e05 weikmann automated visual inspection (1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
1/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
1
Automated Visual Inspection of
Pre-filled Syringes
Wolfgang Weikmann
Vetter Pharma-Fertigung GmbH & Co. KG
24-25 February 2010, Tampa
Content1. Manual Visual Inspection (MVI)
Basic requirements
.
overview
3. Qualification Approach
1. PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations
2. PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)
2
.4. Operational Approach
5. Conclusion
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
2/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
2
1. MVI Basic requirements
Enclosed dedicated room Incandescent Lamp
(light intensity: 2000-3750 LUX)
Black & white background
Reject bin / Eject bin for measurements
Defect evaluation list (SOP)
Temperature monitoring of room
One product per room at a given time!
Inspection speed
3
uncontrolled units, rejects and good pieces!
Scheduled Eye Breaks
2. AVI - Machine Overview
Glass Barrel Remover(De-Trayer)
Inspection MachineGlass Barrel Inserter
(Re-Trayer)
4
Ejection o f syringes
Good PiecesProduct for inspection
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
3/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
3
2. AVI Machine Overview
Unit 2 (TV 2a/3a & 2b/3b)
Glass BarrelUnder- and Overfilling
Empty syringe
Dirt/Abrasion
Unit 3 (TV 4/5)
Closure PartMissing closure part
Bent Needle Shield
Fit of closure part/Total
Unit 4 (TV 6/7)
StopperForeign particles
Solution in rib
Dirt/abrasion
Unit 5 (TV 8/9)
& 7 (TV 12/13)
SolutionForeign particles
amage ev a on
Scratches/Cracks zone 1
Airline over total length
Closure PartDirt/Abrasion
Damage/ deviation
Broken bridge
Pierced Needle Shield
Stopper position
Upside-down (180)
Crooked stopper
Double stopper
Unit 6 (TV 10/11)
SolutionGlass splinters
Unit 11 (HV)
INFEEDOUTFEED
0
12
5
Unit 1 (TV 1)
Glass BarrelDamaged finger rest
Broken
StopperMissing stopper
Unit 9 (CA) and 10 (OD)
SolutionDiscoloration, Turbidity
Unit 8 (TV 14/15)
Glass BarrelScratches/Cracks zone 2
SolutionLeaking system
34
2. AVI Machine overview
Eject 0
Glass Barrel
Damaged finger rest
Eject 1
Solution
Discoloration, Turbidity
Eject 3
Solution
Glass splinter
Eject 2
Solution
Foreign particle
INFEEDOUTFEED
0
12
Broken
Stopper
Missing stopper
n er- an over ng
Empty syringe
Leaked system
Stopper
Upside-down (180)
Glass Barrel
Dirt/Abrasion
Damage/Deviation
Scratches/Cracks area 1
Scratches/Cracks area 2
Airline over total length
Closure Part
Dirt/Abrasion
Damage/Deviation
Stopper
Foreign particle
Solution in rib
Dirt/ abrasion
Damage/ deviation
Stopper position
Crooked stopper
Double Stopper
6
34
Broken bridge
Pierced Needle Shield
Missing closure part
Bent Needle Shield
Fit of the closure part/Total
length
Other defects
Wrong primary packaging
component
Eject 4After a machine failure or
power break down, all
remaining syringes in the
machine are ejected here.
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
4/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
4
3. Qualification / Validation Approach
Design Qualification (DQ)
Operational Qualification (OQ)
Performance Qualification (PQ)
PQ 1: Knapp test with Test kit
P 2: Kna test with 3 commercial lots
7
in this presentation, focus on PQ
3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations
Definition of Spinning speed
Definition of Ins ection area / windows
Air bubbles
Evaluation of different turbidity levels
Evaluation of different colors of the
roduct solution
8
Detection level of foreign matter
depending on different filling levels
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
5/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
5
3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations
Light intensity Regular checks
Definition of the max. holding time
Measures to be taken in case of
decrease of light intensity special
maintenance / definition of acceptance
criteria
9
Handling of exchange of lighting
Burn-in time of LED spare parts to reachacceptable stability
3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations
Heat-up of syringes during machine
stop Definition of max. break time
without removal of syringes
Definition of Defect categories(Assignment of minor, Major and Critical
Creation of Batch Report)
10
Strategy for Manual Classification
(Re-inspection) of Ejects
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
6/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
6
3.1 PQ: Pre-tests / Considerations
Handling / Risk assessment in case ofglass breakage at different locations
within the machine
Implementation of effective Line Cleaning
and Line Clearance
11
3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit) Creation of a product specific Test
kit (Rejects + Good pieces) 500 pieces in total comprising approx. 160
Rejects
Rejects selected from routine batches as
far as possible
O tional: Usa e of standardized articles
12
for better reproducibility in case of
replacement due to destruction
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
7/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
7
3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)
Performance of the Knapp test MVI: 20 Visual Inspectors inspect each the
test kit (500 pieces) / routine inspection
conditions
AVI: Test kit (approx. 160 Rejects) are run
21 times in the production mode of the
AVI machineAim: simulation of real
13
production conditions as listed in the
following:
3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit) AVI Efficiency Test
1. Reject Rate (RR) Rejects
1. Aim: Test of each Inspection unit per defect
(10 runs per defect)
2. AC: for each of the single defect categories:
RR AVI RR MVI
2. False Reject Rate (FRR) Good pieces
14
. good pieces
2. AC: tbd. for each inspection unit
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
8/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
8
3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)
AVI Laboratory Test Run1. Reject Rate Rejects
1. Testing each single Inspection unit
1. Aim: Test of each Inspection unit with
all related defects (10 runs per defect)
2. AC: RR AVI RR MVI
15
.
1. Aim: Test of all Inspection units with all
defects (1 run with all defects)
2. AC: RR AVI RR MVI
3.2 PQ 1: Knapp test (Test kit)3. False Reject Rate Good pieces
1. Aim: Test of all Inspection units with 2000
2. AC: tbd. for the whole machine
AVI Performance Run (Good pieces; atleast Placebo)
16
of detection within 3 technical runs of the
same lot (10.000 syringes recommended)
AC: tbd. dependent on Process Capability
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
9/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
9
3.3 PQ 2: Knapp test (3 batches)
17
Evaluation
M2.1 + M3.1 = RR AVIM3.1 + M4.1 = RR MVI
Comparison
RR MVI vs. RR AVI
3.3 PQ 2: Knapp test (3 batches)
Acceptance criteria:
Different a roaches are ossible e. .:
#1: RR AVI RR MVI for all defect categories,
not dependent on criticality of the defect
#2: Split into minor, Major and Critical:
Number of defects with (RR AVI RR MVI) (RR
AVI < RR MVI) per Criticality Class
18
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
10/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
10
4. Operational Approach
19
4. Operational Approach2. Manual Visual
Classification
Rejects
3. AQL(Good Pieces of Eject 0-4)
- a ues accor ng o
Lot size = Sum of syringes of Ejects 0-4
Sampling randomized of the Good Pieces
(FRR) from Ejects 0-4:
n = 125 (Lot size less than 3.200)
Eject 1
Eject 2
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Critical, Major, minor
20
n = o s ze e ween . an .
n = 315 (Lot size between 10.001 and 35.000)Eject 3
Eject 4 Good Pieces (FRR)
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Good Pieces (FRR)
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
11/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
11
4. Operational Approach
E ect 0Rejects
2. Manual VisualClassification
4. Batch Evaluation3. AQL(Good Pieces ofEjects 0-4)
Eject 1
Eject 2
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Good Pieces (FRR)
Evaluation according to AVI
Evaluation matrix
Critical: X limit Batch Release
X > limit Deviation/Measures
Major: X limit Batch Release
X > limit Deviation/Measures
minor: X limit Batch Release
X > limit Deviation/Measures
21
Eject 3
Eject 4
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects
Good Pieces (FRR)
Rejects (total)
5. Conclusion
Main topics to be considered upfront:
Product characteristics
Evaluation strategy / Assignment ofdefects to Eject bins
Creation of the Test kit
Acceptable False Reject Rate
Re-Classification of Ejects
22
Performance of lighting Preventive maintenance
Re-Qualification concept
-
8/12/2019 E05 Weikmann Automated Visual Inspection (1)
12/12
ISPE Tampa Conference
22-25 February 2010
Tampa, Florida USA
12
Thank You!
Wolfgang Weikmann
Director Pharmaceutical Production / En ineerin
Vetter Pharma-Fertigung GmbH & Co. KGSchuetzenstrasse 87
D - 88212 Ravensburg, Germany+49-(0)751-3700-2401