drainage basin figure 11.3 copyright © 2010 pearson education, inc.christopherson, elemental...
TRANSCRIPT
Drainage Basin
Figure 11.3Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.Christopherson, Elemental Geosystems, Sixth Edition
Drainage Basins
Figure 11.5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.Christopherson, Elemental Geosystems, Sixth Edition
Drainage Basin System
Figure 11.4Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.Christopherson, Elemental Geosystems, Sixth Edition
Drainage Patterns
Figure 11.9
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.Christopherson, Elemental Geosystems, Sixth Edition
no structural control
structural domeconcentric rock
continental glaciation
topographic dome
jointing
folded structures
closely spaced faults/monoclines
Drainage Patterns
• Random– Dendritic
• f(topography)– Parallel– Radial
Drainage Patterns
• Random– Dendritic
• f(topography)– Parallel– Radial
• f(lithology)– Trellis– Joint trellis
Highly Dissected Drainage
Figure 11.8Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.Christopherson, Elemental Geosystems, Sixth Edition
how frequently streams occur on the land surface
Drainage Density
• Low– (<5km/km2)– low slope– low rainfall– permeable– dense vegetation
• High – (> 500 km/km2)– steep slope– high rainfall– impermeable rock
• Variables– Climate– Substrate– Slope– Vegetation
Badlands
• Very high drainage density!
• Why?
Drainage Basins
• Stream order (Strahler)
• Means of classifying basin size
• 1st order = no tributaries
• 2nd = two 1st
• 3rd = two 2nd
14 m across
3200 m across
Landscapes consist of ridge and valley topography at all scales, but only finest scale reveals the actual valley network and defines the transition between hillslopes and valley
Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science
c
b
Channel networks are of finite extent.
The spacing of the finest-scale valleys depends on the competition of valley cutting and hillslope eroding processes.
Fractal analysis breaks down at the channel-hillslope transition.
c
b
d
a
Limitations of Horton-Strahler ordering
• Order does not express the intuitive ‘size’ of a catchment very well
Both of these are of order 2, but one looks much ‘bigger’ than the other!
These look very similar in size, but the left hand net is of order 2, and the right hand net or order 3
Magnitude: an alternative approach (Shreve)
• Magnitude may give a better idea of the size of the network
• Shreve explored all the possible network topologies for a given magnitude
The left hand net has a magnitude of 9, and the right hand has a magnitude of 2
Both of these very similar networks have the same magnitude of 4
Magnitude and stream order
Magnitude of a basin is the number of first order or “exterior links” in a catchment. Magnitude correctly emphasizes identifying where the channel begins. Stream order is commonly done on nearly arbitrary network scales, and therefore means little. “Horton’s laws”, which are derived from analysis of stream orders, have no physical meaning.
Istanbulluoglu et al. JGR 2005 for gully head theory
Tucker and Bras, 1998, WRR for theory to landscape evolution
M = 9
N= 2M-1
N= number of links (exterior + interior)
For channel head theory, see:
Watershed Networks• Watershed network
comprised of – headwater and network
systems
• First and second order streams often comprise 70% of the stream network (Benda et al, 1992)
• High ecological value• Stream networks defined by:
– Nat’l Hydrography Dataset (1:100,00)
– Terrain analysis• (area, area-slope; area-length
thresholds)
0 7,100 14,200 21,300 28,4003,550
Meters
Legend
nednet
<all other values>
Order
1
2
3
4
Logan River Network and Watersheds
delineated by TauDEM
Effects of low order channels on downstream reaches in the network• Synchronous (or asynchronous) inflows of water,
sediment, nutrients, and organic matter create a variety of channel conditions and biological assemblages
• Connectivity of headwater systems to downstream reaches affects the cumulative and dispersed nature of material transport processes
• Gomi, et al, Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems, BioScience, Oct. 2002, vol. 52, no. 10
Watershed Delineation by Hand Digitizing
Watershed divide
Drainage direction Outlet
ArcHydro Page 57
River networks and channel morphology
1) Where do channels begin?
2) Channel network structure
Channel Initiation
• Channel head: the upstream limit of concentrated water flow between banks (Dietrich and Dunne, 1993)– a major boundary between hillslopes and channels– “pivot point” in sediment transport between diffusive
process and incisive process
• Channel initiation requires runoff• Channel initiation occurs by:
– saturated overland flow– seepage erosion– shallow landsliding
Channel Head Location and Topography
Montgomery and Dietrich, 1989
Channel head: threshold transition between hillslope and channel processes
Channel Initiation and Basin Morphometry
• Process model for channel initiation by shallow landsliding– convergent topography causes colluvium eroded from
adjacent hillslopes to accumulate– at critical threshold, landsliding occurs exposing
underlying material– erosion of underlying material by saturation overland
flow initiates channel
• Channel heads controlled by hillslope process rather than network extension
• Inverse of source basin length ~ drainage density
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4
g ra d ie n t
1
10
100
1000
10000
dra
ina
ge
are
a p
er
con
tou
r le
ng
th, a
/b (
m)
C onvergent
D ivergent
Valleys
Hillslopes
Dietrich et al., 2003, PIG
Stock and Dietrich, 2003, WRR
Coos Bay, OR
Dietrich & Perron, in press,Nature
Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science
channeled
channel head
unchanneled
Oregon Coast Range N. California
S. California Summary
Dietrich et al. 1992 Geology
T= transmissivity
q= effective rainfall
M=slope
= friction angle
= slope angle
= roughness and transport parameters
Example for humid, soil mantled landscape
Application of slope- area channel threshold to a digital terrain model
unchanneled = hillslope
transition
channeled
Observed channel in the field
Montgomery and Dietrich, 1992, Science
Summary
1) Channel heads typically occur at threshold changes in dominant transport process, and depend both on drainage area and local slope.
2) Channel network structure imparts a transport distance structure (width function) that influences sediment routing.