dutch chamber the baltic dry index

1
Investment Focus A s this edition concerns logistics and transport within Asia I thought I would spend some time discussing a shipping indicator, and what many people also believe can predict economic activity (and potential investment returns) - The Baltic Dry Index. In 1998 the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) was created by the UK-based Company Baltic Exchange Ltd with the ambition of offering a reli- able measure of the changes in cost of raw material sea transporta- tion. The BDI is a composite of the Baltic Capesize, Panamax, Handysize and Supramax indices. It is an assessment of the aver- age price to ship raw materials (such as coal, iron ore, cement and grains) on a number of shipping routes (about 50) and by ship size. It is thus an indicator of the cost paid to ship raw materials on global markets and an important component of input costs. As such, the index can be considered to be a forward indicator of eco- nomic activity. Put simply, if there is a high demand to ship goods globally you would expect high shipping costs and high economic activity in the future as the goods are delivered, received and processed. Equally the inverse theoretically should be true, if there is a lower demand to ship goods globally you would expect ship- ping costs to drop and economic activity to be lower in the future as there would be fewer goods in the chain. This theoretical environment was highly favorable to the use of the BDI as one of the most respected leading macroeconomic indicators by many leading economists and institutions. Indeed it proved to be reliable for a while as it worked during the 2000 and 2008 crisis. Since 2009 however the correlation has diverged raising doubts on the validity of its use. Aside from the reduced correlation since 2009 we have also seen heightened volatility as illustrated in Fig 1 below. Since the peak in 2008, the index has lost close to 90%, making this an investor’s nightmare, but potentially a traders dream. When looking further into the detailed reasons behind this erratic behavior, a couple of observations can be made. The main one is a lagging effect: ships are ordered when freight costs are high but can be delivered at a time when the demand is low, thereby caus- ing a further drop in freight transportation costs and misleading investors on the idea that the trade volume could be worsening. As an example, leading up to the financial crisis shipping compa- nies expected the show to go on. That is, they assumed growth would continue forever. To handle this projected growth, they ordered more ships. This led to a massive oversupply. The global economic crisis also led to a plunge in demand for shipping. These combined factors led to bankruptcies across the shipping industry. Industry-wide damage like this doesn’t repair itself overnight. Today, the industry is still undergoing consolidation. The BDI as explained above is also highly volatile by nature because it is linked to instable commodity shipping volumes that are not dependent exclusively on macroeconomic factors. For instance agricultural commodity volume depends on climatic conditions, energy trades can vary according to environmental laws and worldwide trade volume is impacted every year by sea- sonal effects, and holidays, etc… So in summary, The Baltic Dry index is probably less of an accu- rate indicator of the economic health of the world nowadays than may have been the case, and failing to admit the limitations can lead to a misreading of not only current economic conditions but also potential investment oppor- tunities. Good investing! DISCLAIMER:  The contents herein have been prepared only for general reference purpose. You must not rely on any of the contents, including any opinion or view, for making a decision of any kind, nor should such contents be construed as an offer, invitation, advertisement, inducement, representation, advice or recommendation of any kind. You should consult with a licensed investment adviser for obtaining professional investment advice that is tailored to suit your specific needs and situation. The Henley Group and its representatives make no guarantee, representation or warranty and accept no responsibility or liability as to the accuracy, completeness or correctness of the contents herein. The Baltic Dry Index z By Paul Brady, Partner, The Henley Group Limited. [email protected] Paul Brady 0 Jan-85 Jan-86 Jan-87 Jan-88 Jan-89 Jan-90 Jan-91 Jan-92 Jan-93 Jan-94 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Jan-11 Jan-12 Jan-13 Jan-14 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14 Figure 1 – UP, DOWN, ALL AROUND – The Baltic Dry Index Since 1985 Source: Bloomberg, Hofstra University

Upload: tyler-stuart

Post on 12-Jul-2015

25 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dutch chamber   the baltic dry index

Investment Focus

As this edition concerns logistics and transport within AsiaI thought I would spend some time discussing a shippingindicator, and what many people also believe can predict

economic activity (and potential investment returns) - The BalticDry Index.

In 1998 the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) was created by the UK-basedCompany Baltic Exchange Ltd with the ambition of offering a reli-able measure of the changes in cost of raw material sea transporta-tion. The BDI is a composite of the Baltic Capesize, Panamax,Handysize and Supramax indices. It is an assessment of the aver-age price to ship raw materials (such as coal, iron ore, cement andgrains) on a number of shipping routes (about 50) and by shipsize. It is thus an indicator of the cost paid to ship raw materialson global markets and an important component of input costs. Assuch, the index can be considered to be a forward indicator of eco-nomic activity. Put simply, if there is a high demand to ship goodsglobally you would expect high shipping costs and high economicactivity in the future as the goods are delivered, received andprocessed. Equally the inverse theoretically should be true, if thereis a lower demand to ship goods globally you would expect ship-ping costs to drop and economic activity to be lower in the futureas there would be fewer goods in the chain.

This theoretical environment was highly favorable to the use ofthe BDI as one of the most respected leading macroeconomicindicators by many leading economists and institutions. Indeedit proved to be reliable for a while as it worked during the 2000and 2008 crisis. Since 2009 however the correlation has divergedraising doubts on the validity of its use. Aside from the reducedcorrelation since 2009 we have also seen heightened volatility as

illustrated in Fig 1 below. Since the peak in 2008, the index haslost close to 90%, making this an investor’s nightmare, butpotentially a traders dream.

When looking further into the detailed reasons behind this erraticbehavior, a couple of observations can be made. The main one isa lagging effect: ships are ordered when freight costs are high butcan be delivered at a time when the demand is low, thereby caus-ing a further drop in freight transportation costs and misleadinginvestors on the idea that the trade volume could be worsening.As an example, leading up to the financial crisis shipping compa-nies expected the show to go on. That is, they assumed growthwould continue forever. To handle this projected growth, theyordered more ships. This led to a massive oversupply. The globaleconomic crisis also led to a plunge in demand for shipping.These combined factors led to bankruptcies across the shippingindustry. Industry-wide damage like this doesn’t repair itselfovernight. Today, the industry is still undergoing consolidation.

The BDI as explained above is also highly volatile by naturebecause it is linked to instable commodity shipping volumes thatare not dependent exclusively on macroeconomic factors. Forinstance agricultural commodity volume depends on climaticconditions, energy trades can vary according to environmentallaws and worldwide trade volume is impacted every year by sea-sonal effects, and holidays, etc…

So in summary, The Baltic Dry index is probably less of an accu-rate indicator of the economic health of the world nowadaysthan may have been the case, and failing to admit the limitationscan lead to a misreading of not only current economic conditions

but also potential investment oppor-tunities.

Good investing!

DISCLAIMER:  The contents herein havebeen prepared only for general referencepurpose. You must not rely on any ofthe contents, including any opinion orview, for making a decision of any kind,nor should such contents be construedas an offer, invitation, advertisement,inducement, representation, advice orrecommendation of any kind. Youshould consult with a licensedinvestment adviser for obtainingprofessional investment advice that istailored to suit your specific needs andsituation. The Henley Group and itsrepresentatives make no guarantee,representation or warranty and acceptno responsibility or liability as to theaccuracy, completeness or correctnessof the contents herein.

The Baltic Dry Indexz By Paul Brady, Partner, The Henley Group Limited. [email protected]

Paul Brady

0

Jan-

85

Jan-

86

Jan-

87

Jan-

88

Jan-

89

Jan-

90

Jan-

91

Jan-

92

Jan-

93

Jan-

94

Jan-

95

Jan-

96

Jan-

97

Jan-

98

Jan-

99

Jan-

00

Jan-

01

Jan-

02

Jan-

03

Jan-

04

Jan-

05

Jan-

06

Jan-

07

Jan-

08

Jan-

09

Jan-

10

Jan-

11

Jan-

12

Jan-

13

Jan-

14

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14

Figure 1 – UP, DOWN, ALL AROUND – The Baltic Dry Index Since 1985

Source: Bloomberg, Hofstra University

Conduit
Typewritten Text
Conduit
Typewritten Text
Conduit
Typewritten Text
Conduit
Typewritten Text
Conduit
Typewritten Text
Conduit
Typewritten Text
Investment Focus #170, the July/August 2014 issue
Conduit
Typewritten Text
Conduit
Typewritten Text