early childhood transition part c indicator c-8 & part b indicator b-12 analysis and summary...
TRANSCRIPT
Early Childhood TransitionPart C Indicator C-8
& Part B Indicator B-12
Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ 2008-2009
Annual Performance Reports
Kathy Whaley & Debbie Cate(NECTAC)
December 14, 2010, 4:00 PM EST1
Webinar Focus• National Trend Data for APR
Indicators C-8 & B-12
• Continuing Challenges
• Improvement activities Contributing to Improved Performance
• Implications for Practice
– Policy Makers
– Administrators
– Front Line Staff
2
Part C Transition IndicatorThe analysis of data across Indicators C-8 and B-12 provides a national perspective on early childhood transition from Part C to Part B for the following requirements: C8a - IFSPs with transition steps and servicesC8b - Notification to LEA, if child is potentially eligible
for Part B C8c - Transition conference for potentially eligible
children
3
Part B Indicator
B12 - Children referred by Part C prior to age three, who are found eligible for Part B and have an IEP developed and implemented by age 3
4
• Performance does not necessarily provide measures of the quality of transitions, but the extent to which specific requirements of IDEA are being met.
• These analyses yield data on practices that are necessary but may not sufficient to ensure quality
• States have worked diligently to improve transition!
5
NationalTrendData
7
Transition Indicator Trend Data (C8 & B12)
8
C8a - Change from Baseline to FFY 08-09 Actual Performance
9
C8b - Change from Baseline to FFY 08-09 Actual Performance
10
C8c - Change from Baseline to FFY 08-09 Actual Performance
11
B12 – Change from Baseline to FFY 08-09 Actual Performance
12
Indicator B12 - Early Childhood Transition by Child Count
69
93 98 95 9590
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
< 11K 11K to 32K >32K to 62K >62K to 90K >90K to 180K >180 to 566K
Trends in Capacity to Collect and Use Data
• Increasing use of state data systems by Part C & Part B
• Part C continuing to use monitoring mechanisms for reporting C8a
• Variation in process, practices and category descriptions
• Few states using unique child identifiers
• Improved ability to match specific child data from C to B
• Improvements in migrating sets of data from C to B
13
Challenges to Meeting Timelines
and Requirements of Early Childhood
Transition
Challenges Influencing Practices
• Maintaining adequate numbers of qualified personnel
• Scheduling and completing evaluations
• Increasing numbers of children referred & transitioned
• Conducting transition conferences & IEP meetings for children with summer birthdays
15
Challenges Influencing Practices
• Late referrals to both 619 and Part C programs
• Addressing family circumstances & parent refusals
• Sharing child specific data across programs
• Maintaining local expertise due to turnover
• State funding issues
16
Collaboration & CoordinationChallenges
Delays may be caused by:
• Differences in procedures
• Developing relationships and maintaining effective communication
• Changes/shortages in personnel
Almost all the steps along the transition timeline require effective communication and coordination.
17
Comprehensive and Targeted
Improvement Activities
Improvement Activities
In addition to improvements in data capacity, improvement activities were categorized as improvements to:
• Policies and Procedures
• Training and technical assistance
• Monitoring and data verification
• Interagency Collaboration and Coordination
19
Collaborative Improvement Activities
Collaborative activities between Part C & 619:
• Child identifiers that follow the child
• Mechanisms to share data elements
• Coordinated policy clarification
• Joint program evaluation
• Collaborative training
20
Part C - Explanation of Progress
Strategies specific to C-8 sub-indicators:
C8a –
• Clarifying requirements for documentation
• Modifying the IFSP to include sections designed to address outcomes, steps and services
• More states seem to be moving to statewide forms (17)
21
Part C – Explanation of Progress
C8b – Improvements in data systems, data management and interagency communication
C8c – strategies for local collaboration, data system alerts and local MOUs
22
Part B – Explanation of Progress The most frequently cited Part B
improvement activities reflected themes:
• Joint clarification of policies and procedures
• The ability to collect needed data elements.
• Collaborative Training, TA and other coordinated activities.
23
Themes - High Performing States• Embrace the mission: Promote young children’s successful
transitions through collaborative support of families by both Part C and Part B.
• Develop joint or coordinated policies and procedures to ensure the best possible transitions.
• Include quality measures about transition in on-going and joint monitoring activities.
• Continue to coordinate transition efforts between Part C & B in the ability to gather, report and analyze data.
• Together, use transition data to guide and improve transition processes and procedures.
24
Implications for Policy Makers • Knowledge and awareness of issues and
context for front line staff and families
• Deliberate, systematic anticipation of intended and unintended consequences
• Capacity of policies and procedures to create improvements
• Decisions influenced by program evaluation and family feedback
• Use of evidence-based practices when known
25
Implications for Administrators
• Knowledge of rules and policies• Promoting relationships with key partners• Designation of staff to be responsible for
transition• Administrative support for interagency
coordination• Ongoing training and orientation processes• Local agreements• Mechanism for input and feedback from families
26
Implications for Front Line Staff• Key source of accurate and consistent information for
families• Willingness to learn about other program’s rules and policies• Ability to access information and resources• Ability to develop relationships and partnerships• Support families while implementing requirements
27
Full Reports Available On-line
Part C
State Performance Plan
Annual Performance Report
2009 Indicator Analysis
FFY 2008-2009
http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/partc/
part-c_sppapr_10.pdf
(this link is available
from the webinar series page)
28
Full Reports Available On-line
Part B
State Performance Plan
Annual Performance Report
2009 Indicator Analysis
FFY 2008-2009
http://www.nectac.org/~pdfs/sec619/
part-b_sppapr_10.pdf
(this link is available
from the webinar series page)
29
http://www.nectac.org/topics/transition/ectransitionta.asp
OSEP SPP/APRCalendar
http://spp-apr-calendar.rrfcnetwork.org/
(these links are available from the webinar series page)
30
Transition Resources
National Early ChildhoodTransition Initiative
http://www.nectac.org/topics/transition/transition.asp
National Early Childhood Transition Center (NECTC)
http://www.hdi.uky.edu/SF/NECTC/Home.aspx
(these links are available from the webinar series page)
31
Transition Resources
NECTAC TransitionTopic Page
Early Childhood TransitionPart C Indicator C-8
& Part B Indicator B-12
Thank you for participating.
Presentations from this series and their related resources are made available on the NECTAC website at:
http://www.nectac.org/~calls/2010/partcapr/partcapr.asp
32