ea 2009 bengoetxea, zudaire, sendra, lanz and vergara
DESCRIPTION
EFFECT OF GRASS OR CONCENTRATE FEEDING SYSTEMS ON LAMB CARCASS AND MEAT QUALITYTRANSCRIPT
1
EFFECT OF GRASS OR CONCENTRATE FEEDING
SYSTEMS ON LAMB CARCASS AND MEAT
QUALITY
AUTHORS:
HAIZEA BENGOETXEA
EDURNE ZUDAIRE
JOSU BERGARA
YERAY LANZ
EDER SENDRA
2
CONTENTS
1- Introduction
2- Material and methods
3- Results
4- Discussion
5- Conclusions
6- Bibliography
3
(1) INTRODUCTION:
- The most important differences are in subcutaneous fat colour, meat flavour and carcase fatness
- Animals with concentrate diet have higher average daily gains
- Meat in a grass system is darker in colour
-The objective was to compare the meat quality when the lambs weight 35 kg
4
(2) MATERIAL AND METHODS
- ANIMALS AND DIETS:
- FEED COLLECTION AND ANALISED:
- SLAUGHTER PROCEDURES:
- 32 male Ile-de-France lambs were divided in four equal groups.- A different type of food was given to each group of animals.
- The sampling was done by taking an area of 200cm2 per hectare of grass and making a cut of 3 cm.
- The animals were slaughters when they had had 35 Kg
5
- MEAT INSTRUMENTAL QUALITY:
- MEAT SENSORY EVALUATION:
- CARCASS MEASUREMENTS:
- The carcasses were weighed and classified for muscular conformation and for fatness at the time of slaughter and 24 h later
- The right longissimus thoracic et lumborum muscle was excised 24 h post mortem and was determined the Ph
- Samples of longissimus lumborum were vacuum-packed
6
- Individual animals were considered as experimental units - STATISTYCAL ANALYSIS:
7
(3) RESULTS
DIETS CARACTHERISTICS:
The concentrate hadThe concentrate had:
- 18.2% of crude protein (CP)
- 24.7% neutral detergent fibre (NDF) on a dry matter basis.
CP NDF
Concentrate Diet
18.2% 24.7%
Grass diet 10.1% 59.2%
The grass had:The grass had: - 10.1% CP - 59.2% NDF
8
ANIMAL PERFORMANCE:
– Animals of high growth level younger than low growth level animals in the same weight (about 35 kg).
– % of the digestive tract higher in the grass lambs than in the stall lambs.
9
CARCASS CARACTHERISTICS:
– Carcasses formed grass lambs
» Had a lower muscular conformation
» Were less fatty than stall lambs.
– Lower proportion of fat
» Fat colour more yellow and they had harder fat than stall lambs.
10
– MUSCLE INSTRUMENTAL QUALITY:
- The longissimus muscle ultimate pH higher for the grass lambs compared to the stall lambs
- The colour up to 24 h display was lighter in the stall lambs.
- Higher intramuscular fat content than grass lambs.
11
SENSORY EVALUATION:
Meat from stall-fed lambs was more tender and juicy than from grass-fed lambs.
12
(4) DISCUSSION:
- CONCENTRATE FEED AND GRASS FEED DIFFERENCES:
- Dry matter:
- Fatness:
- Colour of carcasses:
- The PH:
- Flavour and fatty flavour:
13
(5) CONCLUSIONS:
COMPARISON:
– Grass fed vs concentrate fed– When? Slaughtered = body weight
THE GRASS LAMBS:
– lighter carcase – lower subcutaneous fat.
THE STALL LAMBS:
– softer fat – marginally tender to “livery flavour” and “fatty flavour”
notes.