earth - image link
TRANSCRIPT
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Adrian MilesInterMedia UiB (Norway)
RMIT (Australia)
[email protected]://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/vlog/200
2
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive.
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive. • it appropriates web browsers or clients as
a de facto tv
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive. • it appropriates web browsers or clients as
a de facto tv
• looks backwards for a networked model
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive. • it appropriates web or clients as de facto tv
• looks backwards for a networked model
• treats the network as broad or narrowcast where the model is middlecasting
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Most models of ‘interactive’ internet (networked) delivered video is not interactive. • it appropriates web or clients as de facto tv
• looks backwards for a networked model
• treats the network as broad or narrowcast where the model is middlecasting
• interactivity must be within the video stream
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video • recognises users constraints of
time, bandwidth, screen
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video • recognises users constraints of
time, bandwidth, screen
• we are time poor - example of tv advertising
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video • recognises users constraints of
time, bandwidth, screen
• we are time poor - example of tv advertising
• we are bandwidth poor - instant broadband willnot erase lack
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Available and appropriate technologies are available for networked interactive desktop video • recognises users constraints of
time, bandwidth, screen
• we are time poor - example of tv advertising
• we are bandwidth poor - instant broadband willnot erase lack
• we are screen poor and window rich - collage + montage
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm
• they assume temporally constrainedand delimited media (tape, film, broadcast)
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm
• they assume temporally constrainedand delimited media (tape, film, broadcast)
• this media has a fixed duration, it occupies time
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Existing digital video tools use a hard copy paradigm
• they assume temporally constrainedand delimited media (tape, film, broadcast)
• this media has a fixed duration, it occupies time
• if the computer screen is the medium of publication(and interaction/consumption) this is no longer the case
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• yes, linking.
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• yes, linking.
• but wait . . .
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• yes, linking.
• but wait . . .
. . . there’s more
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• users own their desktops, including windows,applications and their qualities
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• users own their desktops, including windows,applications and their qualities
• works are open
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• users own their desktops, including windows,applications and their qualities
• works are open
• works are variable
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• users own their desktops, including windows,applications and their qualities
• works are open
• works are variable
• works are performative (not constative)
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• users own their desktops, including windows,applications and their qualities
• works are open
• works are variable
• works are performative (not constative)
• and can be ergodic
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Soft copy video is a different paradigm
• softvideo gives desktop video all the propertiesof hypertext
• users own their desktops, including windows,applications and their qualities
• works are open
• works are variable
• works are performative (not constative)
• and can be ergodic
• are about vectors, events, relations
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts
• montage moves to a site between the author and thework
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts
• montage moves to a site between the author and thework
• montage moves to a site between the work and theuser
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts
• montage moves to a site between the author and thework
• montage moves to a site between the work and theuser
• video has a variable duration (user controlled variable looping)
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts
• montage moves to a site between the author and thework
• montage moves to a site between the work and theuser
• video has a variable duration (user controlled variable looping)
• video has a possible open duration
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
Softvideo poses new problems for cinematic contexts
• montage moves to a site between the author and thework
• montage moves to a site between the work and theuser
• video has a variable duration (user controlled variable looping)
• video has a possible open duration
• we now have relations between video panes
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
So what?
• this technology is distributed
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
So what?
• this technology is distributed
• is writerly
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
So what?
• this technology is distributed
• is writerly
• offers viable models to explore broadbandentertainment, documentary, fiction, and education
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
So what?
• this technology is distributed
• is writerly
• offers viable models to explore broadbandentertainment, documentary, fiction, and education
• is a vernacular which needs a grammaror rhetoric
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
So what?
• this technology is distributed
• is writerly
• offers viable models to explore broadbandentertainment, documentary, fiction, and education
• is a vernacular which needs a grammaror rhetoric
• is a vernacular that provides a grammaror rhetoric
videocriture: interactive video vernaculars
vogshttp://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/vog/
nordic interactive cinema networkhttp://www.intermedia.uib.no/nicn/