dynamics of single ingan quantum dots xford
TRANSCRIPT
Dynamics of Single InGaN Quantum DotsR.A. Taylor *, J.W. Robinson , J.H. Rice , A. Jarjour , J.D. Smith , R.A. Oliver , G.A.D. Briggs , M.J. Kappers ,C.J. Humphreys , Y. Arakawa
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 3 4
1
2
3
4
Clarendon Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford Ox1 3PU, U.K.
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, U.K.
Department of Materials, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, U.K.
Institute of Industrial Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1 Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
Figure 5.(a) Time-resolved PL from a single InGaN QD
at 4.2 K (Tokyo sample), trace recorded at 2.863 eV
corresponding to the dominant dot in (c), together
with the wetting layer emission at 2.873 eV (curve
with faster decay). (b) Corrected QD decay trace
from the InGaN QD following subtraction of wetting
layer. (c) Time-integrated photoluminescence from
InGaN QDs at 4.2 K at an excitation power of 70 W.�
Figure 1. (a) and (b) - AFM scans of uncapped dot samples grown in
Cambridge. (c) Opitcal microscope image of Al mask on dot sample.
(d) Dimensions of typical dot from Cambridge sample. (e) and (f) -
Schematic of growth layers in both the Cambridge and Tokyo sample.
Figure 3. Experimental arrangement for time-resolved
and time-integrated single dot spectroscopy. The excitation
source is a frequency-tripled Ti:sapphire laser, giving 100fs
pulses at 266 nm. The microscope objective is a 36x
catadioptric unit. The time-correlated photon counting unit
has a time-resolution of 150 ps.
Plate 1. Experimental layout showing the two spectrographs
used for detection. In the foreground the piezo mounted
catadioptric objective can be seen. The microscope cryostat
is mounted on an xy stage below the objective.
Experiment
Figure 4. (a) Time-resolved PL from a single InGaN QDat 4.2 K (Cambridge sample). PL trace recorded at2.824 eV corresponding to the dominant dot in (c),together with the wetting layer emission at 2.817 eV(curve with faster decay). (b) Corrected QD decaytrace from the InGaN QD following subtraction ofwetting layer. (c) Time-integrated photoluminescencefrom InGaN QDs at 4.2 K at an excitation power of
275 W, indicating the dot used for the time-resolvedmeasurements.
�
xford
hysics
2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95 3.00
2.35
0.97
1.392.19
1.02
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Energy (eV)
0 10 20 30 40 501.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
2.80 2.81 2.82 2.83 2.84
(b)
Lifetim
e(n
s)
Temp (K)
(a)
6050
4030
20
16
12
8
4 K
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Energy (eV)
Time-resolved spectroscopy:time-correlated singlephoton counting
Time-integratedspectroscopy: micro-photoluminescence
Cube beamsplitter
Microscope objective
Cryostat
Monochromator
Ti:Al O
laser2 3
Frequencytripler
Monochromator
CCD
PMT
Quantum dot dimensions
20 nm
4 nm14 nm
1500nm
GaN Capping Layer
InGaN QD
GaN Buffer Layer
Al O Substrate2 3
Tokyo Sample
7 nm
2500nm
GaN Capping Layer
InGaN QD
GaN Buffer Layer
Al O Substrate2 3
Cambridge Sample
2 m hole�
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
1 m x AFM scan� 1 m� 0.4 m m� �x 0.4 AFM scan
2.70 2.75 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Energy(eV)
0 2 4 6 80 2 4 6 8 10
(b)
T1= 2.59 ns
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Time (ns)
(a)
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Time (ns)
(c)
0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5
(b)
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Time (ns)
(a)
T1= 1.07 ns
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Time (ns)
2.75 2.80 2.85 2.90 2.95 3.00
PL
Inte
nsity
(au)
Energy(eV)
(c)
Growth of InGaN epilayer Formation of In-richregions by spinodaldecomposition
In on surface
Decomposition of In-rich regions in N
atmosphere - In and N2
2
Formation of nanoscopicmetallic droplets
Re-nitridation of dropletsin initial stage of cappinglayer growth
Completion of cappinglayer growth; someinter-diffusion of Ga
Possible dot formation mechanism by modified droplet epitaxy (Oxford sample)
NH3 TMG
Figure 7. Micro-PL spectra from several single dots at 4.2 K.
The measured decay times in nanoseconds for some individual
dots are shown above each dot.
Figure 6. (a) Time integrated PL spectra for a single InGaN
QD from 4.2 K to 60 K (Cambridge sample). (b) Variation in
T with temperature for the single QD shown in (a).1
Figure 2. Diagram showing the suggested stages involved in the growth of the
Cambridge sample.
Y. Arakawa, IEEE J. Selected topics in quantum electronics 8 (2002) 823R.A. Oliver, G.A.D. Briggs, M.J. Kappers, C.J. Humphreys, J.H. Rice, J.D. Smith,and R.A. Taylor, Appl. Phys. Lett, Accepted for publication, July 2003F. Widmann, B. Daudin, G. Feuillet, Y. Samson, J. L. Rouvière, and N. Pelekanos,J. Appl. Phys. 83 (1998) 7618 K. Tachibana, T. Someya, and Y. Arakawa, Appl.Phys. Lett. 74 (1998) 383O. Moriwaki, T. Someya, K. Tachibana, S. Ishida, and Y. Arakawa, Appl. Phys.Lett. 76 (2000) 2361I.L. Krestnikov, N.N. Ledentsov, A. Hoffmann, D. Bimberg, A.V. Sakharov,W.V. Lundin, A.F. Tsatsul'nikov, A.S. Usikov, Z.I. Alferov, Y.G. Musikhin,D. Gerthsen. Phys. Rev. B. 66 (2002) 155310J. Simon, E. Martinez-Guerrero, C. Adelmann, G. Mula, B. Daudin, G. Feuillet,H. Mariette, and N.T. Pelekanos. Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 224 (2001) 13A. Morel, P. Lefebvre, T. Taliercio, T. Bretagnon, B. Gil, N. Grandjean, B. Damilano,and J. Massies, Physica E 17 (2003) 64K. Asaoka, Y. Ohno, S. Kishimoto, and T. Mizutani, Jap. J. Appl. Phys.Part 1 38 (1999) 546 T. Takagahara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 3577
References
The photoluminescence decay of single InGaN QDs has been measured between 4.2 K and 60 K using a time-correlated photon
counting system in conjunction with a conventional micro-photoluminescence setup. Two different samples, grown in
Cambridge and in Japan, were studied. The recombination is characterized by a single exponential decay, in contrast to the
non-exponential decay from the wetting layer. We have shown that for ensemble measurements a non-exponential signal may
arise from the combination of the QD and wetting layer luminescence. Our results suggest that different growth methods
give rise to fairly similar luminescence properties. Increasing the temperature leads to a reduction in the PL decay time of a single
InGaN QD over the range measured.
This work was supported in part by the Foresight LINK Award , funded by DTI/EPSRC
(GR/R66029/01) and Hitachi Europe Ltd., and by Hewlett-Packard Laboratories. We would like to thank Shazia Yasin for her
assistance in masking the samples.
Nanoelectronics at the Quantum Edge