Draft : Which beams in the injectors fulfil HL-LHC Upgrade Scenario 1 goals?

S. Gilardoni et al.

RLIUP technical meeting 18/10/2013

Agenda

- Summary of US1 beam parameters- Possible production schemes

- 3-splitting

- BCMS- Summary of issues in the injectors:

- PSB - Space charge: L4 connection

- PS - Space charge: PSB@2 GeV

- Headtail instability

- Longitudinal stability : Finemet cavity

- Electron cloud : transverse damper

- SPS- Space Charge: well matched to PS space charge

- Maximum available RF power: 200 MHz LL and HL upgrade

- Electron cloud: effect on emittance or intensity?

Performance summary (US1-LHC vs. US1-LIU)

Ib(1011) ε (μm 1σ norm)

US1 requirements(LHC collision/injection Βaseline)

1.5/1.58 1.5/1.25

US1 requirements(LHC collision/injection Alternate)

1.2/1.26 1/0.83

Linac4 + 2 GeV + SPS LLRF upgrade US1(PS Standard scheme – 72 bchs)

1.45 1.37

Linac4 + 2 GeV + full SPS upgrade(PS Standard scheme – 72 bchs)

2.0 1.88

Linac4 + 2 GeV + SPS LLRF upgrade(PS BCMS scheme – 48 bchs)

1.45 0.91

Linac4 + 2 GeV + full SPS upgrade(PS BCMS scheme – 48 bchs)

2.0 1.37

200 MHz Power upgrade necessary to match the requirements of US1 with unchanged longitudinal parameters at LHC injection.

Transverse emittance required increased 1 μm emittances not requested any longer (see O. Brunning talk)

Challenges of the traditional schemes

High intensity injected in PSB:

- every PSB bunch is split 12 times (to get finally 72 bunches at 25 ns spacing, less for BCMS)

- Space-charge issue

- Today limited brilliance due to multiturn injection process

Long waiting time at PS injection:

- Space-charge issue.

- Headtail instability.

Long waiting time at SPS injection:

- Space-charge.

- TMCI instabilities

Many RF systems involved:

- Longitudinal instabilities and limitations to be overcome in all the machines

Beam quality is an issue:

- PS-SPS very sensitive to difference in relative bunch population

- LHC final luminosity very sensitive to degradation of transverse emittance

Basic Principles of US1 Injector upgradeOvercome main limitations of LHC injectors (brief intro summary):

Space charge current limitations

− PSB injection : Increase injection energy in the PSB from 50 to 160 MeVLinac4 (160 MeV H-) to replace Linac2 (50 MeV H+)Prove operation with Laslett larger than |0.36| @ 160 MeV (today |0.7|, required max. |0.5|)

− PS injection: Increase injection energy in the PS from 1.4 to 2 GeVProve operation with Laslett larger than |0.31| @ 2 GeV

− SPS injection if confirm current operational limitProve operation with Laslett larger than |0.21|

Transverse/Longitudinal stability limits

− Transient beam loading and CBI in the PS

− RF limitations in SPS

Electron cloud related issues

− Wideband transverse damper in SPS

− SPS vacuum chamber coating+scraping+wide band damper

Upgrade the PSB , PS and SPS to make them capable to accelerate and manipulate a higher brightness beam (feedbacks, cures against electron clouds, hardware modifications to reduce impedance, improve beam instrumentations…)

7

PS intensity limitations

12

Acceleration/Bunch splittingsLongitudinal CBITransient beam loadingTransition crossing

Injection flat bottom:Space chargeHeadtail instability

Flat top:Longitudinal CBIElectron cloudTransverse instabilities

0 0.5 1 1.5 20

0.05

0.1

0.15

time [us]

e-c

lou

d s

ign

al [

a.u

. ]

Av. intensity = 1.33*1011 ppb

0 0.5 1 1.5 20

2

4

6

time [us]

Pic

k-u

p s

ign

al [

a.u

.]

SPS intensity limitations

13S. Gilardoni – HB2012

Injection flat bottom:Capture lossesLongitudinal instabilitySpace chargeTMCI

Along the whole cycle:Longitudinal instabilityElectron cloud

26 GeV

450 GeV

Risk analysis

Y2-N200 Y2-Y200

PSB/PS Beam transfer@2GeV

Commissioning new extraction-injection

Commissioning new extraction-injection

FB PS - headtail Headtail ~ as today Headtail ~ as today

FB PS – SC Confortable Confortable

E-cloud PS Damper if needed Damper if needed

SPS - SC Limit in PS Limit in PS

SPS 200 MHz upgrade @ extraction

1.45e11 2e11

E-cloud in SPS Eventually BCMS should be better

Eventually BCMS should be better

Conclusions

• US1 requirements can be fulfilled if the 200 MHz power upgrade is added to PSB@2GeV

• 200 MHz Power upgrade necessary to match the requirements of US1 with unchanged longitudinal parameters at LHC injection (bunch length in particular)

• “Matching” of maximum Laslett tune shift currently achieved during normal operations with L4 and PSB@2GeV in all injectors

• Possible to produce a large range of emittances, down to 1 mum if needed