dr judy ryan repeating the words of henry lamb

Download Dr Judy Ryan Repeating the words of Henry Lamb

If you can't read please download the document

Upload: mildred-wade

Post on 08-Jan-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

The Nature is in equilibrium theory, otherwise known as Gaia or “The Balance of Nature” was not only disproven but also discredited in the 1970s and was supposedly replaced by Chaos theory……but the Odum Brothers were never held accountable for their fakery…………. Chaos theory states that small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for dynamical systems such as weather and climate, rendering long- term prediction impossible in general. [2] You only need to look at the 2009 Australian National Science Curriculum to realise that Gaia is alive and well and still being taught to Australian students. Chaos theory seems to have been quietly discarded The evidence now indicates that some scientists at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology have faked their data. WHY? Lysenkoism" is used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives bit.ly/tgm-j How did We Get to where We are Today? Continued https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theoryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_nature

TRANSCRIPT

Dr Judy Ryan Repeating the words of Henry Lamb https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7nTIJHX_ec How did We Get to where We are Today? The progressive politicisation of Science which has resulted in the loss of Scientific Integrity all over the democratic world. Early atmospheric science where honest errors occurred Lysenko the Russian agriculturist turned scientist who faked his genetic seed data in order to become Stalins darling but was eventually exposed and sent to the Gulag himself where he died. "Lysenkoism" is used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives. The Odum Brothers were regarded as prestigious scientists in the USA from around the 1930s until they both died in 2002 They also faked their data to prove (not to test) that their hypothesis that Nature is in Equilibriumthe Gaia hypothesis was correct.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LysenkoismFourier Lavoisier Langley Arrhenius The Nature is in equilibrium theory, otherwise known as Gaia or The Balance of Nature was not only disproven but also discredited in the 1970s and was supposedly replaced by Chaos theorybut the Odum Brothers were never held accountable for their fakery. Chaos theory states that small differences in initial conditions (such as those due to rounding errors in numerical computation) yield widely diverging outcomes for dynamical systems such as weather and climate, rendering long- term prediction impossible in general. [2] You only need to look at the 2009 Australian National Science Curriculum to realise that Gaia is alive and well and still being taught to Australian students. Chaos theory seems to have been quietly discarded The evidence now indicates that some scientists at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology have faked their data. WHY? Lysenkoism" is used metaphorically to describe the manipulation or distortion of the scientific process as a way to reach a predetermined conclusion as dictated by an ideological bias, often related to social or political objectives bit.ly/tgm-j How did We Get to where We are Today? Continued https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theoryhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_of_nature The Evidence indicates that the images in the LHS panel are system generated fake data The IACs review of the IPCCs Assessment Report No 4 The term Climate Change is not a testable hypothesis The term Carbon di-oxide is totally misused through the document. It is used in conjunction with the words, tax, price, energy intensity For any geographic region, CO2 emissions are the product of population, GDP per capita, energy usage per dollar of GDP, and the carbon intensity of energy. populationMY BRIEF WORD COUNT OF MISLEADING TERMINOLOGY Summary Points The IACs review of the IPCCs AR4 was damning. I agree. The terms carbon and emissions without their descriptor di-oxide are used consistently throughout the whole document. This is deception by omission. Our democracy is being systematically and progressively weakened by the UN, who are using this misleading terminology in an attempt to confuse and thus to rule us as an unelected government. The evidence shows that the IPCC, UNFCCC and the EPA are peopled and probably controlled by some White Collar Criminals. Why is Australia fraternising with them? Everything I say is evidence based. I merely articulate the results of my own independent research. If there is anything I have said that you think is incorrect pls let me know and I will investigate further and if shown to be incorrect, will correct it.Food_scandal_and_hiring_practice_criticismsasbestos.html Dr Judy Ryan bit.ly/tgm-j Volunteer for The Galileo Movement Thank you for Listening Climate Change, Having a bet either Way The Seventies Global Cooling and its all our fault for emitting CO2 The nineties to current time Global Warming and its all our fault for emitting CO2 https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/1970s-ice-age-scare/http://bit.ly/1Mi8PA0