dr mercedes de onis - who · length at selected centiles for the pooled sample and the sample...
TRANSCRIPT
Dr Mercedes de Dr Mercedes de OnisOnis
Department of NutritionDepartment of NutritionWorld Health OrganizationWorld Health OrganizationGeneva, SwitzerlandGeneva, Switzerland
1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years
WHO Child Growth StandardsImplications for everyday practice
Why?Why?
WHO Child Growth Standards
Milestones in the development of theMilestones in the development of the WHO child growth standardsWHO child growth standards
19911991--19931993 WHO Working Group on Infant GrowthWHO Working Group on Infant Growth
Comprehensive review shows growth patterns of Comprehensive review shows growth patterns of healthy breastfed infants differ from the current healthy breastfed infants differ from the current NCHS/WHO international reference NCHS/WHO international reference
A new growth reference is needed to improve infant A new growth reference is needed to improve infant health managementhealth management
The reference population should reflect health The reference population should reflect health recommendations in view of the frequent use of recommendations in view of the frequent use of references as references as ““standardsstandards””
Mean ZMean Z--scores of healthy breastfed infants scores of healthy breastfed infants relative to the NCHS/WHO referencerelative to the NCHS/WHO reference
Source: An Evaluation of Infant Growth, WHO, 1994
Source: An Evaluation of Infant Growth, WHO, 1994
Milestones in the development of the Milestones in the development of the WHO child growth standardsWHO child growth standards
19931993 WHO Expert CommitteeWHO Expert Committee
Recommends development of a new international Recommends development of a new international growth referencegrowth reference
Based on an international sample of Based on an international sample of ““healthyhealthy”” infantsinfants
19941994 WHA resolution (WHA 47.5)WHA resolution (WHA 47.5)
Endorses need for new referenceEndorses need for new reference
Requests it to be based on breastfed infantsRequests it to be based on breastfed infants
How?How?
WHO Child Growth Standards
A Growth Curve for the A Growth Curve for the 21st Century21st Century
Department of Nutrition World Health Organization
Geneva, Switzerland
The WHO Multicentre The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Growth Reference
StudyStudy
Approaches for developing growth referencesApproaches for developing growth references
Descriptive approach (existing growth charts):Descriptive approach (existing growth charts):defines growth on the basis of representative samples of defines growth on the basis of representative samples of healthy groups, i.e., without identifiable disease healthy groups, i.e., without identifiable disease
Prescriptive approach (new approach by WHO):Prescriptive approach (new approach by WHO):defines growth on the basis of health and feeding defines growth on the basis of health and feeding practices known to promote optimal growth and selects practices known to promote optimal growth and selects the sample accordinglythe sample accordingly
Optimal NutritionOptimal Nutrition–– Breastfed infantsBreastfed infants–– Appropriate complementary feedingAppropriate complementary feeding
Optimal EnvironmentOptimal Environment–– No microbiological contaminationNo microbiological contamination–– No smokingNo smoking
Optimal Health CareOptimal Health Care–– ImmunizationImmunization–– PediatricPediatric routinesroutines
OptimalGrowth
WHO Growth Reference StudyWHO Growth Reference Study Prescriptive ApproachPrescriptive Approach
Conceptual basis for the selection of the Conceptual basis for the selection of the population population
"What we want is not a higher standard of "What we want is not a higher standard of perfection in a few, but a higher average, perfection in a few, but a higher average, and this can be best produced by the and this can be best produced by the elimination of the lowest of all and a free elimination of the lowest of all and a free intermingling of the rest"intermingling of the rest"
Alfred Alfred RusselRussel Wallace (1900)Wallace (1900)
WHO Child Growth StandardsWHO Child Growth StandardsStudy sampleStudy sample
Six countriesSix countries
<5% stunting, wasting, underweight<5% stunting, wasting, underweight
At least 20% mothers breastfeedingAt least 20% mothers breastfeeding
No health/environmental constraints on growthNo health/environmental constraints on growth
NonNon--smoking mothersmoking mother
Willing to follow feeding recommendationsWilling to follow feeding recommendations
Single, term birthSingle, term birth
No significant morbidityNo significant morbidity
Measurement and Measurement and standardization protocolsstandardization protocols
Rigorous scientific standards are Rigorous scientific standards are applied to a complex crossapplied to a complex cross--cultural cultural fieldfield--based project. based project.
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study
Time schedule child anthropometry in Time schedule child anthropometry in longitudinal study (21 visits)longitudinal study (21 visits)
Measurement Time frame Frequency No. of visitsBirth Once 1Weeks 2-8 Bi-weekly 43-12 months Monthly 10
Weight, length, headcircumference
14-24 months Bi-monthly 6
3-12 months Monthly 10Arm circumferenceSkinfold thicknesses 14-24 months Bi-monthly 6
Motor developmentMotor development
Six universal motor Six universal motor development development milestones assessed milestones assessed between 4 and between 4 and
18 18
months of age. months of age.
The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Rationale, Planning & Implementation
Food and Nutrition BulletinVol 25, Suppl no.1 March 2004
ConstructionConstructiongrowth growth
standardsstandardsWHO, Geneva WHO, Geneva
1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years
WHO Child Growth StandardsWHO Child Growth Standards
Mean length from birth to 24 months for the six MGRS sitesMean length from birth to 24 months for the six MGRS sites
Age (days)
Mea
n of
Len
gth
(cm
)
0 200 400 600
5060
7080
BrazilGhanaIndiaNorwayOmanUSA
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of linear growth differences among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006;450:56-65.
Length at selected centiles for the pooled sample and the Length at selected centiles for the pooled sample and the sample following the exclusion of Norwaysample following the exclusion of Norway
0 200 400 600
Age (days)
5060
7080
90
Leng
th (c
m)
Pooled P3Pooled P25Pooled P50Pooled P75Pooled P97Exc Norway P3Exc Norway P25Exc Norway P50Exc Norway P75Exc Norway P97
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of linear growth differences among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006;450:56-65.
Length at selected centiles for the pooled sample and the Length at selected centiles for the pooled sample and the sample following the exclusion of Indiasample following the exclusion of India
0 200 400 600
Age (days)
5060
7080
90
Leng
th (c
m)
Pooled P3Pooled P25Pooled P50Pooled P75Pooled P97Exc India P3Exc India P25Exc India P50Exc India P75Exc India P97
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. Assessment of linear growth differences among populations in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Acta Paediatr Suppl 2006;450:56-65.
Construction of growth curves Construction of growth curves
The rigorous methods of data collection yielded very high-quality dataset
State-of-art statistical methods applied in a methodical way:
– Detailed examination of 30 existing methods, including types of distributions and smoothing techniques;
– Selection of a software package flexible enough to allow comparative testing of alternative methods and the actual generation of the curves;
– Systematic application of the selected approach to the data to generate models that resulted in the best fit
Ongoing statistical review by external expert panel
WHO Child Growth StandardsWHO Child Growth Standards
Attained growth
Length/height-for-age
Weight-for-age
Weight-for-length/height
Body mass index-for-age
Arm circumference-for-age
Triceps skinfold-for-age
Subscapular skinfold-for-age
Head circumference-for-age
Growth velocity
Weight
Head circumference
Length
April 2007
April 2006
April 2009
WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study
Motor Development Assessment
WeightWeight--forfor--ageage, 0, 0--6 6 monthsmonths
WHO Child Growth StandardsWHO Child Growth StandardsGrowth velocity
Variables: weight, length, head circumference
Increments: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 6-months
Total of 160 tables!
Software for PC and PDASoftware for PC and PDAPC PDA
Adoption and implementationAdoption and implementation
Standards well received: Standards well received: opportunity to redefine opportunity to redefine and revitalize actions to promote child growth and and revitalize actions to promote child growth and developmentdevelopment
Incorporation of height and BMI to assess Incorporation of height and BMI to assess double burden (stunting and overweight)double burden (stunting and overweight)
> 120 countries adopted and in different phases > 120 countries adopted and in different phases of implementationof implementation
> 30 countries in process of adopting> 30 countries in process of adopting
Implementation WHO Child Growth StandardsImplementation WHO Child Growth StandardsNovember 2009November 2009
!!!!
!
Implementation StatusImplementing
Adoption being discussed
Not being discussed
Status unknown
Motives for adoptionMotives for adoption Improved tool for growth assessmentImproved tool for growth assessmentCoherence with country adoption of IYCF Coherence with country adoption of IYCF
global strategyglobal strategy To monitor double burden of malnutrition To monitor double burden of malnutrition
(stunting and overweight)(stunting and overweight)Harmonizing growth assessment systems Harmonizing growth assessment systems
within within andand between countriesbetween countries
Training of trainers regional workshopsTraining of trainers regional workshops
EMRO: El Cairo, February 2007
AMRO (South America): Bolivia, April 2007
AMRO (Central America): Nicaragua, May 2007
AFRO: Ethiopia, June 2007
WPRO: Malaysia, September 2007
SEARO: Indonesia, October 2007
Did we Did we achieved achieved what we what we
aimed to?aimed to?
WHO Child Growth Standards
Major differences between WHO standards Major differences between WHO standards and existing growth charts and existing growth charts
Measurement schedules (21 visits in 24 mo)
Infant feeding modes
Standardization measurement techniques
Availability empirical data in early months!
Mean ZMean Z--scores of healthy breastfed infants scores of healthy breastfed infants relative to the NCHS/WHO referencerelative to the NCHS/WHO reference
Source: An Evaluation of Infant Growth, WHO, 1994
Source: An Evaluation of Infant Growth, WHO, 1994
Weight-for-age Z-scores WHO standard versus NCHS reference
-2.5
-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Age (mo)
Wei
ght-f
or-a
ge Z
-sco
re
Boys WHO Girls WHOBoys NCHS Girls NCHS
Fuente: Saha KK, Frongillo EA, Alam DS, Arifeen SE, Persson LA, Rasmussen KM. Use of the new World Health Organization child growth standards to describe longitudinal growth of breastfed rural Bangladeshi infants and young children.Food Nutr Bull 2009;30:137-44.
Consistency Consistency
National and international infant feeding guidelines National and international infant feeding guidelines that recommend breastfeeding as the optimal source that recommend breastfeeding as the optimal source of nutrition during infancy of nutrition during infancy
andandThe growth charts recommended for assessing the The growth charts recommended for assessing the
pattern of infant growthpattern of infant growth
NoNo
giftgift
isis
moremore
preciousprecious
BreastfeedingBreastfeeding
• provides perfect nutrition
• provides initial immunization
• prevents diarrhoea
• maximizes a child’s physical
and intellectual potential
• supports food security
• bonds mother and child
• helps birth spacing
• benefits maternal health
• saves money
• is environment-friendly
Severe malnutrition Severe malnutrition
Very low weight/height (Very low weight/height (--3SD)3SD)
19 million preschool age children19 million preschool age children
Mortality risk 9.4 times higher Mortality risk 9.4 times higher
WHO standards impact:WHO standards impact:-- shorter durations of treatmentshorter durations of treatment-- greater rates of recovery greater rates of recovery -- less need for inpatient careless need for inpatient care-- fewer deaths (WHO standards better fewer deaths (WHO standards better predictor of risk of mortality)predictor of risk of mortality)-- the standards have had a profound the standards have had a profound impact on the way programs operateimpact on the way programs operate
Source: Isanaka et al. Pediatrics 2009 and other recent papers
The WHO standards will play a key role in the early identification of childhood overweight and obesity
WHO Child Growth Standards
Source: vanDijk CE, Innis SM. Growth-curve standards and the assessment of early excess weight gain in infancy. Pediatrics (2009)
Nash RD et al. Field testing of the WHO standards: assessment of undernutrition and overnutrition and usefulness of BMI. JPEN 2008;32:145-53.
Comparison of WHO with British 1990 BMIComparison of WHO with British 1990 BMI--forfor--age zage z--scores for boysscores for boys
Source: WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height and body mass index-for-age: Methods and development. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006.
Age (months)
Bod
y M
ass
Inde
x (K
g/m
²)
1012
1416
1820
22
0 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60
0
-1
-2
-3
1
2
3
WHOBritish
Implications for clinical practice
With the WHO standards the risk of making an incorrect assessment regarding the adequacy of growth in healthy breastfed infants, and mistakenly advise unnecessary supplementation or cessation of breastfeeding is highly reduced
Provide a better tool for the early identification of children in the process of becoming undernourished or overweight
Improve management of severe malnutrition
Implications for clinical practice
WHO weight-based charts represent a lower plane of nutrition: fewer infants will appear thin while more will appear overweight/obese
Shift of focus from "failure to thrive" to "overgrowth"
Important training implications (overweight not previously a problem): how should professionals deal with fat infants?
Will require a change in attitude of both parents and Will require a change in attitude of both parents and professionals to a "bonny baby": growing too fast in infancy is professionals to a "bonny baby": growing too fast in infancy is unhealthyunhealthy
A child's right to grow to his/her full genetic potentialA child's right to grow to his/her full genetic potential
Age (days)
Mea
n of
Len
gth
(cm
)
0 200 400 600
5060
7080
BrazilGhanaIndiaNorwayOmanUSA
NeverNever beforebefore a a growthgrowth standardstandard//referencereference has has beenbeen scrutinized in scrutinized in thethe intense intense andand global global wayway as as thethe WHO standards WHO standards havehave beenbeen ……..
andand theythey havehave passedpassed thethe test test withwith a a goodgood scorescore
WHO WHO ChildChild GrowthGrowth StandardsStandards
1990 91 92 93 94 1995 96 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 2005 06 07 08 09 2010
WHA Resolution(May 1994)
WHO Working Group on Infant Growth
WHO Working Group on Growth Reference
Protocol
WHO Multicentre GrowthReference Study
Field implementation
(July 97)
(Nov 03)
Growth Standards
2nd set
Construction and testing of growth
standards
Growth Standards 1st set: Length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height, BMI-for-age and motor development indicators
Growth Standards 2nd set: Head circumference-for-age, arm circumference-for-age, triceps skinfold-for-age and subscapular skinfold-for-age
WHO Expert Committee recommendation
(Nov 1993)
Growth Standards
1st set
WHO Child Growth Standards TimelineWHO Child Growth Standards Timeline
Velocity Standards
Thank you!