draft benicia refinery tia may2013f991a639...draft trans valero ben may 2013 1.0 1.1 the valer the...

Prepared for:

Valero Energy Corporation

ERM

May 2013

WC13-3005

Draft Transportation Impact Analysis Report

VALERO BENICIA REFINERYCRUDE BY RAIL PROJECT

DDraft TTranspportati

Vale

Cr

Va

ion Im

ero Be

rude b

lero En

mpact A

nicia R

by Rail

Preergy Co

Analy

Refine

l Proje

epared forporat

ER

May 2

WC13

ysis

ery

ect

for: ion RM

2013

3-3005

Draft TransValero BenMay 2013

1.0 IN

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

1.

2.0 EX

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

2.

3.0 EX

3.

sportation Impaicia Refinery Cr

NTRODUCTIO

.1 Backgr

.2 Project

.3 Study

.4 Study

.5 Analys

.6 Analys

1.6.1

1.6.2

.7 Signifi

.8 Report

XISTING CON

.1 Project

.2 Study

.3 Existin

2.3.1

2.3.2

.4 Existin

.5 Existin

.6 Existin

.7 Existin

.8 Collisio

.9 Existin

.10 Existin

2.10.1

2.10.2

2.10.3

XISTING PLU

.1 Project

act Analysis rude by Rail Pro

ON ................

round ..............

t Description

Purpose .........

Area .................

sis Scenarios ..

sis Methods ...

Unsignalized

Traffic Opera

cance Criteria

t Organization

NDITIONS ....

t Location ......

Area Roadwa

g Pedestrian

Pedestrian F

Bicycle Facili

g Transit Serv

g Freight Rail

g Truck Route

g Emergency

on History ......

g Lane Config

g Intersection

Model App

Model Valid

Intersection

US PROJECT C

t Assumption

oject

Table

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

d Intersection

ations Analys

a ..........................

n ........................

......................

...........................

ays ......................

and Bicycle F

Facilities ...........

ities ...................

vice ....................

l ..........................

es .......................

y Vehicle Resp

...........................

gurations and

n Operations .

proach ..............

dation ..............

n Operations

CONDITIONS

ns ........................

e of Conten

.....................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

s ........................

is Software ....

...........................

...........................

.....................

...........................

...........................

acilities ...........

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

ponse Times ..

...........................

d Traffic Volum

...........................

...........................

...........................

Results ...........

S ...................

...........................

nts

......................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

......................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

mes ..................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

......................

..........................

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......................

...........................

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......................

...........................

....... 1

......... 1

......... 1

......... 1

......... 3

......... 3

......... 4

......... 4

......... 6

......... 6

......... 8

....... 9

......... 9

......... 9

...... 10

...... 10

...... 10

...... 10

...... 11

...... 13

...... 14

...... 14

...... 15

...... 19

...... 19

...... 19

...... 20

..... 23

...... 23


3.

3.

3.

4.0 C

4.

4.

4.

4.

Appendix

Appendix

Figure 1-1

Figure 1-2

Figure 2-1

Figure 2-2

Figure 3-1

Figure 4-1

Figure 4-2


.2 Interse

3.2.1

3.2.2

.3 Existin

3.3.1

.4 Emerg

UMULATIVE

.1 Cumul

.2 Cumul

.3 Interse

4.3.1

4.3.2

.4 Cumul

A: Existing Tr

B: Intersectio

1 Regional V

2 Project Stu

1 Average W

2 Existing Co

1 Existing Plu

1 Cumulative

2 Cumulative


ection Operat

AM Peak Ho

Off-Peak Ho

g Project Imp

Transit Impa

ency Vehicle

CONDITION

lative Year Vo

lative Year Ro

ection Operat

AM Peak Ho

OFF-Peak Ho

lative Project

raffic Data

on Analysis W

Vicinity Map ...

udy Area..........

Weekday Traff

onditions Inte

us Project Qu

e Conditions I

e Plus Project

oject

tions Results ..

our Operation

our Operation

pacts and Miti

acts ....................

Access ............

NS ..................

olume Forecas

oadway Netwo

tions Results ..

our Operation

our Operation

Impacts and

Ap

Worksheets

List

...........................

...........................

ic Volumes by

ersection Peak

euing Analys

Intersection P

t Queuing Ana

...........................

s Results ........

s Results ........

igation Measu

...........................

...........................

.....................

sts .....................

ork ....................

...........................

s Results ........

ns Results .......

Mitigation M

ppendices

of Figures

...........................

...........................

y Time of Day

k Hour Traffic

is .......................

Peak Hour Tra

alysis ................

..........................

..........................

..........................

ures..................

..........................

..........................

......................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

..........................

easures ..........

s

..........................

..........................

y on Park Roa

Volumes and

..........................

affic Volumes

..........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

ad .......................

d Lane Config

...........................

and Lane Co

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

gurations .........

...........................

nfigurations .

...........................

...... 24

...... 24

...... 25

...... 30

...... 31

...... 32

..... 34

...... 34

...... 36

...... 36

...... 36

...... 37

...... 42

......... 2

......... 5

...... 17

...... 18

...... 29

...... 35

...... 44


Table 1-1

Table 2-1

Table 2-2

Table 2-3

Table 2-4

Table 2-5

Table 2-6

Table 3-1

Table 3-2

Table 3-3

Table 3-4

Table 4-1

Table 4-2

Table 4-3

Table 4-4


Unsignalize

Fairfield an

Existing AT

Study Area

Validation

Existing Int

Existing Int

Existing Plu

Existing Plu

Existing Plu

Existing Plu

Cumulative

Cumulative

Cumulative

Cumulative


ed Intersectio

nd Suisun Tran

T-Grade Rail O

a Collision His

Criteria Thres

tersection AM

tersection AM

us Project AM

us Project Off

us Project AM

us Project OFF

e Plus Project

e Plus Project

e Plus Project

e Plus Project

oject

List

on LOS Criteria

nsit (FAST) Tra

Operations ......

tory Summar

sholds Compa

M Peak Hour L

M Peak Hour Q

M Peak Hour In

-Peak Hour In

M Peak Hour In

F-Peak Hour I

AM Peak Hou

Off-Peak Hou

AM Peak Hou

Off-Peak Hou

t of Tables

a ........................

ansit Service S

...........................

ry – January 2

arison ...............

Levels of Servi

Queuing WIth

ntersection Le

ntersection Le

ntersection Q

Intersection Q

ur Intersectio

ur Intersectio

ur Intersectio

ur Intersectio

..........................

Summary .......

..........................

009 thru Janu

..........................

ice WIthout R

hout Rail Cros

evels of Servic

evels of Servic

Queuing ...........

Queuing ..........

n Levels of Se

n Levels of Se

n Queuing ....

n Queuing ....

...........................

...........................

...........................

uary 2012 ........

...........................

Rail Crossing A

sing Activity ..

ce .......................

ce .......................

...........................

...........................

ervice ...............

ervice ...............

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

Activity ............

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

...........................

......... 6

...... 11

...... 12

...... 15

...... 20

...... 21

...... 22

...... 26

...... 26

...... 27

...... 28

...... 39

...... 39

...... 40

...... 41


1.0

1.1

The Valer

The refine

of the mo

Joaquin V

feedstock

oil deliver

provided

1.2

The propo

sources b

refinery b

delivered

expected

at-grade

deliveries

two railca

expected

1.3

The purp

implemen

undertake

assist in

impacts

transporta

and cumu


INTRO

BACKG

o Refinery is

ery was built

ost complex re

Valley in Calif

k throughput

ries currently

on Figure 1-1

PROJEC

osed Valero

by rail into the

by railcar, to u

to the refin

to use an exis

railroad cross

would arrive

ar deliveries

to increase th

STUDY

ose of this s

ntation of th

en to maintain

identifying ad

from Project

ation impacts

ulative conditi


ODUCTIO

ROUND

located on 88

in 1968 and h

efineries in th

fornia and the

capacity of 17

arrive by pip

1.

CT DESCR

Benicia Refin

e refinery. Th

up to 70,000

ery because

sting Union P

sing at Park

at the refiner

are expected

he number of

PURPOS

study is to e

e Project. Th

n compliance

dditional traf

t activities t

s of the increa

ions.

oject

ON

80 acres nort

has undergon

he United Sta

e Alaskan No

70,000 barrel

peline and m

RIPTION

ery Crude by

he Project wo

barrels per d

train deliver

Pacific Railroad

Road, just ea

ry each day a

d per day, to

f employees a

SE

evaluate pote

he study of

with Californ

ffic controls

to levels of

ased rail cros

h of the Carq

ne significant

tes. The refin

orth Slope, al

s per day and

marine vessels

y Rail Project

ould expand

day, but would

ries would re

d (UPRR) trac

ast of the int

nd in trains u

otaling appro

at the refinery

ential impacts

anticipated

nia Environme

or mitigation

insignificanc

ssings on the

quinez Strait i

modification

nery processe

ong with for

d employs ap

s. A regional

would ship c

the proportio

d not increas

eplace ship d

ck to access th

ersection of

up to 50 railca

oximately 10

y.

s to local ro

impacts to t

ental Quality A

n that may b

ce. This stu

local transpo

in the City of

s and upgrad

es domestic c

eign crudes.

pproximately 4

l vicinity map

crude oil from

on of crude o

se the total v

deliveries. Rai

he refinery, cr

Park Road/Ba

ars in length p

0 railcars. T

oadways and

the transport

Act (CEQA) re

be needed to

dy focuses

ortation netw

Benicia, Calif

des to becom

crude from th

The refinery

480 people. C

p of the refin

m North Ame

oil delivered t

olume of cru

ilcar deliverie

rossing the ex

ayshore Road

per delivery.

The Project i

intersections

tation system

equirements a

o reduce pot

on the pot

work under ex

1

fornia.

me one

he San

has a

Crude

nery is

erican

to the

de oil

es are

xisting

d. The

Up to

is not

s with

m was

and to

tential

tential

xisting

Benicia

Richmond

Pittsburg

Fair�eld

Walnut Creek

Benicia

Richmond

Pittsburg

Fair�eld

Walnut Creek

S O L A N OC O U N T Y

N A P AC O U N T Y

C O N T R A C O S T AC O U N T Y

A L A M E D AC O U N T Y

80

80

680

780

580

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

12CALIFORNIA

4CALIFORNIA

24CALIFORNIA

242CALIFORNIA

13CALIFORNIA

29CALIFORNIA

37CALIFORNIA

2nFigure 1-1.

Regional VicinityWC13-3005_1-1_RegVic


1.4

The five

increased

for analys

1. Pa

2. In

3. I-

4. Pa

5. Pa

The I-680

intersectio

Freeway o

this study

in the pea

trips, and

1.5

Study inte

Scenario

January 2

operation

Scenario

collected

at-grade r

Scenario

to reflect

control de


STUDY

intersections

vehicle queu

is.

ark Road / Ba

nterstate 680

680 Northbo

ark Road / Ba

ark Road / Va

0 ramp-termi

ons fall under

operations alo

y. Generally, a

ak direction b

therefore wo

ANALY

ersection ope

1: Existing C

2013 and obs

s were also d

2: Existing P

in January 20

railroad cross

3: Cumulati

year 2035 co

evices as Exist


AREA

listed below

ues that could

ayshore Road

(I-680) South

und Off-Ram

ay Vista Court

alero Refinery

inal intersect

r the jurisdicti

ong segments

a freeway ana

by more than

ould not increa

YSIS SCEN

rations were e

Conditions –

served inters

ocumented fo

Plus Project C

013 and assum

ing.

ive No Projec

nditions. The

ting condition

oject

w and shown

d form at inte

bound On-Ra

p / Bayshore

t

y Entrance

tions listed a

on of the City

s of I-680 and

alysis is unde

n three perce

ase peak hou

NARIOS

evaluated for

– Evaluates int

section lane c

or a 7-day pe

Conditions –

ming rail deliv

ct Conditions

e analysis assu

ns.

on Figure

ersections du

amp / Baysho

Road

above fall un

y of Benicia.

d I-780 within

rtaken if a pro

nt. The Proje

r trips on free

the following

tersection op

configuration

eriod in April.

– Evaluates int

veries of up to

s – Cumulative

umes the sam

1-2 are the

uring train cro

ore Road

nder the juri

n the study ar

oject is expec

ect is not exp

eways in the s

g scenarios:

perations base

ns and traffic

tersection op

o 50 railcars i

e No Project t

me intersection

most likely

ossings, and w

isdiction of

rea were not a

cted to increa

pected to gen

study area.

ed on traffic c

c control dev

erations base

n length utiliz

traffic forecas

n lane config

to be affecte

were thus sel

Caltrans; all

analyzed as p

ase peak hou

nerate new v

counts collect

vices. Existin

ed on traffic c

zing the Park

sts were deve

urations and

3

ed by

lected

other

part of

r trips

vehicle

ted in

ng rail

counts

k Road

eloped

traffic


Scenario

forecast e

utilizing th

1.6

The oper

qualitative

travel tim

operating

capacity.”

as LOS F.

1.6.1 U

For unsign

Research

With this

The contr

in queue.

At side-st

the left-tu

average d

intersectio


4: Cumulati

estimates dev

he Park Road

ANALY

ations of roa

e description

e, delay, and

conditions)

When volum

UNSIGNALIZ

nalized (all-wa

Board’s 2000

method, ope

ol delay inco

Table 1-1 s

treet stop-con

urn moveme

delay and h

ons.


ive Plus Proje

veloped unde

at-grade rail

YSIS METH

adway faciliti

of traffic flow

freedom to

to LOS F (w

mes exceed c

ZED INTERS

ay stop-contr

0 Highway Cap

rations are de

rporates dela

summarizes th

ntrolled inter

nt from the

ighest move

oject

ect Condition

r Scenario 3 a

road crossing

HODS

es are descr

w from a veh

maneuver. S

worst operati

capacity, stop

SECTIONS

rolled and sid

pacity Manua

efined by the

ay associated

he relationsh

rsections, the

major street

ement/approa

ns – Evaluates

and assuming

g.

ribed with th

hicle driver’s p

ix levels of se

ing condition

-and-go cond

e-street stop

al (HCM) met

average cont

with decelera

ip between d

delay is calc

, as well as

ach delay ar

s intersection

g rail deliverie

he term “leve

perspective b

ervice are def

ns). LOS E

ditions result

-controlled) i

hod for unsig

trol delay per

ation, accelera

delay and LOS

culated for ea

the intersect

re reported f

operations b

es of up to 5

el of service”

based on fact

fined ranging

corresponds

and operatio

ntersections,

gnalized inter

r vehicle (mea

ation, stoppin

S for unsigna

ach stop-con

tion average.

for side-stre

based on year

0 railcars in l

” (LOS). LOS

ors such as s

g from LOS A

to operation

ons are desig

the Transpor

rsections was

asured in seco

ng, and movi

alized intersec

trolled move

The interse

et stop-cont

4

r 2035

ength

S is a

speed,

A (best

ns “at

nated

tation

used.

onds).

ng up

ctions.

ement,

ection

trolled

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Bay Vista CtBay Vista Ct

Bayshore Rd

Bayshore Rd

680

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

1

2

3

4

5

2n

LEGEND

UPRR OverlandRoute (Spur)

UPRR OverlandRoute (Mainline)

Roadway Count Location

Study Intersection1

UPRR At-Grade Crossing

Figure 1-2.

Study AreaWC13-3005_1-2_StudyArea


Source: 2000

1.6.2

The traffic

simulation

and bicyc

intersectio

model req

volumes,

study are

also prov

intersectio

evaluate t

1.7

Significan

therefore

intersectio

to interse

below LO

potentially

expected


Level of Servic

A

B

C

D

E

F

0 Highway Capac

TRAFFIC

c operations

n software tha

cles. The softw

ons, roundab

quires many

and vehicle b

a as a system

vides an acc

on. VISSIM ha

the congestio

SIGNIFI

ce criteria a

requires mi

on operations

ection operati

OS D. This c

y increase ve

to increase v


UNSIG

ce

city Manual.

OPERATIO

analysis for t

at analyzes th

ware can ana

outs, ramp m

components

behavior cha

m and accoun

urate assessm

as the capabil

n that builds

ICANCE C

re used to

tigation. The

s but does no

ons are cons

criteria is typ

ehicle trips a

ehicle trips w

oject

TGNALIZED IN

D

Little

Shor

Avera

Long

Very lo

Extreme intersectio

NS ANALYS

the project ut

he traffic ope

alyze both art

meters, and at

. These com

racteristics. M

nts for queui

ment of ave

ity to simulat

as the roadw

CRITERIA

determine w

e City of Ben

ot provide sta

sidered signif

pically used t

at intersection

within the stud

TABLE 1-1 TERSECTION

Description

e or no delays

rt traffic delays

ge traffic delay

g traffic delays

ong traffic delay

traffic delays wn capacity exce

SIS SOFTWA

tilized the VIS

rations of car

terial and fre

t-grade railro

ponents inclu

Micro-simulati

ng interactio

erage vehicle

te roadway bl

way is blocked

A

whether a pro

nicia General

ndards for at

ficant if the P

to assess im

ns within the

dy area and le

N LOS CRITER

ys

ys

with eeded

ARE

SSIM softwar

rs, trucks, tran

eeway corrido

oad crossings

ude lane geo

ion provides

ns between i

delay and

lockages due

.

oject impact

l Plan provid

t-grade railroa

Project causes

pacts of dev

e study area.

evel of service

RIA

Delay i

<

> 10.

> 15.

> 25.

> 35.

>

re platform. V

nsit vehicles,

ors, signalized

. The develop

ometries, traf

the capabilit

intersections.

queue lengt

to at-grade t

is considere

des a LOS s

ad crossing o

s intersection

velopment pr

. However,

e is not the o

in Seconds

< 10.0

.0 to 15.0

.0 to 25.0

.0 to 35.0

.0 to 50.0

> 50.0

VISSIM is a m

trains, pedest

d and unsign

pment of a V

ffic controls,

ty of analyzin

Micro-simu

ths at each

train crossing

ed significant

standard of

operations. Im

n operations t

rojects that w

the Project i

nly metric tha

6

micro-

trians,

alized

VISSIM

traffic

ng the

ulation

study

gs and

t and

D for

mpacts

to fall

would

is not

at can


be used t

solely bas

through in

with inter

at-grade

applicable

Vehicle qu

traffic op

related, th

case durin

volumes a

with resu

Even tho

accommo

adversely

Although

operation

increased

A

t

Additiona

W

lim

by

W

o

W

o

in

W


o evaluate im

sed on avera

ndustrial area

mittent at-gr

railroad cros

e to at-grade

ueues that re

erations with

he longer the

ng times of th

are low, it is p

lting vehicle

ugh average

odated within

affect the sur

the City of B

s, the Projec

rail activity o

A Project imp

that impede

intersection a

al significance

Would the Proj

mited to leve

y the county

Would the Proj

r a change in

Would the Pro

r dangerous

ncreased frequ

Would the proj


mpacts of incr

age delay inc

as served by a

ade rail activi

sing. Therefo

railroad cross

esult from at-g

hin the vicinit

e vehicle que

he day when t

possible for an

queues acco

e delay migh

the provided

rrounding tra

Benicia does

ct team reco

on at-grade cr

pact would b

other traffic,

and traffic not

criteria consi

ject conflict w

l of service st

congestion m

ject result in

location that

oject substant

intersections)

uency and len

ject result in

oject

reased rail ac

curred on ve

at-grade railro

ity compared

ore, LOS dela

sings.

grade rail act

ty of the at-

ues are, the

traffic volume

n at-grade tra

ommodated w

ht be high d

d storage the

nsportation n

not have ad

mmends the

rossings:

e considered

such as que

t destined ove

idered as part

with an applic

tandards and

management a

a change in t

t result in sub

tially increase

) or incompat

ngth of train c

inadequate e

tivity on the

ehicles at an

oad crossings

to delay at in

y thresholds

tivity have a m

grade crossin

higher the av

es are high. H

ain crossing to

within the sto

during a lon

en it is less li

network.

opted signific

e following c

significant if

eue spillback

er the crossin

t of this study

cable congest

travel deman

agency for de

raffic pattern

stantial safety

traffic hazard

tible uses (e.g

crossings?

mergency acc

surrounding

intersection.

s have a highe

ntersections t

that apply t

major influenc

ng. Vehicle

verage delay

However, duri

o result in ave

orage capacit

ng train cro

ikely that the

cance criteria

riteria to eva

f rail crossing

to the freew

g is unable to

y include:

ion managem

nd measures,

esignated road

s, including e

y risks?

ds due to a d

g. farm equip

cess?

transportatio

. Generally,

er tolerance o

that are not i

to intersectio

ce on roadwa

queues and

becomes. T

ng times of th

erage delays

ty provided a

ssing, if resu

e at-grade tra

a for at-grade

aluate impac

g activity caus

way mainline

o continue alo

ment program

, or other sta

ds and highw

either an incre

design feature

pment), or du

on network. L

people that

of delay assoc

n the vicinity

ons are not r

ay and interse

delay are d

This is certain

he day when

in the LOS F

at the interse

ulting queue

ain crossing w

e railroad cro

ts associated

ses vehicle q

or to an adj

ong the trave

m, including bu

ndards estab

ways?

ease in traffic

e (e.g. sharp c

ue to the prop

7

LOS is

drive

ciated

of an

readily

ection

irectly

ly the

traffic

range

ection.

es are

would

ossing

d with

ueues

jacent

l way.

ut not

lished

levels

curves

posed


W

b

1.8

This repor

Chapter

criteria, an

Chapter 2

the proje

volumes,

a review o

Chapter

existing c

crossing.

Chapter 4

discusses


Would the Pro

icycle or pede

REPORT

rt is divided in

1 – Introduc

nd organizatio

2 – Existing

ect vicinity, in

and intersect

of reported in

3 – Existing

conditions as

4 – Cumulat

cumulative im


oject conflict

estrian facilitie

T ORGAN

nto four chap

ction discuss

on of the repo

Conditions d

ncluding the

ion operation

cidents at the

g Plus Projec

ssuming prop

tive Conditio

mpacts.

oject

with adopte

es, or otherwi

NIZATION

ters as descri

ses the study

ort.

describes the

surrounding

ns. Existing ra

e rail crossing

ct Condition

posed Projec

ons addresses

ed policies, p

ise decrease t

N

bed below:

y purpose, an

transportatio

g roadway n

ail crossing o

g and collision

ns presents r

t railcar deli

s year 2035 c

plans, or prog

the performa

nalysis scena

on facilities a

network, typic

operations are

ns at study int

relevant Proje

veries at the

conditions wit

grams regard

nce or safety

rios and met

nd existing tr

cal peak-hou

e also discuss

tersections.

ect informati

e at-grade P

thout and wi

ding public t

of such facilit

thods, signifi

raffic operatio

ur vehicular

sed in additio

on, and eva

Park Road ra

th the Projec

8

ransit,

ties?

cance

ons in

traffic

nal to

luates

ailroad

ct and


2.0

This chap

the study

2.1

The Valer

residentia

bounded

west and

2.2

Regional

Industrial

their locat

Interstate

County to

terminate

axis alon

Interchang

Park Roa

City of Be

the existi

Bayshore

Bayshore

along the

interchang

Industria

situated,


EXISTI

ter describes

intersections

PROJEC

ro Benicia Ref

al and comme

by I-680 and

to the north.

STUDY

access to the

Way, Baysho

tions in relatio

e 680 (I-680)

o the north, t

s in the City o

g the south

ges at Baysho

ad is a 2-lane

enicia to the i

ng Union Pa

Road. The po

e Road is a 2

e southeaste

ge with I-680

l Way is a 2

providing ac


ING CON

the transpor

.

CT LOCAT

finery is loca

ercial center

d Suisun Bay t

AREA RO

e Project site

ore Road and

on to the Proj

) is a north-s

traversing eas

of Fairfield, w

ern edge of

ore Road and

arterial that

ndustrial area

cific Railroad

osted speed li

-lane arterial

rn edge of

provides acc

2-lane arterial

cess to num

oject

NDITION

rtation system

TION

ted in an ind

of the city, a

to the south,

OADWAY

e is provided

Park Road. T

ject site are s

south freeway

stern Alamed

here it merge

f the Valero

Industrial Wa

connects the

as to the nort

d (UPRR) trac

mit varies fro

that connect

the City of

ess to and fro

l that loops t

erous industr

NS

m in the Proje

dustrial area o

as shown pre

East Channe

YS

primarily fro

The roadways

hown in Figu

y connecting

a County an

es into I-80. I-

Refinery, a

ay provide acc

e industrial po

theast. Its pa

ck at an at-g

m 30 to 35 m

ts the Valero

Benicia, follo

om the south.

through the

rial parcels e

ect study area

of Benicia, Ca

eviously on F

l Road to the

om I-680, wh

s in the study

ure 1-2.

Santa Clara

nd central Co

-680 is oriente

nd provides

cess to the so

ort area along

th largely par

grade railroad

mph.

o Benicia Refi

owing the S

. The posted s

industrial are

either directly

a and the exis

alifornia, nort

Figure 1-1. Th

e east, and Ea

hile local acce

y area are de

County in th

ntra Costa co

ed along a no

two lanes

outhern portio

g the southe

rallels that of

d crossing lo

nery to the i

uisun Bay sh

speed limit is

ea where the

y or via conn

sting operatio

theast of the

he site is gen

ast 2nd Streett

ess is provide

escribed below

he south to S

ounty. The fre

ortheast/sout

in each dire

ons of the ref

astern edge o

f I-680. It inte

ocated just ea

ndustrial port

horeline. A p

35 mph.

Valero Refin

nections with

9

ons of

main

nerally

to the

ed via

w and

Solano

eeway

hwest

ection.

finery.

of the

ersects

ast of

t area

partial

nery is

local


streets. A

40 mph.

Bay Vista

2.3

This sectio

2.3.1

Typical p

intersectio

Sidewalks

intersectio

2.3.2

Bicycle fac

B

B

p

B

ad

No desig

General P

2.4

Fairfield a

of Vacavil

Industrial

Road. Fro

route con

Way and


partial interc

a Court is a lo

EXISTIN

on describes t

PEDESTR

pedestrian fa

ons. The stud

s are not pr

ons—all unsig

BICYCLE

cilities include

ike paths (Cla

ike lanes (Cl

avement lege

ike routes (Cl

dditional pave

nated bicycle

lan, a future C

EXISTIN

and Suisun Tr

lle to the BA

Way, roughly

om here, the n

tinues via I-6

Bayshore Roa


change with I-

ocal street pro

NG PEDES

the existing p

RIAN FACILI

acilities inclu

dy area lacks

rovided alon

gnalized—fea

FACILITIES

e the followin

ass I) – Paved

ass II) – Lan

ends, and sign

ass III) – Desig

ement width

e facilities are

Class III bike r

NG TRAN

ansit (FAST) o

RT station in

y a quarter o

northbound r

80 to the Plea

ad. Headways

oject

-680 provides

oviding direct

STRIAN A

pedestrian and

ITIES

ude sidewalk

s substantial

g any of th

ture crosswal

g:

trails that are

nes on roadw

ns.

gnated roadw

for cyclists.

e provided w

route is plann

SIT SERV

operates an e

the City of W

of a mile east

route continu

asant Hill BAR

and fares are

s access to an

access to two

AND BICY

d bicycle facil

ks, crosswalk

pedestrian fa

he roads in

ks.

e separated fr

ways designa

ways for bicyc

within the stu

ned along Par

VICE

express interc

Walnut Creek

t of the at-gr

ues via I-680

RT Station; bo

e summarized

nd from the n

o industrial p

YCLE FACI

ities in the stu

ks, and ped

acilities, whic

the study a

om roadways

ated for use

cle use by sign

udy area. Ac

k Road south

city route—Ro

k. Route 40 h

rade Union P

to the City o

oth utilize the

d in Table 2-1

north. The po

arcels, from P

ILITIES

udy area.

destrian sign

h is typical o

area, and no

s.

e by bicycles

ns only; may

ccording to t

hwest of Indus

oute 40—that

has one stop

Pacific railroad

of Fairfield, an

I-680 interch

1.

osted speed li

Park Road.

nals at sign

of industrial

one of the

through str

or may not in

the City of B

strial Way.

t connects th

at Park Road

d crossing on

nd the southb

hanges at Indu

10

imit is

alized

areas.

study

riping,

nclude

Benicia

e City

d and

n Park

bound

ustrial


Hou

Standa

Nearest S

Source: FAST

2.5

The study

locomotiv

the termin

Francisco

the Benici

to Los Ang

The Valer

industrial

north of P

also serve

just south

and mast-

Train cros

crossing a

placed ad

2013. Th

railcars pe

summary


FAIRFIE

Agency

Route

rs of Operation

Headways

ard One-Way Fa

Stop to Project

T Transit Website

EXISTIN

y area is serv

ves across a n

nus for what

Bay Area. A

ia terminus vi

geles Union S

ro Benicia Ref

port area alo

Park Road. Th

es the industri

h of the Park R

-mounted flas

ssing counts

at the Iron W

djacent to the

he video data

er crossing, tim

of the video d


ELD AND SU

n

are

t Site P

e (Accessed Febr

NG FREIG

ved by the U

network that s

is commonly

railroad draw

ia the Port of

Station.

finery is serve

ong the south

is spur featur

ial areas north

Road at-grad

shing lights. T

were collecte

Workers Union

e at-grade cr

a was review

me of day for

data is provid

oject

TISUN TRANS

Week

Week

Varie

Park Road and

uary 2013)

GHT RAIL

Union Pacific

spans 23 state

referred to a

wbridge built

f Oakland to S

ed by a spur

heastern edge

es an at-grad

heast of the r

e railroad cro

The freight rai

ed at the Park

n Driveway jus

rossings for t

ed to determ

r each crossin

ded in Table 2

TABLE 2-1 SIT (FAST) TR

kdays

kends

es from $1.50 to

Industrial Way

Railroad (UP

es and 32,000

s the Overlan

in 1930 alon

San Jose, whe

off the Over

e of the City o

de crossing at

refinery. Switc

ossing. The P

il network thr

k Road at-gra

st 700 feet so

the week of

mine the num

ng, and the bl

2-2 and in Ap

RANSIT SERV

FAST

40

20-60 minutes

o $6.75, based

y (0.25 mile eas

PRR), which

0 miles of tra

nd Route, whi

ngside the Be

ere service co

rland Route m

of Benicia and

Park Road, e

ching activity

Park Road cro

rough the stu

ade intersect

outheast of P

Monday, Apr

mber of train

ockage time

ppendix A.

VICE SUMMA

5:30 – 93:30 – 8

No S

s

on distance tra

t of at-grade ra

operates a f

ck. The City o

ch connects C

enicia-Martine

ontinues as th

mainline that

d the refinery

east of Baysho

y between trac

ssing is contr

dy area is sho

tion in additio

Park Road. Vi

ril l5 through

crossings pe

at each at-gr

ARY

9:00 AM 8:00 PM

ervice

aveled

ailroad crossing

leet of over

of Benicia serv

Chicago to th

ez Bridge con

he UPRR Coas

runs betwee

y itself, termin

ore Road. The

cks typically o

rolled by two

own in Figure

on to the at-

ideo cameras

h Sunday, Ap

er day, numb

rade intersect

11

g)

8,000

ves as

he San

nnects

st Line

en the

nating

e spur

occurs

gates

e 1-2.

grade

s were

ril 21,

ber of

tion. A


Range of

Average C

Average C

Average N

Average N

Range of

Maximum

% of Cros

Average C

Average C

Average N

Average N

Range of

Maximum

% of Cros

Source: Fehr

As shown

compared

crossings

refinery an

of Park Ro

Valero ref

again to a

The major

on weekd

95 railcar


Crossings Per

Crossings Per D

Crossing Durat

Number of Rail

Number of Rail

Number of Ra

m Observed Cro

ssings With Du

Crossings Per D

Crossing Durat

Number of Rail

Number of Rail

Number of Ra

m Observed Cro

ssings With Du

r & Peers, 2013.

n in Table 2-

d to the Iron

at Park Road

nd tracks serv

oad and nort

finery, then e

access the oth

rity of train cr

ays and betw

rs during the


EXIS

Measure

Day

Day – Weekday

ion – Weekday

lcars Per Day –

lcars Per Crossi

ilcars Per Cross

ossing Duration

ration Under 5

Day – Weekend

ion – Weekend

lcars Per Day –

lcars Per Crossi

ilcars Per Cross

ossing Duration

ration Under 5

2, the numbe

n Workers U

d is because

ving other ind

h of the Iron

xit the refine

her industrial

rossings at bo

ween 12:00 PM

e weekdays w

oject

TSTING AT-GR

ys

ys

Weekdays

ing - Weekdays

sing - Weekday

n – Weekdays

Minutes – Wee

d

d

Weekend

ing - Weekend

sing - Weekend

n – Weekend

Minutes – Wee

er of train cro

nion Drivewa

the majority

dustrial areas

Workers Unio

ry, cross Park

areas northea

oth at-grade

M and 6:30 PM

were observe

TABLE 2-2 RADE RAIL O

Pa

s

ys

ekdays

d

ekend

ossings is hig

ay intersectio

of switching

northeast of

on Driveway.

k Road, perfo

ast of the refin

intersections

M on weekend

ed on Park

OPERATIONS

ark Road At-GCrossing

4 - 18

10

02:50

95

10

2 - 35

16:17

86%

7

01:42

45

7

2 - 18

05:56

92%

gher at the P

on. The reas

g activity betw

the refinery o

It is commo

rm the track

nery, and vice

occurred bet

ds. An avera

Road, with t

Grade IronDriv

Park Road at-

son for the

ween tracks

occur on the s

on for UPRR t

switching, an

e versa.

tween the 9:0

ge of 10 train

the average

n Workers Univeway At-Grad

Crossing

4 - 6

5

03:15

69

15

2 - 43

24:50

87%

5

00:18

40

8

2 - 18

03:21

100%

-grade interse

higher numb

serving the V

segment just

trains to acce

nd cross Park

00 AM and 7:3

n crossings to

crossing du

12

on de

ection

ber of

Valero

south

ss the

Road

30 PM

otaling

ration


estimated

less than

however a

17, 2013 a

Similarly,

minutes,

Wednesda

movemen

which blo

observed

Park Road

lower on w

In additio

Road for

Appendix

crossings

to switchi

crossing i

2.6

The Surfa

routes and

the interc

terminal i

accommo

Truck frei

Benicia R

Freeway s


d at 2 minute

5 minutes. Th

a maximum c

around 2:00 P

the majority

however a m

ay, April 17,

nts to disenga

ocks the Iron

maximum cr

d crossing. T

weekends com

on to the vide

the time pe

x A. The UP

across Park R

ing or train c

nformation to

EXISTIN

ce Transporta

d terminal ac

hanges at Bay

intersections

odate large tru

ght moveme

Refinery is loc

signs direct tra


s and 50 seco

he majority of

crossing durat

PM.

of train cros

maximum cro

2013 around

age railcars fro

Workers Un

rossing durat

he average n

mpared to we

eo count dat

riod between

PR data prov

Road. It is co

cutting activi

o perform the

NG TRUC

ation Assistan

cess routes.

yshore Road

of the interc

uck turning m

nt through B

cated, and in

affic destined

oject

onds. About

train crossing

tion was obse

ssings on the

ossing durat

d 2:00 PM.

om the locom

ion Driveway

ion is greate

number of tra

eekdays.

a, UPPR also

n January 4th

vides the deliv

mmon for a s

ty. Therefore

e transportatio

K ROUTE

nce Act (STAA

The entire len

and Industria

changes with

movements.

enicia is heav

n the industr

for these ind

86 percent o

gs on Park Ro

erved at 16 m

e Iron Worke

ion was obs

Some trains

motive and at

y for a substa

r at the Iron

ain crossings

provided anh and January

very schedule

single train de

, the video c

on impact ass

ES

A) designates

ngth of I-680

al Way provid

in the study

viest along th

rial port area

dustrial areas

of all crossing

oad had a dur

minutes and 1

ers Union Driv

served at 24

were observ

times trains w

antial period

Workers Un

and duratio

n estimate of

y 14th, 2013;

e but does n

elivery to cros

count data w

sessment for t

two types of

0 is a designat

de local access

area have b

he northern I-

a adjacent to

to use I-680 e

gs on Park Ro

ration typicall

7 seconds on

veway had a

minutes an

ved to perfor

would come t

of time and

nion Driveway

n of each cro

their delivery

the UPPR d

ot provide th

ss Park Road

was the prima

the Project.

f truck routes

ted national n

s to the refine

been designed

-680 corridor

o the Benicia

exits.

oad had a du

ly under 2 mi

n Wednesday,

a duration un

nd 50 second

rm back and

to a complete

d explains wh

y compared t

ossing is gen

y schedule at

ata is provid

he number of

multiple time

ary source of

s: national ne

network route

ery site. The r

d to appropr

r, where the V

a-Martinez B

13

ration

nutes,

, April

nder 2

ds on

forth

e stop,

hy the

to the

nerally

t Park

ded in

f train

es due

f train

etwork

e, and

ramp-

riately

Valero

Bridge.


2.7

The City o

According

arrive to s

contract w

staffed en

fire depar

types for

an averag

industrial

incidents

emergenc

City of Be

provided

2.8

The Fede

crossing.

the last th

which a t

Appendix

Collision

Highway P

study area

a total of

occurred

reported

between J


EXISTIN

of Benicia Fire

g to the Nati

structure fires

with the Solan

ngine to all e

rtment strives

90 percent of

ge response t

areas along

in 2012 with

cy response ti

enicia. The C

in Appendix

COLLIS

ral Railroad A

According to

hree years. T

train collided

x A.

history data

Patrol’s Statew

a is summariz

f nine collisio

within the v

in the vicinity

January 2009


NG EMER

e Department

ional Fire Pro

s within 5 min

no County Em

mergency me

s to reach the

f the total inc

time of 5 min

Park Road a

an average re

ime for the p

ity of Benicia

A.

SION HIST

Administratio

o the FRA, no

The last repor

with a truck

from January

wide Integrat

zed in Table 2

ons were rep

vicinity of the

y of the I-680

and January

oject

RGENCY V

recently prov

otection Asso

nutes of initial

mergency Med

edical calls w

e standard of

idents. In 201

nutes and 13

and Bayshore

esponse time

project study a

a Fire Departm

TORY

on (FRA) prov

train-vehicle

rted collision

k. The FRA

y 2009 throu

ed Traffic Rec

2-3, the data

ported within

e intersection

0 on-ramp in

2012 resulted

VEHICLE R

vided an eme

ociation (NFP

l dispatch. Th

dical Service A

ithin 7 minut

a seven minu

12, the fire de

seconds thro

e Road the fi

of 6 minutes

area was high

ment year 20

vided collisio

collisions we

at the Park R

collision hist

gh January 2

cords System

is also provid

n the study a

n of Park Ro

tersection wi

d in an injury o

RESPONS

ergency respo

PA) standard

he City of Ben

Authority to p

tes from the t

ute response

epartment res

oughout the

ire departme

s and 35 seco

her than the

12 emergenc

on history da

ere reported a

Road at-grade

tory data for

2012 was also

(SWITRS). Th

ded in Appen

area between

oad/Bayshore

th Bayshore

or fatality wit

SE TIMES

onse time ana

1710, fire de

nicia Fire Dep

provide an ad

time the stati

time to all e

sponded to 2

entire City o

ent responded

onds. Thus in

average resp

cy vehicle res

ta for the Pa

at the Park Ro

e crossing wa

the study a

o obtained f

he SWITRS co

ndix A. As sh

n 2009 and 2

e Road. Thr

Road. Neithe

thin the study

alysis for year

epartments s

partment also

dvance life su

ion is alerted

emergency inc

2,099 incident

of Benicia. Fo

d to a total

n 2012, the av

onse for the

ponse time d

ark Road at-

oad crossing w

as in April 19

rea is provid

from the Cali

ollision data fo

hown in Table

2012, six of

ree collisions

er of the coll

y area.

14

2012.

hould

has a

upport

. The

cident

s with

or the

of 27

verage

entire

data is

grade

within

995, in

ded in

fornia

or the

e 2-3,

which

were

lisions


ST

1. Park Ro

2. I-680 S

3. I-680 N

4. Park Ro

5. Park Ro

Source: Calif

2.9

Intersectio

between

weekday.

volumes c

Monday,

are show

generally

When this

been iden

collected

worst-cas

hours of a

PM and 6

from appr

AM peak

operation

operation

hours, the

Park Road


TUDY AREA C

Location

oad / Bayshore

SB On-Ramp / B

NB Off-Ramp /

oad / Bay Vista

oad / Valero Re

fornia Highway P

EXISTIN

on turning m

6:00 and 9:0

This peak p

collected at P

January 7, 20

n on Figure

occurs betwe

s study was in

ntified. To p

to determine

e scenario of

a typical wee

6:00 to 7:00 P

roximately 7:0

hour are con

s along eastb

s during the

e volumes we

d average dail


COLLISION H

n

Road

Bayshore Road

Bayshore Road

Court

efinery Drivewa

Patrol Statewide I

NG LANE

movement an

0 AM, when

period was id

Park Road jus

013 and Sund

2-1. As sh

een 7:15 and 8

nitiated the tim

rovide flexibi

e project imp

f potential Pro

kday, includin

M conditions

00 PM to 6:00

nsidered repre

bound Park Ro

PM peak pe

re estimated

ly traffic coun

oject

THISTORY SUM

Total Collisions

6

3

d 0

0

ay 0

Integrated Traffic

CONFIG

nd vehicle cla

traffic volum

dentified base

st west of the

day, January 1

own on Figu

8:15 AM, whic

me of day in

lity with the

pacts when t

oject impacts

ng the 9:00 to

, and the 9:00

0 AM. Further

esentative of

oad during th

eriod. Althoug

based on the

nts indicate th

TABLE 2-3 MMARY – JAN

s

CollisionInvolving

Pedestrian

0

0

0

0

0

c Records System

URATION

assification co

mes through

ed on an an

e refinery ent

13, 2013. Typ

ure 2-1, the

ch was also co

which the pro

traffic operat

raffic volume

. This study

o 10:00 AM h

0 to 10:00 PM

rmore, operat

operations d

he 9:00 to 10:0

gh weekday c

e average dail

he following a

NUARY 2009

ns g ns

CollisionInvolvingBicyclist

0

0

0

0

0

m, 2013.

NS AND T

ounts were c

the study ar

nalysis of sev

trance; these

pical weekday

peak hour f

onfirmed by t

oject train cro

tions analysis

es in the area

also assess o

hour to be rep

M hour, which

tions along w

uring the PM

00 AM hour a

counts were

ly traffic coun

about the non

9 THRU JANU

ns g ts

CollisionResultinin Injury

0

0

0

0

0

TRAFFIC V

collected on

ea generally

ven days of

counts were

y traffic volum

for typical w

the intersectio

ossings would

s, AM peak p

a are the hig

operational im

presentative o

h is represent

westbound Pa

M peak period

are considere

not collected

nts collected o

n-peak hours:

UARY 2012

ns g y

CollisioResultin

Fatalit

0

0

0

0

0

VOLUME

January 23,

peak on a t

roadway seg

collected bet

mes by time o

weekday cond

on counts.

d occur had n

period counts

ghest to pres

mpacts for off

of 9:00 AM to

tative of cond

rk Road durin

d (3:00 to 6:00

d representat

d for the non

on Park Road

15

ons g in ty

S

2013

typical

gment

tween

of day

ditions

ot yet

s were

sent a

f-peak

o 3:00

ditions

ng the

0 PM);

tive of

-peak

d. The


H

H

Thus, the

intersectio

Field reco

were docu

Existing in

shown on


Hourly volume

Hourly volume

reduction fac

on counts to e

onnaissance w

umented. The

ntersection la

Figure 2-2. C


es between 9:

es between 9:

ctors derived

estimate the n

was performe

ese were used

ane configura

Collected cou

oject

:00 and 10:00

:00 and 10:00

from the Pa

non-peak hou

d in which la

d to corrobor

ations, traffic

unt data is pro

0 AM are abou

0 PM are abou

rk Road daily

ur intersection

ane configura

rate satellite i

control, and

ovided in App

ut 41 percent

ut 91 percent

y counts were

n volumes.

ations, turn po

image observ

peak hour i

pendix A.

lower than th

lower than th

e applied to

ocket lengths

vations public

intersection t

he AM Peak h

he AM peak h

the AM peak

s, and speed

cly available o

traffic volume

16

hour

hour

k hour

limits

online.

es are

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd


Bayshore Rd

Bayshore Rd680

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

1

2

3

4

5

Figure 1-1.


Industrial Way

Industrial Way680

Average Weekday Traffic Volumes – Park Road

0

50

100

150

200

250

0:00

1:00

2:00

3:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

Vehi

cle

Coun

t

Time of Day

Peak Hour

4:00

8:00

2n

Westbound

Eastbound

Total

LEGEND




Study Intersection1


Figure 2-1.

Average Weekday Traffic Volumes by Time of Day – Park RoadWC13-3005_2-1_AvgTrafVol

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd


Bayshore Rd

Bayshore Rd

680

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

1

2

3

4

5

Figure 1-1.


680

Park RdBa

ysho

re R

d

41912

6340190

4 12 22

28 26 376

1

Park Rd

310

5121

0 4

4

I-680 On-Ramp

Bays

hore

Rd

183

31

22 430

2

Park Rd

Refin

ery E

ntran

ce(G

ate 4)

33384

3627221 1

5

Bays

hore

Rd

41746

31

35

3

I-680 Off-RampBa

y Vist

a Ct

2

MAP KEY

VOLUMES KEY


Study Intersection1


AM Peak HourTra�c Volumes

XX



Stop Sign

Figure 2-2.

Existing ConditionsIntersection Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane ConfigurationsWC13-3005_2-2_ExVol


2.10

The highe

which is t

intersectio

descriptio

peak hour

2.10.1

The traffic

simulation

and bicyc

intersectio

model req

volumes, a

2.10.2

During th

model ou

operation

(Volume

Administr

Li

Li

ve

Q

Based on

criterion, w

link volum


EXISTIN

est volumes t

the hour that

ons were eva

on of the traff

r LOS and que

MODEL A

c operations

n software tha

cles. The softw

ons, roundab

quires many

and vehicle b

MODEL V

e validation p

tput is within

s. The Fede

III – Guideli

ration, 2003).

ink volumes f

o For vo

o For vo

o For vo

ink volumes f

ersus count v

Queuing at bo

n our previou

which has a n

mes) than the


NG INTER

throughout t

t was selecte

aluated based

fic operations

euing results.

APPROACH

analysis for t

at analyzes th

ware can ana

outs, ramp m

components

ehavior chara

VALIDATIO

process, the V

n acceptable l

ral Highway

ines for App

or more than

lumes less th

lumes betwee

lumes greate

for more than

olumes) less t

ttlenecks mat

us experience

narrower tole

criteria sugge

oject

RSECTION

he day gene

ed for analysi

d on the HC

s model deve

H

the project ut

he traffic ope

alyze both art

meters, and at

. These com

acteristics.

N

VISSIM model

evels and the

Administrat

plying Traffic

85 percent o

an 700 vehicl

en 700 and 2,

r than 2,700,

n 85 percent

than 5

tch field obse

e, Fehr & Pe

rance for inte

ested by FHW

N OPERAT

rally occur du

is. Existing A

CM 2000 me

elopment and

tilized the VIS

rations of car

terial and fre

t-grade railro

ponents inclu

output is com

erefore presen

ion (FHWA)

Microsimula

of cases meet

es per hour (v

,700 vph, with

within 400 vp

of cases have

ervations

eers has dev

ersection and

WA.

TIONS

uring the AM

AM Peak Hou

ethod describ

d calibration

SSIM softwar

rs, trucks, tran

eeway corrido

oad crossings

ude lane geo

mpared again

nting a reaso

suggests th

ation Modelin

the following

vph), within 1

hin 15 percen

ph

e a GEH stati

veloped the

interchange

M peak hour

ur operations

bed in Chapt

process, in a

re platform. V

nsit vehicles,

ors, signalized

. The develop

ometries, traf

nst field data

nable approx

he following

ng Software,

g criteria:

100 vph

t

istic (measuri

following ad

volumes (wh

(7:15 to 8:15

s at the five

ter 1. Below

addition to th

VISSIM is a m

trains, pedest

d and unsign

pment of a V

ffic controls,

to determine

ximation of ex

validation c

Federal Hig

ng model vo

dditional valid

ich are aggre

19

5 AM),

study

w is a

he AM

micro-

trians,

alized

VISSIM

traffic

if the

xisting

criteria

ghway

lumes

dation

gated


Pe

Table 2-4

The mode

Catego

Link Volum

AggregateVolumes

Visual Inspection

Source: Fe

2.10.3

Existing A

previously

results are

analysis w

As shown

except fo

due to tur

The Existi

collected

morning p

and 7:30

crossings

approxim

crossings

seconds w

grade inte


eak-hour volu

4 shows the v

el meets the v

ory C

mes < 700

GEH S

d Interse

Queui

ehr & Peers, 2013

INTERSEC

AM Peak Hou

y described a

e summarized

worksheets are

, all study int

r the Northbo

rning movem

ng AM peak

at the Park

peak period b

PM on week

during the

ately 2 minu

were less tha

were observed

ersection that


umes at inters

validation res

validation crite

VALIDATI

Criteria

vph

Statistic

ections

ing

3

CTION OPE

r operations

and the lane

d in Table 2-

e provided in

tersections cu

ound I-680 ra

ents from the

hour analysi

Road at-grad

between 7:00

kdays and bet

weekdays we

utes and 50

an 5 minutes

d during the

t take longer

oject

sections withi

ults for the e

eria threshold

TON CRITERIA

Threshold

100 vph

5

5%

Match

ERATIONS R

at the five st

configuratio

-5 and the qu

Appendix B.

urrently opera

amp-termina

e ramp. Field o

is does not a

de intersectio

to 9:00 AM.

tween 12:00

ere observed

seconds. Of

in duration,

data collectio

than 5 minut

in 5 percent o

existing condi

ds.

TABLE 2-4 A THRESHOL

% Met T

> 85

> 85

100

h observations

RESULTS

tudy intersect

ons and traffi

ueuing results

.

ate at accepta

l intersection

observations

assume a trai

on crossing co

Generally, tra

PM and 6:30

on Park Ro

f the observe

however cro

on period. Ge

es to cross re

of traffic coun

itions VISSIM

LDS COMPAR

Target

5%

5%

0%

tions were ev

ic controls sh

s are summa

able service l

at Bayshore

confirmed th

n crossings d

onfirmed tha

ain crossings

0 PM on wee

oad, with the

ed crossings

ssing duratio

enerally, train

esult in LOS E

nts

models for t

RISON

AM Pea

% Met

100%

100%

100%

--

valuated base

hown on Fig

rized in Tabl

evels during

Road which

he calculated l

during the ho

at no trains c

occurred bet

ekends. An a

e average cro

on Park Ro

ons of up to 1

n crossings at

E or F operatio

the AM peak

ak Period

Pass/Fai

Pass

Pass

Pass

Pass

ed on the me

gure 2-2. The

e 2-6. Interse

the AM peak

operates at

levels of servi

our. Video c

crossed durin

tween the 9:0

average of 10

ossing durati

oad, 86 perce

16 minutes a

t the Park Roa

ons at the adj

20

hour.

il

ethods

e LOS

ection

k hour

LOS E

ce.

counts

ng the

00 AM

0 train

on of

ent of

nd 17

ad at-

jacent


intersectio

Therefore

part of th

vehicle qu

well.

EXIS

1. Park Ro

2. I-680 S

3. I-680 N

4. Park Ro

5. Park Ro

Notes: Bold1. AW

in2. In

Min

3. Thin

Source: Fehr


on of Park Ro

, LOS E or F o

he baseline co

ueues to build

STING INTER

Intersect

oad / Bayshore

SB On-Ramp / B

NB Off-Ramp /

oad / Bay Vista

oad / Valero Re

d denotes locatioWSC = all way sttersection. tersection level o

Manual (Transporttersection averag

he analysis presetersection delay r & Peers, 2013.


oad/Bayshore

operations at

ondition. The

d up and ext

RSECTION AM

tion

Road

Bayshore Road

Bayshore Road

Court

efinery Drivewa

ons where level oop controlled int

of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apnted in this tablewould be greate

oject

Road, regard

the Park Road

e longer the

end to adjace

TM PEAK HOU

A

Co

A

d

ay

of service threshotersection, SSSC

on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). e does not assumer than presented

dless of the tim

d/Bayshore R

train crossin

ent study inte

TABLE 2-5 UR LEVELS OFACTIVITY

ontrol1

AWSC

FREE

SSSC

SSSC

SSSC

old is exceeded. = side street sto

rsection control dr side-street stop

me a train crossind in this table wh

me of day in

Road intersect

g duration, t

ersections, th

F SERVICE W

Delay2

7

2

32 (36

1 (4)

1 (7)

op controlled inte

delay (in secondsp-controlled inter

ng during the AMhen existing rail c

which the tra

tion when rail

he higher the

hus affecting t

WITHOUT RAI

2,3

6)

ersection, Free =

s) according to thrsections, delay is

M peak hour. Exiscrossing activity o

ain crossing o

l activity occu

e probability

their operatio

L CROSSING

LOS

A

A

D (E)

A (A)

A (A)

uncontrolled

he Highway Capas reported as

ting average occurs.

21

occurs.

urs are

is for

ons as

acity


EXIS

1. Park Ro

2. I-680 S

3. I-680 N

4. Park Ro

5. Park Ro

Notes: Bold1. N

– 2. Th

woSource: Fehr


STING INTER

Intersecti

oad / Bayshore

SB On-Ramp / B

NB Off-Ramp /

oad / Bay Vista

oad / Valero Re

d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemhe analysis preseould be longer thr & Peers, 2013.


RSECTION AM

on

Road

Bayshore Road

Bayshore Road

Court

efinery Drivewa

ons where storagSB – southboun

ment. nted in this tablehan presented in

oject

TM PEAK HOU

Movem

NB-LT

NB-R

SB-LT

EB-LT

WB-L

WB-T

NB-L

d NB-T

EB-LR

NB-L

ay

SB-LR

EB-L

WB-T

e length is exceed, EB – eastboun

e does not assumn this table when

TABLE 2-6 R QUEUING

ent1 AvaStor

T

R

TR

TR

L

TR

L

T

R 1

R

R

L

TR

eded. nd, WB – westbou

me a train crossinexisting rail cros

WITHOUT R

ailable rage (ft)

Q

140

275

220

250

200

500

115

200

1,300

275

200

150

950

und, L – left turn

ng during the AMssing activity occ

RAIL CROSSIN

Average Queue Length

(ft)2

0

10

0

0

10

0

0

0

130

0

0

0

0

n movement, T –

M peak hour. Exiscurs.

NG ACTIVITY

MaximumQueue Len

(ft)2

60

90

70

20

190

80

0

0

550

0

40

0

0

through movem

ting queue lengt

22

Y

m gth

ment, R

ths


3.0

The propo

to 70,000

amount o

marine ve

crossing

Road/Bay

railcars in

the assum

3.1

The VISSI

weekday A

throughou

operation

therefore

of the Pro

U

le

A

Ty

U

A

A

For the pu

Road duri

network.

minutes t

second bu

delivery w

blockage


EXISTI

osed Project w

0 barrels per

of crude oil p

essels. Railca

the existing

shore Road.

length per de

mptions and a

PROJEC

M model dev

AM peak hou

ut a typical

s during this

assuming AM

oject assumpt

p to 100 rail

ength are exp

minimum he

ypical railcar l

p to 200 feet

verage travel

ll switching a

urposes of th

ing AM peak

A train with

to cross Park

uffer time be

would block t

time on Par


ING PLU

would expand

day, replacin

processed at

ar deliveries

at-grade rai

The deliverie

elivery, and u

nalysis results

CT ASSUM

veloped for Ex

ur. The AM p

weekday day

s time period

M peak hour c

ions for Existi

cars will be d

ected

eadway of one

length is 60 fe

of locomotiv

speed across

ctivity betwee

his study, a si

hour conditi

h 200 feet of

Road at a sp

efore and afte

traffic on Par

k Road due

oject

US PROJE

d the proport

ng quantities

the refinery.

are expected

lroad crossin

es would arri

p to 100 railc

s for traffic co

MPTIONS

xisting condit

peak hour was

y, thus the P

d. It is not

conditions pro

ng Plus Proje

delivered dail

e hour betwee

eet

ve is expected

s the Park Roa

en tracks will

ngle train cro

ons to determ

f locomotive

peed of 5 mp

er each train

rk Road for a

to the propo

ECT CON

tion of crude

currently rec

Currently th

d to use the

ng at Park R

ve at the ref

car deliveries a

onditions und

S

ions was used

s chosen as it

Project would

certain what

ovides a wors

ect conditions

y, however, s

en Project tra

d per train del

ad at-grade ra

occur within t

ossing of 50 r

mine potentia

and 50 railca

ph. The at-g

crossing on

approximately

osed project

NDITION

oil delivered

ceived by shi

e refinery rec

existing UPR

Road, just ea

finery each d

are expected

der Existing Pl

d to model a

t represents t

d likely have

t time period

st-case scenar

s:

single train d

ain deliveries i

ivery

ailroad crossi

the Valero ref

railcars in len

al impacts to

ars in length

grade crossing

Park Road.

y 8 minutes a

is lower than

NS

to the refine

ip, but would

ceives crude

RR track to a

ast of the in

day and utiliz

per day. This

us Project con

single train c

he worst-case

the greatest

ds trains will

rio analysis. B

deliveries of u

is assumed

ng is 5 mph

finery site no

ngth was assu

the surround

would take

g traffic cont

Therefore, ea

and 18 secon

n other existi

ery by railcar,

d not increas

oil via pipeli

access the ref

tersection of

ze trains up

s chapter disc

nditions.

crossing durin

e traffic opera

t impact to

cross Park

Below is a sum

up to 50 railc

rth of Park Ro

umed to cross

ding transpor

approximate

trols provide

ach 50-railcar

nds. The estim

ing observed

23

to up

se the

ine or

finery,

f Park

to 50

cusses

ng the

ations

traffic

Road;

mmary

cars in

oad

s Park

rtation

ely 7.3

a 30-

r train

mated

d train


crossings.

which is n

In additio

included t

Park Road

6:00 to 7

approxim

peak hou

operation

operation

3.2

3.2.1

Existing A

assuming

and the q

during the

of the fiv

affected b

crossings

Road sout

As shown

intersectio

the north

Bayshore

extend ab

observed

crossing a

60 vehicle

operation

at Park Ro


. The April 2

nearly double

on, a project i

the 9:00 to 10

d, this study a

:00 PM cond

ately 7:00 PM

r are conside

s along eastb

s during the P

INTERS

AM PEAK

AM peak hou

a 50-railcar t

queuing result

e AM peak ho

ve study inte

by the train c

is expected

th of Park Roa

n in Table 3

on at Industri

bound I-680

Road provide

bout 1,600 fee

to be about 4

at Park Road

es occupying

. Figure 3-1

oad assuming


2013 maximu

the blockage

impact analys

0:00 AM hour

assumes the 9

ditions, and t

M to 6:00 AM.

ered represen

bound Park Ro

PM peak peri

SECTION

K HOUR OP

ur and off-pe

train crossing

ts are summa

our is expecte

rsections. Th

crossings ass

to affect the

ad, and along

3-3, queuing

al Way. How

mainline from

es about 1,30

et under wors

460 vehicles a

would result

g approximat

1 shows the e

g Existing AM

oject

m observed t

e time of the t

sis was perfo

r and the 9:00

9:00 to 10:00

the 9:00 to 1

. Furthermore

ntative of op

oad during th

od.

OPERATI

PERATIONS

eak hour op

at Park Road

arized in Tabl

ed to increase

e intersectio

ociated with

operations a

g the northbo

along westb

ever, the 8.3

m the off-ram

0 feet of stor

st-case Projec

at the northbo

in queue spil

ely 1,600 fee

extent of the m

peak hour co

train crossing

train crossing

rmed for the

0 to 10:00 PM

AM hour to b

10:00 PM hou

e, operations

perations duri

he 9:00 to 10:0

IONS RES

RESULTS

erations at t

. The peak ho

le 3-3. As sh

e the delay an

n of Park Ro

the Project.

along Park Ro

und I-680 off

bound Park R

minute train c

mp at Bayshor

rage length an

t conditions.

ound off-ram

llback to the

et would arri

maximum que

onditions.

g duration wa

s due to the p

off-peak hou

M hour. Based

be representa

ur to be rep

along westbo

ing the PM p

00 AM hour a

SULTS

the five study

our LOS resul

hown in Table

nd result in LO

oad/Bay Vista

However, q

oad east of B

f-ramp to Bay

Road is not

crossing wou

re Road. The

nd the averag

The existing

p, thus it is ex

I-680 mainlin

ive at the in

eues expected

as 16 minute

project.

urs of a typic

d on the daily

ative of 9:00 A

presentative o

ound Park Ro

peak period

are considere

y intersection

lts are summa

e 3-1, a 50-ra

OS E or F con

a Court is no

ueuing from

Bayshore Roa

yshore Road.

expected to

ld result in qu

e northbound

ge queue alon

AM peak hou

xpected that

ne during the

ntersection du

d with the Pro

es and 17 sec

cal weekday,

y traffic volum

AM to 3:00 PM

of conditions

oad during th

(3:00 to 6:00

d representat

ns were eval

arized in Tabl

ailcar train cro

nditions at fou

ot expected

the Project’s

ad, along Bay

spill back t

ueues extend

d I-680 off-ram

ng off-ramp w

ur traffic coun

an 8.3 minute

peak hour as

uring the cro

oject train cro

24

conds,

which

mes on

M and

from

he AM

0 PM);

tive of

uated

le 3-1

ossing

ur out

to be

s train

yshore

to the

ing to

mp to

would

nt was

e train

s over

ossing

ossing


It is impo

during the

a worst-ca

along wes

peak perio

peak perio

3.2.2

The Existi

railcar tra

3-4. Thre

10:00 AM

the northb

to the Par

peak hou

crossings

PM period

extent of

AM peak

Traffic vo

morning

expected

its close p

resulting q

proposed

be contai

9:00 – 10:0

Generally,

result in L

time of da

Road inte

duration,

intersectio


rtant to note

e AM peak pe

ase scenario

stbound Park

od (3:00 – 6:0

od operations

OFF-PEA

ng off-peak h

in crossing at

ee out of the

hour. Vehic

bound I-680 o

rk Road/Valer

ur are similar

of durations

ds, the time o

the maximum

hour conditio

lumes in the

peak period.

to operate at

proximity to

queues would

50-railcar tra

ned within th

00 PM hour.

, train crossin

LOS E or F op

ay in which th

rsection when

the higher t

ons, thus affec


e that train cro

eriod. The AM

in the event

k Road during

00 PM). There

s specifically a

AK HOUR OP

hours of 9:00

t Park Road,

e five study in

le queues ass

off-ramp but

ro Refinery Dr

r to what dri

greater than

of train crossi

m queues exp

ons compared

evenings and

As shown in

t LOS A excep

the at-grade

d be no longe

ain crossing w

he provided i

ngs at the Par

erations at th

he train crossi

n rail activity o

the probabilit

cting their op

oject

ossings propo

M peak hour a

that trains cro

g the AM pea

efore, the AM

along westbo

PERATIONS

– 10:00 AM a

LOS results a

ntersections a

sociated with

not onto the

riveway but w

ivers under E

8 minutes alr

ng varies how

pected with t

d to Existing A

d late nights

n Table 3-2,

pt for Park Ro

railroad cros

er than 4 vehi

would block P

intersection s

rk Road at-gr

he adjacent in

ng occurs. Th

occurs are pa

ty is for veh

perations as w

osed by the P

analysis is pro

oss during th

ak hour are si

M peak hour a

ound Park Roa

S RESULTS

and 9:00 – 10

are presented

are expected

the 50-railca

I-680 mainlin

will not reach

Existing no P

ready occur ab

wever. Figure

the Project tra

AM off-peak h

are much lo

during the

oad/Bayshore

ssing. Althou

icles on eithe

Park Road for

storage capac

ade intersect

ntersection of

herefore, LOS

art of the base

icle queues

well.

Project are no

ovided for inf

he morning p

imilar to west

analysis is rep

ad.

0:00 PM were

d in Table 3-

to operate a

r crossing are

ne. Queues a

Industrial Wa

Project condit

bout once a d

e 3-1 provides

ain crossing a

hour conditio

ower within th

9:00 – 10:00

Road, which

ugh the inter

r approach of

r over 8 minu

city at Park R

ion that take

Park Road/B

E or F operat

eline conditio

to build up

ot expected t

formational p

peak hour. In

tbound volum

presentative o

e also evaluat

2 and queuin

at LOS E or F

e expected to

re also expec

ay. These resu

tions already

day between

s a graphical

at Park Road

ns.

he study area

0 PM hour al

would opera

rsection oper

f the intersect

tes, the resul

Road/Basyhor

longer than

ayshore Road

tions at the P

on. The longe

and extend

to cross Park

urposes to pr

addition, vo

mes during th

of the expecte

ted assuming

ng results in

F during the 9

o extend back

ted to extend

ults for the AM

y experience.

the 9:00 AM –

comparison o

assuming Ex

a compared t

ll intersection

ate at LOS F d

rates at LOS

tion. Althoug

ting queues w

e Road durin

5 minutes to

d, regardless o

ark Road/Bay

er the train cro

to adjacent

25

Road

resent

lumes

he PM

ed PM

a 50-

Table

9:00 –

k onto

d back

M off-

Train

– 7:30

of the

xisting

to the

ns are

due to

F, the

gh the

would

ng the

cross

of the

yshore

ossing

study


1. Park Roa

2. I-680 SB

3. I-680 NB

4. Park Roa

5. Park Roa

Notes: Bold1. AW

in2. In

Min

3. Th4. TiSource: Fehr

1. Park Roa

2. I-680 SB

3. I-680 NB

4. Park Roa

5. Park Roa

Notes: Bold1. AW

in2. In

Min

3. Tire

4. TiSource: Fehr


EXISTING

Location

ad / Bayshore R

On-Ramp / Ba

B Off-Ramp / B

ad / Bay Vista C

ad / Valero Refi



he No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.

EXISTING

Location

ad / Bayshore R

On-Ramp / Ba

B Off-Ramp / B

ad / Bay Vista C

ad / Valero Refi


Manual (Transporttersection averagme period repre

epresentative of tme period reprer & Peers, 2013.


PLUS PROJE

Road

ayshore Road

ayshore Road

Court

inery Driveway


of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apalysis scenario dosentative of the 3

PLUS PROJEC

Road

ayshore Road

ayshore Road

Court

inery Driveway


of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apsentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7

oject

TECT AM PEAK

Control1

AWSC

FREE

SSSC

SSSC

SSSC


on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p

TCT OFF-PEAK

Control1

AWSC

FREE

SSSC

SSSC

SSSC


on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). 9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A

TABLE 3-1 K HOUR INTE

No P

Delay2

7

2

32 (36)

1 (4)

1 (7)



a train crossing dpeak period alon

TABLE 3-2 K HOUR INTE

Existing Plus10:0

Delay2

103

36

67 (74)

1 (4)

14 (21)



PM period alongto 7:00 PM perio

AM time period a

ERSECTION L

Project3

LOS

A

A

D (E)

A (A)

A (A)

op controlled inte


during the AM peng westbound Pa

ERSECTION L

s Project 9:00 –00 AM3

LOS

F

E

F (F)

A (A)

B (C)

op controlled inte


g eastbound Parkods along westboalong westbound

LEVELS OF SE

Wi

Delay2

102

39

267 (302

1 (4)

47 (84)

ersection, Free =


eak hour. ark Road.

LEVELS OF SE

– Existing P1

Delay2

113

1

5 (5)

1 (1)

1 (5)

ersection, Free =


k Road. The timeound Park Road.d and eastbound

ERVICE

ith Project4

2 LOS

F

E

2) F (F)

A (A

) E (F)

uncontrolled


ERVICE

Plus Project 9:10:00 PM4

2 LOS

F

A

A (A

A (A

A (A

uncontrolled


e period is also

d Park Road.

26

S

)

A)

)

acity

00 –

S

A)

A)

A)

acity


Inters

1. Park RoBayshore

2. I-680 SRamp / BRoad

3. I-680 NRamp / BRoad

4. Park RoVista Cou

5. Park RoValero ReDriveway

Notes: Bold1. N

– 2. Th3. TiSource: Fehr


EXIS

section M

oad / Road

SB On-ayshore

NB Off-ayshore

oad / Bay urt

oad / efinery

d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemhe No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.


STING PLUS P

Movement1

NB-LT

NB-R

SB-LTR

EB-LTR

WB-L

WB-TR

NB-L

NB-T

EB-LR

NB-LR

SB-LR

EB-L

WB-TR


ment. alysis scenario dosentative of the 3

oject

PROJECT AM

Available Storage

(ft)

140

275

220

250

200

500

115

200

1,300

275

200

150

950


oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p

TABLE 3-3M PEAK HOUR

No Pr

Average Queue

Length (ft)

0

10

0

0

10

0

0

0

130

0

0

0

0



R INTERSECT

roject2

Maximum Queue

Length (ft)

60

90

70

20

190

80

0

0

550

0

40

0

0



TION QUEUIN

P

)

AverageQueue

Length (f

0

300

20

20

310

220

0

0

1,640

0

0

0

200

n movement, T –

eak hour. ark Road.

NG

Plus Project3

e

ft)

MaximQueue L

(ft

60

59

90

90

58

58

0

30

2,23

0

40

0

890

through movem

27

mum Length t)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

30

0

0

ment, R


Interse

1. Park RoBayshore



4. Park RoVista Cou


Notes: Bold1. N

– 2. Ti

re3. TiSource: Fehr


EXIS

ection Mo

oad / Road

S

E

W

SB On-ayshore

NB Off-ayshore

oad / Bay urt

oad / efinery

W

d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemme period repre



TING PLUS P

ovement1 AvS

NB-LT

NB-R

SB-LTR

EB-LTR

WB-L

WB-TR

NB-L

NB-T

EB-LR

NB-LR

SB-LR

EB-L

WB-TR


ment. sentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7

oject

PROJECT OFF

vailable Storage

(ft)

Ex

A

Le

140

275

220

250

200

500

115

200

1,300

275

200

150

950


9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A

TABLE 3-4F-PEAK HOUR

xisting Plus Pr10:00 A

Average Queue

ength (ft) Q

0

240

10

10

240

200

0

0

140

0

0

0

20



AM time period a

R INTERSECT

roject 9:00 – AM2

Maximum Queue Length

(ft)

70

560

80

40

530

530

0

0

570

0

30

0

180



TION QUEUIN

Existing P1

Average Queue

Length (ft

0

10

0

0

20

10

0

0

10

0

0

0

0

n movement, T –


NG

Plus Project 9:10:00 PM3

t)

MaximQueue L

(ft)

30

50

30

30

70

30

0

0

40

0

30

0

0

through movem

e period is also

d Park Road.

28

:00 –

mum Length )

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

ment, R

Park

Rd

Park

Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana StSprig

Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Park

Rd

Park

Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana StSprig

Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Bay Vista Ct

Bay Vista Ct Bayshore Rd

Bayshore Rd

6th

St

Elm St

McK

inne

y Pl

Elm St

McK

inne

y Pl

6th

St

680

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

1

2

3

4

5

2n

LEGEND



Study Intersection1

Existing Plus ProjectAM Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length

Existing Plus ProjectO�-Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length


Figure 3-1.

Existing Plus Project Queueing AnalysisWC13-3005_3-1_ExQueue


3.3

The follow

at-grade c

A

t

Impact 1

crude oil

northbou

deliveries

M

im

cr

w

th

no

el

From a q

because v

off-ramp

crossings

extend ba


EXISTIN

wing criteria w

crossings:

A Project imp

that impede

intersection a

– AM Peak

deliveries by

nd I-680 off-

by rail occur

Mitigation Me

mpacts associ

rossings durin

would result in

he northboun

ot cross durin

liminate or m

o Avoid

PM) a

o Insta

street

altern

o Sched

betw

ueuing persp

vehicle queue

from Bayshor

occur outsid

ack onto the I


NG PROJE

were applied

pact would b

other traffic,

and traffic not

Hour Queue

rail across Pa

-ramp to Bay

during the AM

easure 1: T

iated with the

ng the morni

n vehicle que

nd I-680 main

ng the AM pe

inimize poten

d to the exten

and the PM co

ll advanced w

ts to alert dr

nate routes

dule Project

een crossings

pective, the P

es that result f

re Road and

de the 6:00 –

-680 mainline

oject

ECT IMPA

to evaluate p

e considered

such as que

t destined ove

es Extend on

ark Road wou

yshore Road

M peak hour,

he Project ap

e increase in

ng peak perio

eues shorter i

nline. The Pro

eak period. I

ntial queuing

nt possible Pr

ommute peak

warning chan

ivers of the t

train crossin

s

roject would

from the train

eventually on

9:00 AM pe

e.

ACTS AND

potential impa

significant if

eue spillback

er the crossin

nto Northbou

ld result in ve

and eventua

resulting in a

pplicant shall

daily train cr

od (6:00 – 9:0

n length and

oject impact

In addition, th

impacts:

roject train cr

k period (3:00

geable messa

train crossing

gs on Park

impede othe

n crossing wo

nto the north

ak period, re

D MITIGA

acts associate

f rail crossing

to the freew

g is unable to

und I-680: T

ehicle queues

ally onto the

a significant

implement

rossings acro

00 AM) when

d duration tha

would be les

he following

rossings durin

0 – 6:00 PM)

age signs on

g on Park Roa

Road with a

er traffic duri

ould likely ext

bound I-680

esulting vehic

ATION M

ed with increa

g activity caus

way mainline

o continue alo

The proposed

s that would s

e northbound

impact.

measures to

ss Park Road

traffic volum

at would not

ss-than-signi

measures are

ng the lunch

I-680 and/o

ad and encou

minimum o

ng the morn

tend onto the

mainline. If t

cle queues ar

EASURES

ased rail activ

ses vehicle q

or to an adj

ong the trave

d increase of

spillback alon

d I-680 main

minimize qu

. Prohibiting

mes are the hi

extend back

ificant if trai

e recommend

hour (12:00 –

r appropriate

urage them t

one hour hea

ing AM peak

e northbound

the proposed

re not expect

30

S

vity on

ueues

jacent

l way.

f daily

ng the

line if

ueuing

g train

ighest

k onto

ns do

ded to

– 1:00

e local

to use

adway

k hour

I-680

d train

ted to


If the Proj

of the trac

intersectio

segment

The segm

left-turn l

Park Road

If the pro

side and e

Park Road

resulting q

Existing vi

one train

period. T

17 second

Proposed

increased

would inc

two trips

train cross

3.3.1

FAST ope

area; the

four buse

each direc

planned t

during the

It is likely

bus per h

attemptin

Project w

crossing d


ject train cros

cks would ext

ons. Queues

between the

ment of Park R

ane which w

d waiting for t

posed train c

east side of th

d/Bayshore R

queues would

ideo data col

a day that cr

he longest ob

ds, nearly do

project wou

crossing fre

crease the tra

out of the ref

sing duration

TRANSIT

rates one we

nearest bus s

s in each dire

ction during t

to occur duri

e AM peak pe

that Project t

hour travels a

ng to cross Pa

ould increase

duration of ea


sings occur d

tend back ont

on the east s

tracks and In

Road between

ill likely be u

the 8.3 minute

crossings occu

he tracks wou

Road would

d not extend b

lected at the

osses Park Ro

bserved existi

ouble the dur

uld increase t

quency is wi

ain frequency

finery) a day,

s that already

T IMPACTS

ekday transit

stop is locate

ection during

the PM comm

ng the AM p

eriod.

train crossing

along Park Ro

rk Road in th

e the train fr

ach Project tr

oject

during the 9:0

to Bayshore R

side of the tra

ndustrial Way

n the at-grade

tilized as a q

e train crossin

ur during the

uld not excee

operate at L

back and affe

Park Road at-

oad with a du

ng train cross

ration of a s

the frequency

thin the curr

on Park Roa

the proposed

y exist today w

route (Route

d at the inter

the AM comm

mute period b

peak period, t

s will occur d

oad in each

e event of a P

requency on

rain trip is low

0 AM – 7:00 P

Road and affe

acks would g

y, affecting ac

e railroad cros

queue storage

ng to clear.

7:00 PM – 6:

d the provide

LOS F condit

ect the operat

-grade railroa

uration over e

sing on Park R

ingle 50-railc

y of 8-minute

rent range of

d by four tra

d crossing du

without the P

e 40) along bo

rsection of Pa

mute period b

between 3:30

thus the Proj

uring the 3:30

direction dur

Project train c

Park Road b

wer than train

PM period, re

ect the operat

generally be c

ccess to and

ssing and Ind

e lane by som

:00 AM period

ed storage ca

tions during

tions of other

ad crossing in

eight minutes

Road was mea

car crossing

e crossings t

f crossing va

ain crossings

ration of eac

roject.

oth direction

ark Road/Ind

between 5:30

and 8:00 PM.

ject is not ex

0 to 8:00 PM

ring the PM

crossing are s

by four train

n crossing du

esulting queue

tions of the I-

contained wit

from Valero

dustrial Way p

me drivers st

d, resulting q

apacity. Only

the hour of

r study interse

ndicates that o

s within the 9

asured at abo

proposed by

that occur in

ariability. Alt

(two trips int

h Project trai

s of Park Roa

ustrial Way.

0 and 9:00 AM

. Project train

xpected to af

period. On a

period. The

mall, but pos

crossings a d

urations that a

es on the wes

680 ramp-ter

thin the Park

refinery drive

provides a two

uck on westb

queues on the

the intersect

the crossing

ections.

on average th

:00 AM to 7:0

out 16 minute

y the Project.

the area, bu

hough the P

to the refiner

n trip is lowe

ad within the

Route 40 pro

M, and five bu

n crossings ar

ffect transit s

average, abou

e chances of

sible. Althoug

day, the prop

already exist

31

st side

rminal

Road

eways.

o-way

bound

e west

ion of

g, but

here is

00 PM

es and

The

ut the

Project

ry and

r than

study

ovides

uses in

re not

ervice

ut one

buses

gh the

posed

today


without th

the Vacav

periods, t

increase in

40 during

3.4

The City o

emergenc

a total of

response

area was h

The same

parcels so

the indust

block thei

crossings

month of

Project. T

crossings

Although

trips into

Project tra

proposed

2012 eme

incidents

an emerg

Project wo

Park Road


he Project. In

ville Transpor

thus delay ex

n transit delay

the PM peak

EMERG

of Benicia Fire

cy incident typ

f 27 incident

time of 6 min

higher than th

e railroad trac

outh of Park R

trial parcels a

ir only access

that blocked

f April 2013,

Thus, worker

blocking the

the Project w

the refinery

ain trip is low

increased cro

ergency respo

a month occu

ency incident

ould cause th

d and Bayshor


n addition, Ro

rtation Center

xperienced b

y incurred by

k commute pe

GENCY VE

e Department

pes for 90 pe

ts along the

nutes and 35

he average re

ck that crosse

Road. The th

nd Bayshore

s point. Video

the driveway

which is abo

s within the

driveways we

would increase

and two trip

wer than train

ossing freque

onse data pro

urred along th

t occurring at

he average em

re Road indus

oject

oute 40 trave

r and the Wa

by Route 40

the Project is

eriod.

EHICLE AC

t strives to re

ercent of the t

industrial are

seconds. The

esponse for th

es Park Road

hree driveway

Road. Thus ex

o counts colle

y for as long

out three tim

three industr

ell over 8 min

e the train fre

s out of the

n crossing du

ency is within

ovided by th

he industrial a

t the same tim

mergency veh

strial areas.

ls along cong

alnut Creek B

buses is var

s within the d

CCESS

each the stan

total incident

eas of Park

e average em

he entire City

d at-grade als

s south of Pa

xisting train m

ected at the I

as 24 minute

es the durat

rial parcels so

utes.

equency withi

refinery) a d

urations that

the current ra

e fire depart

areas of Park

me as a Projec

hicle response

gested segme

BART Station

iable through

delay variabilit

dard of a sev

s. In 2012, th

Road and Ba

mergency resp

of Benicia.

so crosses th

ark Road are

movements w

Iron Workers

es and 50 sec

ion of the tr

outh of Park

in the study a

ay, the propo

already exist

ange of cross

tment, an ave

Road and Bay

ct train crossi

e time to inc

ents of I-80 a

during the w

hout each d

ty already exp

ven minute re

e fire departm

ayshore Road

ponse time fo

he driveways

the only acce

within the stud

Union Drivew

conds on a w

rain crossings

Road alread

area by four t

osed crossing

today withou

sing variability

erage of abo

yshore Road.

ing is low. It

rease to over

and I-680 bet

weekday com

ay. The pot

perienced by

esponse time

ment respond

d with an av

or the Project

of three indu

ess points bet

dy area tempo

way observed

weekday durin

s proposed b

dy experience

rain crossings

g duration of

ut the Projec

y. According t

ut two emer

The probabi

is unlikely th

r 7 minutes fo

32

tween

mmute

tential

Route

to all

ded to

verage

study

ustrial

tween

orarily

d train

ng the

by the

e train

s (two

f each

t. The

to the

gency

ility of

at the

or the


Impact 2:

crossing e

M

to

re

Im


: Emergency

events, resulti

Mitigation Me

o implement

egards to eme

Coord

event

provid

crossin

indust

The V

emerg

emerg

occurs

mplementatio


vehicle respo

ng in a poten

easure 2: Th

the followin

ergency vehic

inate with th

that an emer

e methods o

ng schedule

rial areas dur

Valero refiner

ency respon

encies within

s during the e

on of these me

oject

onse time to s

ntially significa

e Project App

ng measures

cle access:

he City of Be

rgency occurs

of adequately

and alternat

ing the event

ry provides a

se team sho

n the Park Ro

vent of a train

easures would

some portions

ant impact.

plicant shall w

to eliminate

nicia Fire De

s during a Pro

y informing t

e routes to

that a train c

an emergenc

ould be avail

oad and Bays

n crossing on

d reduce the

s of the study

work with em

e or minimiz

epartment to

oject train cro

the Fire Dep

access the P

crosses Park R

cy response

lable to assi

shore Road in

n Park Road.

impact to a le

y area would i

mergency resp

ze potential P

prepare an

ossing. The

partment of t

Park Road an

Road.

team on sit

st with respo

ndustrial area

ess-than-sign

increase durin

ponders in the

Project impa

action plan i

action plan s

the expected

nd Bayshore

te. The refi

onding to o

as if an emer

nificant level

33

ng rail

e area

cts in

in the

hould

train

Road

nery’s

ff-site

gency

l.


4.0

A Cumula

discusses

operation

4.1

The latest

year 2035

develop a

run and a

study area

collected

Park EIR.

have not i

overstate

model ne

indicates

the AM pe

Instead o

movemen

percent u

to 2006 a

have not

Therefore

assume fo

Cumulativ

In additio

PM were

the Cumu

estimate t

9:00 – 10:0


CUMU

ative conditio

the method

s models und

CUMUL

t version of th

5 volume fore

annual growth

nnual average

a was about 6

in January 20

Comparing

increased dur

future traffic

twork, such a

a significant

eak hour that

of applying m

nt, a 1.5 perce

sed in the Be

and 2013 cou

increased du

, to account f

or the study

ve conditions.

n, Cumulative

estimated by

ulative AM pe

the 9:00 – 10

00 PM foreca


ULATIVE

ns analysis w

dology used

der Cumulativ

LATIVE YE

he Solano-Na

ecasts for eac

h rates for th

e growth rate

6.6 percent fo

006 at the int

the 2013 cou

ring the seven

volumes. Se

as widening P

amount of cu

t may overstat

model-based

ent per year g

nicia Business

unt data colle

uring the sev

for the recent

area. Figure

.

e intersection

applying the

eak hour inte

0:00 AM inter

sts.

oject

CONDIT

as performed

to develop

ve No Project

EAR VOL

apa Travel De

ch of the stu

e study area.

es derived. Ac

or the AM pe

tersection of

unts to the 2

n year period,

everal unfund

Park Road to

ut-through tr

te future traff

growth rate

growth rate w

s Park EIR for

ected at the i

ven year per

t economic d

e 4-1 present

n forecasts for

e reduction fa

ersection fore

rsection forec

TIONS

d to identify p

p Cumulative

and Cumulat

UME FOR

mand Model

dy intersectio

Two scenar

ccording to th

eak hour. Feh

Park Road/Ba

2006 counts i

, indicating th

ded roadway

four lanes. A

raffic from I-6

fic volumes in

es to the ex

was applied.

the period b

ntersection o

iod, potentia

downturn, an

ts the weekd

r the off-peak

ctors derived

ecasts. A red

casts and a 9

potential imp

e conditions

tive Plus Proje

RECASTS

(STA Model)

ons. The STA

rio years of th

he STA mode

hr & Peers ob

ayshore Road

ndicates that

hat an annual

improvement

A review of th

680 and East

n the area.

xisting AM p

This rate is s

between 2006

of Park Road/

ally due to th

annual growt

day AM peak

k hours of 9:0

d from the exi

uction factor

percent fact

pacts in year 2

volume for

ect scenarios.

was initially

A Model out

he model, 20

l, the annual g

btained peak

d as part of th

t the total int

growth rate

ts are include

he 2030 STA

2nd Street on

peak hour in

similar to the

and 2030. H

/Bayshore Ro

he recent ec

th rate of 1.5

hour interse

00 – 10:00 AM

isting Park Ro

r of 59 perce

tor was applie

2035. This ch

ecasts and

utilized to de

puts were us

10 and 2030,

growth rate fo

hour traffic c

he Benicia Bu

tersection vo

of 6.6 percen

ed in the 203

model outpu

n Park Road w

ntersection tu

annual rate

However, acco

ad, traffic vo

onomic dow

% is reasona

ection forecas

M and 9:00 –

oad daily cou

ent was appli

ed to estimat

34

hapter

traffic

evelop

sed to

, were

or the

counts

usiness

lumes

nt may

0 STA

ut also

within

urning

of 1.6

ording

lumes

nturn.

ble to

sts for

10:00

nts to

ied to

te the

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Park

Rd

Park Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana St

Sprig Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd


Bayshore Rd

Bayshore Rd

680

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

1

2

3

4

5

Figure 1-1.


680

Park RdBa

ysho

re R

d

102020

8050250

10 20 30

40 30 500

1

Park Rd

4010

7030

10 10

4

I-680 On-Ramp

Bays

hore

Rd

250

40

30 570

2

Park Rd

Refin

ery E

ntran

ce(G

ate 4)

40510

5035030 10

5

Bays

hore

Rd

55060

40

50

3

I-680 Off-RampBa

y Vist

a Ct

2

MAP KEY

VOLUMES KEY


Study Intersection1


AM Peak HourTra�c Volumes

XX



Stop Sign

Figure 4-1.

Cumulative ConditionsIntersection Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane ConfigurationsWC13-3005_4-1_CumuVols


4.2

Standard

To meet

According

improvem

Pa

Ba

Pa

I-

I-

Although

for the im

Therefore

operation

for the Cu

are also sh

4.3

4.3.1

Cumulativ

and Plus

more deta

4-1 and th

for the no

during the

Road is ex

No Projec

increase t

intersectio

with the P


CUMUL

CEQA practic

this definitio

g to the City

ments are plan

ark Road wide

ayshore Road

ark Road/Bay

680/Bayshore

680/Bayshore

the above im

mprovements

, none of the

s analysis. Th

umulative con

hown on Figu

INTERS

AM PEAK

ve AM Peak H

Project cond

ailed Project

he queuing re

orthbound I-6

e AM peak ho

xpected to op

ct conditions

the delay and

on of Park Ro

Project. Howe


LATIVE YE

ce is to assum

on, a planned

of Benicia Ca

nned within th

ening to four

d extension fro

yshore Road in

e Road ramp-

e Road interch

mprovements

s has not ye

e improveme

he existing lan

ndition. The

ure 4-1.

SECTION

K HOUR OP

Hour operatio

itions. The Pl

assumptions

esults are sum

680 off-ramp t

our under Cum

perate at LOS

. Assuming a

d result in LO

oad/Bay Vista

ever, queuing

oject

EAR ROA

me future trans

d improveme

apital Improv

he study area:

lanes betwee

om Park Road

ntersection si

-terminal inte

hange improv

are listed in

et been secu

ents identified

ne configurati

e Cumulative

OPERATI

PERATIONS

ons at the five

us Project sc

are provided

mmarized in T

to Bayshore R

mulative No P

S F with queu

a 50-railcar t

OS E or F co

Court is not

g from the Pro

ADWAY N

sportation im

nt must be f

vement Progra

:

en Industrial W

d to Industria

gnalization

rsection signa

vements

the CIP, City

red and the

d above were

ions and traff

year lane co

IONS RES

RESULTS

e study interse

cenario assum

d in Chapter 3

Table 4-3. As

Road, are exp

Project condit

ues extending

train crossing

nditions at fo

expected to

oject’s train c

NETWORK

mprovements t

fully funded

am FY 2011-

Way and Sulp

l Way

alization

of Benicia sta

e timing of t

e assumed as

fic controls w

nfigurations

SULTS

ections were

mes a 50-railc

3. The LOS re

s shown in Ta

pected to ope

tions. The no

g onto the no

g during the

our out of th

be affected b

crossings is ex

K

that are reaso

by the Cum

16 (CIP) the

phur Springs C

aff have confi

their constru

s part of the

were assumed

and traffic co

evaluated as

car train cros

esults are sum

ble 4-1, all in

erate at accep

orthbound off

orthbound I-6

AM peak ho

he five study

by the train cr

xpected to aff

onably forese

mulative Year

following roa

Creek Bridge

irmed that fu

ction is unce

Cumulative

to remain in

ontrol assump

suming No P

sing at Park

mmarized in

ntersections, e

ptable service

f-ramp to Bay

680 mainline

our is expect

intersections

rossings assoc

fect the opera

36

eable.

2035.

adway

nding

ertain.

traffic

place

ptions

Project

Road,

Table

except

levels

yshore

under

ted to

s. The

ciated

ations


along Par

northbou

As shown

at Industr

680 main

railcar tra

the Projec

It is impo

during the

a worst-ca

along wes

peak perio

peak perio

4.3.2

The Cumu

50-railcar

4-4. Four

AM hour.

northbou

the Park R

compariso

assuming

Traffic vo

morning

expected

its close p

resulting q

proposed

be contai

9:00 – 10:0


rk Road east

nd I-680 off-r

in Table 4-3

rial Way unde

line from the

in crossing at

ct train crossin

rtant to note

e AM peak pe

ase scenario

stbound Park

od (3:00 – 6:0

od operations

OFF-PEA

ulative off-pe

train crossing

r out of the fiv

Vehicle que

nd I-680 off-r

Road/Valero R

on of the exte

Cumulative A

lumes in the

peak period.

to operate at

proximity to

queues would

50-railcar tra

ned within th

00 PM hour.


t of Bayshore

ramp to Baysh

3, queuing alo

er Cumulative

e off-ramp at

t Park Road.

ng at Park Ro

e that train cro

eriod. The AM

in the event

k Road during

00 PM). There

s specifically a

AK HOUR OP

ak hours of 9

g at Park Roa

ve study inter

eues associate

ramp but not

Refinery Drive

ent of the ma

AM peak hou

evenings and

As shown

t LOS A excep

the at-grade

d be no longe

ain crossing w

he provided i

oject

e Road, alon

hore Road.

ong westboun

Plus Project

Bayshore Ro

Figure 4-1 s

ad assuming

ossings propo

M peak hour a

that trains cro

g the AM pea

efore, the AM

along westbo

PERATIONS

9:00 – 10:00 A

d, LOS results

rsections are

ed with the 5

t onto the I-6

eway but will

aximum queu

r conditions c

d late nights

in Table 4-2

pt for Park Ro

railroad cros

er than 5 vehi

would block P

intersection s

ng Bayshore

nd Park Road

conditions. Q

oad are expec

shows the ex

Existing AM p

osed by the P

analysis is pro

oss during th

ak hour are si

M peak hour a

ound Park Roa

S RESULTS

AM and 9:00

s are presente

expected to o

50-railcar cros

680 mainline.

not reach Ind

ues expected

compared to C

are much lo

2, during the

oad/Bayshore

ssing. Althou

icles on eithe

Park Road for

storage capac

Road south

d is expected

Queues exten

cted to conti

xtent of the m

peak hour co

Project are no

ovided for inf

he morning p

imilar to west

analysis is rep

ad.

– 10:00 PM w

ed in Table 4

operate at LO

ssing are exp

Queues are a

dustrial Way.

with the Proj

Cumulative A

ower within th

9:00 – 10:00

Road, which

ugh the inter

r approach of

r over 8 minu

city at Park R

of Park Roa

to spill back

nding back to

nue to occur

maximum que

nditions.

ot expected t

formational p

peak hour. In

tbound volum

presentative o

were also eva

4-2 and queui

OS E or F durin

pected to exte

also expected

Figure 4-2 p

ject train cro

AM off-peak h

he study area

0 PM hour a

would opera

rsection oper

f the intersect

tes, the resul

Road/Basyhor

ad, and alon

to the interse

the northbou

r assuming th

eues expected

to cross Park

urposes to pr

addition, vo

mes during th

of the expecte

aluated assum

ng results in

ng the 9:00 –

end back ont

d to extend ba

rovides a gra

ssing at Park

hour condition

a compared t

ll intersection

ate at LOS F d

rates at LOS

tion. Althoug

ting queues w

e Road durin

37

g the

ection

und I-

he 50-

d with

Road

resent

lumes

he PM

ed PM

ming a

Table

10:00

to the

ack to

phical

Road

ns.

to the

ns are

due to

F, the

gh the

would

ng the


Generally,

result in L

time of da

Road inte

duration,

intersectio


, train crossin

LOS E or F op

ay in which th

rsection when

the higher t

ons, thus affec


ngs at the Par

erations at th

he train crossi

n rail activity o

the probabilit

cting their op

oject

rk Road at-gr

he adjacent in

ng occurs. Th

occurs are pa

ty is for veh

perations as w

ade intersect

ntersection of

herefore, LOS

art of the base

icle queues

well.

ion that take

Park Road/B

E or F operat

eline conditio

to build up

longer than

ayshore Road

tions at the P

on. The longe

and extend

5 minutes to

d, regardless o

ark Road/Bay

er the train cro

to adjacent

38

cross

of the

yshore

ossing

study


1. Park Roa

2. I-680 SB

3. I-680 NB

4. Park Roa

5. Park Roa

Notes: Bold1. AW

in2. In

Min

3. Th4. TiSource: Fehr

1. Park Roa

2. I-680 SB

3. I-680 NB

4. Park Roa

5. Park Roa

Notes: Bold1. AW

in2. In

Min

3. Tire

4. TiSource: Fehr


CUMULATIV

Location

ad / Bayshore R

On-Ramp / Ba

B Off-Ramp / B

ad / Bay Vista C

ad / Valero Refi



he No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.

CUMULATIV

Location

ad / Bayshore R

On-Ramp / Ba

B Off-Ramp / B

ad / Bay Vista C

ad / Valero Refi


Manual (Transporttersection averagme period repre



VE PLUS PRO

Road

ayshore Road

ayshore Road

Court

inery Driveway


of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apalysis scenario dosentative of the 3

VE PLUS PROJ

Road

ayshore Road

ayshore Road

Court

inery Driveway


of service based tation Research Bge (worst case apsentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7

oject

TJECT AM PEA

Control1

AWSC

FREE

SSSC

SSSC

SSSC


on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p

TJECT OFF-PEA

Control1

AWSC

FREE

SSSC

SSSC

SSSC


on average interBoard, 2000). Forpproach). 9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A

TABLE 4-1 AK HOUR IN

No P

Delay2

7

2

410 (484)

1 (5)

1 (8)




TABLE 4-2 AK HOUR IN

Cumulative9:00 – 1

Delay2

100

40

152 (170)

1 (4)

25 (44)




AM time period a

NTERSECTION

Project3

LOS

A

A

F (F)

A (A)

A (A)

Bold italics indiop controlled inte



NTERSECTION

e Plus Project 10:00 AM3

LOS

F

E

F (F)

A (A)

C (E)

op controlled inte



N LEVELS OF

Wi

Delay2

100

41

551 (645

1 (5)

76 (128)

cates potential sersection, Free =


eak hour. ark Road.

N LEVELS OF

Cumula9:00

Delay2

102

1

5 (6)

1 (1)

1 (4)

ersection, Free =



SERVICE

ith Project4

2 LOS

F

E

5) F (F)

A (A

8) F (F)

significant impactuncontrolled


SERVICE

tive Plus Proje0 – 10:00 PM4

2 LOS

F

A

A (A

A (A

A (A

uncontrolled


e period is also

d Park Road.

39

S

)

A)

)

t.

acity

ect

S

A)

A)

A)

acity


Interse

1. Park RoBayshore



4. Park RoBay Vista


Notes: Bold1. N

– 2. Th3. TiSource: Fehr


CUMU

ection Mo

oad / Road

N

S

E

W

SB On-ayshore

NB Off-ayshore

oad / Court

N

oad / efinery

S

W

d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemhe No Project aname period reprer & Peers, 2013.


ULATIVE PLUS

ovement1 ASt

NB-LT

NB-R

SB-LTR

EB-LTR

WB-L

WB-TR

NB-L

NB-T

EB-LR

NB-LR

SB-LR

EB-L

WB-TR


ment. alysis scenario dosentative of the 3

oject

S PROJECT A

Available torage (ft)

140

275

220

250

200

500

115

200

1,300

275

200

150

950


oes not assume a3:00 to 6:00 PM p

TABLE 4-3AM PEAK HO

No Pr

Average Queue

Length (ft)

0

10

0

0

10

0

0

0

2,910

0

0

0

0



UR INTERSEC

roject2

Maximum Queue

Length (ft)

70

110

70

60

200

130

0

0

3,060

30

50

0

20



CTION QUEU

P

)

AverageQueue

Length (f

0

340

30

20

370

170

0

10

2,930

0

10

0

400

n movement, T –

eak hour. ark Road.

UING

Plus Project3

e

ft)

MaximQueue L

(ft

60

60

16

11

58

58

0

40

3,06

30

60

0

1,36

through movem

40

mum Length t)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

60

0

0

60

ment, R


Interse

1. Park RoBayshore



4. Park RoBay Vista


Notes: Bold1. N

– 2. Ti

re3. TiSource: Fehr


CUMU

ection Mo

oad / Road

N

S

E

W

W

SB On-ayshore

NB Off-ayshore

E

oad / Court

N

oad / efinery

S

W

d denotes locatioB – northbound, right turn movemme period repre



LATIVE PLUS

vement1 ASt

NB-LT

NB-R

SB-LTR

EB-LTR

WB-L

WB-TR

NB-L

NB-T

EB-LR

NB-LR

SB-LR

EB-L

WB-TR


ment. sentative of the 9the 9:00 AM to 3sentative of the 7

oject

S PROJECT O

Available torage (ft)

C

140

275

220

250

200

500

115

200

1,300

275

200

150

950


9:00 AM to 7:00 :00 PM and 6:00 7:00 PM to 6:00 A

TABLE 4-4OFF-PEAK HO

Cumulative Pl– 10:0

Average Queue

Length (ft)

0

280

20

0

290

200

0

0

450

0

0

0

70



AM time period a

OUR INTERSE

us Project 9:000 AM2

Maximum Queue

Length (ft)

60

600

100

40

580

580

0

20

1,080

20

30

0

430



ECTION QUEU

00 Cumulativ

AverageQueue

Length (f

0

10

0

0

30

10

0

0

10

0

0

0

0

n movement, T –


UING

ve Plus Project10:00 PM3

e

ft)

MaximQueue L

(ft

30

50

30

30

100

40

0

0

50

0

30

0

0

through movem

e period is also

d Park Road.

41

t 9:00 –

mum Length t)

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

ment, R


4.4

MEASU

Impact 3

oil delive

northbou

deliveries

M

q

w

From a q

because v

off-ramp

crossings

extend ba

back to In

If the Proj

of the trac

intersectio

segment

periods, a

during the

6:00 PM),

under Cu

and Indus

by some d

If the pro

side and e

Park Road

resulting q

The Propo

increased


CUMUL

URES

– AM Peak H

ries by rail a

nd I-680 off-

by rail occur

Mitigation Me

ueues that w

would be less-

ueuing persp

vehicle queue

from Bayshor

occur outsid

ack onto the

ndustrial Way

ject train cros

cks would ext

ons. Queues

between the

affecting acce

e AM peak ho

thus it’s pos

mulative PM

strial Way pro

drivers stuck o

posed train c

east side of th

d/Bayshore R

queues would

osed project

crossing fre


LATIVE PR

Hour Queues

across Park R

-ramp to Bay

during the AM

easure 3: Im

would not ext

-than-signific

pective, the P

es that result f

re Road and

de the 6:00 –

I-680 mainlin

along westbo

sings occur d

tend back ont

on the east s

tracks and I

ess to and fro

our are consid

ssible that qu

peak period

ovides a two-

on westbound

crossings occu

he tracks wou

Road would

d not extend b

would increa

quency is wit

oject

ROJECT I

s Extend to N

Road would r

yshore Road

M peak hour,

mplementing

tend back on

cant if trains

roject would

from the train

eventually on

9:00 AM pe

ne. Vehicle qu

ound Park Ro

during the 9:0

to Bayshore R

side of the tra

Industrial Wa

om Valero ref

dered represe

ueues along w

conditions. T

way left-turn

d Park Road w

ur during the

uld not excee

operate at L

back and affe

ase the frequ

thin the exist

MPACTS

Northbound I

result in vehi

and eventua

resulting in a

Mitigation

nto the north

do not cross

impede othe

n crossing wo

nto the north

ak period, re

ueues on the

ad with the P

0 AM – 7:00 P

Road and affe

acks would g

y during the

finery drivewa

entative of op

westbound Pa

The segment

lane which w

waiting for the

7:00 PM – 6:

d the provide

LOS F condit

ect the operat

ency that 8-m

ting range o

AND MIT

I-680: The p

icle queues t

ally onto the

a significant

Measure 1 w

hbound I-680

during the AM

er traffic duri

ould likely ext

bound I-680

esulting vehic

e east side of

Project.

PM period, re

ect the operat

generally be c

9:00 AM to

ays. Operatio

perations duri

ark Road will

of Park Road

will likely be u

e 8.3 minute t

:00 AM period

ed storage ca

tions during

tions of other

minute cross

f crossing va

TIGATION

proposed incre

that would s

e northbound

impact.

would result

0 mainline. T

M peak perio

ng the morn

tend onto the

mainline. If t

cle queues ar

f the tracks w

esulting queue

tions of the I-

contained wit

3:00 PM and

ns along wes

ing the PM pe

extend back

d between th

utilized as a q

train crossing

d, resulting q

apacity. Only

the hour of

r study interse

ings occur in

ariability. Alt

N

ease of daily

pillback alon

d I-680 main

in shorter v

The Project im

d.

ing AM peak

e northbound

the proposed

re not expect

would likely e

es on the wes

680 ramp-ter

thin the Park

d 6:00 to 7:0

stbound Park

eak period (3

k to Industria

e railroad cro

queue storage

g to clear.

queues on the

the intersect

the crossing

ections.

n the area, bu

though the P

42

crude

ng the

line if

vehicle

mpact

k hour

I-680

d train

ted to

extend

st side

rminal

Road

00 PM

Road

:00 to

l Way

ossing

e lane

e west

ion of

g, but

ut the

Project


would inc

two trips

train cross


crease the tra

out of the ref

sing duration


ain frequency

finery) a day,

s that already

oject

on Park Roa

the proposed

y exist today w

d by four tra

d crossing du

without the P

ain crossings

ration of eac

roject.

(two trips int

h Project trai

to the refiner

n trip is lowe

43

ry and

r than

Park

Rd

Park

Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana StSprig

Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Park

Rd

Park

Rd

Bays

hore

Rd

Industrial Way

Indiana StSprig

Dr

Teal Dr

Mallard

Dr

Oregon St

Stone Rd

Bay Vista Ct

Bay Vista Ct Bayshore Rd

Bayshore Rd

6th

St

Elm St

McK

inne

y Pl

Elm St

McK

inne

y Pl

6th

St

680

680

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

VALEROBENICIA

REFINERY

1

2

3

4

5

2n

LEGEND



Study Intersection1

Existing Plus ProjectAM Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length

Existing Plus ProjectO�-Peak Hour MaximumQueue Length


Figure 4-2.

Cumulative Plus Project Queueing AnalysisWC13-3005_4-2_CumuQueue

APPEND

DIX A: EX

XISTING TTRAFFIC DDATA

Prepared by NDS/ATD

City: Benicia Project #: 13-7021-001Location: Park Road just west of Refinery Entrance (Day 1).StartTime Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon Morning Afternoon12:00 6 79 1 54 12:15 3 49 1 60 12:30 4 59 6 51 12:45 1 65 14 252 0 64 8 229 22 4811:00 5 47 2 55 1:15 3 59 3 22 1:30 1 81 1 47 1:45 3 13 12 200 3 14 9 138 21 3382:00 4 94 1 38 2:15 0 65 1 42 2:30 3 61 1 51 2:45 3 54 10 274 3 76 6 207 16 4813:00 6 61 2 62 3:15 3 51 5 68 3:30 11 52 3 67 3:45 6 92 26 256 2 95 12 292 38 5484:00 27 56 3 76 4:15 19 54 3 85 4:30 12 48 6 71 4:45 28 65 86 223 5 93 17 325 103 5485:00 35 36 24 67 5:15 25 36 16 89 5:30 37 33 16 63 5:45 47 49 144 154 14 68 70 287 214 4416:00 63 22 34 53 6:15 65 20 33 38 6:30 64 19 47 23 6:45 75 24 267 85 56 27 170 141 437 2267:00 86 16 65 20 7:15 104 7 43 9 7:30 106 6 63 11 7:45 92 5 388 34 62 7 233 47 621 818:00 106 6 72 6 8:15 102 8 43 12 8:30 88 10 70 9 8:45 75 6 371 30 51 5 236 32 607 629:00 88 8 56 6 9:15 61 3 45 9 9:30 50 5 54 7 9:45 67 10 266 26 42 6 197 28 463 54

10:00 57 5 33 5 10:15 61 11 48 12 10:30 73 8 36 4 10:45 44 2 235 26 53 2 170 23 405 4911:00 41 2 47 1 11:15 53 2 42 6 11:30 41 6 16 4 11:45 39 4 174 14 20 4 125 15 299 29Total 1993 1574 1993 1574 1253 1764 1253 1764 3246 3338

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:45 AMVol. 408 247

P.H.F. 0.962 0.858PM Peak 2:00 PM 3:45 PM

Vol. 274 327P.H.F. 0.729 0.861

Percentage 55.9% 44.1% 41.5% 58.5%

Volumes for: Monday, January 07, 2013

65843567 3567 3017 3017

Combined TotalsEastbound Hour Totals Westbound Hour Totals

Prepared by NDS/ATD


10:00 67 9 44 7 10:15 56 5 37 13 10:30 64 5 60 4 10:45 59 6 246 25 40 3 181 27 427 5211:00 31 1 42 0 11:15 45 5 33 8 11:30 51 3 56 2 11:45 48 1 175 10 62 1 193 11 368 21Total 2002 1715 2002 1715 1400 1922 1400 1922 3402 3637

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:45 AMVol. 417 255

P.H.F. 0.914 0.817PM Peak 12:15 PM 3:45 PM

Vol. 287 329P.H.F. 0.897 0.956

Percentage 53.9% 46.1% 42.1% 57.9%

Volumes for: Tuesday, January 08, 2013

70393717 3717 3322 3322


Prepared by NDS/ATD


10:00 53 9 53 2 10:15 54 9 50 7 10:30 41 6 41 3 10:45 51 3 199 27 41 5 185 17 384 4411:00 47 5 38 5 11:15 47 1 55 6 11:30 51 2 49 7 11:45 60 5 205 13 60 4 202 22 407 35Total 2025 1864 2025 1864 1417 1788 1417 1788 3442 3652

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 7:30 AM 7:45 AMVol. 435 269

P.H.F. 0.962 0.773PM Peak 12:30 PM 3:45 PM

Vol. 279 312P.H.F. 0.894 0.830

Percentage 52.1% 47.9% 44.2% 55.8%

Volumes for: Wednesday, January 09, 2013

70943889 3889 3205 3205


Prepared by NDS/ATD


10:00 51 5 49 5 10:15 52 10 42 11 10:30 41 7 37 8 10:45 47 3 191 25 39 5 167 29 358 5411:00 53 3 43 5 11:15 50 1 43 7 11:30 46 5 52 2 11:45 55 5 204 14 38 2 176 16 380 30Total 1970 1697 1970 1697 1331 1897 1331 1897 3301 3594

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:30 AMVol. 410 268

P.H.F. 0.949 0.838PM Peak 3:00 PM 4:00 PM

Vol. 280 357P.H.F. 0.761 0.790

Percentage 53.7% 46.3% 41.2% 58.8%

Volumes for: Thursday, January 10, 2013

68953667 3667 3228 3228


Prepared by NDS/ATD


10:00 30 3 11 10 10:15 73 6 31 11 10:30 39 4 41 4 10:45 41 3 183 16 40 2 123 27 306 4311:00 44 6 32 5 11:15 52 1 34 7 11:30 46 4 45 4 11:45 73 5 215 16 54 2 165 18 380 34Total 1969 1560 1969 1560 1258 1832 1258 1832 3227 3392

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:45 AMVol. 427 280

P.H.F. 0.882 0.729PM Peak 1:00 PM 3:45 PM

Vol. 309 319P.H.F. 0.920 0.822

Percentage 55.8% 44.2% 40.7% 59.3%

Volumes for: Friday, January 11, 2013

66193529 3529 3090 3090


Prepared by NDS/ATD


10:00 21 8 18 2 10:15 17 8 14 6 10:30 11 4 20 2 10:45 8 2 57 22 14 2 66 12 123 3411:00 17 5 17 3 11:15 15 1 18 3 11:30 10 3 13 1 11:45 15 1 57 10 27 4 75 11 132 21Total 585 480 585 480 487 529 487 529 1072 1009

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 6:45 AM 11:45 AMVol. 121 87

P.H.F. 0.890 0.806PM Peak 2:15 PM 3:00 PM

Vol. 98 92P.H.F. 0.907 0.852

Percentage 54.9% 45.1% 47.9% 52.1%

Volumes for: Saturday, January 12, 2013

20811065 1065 1016 1016


Prepared by NDS/ATD


10:00 4 4 4 1 10:15 7 2 3 7 10:30 4 2 8 6 10:45 4 0 19 8 6 1 21 15 40 2311:00 6 1 4 2 11:15 5 4 4 2 11:30 8 2 11 1 11:45 12 4 31 11 5 2 24 7 55 18Total 231 330 231 330 170 316 170 316 401 646

CombinedTotal

AM Peak 11:45 AM 11:30 AMVol. 43 31

P.H.F. 0.896 0.705PM Peak 2:00 PM 12:00 PM

Vol. 45 43P.H.F. 0.865 0.467

Percentage 41.2% 58.8% 35.0% 65.0%

Volumes for: Sunday, January 13, 2013

1047561 561 486 486


All Traffic Data(916) 771-8700

File Name : 13-7020-003 Bayshore-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1

City of BeniciaAll Vehicles on Unshifted tabHeavy Vehicles on Bank 1 tab

Groups Printed- Unshifted

Bayshore Road

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bayshore Road

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound

Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total

06:00 3 2 0 5 36 1 4 41 4 2 58 64 2 0 0 2 112

06:15 1 1 0 2 41 7 6 54 1 3 66 70 0 2 0 2 128

06:30 1 3 0 4 43 6 12 61 5 8 77 90 0 3 0 3 158

06:45 1 3 0 4 46 11 23 80 10 14 99 123 0 8 1 9 216

Total 6 9 0 15 166 25 45 236 20 27 300 347 2 13 1 16 614

07:00 1 2 4 7 39 5 6 50 5 5 101 111 3 2 0 5 173

07:15 4 6 1 11 32 5 15 52 7 8 104 119 2 3 2 7 189

07:30 6 1 2 9 49 9 24 82 2 5 77 84 0 3 2 5 180

07:45 5 3 1 9 62 15 18 95 11 9 104 124 2 6 2 10 238

Total 16 12 8 36 182 34 63 279 25 27 386 438 7 14 6 27 780

08:00 7 2 0 9 44 11 6 61 8 4 83 95 0 7 6 13 178

08:15 8 3 1 12 47 2 9 58 3 1 67 71 1 3 1 5 146

08:30 5 2 4 11 49 4 9 62 10 5 69 84 0 4 1 5 162

08:45 4 2 0 6 44 7 7 58 3 3 60 66 2 4 0 6 136

Total 24 9 5 38 184 24 31 239 24 13 279 316 3 18 8 29 622

Grand Total 46 30 13 89 532 83 139 754 69 67 965 1101 12 45 15 72 2016

Apprch % 51.7 33.7 14.6 70.6 11 18.4 6.3 6.1 87.6 16.7 62.5 20.8

Total % 2.3 1.5 0.6 4.4 26.4 4.1 6.9 37.4 3.4 3.3 47.9 54.6 0.6 2.2 0.7 3.6

Bayshore Road

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bayshore Road

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound


Peak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1

Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15

07:15 4 6 1 11 32 5 15 52 7 8 104 119 2 3 2 7 189

07:30 6 1 2 9 49 9 24 82 2 5 77 84 0 3 2 5 180

07:45 5 3 1 9 62 15 18 95 11 9 104 124 2 6 2 10 238

08:00 7 2 0 9 44 11 6 61 8 4 83 95 0 7 6 13 178

Total Volume 22 12 4 38 187 40 63 290 28 26 368 422 4 19 12 35 785

% App. Total 57.9 31.6 10.5 64.5 13.8 21.7 6.6 6.2 87.2 11.4 54.3 34.3

PHF .786 .500 .500 .864 .754 .667 .656 .763 .636 .722 .885 .851 .500 .679 .500 .673 .825




Bayshore Road

Park

Road P

ark R

oad

Bayshore Road

Right4

Thru12

Left22

InOut Total93 38 131

Rig

ht

63

Thru4

0

Left

187

Out

Tota

lIn

409

290

699

Left28

Thru26

Right368

Out TotalIn211 422 633

Left4

T

hru1

9

Rig

ht

12

Tota

lO

ut

In72

35

107

Peak Hour Begins at 07:15 Unshifted

Peak Hour Data

North




Groups Printed- Bank 1

Bayshore Road

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bayshore Road

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound


06:00 0 1 0 1 13 0 1 14 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 22

06:15 1 0 0 1 11 0 3 14 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 25

06:30 0 3 0 3 11 0 2 13 0 1 8 9 0 1 0 1 26

06:45 1 1 0 2 12 0 1 13 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 1 19

Total 2 5 0 7 47 0 7 54 0 2 27 29 0 2 0 2 92

07:00 0 1 0 1 13 0 1 14 0 1 14 15 0 0 0 0 30

07:15 0 3 0 3 4 0 2 6 0 3 5 8 0 0 0 0 17

07:30 0 1 0 1 7 2 1 10 0 2 4 6 0 0 2 2 19

07:45 2 1 0 3 19 0 0 19 0 1 7 8 0 1 2 3 33

Total 2 6 0 8 43 2 4 49 0 7 30 37 0 1 4 5 99

08:00 1 2 0 3 9 0 1 10 0 2 6 8 0 2 0 2 23

08:15 3 3 0 6 13 0 1 14 1 0 3 4 0 1 0 1 25

08:30 0 2 0 2 18 0 0 18 0 2 12 14 0 0 0 0 34

08:45 0 1 0 1 20 0 1 21 0 2 6 8 0 1 0 1 31

Total 4 8 0 12 60 0 3 63 1 6 27 34 0 4 0 4 113

Grand Total 8 19 0 27 150 2 14 166 1 15 84 100 0 7 4 11 304

Apprch % 29.6 70.4 0 90.4 1.2 8.4 1 15 84 0 63.6 36.4

Total % 2.6 6.2 0 8.9 49.3 0.7 4.6 54.6 0.3 4.9 27.6 32.9 0 2.3 1.3 3.6

Bayshore Road

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bayshore Road

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound




07:45 2 1 0 3 19 0 0 19 0 1 7 8 0 1 2 3 33

08:00 1 2 0 3 9 0 1 10 0 2 6 8 0 2 0 2 23

08:15 3 3 0 6 13 0 1 14 1 0 3 4 0 1 0 1 25

08:30 0 2 0 2 18 0 0 18 0 2 12 14 0 0 0 0 34

Total Volume 6 8 0 14 59 0 2 61 1 5 28 34 0 4 2 6 115

% App. Total 42.9 57.1 0 96.7 0 3.3 2.9 14.7 82.4 0 66.7 33.3

PHF .500 .667 .000 .583 .776 .000 .500 .803 .250 .625 .583 .607 .000 .500 .250 .500 .846




Bayshore Road

Park

Road P

ark R

oad

Bayshore Road

Right0

Thru8

Left6

InOut Total7 14 21

Rig

ht2

Thru0

Left59

Out

Tota

lIn

38

61

99

Left1

Thru5

Right28


Left0

T

hru

4

Rig

ht2

Tota

lO

ut

In1

6

7

Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 Bank 1

Peak Hour Data

North


File Name : 13-7020-002 Bayshore-I 680 SB On RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1


Groups Printed- UnshiftedBayshore Road

SouthboundDriveway

WestboundBayshore Road

NorthboundI-680 SB On-Ramp

EastboundStart Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. Total

06:00 0 9 30 39 0 0 0 0 2 64 0 66 0 0 0 0 10506:15 0 8 33 41 0 0 0 0 3 70 0 73 0 0 0 0 11406:30 0 11 36 47 0 0 0 0 3 93 0 96 0 0 0 0 14306:45 0 9 39 48 0 0 0 0 2 126 0 128 0 0 0 0 176Total 0 37 138 175 0 0 0 0 10 353 0 363 0 0 0 0 538

07:00 0 10 33 43 0 0 0 0 5 107 0 112 0 0 0 0 15507:15 0 5 36 41 0 0 0 0 4 122 0 126 0 0 0 0 16707:30 0 2 50 52 0 0 0 0 3 85 0 88 0 0 0 0 14007:45 0 19 51 70 0 0 1 1 7 125 0 132 0 0 0 0 203Total 0 36 170 206 0 0 1 1 19 439 0 458 0 0 0 0 665

08:00 0 4 47 51 2 1 0 3 8 97 2 107 0 0 0 0 16108:15 0 2 49 51 1 0 0 1 4 73 1 78 0 0 0 0 13008:30 1 9 43 53 0 0 0 0 4 82 2 88 0 0 0 0 14108:45 0 4 43 47 0 0 1 1 5 66 1 72 0 0 0 0 120Total 1 19 182 202 3 1 1 5 21 318 6 345 0 0 0 0 552

Grand Total 1 92 490 583 3 1 2 6 50 1110 6 1166 0 0 0 0 1755Apprch % 0.2 15.8 84 50 16.7 33.3 4.3 95.2 0.5 0 0 0

Total % 0.1 5.2 27.9 33.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 2.8 63.2 0.3 66.4 0 0 0 0

Bayshore RoadSouthbound

DrivewayWestbound

Bayshore RoadNorthbound

I-680 SB On-RampEastbound

Start Time Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Left Thru Right App. Total Int. TotalPeak Hour Analysis From 06:00 to 08:45 - Peak 1 of 1Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15

07:15 0 5 36 41 0 0 0 0 4 122 0 126 0 0 0 0 16707:30 0 2 50 52 0 0 0 0 3 85 0 88 0 0 0 0 14007:45 0 19 51 70 0 0 1 1 7 125 0 132 0 0 0 0 20308:00 0 4 47 51 2 1 0 3 8 97 2 107 0 0 0 0 161

Total Volume 0 30 184 214 2 1 1 4 22 429 2 453 0 0 0 0 671% App. Total 0 14 86 50 25 25 4.9 94.7 0.4 0 0 0

PHF .000 .395 .902 .764 .250 .250 .250 .333 .688 .858 .250 .858 .000 .000 .000 .000 .826




Bayshore Road

I-6

80 S

B O

n-R

am

p

Drive

way

Bayshore Road

Right184

Thru30

Left0


Rig

ht1

Thru1

Left2

Out

Tota

lIn

2

4

6

Left22

Thru429

Right2


Left0

T

hru

0

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In207

0

207


Peak Hour Data

North




Groups Printed- Bank 1Bayshore Road

SouthboundDriveway


NorthboundI-680 SB On-Ramp


06:00 0 1 13 14 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 2206:15 0 1 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 2106:30 0 0 13 13 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 2306:45 0 0 14 14 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 19Total 0 2 51 53 0 0 0 0 2 30 0 32 0 0 0 0 85

07:00 0 2 12 14 0 0 0 0 3 14 0 17 0 0 0 0 3107:15 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 3 8 0 11 0 0 0 0 1807:30 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 2007:45 0 2 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 29Total 0 4 50 54 0 0 0 0 7 37 0 44 0 0 0 0 98

08:00 0 2 10 12 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 2208:15 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 2108:30 0 2 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 3408:45 0 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 29Total 0 4 65 69 0 0 0 0 2 35 0 37 0 0 0 0 106

Grand Total 0 10 166 176 0 0 0 0 11 102 0 113 0 0 0 0 289Apprch % 0 5.7 94.3 0 0 0 9.7 90.3 0 0 0 0

Total % 0 3.5 57.4 60.9 0 0 0 0 3.8 35.3 0 39.1 0 0 0 0


DrivewayWestbound


I-680 SB On-RampEastbound


07:45 0 2 19 21 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 2908:00 0 2 10 12 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 10 0 0 0 0 2208:15 0 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 5 0 0 0 0 2108:30 0 2 17 19 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 34

Total Volume 0 6 62 68 0 0 0 0 2 36 0 38 0 0 0 0 106% App. Total 0 8.8 91.2 0 0 0 5.3 94.7 0 0 0 0

PHF .000 .750 .816 .810 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .600 .000 .633 .000 .000 .000 .000 .779




Bayshore Road

I-6

80 S

B O

n-R

am

p

Drive

way

Bayshore Road

Right62

Thru6

Left0


Rig

ht0

Thru0

Left0

Out

Tota

lIn

0

0

0

Left2

Thru36

Right0

Out TotalIn6 38 44

Left0

T

hru

0

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In64

0

64


Peak Hour Data

North


File Name : 13-7020-001 Bayshore-I 680 NB Off RampSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1


Groups Printed- UnshiftedBayshore Road

SouthboundDriveway


NorthboundI-680 NB Off-Ramp


06:00 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 65 0 7 72 8406:15 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 70 0 9 79 9106:30 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 91 0 9 100 11306:45 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 128 0 22 150 163Total 0 37 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 354 0 47 401 451

07:00 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 103 0 14 117 13207:15 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 119 0 11 130 14407:30 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 80 1 8 89 9907:45 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 125 2 16 143 168Total 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 29 427 3 49 479 543

08:00 1 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 94 0 11 105 12508:15 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 73 0 7 80 9208:30 1 8 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 73 1 8 82 10208:45 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 64 0 3 67 79Total 2 22 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 40 304 1 29 334 398

Grand Total 2 94 0 96 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 82 1085 4 125 1214 1392Apprch % 2.1 97.9 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 89.4 0.3 10.3

Total % 0.1 6.8 0 6.9 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 0 5.9 77.9 0.3 9 87.2


DrivewayWestbound


I-680 NB Off-RampEastbound


06:30 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 91 0 9 100 11306:45 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 128 0 22 150 16307:00 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 103 0 14 117 13207:15 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 119 0 11 130 144

Total Volume 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 441 0 56 497 552% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 88.7 0 11.3

PHF .000 .875 .000 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .625 .000 .625 .861 .000 .636 .828 .847




Bayshore Road

I-6

80 N

B O

ff-R

am

p

Drive

way

Bayshore Road

Right0

Thru35

Left0


Rig

ht0

Thru0

Left0

Out

Tota

lIn

0

0

0

Left0

Thru20

Right0


Left

441

Thru

0

Rig

ht

56

Tota

lO

ut

In0

497

497


Peak Hour Data

North




Groups Printed- Bank 1Bayshore Road

SouthboundDriveway


NorthboundI-680 NB Off-Ramp


06:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 806:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8 0 0 8 1106:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 806:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 7Total 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 30 0 0 30 34

07:00 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 12 0 0 12 1607:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 0 9 1107:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 0 0 8 907:45 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 6 9Total 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 35 0 0 35 45

08:00 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 1 10 1308:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 608:30 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 11 0 0 11 1408:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 6 0 0 6 8Total 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 31 0 1 32 41

Grand Total 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 96 0 1 97 120Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 99 0 1

Total % 0 7.5 0 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 11.7 0 11.7 80 0 0.8 80.8


DrivewayWestbound


I-680 NB Off-RampEastbound


07:00 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 12 0 0 12 1607:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 9 0 0 9 1107:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 0 0 8 907:45 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 6 9

Total Volume 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 35 0 0 35 45% App. Total 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 100 0 0

PHF .000 .500 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .750 .000 .750 .729 .000 .000 .729 .703




Bayshore Road

I-6

80 N

B O

ff-R

am

p

Drive

way

Bayshore Road

Right0

Thru4

Left0

InOut Total41 4 45

Rig

ht0

Thru0

Left0

Out

Tota

lIn

0

0

0

Left0

Thru6

Right0

Out TotalIn4 6 10

Left35

Thru

0

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In0

35

35


Peak Hour Data

North


File Name : 13-7020-004 Bay Vista-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1



Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bay Vista Court

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound


06:00 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 8

06:15 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 10

06:30 0 0 0 0 4 7 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 14

06:45 0 0 0 0 7 14 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 30

Total 0 0 0 0 12 34 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 62

07:00 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 13 0 0 1 1 0 4 0 4 18

07:15 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 20

07:30 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 15

07:45 0 0 0 0 9 15 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 38

Total 0 0 0 0 13 47 0 60 0 0 1 1 0 30 0 30 91

08:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 0 19 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 27

08:15 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 10

08:30 0 0 0 0 7 11 0 18 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 4 23

08:45 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 7 18

Total 0 0 0 0 17 37 0 54 1 0 4 5 0 19 0 19 78

Grand Total 0 0 0 0 42 118 0 160 1 0 5 6 0 65 0 65 231

Apprch % 0 0 0 26.2 73.8 0 16.7 0 83.3 0 100 0

Total % 0 0 0 0 18.2 51.1 0 69.3 0.4 0 2.2 2.6 0 28.1 0 28.1

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bay Vista Court

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound




07:15 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 20

07:30 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 15

07:45 0 0 0 0 9 15 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 38

08:00 0 0 0 0 8 11 0 19 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 27

Total Volume 0 0 0 0 19 47 0 66 0 0 4 4 0 30 0 30 100

% App. Total 0 0 0 28.8 71.2 0 0 0 100 0 100 0

PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .528 .783 .000 .688 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .536 .000 .536 .658




Park

Road P

ark R

oad

Bay Vista Court

Right0

Thru0

Left0

InOut Total0 0 0

Rig

ht0

Thru4

7

Left19

Out

Tota

lIn

34

66

100

Left0

Thru0

Right4

Out TotalIn19 4 23

Left0

T

hru3

0

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In47

30

77


Peak Hour Data

North





Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bay Vista Court

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound


06:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2

06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3

07:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4

07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3

Total 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 7

08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

08:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2

08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

Total 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 5

Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 0 1 2 0 10 0 10 15

Apprch % 0 0 0 0 100 0 50 0 50 0 100 0

Total % 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 6.7 0 6.7 13.3 0 66.7 0 66.7

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound

Bay Vista Court

Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound




07:30 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 4

07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3

08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1

08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1

Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 6 0 6 9

% App. Total 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 100 0

PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .250 .000 .000 .250 .250 .000 .500 .000 .500 .563




Park

Road P

ark R

oad

Bay Vista Court

Right0

Thru0

Left0

InOut Total0 0 0

Rig

ht0

Thru2

Left0

Out

Tota

lIn

7

2

9

Left0

Thru0

Right1

Out TotalIn0 1 1

Left0

T

hru

6

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In2

6

8


Peak Hour Data

North


File Name : 13-7020-005 Valero Refinery-ParkSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 1/23/2013Page No : 1



Valero Refinery Entrance

Southbound

Park Road

Westbound Northbound

Park Road

Eastbound


06:00 1 0 0 1 0 38 1 39 0 0 0 0 5 56 0 61 101

06:15 2 0 0 2 0 51 7 58 0 0 0 0 10 57 0 67 127

06:30 0 0 6 6 0 54 8 62 0 0 0 0 9 75 0 84 152

06:45 0 0 3 3 0 78 4 82 0 0 0 0 2 103 0 105 190

Total 3 0 9 12 0 221 20 241 0 0 0 0 26 291 0 317 570

07:00 0 0 2 2 0 48 8 56 0 0 0 0 12 90 0 102 160

07:15 0 0 5 5 0 45 16 61 0 0 0 0 25 89 0 114 180

07:30 1 0 9 10 0 75 17 92 0 0 0 0 8 80 0 88 190

07:45 0 0 7 7 0 88 3 91 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 114 212

Total 1 0 23 24 0 256 44 300 0 0 0 0 45 373 0 418 742

08:00 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 101 162

08:15 0 0 1 1 0 58 3 61 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 79 141

08:30 1 0 1 2 0 61 1 62 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 81 145

08:45 0 0 0 0 0 60 1 61 0 0 0 0 0 65 0 65 126

Total 1 0 2 3 0 240 5 245 0 0 0 0 0 326 0 326 574

Grand Total 5 0 34 39 0 717 69 786 0 0 0 0 71 990 0 1061 1886

Apprch % 12.8 0 87.2 0 91.2 8.8 0 0 0 6.7 93.3 0

Total % 0.3 0 1.8 2.1 0 38 3.7 41.7 0 0 0 0 3.8 52.5 0 56.3


Southbound

Park Road


Park Road

Eastbound




07:15 0 0 5 5 0 45 16 61 0 0 0 0 25 89 0 114 180

07:30 1 0 9 10 0 75 17 92 0 0 0 0 8 80 0 88 190

07:45 0 0 7 7 0 88 3 91 0 0 0 0 0 114 0 114 212

08:00 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 61 0 0 0 0 0 101 0 101 162

Total Volume 1 0 21 22 0 269 36 305 0 0 0 0 33 384 0 417 744

% App. Total 4.5 0 95.5 0 88.2 11.8 0 0 0 7.9 92.1 0

PHF .250 .000 .583 .550 .000 .764 .529 .829 .000 .000 .000 .000 .330 .842 .000 .914 .877





Park

Road P

ark R

oad

Right21

Thru0

Left1

InOut Total69 22 91

Rig

ht

36

Thru

269

Left0

Out

Tota

lIn

385

305

690

Left0

Thru0

Right0

Out TotalIn0 0 0

Left33

Thru

384

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In290

417

707


Peak Hour Data

North






Southbound

Park Road


Park Road

Eastbound


06:00 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 23

06:15 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 16 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 26

06:30 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 21

06:45 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 16

Total 0 0 0 0 0 54 1 55 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 31 86

07:00 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 16 30

07:15 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 11

07:30 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 13

07:45 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 26

Total 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 33 80

08:00 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 19

08:15 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 16

08:30 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 32

08:45 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 31

Total 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 98

Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 164 2 166 0 0 0 0 0 98 0 98 264

Apprch % 0 0 0 0 98.8 1.2 0 0 0 0 100 0

Total % 0 0 0 0 0 62.1 0.8 62.9 0 0 0 0 0 37.1 0 37.1


Southbound

Park Road


Park Road

Eastbound




08:00 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 19

08:15 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 16

08:30 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 14 32

08:45 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 31

Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 63 1 64 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 34 98

% App. Total 0 0 0 0 98.4 1.6 0 0 0 0 100 0

PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .685 .250 .696 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .607 .000 .607 .766





Park

Road P

ark R

oad

Right0

Thru0

Left0

InOut Total1 0 1

Rig

ht1

Thru6

3

Left0

Out

Tota

lIn

34

64

98

Left0

Thru0

Right0

Out TotalIn0 0 0

Left0

T

hru3

4

Rig

ht0

Tota

lO

ut

In63

34

97


Peak Hour Data

North

Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionLeft or Right

Track?Moving Back and Forth?

Crossing Duration

Train # Start Time End Time # of Cars DirectionMoving Back and Forth?

Crossing Duration

1 10:43:30 10:44:20 2 NB Right No 0:00:50 1 10:40:54 10:41:10 2 NB No 0:00:162 10:53:20 10:54:45 5 NB Right No 0:01:25 2 14:24:26 14:25:09 9 SB No 0:00:433 10:55:46 10:57:16 5 SB Left No 0:01:30 3 18:49:50 18:50:35 9 NB No 0:00:454 11:48:34 11:50:23 11 SB Left No 0:01:49 4 19:15:51 19:16:31 9 SB No 0:00:405 11:54:01 11:56:02 11 NB Right No 0:02:016 12:15:31 12:16:25 2 SB Right No 0:00:547 12:17:51 12:18:44 2 NB Left No 0:00:538 12:29:48 12:31:41 7 SB Left No 0:01:539 12:32:37 12:34:05 7 NB Right No 0:01:2810 13:10:10 13:12:16 7 SB Right No 0:02:0611 13:14:00 13:16:40 7 NB Left No 0:02:4012 13:43:23 13:44:30 2 SB Left No 0:01:0713 13:46:11 13:47:05 2 NB Right No 0:00:5414 14:20:28 14:25:12 9 SB Right No 0:04:4415 18:51:44 18:53:46 9 NB Left No 0:02:0216 19:08:07 19:08:48 2 SB Left No 0:00:4117 19:09:17 19:10:10 2 NB Right No 0:00:5318 19:15:00 19:16:35 9 SB Right No 0:01:35

Park Road Crossing Iron Workers Union Driveway Crossing

13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyMonday, April 15, 2013



Crossing Duration


Crossing Duration

1 13:14:15 13:26:06 16 NB Right No 0:11:51 1 13:05:10 13:22:48 16 NB No 0:17:382 17:20:01 17:21:30 2 SB to NB Right to Left Yes 0:01:29 2 17:37:38 17:38:18 10 SB No 0:00:403 17:37:07 17:38:20 10 SB Left No 0:01:13 3 18:11:30 18:12:08 10 NB No 0:00:384 18:12:31 18:13:57 10 NB Left No 0:01:26 4 18:36:35 18:38:32 5 SB to NB Yes 0:01:575 18:22:18 18:24:19 3 SB to NB Left to Right Yes 0:02:01 5 18:48:21 18:50:52 35 SB No 0:02:316 18:32:09 18:40:05 18 SB to NB Right Yes 0:07:567 18:47:35 18:50:59 35 SB Right No 0:03:24


13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyTuesday, April 16, 2013



Crossing Duration


Crossing Duration

1 13:51:08 14:07:25 31 NB to SB Right Yes 0:16:17 1 13:48:48 14:13:38 43 NB Yes 0:24:502 14:09:55 14:18:35 31 NB Right No 0:08:40 2 17:36:02 17:36:42 9 SB No 0:00:403 16:51:33 16:53:17 4 SB Right No 0:01:44 3 18:14:19 18:14:57 9 NB No 0:00:384 16:54:06 16:55:26 4 NB Left No 0:01:20 4 18:36:15 18:37:41 20 SB No 0:01:265 17:34:04 17:35:20 9 SB Left No 0:01:166 18:14:07 18:15:25 9 NB Left No 0:01:187 18:25:07 18:26:06 2 SB Left No 0:00:598 18:26:25 18:27:24 2 NB Right No 0:00:599 18:34:10 18:36:18 20 SB Right No 0:02:08


13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyWednesday, April 17, 2013



Crossing Duration


Crossing Duration

1 11:20:15 11:24:30 26 NB Right No 0:04:15 1 6:30:49 6:34:56 26 NB Yes 0:04:072 13:51:10 13:59:32 16+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:08:22 2 11:15:35 11:22:37 26 NB No 0:07:02

3 13:53:54 13:55:30 3+ SB to NB Yes 0:01:364 17:18:39 17:19:20 10 SB No 0:00:41

missing video from 1627 to 2400 5 17:57:36 17:58:11 9 NB No 0:00:356 18:22:04 18:24:14 26 SB No 0:02:10


13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyThursday, April 18, 2013



Crossing Duration


Crossing Duration

1 9:29:07 9:30:37 2 NB Right No 0:01:30 1 9:27:51 9:28:06 2 NB No 0:00:152 10:19:03 10:21:08 2 SB to NB Right to Left Yes 0:02:05 2 10:43:33 10:44:16 10 SB No 0:00:433 10:43:04 10:43:44 10 SB Left No 0:00:40 3 12:17:56 12:20:22 24 NB No 0:02:264 12:19:38 12:27:55 24 NB Right to Left Yes 0:08:17 4 14:15:06 14:16:57 25 SB No 0:01:515 12:42:57 12:43:52 2 SB Left No 0:00:556 12:44:25 12:45:23 2 NB Right No 0:00:587 12:48:29 12:52:10 9+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:03:418 14:00:14 14:01:38 3+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:01:249 14:10:07 14:16:52 25 SB Right No 0:06:45

missing video from 0000 to 0603


13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudyFriday, April 19, 2013



Crossing Duration


Crossing Duration

1 12:54:10 13:00:06 16 NB Right No 0:05:56 1 12:52:53 12:54:22 16 NB No 0:01:292 17:10:32 17:11:58 10 SB Left No 0:01:26 2 17:11:38 17:12:17 10 SB No 0:00:393 17:51:43 17:52:58 9 NB Left No 0:01:15 3 17:50:37 17:51:10 9 NB No 0:00:334 18:03:01 18:03:59 2 SB Left No 0:00:58 4 18:03:51 18:04:06 2 SB No 0:00:15


13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudySaturday, April 20, 2013



Crossing Duration


Crossing Duration

1 12:17:58 12:19:52 18 NB Right No 0:01:54 1 12:16:05 12:19:26 18 NB No 0:03:212 13:36:26 13:37:20 2 SB Right No 0:00:54 2 14:06:44 14:07:15 9 SB No 0:00:313 13:38:02 13:38:56 2 NB Left No 0:00:54 3 14:54:32 14:55:05 9 NB No 0:00:334 14:04:05 14:05:32 9 SB Left No 0:01:27 4 15:08:55 15:09:08 2 SB No 0:00:135 14:54:03 14:55:45 9 NB Right No 0:01:42 5 17:34:40 17:34:53 2 NB No 0:00:136 15:06:29 15:07:28 2 SB Left No 0:00:59 6 18:02:28 18:02:40 2 SB No 0:00:127 17:35:25 17:37:05 2 NB Right No 0:01:408 17:55:24 17:57:36 6+ SB to NB Right Yes 0:02:129 18:00:02 18:00:55 2 SB Right No 0:00:53


13‐7217 Benicia Train Crossing StudySunday, April 21, 2013

UPPR DATA ‐ Delivery Schedule EstimatePark Road Rail Crossing ‐‐‐ Estimate only based on partial load data

Outbound Loads and Empties Inbound Loads and EmptiesDate Tankcars Footage Boxcar Footage Total Cars Total Footage Date Tankcars Footage Boxcar Footage Total Cars Total Footage

1/4/2013 16 960 1 50 17 1010 1/4/2013 7 420 0 0 7 4201/5/2013 23 1380 9 450 32 1830 1/5/2013 11 660 0 0 11 6601/6/2013 16 960 1 50 17 1010 1/6/2013 16 960 1 50 17 10101/7/2013 20 1200 6 300 26 1500 1/7/2013 34 2040 9 450 43 24901/8/2013 11 660 11 550 22 1210 1/8/2013 0 0 0 0 0 01/9/2013 23 1380 5 250 28 1630 1/9/2013 20 1200 6 300 26 1500

1/10/2013 20 1200 8 400 28 1600 1/10/2013 15 900 11 550 26 14501/11/2013 13 780 0 0 13 780 1/11/2013 16 960 5 250 21 12101/12/2013 38 2280 7 350 45 2630 1/12/2013 25 1500 8 400 33 19001/13/2013 11 660 0 11 660 1/13/2013 9 540 0 0 9 5401/14/2013 12 720 0 12 720 1/14/2013 34 2040 7 350 41 2390

Assumptions:60' tankcars50' boxcarsEmpty movements are estimates only; based on cars on spot average 2 days7 cars per day added to Valero tank cars inbound and outbound (coke turn)

Aggregate estimated numbersN:\PROJECTS\_WC13\WC13‐3005_Benicia_Refinery\Data Collection\Counts\Video_Train_Crossings\UPPR_Data.xlsx

5/14/2013

UPPR DATA ‐ Delivery Schedule Estimate

Benicia Inbound Loads (Auto excluded) Outbound Empties - Not actual data - estimated assuming 2 days loaded spot to empty outbound move

Waybill Date

Sys Dest Circ7

CONSIGNEE UnitsMgrl Car Kind

Cmdy DescDate Units Car Type Load/Empty

1/6/2013 RV385 CROWN IMPORTS 1 BOX50 BEER 1/4/2013 1 BOXPL050 Empty

1/6/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 9 TANK LPG 1/4/2013 9 TANK Empty














Benicia Outbound Loads (Auto excluded) Inbound Empties - Not actual data - estimated assuming on 2 days empty spot to loaded outbound move

Waybill Date

Sys Orig Circ7

Shpr Name UnitsMgrl Car Kind

Cmdy DescDate Units Car Type Load/Empty

1/7/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 4 TANK LPG 1/5/2013 4 Tank Empty






1/14/2013 RV385 VALERO MARKETING SUPPLY 1 TANK CAUS SODA LIQ

Add 7 loads, 7 empties pet coke tank cars daily

N:\PROJECTS\_WC13\WC13‐3005_Benicia_Refinery\Data Collection\Counts\Video_Train_Crossings\UPPR_Data.xlsx5/14/2013

1. Reporting Railroad

FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION (FRA)

HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSING

ACCIDENT/INCIDENT REPORTOMB Approval No. 2130-0500

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FORM FRA F 6180.57 * NOTE THAT ALL CASUALTIES MUST BE REPORTED ON FORM FRA F 6180.55A

RR Accident/Incident No.

5. Date of Accident/Incident

3. Railroad Responsible for Track Maintenance

2. Other Railroad Involved in Train Accident/Incident

3a.

2a.

4. U.S. DOT-AAR Grade Crossing ID No.

2b.

3b.

6. Time of Accident/Incident

SP

SP

A0755

A0755

751527E 04/24/95 03:56 PM

Southern Pacific Transportation Co. [SP ]


7. Nearest Railroad Station 8. Division 9. County 10. State Code

CA06SOLANOBENICIA

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK STREET Public Private

Highway User Involved Rail Equipment Involved

Code Code13. TypeC. Truck-trailer

D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle

J. Other Motor Vehicle

K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)B

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed

(est. mph at impact)

1. Train2. Train

(units pulling)(units pushing)

1. North 2. South 3. East

3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)

(standing)7. Light loco(s)

(specify)

6

30Code

2

15. Direction (geographical)

4. West

18. Position of Car Unit in Train

1

16. Position 1. Stalled on crossing

2. Stopped on Crossing

3. Moving over crossing

4. Trapped

Code

319. Circumstance 1. Rail equipment struck highway user

2. Rail equipment struck by highway user

Code

120a. Was the highway user and/or rail equipment involved

in the impact transporting hazardous materials?

1. Highway User 2. Rail Equipment 3. Both 4. Neither

Code

4

Code


20b. Was there a hazardous materials release by

20c. State the name and quantity of the hazardous material released, if any

21. Temperature

(specify if minus) 78

22. Visibility (single entry)

1. Dawn 2. Day 3. Dusk 4. Dark

Code

2

23. Weather (single entry) Code

11. Clear 2. Cloudy 3. Rain 4. Fog 5. Sleet 6. Snow

24. Type of Equipment

(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching

9. Main./inspect. car

8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

8

25. Track Type Used by Rail

Equipment Involved

1. Main 2. Yard 3. Siding 4. Industry

Code

2

26. Track Number or Name

0700

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

0

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded

(Recorded if available)

5 mph

Code

EUnits E. Estimated 1. North 2. South 3. East

31. Time Table Direction

4. West

Code

4

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags

5. Hwy. traffic signals

6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman

8. Stop signsCrossing

10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)

33. Signaled Crossing 34. Whistle Ban Code

07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown

35. Location of Warning

21

1. Both Sides

2. Side of Vehicle Approach

3. Opposite Side of Vehicle Approach 1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

36. Crossing Warning Interconnected 37. Crossing Illuminated by Street

2

Code

with Highway Signals

Code

Lights or Special Lights

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown

Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female

40. Driver Drove Behind or in Front of Train

and Struck or was Struck by Second Train

1. Yes 2. No 3. Unknown2

Code

1. Drove around or thru the gate

3. Did not stop

2. Stopped and then proceeded

4. Stopped on crossing

5. Other (specify)3

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning

42. Driver Passed Standing

Highway Vehicle


2

Code 43. View of Track Obscured by (primary obstruction)

1

Code

1. Permanent Structure2. Standing railroad equipment

3. Passing Train4. Topography

5. Vegetation6. Highway Vehicles 8. Not Obstructed

7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:

46. Highway-Rail Crossing Users

49. Railroad Employees

52. Passengers on Train

Killed Injured44. Driver was

1. Killed 2. Injured 3. Uninjured

Code

3

47. Highway Vehicle Property Damage

(est. dollar damage) $1,0000

0

0

0

0

0

50. Total Number of People on Train

(include passengers and crew)

1. Yes 2. No

45. Was Driver in the Vehicle?

1

Code

48. Total Number of Highway-Rail Crossing Users

(include driver) 1

51. Is a Rail Equipment Accident /

Incident Report Being Filed

1. Yes 2. No 2

Code

53a. Special Study Block 53b. Special Study Block

54. Narrative Description

55. Typed Name and Title 56. Signature 57. Date

A. Train pulling- RCLB. Train pushing- RCL

C. Train standing- RCL

°F











3a.

2a.


2b.

3b.


SP

SP

A0055

A0055

751527E 01/07/95 06:30 PM




CA06SOLANOBAHIA

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK RD. Public Private



D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle


K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)B

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed


1. Train2. Train



3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)


(specify)

1

5Code

4


4. West


1




4. Trapped

Code



Code




Code

4

Code




21. Temperature




Code

4




(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching


8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

7


Equipment Involved


Code

4


0700

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

5

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded


5 mph

Code



4. West

Code

4

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags


6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman


10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)


07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown


21

1. Both Sides




2

Code


Code



Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female




Code


3. Did not stop



5. Other (specify)3

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning


Highway Vehicle


2


8

Code




7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:






Code

3



0

0

0

0

0



1. Yes 2. No


1

Code


(include driver) 1



1. Yes 2. No 2

Code






°F











3a.

2a.


2b.

3b.


SP

SP

A2523

A2523

751527E 11/29/93 06:10 PM




CA06SOLANOBENICIA




D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle


K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed


1. Train2. Train



3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)


(specify)

2

10Code

3


4. West


15




4. Trapped

Code



Code




Code

2

Code




21. Temperature




Code

4




(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching


8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

7


Equipment Involved


Code

2


0700 LEWAD

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

15

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded


2 mph

Code



4. West

Code

3

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags


6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman


10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)


07 10

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown


21

1. Both Sides




2

Code


Code



Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female




Code


3. Did not stop



5. Other (specify)3

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning


Highway Vehicle


2


8

Code




7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:






Code

3



0

0

0

0

0



1. Yes 2. No


1

Code


(include driver) 3



1. Yes 2. No 2

Code






°F











3a.

2a.


2b.

3b.


SP

SP

A3672

A3672

751527E 10/23/92 06:10 PM




CA06SOLANOBENICIA

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK ST Public Private



D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle


K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)C

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed


1. Train2. Train



3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)


(specify)

6

3Code

1


4. West


1




4. Trapped

Code



Code




Code

4

Code




21. Temperature




Code

4




(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching


8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

8


Equipment Involved


Code

2


728 LD

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

0

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded


5 mph

Code



4. West

Code

1

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags


6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman


10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)


07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown


21

1. Both Sides




2

Code


Code



Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female




Code


3. Did not stop



5. Other (specify)3

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning


Highway Vehicle


2


8

Code




7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:






Code

3


(est. dollar damage) $5000

0

0

0

1

0



1. Yes 2. No


1

Code


(include driver) 1



1. Yes 2. No 2

Code






°F











3a.

2a.


2b.

3b.


SP

SP

A1111

A1111

751527E 04/16/91 09:15 AM




CA06SOLANOARMY POINT

11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICA PARK ST Public Private



D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle


K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)C

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed


1. Train2. Train



3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)


(specify)

1

7Code

4


4. West


1




4. Trapped

Code



Code




Code

4

Code




21. Temperature




Code

2




(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching


8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

7


Equipment Involved


Code

2


0712

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

5

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded


10 mph

Code



4. West

Code

4

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags


6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman


10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)


07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown


21

1. Both Sides




2

Code


Code



Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female




Code


3. Did not stop



5. Other (specify)3

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning


Highway Vehicle


2


8

Code




7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:






Code

3



0

0

0

0

0



1. Yes 2. No


1

Code


(include driver) 1



1. Yes 2. No 2

Code






°F











3a.

2a.


2b.

3b.


SP

SP

E1300

E1300

751527E 03/06/90 12:05 PM








D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle


K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed


1. Train2. Train



3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)


(specify)

6

7Code

4


4. West


1




4. Trapped

Code



Code




Code

4

Code




21. Temperature




Code

2




(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching


8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

8


Equipment Involved


Code

2


0710

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

0

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded


7 mph

Code



4. West

Code

4

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags


6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman


10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)


07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown


21

1. Both Sides




2

Code


Code



Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female




Code


3. Did not stop



5. Other (specify)4

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning


Highway Vehicle


2


8

Code




7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:






Code

3


(est. dollar damage) $5000

0

0

0

0

0



1. Yes 2. No


1

Code


(include driver) 1



1. Yes 2. No 2

Code






°F











3a.

2a.


2b.

3b.


SP

SP

50329

50329

751527E 01/25/89 12:12 PM





11. City (if in a city) 12. Highway Name or No.BENICIA PARK Public Private



D. Pick-up truck

E. Van

A. Auto

B. Truck

F. Bus

G. School Bus

H. Motorcycle


K. Pedestrian

M. Other (specify)A

17. Equipment

14. Vehicle Speed


1. Train2. Train



3. Train

4. Car(s)5. Car(s)

(standing)

(moving)(standing)

6. Light loco(s)

8. Other

(moving)


(specify)

6

5Code

3


4. West


1




4. Trapped

Code



Code




Code

4

Code




21. Temperature




Code

2




(single entry)

1. Freight train

2. Passenger train

3. Commuter train

4. Work train

5. Single car

6. Cut of cars

7. Yard/Switching


8. Light loco(s)

A. Spec. MoW Equip.

Consist

Code

8


Equipment Involved


Code

2


700 LEAD

27. FRA Track

Class

1

28. Number of

Locomotive

1

29. Number of

Cars

0

30. Consist Speed

R. Recorded


5 mph

Code



4. West

Code

3

32. Type of

Warning

1. Gates

2. Cantilever FLS

3. Standard FLS

4. Wig wags


6. Audible

7. Crossbucks

9. Watchman


10. Flagged by crew

11. Other

12. None

(specify)

Code(s)


07

1. Yes

2. No

3. Unknown


21

1. Both Sides




2

Code


Code



Code

38. Driver's

Age

39. Driver's Code

1. Male

2. Female




Code


3. Did not stop



5. Other (specify)3

Code41. Driver

Gender

Warning


Highway Vehicle


2


8

Code




7. Other (specify)

1a.

Name Of

1b.

Alphabetic Code

Abbr.

Casualties to:






Code

3



0

0

0

0

0



1. Yes 2. No


1

Code


(include driver) 1



1. Yes 2. No 2

Code






°F

APPENNDIX B: INNTERSECT

TION ANAALYSIS WWORKSHEEETS

VISSIM Post-Processor Valero Refinery TIA

Average Results from 10 Runs Existing AM

Volume and Delay by Movement AM Peak Hour

Intersection 1 Bayshore Road/Park Road All-way Stop

Percent Total Delay (sec/veh)

Direction Movement Demand Served Served Average Std. Dev. LOS

Left Turn 28 29 103.9% 2.9 0.5 A

Through 26 29 110.0% 5.0 1.5 A

Right Turn 376 370 98.3% 7.1 0.5 A

Subtotal 430 427 99.3% 6.7 0.5 A

Left Turn 22 19 87.3% 5.6 0.8 A

Through 12 10 83.3% 7.6 2.0 A

Right Turn 4 4 90.0% 2.7 2.4 A

Subtotal 38 33 86.3% 5.9 0.6 A

Left Turn 4 4 95.0% 2.8 2.5 A

Through 19 18 95.8% 7.3 0.7 A

Right Turn 12 10 80.8% 6.4 5.1 A

Subtotal 35 32 90.6% 6.4 1.5 A

Left Turn 190 183 96.4% 7.1 0.9 A

Through 40 44 109.5% 6.1 1.0 A

Right Turn 63 61 96.5% 4.5 0.7 A

Subtotal 293 288 98.2% 6.5 0.5 A

Total 796 779 97.9% 6.6 0.4 A

6.6

Intersection 2 Bayshore Road/I-680 SB On-Ramp Uncontrolled



Left Turn 22 22 97.7% 1.8 1.3 A

Through 430 427 99.3% 2.0 0.2 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 452 449 99.2% 2.0 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through 31 30 95.8% 0.6 0.2 A

Right Turn 183 173 94.5% 0.9 0.2 A

Subtotal 214 203 94.7% 0.8 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 666 651 97.8% 1.6 0.2 A

2.0

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

Fehr & Peers 3/8/2013




Intersection 3 Bayshore Road/I-680 NB Off-Ramp Side-street Stop



Left Turn

Through 35 33 94.0% 0.5 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 35 33 94.0% 0.5 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 31 30 95.5% 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 31 30 95.5% 0.1 0.1 A

Left Turn 417 416 99.7% 36.8 10.7 E

Through

Right Turn 46 45 98.3% 29.5 10.1 D

Subtotal 463 461 99.5% 36.1 10.5 E

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 529 523 98.9% 31.8 9.0 D

36.8

Intersection 4 Bay Vista Court/Park Road Side-street Stop



Left Turn

Through

Right Turn 4 4 102.5% 3.6 0.3 A

Subtotal 4 4 102.5% 3.6 0.3 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 31 28 89.4% 0.2 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 31 28 89.4% 0.2 0.1 A

Left Turn 21 23 107.1% 0.4 0.3 A

Through 51 54 105.5% 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 72 76 106.0% 0.2 0.1 A

Total 107 108 101.0% 0.3 0.1 A

3.6

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB

EB

SB

SB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)





Intersection 5 Valero Refinery Entrance/Park Road Side-street Stop



Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 1 1 50.0% 1.3 2.8 A

Through

Right Turn 21 21 98.1% 6.8 2.2 A

Subtotal 22 21 95.9% 6.5 2.0 A

Left Turn 33 34 102.7% 1.4 1.0 A

Through 384 373 97.1% 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 417 407 97.6% 0.2 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 272 267 98.1% 0.5 0.1 A

Right Turn 36 37 101.9% 0.8 0.2 A

Subtotal 308 304 98.5% 0.5 0.2 A

Total 747 731 97.9% 0.5 0.1 A

6.8

SB

EB

WB

NB

Volume (vph)



Average Results from 10 Runs Existing Plus Project





Left Turn 28 27 96.4% 4.4 2.8 A

Through 26 26 100.4% 31.5 49.0 D

Right Turn 376 362 96.2% 95.3 8.1 F

Subtotal 430 415 96.5% 83.9 9.1 F

Left Turn 22 18 83.2% 113.6 53.4 F

Through 12 10 85.8% 49.3 93.3 E

Right Turn 4 4 100.0% 23.9 70.4 C

Subtotal 38 33 85.8% 85.4 55.3 F

Left Turn 4 4 107.5% 94.2 143.8 F

Through 19 18 96.3% 165.9 96.7 F

Right Turn 12 10 80.0% 31.9 46.5 D

Subtotal 35 32 92.0% 110.9 61.1 F

Left Turn 190 187 98.4% 125.7 11.7 F

Through 40 43 108.3% 81.7 54.7 F

Right Turn 63 63 99.2% 124.8 25.8 F

Subtotal 293 293 99.9% 119.0 9.9 F

Total 796 773 97.0% 101.8 7.4 F

101.8




Left Turn 22 21 97.3% 3.2 2.7 A

Through 430 415 96.5% 70.3 10.2 F

Right Turn

Subtotal 452 437 96.6% 66.7 8.9 F

Left Turn

Through 31 30 97.7% 1.4 0.3 A

Right Turn 183 177 96.5% 1.6 0.2 A

Subtotal 214 207 96.7% 1.6 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 666 643 96.6% 39.1 5.0 E

70.3

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)








Left Turn

Through 35 33 93.7% 0.7 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 35 33 93.7% 0.7 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 31 30 97.7% 0.2 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 31 30 97.7% 0.2 0.1 A

Left Turn 417 404 96.9% 302.0 25.6 F

Through

Right Turn 46 44 96.5% 302.0 31.2 F

Subtotal 463 449 96.9% 301.7 25.8 F

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 529 512 96.7% 266.6 22.7 F

302.0




Left Turn

Through

Right Turn 4 4 102.5% 3.9 1.0 A

Subtotal 4 4 102.5% 3.9 1.0 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 31 28 90.6% 0.2 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 31 28 90.6% 0.2 0.1 A

Left Turn 21 22 102.4% 0.4 0.3 A

Through 51 53 103.9% 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 72 75 103.5% 0.2 0.1 A

Total 107 107 99.7% 0.4 0.1 A

3.9

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB

EB

SB

SB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 1 0 20.0%

Through

Right Turn 21 21 98.1% 49.1 42.7 E

Subtotal 22 21 94.5% 46.9 40.7 E

Left Turn 33 33 98.5% 11.1 22.3 B

Through 384 366 95.3% 7.4 2.6 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 417 398 95.5% 7.9 0.6 A

Left Turn

Through 272 272 100.0% 83.4 25.7 F

Right Turn 36 33 91.1% 96.6 51.3 F

Subtotal 308 305 99.0% 83.8 25.8 F

Total 747 724 96.9% 47.3 13.0 E

96.6

SB

EB

WB

NB

Volume (vph)




Volume and Delay by Movement AM




Left Turn 17 18 106.5% 28.0 37.8 D

Through 15 15 100.0% 34.2 60.8 D

Right Turn 223 216 97.0% 94.2 5.6 F

Subtotal 255 249 97.8% 83.8 5.6 F

Left Turn 13 12 89.2% 134.6 106.0 F

Through 7 6 91.4% 28.7 56.7 D

Right Turn 2 2 95.0% 1.9 2.0 A

Subtotal 22 20 90.5% 76.9 57.2 F

Left Turn 2 3 155.0% 2.7 2.4 A

Through 11 11 99.1% 112.6 97.6 F

Right Turn 7 6 85.7% 22.3 43.6 C

Subtotal 20 20 100.0% 65.5 61.5 F

Left Turn 114 112 98.4% 139.0 20.7 F

Through 24 22 91.3% 153.7 85.1 F

Right Turn 37 37 98.9% 118.1 84.6 F

Subtotal 175 171 97.5% 138.5 12.7 F

Total 472 460 97.4% 103.2 3.7 F

103.2




Left Turn 13 13 101.5% 1.6 1.1 A

Through 255 249 97.6% 55.0 7.4 F

Right Turn

Subtotal 268 262 97.8% 52.9 7.5 F

Left Turn

Through 19 18 92.6% 1.0 0.6 A

Right Turn 109 107 98.4% 1.4 0.2 A

Subtotal 128 125 97.6% 1.3 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 396 387 97.8% 36.3 5.0 E

55.0

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB








Left Turn

Through 21 20 96.2% 29.7 33.5 D

Right Turn

Subtotal 21 20 96.2% 29.7 33.5 D

Left Turn

Through 19 18 92.6% 0.0 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 19 18 92.6% 0.0 0.1 A

Left Turn 247 242 97.9% 75.4 25.9 F

Through

Right Turn 29 31 106.2% 68.6 48.1 F

Subtotal 276 273 98.8% 74.4 27.1 F

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 316 311 98.3% 67.2 25.0 F

75.4




Left Turn

Through

Right Turn 2 4 205.0% 3.6 0.2 A

Subtotal 2 4 205.0% 3.6 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 18 16 88.3% 0.2 0.2 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 18 16 88.3% 0.2 0.2 A

Left Turn 12 12 97.5% 0.3 0.0 A

Through 31 30 98.1% 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 43 42 97.9% 0.2 0.0 A

Total 63 62 98.6% 0.4 0.1 A

3.6

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

SB

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 1 1 100.0% 1.1 2.3 A

Through

Right Turn 12 11 90.8% 16.9 21.8 C

Subtotal 13 12 91.5% 15.9 20.2 C

Left Turn 19 17 89.5% 1.6 1.2 A

Through 228 222 97.3% 8.9 0.6 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 247 239 96.7% 8.5 0.5 A

Left Turn

Through 163 159 97.8% 22.5 14.8 C

Right Turn 21 21 100.5% 8.0 10.5 A

Subtotal 184 181 98.1% 20.5 12.5 C

Total 444 431 97.1% 13.8 5.8 B

22.5

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB



Average Results from 10 Runs EXISTING PLUS PROJECT PM

Volume and Delay by Movement PM



Direction Movement Demand Served Served GEH Average Std. Dev. LOS

Left Turn 3 3 113.3% 0.2 2.4 2.0 A

Through 2 1 65.0% 0.5 1.8 2.9 A

Right Turn 34 32 94.7% 0.3 131.2 59.3 F

Subtotal 39 37 94.6% 0.3 103.7 49.3 F

Left Turn 2 4 205.0% 1.2 140.0 162.1 F

Through 1 0 0.0% 1.4

Right Turn

Subtotal 3 4 136.7% 0.6 115.8 137.4 F

Left Turn

Through 2 2 115.0% 0.2 118.6 175.0 F

Right Turn 1 2 170.0% 0.6 0.9 1.2 A

Subtotal 3 4 133.3% 0.5 81.6 114.0 F

Left Turn 18 19 106.1% 0.3 130.7 63.7 F

Through 4 4 100.0% 0.0 88.4 145.5 F

Right Turn 6 6 98.3% 0.0 84.3 119.0 F

Subtotal 28 29 103.6% 0.2 117.2 41.2 F

Total 73 74 101.4% 0.1 113.4 21.1 F

113.4




Left Turn 2 2 120.0% 0.3 0.1 0.2 A

Through 39 37 94.6% 0.3 0.3 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 41 39 95.9% 0.3 0.3 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 3 2 80.0% 0.4 0.6 0.9 A

Right Turn 17 18 107.1% 0.3 0.5 0.3 A

Subtotal 20 21 103.0% 0.1 0.5 0.3 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 61 60 98.2% 0.1 0.4 0.1 A

0.6

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB








Left Turn

Through 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.3 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.3 A

Left Turn

Through 3 2 80.0% 0.4 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 3 2 80.0% 0.4 0.0 0.0 A

Left Turn 38 35 92.9% 0.4 5.6 0.6 A

Through

Right Turn 4 5 132.5% 0.6 4.1 2.1 A

Subtotal 42 41 96.7% 0.2 5.4 0.7 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 48 47 97.9% 0.1 4.6 0.6 A

5.6




Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 3 4 133.3% 0.5 0.1 0.0 A

Left Turn 2 3 125.0% 0.3 0.2 0.2 A

Through 5 5 98.0% 0.0 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 7 7 105.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 A

Total 10 11 114.0% 0.4 0.1 0.0 A

0.2

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

SB

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn 2 4 205.0% 1.2 4.6 1.0 A

Subtotal 2 4 205.0% 1.2 4.6 1.0 A

Left Turn 3 3 96.7% 0.1 0.1 0.1 A

Through 35 36 102.0% 0.1 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 38 39 101.6% 0.1 0.0 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 26 25 95.4% 0.2 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn 3 3 93.3% 0.1 0.2 0.2 A

Subtotal 29 28 95.2% 0.3 0.1 0.1 A

Total 69 70 101.9% 0.2 0.4 0.1 A

4.6

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB



Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base





Left Turn 40 36 88.8% 3.3 0.5 A

Through 30 27 90.3% 5.3 1.1 A

Right Turn 500 439 87.9% 8.3 0.8 A

Subtotal 570 502 88.1% 7.9 0.7 A

Left Turn 30 28 93.7% 5.7 0.6 A

Through 20 19 94.0% 7.0 0.9 A

Right Turn 10 10 99.0% 4.7 2.2 A

Subtotal 60 57 94.7% 6.0 0.6 A

Left Turn 10 9 91.0% 4.4 2.3 A

Through 20 19 94.5% 6.9 0.9 A

Right Turn 20 17 84.0% 5.9 1.7 A

Subtotal 50 45 89.6% 6.1 0.8 A

Left Turn 250 244 97.8% 7.9 1.1 A

Through 50 49 97.2% 5.6 1.0 A

Right Turn 80 80 99.9% 4.8 2.0 A

Subtotal 380 373 98.1% 7.0 0.9 A

Total 1,060 977 92.1% 7.4 0.4 A

7.4




Left Turn 30 29 95.7% 2.0 1.2 A

Through 570 502 88.1% 2.5 0.3 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 600 531 88.5% 2.4 0.3 A

Left Turn

Through 40 40 100.5% 0.7 0.3 A

Right Turn 250 240 96.2% 1.0 0.1 A

Subtotal 290 281 96.8% 1.0 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 890 811 91.2% 2.0 0.2 A

2.5

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)








Left Turn

Through 50 48 95.6% 0.6 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 50 48 95.6% 0.6 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 40 40 100.8% 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 40 40 100.8% 0.1 0.1 A

Left Turn 550 483 87.8% 483.7 31.1 F

Through

Right Turn 60 50 83.3% 483.4 32.7 F

Subtotal 610 533 87.3% 483.6 31.3 F

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 700 621 88.7% 410.6 25.7 F

483.7




Left Turn 10 10 97.0% 5.7 1.2 A

Through

Right Turn 10 7 72.0% 3.4 1.6 A

Subtotal 20 17 84.5% 4.8 1.0 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 40 38 94.5% 0.3 0.1 A

Right Turn 10 8 82.0% 0.5 0.1 A

Subtotal 50 46 92.0% 0.3 0.1 A

Left Turn 30 28 93.7% 0.6 0.5 A

Through 70 66 93.9% 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 100 94 93.8% 0.3 0.2 A

Total 170 157 92.2% 0.8 0.1 A

5.7

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB

EB

SB

SB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 10 10 98.0% 11.2 5.4 B

Through

Right Turn 30 27 90.3% 7.5 1.3 A

Subtotal 40 37 92.3% 8.3 1.4 A

Left Turn 40 36 90.0% 2.8 1.8 A

Through 510 451 88.4% 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 550 487 88.5% 0.3 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 350 346 98.8% 0.7 0.1 A

Right Turn 50 50 99.0% 1.3 0.6 A

Subtotal 400 395 98.9% 0.7 0.2 A

Total 990 919 92.8% 0.8 0.1 A

11.2

SB

EB

WB

NB

Volume (vph)



Average Results from 10 Runs Cumulative Base Plus Project





Left Turn 40 32 79.8% 7.2 2.3 A

Through 30 25 84.0% 8.9 3.4 A

Right Turn 500 389 77.7% 102.8 12.5 F

Subtotal 570 446 78.2% 90.8 10.9 F

Left Turn 30 28 93.7% 127.1 71.5 F

Through 20 19 92.5% 55.4 47.0 F

Right Turn 10 10 104.0% 50.9 63.0 F

Subtotal 60 57 95.0% 92.4 55.3 F

Left Turn 10 9 88.0% 50.7 79.1 F

Through 20 18 87.5% 108.0 78.3 F

Right Turn 20 17 85.0% 50.7 74.5 F

Subtotal 50 43 86.6% 76.5 66.6 F

Left Turn 250 244 97.8% 121.3 12.3 F

Through 50 50 100.8% 94.0 54.3 F

Right Turn 80 79 98.4% 86.5 34.3 F

Subtotal 380 374 98.3% 111.3 8.1 F

Total 1,060 920 86.8% 100.3 9.3 F

100.3




Left Turn 30 25 82.0% 12.0 21.3 B

Through 570 446 78.3% 81.5 8.1 F

Right Turn

Subtotal 600 471 78.5% 76.8 6.2 F

Left Turn

Through 40 39 96.3% 1.6 0.5 A

Right Turn 250 242 96.8% 1.9 0.2 A

Subtotal 290 280 96.7% 1.8 0.3 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 890 751 84.4% 40.5 2.9 E

81.5

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB








Left Turn

Through 50 48 95.8% 0.6 0.2 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 50 48 95.8% 0.6 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through 40 39 96.5% 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 40 39 96.5% 0.1 0.1 A

Left Turn 550 423 76.8% 646.9 27.8 F

Through

Right Turn 60 44 72.7% 628.5 37.5 F

Subtotal 610 466 76.4% 645.0 28.2 F

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 700 553 79.0% 550.8 26.3 F

646.9




Left Turn 10 10 99.0% 5.2 0.4 A

Through

Right Turn 10 7 70.0% 3.0 1.7 A

Subtotal 20 17 84.5% 4.3 0.7 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 40 36 91.0% 0.2 0.1 A

Right Turn 10 10 97.0% 0.5 0.4 A

Subtotal 50 46 92.2% 0.3 0.1 A

Left Turn 30 26 88.0% 0.4 0.2 A

Through 70 66 94.7% 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 100 93 92.7% 0.2 0.1 A

Total 170 156 91.6% 0.8 0.1 A

5.2

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

SB

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 10 9 94.0% 57.9 103.4 F

Through

Right Turn 30 28 91.7% 77.0 57.1 F

Subtotal 40 37 92.3% 69.1 59.4 F

Left Turn 40 33 82.0% 11.7 26.0 B

Through 510 402 78.8% 7.0 2.5 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 550 435 79.1% 7.5 0.4 A

Left Turn

Through 350 347 99.0% 129.6 23.2 F

Right Turn 50 49 97.0% 115.2 39.5 F

Subtotal 400 395 98.8% 128.0 18.8 F

Total 990 867 87.5% 76.1 8.9 F

129.6

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB








Left Turn 24 26 107.1% 19.3 26.2 C

Through 18 20 109.4% 20.0 28.8 C

Right Turn 295 284 96.3% 92.3 7.1 F

Subtotal 337 330 97.8% 83.1 5.9 F

Left Turn 18 16 91.1% 127.0 95.0 F

Through 12 11 90.0% 74.2 102.7 F

Right Turn 6 6 95.0% 10.0 16.9 A

Subtotal 36 33 91.4% 83.0 72.1 F

Left Turn 6 5 75.0% 63.1 105.7 F

Through 12 10 81.7% 75.5 81.4 F

Right Turn 12 9 78.3% 5.7 4.2 A

Subtotal 30 24 79.0% 47.7 59.3 E

Left Turn 148 142 95.8% 141.2 19.6 F

Through 30 27 91.0% 122.1 67.3 F

Right Turn 47 48 102.8% 128.3 50.4 F

Subtotal 225 217 96.6% 135.9 17.3 F

Total 628 604 96.1% 102.4 11.0 F

102.4




Left Turn 18 19 102.8% 6.1 13.6 A

Through 337 329 97.7% 62.8 5.6 F

Right Turn

Subtotal 355 348 97.9% 59.5 5.3 F

Left Turn

Through 24 24 98.3% 1.9 1.2 A

Right Turn 148 139 93.6% 1.6 0.3 A

Subtotal 172 162 94.3% 1.6 0.4 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 527 510 96.7% 39.8 3.9 E

62.8

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)








Left Turn

Through 30 29 97.0% 74.4 40.3 F

Right Turn

Subtotal 30 29 97.0% 74.4 40.3 F

Left Turn

Through 24 24 98.8% 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 24 24 98.8% 0.1 0.1 A

Left Turn 325 319 98.0% 172.7 29.8 F

Through

Right Turn 35 36 103.4% 139.7 71.5 F

Subtotal 360 355 98.6% 169.8 30.3 F

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 414 408 98.5% 152.4 27.2 F

172.7




Left Turn 6 5 78.3% 5.1 0.6 A

Through

Right Turn 6 4 73.3% 3.1 1.9 A

Subtotal 12 9 75.8% 4.3 0.8 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 24 19 80.8% 0.2 0.1 A

Right Turn 6 5 88.3% 0.7 0.6 A

Subtotal 30 25 82.3% 0.3 0.2 A

Left Turn 18 17 95.6% 0.3 0.1 A

Through 42 42 99.0% 0.1 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 60 59 98.0% 0.2 0.1 A

Total 102 93 90.8% 0.7 0.2 A

5.1

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB

EB

SB

SB

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 6 6 98.3% 4.9 5.8 A

Through

Right Turn 18 15 84.4% 42.9 37.8 E

Subtotal 24 21 87.9% 32.6 27.7 D

Left Turn 24 24 101.3% 1.9 1.3 A

Through 301 286 95.0% 8.1 0.4 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 325 310 95.4% 7.7 0.4 A

Left Turn

Through 207 202 97.5% 43.9 21.9 E

Right Turn 30 32 106.7% 45.8 40.3 E

Subtotal 237 234 98.6% 43.7 22.1 E

Total 586 565 96.4% 24.7 10.1 C

45.8

SB

EB

WB

NB

Volume (vph)



Average Results from 10 Runs CB PLUS PROJECT PM





Left Turn 4 3 82.5% 0.4 2.2 1.8 A

Through 3 3 86.7% 0.2 2.1 2.6 A

Right Turn 45 39 87.6% 0.9 111.6 38.7 F

Subtotal 52 45 87.1% 1.0 88.4 33.8 F

Left Turn 3 2 70.0% 0.6 42.3 73.5 E

Through 2 1 35.0% 1.1 1.0 2.2 A

Right Turn 1 1 130.0% 0.3 1.3 2.3 A

Subtotal 6 4 68.3% 0.8 25.3 41.3 D

Left Turn 1 1 50.0% 0.6

Through 2 1 50.0% 0.8 21.4 43.8 C

Right Turn 2 2 85.0% 0.2 1.1 1.4 A

Subtotal 5 3 64.0% 0.9 12.8 24.7 B

Left Turn 23 23 101.3% 0.1 141.1 52.5 F

Through 5 5 98.0% 0.0 125.9 146.3 F

Right Turn 7 7 102.9% 0.1 116.1 138.9 F

Subtotal 35 35 101.1% 0.1 138.0 38.2 F

Total 98 88 89.8% 1.0 102.1 17.2 F

102.1




Left Turn 3 3 113.3% 0.2 0.1 0.2 A

Through 52 45 86.5% 1.0 0.3 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 55 48 88.0% 0.9 0.3 0.1 A

Left Turn

Through 4 3 70.0% 0.7 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn 23 23 100.0% 0.0 0.8 0.4 A

Subtotal 27 26 95.6% 0.2 0.7 0.3 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 82 74 90.5% 0.9 0.4 0.1 A

0.8

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB

SB

EB

WB

NB








Left Turn

Through 5 4 80.0% 0.5 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 5 4 80.0% 0.5 0.0 0.0 A

Left Turn

Through 4 3 70.0% 0.7 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 4 3 70.0% 0.7 0.0 0.0 A

Left Turn 50 44 88.4% 0.8 5.9 0.7 A

Through

Right Turn 5 5 108.0% 0.2 5.4 0.8 A

Subtotal 55 50 90.2% 0.7 5.8 0.6 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Total 64 56 88.1% 1.0 5.0 0.6 A

5.9




Left Turn 1 0 0.0% 1.4

Through

Right Turn 1 0 0.0% 1.4

Subtotal 2 0 0.0% 2.0 0.0 0.0 A

Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn

Through 4 3 80.0% 0.4 0.1 0.0 A

Right Turn 1 1 80.0% 0.2 0.2 0.3 A

Subtotal 5 4 80.0% 0.5 0.1 0.1 A

Left Turn 3 3 103.3% 0.1 0.1 0.2 A

Through 7 7 92.9% 0.2 0.0 0.1 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 10 10 96.0% 0.1 0.1 0.1 A

Total 17 14 80.0% 0.9 0.1 0.0 A

0.2

Volume (vph)

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

SB

WB

EB

WB

NB

NB








Left Turn

Through

Right Turn

Subtotal

Left Turn 1 1 80.0% 0.2 0.5 1.5 A

Through

Right Turn 3 3 110.0% 0.2 4.2 2.0 A

Subtotal 4 4 102.5% 0.0 3.7 1.1 A

Left Turn 4 3 65.0% 0.8 1.2 2.1 A

Through 46 40 86.3% 1.0 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn

Subtotal 50 42 84.6% 1.1 0.1 0.2 A

Left Turn

Through 32 32 100.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 A

Right Turn 5 5 98.0% 0.0 0.2 0.2 A

Subtotal 37 37 100.0% 0.0 0.0 0.1 A

Total 91 83 91.6% 0.8 0.3 0.1 A

4.2

Volume (vph)

SB

EB

WB

NB


draft benicia refinery tia may2013f991a639...draft trans valero ben may 2013 1.0 1.1 the valer the...

Documents