dynamic plant uptake modeling stefan trapp. steady-state considerations: simple & small data...

28
Dynamic plant uptake modeling Stefan Trapp

Upload: mervin-hall

Post on 14-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Dynamic plant uptake modeling

Stefan Trapp

Steady-state considerations: simple & small data need

However: often emission pattern is non-steady, e.g.: non-steady plant growth (logistic) pesticide spraying application of manure and sewage sludge on

agricultural fields

In these scenarios: steady-state solutions are not valid, and dynamic simulation is required.

Steady-state vs. dynamic models

• Three different types of input, namely• pulse input (pesticide spraying)

• constant input (deposition from air)• irregular input (this we cannot solve --> use numerical integration)

Dynamic input patterns

Dynamic models

Designed for

- repeated input- dynamic growth- pesticides- manure or sewage appl. - 1 year or 10 year - easy to handle (excel)

1.0E-06

1.0E+00

2.0E+00

3.0E+00

4.0E+00

5.0E+00

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Real time (d)

C(t

)

C3 Stem C2 root C4 Fruit

C1 soil bioavailable C4a Leaves

● Repeated pulse input from soil or air or constant emission

● Logistic growth of plants (here: summer wheat)

● n variable periods (30 in practice)

Dynamic models

Dynamic Model

Differential equation system

In words

soil: change of mass = + Input - degradation - uptake into plants

roots: change of mass = + uptake from soil - loss to stem - degradation

stem: change of mass = + uptake from roots - loss to leaves (fruits) - deg

leaves: change of mass = +uptake from stem ± exchange air - degradation

fruits: change of mass = +uptake from stem ± exchage air - degradation

Differential equation system

soil

roots

(stem)

leaves

fruits

inputQKM

CCk

dt

dC

SWSoil

SoilSoil

Soil deg

RRRRWRRSW

SoilR CkMQKCMQK

C

dt

dC ///

StStStStWStRW

RSt

St CkMQKCK

CMQ

dt

dC ///

LLLLLA

LA

L

depLSt

StWL

LL CkCMK

mLgAC

M

vAC

KM

Q

dt

dC

31000

FFFFFA

FA

F

FSt

StWF

FF CkCMK

mLgAC

M

gAC

KM

Q

dt

dC

31000

Cascade of compartments

111 mk

dt

dm 2211

2 mkmkdt

dm

Mass balance:

"The change of mass in tank 2 is what flows out of tank 1 minus what flows out of tank 2"

Differential equation system

1 soil

2 roots

3 stem

4a leaves

4b fruits

1111 bCk

dt

dC

2221122 bCkCk

dt

dC

3332233 bCkCk

dt

dC

4443344 bCkCk

dt

dC

4443344 bCkCk

dt

dC

The system written in a schematic way:

Each DE always relates to the DE before, but not to any other DE

transfer rate constants kij (d-1)

loss rate constant ki (d-1)

constant external input b (mg kg-1 d-1).

Structure of the multi-cascade crop model

Dynamic Model

bC

kk

kk

kk

k

dt

Cd

434

323

212

1

00

00

00

000

Same processes, same differential equations, but formulated as matrix

1 is soil k1 loss rate k12 transfer rate2 is roots k2 loss rate k23 transfer rate 3 is stem k3 loss rate k34 transfer rate 4 is leaves or fruits k4 loss rate

b is the input vector

Steady-state solution

Set dC/dt (left hand) to zero. Then

Cascade

etc.

1

1

11

11 )(

k

b

Mk

ItC

)()( 12

12

22

22 tC

k

k

Mk

ItC

)()( 23

23

33

33 tC

k

k

Mk

ItC

Conc. = Input / loss

tkeCtC 1)0()( 11

tktktk

eCkk

e

kk

eCktC 2

21

)0()()(

)0()( 22112

1122

tk

tktk

tktktk

eC

kk

e

kk

eCk

kkkk

e

kkkk

e

kkkk

eCkktC

3

32

321

)0(

)()()0(

))(())(())(()0()(

3

3223223

231332123121123123

etc. …

Analytical solution for pulse input, i.e. C(0) ≠ 0

tktk eCek

btC 11 01 1

1

11

tktktktk eCeBeeAtC 2221 01 22

tktktktktktk eCeFeeEeeDtC 333231 01 33

112

1121121 0

kkk

bkkkCA

21

21112

kk

bkbkB

13

23

kk

kAD

23

223 0

kk

BACkE

3

323

k

bBkF

Cascade with constant input

Analytical solution for all t

That's what you always wanted to know

about math, wasn't it?

Questions?

Principle of superposition

Concentrations are additive

We can thus calculate several subsequent periods with different values, and the output from one period is the input to the next.

This allows to simulate non-constant conditions.

Our "cascade model" has by default 24 periods to 5 days (= 120 days, i.e. one vegetation period), but this is variable.

Principle of superposition

Figure: Concentrations are additive

Most annual crops show a logistic growth curve initial growth is exponential

towards ripening, growth slows down

and finally stops

Change of plant mass M [kg]:

Plant growth

max

1M

MMk

dt

dM k First-order rate constant (for exponential growth)

[1/d]

Mmax Maximum plant mass [kg]

tke

MM

MtM

11

0

max

max

Plant mass as a function of time

M0 Initial plant mass [kg]

Growth and transpiration of plants are related by

the water use efficiency (kg plant / L water) or the

transpiration coefficient TC (L water / kg plant).

Typical values range between 200 and 1000 L/kg dry weight

Default value for TC is 100 L/kg fresh weight.

Plant growth and transpiration

max

1M

MMkT

dt

dMTQ CC

Q Transpiration [L/d]

TC Transpiration coefficient [L/kg dw]

In our model, transpiration takes place only when plants are growing

Data obtained from agricultural handbooks (summer wheat)

Annual seed plant

- Initial mass 10-4 kg (0.1 g for seeds)- Growth rate constant k = 0.1 d-1 (doubling time ≈ 1 week)- Final mass 1 kg

data related to 1 m2

Transpiration coefficient TC = 50 L/kg fw (water content green plans ≈ 90%)

Plant growth and transpiration

Standard scenario: summer wheat

tk

eMM

MtM

11

0

max

max

max

1M

MMkT

dt

dMTQ CC

Maximum transpiration Qmax is at ½ Mmax (inflection point)

with maxmax 41 MkTQ C

at time

1

1ln

1

0max MMkt

Plant growth and transpirationPlant growth and transpiration

Annual seed plant

Plant growth and transpiration

Growth is exponentialfor t < 70 d

Absolute growth & transpiration peak at t = 92 d

Growth almost stops for t > 135 d

= phase in which fruit or corn ripe leaves decay and plants dry out

Biomass M and transpiration Q of summer wheat

Dynamic model: Default scenario

Reading:

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Time (d)

C(t)

C3 Stem C2 root C4 Fruit C1 soil

Example simulation for a repeated pesticide application

Repeated application of insecticide by drip irrigation to soil

Comparison to measured data

Model result before calibration

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Time (d)

C Fr

uit

Measured Model

Comparison to measured data

After fit of two parameters (temperature, soil depth)

00.05

0.10.15

0.20.25

0.3

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Time (d)

C Fr

uit

Measured Model

More reading:

Lucky You - you survived this part.

Questions?