related medical information, which scientists canuse to better understand human biology and to deliver improvedhealthcare options. We believe that this company combinescompelling technology with unique sequencing strategies,resulting in a genomics sequencing facility with an expectedcapacity greater than that of the current combined world output.
We want this new company to be the definitive source ofgenomic and related medical information, which scientists canuse to better understand human biology and to deliver improvedhealthcare options. We believe that this company combinescompelling technology with unique sequencing strategies,resulting in a genomics sequencing facility with an expectedcapacity greater than that of the current combined world output.
Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,Teleconference, May 11, 1998Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,Teleconference, May 11, 1998
115
Celera
We are not a philanthropic organisation, wehave a revenue model for this. We are surepeople will want to buy the information.
We are not a philanthropic organisation, wehave a revenue model for this. We are surepeople will want to buy the information.
Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,quoted in The Guardian, 13 May 1998Tony White, chief executive officer of Perkin-Elmer,quoted in The Guardian, 13 May 1998
117
Millenium Pharmaceuticals
Millenium’s bugs
Mark Levin is an engineer. That makes him ideally qualifiedto be a successful biotechnology entrepreneur
Millenium’s bugs
Mark Levin is an engineer. That makes him ideally qualifiedto be a successful biotechnology entrepreneur
TheEconomist
TheEconomist
SEPTEMBER 26TH - OCTOBER 2ND 1998
118
Millenium PharmaceuticalsMany other biotech firms, increasingly desperate for cash asinvestors have shied away from their shares, have queued up todo deals with the pharmaceutical industry at almost any price. MrLevin, though, has been able to dictate his own terms. Uniquelyamong biotechnologists, he seems to have mastered the art ofhaving his cake and eating it.
Except that Mr Levin is not really a biotechnologist at all:he is a chemical engineer. He has worked in process control forcompanies as varied as Miller Brewing and Genentech, a firm ofbiotech pioneers. Whereas biologists tend to see biotech as thesearch for a compound, Mr Levin thinks of it as a complexproduction process. While they concentrate on the bio, he alsothinks hard about the technology.
Many other biotech firms, increasingly desperate for cash asinvestors have shied away from their shares, have queued up todo deals with the pharmaceutical industry at almost any price. MrLevin, though, has been able to dictate his own terms. Uniquelyamong biotechnologists, he seems to have mastered the art ofhaving his cake and eating it.
Except that Mr Levin is not really a biotechnologist at all:he is a chemical engineer. He has worked in process control forcompanies as varied as Miller Brewing and Genentech, a firm ofbiotech pioneers. Whereas biologists tend to see biotech as thesearch for a compound, Mr Levin thinks of it as a complexproduction process. While they concentrate on the bio, he alsothinks hard about the technology.
TheEconomist
TheEconomist
SEPTEMBER 26TH - OCTOBER 2ND 1998
119
Millenium PharmaceuticalsMr Levin focuses on trying to make each link in the discoverychain as efficient as possible. He has assembled an impressivearray of technologies -- including robotics and informationsystems as well as molecular biology. He then enhances themand links them together in novel ways to create what the engineerin him likes to call "technology platforms". The idea is that theseplatforms should help drug searchers to travel rapidly on theirlong and tortuous journey from gene to treatment. Mr Levin'sgoal is to boost the productivity of drug discovery by 50%,which would lead to many more new drugs coming on to themarket each year.
Mr Levin focuses on trying to make each link in the discoverychain as efficient as possible. He has assembled an impressivearray of technologies -- including robotics and informationsystems as well as molecular biology. He then enhances themand links them together in novel ways to create what the engineerin him likes to call "technology platforms". The idea is that theseplatforms should help drug searchers to travel rapidly on theirlong and tortuous journey from gene to treatment. Mr Levin'sgoal is to boost the productivity of drug discovery by 50%,which would lead to many more new drugs coming on to themarket each year.
TheEconomist
TheEconomist
SEPTEMBER 26TH - OCTOBER 2ND 1998
120
Slides:
http://www.esp.org/rjr/atcc.pdfhttp://www.esp.org/rjr/atcc.pdf