e05 weikmann automated visual inspection (1)

Upload: florin-patrulescu

Post on 03-Jun-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    1/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    1

    Automated Visual Inspection of

    Pre-filled Syringes

    Wolfgang Weikmann

    Vetter Pharma-Fertigung GmbH & Co. KG

    24-25 February 2010, Tampa

    Content1. Manual Visual Inspection (MVI)

    Basic requirements

    .

    overview

    3. Qualification Approach

    1. PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations

    2. PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)

    2

    .4. Operational Approach

    5. Conclusion

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    2/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    2

    1. MVI Basic requirements

    Enclosed dedicated room Incandescent Lamp

    (light intensity: 2000-3750 LUX)

    Black & white background

    Reject bin / Eject bin for measurements

    Defect evaluation list (SOP)

    Temperature monitoring of room

    One product per room at a given time!

    Inspection speed

    3

    uncontrolled units, rejects and good pieces!

    Scheduled Eye Breaks

    2. AVI - Machine Overview

    Glass Barrel Remover(De-Trayer)

    Inspection MachineGlass Barrel Inserter

    (Re-Trayer)

    4

    Ejection o f syringes

    Good PiecesProduct for inspection

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    3/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    3

    2. AVI Machine Overview

    Unit 2 (TV 2a/3a & 2b/3b)

    Glass BarrelUnder- and Overfilling

    Empty syringe

    Dirt/Abrasion

    Unit 3 (TV 4/5)

    Closure PartMissing closure part

    Bent Needle Shield

    Fit of closure part/Total

    Unit 4 (TV 6/7)

    StopperForeign particles

    Solution in rib

    Dirt/abrasion

    Unit 5 (TV 8/9)

    & 7 (TV 12/13)

    SolutionForeign particles

    amage ev a on

    Scratches/Cracks zone 1

    Airline over total length

    Closure PartDirt/Abrasion

    Damage/ deviation

    Broken bridge

    Pierced Needle Shield

    Stopper position

    Upside-down (180)

    Crooked stopper

    Double stopper

    Unit 6 (TV 10/11)

    SolutionGlass splinters

    Unit 11 (HV)

    INFEEDOUTFEED

    0

    12

    5

    Unit 1 (TV 1)

    Glass BarrelDamaged finger rest

    Broken

    StopperMissing stopper

    Unit 9 (CA) and 10 (OD)

    SolutionDiscoloration, Turbidity

    Unit 8 (TV 14/15)

    Glass BarrelScratches/Cracks zone 2

    SolutionLeaking system

    34

    2. AVI Machine overview

    Eject 0

    Glass Barrel

    Damaged finger rest

    Eject 1

    Solution

    Discoloration, Turbidity

    Eject 3

    Solution

    Glass splinter

    Eject 2

    Solution

    Foreign particle

    INFEEDOUTFEED

    0

    12

    Broken

    Stopper

    Missing stopper

    n er- an over ng

    Empty syringe

    Leaked system

    Stopper

    Upside-down (180)

    Glass Barrel

    Dirt/Abrasion

    Damage/Deviation

    Scratches/Cracks area 1

    Scratches/Cracks area 2

    Airline over total length

    Closure Part

    Dirt/Abrasion

    Damage/Deviation

    Stopper

    Foreign particle

    Solution in rib

    Dirt/ abrasion

    Damage/ deviation

    Stopper position

    Crooked stopper

    Double Stopper

    6

    34

    Broken bridge

    Pierced Needle Shield

    Missing closure part

    Bent Needle Shield

    Fit of the closure part/Total

    length

    Other defects

    Wrong primary packaging

    component

    Eject 4After a machine failure or

    power break down, all

    remaining syringes in the

    machine are ejected here.

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    4/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    4

    3. Qualification / Validation Approach

    Design Qualification (DQ)

    Operational Qualification (OQ)

    Performance Qualification (PQ)

    PQ 1: Knapp test with Test kit

    P 2: Kna test with 3 commercial lots

    7

    in this presentation, focus on PQ

    3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations

    Definition of Spinning speed

    Definition of Ins ection area / windows

    Air bubbles

    Evaluation of different turbidity levels

    Evaluation of different colors of the

    roduct solution

    8

    Detection level of foreign matter

    depending on different filling levels

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    5/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    5

    3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations

    Light intensity Regular checks

    Definition of the max. holding time

    Measures to be taken in case of

    decrease of light intensity special

    maintenance / definition of acceptance

    criteria

    9

    Handling of exchange of lighting

    Burn-in time of LED spare parts to reachacceptable stability

    3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations

    Heat-up of syringes during machine

    stop Definition of max. break time

    without removal of syringes

    Definition of Defect categories(Assignment of minor, Major and Critical

    Creation of Batch Report)

    10

    Strategy for Manual Classification

    (Re-inspection) of Ejects

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    6/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    6

    3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations

    Handling / Risk assessment in case ofglass breakage at different locations

    within the machine

    Implementation of effective Line Cleaning

    and Line Clearance

    11

    3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit) Creation of a product specific Test

    kit (Rejects + Good pieces) 500 pieces in total comprising approx. 160

    Rejects

    Rejects selected from routine batches as

    far as possible

    O tional: Usa e of standardized articles

    12

    for better reproducibility in case of

    replacement due to destruction

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    7/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    7

    3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)

    Performance of the Knapp test MVI: 20 Visual Inspectors inspect each the

    test kit (500 pieces) / routine inspection

    conditions

    AVI: Test kit (approx. 160 Rejects) are run

    21 times in the production mode of the

    AVI machineAim: simulation of real

    13

    production conditions as listed in the

    following:

    3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit) AVI Efficiency Test

    1. Reject Rate (RR) Rejects

    1. Aim: Test of each Inspection unit per defect

    (10 runs per defect)

    2. AC: for each of the single defect categories:

    RR AVI RR MVI

    2. False Reject Rate (FRR) Good pieces

    14

    . good pieces

    2. AC: tbd. for each inspection unit

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    8/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    8

    3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)

    AVI Laboratory Test Run1. Reject Rate Rejects

    1. Testing each single Inspection unit

    1. Aim: Test of each Inspection unit with

    all related defects (10 runs per defect)

    2. AC: RR AVI RR MVI

    15

    .

    1. Aim: Test of all Inspection units with all

    defects (1 run with all defects)

    2. AC: RR AVI RR MVI

    3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)3. False Reject Rate Good pieces

    1. Aim: Test of all Inspection units with 2000

    2. AC: tbd. for the whole machine

    AVI Performance Run (Good pieces; atleast Placebo)

    16

    of detection within 3 technical runs of the

    same lot (10.000 syringes recommended)

    AC: tbd. dependent on Process Capability

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    9/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    9

    3.3 PQ 2: Knapp test (3 batches)

    17

    Evaluation

    M2.1 + M3.1 = RR AVIM3.1 + M4.1 = RR MVI

    Comparison

    RR MVI vs. RR AVI

    3.3 PQ 2: Knapp test (3 batches)

    Acceptance criteria:

    Different a roaches are ossible e. .:

    #1: RR AVI RR MVI for all defect categories,

    not dependent on criticality of the defect

    #2: Split into minor, Major and Critical:

    Number of defects with (RR AVI RR MVI) (RR

    AVI < RR MVI) per Criticality Class

    18

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    10/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    10

    4. Operational Approach

    19

    4. Operational Approach2. Manual Visual

    Classification

    Rejects

    3. AQL(Good Pieces of Eject 0-4)

    - a ues accor ng o

    Lot size = Sum of syringes of Ejects 0-4

    Sampling randomized of the Good Pieces

    (FRR) from Ejects 0-4:

    n = 125 (Lot size less than 3.200)

    Eject 1

    Eject 2

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Critical, Major, minor

    20

    n = o s ze e ween . an .

    n = 315 (Lot size between 10.001 and 35.000)Eject 3

    Eject 4 Good Pieces (FRR)

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Good Pieces (FRR)

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    11/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    11

    4. Operational Approach

    E ect 0Rejects

    2. Manual VisualClassification

    4. Batch Evaluation3. AQL(Good Pieces ofEjects 0-4)

    Eject 1

    Eject 2

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Evaluation according to AVI

    Evaluation matrix

    Critical: X limit Batch Release

    X > limit Deviation/Measures

    Major: X limit Batch Release

    X > limit Deviation/Measures

    minor: X limit Batch Release

    X > limit Deviation/Measures

    21

    Eject 3

    Eject 4

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects

    Good Pieces (FRR)

    Rejects (total)

    5. Conclusion

    Main topics to be considered upfront:

    Product characteristics

    Evaluation strategy / Assignment ofdefects to Eject bins

    Creation of the Test kit

    Acceptable False Reject Rate

    Re-Classification of Ejects

    22

    Performance of lighting Preventive maintenance

    Re-Qualification concept

  • 8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)

    12/12

    ISPE Tampa Conference

    22-25 February 2010

    Tampa, Florida USA

    12

    Thank You!

    Wolfgang Weikmann

    Director Pharmaceutical Production / En ineerin

    Vetter Pharma-Fertigung GmbH & Co. KGSchuetzenstrasse 87

    D - 88212 Ravensburg, Germany+49-(0)751-3700-2401

    [email protected]