economic impact and strategic analysis adopted by indian ... · pdf fileto identify and...
TRANSCRIPT
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 66
Economic Impact and Strategic Analysis adopted by Indian Leading
Automobile Companies
Dr. Mafruza Sultana, Prof. Rupesh Kumar Sinha
Research & Teaching Associate, Assistant Professor and HOD Operations & IT
IFIM Business School, Bangalore
Abstract
The automotive industry of India is almost seven decades old and its contribution to growth of
Indian Economy is significant.This paper highlighted the strategies adopted by three automotive
giants, Maruti, Tata and Mahindra &Mahindra (M&M). Maruti has maximum market share in
Cars; Tata has in Trucks and M&M in Agricultural Tractors. Automotive industries have seen
massive transformation post trade liberalization during 1990 and it attracted huge investment by
global assemblers.This paper also explored how automotive industry has impacted Indian
economy and Performance of FDI in thissector.
Keywords: Automotive Industry, Indian economy, Strategy, FDI, GDP.
Introduction
Automotive industry has universally emerged as an important driver in the economy. Although
the automotive industry in India is nearly seven decades old, until 1982, only three
manufacturers - M/s. Hindustan Motors, M/s. Premier Automobiles and M/s. Standard Motors
tenanted the motor car sector. Owing to low volumes, it perpetuated obsolete technologies and
was out of sync with the world industry. In 1982, Maruti Udyog Ltd. (MUL) came up as a
government initiative in collaboration with Suzuki of Japan to establish volume production of
contemporary models. After the lifting of licensing in 1993, 17 new ventures have come up of
which 16 are for manufacture of cars. Automobile sector plays a vital role for economy of any
country and Supply Chain Management (SCM) plays an important role in cost cutting.
The Indian automobile sector consists of all vehicles, including 2 wheelers and 3 wheelers,
passenger car and Multi Utility Vehicles (MUVs), Light and Heavy Commercial Vehicles
(LCVs, HCVs), and the allied engineering sector comprises largely of the auto components
sectors. Agricultural tractors and earth moving machinery and its associated sector also part of
Indian automotive sector, which is playing a crucial role in agricultural economy. The following
figure is representing Automotive Sector.
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 67
Figure1: Automotive Industry Structure
Automotive Industry
Automobile
Two Wheelers
Three Wheelers
Passanger Cars
commercial vehicles
Multi Utility Vehicles
Allied Sector
Auto Components
Agricultural Tractors & Earth Moving machienery
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 68
This paper focused on study of Indian automobile companies: Maruti, Tata Motors and Mahindra
and Mahindra.For automobile sector supply chain practices is very important because it helps the
business to go towards success by optimizing the resources. This study aims to find the best
strategic supply chain practices which helped these automobile firms to gain its growth and its
current position. This paper also focused on the contribution of Indian Automobile sectors in
Indian Economy.Bowersox and Closs (1996) stated that, to be properly effective in the
contemporary competitive environment, firm must expand and extend their integrated behaviour
to include customer and suppliers.Scannell (2000) found that externally purchased materials
account for 60% to 70% of the manufacturing costs of a new car made by the Big Three U.S.
automakers. They are increasingly outsourcing non-core activities and relying on upstream first-
tier suppliers to deliver competitive advantages. He tried to find out, up to what extent variety of
SCM practices have been implemented, such as developing suppliers, building closer buyer-
supplier relationships, and just-in-time (JIT) purchasing processes. The first primary research
question that the article explores is to what extent are these suppliers practicing supplier
development, supplier partnering, and JIT purchasing with their upstream sources. Second
question is-how do these key SCM practices, both individually and collectively, relate to
improved competitive performance. He also tries to examine performance in terms of flexibility,
innovation, quality, and cost; focuses on several specific items within each of these categories
and also analyze each category as a whole.Functional integration of logistics processes or
channels is also emphasized by different researchers. Lummus et al. (2001), Cavinato (1982)
defined logistics as the management of all inbound and outbound materials, parts, suppliers, and
finished goods. Cavinato‟s highlights relation of logistics with the integrated management of
purchasing, transportation, and storage on a functional basis.John (2001) studied relationship
between the significance of optimizing logistics in the automobile industry. General Motors
Corp. has partnership with UPS for outbound logistics and Ford Motors Corp. formed a joint
venture with CNF Inc.
The numbers of models increased significantly from 550 in 1980 to 1,050 in 1999 (Veloso
2002). Sanchez (2005) explored the relationship between the dimensions of supply chain
flexibility and firm performance in a sample of automotive suppliers. He talked about different
aspects of flexibility such as functional aspects (flexibility in operations, marketing, logistics),
measurement aspects (focused on global flexibility measures vs context specific ones),
hierarchical aspects (flexibility at shop, plant or company level), strategic aspects (centered on
the strategic relevance of flexibility), time horizon aspects (long-term vs short-term flexibility)
and object of change (flexibility of product, mix, volume).Sharma et al (2008) stated that in order
to make mark globally by Indian automobile industry it is needed to improve supply chain
efficiency and it should be given high priority.
Govindam et al (2010) developed a framework to analyze the interactions among the criteria
such as competitive pressure, evaluation and certification system, incentives, supplier
development programs, inter-organizational communication, buyer-supplier relationship,
supplier commitment, supplier performance, asset specificity, joint action, trust, long-term
strategic goals, top management support, purchasing performance, and supplier strategic
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 69
objective for the supplier development using Interpretative Structural Modeling
(ISM).Bhattacharjee, Anuradha (2014) pointed out that “Dramatic changes have taken place in
India since 1991 when economic liberalization became the mantra of the government of India.
The new economic reforms popularly known as liberalization, privatization and globalization
were aimed at making the Indian economy a globally competitive economy. Despite some
fluctuations, foreign trade and investment is growing at a steady pace. These developments as
also the influx of multinational companies over the years have opened the floodgates of private
sector advertising in India”.(Sinha, 2015) highlighted that the competition is fierce and
organizations are slogging to get profit. SCM plays important role by reducing the cost and thus
by increasing margin, if it is managed properly. An easy way to get more profit is by reducing
costs through outsourcing (Simchi –Levi et al 2008).Sharmelly, Rifat and Ray, Pradeep Kanta
(2015) mentioned that “there has been a dramatic shift of world economic power towards less-
developed countries, in particular, emerging economies (EEs). The growing influence of EEs is
shifting the global competitive landscape, as these new economies are a great source of
opportunity, inspiration and innovation. However, companies face the challenge to identify what
organizational capabilities are required to serve mass market customers to meet their unique
demand and price-performance conditions”.
Our objective in this research is to measure for this industry the effect of several factors on
inventory holdings. We find that two factors, the number of dealerships in a manufacturer's
distribution network and a manufacturer's production flexibility, explain essentially all of the
difference in finished-goods inventory between Toyota and three other manufacturers: Chrysler,
Ford, and General Motors.The purpose of this study is to investigate the relevance of the concept
of supply chain practices in the Indian automobile sector with special reference to Maruti, Tata
Motors and Mahindra and Mahindra. This paper tries to identify best practices of supply chain
and itsespousaland execution. It also highlights the impact of Indian Automobile sector on Indian
Economy.
Research Objectives:
1. To identify and explore the best strategies and operations practices followed by
theseIndian Automobile sector, like Maruti, Mahindra & Mahindra and Tata
Motors.
2. How Indian Economy benefited from these sectors.
3. To identify the market share and sector wise performance of these firms.
4. Performance of FDI in Indian Automobile sectors.
Research Methodology:
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 70
To meet the objectives, secondary data has been collected from official Website of Govt. of India
and respective automobile manufacturer. Also, information was captured from related articles
published in Magazines, Journals, related books and official reports. To view the trend of market
share and FDI trends at a glance, trend lines and diagrams have been used.
Research Background:
SCM is the integration of key business processes from end user through original suppliers that
provides products, services, and information that add value for customers and other stakeholders
(Lambert, Cooper, 1998).Supply Chain Management (SCM) is an integrated approach to resolve
issues in sourcing, customer service, demand flow and distribution. Increased competition and
globalization of markets has led both Indian organizations and multinational firms in India to
strive to differentiate themselves from their competitors. SCM practices are considered necessary
because it offers a „proven‟ means by which firms can dramatically cut costs and improve
performance. Monczka and Morgan (1997) stated that organizations have realized that a firm
does not compete with another firm as stand alone, but a firm‟s supply chain competes with
competitors‟ supply chains. Enhancing effectiveness and efficiency of the supply chain has
therefore become a crucial activity.
Neely (1999) explained that there are seven main reasons for performance measurement. These
are follows-
1. The changing nature of work
2. Increasing competition
3. Specific improvement initiatives
4. National and International quality awards
5. Changing organizational roles
6. Changing external demands; and
7. The power of information technology.
In the context of Indian industry most of the factors mentioned are visible and experienced.As
par Saad and Patel (2002), there is still lack of significant study of supply chain performance in
developing nations in general and in India in particular.
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 71
Background of Auto Mobile Sector:
India‟s automotive industry is one of the most competitive in the world. It does not cover 100 per
cent of technology or components required to make a car but it is giving a good 97 per cent, as
highlighted by MrVicentCobee, Corporate Vice-President, Nissan Motor‟s Datsun.Leading auto
maker Maruti Suzuki expects Indian passenger car market to reach four million units by 2020, up
from 1.97 million units in 2014-15.The Indian automotive sector has the potential to generate up
to USD 300 billion in annual revenue by 2026, create 65 million additional jobs and contribute
over 12 per cent to India‟s Gross Domestic Product.
There are a number of top automobile companies running their operations in India, which again
have a range of models in different segments of cars. However, while looking for top 10
automobile companies in India; one name that would always lead the list is Maruti Suzuki India.
Maruti Suzuki has consistently been the dominant leader in the Indian automobile industry.
However, there are also other big names like Tata Motors, Mahindra and Mahindra, Hyundai
Motors, Hindustan Motors etc.During its early days, the most of the Indian car auto
manufacturers banked upon foreign technologies. But the scenario has changed over the years
and currently, the Indian auto manufacturers are using their own technology.After the recent
setback due to the global recession, the Indian automobile market has again started to grow up.
Strategy and best practices of SCM:
Maruti Suzuki India Limited (MSIL): Maruti Suzuki India Ltd was incorporated on February
24, 1981 with the name Maruti Udyog Ltd. The company was formed as a government company,
and Suzuki was a minor partner. The intension was to make a people's car for middle class India.
According to IBEF domestic sales of passenger vehicles will grow from 2.6 million in 2015 to
9.4 to 13.4 million in 2016 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 12.39% during 2015-19. In
India the customer would like to go for new models and they also have large numbers of
products are available across various segments. This has also reduced lifecycle of the cars and
forcing automobile manufacturer to invest in R&D.
Over the years, the company's product range has widened and right now Maruti is offering 15
models with 150 variants. The company became the first Indian automobile company to
manufacture one million vehicles in 1994. At present, the company is sitting on a capacity to
make almost 1.5 million cars a year and it is in the process of adding capacity for another
250,000 cars. Suzuki-Maruti led to early success. The once dominant Hindustan Motors, whose
Ambassador model (essentially the 1960s vintage Morris Oxford) had been India‟s biggest
selling car for decades, lost market share at a dramatic rate to the new Suzuki-Maruti model,
which went on to capture 70% of passenger car sales by the early 1990s (Sutton, 2004). At
present Maruti Suzuki enjoys a market share of 46.8% in Indian passenger vehicle market.
Maruti continued to enhance value chain in the Supply Chain. It also persistently partnership
with their supplier and did value analysis and value enhancement (VA/VE) of the projects.
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 72
Maruti got yield improvements also by joint efforts with their supplier. It also worked on
localization of parts imported by vendors to tone down risk arising out of foreign exchange
exposure and to reduce the input cost.
The Maruti continues to launch new models. It created Nexa to cater the requirement of customer
of premium segment through it. Baleno and S-Cross are launched through Nexa. Maruti is going
to launch its 3rd
car in this segment through Nexa is ignis by 2017. They are targeting urban
youth for this hatchback car.
Grant et al (2013) noticed that over years, Maruti has been redefining supply chain strategies and
operations and designing their operations to maximize throughput and lower cost. To improve
profitability and efficiency, Maruti has been innovating to achieve operational excellence, reduce
operating cost and enhance customer service through efficient supply chain and logistics
management. Maruti understand that sustainable logistic operations positively affect the supply
chain.
Tata Motors:Tata Motors Limited was established in 1942, a USD 42 billion organization. It‟s a
leading global automobile manufacturer. It manufacturers cars, sports vehicles, buses, trucks and
defence vehicles. It has total 60,000 employees. It is the world's fourth largest truck
manufacturer, and theworld's second largest bus manufacturer. Tata motors leads the market
share in commercial vehicles with 55% market in MCVs and LCVs sector and 54% market in
LCVs. In Passenger car segment, it has market share of 10% only.
Tata motors have used their Supply chain effectively. Cost of the Nano car for Rs. 1 Lackhs is
the result of their good Supply Chain. A unique aspect of Tata Motors supply chain that
differentiates them from many of their competitors is how early they work with their suppliers in
determining cost estimates. With the Nano, they worked very early with their suppliers in
arriving at the cost estimate of the car. In an unusual move for an automotive company, they
determined the complete functional requirements of the Nano‟s parts before ever giving a hint to
the public about the development of the vehicle. Tata motors followed integrated planning with
their suppliers to reduce the cost of Supply Chain. For this they have used state of the art
software programs to manage cost of Supply chain. They used Ariba Spend Management
Software which was reported by a Business Wire article (2005).The input cost and competitive
marketplace are rising. It is crucial to managing spend and improving efficiency. Spend
management worked as a strategic resource for Tata motors to drive more efficient cost controls
and to deliver positive bottom-line results.Tata Motors is following lean and Just in Time and it
is helping them to reduce fixed expenses and extra inventory cost. They manufacture strictly
according to customer order i.e. according to pull system.
Tata Motors is doing in depth assessment of vendor. They take care of different issues like
safety, child labour, forced labour and human rights aspects before selecting a partner. They have
got very effective communication with their vendor and it make them successful. Some
examples of this high level communication are monthly vendor meetings discussing Tata
Motors‟ growth plan, Tata Motors also has a Vendor Council which meets quarterly, and they
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 73
have built vendor parks with all of their new plants which improves supplier relations and solves
logistics issues.Tata motors have selected strategic location for manufacturing. They are in
Tatanagar, Pune, Lucknow, Sanand and Dharwad. They are India‟s only fully integrated
auotomotive manufacturer.
Mahindra & Mahindra Limited (M&M):Mahindra &Mahindra Limited is another auto-giant
in India. Mahindra& Mahindra is a part of the USD 17.8 billion global Mahindra Group
headquartered in Mumbai, India, with a presence in over 100 countries and employing over
2,00,000 people. The Group‟s operations span 20 key industries across 10 sectors. Mahindra &
Mahindra has leading market position in various automotive segments. It is largest tractor
manufacturer as well as largest utility vehicle manufacturer. It‟svehicles are known for their
tough, rugged and reliable DNA and cater to a wide spectrum of customer needs, from enhancing
lifestyle to generating livelihood. Mahindra & Mahindra launched their first utility vehicle,
“Jeep”, in 1947 in India. Mahindra & Mahindra is also focusing itself to produce green vehicle
such as e2O in collaborations with Rewa. In long runs these vehicles are going to get highest
demand.
Mahindra & Mahindra had Green Supply Chain Management Policy and it has been shared with
all suppliers, under which the company is committed to improve awareness with regards to legal
compliances, enhance eco-efficiencies, employee health and safety initiatives etc.
Impact on Indian Economy:
Table 1: Automobile Production Trends
Category 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Passenger
Vehicles 2982772 3146069 3231058 3087973 3221419 3413859
Commercial
Vehicles 760735 929136 832649 699035 698298 782814
Three
Wheelers 799553 879289 839748 830108 949019 933950
Two
Wheelers 13349349 15427532 15744156 16883049 18489311 18829786
Grand Total 17892409 20382026 20647611 21500165 23358047 23960409 Source : SIAM India
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 74
Figure: 2
Figure: 3
2700000
2800000
2900000
3000000
3100000
3200000
3300000
3400000
3500000
Passenger Vehicles
Passenger Vehicles
Linear (Passenger Vehicles)
Year
No of Vehicles sold
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
900000
1000000
Commercial Vehicles
Commercial Vehicles
Linear (Commercial Vehicles)
Year
No of Vehicles sold
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 75
Figure: 3
Figure: 4
From the above Table 1 and Figure 2, 3&4 it can be stated that the industry produced total
23,960,409 vehicles during 2015-16, which increased by 2.58% than the last year. The growth
rate of two wheelers, which has the highest market share of 78.59%,is only 1.84% than the last
year and maintaining a continuous increasing growth trend for the last six years. After two
wheelers the highest market share is of Passenger vehicles which accounts for 14.25% and
700000
750000
800000
850000
900000
950000
1000000
Three Wheelers
Three Wheelers
Linear (Three Wheelers)
Year
No of Vehicles sold
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
25000000
Two Wheelers
Two Wheelers
Linear (Two Wheelers)
Year
No of Vehicles sold
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 76
increased by 5.97% than the last year. This sector is also maintaining an increasing growth trend.
The commercial vehicles which have the lowest market share of 3.27% and faced a decreasing
growth trend till 2014-15, suddenly increased by 12.1% for the year 2015-16. In case of three
wheelers which has also a low market share of 3.9%, showed a mixed growth trend. Though
2014-15 is the peak year for the three wheelers but the other vehicles have faced a bad situation
in this period.
Table 2: Market share of all vehicles for FY 2015-16
Category
%age of Market
Share
Passenger Vehicles 14.25%
Commercial Vehicles 3.27%
Three Wheelers 3.90%
Two Wheelers 78.59%
Grand Total 100.00% Source: Author Compilation based on SIAM India data
Figure: 5
The above diagram showed that the two wheelers segment has the highest market share of
78.59% and is the leader of the Indian Automobile sector. Moreover, the growing interest of the
companies in exploring the rural markets further aided the growth of the sector.In addition,
14.25% 3.27%
3.90%
78.59%
Percentage of Market Share for FY 2015-16
Passenger Vehicles
Commercial Vehicles
Three Wheelers
Two Wheelers
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 77
several initiatives by the Government of India and the major automobile players in the Indian
market are expected to make India a leader in the Two Wheeler (2W) and Four Wheeler (4W)
market in the world by 2020.
Table 3: Sales turnover and profit
Sl. No. Company Sales
turnover in
Crores in
Mar'2016
Net Profit in
Crores in
Mar'2016
% of
Profit
1 Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. 65,262.80 16,434.80 25.2
2 Tata Motors Ltd. 46,646.67 4085.25 8.8
3 Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. 43,606.64 5493.8 12.6
Figure: 6
After observing Table: 3 and Figure: 6 it can be said that Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. has the
highest sales turnover of 65,262.80 crores and earned the highest profit that accounts of 25.2% in
Mar‟2016, which provides Maruti the leading position in the automobile sector.
The Indian automobile industry is one of the largest industries in the world and these contribute
7.1% to the country‟s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For this reason,it can be said that Indian
0.00
10,000.00
20,000.00
30,000.00
40,000.00
50,000.00
60,000.00
70,000.00
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.Tata Motors Ltd.Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
Sales turnover in Crores in Mar'2016
Net Profit in Crores in Mar'2016
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 78
automobile industry isan engine of growth for the Indian economy. The auto component industry
contributes 25.6% to the manufacturing GDP and providing direct employment to 1.5 million
people.
Table 4: FDI inflows in the automotives sector.
FY
FDI (in USD
billion)
FY 2010 4.6
FY 2011 5.9
FY 2012 6.7
FY 2013 8.3
FY 2014 9.8
FY 2015 12.4
FY 2016* 13.5 Source: Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (India), TechSci
Research
Note: * indicates FY16 up-to June 2015
Figure: 7
FDI inflows in the automotives sector aggregated USD 13.5 billion (5 % of the total FDI) over
April 2000-June 2015. In order to keep up with the growing demand, several auto makers have
4.6
5.96.7
8.3
9.8
12.4
13.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015FY 2016*
FDI (in USD billion)
FDI (in USD billion)
Linear (FDI (in USD billion))
Year
FDI trends over the past few years (USD billion)
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 79
started investing heavily in various segments of the industry during the last few months. The
industry has attracted Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) worth USD 15.06 billion during the
period April 2000 to March 2016, according to data released by Department of Industrial Policy
and Promotion (DIPP).
Conclusion:
Maruti, Tata Motors and Mahindra & Mahindra have excellent supply chain practices. They all
have strategic location for manufacturing and evolved method of selection of supplier. They all
prefer local suppliers. Their prime focus is on innovation and they are investing huge sum of
money in R&D.Focus strategy towards their specialized products have made them market
leaders in each market segment. Maruti is market leaders for Cars, Tata Motors in Trucks &
Utility vehicles Mahindra & Mahindra in agricultural Tractors.
Indian automobile sector contributes 7.1% to GDP where as auto component industries
contribute to 25.6% to manufacturing GDP. It provides direct employment to 1.5 million people.
Effective Supply chain management will leads to more cost reduction in this segment and thus
will leads to more profitability and more contribution towards GDP can compete strongly in
global market and will leads to economic development of the country.
References:
1. Bhattacharjee, A. (2014). “Advertising Strategies in Emerging Economics: The case of
the Indian Automobile”. IPE Journal of Management. Vol. 4. Issue 1. P96-114. ISSN:
2249-9040.
2. Bowersox, D. J. and Closs, D. J. (1996).“Logistical Management: The Integrated Supply
Chain Process”. International Editions. McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
3. Cavinato, J.L. (Eds.) (1982).“The Traffic Service Corporation”. The Traffic Service
Corporation, Washington, DC.
4. D.B. Grant, A. Trautrim and C.Y. Wong, “Sustainable Logistics and Supply Chain
Management:Principles and Practices for Sustainable Operations and
Management”.Kogan Page: UK, 2013.
5. D.M. Lambert, M.C. Cooper et al., “Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues
and Research Opportunities” The International Journal of Logistics Management. vol. 9.
no. 2. pp. 1-19, 1998.
6. Govindan, K., Kannan, D., &Haq, A. N. (2010). “Analyzing supplier development
criteria for an automobile industry”. Industrial Management & Data Systems.110(1). 43-
62. doi:10.1108/02635571011008399
7. http://www.ibef.org/industry/india-automobiles.aspx accessed on 28th oct 2016
8. http://www.siamindia.com/statistics.aspx?mpgid=8&pgidtrail=13 accessed on 2nd
Nov
2016
9. http://www.siamindia.com/cpage.aspx?mpgid=16&pgid1=17&pgidtrail=76
International Journal Of Advancement In Engineering Technology, Management and
Applied Science (IJAETMAS)
ISSN: 2349-3224 || www.ijaetmas.com || Volume 04 - Issue 04 || April-2017 || PP. 66-80
www.ijaetmas.com Page 80
10. Lummus, R. R., Krumwiede, D. W. and Vokurka, R. J. (2001).“The relationship of
logistics to supply chain management: Developing a common industry definition”.
Industrial Management & Data Systems. Vol. 101. No. 8. pp. 426-431.
11. MartínezSánchez, A. and PérezPérez, M. (2005). “Supply chain flexibility and firm
performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 25 (7). pp.
681–700.
12. Scannell, T. V., Vickery, S. K., &Dröge, C. L. (2000). “UPSTREAM SUPPLY CHAIN
MANAGEMENT AND COMPETITIVE PERFORMANCE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE
SUPPLY INDUSTRY”. Journal of Business Logistics.21(1). 23-48.
13. Sharma, V., Sahay, B. S., &Sardana, G. D. (2008). “An Empirical Assessment of the
Impact of SCM Practices on Quality Performance: A Case in the Indian Automobile
Industry”. Supply Chain Forum: International Journal.9(1). 28-40.
14. Sharmelly, R., Ray, P. (2015). “Organizational Capabilities for Mass Market Innovations
in the Emerging Economics: Insights from an Automobile Firm in India”. Journal of
Comparative International Management. Vol. 18. Issue 1. P56-78. ISSN: 1481-0468.
15. Sinha, R. K. (2015). "SCM: A case study of foodworld, bangalore". International Journal
of Logistics & Supply Chain Management Perspectives , 1526-1530.
16. Shea, J. (2001). Optimizing Logistics. Automotive Industries, 181(12), 24.
17. Supply chain flexibility and firm performance : A conceptual model and empirical study
in the automotive industry
18. Ulrich, K. T., and Eppinger, S. D. (2000).“Product design and development”. 2nd Ed.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill. Boston
19. Veloso, F. P.(2002). “Automotive supply chain: Global trends and Asian
perspectives.”ERD Working Paper No. 3. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines.