duke university chiho nonaka in collaboration with masayuki asakawa (kyoto university)...
TRANSCRIPT
Duke University
Chiho NONAKA
in Collaboration with
Masayuki Asakawa (Kyoto University)
Hydrodynamical Evolution Hydrodynamical Evolution near the QCD Critical End Pointnear the QCD Critical End Point
Hydrodynamical Evolution Hydrodynamical Evolution near the QCD Critical End Pointnear the QCD Critical End Point
June 26, 2003@HIC03, McGill University, Montreal
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA2
Critical End Point in QCD ?Critical End Point in QCD ? Critical End Point in QCD ?Critical End Point in QCD ?
Z. Fodor and S. D. Katz(JHEP 0203 (2002) 014)
dynamical staggered quarks
not fully quantitatively reliabl e
2 1
4
f
t
n
L
= +
Þ=
NJL model (Nf = 2)
Lattice (with Reweighting)
K. Yazaki and M.Asakawa., NPA 1989
Suggestions
2SC CFL
T
RHIC
GSI
Critical end point
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA3
Phenomenological Consequence ?Phenomenological Consequence ? Phenomenological Consequence ?Phenomenological Consequence ?
Divergence of Fluctuation Correlation Length
critical end point
M. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, and E.Shuryak, PRL81 (1998) 4816
Still we need to study EOS
Focusing
Dynamics (Time Evolution)
Hadronic Observables : NOT directly reflect properties at E
Fluctuation, Collective Flow
If expansion is adiabatic.
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA4
How to Construct EOS with CEP?
Assumption
Critical behavior dominates in a large region near end point
Near QCD end point singular part of EOS
Mapping
Matching with known QGP and
Hadronic entropy density
Thermodynamical quantities
EOS with CEPEOS with CEPEOS with CEPEOS with CEP
r hT
QGP
Hadronic
, T),( hr ),( T
),( hr ),( T
fieldmagnetic extermal : h
T
TTr
C
C
3d Ising ModelSame Universality Class
QCD
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA5
EOS of 3-d Ising ModelEOS of 3-d Ising ModelEOS of 3-d Ising ModelEOS of 3-d Ising ModelParametric Representation of EOS
)1(
)00804.076201.0()(~
2
5300
0
Rr
hRhRhh
RMM
8.4
326.0
Guida and Zinn-Justin NPB486(97)626
)154.1,0( R
C
C
T
TTr
h : external magnetic field
QCDMapping
T
r
h
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA6
Thermodynamical QuantitiesThermodynamical QuantitiesThermodynamical QuantitiesThermodynamical Quantities
Singular Part of EOS near Critical Point
Gibbs free energy
Entropy density
Matching
Entropy density
Thermodynamical quantities
Baryon number density, pressure, energy density
),(),( 200 gRMhrMF
)(')1()()2(2)21)((~ 2222 ggh
11.0MhrMFrhG ),(),(
T
r
r
G
T
h
h
G
T
GS
hr
C
),(),(tanh12
1),(),(tanh1
2
1),( BBcBBcB TSTSTSTSTS QHreal
model, volume excludedH :S phase QGPQ :S
r hT
QGP
Hadronic
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA7
Equation of StateEquation of StateEquation of StateEquation of State
CEP
Entropy Density Baryon number density
[MeV] 367.7 [MeV], EET 7.154
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA8
Comparison with Comparison with Bag + Excluded Volume EOSBag + Excluded Volume EOS
Comparison with Comparison with Bag + Excluded Volume EOSBag + Excluded Volume EOS
With End Point
Bag Model + Excluded Volume Approximation(No End Point)
Focused Not Focused
= Usual Hydro Calculation
n /s trajectories in T- planeB
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA9
Slowing out of EquilibriumSlowing out of Equilibrium Slowing out of EquilibriumSlowing out of Equilibrium
B. Berdnikov and K. Rajagopal,Phys. Rev. D61 (2000) 105017
Berdnikov and Rajagopal’s Schematic Argument
along r = const. line
Correlation lengthlonger than eq
h
faster (shorter) expansion
rh
slower (longer) expansion
Effect of Focusing on ?
Focusing Time evolution : Bjorken’s solution along nB/s fm, T0 = 200 MeV
eq
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA10
Correlation Length (I)Correlation Length (I)Correlation Length (I)Correlation Length (I)
1/222
eq ),(M
rgMfMr
Widom’s scaling low
eq
depends on n /s.• Max.• Trajectories pass through the region where is large. (focusing)
eq
eq
B
rh
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA11
Correlation Length (II)Correlation Length (II)Correlation Length (II)Correlation Length (II)
,00
zma
m
time evolution (1-d)
)(
1)()()(
eq
mmmd
d
1m
Model C (Halperin RMP49(77)435)17.2z
• is larger than at Tf. • Differences among s on n /s are small.• In 3-d, the difference between and becomes large due to transverse expansion.
eq
eq
B
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA12
Consequences in Experiment (I)Consequences in Experiment (I)Consequences in Experiment (I)Consequences in Experiment (I)CERES: nucl-ex/0305002 Fluctuations
CERES 40,80,158 AGeV Pb+Au collisions
No unusually large fluctuation
CEP exists in near RHIC energy region ?
T
dyn
dynPT P
2
2, )sgn(
PT
n
jj
n
jx
jxj
x
N
MMN
M
1
1
2
2
N
PM T
PTdybPT
222
,
Mean PT Fluctuation
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA13
Consequences in Experiment (II)Consequences in Experiment (II)Consequences in Experiment (II)Consequences in Experiment (II)
Xu and Kaneta, nucl-ex/0104021(QM2001)
Kinetic Freeze-out Temperature
J. Cleymans and K. Redlich, PRC, 1999
?
Low T comes from large flow.
f
?
Entropy density
EOS with CEP
EOS with CEP gives the natural explanation to the behavior of T .f
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA14
CEP and Its ConsequencesCEP and Its ConsequencesCEP and Its ConsequencesCEP and Its Consequences
Realistic hydro calculation with CEP
Future task
Slowing out of equilibrium
Large fluctuation
Freeze out temperature at RHIC
Fluctuation
Its Consequences
Focusing
Back UP
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA16
Hadronic ObservablesHadronic ObservablesHadronic ObservablesHadronic Observables
Fluctuations
Mean transverse momentum fluctuation
Charge fluctuations
D-measure
Dynamical charge fluctuation
Balance function
Collective Flow
Effect of EOS
Jeon and Koch PRL85(00)2076
Pruneau et al, Phys.Rev. C66 (02) 044904
Gazdzicki and Mrowczynski ZPC54(92)127
Korus and Mrowczynski, PRC64(01)054906
Asakawa, Heinz and Muller PRL85(00)2072
Bass, Danielewicz, Pratt, PRL85(2000)2689
Rischke et al. nucl-th/9504021
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA17
Baryon Number DensityBaryon Number DensityBaryon Number DensityBaryon Number Density ),0(,),( ''
0
BBB
T
BBBB ndTT
sPTn
Critical end point
1st order
crossover
c
c
dTdm
Crossover :
st order : ),0(,),( ''
0
BBB
T
BBBB ndTT
sPTn
))(,())(,()(
CBCHCBCQC
BC TTSTTST
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA18
nnBB/S contours/S contoursnnBB/S contours/S contoursS nB
nB/S
Focusing !
[MeV] 367.7 [MeV], EET 7.154
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA19
Focusing and CEPFocusing and CEPFocusing and CEPFocusing and CEP
MeV MeV, 7.3677.154 EE MT MeV MeV, 0.6527.143 EE MT
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA20
FocusingFocusingFocusingFocusingWhat is the focusing criterion ?
r h
T
h
r
CEP
snB / contours
,0
s
n
rB
)0( 0
hs
n
hB
)0( 0
hs
n
hB
02
2
s
n
rB 0r
From our model
),(),(12
1),(),(1
2
1),( BBcBBcB TSTSTSTSTS QHreal
Dominant termsCritical behavior
,cSr
cS
h
etc.
,0h ,0r
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA21
FocusingFocusingFocusingFocusing
Scavenius et al. PRC64(2001)045202
Analyses from Linear sigma model & NJL model
They found the Critical point in T- plane.
NJL model
Sigma model
The critical point does not serve as a “focusing” point !
Sigma model
NJL model
nB/S lines in plane
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA22
Hydrodynamical evolutionHydrodynamical evolutionHydrodynamical evolutionHydrodynamical evolutionAu+Au 150AGeV b=3 fm
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA23
Relativistic Hydrodynamical ModelRelativistic Hydrodynamical ModelRelativistic Hydrodynamical ModelRelativistic Hydrodynamical Model
Relativistic Hydrodynamical Equation
Baryon Number Density Conservation Equation
Lagrangian hydrodynamics
Space-time evolution of volume element
Effect of EoS
Flux of fluid
06/26/2003 C.NONAKA24
Sound VelocitySound VelocitySound VelocitySound Velocity
• Clear difference between n /s=0.01 and 0.03 B
Effect on Time Evolution Collective flow EOS
trajectoryof length total / :TOTAL snL B
Sound velocity along n /sB
/LTOTAL
/LTOTAL