ebhc 2019, 6-9th november, taormina, sicily. critical thinking for … · 2019. 11. 13. · ebhc...

20
EBHC 2019, 6-9 th November, Taormina, Sicily. Critical thinking for transformation: An extension to the 5-steps of evidence-based practice incorporating ways of thinking and practising Dr Rachel Thompson PhD, School of Education, UNSW Arts & Social Sciences Learning & Teaching Fellow, Senior Lecturer, Office of Medical Education, UNSW Medicine Convenor, Quality of Medical Practice, UNSW Medical Program [email protected]

Upload: others

Post on 01-Feb-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • EBHC 2019, 6-9th November, Taormina, Sicily.

    Critical thinking for transformation:An extension to the 5-steps of evidence-based practice

    incorporating ways of thinking and practising

    Dr Rachel Thompson

    PhD, School of Education, UNSW Arts & Social Sciences

    Learning & Teaching Fellow, Senior Lecturer, Office of Medical

    Education, UNSW Medicine

    Convenor, Quality of Medical Practice, UNSW Medical Program

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Background

    [email protected]

    Critical thinking

    Critical thinking

    Critical thinking

    Critical thinking

    Critical thinking

    Getting stuck!

    Getting stuck!

    Getting stuck!

    Getting stuck!

    Getting stuck!

    Stats & numbers

    Information literacy

    Clinical Skills

    Reflective practice

    Understanding bias & research

    Clinical Skills

    Figure 1. Evidence-based Practice Cycle

    Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P., Cartabellotta, A., Martin, J., Hopayian, K., … Osborne, J. (2005). Sicily statement

    on evidence-based practice. BMC Medical Education, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-1

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Aims – Threshold Concepts

    Figure 2. Representation of individual student liminal threshold concept learning journeys (Meyer & Land, 2003, 2004)

    (Figure based on Kabo and Baillie 2010, p. 307)

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Critical thinking for transformation

    1

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Methods

    Constructivist, interpretivist paradigm

    Qualitative Research

    • Recruitment, consent and interviewing of experts and students

    • Regular submission of reflective journals by 8 case study participants

    • Interviews and audio journals transcribed >>> qualitative textual data

    Data analysis

    • NVIVO: transcribed interviews and reflective journal entries

    • Abductive thematic analysis

    Theoretical framework

    • Threshold Concept Framework + Vygotskian theory

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Figure 3. Diagram depicting an abductive analysis process

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Fig 4. Conceptual learning according to Vygotsky

    Theoretical Framework: Vygotsky

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    “…inner speech is speech for oneself;

    external speech is for others.”

    Vygotsky 2012, p. 239

    ZAD: zone of actual development

    ZPD: zone of proximal development

    ZFD: zone of far development

    Fig 5. Image portraying zones of development (after Zaretskii, 2009)

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Limitations

    • Sole-researcher

    • Qualitative study of few participants at one university medical school

    • Abductive research methodology is novel

    Process undertaken was rigorous

    Results considered valid and transferable

    “A significant contribution to knowledge in the area of threshold concepts both in terms

    of our conceptual and methodological understanding of liminality.”

    This research offers fresh avenues of research for EBP teachers, a new theoretical

    framework for qualitative research of threshold concepts, and an extension of the

    knowledge and ways of teaching EBP for healthcare professionals.

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Results: The Conceptual Elements of EBP,

    Medical Biostats & Research

    A complex interlinked web of conceptual

    disciplinary elements:

    • Simple ideas, simple concepts,

    fundamental ideas, simple and complex

    threshold concepts.

    • Over-arching elements necessary for

    expert identity, e.g. ways of thinking and

    practising.

    • Threshold capability, skill, and modelling

    concepts.

    • Statistical significance is a

    classic example of a threshold

    concept.

    • Understanding Bias & Study

    Design is a major, complex,

    integrated threshold concept.

    • EBP as a clinical practice is

    an over-arching threshold.

  • Results: Complex inner speech

    as a questioning, interrogating tool

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Yeah. I definitely think

    that a voice is always

    there or there’s always

    questions. … – but you

    need to be able to

    realise it.

    Suppose I tell you about

    a new concept, the first

    thing you’re going to

    think about is: ‘What is

    this?’ And that’s your

    inner voice – that’s a

    question: ‘Well, what is

    this?’

    When I’m talking to myself

    it's very similar to … if I'm

    talking to someone in order

    to explain that new concept,

    - - - because when I'm

    talking to myself, I'm

    thinking of myself as

    another person…

    Yeah, it's automatic.

    Somehow, I need to talk

    it out. I need to talk out

    loud, because I think no

    one else - not many

    people around me do

    that. It's a bit of both,

    yeah, dialogue and

    argument.

    CS2, Interview 2

    CS6, Interview 2 CS1, Interview 2

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Results: Inner voices for conceptual learning

    The Devil’s Advocate…there is this part of me who is this devil's

    advocate, challenges [my] understanding

    [of] things.

    The Questioner‘How [do] you respond?’ ‘How would this

    principle apply to that?’

    The Clarifier…you are picking on your particular faults,

    the particular gaps in your knowledge…

    The Teacher…often it’s your own voice that’s kind of

    explaining to yourself.

    Figure 6. Depiction of the main processes of dialogue for learning

  • Critical thinking to initiate transformative learning

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Figure 7. The pre-liminal critical thinking steps to initiate transformative learning

    … and then by talking to myself

    I'm trying to bring it all together, so

    it's one whole new concept.

    (CS1, Interview 2)

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Figure 8. The three liminal critical thinking steps for transformation

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Critical thinking for transformation

    So, … when you put it all together it

    all makes sense. I guess that’s when

    that ‘eureka’ - you see the whole

    instead of just the parts.

    (Case 2, Interview 2)

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Figure 9. Summary model of transformational conceptual learning

    Figure 10.

    Main influences on

    transformational shifts

    from novice to expert

    identity

  • Evidence-based Practice Cycle

    Figure 11. EBP ways of thinking & practising (WTP)Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    The Bottom Line

    Inner struggle is necessary for transformation.

    Focus on the student as Learner-Teacher and

    encourage argumentative self-instruction:

    1. Mapping/scaffolding of troublesome concepts

    to assist individual student’s liminal journey

    using narratives, analogies, mapping the

    learning journey and key concepts.

    2. Develop supportive learning activities to

    challenge & encourage students to use their

    inner self-teaching for troublesome concepts.

    3. Transformation to expert practitioner is also

    difficult & transformational >>> focus support

    on clinical tutor/peer support within the clinical

    environment.

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Q&A

    Acknowledgements & Thanks to:

    • The research participants

    • My PhD supervisors: Dr Tony Loughland (School of Education), Dr Michael Michell

    (School of Education), A/Prof Noel Whitaker (Faculty of Science)

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • BibliographyAlderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C. (2015). Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin,

    141(5), 931–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021

    Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK, Bristol, USA: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open

    University Press.

    Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., Glasziou, P., Cartabellotta, A., Martin, J., Hopayian, K., … Osborne, J. (2005). Sicily statement on evidence-based practice.

    BMC Medical Education, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-5-1

    Fernyhough, C. (2016). The voices within: The history and science of how we talk to ourselves (1st ed.). London: Wellcome Collection.

    Hurlburt, R. T., Heavey, C. L., & Kelsey, J. M. (2013). Toward a phenomenology of inner speaking. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 1477–1494.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.003

    Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feuerstein’s perspectives in a study of

    student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3002_3

    Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines.

    Occasional Report 4. Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses Project, Universities of Edinburgh, Coventry and

    Durham, 2003 (Vol. 4). Edinburgh. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9837-1

    Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for

    teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779-5

    Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research (1st ed.). Chicago & London: University of Chicago.

    Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3),

    167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

    Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. (A. Kozulin, Ed.) (Revised). Cambridge, MA; London, England: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Zaretskii, V. K. (2009). The Zone of Proximal Development. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47(6), 70–93.

    https://doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-0405470604

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Repeated Figure 2. Diagram depicting an abductive analysis processDr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Abductive analysis process:

    “…abduction starts with consequences and then constructs reasons:

    “The surprising fact C is observed. But if A were true, C would be a

    matter of course.

    Hence, there is a reason to suspect that A is true. (Peirce 1934:117)”

    Timmermans & Tavory, 2012, p.171

    Uses the researchers cultivated knowledge in the analysis rather than

    denying it.

    “Abduction thus depends on the researcher’s cultivated position.”

    “Unanticipated and surprising observations are strategic in the sense

    that they depend on a theoretically sensitized observer who

    recognizes their potential relevance.”

    T&T, 2012, p. 173

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Vygotsky on language and thinking(Vygotsky, 2012)

    “…inner speech is speech for oneself; external speech is for others.” Vygotsky (2012, p.

    239).

    • Classified as a monologue compared to external speech which is mostly social

    dialogue.

    • Inner speech is for self - for ”intellectual perception” for mastery of non-spontaneous

    concepts and to enable conscious learning processes.

    • Words and language are “psychological tools” of the mind to mediate basic thought

    processes for more complex processes.

    • Critical thinking and conceptual learning are inherently linked.

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    Additional Figure 1: Conceptual learning according to Vygotsky

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Additional Figure 2. Zones of Development (Vygotsky, 2012)(Figure based on Zaretskii 2009, p. 82)

    Dr Rachel Thompson [email protected]

    ZAD: zone of actual

    development;

    ZPD: zone of proximal

    development;

    ZFD: zone of far

    development

    mailto:[email protected]

  • Additional Figure 3. Visual representation of learner progression through conceptual

    thresholds as zones of development (After Zaretskii, 2009, p. 82)

    ZAD: zone of actual development; ZPD: zone of proximal development; ZFD: zone of far development