draft text amendment - city of evanston

Plan Commission

831 Emerson Street CASE # 15PLND-0092

Planned Development, Special Use for Convenience Store and

Zoning Ordinance Map Amendment From C1 and R5 to C1a

Part 2 Environmental and Asbestos Reports

831 Emerson Street Planned Development

Environmental Assessment and Asbestos Report

Apex Companies, LLC - apexcos.com

300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 630 - Chicago, Illinois 60606 -T 847.956.8589 x3205 - F 847.956.8619

1701 East Woodfield Road, Suite 333, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 - T 847.956.8589 - F 847.956.8619

Phase II Limited Subsurface Investigation (LSI)

Commercial Property 815-831 Emerson Street

Evanston, Cook County, Illinois

October 12, 2015

Prepared for:

CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC

191 Waukegan Road, Suite 202 Northfield, Illinois 60093

Apex Project No. 3101004

Proprietary, Privileged and Confidential – Contains Commercial or Financial Information the Disclosure of Which Would Cause CompetitiveHarm to the Persons and Businesses Identified Herein

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ I 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives and Scope of Work ............................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Site Description ...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Site Activities/History .............................................................................................................................. 2 2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION ........................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Soil Sampling and Analytical Program ................................................................................................... 4

2.1.1 Soil Sampling .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.2 Soil Analytical Program ............................................................................................................... 4

2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analytical Program .................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 Temporary Monitoring Wells ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2.2 Groundwater Analysis ................................................................................................................. 4

3.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 5 3.1 Soil Conditions ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Groundwater Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Local Groundwater Ordinance ............................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Surface Water ......................................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 RESULTS OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 6 4.1 Results of Soil Analysis .................................................................................................................. 6 4.2 Results of Groundwater Analysis ........................................................................................................... 6 5.0 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES DETERMINATION ...................................................................................... 7

5.1 Chemical Migration Analysis: Transport in Groundwater .............................................................. 7 5.2 Construction Worker Inhalation Exceedance ................................................................................. 7

6.0 SITE MITIGATION/REMEDIATION ....................................................................................................... 8 6.1 Soil and Groundwater Cleanup ............................................................................................................. 8 6.2 Unground Storage Tank Removal ......................................................................................................... 8 7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................ 9 7.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 9 7.4 Limitations .............................................................................................................................................. 9


FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Sample Locations Figure 4 Estimated Area of Impacted Soil TABLES Table 1 Summary of Soil Data Table 2 Summary of Groundwater Data APPENDICIES Appendix A Plat of Survey & Legal Description Appendix B Site Photographs Appendix C Summary of Field Protocols Appendix D Laboratory Report Appendix E Boring Logs Appendix F City of Evanston Ordinance No. 98062401 Appendix G Contaminant Migration (Tier 2) Calculation Appendix H Worker Notification Statement


Phase II LSI October 12, 2015 815-831 Emerson Street, Evanston, Cook County, Illinois Page i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC (Focus) retained Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) to perform a Phase II Limited Subsurface Investigation (LSI) of the commercial property at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Cook County, Illinois (Site). The Site consists of an approximately 1-acre of land, improved with an approximately 20,747 square foot (SF) two-story in-line shopping center.

The Site is located in a commercial and residential area in Evanston. The Site is currently operating as a dry cleaning facility (Lake City Cleaners) and a 7-Eleven convenience store on the Ground Floor as well as vacant tenant space. The Evanston Boxing Club operates in the Second Floor of the Site building. The on-site dry cleaner has been operating since around 1920 and occupies 13,900 SF of the Site building.

A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Apex and dated May 26, 2015, identified the following Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the Site:

1. According to a previous environmental investigation provided by the Site owner, one 2,000-gallon gasoline, three 1,000-gallon cleaning solvent (soap rinsate), and one 1,500-gallon mineral spirits underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed in 1999. Two additional USTs (8,000-gallon heating oil and 400-gallon mineral spirits) were reportedly abandoned-in-place (8,000-gallon heating oil and 400-gallon mineral spirits USTs) due to their location relative to the building foundations. The sandy clay material under the removed USTs was reportedly petroleum stained with mild hydrocarbon odors. The perched water within the excavation reportedly displayed a hydrocarbon sheen. During the removal activities, the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) that was overseeing the removal advised Perfecto Cleaners (predecessor to Lake City Cleaners) to obtain two separate leaking UST (LUST) numbers from the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA). Perfecto Cleaners obtained a LUST Incident No. 991252 for the suspected cleaning solvent and mineral spirit release and LUST Incident No. 991270 for the unleaded gasoline release.

2. Several soil borings and eight groundwater monitoring wells were advanced in response to the LUST incidents. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BETX) constituents. BETX was detected below the most restrictive Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO) Tier I Soil Remediation Objectives (SROs) in the soil samples and below the most restrictive IEPA TACO Tier I Groundwater Remediation Objectives (GROs) in the groundwater samples. The unleaded gasoline LUST received closure via a No Further Remediation (NFR) Letter on August 16, 2002.

3. Additionally, the Site has been an active dry cleaning facility since the late 1920s. Historic soil and groundwater investigations reveal residual soil contamination with Stoddard Solvents and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) underneath the footprint of the Site building. While the Site has obtained regulatory closure for the dry cleaning contaminants of concern (COCs), there are still institutional controls and engineered controls that will be voided if the existed Site building is razed.

Apex developed a site-specific sampling plan to broadly assess environmental conditions at the Site. This work included drilling soil borings and installing temporary monitoring wells to collect soil and groundwater samples for analysis.


Phase II LSI October 12, 2014 BSRO PN 101397 Page ii

A soil sample collected from beneath the dry cleaner machine room on the north side of the building had detected concentrations of naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in exceedance of the Tier 1 SROs for Construction Worker inhalation. A groundwater sample collected from the same location had a detection of vinyl chloride at a concentration that exceeded the Class I GRO.

In addition to the Tier 1 exceedances, soil samples from the soil borings advanced in the vicinity of the two abandoned USTs had strong odors and elevated PID readings. However, these same soil samples did not have detections of the reported COCs in excess of the Tier 1 SROs.

Plans are being made to redevelop the Site with a multi-storied residential building with a basement and underground parking. As part of the proposed development, soil and groundwater from beneath the proposed building footprint will require removal. Soil removed from beneath the dry cleaner machine room will require management as Non-hazardous Special Waste at a Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D landfill.

It is Apex’s opinion that with a construction worker notification for the Site, and with the continuing prohibition of groundwater use in accordance with the City of Evanston’s groundwater ordinance, the Site can be used for residential, commercial or industrial development.

If the Site is enrolled into the IEPA’s Site Remediation Program in pursuit of a new NFR closure, one of the stipulations of closure may be that the proposed building does not have sumps or protrusions in the basement floor or basement walls that could potentially allow vapor intrusion of volatile compounds into the building.


Phase II LSI October 12, 2015 831-815 Emerson Street, Evanston, Illinois Page 1

1.0 INTRODUCTION

CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC (Focus) retained Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) to perform a Phase II Limited Subsurface Investigation (LSI) of the commercial property at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Cook County, Illinois (Site). The Site consists of an approximately 1-acre of land, improved with an approximately 20,747 square foot (SF) two-story in-line shopping center.


A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Apex and dated May 26, 2015, identified the following Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the Site:

1. According to a previous environmental investigation provided by the Site owner, one 2,000-gallon gasoline, three 1,000-gallon cleaning solvent (soap rinsate), and one 1,500-gallon mineral spirits underground storage tanks (USTs) were removed in 1999. Two additional USTs (8,000-gallon heating oil and 400-gallon mineral spirits) were reportedly abandoned-in-place (8,000-gallon heating oil and 400-gallon mineral spirits USTs) due to their location relative to the building foundations. The sandy clay material under the removed USTs was reportedly petroleum stained with mild hydrocarbon odors. The perched water within the excavation reportedly displayed a hydrocarbon sheen. During the removal activities, the Office of the State Fire Marshal (OSFM) that was overseeing the removal advised Perfecto Cleaners (predecessor to Lake City Cleaners) to obtain two separate leaking UST (LUST) numbers from the Illinois Emergency Management Agency (IEMA). Perfecto Cleaners obtained a LUST Incident No. 991252 for the suspected cleaning solvent and mineral spirit release and LUST Incident No. 991270 for the unleaded gasoline release.

2. Several soil borings and eight groundwater monitoring wells were advanced in response to the LUST incidents. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BETX) constituents. BETX was detected below the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) Tiered Approach to Corrective Action Objectives (TACO)1 Tier I Soil Remediation Objectives (SROs) in the soil samples and below the most restrictive IEPA TACO Tier I Groundwater Remediation Objectives (GROs) in the groundwater samples. The unleaded gasoline LUST Incident No. 991270 received closure via a No Further Remediation (NFR) Letter on August 16, 2002.

3. Additionally, the Site has been an active dry cleaning facility since the late 1920s. Historic soil and groundwater investigations reveal residual soil contamination with Stoddard Solvents and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) underneath the footprint of the Site building. During investigations to close the dry cleaner release, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was detected in three soil borings beneath the Dry Cleaner Machine Room on the north side of the building. The 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene concentrations detected in the three borings (Symbiont borings GP-1, GP-3 and GP-7) exceeded the SRO for inhalation. The IEPA issued a NFR for LUST Incident No. 991252 on September 8,

1 35 Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) Part 742



2009. While the Site has obtained regulatory closure for the dry cleaning contaminants of concern (COCs), the NFR approval is contingent on a restriction that the Site remains Industrial/Commercial use. Additionally, the NFR closure stipulates that a engineered barrier (concrete floor slab) must remain over the 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene contaminated soils.

Given Focus’ proposed redevelopment plans for the Site, the Site will require re-enrollment into the IEPA’s Site Remediation Program (SRP) to maintain NFR closure status and to allow for residential use of the Site. The closure will also likely require additional institutional controls.

1.1 Objectives and Scope of Work

The objective of the environmental investigation was to assess current subsurface environmental conditions and the potential development costs associated with the environmental conditions at the Site. To meet this objective, Apex performed soil and groundwater sampling from nine soil borings and eight temporary groundwater monitoring wells. The soil samples were analyzed for VOCs, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCS) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals and the groundwater samples for VOCs and SVOCs.

Subsurface exploration activities are described in the Section 2.0; soil and groundwater conditions are described in Section 3.0; the results of soil analysis are described in Section 4.0; remediation objectives determination is described in Section 5.0; and site mitigation is described in Section 6.0.

1.2 Site Description

The Site currently is a multi-tenant commercial building located at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Cook County, Illinois. The Site is located in a commercial and residential area in Evanston. The Site consists of an approximately 1-acre of land, improved with an approximately 20,747 SF two-story in-line shopping center. The Site is currently operating as a dry cleaning facility on the main level, a 7-Eleven convenience store also on the main level as well as vacant tenant space. The Evanston Boxing Club operates in the second story of the Site building. The on-site dry cleaner has been operating since around 1920. A Site Location Map is included as Figure 1 and a Site Plan is included as Figure 2.

The Site consists of the following Parcel Identification Numbers and associated addresses:

TAX PARCEL NUMBERS: COMMON ADDRESSES:

11-18-109-043-0000 829 EMERSON ST

11-18-109-018-0000 823 EMERSON ST

11-18-109-019-0000 821 EMERSON ST

11-18-109-020-0000 817 EMERSON ST

11-18-109-052-0000 815 EMERSON ST

11-18-109-053-0000 815 GARNETT PL

1.3 Site Activities/History

The Site as depicted on a Sanborn Fire Insurance Map from 1899 show that the site was developed with several residential structures at that time. The Site appears to have remained unchanged until the 1930s



when a Perfecto Cleaners appears on-site alongside the residential structures. In the 1970s the residential structures are gone and the expansion of the Perfecto cleaners building is shown to the east matching the current footprint of the existing structure. Photographs of the Site are included in Appendix B.



2.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION

Apex collected soil samples from nine borings and groundwater samples from eight temporary groundwater monitoring wells. The soil boring and monitoring well sample locations are shown in Figure 3. Apex’s field protocols are described in Appendix C.

2.1 Soil Sampling and Analytical Program

2.1.1 Soil Sampling

Apex used a truck-mounted hydraulic probe (Geoprobe®) rig to collect soil samples from the seven exterior borings (SB-100 through SB-105 & SB-108). Two additional borings (SB-106 & SB-107) were advanced through the interior building floor slab and manually sampled using a Geoprobe® sampler. The borings were advanced to a depth of 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), with the exception of SB-100, which was terminated at 15 feet bgs. The locations of the nine borings are illustrated, along with the historical sampling points, on Figure 3.

2.1.2 Soil Analytical Program

A total of nine soil samples, one from each soil boring, were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Methods 5035/8260B and for SVOCs by EPA Method 8270C. Four soil samples collected from soil borings SB-100, SB-101, SB-104 and SB-106 were analyzed for RCRA total metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium and silver) by EPA Method 6010B.

Sample selection was based upon the results of field screening where the samples exhibiting indications of a potential chemical release (staining, odors, volatile emissions measured using a photoionization detector [PID]), if encountered, were selected for analysis. The soil analyses were performed by STAT Analysis Corporation, a National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) certified laboratory for the applied test methods. A Copy of the laboratory report is included as Appendix D. The results of soil analyses are summarized in Table 1 and discussed in Section 4.1.

2.2 Groundwater Sampling and Analytical Program

2.2.1 Temporary Groundwater Monitoring Wells

Apex installed eight temporary groundwater monitoring wells (MW-101 through MW-108) in the corresponding soil borings. The temporary monitoring wells were constructed by installing 1-inch diameter PVC well screen into the open boreholes. Groundwater “grab” samples were collected using a low-flow pump. Following collection of water samples, the casing for the temporary wells was removed and the borehole was filled with bentonite and completed at ground surface using cement grout or asphalt repair in an effort to match the surrounding hard surface. Lithologic logs and well construction diagrams for the temporary wells are included in Appendix E.

2.2.2 Groundwater Analysis

A total of eight groundwater samples (one sample from each of the temporary groundwater monitoring wells) were analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 8260 and for SVOCs, including polynuclear aromatics (PNAs) by EPA Method 8270. The results of the groundwater analysis are summarized in Table 2 and are discussed in Section 4.2. The groundwater analysis was also performed by STAT Analysis Corporation.



3.0 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

3.1 Soil Conditions

Apex encountered the following generalized lithologic sequence during the investigation at the Site:

Fill material consisting of black and brown sand with varying amounts of gravel was encountered below asphalt pavement in the exterior borings to a depth of approximately 4 feet bgs. The two borings advance inside the building did not encounter fill soils beneath the concrete floor slab.

Silty sand was encountered below the fill material from depths ranging from 10 to 12 feet bgs.

The sand was underlain by gray silty clay which extended to 15 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored.

Apex screened soil samples in the field for chemical odors, evidence of staining and volatile emissions using a PID. Field screening detected odors and PID measurements ranging from 18 to 1,591 parts per million vapor (ppmv) in borings SB-103, SB-106 and SB-107collected on the north side of the building. Soil Boring SB-107 had the maximum PID detection of 1,591 ppmv in soil immediately above the water table at approximately 4.5 feet bgs. The results of soil screening are shown in the soil boring logs included in Appendix E.

3.2 Groundwater Conditions

Groundwater beneath the Site occurs in an unconfined zone where groundwater was encountered at depths between 4 and 8 feet bgs. Based upon historical data, groundwater at the Site is flowing south-southwest at a gradient of approximately 0.02 foot/foot (lateral/vertical).

3.3 Local Groundwater Ordinance

The City of Evanston Ordinance No. 98062401 restricts construction of private wells and prohibits the use of water wells for domestic, commercial, industrial purposes. The Illinois EPA has approved the City of Evanston’s groundwater ordinance as an institutional control. A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Illinois EPA and the City of Evanston Ordinance No. 98062401 is included as Appendix F.

3.4 Surface Water

The closest surface water body is Lake Michigan located approximately 3,200 feet to the east of the Site as shown in Figure 1.



4.0 RESULTS OF SOIL AND GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS

The results of the soil analysis were compared to SROs for residential use, those established for the protection of construction workers, and the soil leaching component to Class I (potable) Groundwater cited in Title 35 IAC 742. The PNAs and total metals data was also compared to documented background concentrations for the metropolitan areas also cited in Title 35 IAC 742. The results of groundwater analysis were compared to Class I GROs also cited in Title 35 IAC 742. Table 1 provides a summary of the soil analysis and Table 2 provides the groundwater data summary relative to the GROs.

4.1 Results of Soil Analysis

Apex collected nine soil samples that were analyzed for VOCs and SVOCs. Four of the nine soil samples (SB-100, SB-101, SB-104 and SB-106) were also analyzed for RCRA (total) metals, including barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium and silver. Copies of the laboratory reports are included in Appendix D. Based on the comparison of the laboratory results and the SROs, the soil samples did not detect the elevated analytes in exceedance of both the SROs and background concentrations, with the exception of Sample SB-107. A detection of naphthalene at a concentration of 2.7 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in Sample SB-107 exceeds the Construction Worker Inhalation SRO of 1.8 mg/kg. Also in Sample SB-107, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was detected at a concentration of 51 mg/kg. TACO does not have SROs for 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene; however, the IEPA has established a Non-TACO Construction Worker SRO for the inhalation of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene of 8.9 mg/kg. Therefore, we note this as an exceedance and future regulatory closure will require this to be addressed. It should be noted that the laboratory analyst reported what appeared as mineral spirits or Stoddard solvent constituents were observed on of the chromatographs for some of the soil samples. Given that some of the components of mineral spirits and/or Stoddard solvent were not a laboratory reported analyte, this might explain the lack of detections in the soil samples with odors and elevated PID readings. This is significant in that the majority of registered clean fill facilities (35 IAC 1100) do not accept soils with elevated PID readings and soil exhibiting odors and/or PID reading may not be accepted as clean fill.

4.2 Results of Groundwater Analysis

The groundwater data was compared to Class I GROs (regulatory limits) cited in Title 35 IAC 742. The results of groundwater analysis are discussed below. Groundwater data is summarized in Table 2. Copies of the laboratory reports are included in Appendix D.

The analysis of the eight groundwater samples did not result in detected VOCs or SVOCs above the laboratory’s reportable limits, with the exception of vinyl chloride detected in Sample MW-107. Monitoring well MW-107 was located within the Dry Cleaning Machine Room on the north side of the building. Vinyl chloride was detected in MW-107 at a concentration of 0.0074 milligrams per liter (mg/L). The Class I GRO for vinyl chloride is 0.002 mg/L. The vinyl chloride exceedance is further evaluated with a Tier 2 calculation in Section 5.1.



5.0 REMEDIAL OBJECTIVES DETERMINATION

Apex proposes to address the soil inhalation and groundwater ingestion exceedances as described below.

5.1 Chemical Migration Analysis: Transport in Groundwater

The groundwater analysis detected vinyl chloride at a concentration in excess of Tier 1 GRO for Class I groundwater. To evaluate the potential for off-site migration of vinyl chloride in groundwater, Apex performed contaminant migration analysis using Equation R-26 from 35 IAC 742.810. The results of the R-26 calculation is summarized below.

The R-26 calculations predicts that natural attenuation processes would reduce the vinyl chloride concentration to less than Class I GRO at the downgradient (southern) property line. Copies of the R-26 calculations are included in Appendix G.

The results of the Tier 2 analysis for chemical migration in groundwater (Equation R-26) where vinyl chloride exceeded the Class I GRO is summarized below.

Compound Highest Detection

Limit (mg/L)

Concentrations (mg/L)

Calculated Concentration at

Downgradient Property Line (Equation R-26)

GRO Class I Groundwater

vinyl chloride 0.0074 0.0003 0.002

The R-26 calculations predict that natural attenuation processes would reduce vinyl chloride concentrations to less than the Class I GRO at the downgradient (southern) property line.

5.2 Construction Worker Inhalation Exceedance

Soil sampling/analysis at the Site detected naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in soil sample SB-107 at concentrations in excess of the Construction Worker Inhalation SROs. The exceedances are summarized below.

Compound

mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram

Highest Concentration SROs

Construction Worker Inhalation

naphthalene 2.7 1.8

1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 51 8.9

In order to address the inhalation exceedances a notification statement has been developed to inform workers performing invasive earthwork activities at the Site that precautions should be taken to avoid potential exposure at the Site. Workers most likely to be exposed to naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are those performing tasks with significant contact with the soil/fill, A copy of the Worker Notification is enclosed in Appendix H.



6.0 SITE MITIGATION/REMEDIATION

Analysis of soil samples collected from the dry cleaning machine room detected naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene at concentrations in excess of the Tier 1 SROs for Construction Worker Inhalation. In the same location vinyl chloride was detected in a groundwater sample in exceedance of the Class I GRO.

The client-provided, preliminary proposed redevelopment plans for the Site which includes the excavation of an underground parking garage which will include the entire extent of the Site (~1 acre). During the development of the Site the subsurface impacts beneath the Dry Cleaning Machine Room and adjacent to the abandoned USTs will need to be appropriately managed. Additionally, the two USTs that were abandoned in-place will require removal.

6.1 Soil and Groundwater Cleanup

During excavation of the sub-grade improvements, soil mitigation should included removal of chemically impacted soil (Special Waste) for off-site disposal as a regulated waste at a RCRA Subtitle D Landfill. Assuming an excavation depth of 11 feet bgs for the basement, the estimated volume of impacted soil requiring management as Special Waste is 1,425 cubic yards or approximately 2,139 tons. Figure 4 shows the estimated area of impacted soil. A disposal permit from a RCRA Subtitle D Landfill for the Special Waste soil will be required in order to dispose of these spoils.

During the soil remediation, a tanker truck (or other means) should be utilized to remove and dispose of the impacted groundwater within the remedial excavations. The waste water recovered from the remediation must be properly managed under manifest control.

6.2 Unground Storage Tank Removal

Once the existing building has been razed, the two abandoned USTs will require removal. A registered Tank Removal Contractor with the OSFM will need to be hired to remove the tanks and a removal permit from the OSFM will be required. During the tank removal a qualified environmental consultant should be retained to document the UST removal operations for inclusion in Focus’ petition for regulatory closure to IEPA SRP.



7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

7.1 Summary

Focus retained Apex to perform a Phase II LSI of the commercial property at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Cook County, Illinois. The Site consists of an approximately 1-acre of land, improved with an approximately 20,747 SF two-story in-line shopping center.


A Phase I ESA prepared by Apex and dated May 26, 2015, identified the following Recognized RECs associated with the Site:

1. According to a previous environmental investigation provided by the Site owner, one 2,000-gallon gasoline, three 1,000-gallon cleaning solvent (soap rinsate) and one 1,500-gallon mineral spirits USTs were removed in 1999. Two additional USTs (8,000-gallon heating oil and 400-gallon mineral spirits) were reportedly abandoned-in-place due to their location relative to the building foundations. During the removal activities, the OSFM that was overseeing the removal/abandonment advised Perfecto Cleaners to obtain two separate LUST numbers from the IEMA. Perfecto Cleaners obtained a LUST Incident No. for the suspected cleaning solvent and mineral spirit (991252) leak and another LUST Incident No. for the unleaded gasoline leak (991270).

2. Several soil borings and eight groundwater monitoring wells were advanced in response to the LUST incidents. Soil and groundwater samples were analyzed for BETX constituents. BETX was detected below the most restrictive IEPA TACO Tier I SROs in the soil samples and below the most restrictive IEPA TACO Tier I GROs in the groundwater samples. The unleaded gasoline LUST received closure via a NFR Letter on August 16, 2002.

3. Additionally, the Site has been an active dry cleaning facility since the late 1920s. Historic soil and groundwater investigations reveal residual soil contamination with Stoddard Solvents and VOCs underneath the footprint of the Site building. The IEPA issued a NFR for LUST Incident No. 991252 on September 8, 2009. While the Site has obtained regulatory closure for the dry cleaning COCs, there are institutional controls and engineered controls that will be voided if the existed Site building is razed.

Apex developed a site-specific sampling plan to broadly assess environmental conditions at the Site. This work included drilling soil borings and installing temporary monitoring wells to collect soil and groundwater samples for analysis.

Soil Sample collected from beneath the dry cleaner machine room on the north side of the building had detected concentrations of naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in exceedance of the Tier 1 SROs for Construction Worker inhalation. A groundwater sample collected from the same location had a detection of vinyl chloride at a concentration that exceeded the Class I GRO. In addition to the Tier 1 exceedances, soil samples from the soil borings advanced in the vicinity of the two abandoned USTs had strong odors



and elevated PID readings. However, these same soil samples did not have detections of the reported COCs in excess of the Tier 1 SROs. The contaminants and their locations identified in Apex’s investigation were consistent with the historical subsurface data used to obtain the NFR closure for the Site.

Plans are being made to redevelop the Site with a multi-storied residential building with underground parking. As part of the proposed development, soil and groundwater from beneath the proposed footprint of the building will require removal. Soil from beneath the dry cleaner machine room and soil in the vicinity of the two abandoned USTs will require management as Non-hazardous Special Waste at a RCRA Subtitle D landfill.

In addition to the soil and groundwater remediation, the two USTs abandoned in-place will require removal by a registered Tank Removal Contractor. During the tank removal and soil remediation, a qualified environmental consultant should be retained to document the operations.

It is Apex’s opinion that with a construction worker notification for the Site and with the continuing prohibition of groundwater use in accordance with the City of Evanston’s groundwater ordinance, the Site can be used for residential, commercial or industrial development.

If the Site is enrolled into the IEPA’s Site Remediation Program in pursuit of a new NFR closure, one of the stipulations of closure may be that the proposed building does not have sumps or protrusions in the basement floor or basement walls that could potentially allow vapor intrusion of volatile compounds into the building.

7.4 Limitations

The conclusions presented here are based on site observations and analytical data. The opinions presented here are based on our understanding of existing environmental laws and regulations. No representation is made or intended relative to future environmental laws, regulations, or objectives. This report represents our professional judgment and opinion. No warranty is expressed or implied.


FIGURES


SITE LOCATION

ILLINOIS

QUADRANGLE LOCATION(SOURCE OF MAP IS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAP, EVANSTON (1993), ILLINOIS)

QUADRANGLE LOCATION


EMERSON STREET

BE

NS

ON

AV

EN

UE

MA

PL

EA

VE

NU

E

SH

ER

MA

NA

VE

NU

E


TABLES


Table 1Soil Analytical Summary 815-831 Emerson Street

Evanston, Illinois

15090765-001 15090765-002 15090765-003 15090765-004 15090765-005 15090765-006 15090765-007 15090765-008 15090765-009SB-100 SB-101 SB-102 SB-103 SB-104 SB-105 SB-106 SB-107 SB-108

09/24/2015 08:20 09/24/2015 08:45 09/24/2015 10:40 09/24/2015 10:15 09/24/2015 09:30 09/24/2015 09:00 09/24/2015 12:15 09/24/2015 12:00 09/24/2015 11:00

Analyte Ingestion Inhalation Class I Class IIVOCs

1,1,1-Trichloroethane NE 1,200 2 9.6 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00301,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NE NE NE NE NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00301,1,2-Trichloroethane 310 1,800 0.02 0.3 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00301,1-Dichloroethane 7,800 1,300 / 130* 23 110 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00301,1-Dichloroethene 3,900 290 / 3.0* 0.06 0.3 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00301,2,4-Trimethylbenzene** NE 87/8.9 NE NE NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 0.011 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 51 < 0.00301,2-Dichloroethane 7 0.4 0.02 0.1 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00301,2-Dichloropropane 9 15 / 0.50* 0.03 0.15 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.00302-Butanone NE NE NE NE NE < 0.045 < 0.042 < 0.052 < 0.049 < 0.048 < 0.045 < 0.038 < 3.0 < 0.0452-Hexanone NE NE NE NE NE < 0.012 < 0.011 < 0.014 < 0.013 < 0.013 < 0.012 < 0.010 < 0.79 < 0.0124-Methyl-2-pentanone NE NE NE NE NE < 0.012 < 0.011 < 0.014 < 0.013 < 0.013 < 0.012 < 0.010 < 0.79 < 0.012Acetone 70,000 100,000 25 25 NE < 0.045 < 0.042 < 0.052 0.086 < 0.048 < 0.045 < 0.038 < 3.0 < 0.045Benzene 12 0.8 0.03 0.17 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Bromodichloromethane 10 3,000 0.6 0.6 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Bromoform 81 53 0.8 0.8 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Bromomethane 110 10 / 3.9* 0.2 1.2 NE < 0.0060 < 0.0056 < 0.0069 < 0.0065 < 0.0064 < 0.0060 < 0.0050 < 0.40 < 0.0060Carbon disulfide 7,800 720 32 160 NE < 0.030 < 0.028 < 0.035 < 0.033 < 0.032 < 0.030 < 0.025 < 2.0 < 0.030Carbon tetrachloride 5 0.3 0.07 0.33 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Chlorobenzene 1,600 130 / 1.3* 1 6.5 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Chloroethane NE NE NE NE NE < 0.0060 < 0.0056 < 0.0069 < 0.0065 < 0.0064 < 0.0060 < 0.0050 < 0.40 < 0.0060Chloroform 100 0.3 0.6 2.9 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Chloromethane NE NE NE NE NE < 0.0060 < 0.0056 < 0.0069 < 0.0065 < 0.0064 < 0.0060 < 0.0050 < 0.40 < 0.0060cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 780 1,200 0.4 1.1 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 6.4 1.1 / 0.39* 0.004 0.02 NE < 0.0012 < 0.0011 < 0.0014 < 0.0013 < 0.0013 < 0.0012 < 0.0010 < 0.079 < 0.0012Dibromochloromethane 1,600 1,300 0.4 0.4 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Ethylbenzene 7,800 400 / 58* 13 19 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 0.35 < 0.0030Methyl tert-butyl ether 780 8,800 / 140* 0.32 0.32 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Methylene chloride 85 13 0.02 0.2 NE < 0.0060 < 0.0056 < 0.0069 < 0.0065 < 0.0064 < 0.0060 < 0.0050 < 0.40 < 0.0060Styrene 16,000 1,500 / 430* 4 18 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Tetrachloroethene 12 11 0.06 0.3 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Toluene 16,000 650 / 42* 12 29 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 1,600 3,100 0.7 3.4 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 6.4 1.1 / 0.39* 0.004 0.02 NE < 0.0012 < 0.0011 < 0.0014 < 0.0013 < 0.0013 < 0.0012 < 0.0010 < 0.079 < 0.0012Trichloroethene 58 5 0.06 0.3 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Vinyl chloride 0.46 0.28 0.01 0.07 NE < 0.0030 < 0.0028 < 0.0035 < 0.0033 < 0.0032 < 0.0030 < 0.0025 < 0.20 < 0.0030Xylenes, Total 16,000 320 / 5.6* 150 150 NE < 0.0090 < 0.0084 < 0.010 < 0.0098 < 0.0096 < 0.0090 < 0.0076 < 0.59 < 0.0091

Laboratory ID : Client Sample ID :

Date Collected :

Route Specific Values for SoilSoil Component of

Groundwater Ingestion Background

Page 1



Evanston, Illinois


09/24/2015 08:20 09/24/2015 08:45 09/24/2015 10:40 09/24/2015 10:15 09/24/2015 09:30 09/24/2015 09:00 09/24/2015 12:15 09/24/2015 12:00 09/24/2015 11:00

Analyte Ingestion Inhalation Class I Class II


Date Collected :



PNAsAcenaphthene 4,700 NE 570 2,900 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.040 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Acenaphthylene NE NE NE NE < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Anthracene 23,000 NE 12,000 59,000 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.046 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Benz(a)anthracene 0.9 NE 2 8 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.17 < 0.038 0.14 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Benzo(a)pyrene 0.09 NE 8 82 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.19 < 0.038 0.16 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.9 NE 5 25 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.18 < 0.038 0.16 < 0.038 < 0.038 0.039 < 0.038Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE NE NE < 0.038 < 0.040 0.13 < 0.038 0.12 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Benzo(k)fluoranthene 9 NE 49 250 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.16 < 0.038 0.14 < 0.038 < 0.038 0.038 < 0.038Chrysene 88 NE 160 800 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.20 < 0.038 0.17 < 0.038 < 0.038 0.051 < 0.038Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.09 NE 2 7.6 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.058 < 0.038 0.056 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Fluoranthene 3,100 NE 4,300 21,000 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.45 < 0.038 0.33 < 0.038 < 0.038 0.083 < 0.038Fluorene 3,100 NE 560 2,800 < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.9 NE 14 69 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.11 < 0.038 0.11 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Naphthalene 1,600 170 / 1.8* 12 18 < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 2.7 < 0.038Phenanthrene NE NE NE NE < 0.038 < 0.040 0.27 < 0.038 0.087 < 0.038 < 0.038 0.039 < 0.038Pyrene 2,300 NE 4,200 21,000 < 0.038 < 0.040 0.42 < 0.038 0.35 < 0.038 < 0.038 0.082 < 0.038

Page 2



Evanston, Illinois


09/24/2015 08:20 09/24/2015 08:45 09/24/2015 10:40 09/24/2015 10:15 09/24/2015 09:30 09/24/2015 09:00 09/24/2015 12:15 09/24/2015 12:00 09/24/2015 11:00



Date Collected :



SVOCsAniline NE NE NE NE NE < 0.38 < 0.40 < 0.39 < 0.39 < 0.38 < 0.39 < 0.38 < 0.39 < 0.38Benzidine NE NE NE NE NE < 0.38 < 0.40 < 0.39 < 0.38 < 0.37 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.38Benzoic acid 310,000 NE 400 400 NE < 0.95 < 1.0 < 0.98 < 0.96 < 0.94 < 0.97 < 0.94 < 0.96 < 0.96Benzyl alcohol NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 0.6 0.2 0.0004 0.0004 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 46 31,000 3,600 31,000 NE < 0.95 < 1.0 < 0.98 < 0.96 < 0.94 < 0.97 < 0.94 3.9 < 0.964-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Butyl benzyl phthalate 16,000 930 930 930 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Carbazole 32 NE 0.6 2.8 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204-Chloroaniline 310 NE 0.7 0.7 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204-Chloro-3-methylphenol NE NE NE NE NE < 0.38 < 0.40 < 0.39 < 0.38 < 0.37 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.382-Chloronaphthalene NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202-Chlorophenol 390 53,000 4 4 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Dibenzofuran NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.201,2-Dichlorobenzene 7,000 560 / 310* 17 43 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.201,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.201,4-Dichlorobenzene NE 11,000 / 340* 2 11 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.203,3´-Dichlorobenzidine 1 NE 0.007 0.033 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202,4-Dichlorophenol 230 NE 1 1 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Diethyl phthalate 63,000 2,000 470 470 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202,4-Dimethylphenol 1,600 NE 9 9 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Dimethyl phthalate NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NE NE NE NE NE < 0.38 < 0.40 < 0.39 < 0.38 < 0.37 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.382,4-Dinitrophenol 160 NE 0.2 0.2 NE < 0.95 < 1.0 < 0.98 < 0.96 < 0.94 < 0.97 < 0.94 < 0.96 < 0.962,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.9 NE 0.0008 0.0008 NE < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.0382,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.9 NE 0.0007 0.0007 NE < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038Di-n-butyl phthalate 7,800 2,300 2,300 2,300 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Di-n-octyl phthalate 1,600 10,000 10,000 10,000 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Hexachlorobenzene 0.4 1 2 11 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Hexachlorobutadiene NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 550 10 / 1.1* 400 2,200 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Hexachloroethane 78 NE 0.5 2.6 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Isophorone 15,600 4,600 8 8 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202-Methylnaphthalene NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 0.82 < 0.202-Methylphenol 3,900 NE 15 15 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204-Methylphenol NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202-Nitroaniline NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.203-Nitroaniline NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204-Nitroaniline NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202-Nitrophenol NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.204-Nitrophenol NE NE NE NE NE < 0.38 < 0.40 < 0.39 < 0.38 < 0.37 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.38 < 0.38Nitrobenzene 39 92/9.4* 0.1 0.1 NE < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 0.09 NE 0.00005 0.00005 NE < 0.038 < 0.040 < 0.039 < 0.038 < 0.037 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038 < 0.038N-Nitrosodimethylamine NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 130 NE 1 5.6 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202, 2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) NE NE NE NE NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Pentachlorophenol 3 NE 0.03 0.14 NE < 0.077 < 0.081 < 0.079 < 0.078 < 0.076 < 0.078 < 0.076 < 0.077 < 0.077Phenol 23,000 NE 100 100 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20Pyridine NE NE NE NE NE < 0.77 < 0.81 < 0.79 < 0.78 < 0.76 < 0.78 < 0.76 < 0.77 < 0.771,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 780 3,200 / 920* 5 53 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202,4,5-Trichlorophenol 7,800 NE 270 1,400 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.202,4,6-Trichlorophenol 58 200 0.2 0.77 NE < 0.19 < 0.21 < 0.20 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.19 < 0.20 < 0.20

Page 3



Evanston, Illinois


09/24/2015 08:20 09/24/2015 08:45 09/24/2015 10:40 09/24/2015 10:15 09/24/2015 09:30 09/24/2015 09:00 09/24/2015 12:15 09/24/2015 12:00 09/24/2015 11:00



Date Collected :



MetalsArsenic 13.0/11.3 750 NE NE 5.8 6.1 NT 7.2 NT 6.8 NT NT NTBarium 5,500 690,000 NE NE 28 76 NT 48 NT 18 NT NT NTCadmium 78 1,800 NE NE < 0.56 < 0.61 NT < 0.55 NT < 0.58 NT NT NTChromium 230 270 NE NE 12 21 NT 14 NT 13 NT NT NTLead 400 NE NE NE 13 57 NT 100 NT 8.8 NT NT NTMercury 23 10 / 0.1* NE NE < 0.021 0.063 NT 0.069 NT 0.046 NT NT NTSelenium 390 NE NE NE 1.8 2.7 NT 2.0 NT 1.3 NT NT NTSilver 390 NE NE NE < 1.1 < 1.2 NT 1.2 NT < 1.2 NT NT NTnotes:* - Construction Worker Inhalation Objective from 35 IAC 742, Appendix B, Table B.

Bold concentrations indicate that the parameter was detected at a concentration in excess of the laboratory's reportable limitsHighlighted cells signify an exceedance of one or more of the SROs from 35 IAC 742Background concentrations are estiblished for metroplitan areas (35 IAC 742)**The IEPA has established Non-TACO SROs for 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene

< = not detected above the laboratories reportable limit

NE = SRO note established for this exposure routeNT = not tested for this parameter

Page 4


Table 2Groundwater Analytica Summary

815-831 Emerson StreetEvanston, Illinois15090765-010 15090765-011 15090765-012 15090765-013 15090765-014 15090765-015 15090765-016 15090765-017

MW-101 MW-102 MW-103 MW-104 MW-105 MW-106 MW-107 MW-10809/24/2015 11:15 09/24/2015 13:05 09/24/2015 13:00 09/24/2015 12:30 09/24/2015 12:45 09/24/2015 13:15 09/24/2015 13:10 09/24/2015 13:35

mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

Analyte Class I Class IIVOCs

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.2 1.0 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.005 0.05 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,1-Dichloroethane 0.7 3.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,1-Dichloroethene 0.007 0.035 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,2,4-Trimethylbenzene NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.16 < 0.00501,2-Dichloroethane 0.005 0.025 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,2-Dichloropropane 0.005 0.025 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502-Butanone NE NE < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.0202-Hexanone NE NE < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.0204-Methyl-2-pentanone NE NE < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020Acetone 6.3 6.3 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020 < 0.020Benzene 0.005 0.025 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Bromodichloromethane 0.0002 0.0002 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Bromoform 0.001 0.001 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Bromomethane 0.0098 0.049 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Carbon disulfide 0.7 3.5 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Carbon tetrachloride 0.005 0.025 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Chlorobenzene 0.1 0.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Chloroethane NE NE < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010Chloroform 0.0002 0.001 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Chloromethane NE NE < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.07 0.2 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.011 0.039 0.039cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.001 0.005 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Dibromochloromethane 0.14 0.14 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Ethylbenzene 0.7 1.0 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.021 < 0.0050Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.07 0.07 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Methylene chloride 0.005 0.05 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Styrene 0.1 0.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Tetrachloroethene 0.005 0.025 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Toluene 1.0 2.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.1 0.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.001 0.005 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Trichloroethene 0.005 0.025 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Vinyl chloride 0.002 0.01 < 0.0020 < 0.0020 < 0.0020 < 0.0020 < 0.0020 < 0.0020 0.0078 < 0.0020Xylenes, Total 10.0 10.0 < 0.015 < 0.015 < 0.015 < 0.015 < 0.015 < 0.015 < 0.015 < 0.015


Date Collected : Groundwater

Remediation Objective (GROs)

Page 1






Analyte Class I Class II




PNAsAcenaphthene 0.42 2.1 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Acenaphthylene NE NE < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Anthracene 2.1 10.5 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Benz(a)anthracene 0.00013 0.00065 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Benzo(a)pyrene 0.0002 0.002 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.00018 0.0009 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Benzo(g,h,i)perylene NE NE < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.00017 0.00085 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Chrysene 0.0015 0.0075 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.0003 0.0015 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Fluoranthene 0.28 1.4 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Fluorene 0.28 1.4 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.00043 0.00215 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010Naphthalene 0.14 0.22 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 0.0016 0.050 < 0.0010Phenanthrene NE NE < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Pyrene 0.21 1.05 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010

SVOCsAniline NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Benzidine NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Benzoic acid 28 28 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025Benzyl alcohol NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 0.01 0.01 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 0.006 0.06 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00504-Bromophenyl phenyl ether NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Butyl benzyl phthalate 1.4 7.0 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Carbazole NE NE < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.000104-Chloroaniline 0.028 0.028 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.00002 0.00002 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.000104-Chloro-3-methylphenol NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502,6-Dinitrotoluene 0.00031 0.00031 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.000102-Chloronaphthalene NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502-Chlorophenol 0.035 0.035* < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 0.0018 0.0018 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.00010 < 0.000104-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Nitrobenzene 0.0035 0.0035 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 < 0.0010Pentachlorophenol 0.001 0.005 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050 < 0.00050Dibenzofuran NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.6 1.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,3-Dichlorobenzene NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.075 0.375 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00503,3´-Dichlorobenzidine 0.02 0.1 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.0102,4-Dichlorophenol 0.021 0.021 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050

Page 2






Analyte Class I Class II




Diethyl phthalate 5.6 5.6 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502,4-Dimethylphenol 0.14 0.14 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Dimethyl phthalate NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00504,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol NE NE < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.0252,4-Dinitrophenol 0.014 0.014 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025Di-n-butyl phthalate 0.7 3.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Di-n-octyl phthalate 0.14 0.7 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Hexachlorobenzene 0.00006 0.0003 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Hexachlorobutadiene NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05 0.5 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Hexachloroethane 0.007 0.035 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Isophorone 1.4 1.4 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502-Methylnaphthalene NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 0.0055 < 0.00502-Methylphenol 0.35 0.35 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00504-Methylphenol NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502-Nitroaniline NE NE < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.0253-Nitroaniline NE NE < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.0254-Nitroaniline NE NE < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.0252-Nitrophenol NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00504-Nitrophenol NE NE < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025 < 0.025N-Nitrosodimethylamine NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 0.0032 0.016 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502, 2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Phenol 0.1 0.1 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050Pyridine NE NE < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00501,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.07 0.7 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.00502,4,5-Trichlorophenol 0.7 0.7* < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.010 < 0.0102,4,6-Trichlorophenol 0.01 0.01* < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050 < 0.0050

* - Class II objective may be higher depending on sample pH.

Bold concentrations indicate that the parameter was detected at a concentration in excess of the laboratory's reportable limits

NT = not tested for this parameter

GROs are from 35 IAC 742Highlighted cells signify an exceedance of one or more of the GROs from 35 IAC 742

NE = SRO note established for this exposure route

notes:

Page 3


Appendix A - Plat of Survey & Legal Description


Appendix B - Site Photographs


PHOTO LOG FOR DRY CLEANING PLANT AND STRIP MALL, EVANSTON, ILLINOIS

1 of 8

Photo No. 1 showing the dry cleaning Site from the southwest corner across Emerson Street.

Photo No. 2 showing the Site from the southeast corner across Emerson Street.

Photo No. 3 showing the inside of the eastern-most vacant restaurant tenant space on-site.



2 of 8

Photo No. 4 showing the observed hydraulic elevator to the east of the dry cleaning tenant, going to the second floor gym tenant.

Photo No. 5 showing the mechanical room for the elevator.

Photo No. 6 showing the inside of the dry cleaning tenant.



3 of 8

Photo No. 7 showing the historic and out of commission dry cleaning machine.

Photo No. 8 showing the historic and out of commission dry cleaning machine

Photo No. 9 showing the newer dry cleaning machines installed in 2004.



4 of 8

Photo No. 12 showing the new dry cleaning chemicals currently used in the dry cleaning tenant space.

Photo No. 10 showing the newer dry cleaning machines installed in 2004.

Photo No. 11 showing the drying area in the dry cleaning tenant space.



5 of 8

Photo No. 13 showing an observed plastic AST with the new dry cleaning chemicals used on-site.

Photo No. 14 showing the newer dry cleaning equipment used as part of the drying process.

Photo No. 15 showing drums with spent solvent with the newer dry cleaning chemicals.



6 of 8

Photo No. 16 showing a drum with dry cleaning solvent observed in the boiler room.

Photo No. 17 showing the observed pole-mounted transformer located on the north side of the Site building.

Photo No. 18 showing the observed groundwater well casing on the southwest portion of the Site building.



7 of 8

Photo No. 19 showing the observed area where the heating oil UST was reportedly abandoned in place.

Photo No. 20 showing the observed area north of the Site where the historic cleaning solvent USTs were removed.

Photo No. 20 showing another area on the north side of the Site where additional cleaning solvent USTs were reportedly removed.



8 of 8

Photo No. 20 showing the south adjoining First Bank & Trust facility addressed as 824 Emerson Street.

Photo No. 20 showing the southeast adjoining apartment buildings addressed as 1864 Emerson Street.

Photo No. 20 showing the eastern adjoining apartment building addressed as 1900 Sherman Avenue.


Appendix C - Summary of Field Protocols


SUMMARY OF FIELD PROTOCOLS PHASE II LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

815-831 EMERSON STREET EVANSTON, ILLINOIS

CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC (Focus) retained Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) to perform a Phase II Limited Subsurface Investigation of a commercial property at 815-831 Emerson Street, Evanston, Illinois (the Site). The Site consists of an approximately 1-acre of land, currently improved with an approximately 20,747 square foot (SF) two-story in-line shopping center. We understand that Focus is considering acquisition of the Site for redevelopment. Subsurface assessment included performance of a geophysical survey to clear underground utilities in the vicinity of soil borings; the collection of soil samples from nine borings and the installation/sampling of eight temporary monitoring wells. Soil Sampling To assess the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Metals a truck mounted hydraulic Geoprobe™ was used to collect soil samples from the exterior soil boring locations. Interior borings were advanced using a Hilti® electric breaker equipped with a Geoprobe® adapter and probe rods to collect soil samples. Each of the borings was advanced to a depth of 12 feet below ground surface (bgs), with the exception of SB-101 which was advanced to 15 feet bgs. Copies of the boring logs are included in Appendix E. Soil samples were collected continuously from ground surface to the bottom of each boring by pushing a 2-inch diameter by 5-foot long hollow-barreled sampler into/through the soil. Soil samples were collected in dedicated, disposable plastic liners contained in the sampler. Lithologic Description Soil samples were collected continuously from ground surface to the bottom of each boring for lithologic description and soil screening. An experienced geologist documented the subsurface conditions (soil type, photoionization detector [PID] measurements, the presence of staining, odors etc.). Our field observations and lithologic descriptions are summarized in the boring logs included in Appendix E. Sample Screening/Selection Soil samples were screened in the field for chemical odors, evidence of staining and volatile organic emissions using a PID equipped with a 10.6 eV PID lamp. The PID was calibrated using isobutylene calibration gas in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocols prior to the start of fieldwork. Soil collected from various depth intervals in each boring was broken apart, placed and sealed in plastic ‘ziploc’ bags and after a few minutes volatile emissions were measured in the headspace using the PID. Soil samples from each boring exhibiting signs of potential impacts including strong odors, elevated PID readings and/or staining were selected for chemical analysis. In the absence of such indications representative sample(s) above the water table were submitted for analysis. The results of the field screening are shown in the boring logs included in Appendix E. Soil Sample Handling Procedures Soil samples analyzed for VOCs by EPA Method 5035/8260 were collected by pushing a sampler syringe into the soil to collect an approximate 5 gram sample, the plunger was used to extrude the soil sample into clean, laboratory-supplied 40 milliliter (ml) VOA vials with sodium bisulfate or methanol preservative. The VOA was immediately capped, labeled and placed in a chilled cooler for transport to the analytical laboratory. Soil samples for additional parameters were placed in clean, 4-ounce


laboratory-supplied jars. Chain-of-custody protocols were maintained throughout the sample handing process Temporary Well Construction A temporary well was installed in eight of the nine soil boring locations. Temporary wells were constructed by lowering a clean, 5-foot long, 1-inch diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) well screen with blank riser into the water table. Filter (sand) pack was not placed in the annulus between the well screen and the borehole, due to caving conditions of native sand into the borehole. Upon completion of the groundwater sampling, the PVC well materials were removed from the ground and the ground surface was patched with Portland cement or asphalt cold patch to match the surrounding pavement. Groundwater Sampling Apex used a peristaltic pump, with dedicated tubing for water sampling. Water samples for VOC analysis were collected by filling 40-ml vials in a manner to minimize turbulence, air entrapment and overfilling. VOCs sample vials contained a hydrochloric acid preservative. The bottles were filled completely leaving a positive meniscus at the top of the vial. After capping, the vial was inverted and was tapped with a finger to check to confirm that air bubbles were not present. SVOCs groundwater samples were placed in laboratory supplied one liter amber jars. The sample vials and amber jars were then labeled and placed in a chilled cooler for transport to the analytical laboratory. Chain of custody documentation was maintained throughout the sample handling process.


Appendix D - Laboratory Report


1 of 61


October 07, 2015Date:STAT Analysis Corporation

Project: 3101004, Focus Evanston, 815-831 Emerson St.Client: Apex Companies, LLC

Work Order: 15090765Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date Received

Revision 1

15090765-001A SB-100 9/24/2015 8:20:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-001B SB-100 9/24/2015 8:20:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-002A SB-101 9/24/2015 8:45:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-002B SB-101 9/24/2015 8:45:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-003A SB-102 9/24/2015 10:40:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-003B SB-102 9/24/2015 10:40:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-004A SB-103 9/24/2015 10:15:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-004B SB-103 9/24/2015 10:15:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-005A SB-104 9/24/2015 9:30:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-005B SB-104 9/24/2015 9:30:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-006A SB-105 9/24/2015 9:00:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-006B SB-105 9/24/2015 9:00:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-007A SB-106 9/24/2015 12:15:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-007B SB-106 9/24/2015 12:15:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-008A SB-107 9/24/2015 12:00:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-008B SB-107 9/24/2015 12:00:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-009A SB-108 9/24/2015 11:00:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-009B SB-108 9/24/2015 11:00:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-010A MW-101 9/24/2015 11:15:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-010B MW-101 9/24/2015 11:15:00 AM 9/24/201515090765-011A MW-102 9/24/2015 1:05:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-011B MW-102 9/24/2015 1:05:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-012A MW-103 9/24/2015 1:00:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-012B MW-103 9/24/2015 1:00:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-013A MW-104 9/24/2015 12:30:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-013B MW-104 9/24/2015 12:30:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-014A MW-105 9/24/2015 12:45:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-014B MW-105 9/24/2015 12:45:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-015A MW-106 9/24/2015 1:15:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-015B MW-106 9/24/2015 1:15:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-016A MW-107 9/24/2015 1:10:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-016B MW-107 9/24/2015 1:10:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-017A MW-108 9/24/2015 1:35:00 PM 9/24/201515090765-017B MW-108 9/24/2015 1:35:00 PM 9/24/2015

2 of 61


October 07, 2015Date:STAT Analysis Corporation

Project: 3101004, Focus Evanston, 815-831 Emerson St.CLIENT: Apex Companies, LLC

Work Order: 15090765CASE NARRATIVE

Revision 1

Due to matrix interference, sample SB-107 (15090765-008) was analyzed at a medium level dilution (methanol vial).

3 of 61


Project: 3101004, Focus Evanston, 815-831 Emerson St.

Client Sample ID: SB-100

Collection Date: 9/24/2015 8:20:00 AM

Matrix: Soil

Analyses Result Qualifier Units Date AnalyzedRL

Client: Apex Companies, LLC

Work Order: 15090765

DF

Lab ID: 15090765-001

Date Printed: October 07, 2015

STAT Analysis Corporation2242 West Harrison St., Suite 200, Chicago, IL 60612-3766Tel: (312) 733-0551 Fax: (312) 733-2386 [email protected]

Date Reported: October 07, 2015

Accreditations:IEPA ELAP 100445;ORELAP IL300001;AIHA-LAP, LLC 101160;NVLAP LabCode 101202-0

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW5035/8260B Analyst: PSPrep Date: 9/24/20151,1,1-Trichloroethane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,1-Dichloroethane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,1-Dichloroethene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND


1,2-Dichloropropane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Butanone 9/30/20150.045 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/30/20150.012 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 9/30/20150.012 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Acetone 9/30/20150.045 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Bromodichloromethane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Bromoform 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Bromomethane 9/30/20150.0060 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Carbon disulfide 9/30/20150.030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Carbon tetrachloride 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Chlorobenzene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Chloroethane 9/30/20150.0060 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Chloroform 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Chloromethane 9/30/20150.0060 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9/30/20150.0012 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Dibromochloromethane 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Ethylbenzene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Methyl tert-butyl ether 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Methylene chloride 9/30/20150.0060 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Styrene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Tetrachloroethene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Toluene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9/30/20150.0012 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Trichloroethene 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Vinyl chloride 9/30/20150.0030 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Xylenes, Total 9/30/20150.0090 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/29/2015Acenaphthene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Qualifiers: J - Analyte detected below quanititation limitsB - Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank

S - Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limitsR - RPD outside accepted recovery limits

ND - Not Detected at the Reporting Limit

E - Value above quantitation range* - Non-accredited parameterHT - Sample received past holding time

H - Holding time exceeded

RL - Reporting / Quantitation Limit for the analysis

4 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-001





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/29/2015Acenaphthylene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Aniline 9/29/20150.38 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Anthracene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benz(a)anthracene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzidine 9/29/20150.38 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzo(a)pyrene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzoic acid 9/29/20150.95 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Benzyl alcohol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 9/29/20150.95 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Butyl benzyl phthalate 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Carbazole 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

4-Chloroaniline 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 9/29/20150.38 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Chloronaphthalene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Chlorophenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Chrysene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Dibenzofuran 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND



3,3´-Dichlorobenzidine 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2,4-Dichlorophenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Diethyl phthalate 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2,4-Dimethylphenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Dimethyl phthalate 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 9/29/20150.38 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2,4-Dinitrophenol 9/29/20150.95 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND


Di-n-butyl phthalate 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND







5 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-001





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/29/2015Di-n-octyl phthalate 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Fluoranthene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Fluorene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Hexachlorobenzene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Hexachlorobutadiene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Hexachloroethane 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Isophorone 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Methylnaphthalene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Methylphenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND


Naphthalene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2-Nitroaniline 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND



2-Nitrophenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND


Nitrobenzene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

N-Nitrosodimethylamine 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2, 2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Pentachlorophenol 9/29/20150.077 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Phenanthrene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Phenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Pyrene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.77 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 9/29/20150.19 mg/Kg-dry 1ND


Metals by ICP/MS SW6020 (SW3050B) Analyst: JGPrep Date: 10/1/2015Arsenic 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 105.8

Barium 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 1028

Cadmium 10/1/20150.56 mg/Kg-dry 10ND

Chromium 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 1012

Lead 10/1/20150.56 mg/Kg-dry 1013

Selenium 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 101.8







6 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-001





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Metals by ICP/MS SW6020 (SW3050B) Analyst: JGPrep Date: 10/1/2015Silver 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 10ND

Mercury SW7471A Analyst: LBPrep Date: 9/30/2015Mercury 9/30/20150.021 mg/Kg-dry 1ND

Percent Moisture D2974 Analyst: GHPrep Date: 9/25/2015Percent Moisture * 9/26/20150.2 wt% 113.1







7 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-002





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1












































8 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-002





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































9 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-002





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

































Barium 10/1/20151.2 mg/Kg-dry 1076



Lead 10/1/20150.61 mg/Kg-dry 1057








10 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-002





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1


Mercury SW7471A Analyst: LBPrep Date: 9/30/2015Mercury 9/30/20150.019 mg/Kg-dry 10.063








11 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-003





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





































Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3550B) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/29/2015Acenaphthene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.040







12 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-003





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1



Anthracene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.046

Benz(a)anthracene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.17


Benzo(a)pyrene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.19

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.18

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.13

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.16














Chrysene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.20

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.058





















13 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-003





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1


Fluoranthene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.45






Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.11

















Phenanthrene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.27


Pyrene 9/29/20150.039 mg/Kg-dry 10.42












14 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-004





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW5035/8260B Analyst: ARTPrep Date: 9/24/20151,1,1-Trichloroethane 9/30/20150.0033 mg/Kg-dry 1ND





1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9/30/20150.0033 mg/Kg-dry 10.011






Acetone 9/30/20150.049 mg/Kg-dry 10.086
































15 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-004





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































16 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-004





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

































Barium 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 1048



Lead 10/1/20150.55 mg/Kg-dry 10100








17 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-004





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Metals by ICP/MS SW6020 (SW3050B) Analyst: JGPrep Date: 10/1/2015Silver 10/1/20151.1 mg/Kg-dry 101.2









18 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-005





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1












































19 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-005





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1




Benz(a)anthracene 9/29/20150.037 mg/Kg-dry 10.14


Benzo(a)pyrene 9/29/20150.037 mg/Kg-dry 10.16


Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 9/29/20150.037 mg/Kg-dry 10.12
















Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 9/29/20150.037 mg/Kg-dry 10.056





















20 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-005





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1








Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 9/29/20150.037 mg/Kg-dry 10.11



















Pyrene 9/29/20150.037 mg/Kg-dry 10.35












21 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-006





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1












































22 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-006





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































23 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-006





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

































Barium 10/1/20151.2 mg/Kg-dry 1018



Lead 10/1/20150.58 mg/Kg-dry 108.8








24 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-006





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










25 of 61




Collection Date: 9/24/2015 12:15:00 PM

Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-007





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1












































26 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-007





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































27 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-007





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1







































28 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-008





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1






1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 10/3/20152.0 mg/Kg-dry 50051




















Ethylbenzene 10/1/20150.20 mg/Kg-dry 500.35


















29 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-008





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1














Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 9/29/20150.96 mg/Kg-dry 13.9































30 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-008





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Methylnaphthalene 9/29/20150.20 mg/Kg-dry 10.82



Naphthalene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 12.7














Pyrene 9/29/20150.038 mg/Kg-dry 10.082












31 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-009





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1












































32 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-009





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































33 of 61





Matrix: Soil




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-009





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1







































34 of 61



Client Sample ID: MW-101


Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-010





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8260B (SW5030B) Analyst: PSPrep Date:

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


1,1-Dichloroethane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

1,1-Dichloroethene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


1,2-Dichloropropane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2-Butanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

4-Methyl-2-pentanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Acetone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Bromodichloromethane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Bromoform 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Bromomethane 9/29/20150.010 mg/L 1ND

Carbon disulfide 9/29/20150.010 mg/L 1ND

Carbon tetrachloride 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Chlorobenzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Chloroethane 9/29/20150.010 mg/L 1ND

Chloroform 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Chloromethane 9/29/20150.010 mg/L 1ND

cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Dibromochloromethane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Ethylbenzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Methyl tert-butyl ether 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Methylene chloride 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Styrene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Tetrachloroethene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Toluene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Trichloroethene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Vinyl chloride 9/29/20150.0020 mg/L 1ND

Xylenes, Total 9/29/20150.015 mg/L 1ND

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3510C) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/28/2015Aniline 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND







35 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-010





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3510C) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/28/2015Benzidine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Benzoic acid 9/29/20150.025 mg/L 1ND

Benzyl alcohol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Butyl benzyl phthalate 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

4-Chloroaniline 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

4-Chloro-3-methylphenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2-Chloronaphthalene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2-Chlorophenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Dibenzofuran 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND



3,3´-Dichlorobenzidine 9/29/20150.010 mg/L 1ND

2,4-Dichlorophenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Diethyl phthalate 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2,4-Dimethylphenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Dimethyl phthalate 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol 9/29/20150.025 mg/L 1ND

2,4-Dinitrophenol 9/29/20150.025 mg/L 1ND

Di-n-butyl phthalate 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Di-n-octyl phthalate 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Hexachlorobenzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Hexachlorobutadiene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Hexachloroethane 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Isophorone 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2-Methylnaphthalene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2-Methylphenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


2-Nitroaniline 9/29/20150.025 mg/L 1ND



2-Nitrophenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND







36 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-010





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1

Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C (SW3510C) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/28/20154-Nitrophenol 9/29/20150.025 mg/L 1ND

N-Nitrosodimethylamine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2, 2'-oxybis(1-Chloropropane) 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 9/29/20150.010 mg/L 1ND


Semivolatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS SW8270C-SIM (SW3510C) Analyst: DMPrep Date: 9/28/2015Acenaphthene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Acenaphthylene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Anthracene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Benz(a)anthracene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Benzo(a)pyrene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Fluoranthene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Naphthalene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Phenanthrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Carbazole 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND


N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND

Nitrobenzene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND

Pentachlorophenol 9/29/20150.00050 mg/L 1ND







37 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-011





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Butanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND
















Styrene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













38 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-011





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































39 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-011





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND




Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













40 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-012





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Butanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND
















Styrene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













41 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-012





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































42 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-012





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND




Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













43 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-013





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Butanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND
















Styrene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













44 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-013





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































45 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-013





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND




Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













46 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-014





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Butanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND
















Styrene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













47 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-014





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































48 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-014





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND




Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













49 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-015





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Butanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 9/29/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND










cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 10.011






Styrene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













50 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-015





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































51 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-015





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND


Naphthalene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 10.0016


Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













52 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-016





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1







1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 10/5/20150.0050 mg/L 10.16



2-Butanone 10/5/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 10/5/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 10/5/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 10/5/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













Ethylbenzene 10/5/20150.0050 mg/L 10.021



Styrene 10/5/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 10/5/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND




Vinyl chloride 10/5/20150.0020 mg/L 10.0078









53 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-016





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1
































2-Methylnaphthalene 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 10.0055













54 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-016





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND


Naphthalene 9/30/20150.010 mg/L 100.050


Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













55 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-017





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1










2-Butanone 10/4/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

2-Hexanone 10/4/20150.020 mg/L 1ND


Acetone 10/4/20150.020 mg/L 1ND

Benzene 10/4/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND
















Styrene 10/4/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND


Toluene 10/4/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND













56 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-017





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1













































57 of 61





Matrix: Water




DF

Lab ID: 15090765-017





ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Revision 1





Phenol 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND

Pyridine 9/29/20150.0050 mg/L 1ND












Chrysene 9/29/20150.00010 mg/L 1ND



Fluorene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND




Pyrene 9/29/20150.0010 mg/L 1ND













58 of 61


59 of 61


60 of 61


61 of 61


Appendix E - Boring Logs


Apex Companies, LLC300 South Wacker Drive

Suite 630Chicago, IL 60606

16

1

15 Feet

1 Inch

8.25 Feet (Prior to sampling)

PROJECT NUMBER: 3101004 LOGGED BY: Sara LockePROJECT LOCATION: 815-830 Emerson Street DATE: September 24, 2015

SOIL BORING LOG / TEMPORARY MONITORING WELL CONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM

(847) 956-8589

PROJECT NAME: Focus Evanston SOIL BORING NUMBER: MW-101/SB-101

DRILLER: Marcus BOREHOLE DIAMETER: Inches - RodRIG TYPE: Truck-mounted Geoprobe WELL DEPTH:

Evanston, ILDRILLING CONTRACTOR: Environmental Soil Probing TOTAL BORING DEPTH: Feet

TOC ELEV (FT): --

SAMPLING METHOD: Dual Core WELL DIAMETER:

GROUND ELEV (FT): -- DEPTH TO WATER :

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

11" PVC well casing Fill: gravel and black and brown silty sand

< 52

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

2

SB-101 @ 3-5'

3

< 54

gray and brown Silty Sand 5

3Moist, compact

7

< 5

8.25'Gray

8

< 56

3

gray Silty Clay, wet

0.01" PVC well screen

11

< 5

9

10

4

12

13

▼

14 PVC cap at bottom of well casing

15Bottom of Boring at 15 feet

Page 1 of 1




12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


4.31'

12

Bottom of Boring at 12 feet

Page 1 of 1

10


11PVC cap at bottom of well casing


▼

4

< 5

gray Silty Clay wet< 5

6

< 5 Wet7

Gray8

9

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

3

11" PVC well casing Fill: gravel, black and brown silty sand

< 52

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

3

< 5SB-102 @ 3-5'

4

3

TOC ELEV (FT): --







(847) 956-8589





12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


617.4149.918.7

Silty Clay: gray, wet

Page 1 of 1

10

11

< 5 PVC cap at bottom of well casing

Black8


3

< 59

12



6

< 5 Wet7

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

3


2

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

3

SB-103 @ 1-3'

44.36'

3

< 5▼

TOC ELEV (FT): --







(847) 956-8589





12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


Page 1 of 1

11



▼

gray and brown Silty Sand5

6

< 5 Wet7

Gray8


4

< 59

10

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

1


< 52

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

3

< 5SB-104 @ 3-5'

Moist4

2

TOC ELEV (FT): --

4.10'







(847) 956-8589





12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


4.53'


Page 1 of 1

Wet7

Gray8


10

11


2

< 59

3

< 5SB-105 @ 3-5'

▼

1

gray and brown Silty Sand5

6

< 5

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

3

Gravel


< 52

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

Moist4

TOC ELEV (FT): --







(847) 956-8589





12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


24.7300.9

1004154

Page 1 of 1

Silty Sand: brown, gray

11


12

4< 5

9

10


▼

5

66.15'

Wet. Black sandy silt w/ odor7

Gray, sheen on water8


12.73

4.8

SB-106 @4 -6'

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

2

Concrete: 10"

11" PVC well casing

2

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

Moist, compact4

2

TOC ELEV (FT): --







(847) 956-8589





12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


170.6

1161129015911447

430.7

Page 1 of 1

128.7

Black sandy silt7

Gray8


4

9

11


12


▼

34.74'

49.610

Moist, strong odor4

3

SB-107 @ 3-5'

Wet

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

2

Concrete: 12"

11" PVC well casing Silty Sand: black, gray

2

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

5

6

TOC ELEV (FT): --







(847) 956-8589





12

1

12 Feet

1 Inch


Page 1 of 1

gray Silty Clay: wet

Moist, compact



11


12

4

< 5

3

▼


6

Wet9

10

< 5 Moist, compact7

7.89'Gray

8

3

< 5

SB-108 @ 4-6'

WA

TE

R L

EV

EL

SAMPLE DESCRIPTION

1


< 52

DE

PT

H I

N F

EE

T

RE

CO

VE

RY

(F

T)

PID

(p

pm

)

LA

BO

RA

TO

RY

I.D

.

WE

LL

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

GR

AP

HIC

LO

G

4

TOC ELEV (FT): --







(847) 956-8589



Apex Companies, LLC531 West Golf Road

Arlington Heights, IL 60005(847) 956-8589

ENGINEERED BACKFILL / CRUSHED DOLOSTONE

Clayey Fill

Brick

FILL

GRAVEL

CLAYEY SAND

SILTY SAND

SAND AND GRAVEL

SAND

SILTY CLAY

CLAY

SOIL BORING LOG KEY

SANDY SILT

SILT

CLAYEY SILT

CONCRETE

ASPHALT

SANDY CLAY

LOAM / PEAT

TOPSOIL


Appendix F - City of Evanston Ordinance No. 98062401


Appendix G - Contaminant Migration (Tier 2) Calculation


X 170 ft

x 5.182 m

y 1.727 m

z 0.259 m

0.0019 1/day Degradation constant for vinyl chloride

K 0.00074 cm/sec

i 0.02 Site-specific value

ΘT 0.32 Default for silty sand

U 3.996

Sw 30 ft Conservative estimate

Sd 6 ft

Csource 0.0074 mg/liter Concentration detected in MW-107

A1 5A2 -0.4091A -2.0454e^A 0.12933B 0.24erf(B) 0.9726C 0.25erf(C) 0.2763

X x Sw Sd

Cx = Csource exp x U yx)1/2 yx)1/2

Cx = 0.0003 mg/literRemediation Objective for Class I Groundwater: 0.002 mg/l

Notes:

X = Distance to compliance (cm) ΘT = Total Soil Porosity (cm3/cm3)

x = Longitudinal Dispersivity (cm) U = Specific Discharge (cm/day)

y = Transverse Dispersivity (cm) Sw = Source Width

z = Vertical Dispersivity (cm) Sd = Source Depth

= Chemical Specific Degradation Constant (days-1) Csource = Maximum Concentration (mg/l)

K = Hydraulic Conductivity (cm/sec) Cx = Concentration at distance X from the source (mg/l)

i = Hydraulic Gradient (cm/cm)

i = Hydraulic Gradient (cm/cm)

)

Estimated saturated thickness in Well MW-107

( (1-(1+ )1/2)) erf( ) erf(

McCormick Place Hotel, Chicago, Illinois815-831 Emerson Street

Equation R-26Vinyl Chloride

Compliance Distance (MW-107 to southern property boundary)

Calculated value


Appendix H - Worker Notification Statement


1 of 1

WORKER NOTIFICATION STATEMENT

FOR WORKERS PERFORMING INVASIVE EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES 815-831 EMERSON STREET, EVANSTON, ILLINOIS

October 2015

Apex Companies, LLC has prepared this Worker Notification Statement for any future invasive earthwork activities for the commercial property located at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Cook County, Illinois (the Site). The Site consists of approximately 1.0-acre of land, improved with a 20,747 square foot (SF) two-story in-line shopping center. Soil sampling/analysis at the Site detected naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in a soil sample at concentrations in excess of the Construction Worker Inhalation soil remediation objectives (SROs) detailed in 35 Illinois Administrative Code 742. The exceedances are summarized below.

Compound

mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram

Highest Concentration

SROs

Construction Worker Inhalation

naphthalene 2.7 1.8

1,2,4-trimethylbenzene 51 8.9

This notification statement has been developed to inform workers performing invasive earthwork activities at the Site that precautions should be taken to avoid ingestion of dust/soil at the Site. Workers most likely to be exposed to naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene are those performing tasks with significant contact with the soil/fill, including: hand excavation, concrete framing, and laborers performing utility/pipeline installation, etc. Potential exposure pathways for naphthalene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in soil would be from inhalation and ingestion of airborne soil particles transferred from hands, gloves, boots, clothing, tools, etc. This document is not intended to address physical hazards relating to equipment operation, excavation or slope/trench stability or similar construction-related hazards.


Apex Companies, LLC apexcos.com 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 630 Chicago, Illinois 60606 T 847.956.8589 x3205 F 847.956.8619 1701 East Woodfield Road, Suite 333 Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 T 847.956.8589 F 847.956.8619

October 13, 2015 Ms. Vicky Lee Development Manager CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC (Focus) 191 Waukegan Road, Suite 202 Northfield, Illinois 60093 Re: Asbestos Inspection Report Commercial Property 815-831 Emerson Street Evanston, Cook County, Illinois

Apex Project No.: 3101004.002

Dear Ms. Lee: CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC (Focus) retained Apex Companies, LLC (Apex) to conduct an asbestos inspection of the commercial structure located at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Cook County Illinois. On September 18, 2015, Apex representative Mr. Michael Serio, an Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH)-licensed asbestos inspector, conducted a visual inspection of the interior and exterior areas of the proposed site location. A copy of Mr. Serio’s asbestos inspector license is included in Attachment 1. The scope of work for this project consisted of a thorough visual inspection and sampling of suspect materials from accessible components for laboratory analysis.

The Site consists of approximately 0.96 acres and is improved with a commercial building with four units. The western portion of the building is two-stories and was reportedly built in 1958. The western portion of the building is currently occupied by office space and a dry cleaners (Lake City Cleaners) on the First Floor. The Second Floor is currently occupied by a fitness center (Ultimate Fitness). In approximately 1988, a single-story addition was constructed on the eastern side of the Site. The eastern portion of the building consists of two store fronts. One unit is currently occupied by a 7-Eleven convenience store. The other was formerly occupied by a sandwich shop (Philly’s Best) and is currently vacant. Asbestos Inspection Results Apex collected seventy-eight (78) bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing building materials (ACBMs) on the interior and exterior of the proposed site and due to multiple layers, ninety-five (95) analyses were conducted using Polarized-Light Microscopy (PLM), following the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) PLM Method EPA-600/R-93/116. The Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analyses were performed by STAT Analysis Corporation (STAT), a National Institute of Standards and Technology National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)-accredited asbestos laboratory (NVLAP Lab Cod 101202-0) located in Chicago, Illinois. A chain-of-custody, documenting the possession of the samples from the time they were collected until they have been analyzed and stored, was submitted with the bulk samples. The original chain-of-custody accompanied the materials at all times. Custody documentation began at the time the sample was collected and a copy of the chain-of-custody record was retained by each transferor. The NVLAP accreditation certificate for the STAT asbestos laboratory is provided in Attachment 1. The suspect materials were sampled in general accordance with the EPA’s Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) sampling protocol. The results of the asbestos inspection conducted at the Site indicated that fourteen (14) of the materials were confirmed to be asbestos-containing materials (ACM). EPA defines an ACM as any material or


Asbestos Inspection Report October 13, 2015 CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC. – Commercial Property – Evanston, Illinois Page 2

product which contains greater than one (1) percent (>1%) asbestos, as determined by using PLM. PLM results reported:

HA-831-7: Non-friable 9”x 9” beige vinyl floor tile (5-10% Chrysotile asbestos) – 1st Floor – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-7: black mastic (1-2% Chrysotile asbestos) associated with non-friable 9”x 9” beige vinyl floor tile – 1st Floor – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-16: Non-friable 9”x9” brown vinyl floor tile (5-10% Chrysotile asbestos) and associated black mastic (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) – 2nd Floor – 823 Emerson;

HA-831-16: Black mastic (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) associated with non-friable 9”x9” brown vinyl floor tile and – 2nd Floor – 823 Emerson;

HA-831-5: Friable white pipe run insulation (1-5% Chrysotile, 5-10% Amosite, and 1-5% Crocidolite asbestos) – 1st Floor – 831 Emerson;

HA-831-8: Friable paper pipe wrap insulation (5-10% Chrysotile asbestos) – 1st Floor – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-12: Friable air cell pipe wrap insulation (5-10% Chrysotile asbestos) – 1st Floor – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-6: Friable hard pipe fitting insulation (5-10% Chrysotile asbestos) – 1st Floor – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-10: Non-friable exterior tan window caulk (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-9: Non-friable interior tan window caulk (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-11: Non-friable exterior tan door caulk (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) – 831 Emerson Street;

HA-831-17: Non-friable exterior silver roof tar coating (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) – 815-831 Emerson Street; and,

HA-831-17: Non-friable exterior black roof tar (1-5% Chrysotile asbestos) – 815-831 Emerson Street.

Refer to the Sample Table provided in Attachment 2 showing the building materials sampled and the corresponding analytical results (Attachment 3). Refer to the asbestos location diagrams provided in Attachment 4 showing the general ACM locations. Photographic documentation of the ACMs identified on-site is provided in Attachment 5.

Since ACMs are present, actions should be taken to prevent a fiber release and to minimize exposure to employees and contractors to asbestos fibers. The following are Apex’s recommendations for management of ACMs.

If the identified ACMs will be disturbed or damaged during the proposed renovation/demolition at the proposed Site they should be abated by an IDPH-licensed asbestos abatement contractor in accordance with Illinois asbestos regulations prior to renovation activities.

If the ACM will remain in-place, maintenance personnel, contractors, and other subcontractors should be made aware of the location of the ACMs and the possibility of concealed suspect ACM that could be found during renovation/demolition activities. They should be advised to not disturb the identified ACBMs or suspect ACM.


Asbestos Inspection Report October 13, 2015 CA/Focus Evanston JV, LLC. – Commercial Property – Evanston, Illinois Page 3

Any concealed building materials discovered during renovation/demolition activities not identified in this report, which are suspected to contain asbestos, should be sampled by an IDPH-licensed asbestos inspector and analyzed by an NVLAP-accredited laboratory to confirm the absence or presence of asbestos prior to disturbing such materials. If the materials are found to contain asbestos, applicable local, state and federal regulations will apply.

The Sample Table, laboratory analytical report, asbestos chains-of-custody, photographic documentation, sample and asbestos location diagrams, and certifications/licenses are provided as attachments to this letter report. Apex appreciates the opportunity to be of service to Focus on this project. If you have questions or comments regarding the information in this report please do not hesitate to contact the Apex office at (847) 956-8589 x3205.

Sincerely, Apex Companies, LLC

Michael Serio Matthew Otto Project Manager Division Manager, Illinois IDPH No.: 100-18488 IDPH No.: 100-07753 Attachments Attachment 1: Apex Inspector and Laboratory Certifications/Licenses Attachment 2: ACBM Tables Attachment 3: Laboratory Report and Chains-of-Custody Attachment 4: Asbestos Location Diagrams Attachment 5: Photographic Documentation


ATTACHMENT 1

INSPECTOR AND LABORATORY CERTIFICATIONS/LICENSES


ATTACHMENT 2

SAMPLE TABLES


MTL Group #

Material Description

Locations F/NF Condition %ACM # SamplesEst.

Quantity (SF)

815-1Drywall and

joint compound

Throughout store F Good

Drywall:ND

Joint compound:

ND

3 2,5000 SF

815-2

Tan mastic associated

with 4'' black vinyl covebase

Throughout store NF Good ND 1 100 LF

815-3

Yellow mastic associated with white plastic wall paneling

Throughout store NF Good ND 3 1,500 SF

815-42'x4' drywall suspended ceiling tile


Sample Table

Philly's Best Sandwich Shop815 Emerson StreetEvanston, Illinois


MTL Group #



Quantity (SF)

817-1

12"x12" beige floor tile and associated

yellow mastic


817-2

12"x12" tan floor tile and associated

yellow mastic

Throughout store NF Good ND 3 500 SF

817-3

2'x4' dot and fissure

suspended ceiling tile

Throughout store F Good ND 3 1,500 SF

817-4

6" tan vinyl covebase and

associated yellow mastic

Throughout store NF Good

Covebase:ND

Mastic: ND

1 110 LF

817-5Drywall and

joint compound

Throughout store F Good

Drywall:ND

Joint compound:

ND

3 8,000 SF

817-62'x4' drywall suspended ceiling tile

Throughout store NF Good ND 3 500 SF

Sample Table

7-Eleven Store817 Emerson StreetEvanston, Illinois


MTL Group #



Quantity (SF)

821-1

2'x4' dot and fissured

suspended ceiling tile

Throughout office F Good ND 3 800 SF

821-2

12"x12" beige floor tile and associated

yellow mastic

Restrooms NF Good ND 3 400 SF

821-3Drywall and

joint compound

Walls throughout office

F Good

Drywall:ND

Joint compound:

ND

3 5,000 SF

821-4 White EIFS Front of building NF Good ND 3 1,700 SF

821-5 Tan EIFS Front of building NF Good ND 3 3,000 SF

Sample Table

Office of the building821 Emerson StreetEvanston, Illinois


MTL Group #

Material Description Locations F/NF Condition %ACM # SamplesEst. Quantity

(SF)

831-1 Beige TerrazzoFloor of entrance to dry cleaners

NF Good ND 3 500 SF

831-2 Green TerrazzoFloor of sales area

of dry cleanersNF Good ND 3 2,000 SF

831-3Drywall and joint

compound

Walls throughout dry cleaners and

gymF Good

Drywall:ND

Joint compound: ND

3 30,000 SF

831-44" black vinyl covebase

and associated tan mastic

Base of walls throughout dry

cleaners and gymNF Good

Covebase:ND

Mastic:ND

3 350 LF

831-5White pipe run

insulationThroughout dry

cleanersF Fair

1-5% Chrysotile 5-10% Amosite

1-5% Crocidolite

3 850 LF

831-6White pipe fitting


cleanersF Fair

5-10% Chrysotile

3 200 LF

831-79"x9" beige floor tile and associated black

mastic

Floor of south east corner of

work areaNF Good

Floor Tile:5-10%

ChrysotileMastic:

1-2% Chrysotile

3 200 SF

831-8Paper pipe wrap


cleanersF Fair

5-10% Chrysotile

3 600 LF

831-9Interior tan window

glazeThroughout dry

cleaners and gymNF Good 1-5% Chrysotile 3 160 LF

831-10Exterior tan window

CaulkThroughout dry

cleaners and gymNF Good 1-5% Chrysotile 3 160 LF

831-11 Exterior tan door caulk Exterior doors NF Good 1-5% Chrysotile 3 50 LF

831-12Air cell pipe wrap


cleanersNF Fair

10-15% Chrysotile

3 50 LF

831-13 White boiler gasket Boiler room F Good ND 1 20 LF

831-14 Boiler brick Boiler room NF Good ND 1 8 SF

831-15Black rubber roof and associated black tar

Roof NF Good

Roof:NDTar:ND

1 175 SF

831-169"x9" brown floor tile and associated black

mastic

Floor throughout gym

NF Good

Floor Tile:5-10%

ChrysotileMastic:

1-5% Chrysotile

3 15,000 SF

831-17Silver tar roof and

associated black tarRoof NF Good

Roof:1-5% Chrysotile

Tar:1-5% Chrysotile

1 22,000 SF

Sample Table

Lake City Cleaners and Gym823-831 Emerson Street

Evanston, Illinois


ATTACHMENT 3

LABORATORY REPORT AND CHAINS-OF-CUSTODY


ATTACHMENT 4

ACBM LOCATION DIAGRAMS


ATTACHMENT 5

PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION


Site Photographs Commercial Building Apex Companies, LLC 815-831 Emerson Street Evanston, Illinois

Photograph 1 View of the Lake City Cleaners Location at 815-831 Emerson Street in Evanston, Illinois.

Photograph 2 View of asbestos-containing 9”x 9” beige vinyl floor tile and associated black mastic (HA-831-7) at the 831 Emerson Street location.

Photograph 3 View of asbestos-containing 9”x 9” brown vinyl floor tile and associated black mastic (HA-831-16) on the 2nd Floor at the 823 Emerson Street location.



Photograph 4 View of asbestos-containing white pipe run insulation (HA-831-5) at the 831 Emerson Street location.

Photograph 5 View of asbestos-containing paper pipe wrap insulation (HA-831-8) at the 831 Emerson Street location.

Photograph 6 View of asbestos-containing hard fitting insulation (HA-831-6) at the 831 Emerson Street location.



Photograph 7 View of asbestos-containing exterior tan window caulk (HA-831-10) throughout 823 and 831 Emerson Street location.

Photograph 8 View of asbestos-containing interior tan window caulk (HA-831-9) throughout 823 and 831 Emerson Street location.

Photograph 9 View of asbestos-containing exterior tan door caulk (HA-831-11) throughout 821 and 831 Emerson Street location.



Photograph 10 View of asbestos-containing air cell pipe wrap insulation (HA-831-12) 831 Emerson Street location.

Photograph 11 View of asbestos-containing silver roof tar coating and associated black tar (HA-831-17) throughout 815 - 831 Emerson Street location.


draft text amendment - city of evanston

Documents