dr. robin saha study of the u.s. institute university of montana july 8, 2010
TRANSCRIPT
Introduction to Environmental Politics and Policy
Dr. Robin SahaStudy of the U.S. Institute
University of MontanaJuly 8, 2010
TopicsFeatures of U.S. political system
Role of state governmentDefinitions – policy and power – sources of powerPublic policy theoriesHistoric periods of U.S. environmental policyMajor environmental policies in the U.S.Policy process / policy stages / policy cyclePolicy “actors” – strategies and tactics to
influence decision makersPolicy typologyGroup activity (if we have time)
Features of U.S. Political System1. Democratically-elected leaders
2. High level of citizen participation
3. Constitutional separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial (3) branches – horizontal fragmentation
A. Federalism – federal supremacy over state government (hierarchy or levels of governmental authority), constitutionally-reserved state powers, with local powers deriving from state authority – vertical fragmentation
B. Resulting in dispersed and ever-contested power
4. Relatively open government
5. Primacy of individual (and corporate) freedom and private property rights
6. Constitutional guarantee of freedom of belief, expression, and the press, and rights to associate with others
7. Powerful organized interests
8. Short terms for elected officials
9. Campaign financing allowed
10. Enduring two-party systemTo read more, see: http://bensguide.gpo.gov/9-12/index.html
Public PolicyRepresents government’s attempt to address and/or solve perceived public problems and:
1. Includes the intentions, actions, and effects of government.
2. The intentions may or may not be publicly stated.
3. Any formal declarations such as laws, regulations, executive orders, and court decisions are public policy.
Government Policy Types Corresponding to the U.S. government structure and the three branches of government
Legislative policy – policies enacted by Congress, state legislatures, and city councils
Administrative policy – executive branch policies established by the president, state governors, city mayors and their political appointees, and by federal and state agencies and city offices (bureaucracies)
Judicial policy – policies established by the federal and state courts
Role of State Government in Environmental PolicyImplement federal environmental laws and programs through
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Must have state legislation modeled after federal legislation (must be as or more stringent than federal laws)
In 1980s and 1990s, developed capacity to implement environmental and natural resource laws, accompanied by growth in the state environmental bureaucracy (number and size of agencies)
States have tended to follow federal leadership
Some states (esp. California) are environmental policy innovators – can provide good ideas for federal (national) policy
State can be important testing grounds for new policy approaches
Environmental Policy“… comprises a diversity of governmental actions that affect or attempt to affect environmental quality or the use of natural resources …. We cannot expect to locate environmental policy in any single decision or statute. Rather it is the aggregate of statutes, regulations, and court precedents, and the attitudes and behavior of public officials charged with making, implementing, and enforcing them. Policies may be tangible or largely symbolic … they may nevertheless bring about important environmental changes over time by influencing public beliefs and organizational values and decision making.” – Michael Kraft (2003).
Public Policy Theories(also see Vaughn book, Ch. 3)
Elite theory Policy reflects the values, preferences, and
judgments of the governing elites
Elites include powerful government officials, foundations, corporate executives, and influential professionals such as scientists, doctors, lawyers
Focuses on the role of leaders and leadership
Assumes elites influence (manipulate?) “the Masses” rather than the other way around
Movement of non-elites into elite positions is slow and controlled to maintain stability
Public Policy Theories (continued)Group Theory
Policy is the result of the continuous struggle among interests groups made up of individuals or organizations with common beliefs, values, and goals
Groups differ in the amount and type of resources (political capital), and thus their influence over other groups and policy makers
Government acts as the neutral arbitrator.
Different groups may cancel out or check the power of other groups
Policy makers and the political system manage group conflict by establishing rules of struggle, arranging or imposing compromises, and balancing interests
Policy is the result of the balancing of power between competing groups and represents an equilibrium point
PowerPower is ability to
reward other actors for doing what one wants or to penalize or punish them for working against ones interests
What are some sources of power?
Public Policy Theories (continued)Government Politics Model
A “middle ground” theory that views policies as the result of the influences of elites and organized interest groups
Assumes that policy decisions are the result of the competition, bargaining, and compromise among a diverse set of policy actors
Policy actors have unique interests, resources, and strategies they use to advance their interests
Actors include government decision makers (more on policy actors later)
Political process leads to incremental policy making, i.e., modest new policies and small changes to existing ones,
The political system is most likely to overcome these tendencies in times of major crises
What are some advantages (good things) about
incremental decision making?
What are some disadvantages?
Non-governmental policy actorsInterest groups (e.g., NGOs, professional
associations, unions – organized labor), their lobbyists, and members
Corporations, industry trade associations, and their lobbyists
Political Action Committees (PACs)The MediaScientists and scientific bodiesThink tanks (policy and legal research institutes)CelebritiesGeneral public, individual citizens, and public
opinion
Factors Related to Interest Group InfluenceSize of group membershipAbility to mobilize members into actionMonetary and other resources, including
technical and scientific capabilitiesSkill of its leadershipSocial status and prestige of organization and
leadersSalience of policy issue to mission of the
organizationPresence of absence of competing organizationsAttitudes of public officials (decision makers)
toward group and access to decision makersSite of decision making in the political system
What are some tactics and strategies used by
non-governmental policy actors to achieve their
environmental policy goals in political battles
Historical Periods of U.S. Environmental Policy(from Vaughn book, Ch. 1)
Colonial period: 1607 to 1900
Progression reforms and conservationism : 1900 to 1945
Recreation and the age of ecology: post-WWII to 1969
Earth Days and deregulation: 1970 to 1992
Global awareness and gridlock: 1993 to 2000
Rollback: 2000 to 2009
Major Public Lands and Conservation PoliciesYellowstone National Park Established (1872)Yosemite National Park Established (1890)Forest Reserve Act of 1891Forest Management Act of 1897Antiquities Act of 1906Multiple Use and Sustained Yield Act of 1960 Wilderness Act of 1964National Environmental Policy Act of 1970 (NEPA)Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA)National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA)Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976
(FLPMA)Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act of 1980
(ANILCA)Health Forests Protection Act of 2003 (HFPA)
Major U.S. Environmental Policies(see separate handout)
Clean Air Act of 1970Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of
1972 (Clean Water Act)Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA) of 1972Safe Water Drinking Act (SDWA) of 1974Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of
1976Comprehensive Emergency Response Compensation
and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA)Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
Policy Process Stages (Policy Cycle)(also see Vaughn book, Introduction)
Moving from problem to solution:Problem Identification/Definition Agenda SettingPolicy FormulationPolicy Adoption/LegitimationPolicy Implementation (and budgeting)Policy Evaluation Policy Change/EvolutionPolicy Termination or Problem Resolution
Public Policy Typology (and associated politics)1. Distributive – grants, programs, and services that distribute resources or
projects (often “pork barrel”) with only “winners” (in the most narrow sense) • College student grants • Agricultural subsidies • Highways and bridges • Parks and other amenities
2. Redistributive – having goal of redistributing wealth, income, or opportunity to compensate for market or government failures, with clear “winners” and “losers” • Welfare • Taxes • Social security • Affirmative action
3. Regulatory – restricting individual or groups conduct to be within acceptable bounds with general societal benefits and costs to specific industries • Consumer protection • Workplace health and safety • Environmental • Licensing, anti-trust, etc.
Instruments of Public Policy1. Regulation
• Laws or decrees requiring citizens or corporations to do something or not do something
• Sanctions imposed for non-compliance2. Governmental Management
• Direct provision of services or programs to the public, private industry, or other levels of government
• Includes management of natural resources and environmental quality3. Taxing and Spending
• Mechanism to regulate and provide services• Also used to create incentives to encourage or discourage certain
behaviors and activities, such as smoking4. Market Mechanisms
• Involve decisions to intervene or not into the market place• Can include subsidies and other incentives, or disincentives, to
encourage or discourage certain behaviors and activities5. Education, Information, and Persuasion
• Attempts to persuade people or businesses to behave a certain way
Incentive-Based RegulationRather than using penalties for non-compliance, incentive-
based regulation encourages individuals, government entities, and corporations to voluntarily perform desirable behaviors by providing incentives, usually economic (market-based incentives) though sometime rewards and recognition or relief from future regulation are used.
Examples: Cap and trade provisions for SO2 in Clean Air Act of 1990; similar proposed programs for reducing CO2 emissions and hazardous air pollutants such as mercury; tax credits for alternative energy; Candidate Conservation Assurances and Agreement (CCCAs) under the Endangered Species Act; beverage container deposits to encourage recycling; EPA’s Energy Star program to encourage energy conservation.
QUESTIONS?
ActivityIn your country groups
Pick an environmental problem or issue
Think of policy instruments (regulation; gov’t mgt., taxing & spending; market mechanisms; education, information, & persuasion) that can address or help solve the problem
For each policy instrument identify the level of government and policy actors that should be involved
Discuss obstacles or challenges to policy adoption
Report back to full group
Thank You!