dr. jennifer mccormick department of education...sig coordinator principal 115 w. washington street...

Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION /4/~ TiJfd/lPl(,/dt,§tJUIRni§l&e&U

August 1, 2017

Dr. Andrew Melin Greater Clark County Schools: #1010 2112 Utica-Sellersburg Rd. Jeffersonville, IN 47130

Dear Dr. Andrew Melin,

Thank you for your recent renewal application for a 1003(g) School Improvement Grant under the ESEA. Congratulations, Bridgepoint Elementary School's renewal application was accepted and SIG funds will continue for SY 2017-2018.

In accordance with your application and available funding, you are being awarded $113,340.00 for the 2017-2018 school year. Funds for this grant period are available from July 1, 2017 and must be expended by September 30, 2018. .. .. - •Federal Program Title I

Federal Agency ·-·· • • • • -~~!S Through Agency ... ·-·· • • • • CFDA Number : , Award Name School Im rovement Grants

Award Number S377A 140015

The Title I§ 1003(g) School Improvement Grant award must be used to supplement the level of funds that, in the absence of the Title I monies, would be made available from non-federal sources for the education of the students at this school. Improvement funds must be tracked separately from all other Title I Grants. Local fiscal agents are to place improvement funds in a Title I account assigned for school improvement (this funding number must not be the same number as is used for the Title I Basic grant award). Because these are school improvement funds, districts may not combine funds into one account, and the amount awarded to each school must be spent on improvement initiatives at that particular school.

We look forward to continuing our work with your team this school year. Please feel free to contact Erin Stalbaum at [email protected] if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Nathan Williamson Director of Title Grants and Support Indiana Department of Education

cc: Title I Program Administrator SIG Coordinator Principal

115 W. Washington Street • South Tower, Suite 600 • Indianapolis, Indiana 46204

317.232.6610 • www.doe.in.gov

http:www.doe.in.govmailto:[email protected]:113,340.00


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION W~ k1~f/i>~,11n£-1n1

Title I -1003(g) School Improvement Grant Renewal Application SY 2017-2018 Cohorts 6 and 7-Transformation Model

Part 1: Grantee Information Instructions: Complete school and district information below.

i.J.i.lC.IJJJ[(_j_l.JZJIMIR&iitli Greater Clark County Schools 15.13.l! Bridgepoint Elementary School

Dr. Andrew Melin

Amy Schellenberg

Jacqueline Diaz

(812)288~4858

$113,340.00

1010

0865

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

I


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION W~ lo~pt,~l:L£...U..C


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 'TIY1ffJf'/f,~·.~·IfffP'EU

Instructions: Please complete the table below regc1r'C:iing w_t-ig \IV'as involvecl \IV'_it~the grant process.

Title Name

Stacy Parker Academic Improvement Coach

Amy Schellenberg Executive Director for School and Instructional Improvement

Erica Hinton 1st Grade Teacher - BLT Member

Alisha Blanton 2nd Grade Teacher - BLT Member

Season Neal 3rd Grade Teacher - BLT Member

Olivia Huggins School Outreach Coordinator

Dr. Kim Hartlage Assistant Superintendent Elementary

Jacqueline Diaz Principal

3

fjJ Dr. Jennifer McCormick Superintendent of Public Instruction DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION W~TiJ~f13gi,u,uPFU

Part 3: LEA and School Assurances

Instructions: Certain terms and conditions are required for receiving funds under the School Improvement 1003g Grant and through the Indiana Department of Education (IDOE). Therefore, by signing the following assurances, the grantee agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations, provisions and public policies required and all assurances in the performance of this grant as stated below.

The LEA/Eligible Entity must provide the following assurances in its application. The LEA/Eligible Entity must be able to provide, upon request, evidence of compliance with each assurance.

• Use its School Improvement Grant to implement fully and effectively an intervention in each Priority school that the LEA commits to serve consistent with

the final requirements

• Establish annual goals for student achievement on the State's assessments in both reading/language arts and mathematics and measure progress on the

leading indicators,and key school categories. Monitor each Priority school that an LEA serves with school improvement funds, and establish goals (approved

by the SEA) to hold accountable Priority schools that receive school improvement funds

• If an LEA implements a restart model in a Priority school, include in its contract or agreement terms and provisions to hold the charter operator, charter

management organization, or education management organization accountable for complying with the final requirements (only need to check if school is

choosing RESTART model)

• Monitor and evaluate the actions a school has taken, as outlined in the approved SIG application, to recruit, select and provide oversight to external

providers to ensure their quality

• Ensure that each Priority school that an LEA commits to serve receives all of the State and local funds it would receive in the absence of the school

improvement funds and that those resources are aligned with the interventions

• Monitor and evaluate the actions schools have taken, as outlined in the approved SIG application, to sustain the reforms after the funding period ends and

that it will provide technical assistance to schools on how they can sustain progress in the absence of SIG funding

• Collaboration with the Teacher's Union, include letters from the teachers' union with each school application indicating its agreement to fully participate in

all components of the school improvement model selected (n/a for charter schools)

• Report to the SEA the school-level data required under leading indicators for the final requirements

4


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION I1u1r1.un.#h,.gtl

• The LEA and School have consulted with all stakeholders regarding the LEA's intent to implement a new school improvement model.

• This application has been completed by a team consisting of a minimum of: one LEA central office staff, the building principal, at least two building staff

members.

• Establish and maintain fiscal control and fund accounting procedures, as set forth in 34 CFR Part 7 and in applicable federal and state laws and regulations.

• The Title I School Improvement funds will be used only to supplement and not supplant federal, state and local funds a school would otherwise receive.

• Prior written approval must be received from the Indiana Department of Education before implementing any project changes with respect to the purposes

for which the proposed funds are awarded.

• Retain all records of the financial transactions and accounts relating to the proposed project for a period of three years after termination of the grant

agreement and shall make such records available for inspection and audit as necessary.

• Provide ongoing technical assistance to schools identified for Title I School Improvement as they develop or revise their school improvement plan, and

throughout the implementation of that plan.

• Coordinate the technical assistance that is provided to schools in Title I School Improvement. Assistance to schools may be provided by district staff or

external consultants with experience and expertise in helping schools improve academic achievement.

• Expenditures contained in this Title I School Improvement Application accurately reflect the school improvement plan(s).

• Assist the school in analyzing results from the state assessment system and other relevant examples of student work. Technical assistance will be provided to

school staff to enable them to use .data to identify and solve problems in curriculum and instruction, to strengthen parental involvement and professional

development, and to fulfill other responsibilities that are defined in the school improvement plan.

• The district will help the school choose and sustain effective instructional strategies and methods and ensure that the school staff receives high quality

professional development relevant to the implementation of instructional strategies. The chosen strategies must be grounded in scientifically based research

and address the specific instruction or other issues, such as attendance or graduation rate, that caused the school to be identified for school improvement.

• The Indiana Department of Education may, as they deem necessary, supervise, evaluate, and provide guidance and direction to the district and school in the

management of the activities performed under this plan.

• The schools and district shall adhere to Indiana Department of Education reporting and evaluation requirements in a timely and accurate manner.

5


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION /ol·~,unP.rH.

By signing below, the LEA agrees to all assurances above and certifies the following:

• The information in this application is, to the best of my knowledge, true. The agency named here has authorized me, as its representative, to file this

application and all amendments, and as such action is recorded in the minutes of the agency's meeting date.

• I have reviewed the assurances and the LEA understands and will comply with all applicable assurances for federal funds.

• I will participate in all Title I data reporting, monitoring, and evaluation activities as requested or required by the United States Department of Education, the

Indiana Department of Education (!DOE), and Indiana Code, including on-site and desktop monitoring conducted by the IDOE, required audits by the state

board of accounts, annual reports, and final expenditure reporting for the use of subgrant funds.

• By submitting this application the LEA certifies that neither it nor its principals nor any of its subcontractors are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for

debarment, declared ineligible or voluntarily excluded by any federal agency or by any department, agency or political subdivision of the State of Indiana.

The term "principal" for purposes of this application means an officer, director, owner, partner, key employee or other person with primary management or

supervisory responsibilities, or a person who has a critical influence on or substantive control over the operations of the LEA.

The LEA has verified the state and federal suspension and debarment status for all subcontractors receiving funds under the fund associated with this application and shall be solely responsible for any recoupment, penalties or costs that might arise from use of a suspended or debarred subcontractor. The LEA shall immediately notify the State if any subcontractor becomes debarred or suspended, and shall, at the State's request, take all steps required by the State to terminate its contractual relationship with the subcontractor for work to be performed and supported by funding from the application.

JacS'lueline Di

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

6

http:ol�~,unP.rH


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Part 4: Achievement and Leading Indicators SY 16-17

Percent of students proficient on ISTEP {Both ELA and Math) (3-8) 145% 165% 142% 165%

Percent of students proficient on ISTEP (ELA) (3-8) 161.8% 175% 161.2% 175%

Percent of students proficient on !STEP {Math) (3-8) 65.7% 75% 54.1% 75%

Percent ofstudents proficient on IREAD (Spring 90.% 90% 75% 90% Test Only) (3):- Elementary only

10th grade EGA pass rate {English 10) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a h/a n/a

10th grade ECA pass rate. (Algebra I) ri/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Non-Waiver Graduation Rate -HS only n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

College enrollment rates- HS only n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

1. Number of minutes in the school year 77,4 students are required to attend school 77,400 77,400 77,400 00

2. Number of daily minutes of math instruction 60 60 60 60

3. Number of daily minutes of ELA instruction 90 90 90 60

4, Dropout rate- HS only n/a n/a n/a n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a 5. Student enrollment number 347 380 366 380

6. Student attendance rate {must be% between 96% 96% 95.9% 96%

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a ri/a n/a

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

I n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a I n/a I

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

7



Oand 100)

7. Numberofstudents completing advanced coursework{e.g., AP/1.B)- HS only

n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

8. Number ofstudents completingdual enrollment classes-HS only


9. Number ofstudents who completed BOTH an advanced coursework& a,dual enrollment cla.ss-HS only


10. Types of increased learning time offered: 2 2 3 3

11. Number of discipline referrals 661 200 212 200

12. Discipline incidents- number of suspensions and/or expulsion

SUS-- 62 EXP--0

SUS-40 EXP-- 0

SUS49 EXP-- 0

SUS-40 EXP0

SUSEXP

SUSEXP-

SUS-EXP

SUS-EXP-

SUS-EXP-

SUSEXP

SUS-EXP

SUS-EXP

SUS-EXP-

13. Truants- number of unduplicated students who have received truancy letters or action, enter as a whole number 0 0 0 0

14. Distribution of teacher performance level on LEA's teacher evaluation system

IN--0 IMP-0 EFF-- 88% HEFF--12%

IN--0 IMP-0 EFF90% HEFF-10%

IN--0 IMP-0 EFF--92

% HEFF-8%

IN-IMP-EFFHEFF -

IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF-

IN-IMPEFF-HEFF-

IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF-

INIMP-EFFHEFF-

IN-IMPEFFHEFF~

IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF-

IN-IMP-EFF-HEFF

INIMP-EFF-HEFF-

IN-IMP-EFFHEFF-

15. Teacher attendance rate {must be a % between Oand 100) 96% 96% 96% 97%

16. Teacher retention rate (must be a % between 0 and 100) 80% 95% 91% 95%

8


DEPARTMENT OF.EDUCATION

Part 5: Analysis and Outcomes Instructions: SIOT Activity: (Strengths, Improvements, Opportunities, and Threats) • List school's primary strengths and weaknesses from SY 16-17-forces or barriers working for and against SIG implementation or school's mission • List school's key opportunities and threats from SY 16-17-political, economic, social, technological, demographic, or legal trends that are or may impact school's

ability to achieve SIG implementation or school's mission. • What are the projected outcomes for SY 17-18 after completing the SIOT Analysis? Are there any opportunities we can take advantage of because of a strength?

Are there any threats compounded by a weakness?

Strengths: • Implementation of level literacy groups • Greater participation by parents • Staff growth in developing relationships with students and redirecting

classroom behavior • Small group instruction in order to differentiate for student needs • Staff understanding of de-escalation strategies • Students utilizing skills for self help and regulation resulting in fewer

discipline referrals and loss of time in classroom

Opportunities: • Increasing the rigor of the classroom based activities • Increasing the student independence for academic tasks • Strong relationships with families and greater commitment by

community partners to support Bridgepoint in all areas • Decreased behavior issues • Gaps in academic achievement decrease and overall achievement

increases • Decrease in barriers to academic achievement

Areas of Improvement: • Better use of data collected to evaluate instructional practices and help

better meet the student academic needs • Tier l of PRIDE program --- utilizing school wide class dojo • Balanced Math framework and inconsistent instruction in numeracy

Threats: • Teacher frustration when progress is slow • PB1S implementation being too rigorous • Students learn procedures for math, but not gaining foundational number

sense

9


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION #n,·~UfJM~II,

• Bridgepoint Elementary School projects that through the continued implementation of the School Improvement grant we will gain a deeper understanding of the ELA Guided Reading framework and the implementation of more rigorous independent activities, a greater understanding of reflective data analysis leading to changes in instructional practices, and the abiliiy to increase parental involvement in our school. The continued focus on ELA Guided Reading Framework and Balanced Mathematics as well as targeting positive parental outreach will improve the school's learning culture.

10


7DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION ·#tt.··.~HfJP'TUruunrn

Part 6: SIG Implementation SY 2017-2018

Instructions: !DOE has aligned the renewal application with Transformation principles and required/recommended interventions in column one below as Focus Areas. Please complete the entire table and align your SY17-18 action steps.

SAMPLE: SAMPLE: Meadows School will provide before and after SAMPLE: SAMPLE: SAMPLE: The Crunch Time program will be. Increase learning time school opportunities for all students to help increase Multiple $5,000 tracked using a google spreadsheet to document

student achievement called, Crunch Time. Person Phases Stipends what before/after school program students Responsible: Ms. Smith, Title I Interventionist {Multiple attended. This data will be compared to student

Quarters) achievement data.

Develop School 1) leadership Implement process and guidelines for Ql-4. I s1s,ooo 1-leadership Leadership reviewing Transformation Principal effectiveness prior to Effectiveness full implementation 10 days supporting systems of

1) Analysis of Data: District, Principal and leadership. Technical Assistance Provider will use critical

indicators from Principal Effectiveness.and Mentor: Dr. Rhonda Roos implementation data [implementation gauge; $1,500/day walkthrough observations; artifacts] to identify

strengths and areas for additional support The Principal will develop an action plan 2) Feedback and Plan for Improvement based on for 30, 60, 90, 120, 185, 200 days

DataWise 8-Step Process: Establish tools and outlining objectives for Curriculum, milestones for accomplishing goals Instruction, Assessment, Professional

Development and Operations Management.

11


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , "•~'·" >2c{i... f-fr.A3fh•;,,.::,,t



team and increase their capacity as a viable

member

4) Implement continuous school improvement process with consistency and integrity:

DataWise 8-Step Process: a} Step 1: Organize for Collaborative Work

b) Step 2: Build Assessment Literacy

c) Step 3.: Create Data Overview

d) Step 4: Dig into Data

e) Step 5: Examine Instruction

f) Step 6 : Develop Action Plan

g) Step 7: Plan to Assess Progress h) Step 8: Act and Assess

[

Ql-4 No SIG Funds Local Funds

4-Continuous Improvement Process

Completed PL221 Plan

Develop Teacher Implement system for supporting teacher Ql-4 $450for3 Professional dialogue resulting from classroom Effectiveness effectiveness:

1) Teachers will adhere to belief statements regarding teaching children from poverty that

were previously developed as the foundation for

instruction. [Certified Staff]

2) Use RISE Teacher Evaluation system that

includes student growth as a factor

substitute teachers to cover classes while teachers conduct walkthroughs and hold facilitated

walkthroughs will be documented and reviewed to determine adjustments required to professional development offerings/support.

13


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION VVIY'lRlll'll,.,~-'f1-2·~T.2."•../til#l.>

discussions

Implement Comprehensive Instructional Reform Strategies

Provide incentives for highly effective teachers 1) Provide opportunities for leadership growth 2) Provide weekly scheduled collaboration time

for staff

3) Provide weekly job-embedded PD

4) Provide weekly observation/ feedback based on implementation gauge aligned to core

strategies

Implement an instructional framework based on key elements of lesson design that includes: • Culturally responsive texts will be used in classrooms

in order to ensure students are reading.from authentic

texts during the release or "You do" step of the GRR

model. [Principal, AIC]

• Teachers will plan instructional units in both ELA and

Math, aligned to the INCRRS, based on the Gradual

Release of Responsibility model. Units will follow the

pacing of standards prescribed by the district.

[Principal, Certified Staff]

• Teachers will utilize rigorous technology resources (IXL Math and RAZ Kids) to differentiate instruction for

student needs in both ELA and Math.

• Teachers will implement independent reading in each grade level to build reading stamina and reading

motivation. Accountability for students during

Ql-4

Q1-4

No SIG Funds Local Funds

No SIG Funds Local Funds

Identified Highly Effective Teachers will be provided with first rights of refusal for leadership position and district professional development training opportunities.

Teacher lesson plans will reflect instructional framework components.

14



independent reading are expected to be rigorous and

consistent. [Principal, Certified Staff]

• Through the Balanced Math framework, grade level

teams are expected to address the needs of students

not meeting mastery of INCCRS by remediating and

re-teaching.

Implement on-going PD targeting best practices Ql-4 $950 (1 staff Ron Clark Academy determined by observation data and student members at Teachers attending Ron Clark Academy will achievement: $900 per provide follow-up professional development to • Teachers will attend the two-day educator workshop in person to staff.

Atlanta, Georgia at the Ron Clark Academy. The Ron register for Clark Academy focuses on engagement and motivation the 2-day Building Leadership Team will develop action of all students, with a focus on at-risk students. Six educator plan on increasing student engagement from

teachers will attend each school year until all teachers workshop) strategies learned at Ron Clark Academy.

have attended. $S0(pay portion of travel expenses}

15



• Teachers are expected to implement the Balanced Ql-4 Stipends for Balanced Math

Math framework during their math blocks, including a Balance Math Teacher Lesson Plans will reflect Balanced Math

Daily Math Review. [Principal, Balanced Math Trainer, PD (25 framework including Daily Math Review.

Certified Staff] teachers x $200x2 Student DMRassessment data will be reviewed sessions= to influence instructional adjustments. $3,000)

Walkthrough data will be used to monitor strategy implementation and shared during collaboration periods.

Ql-4 $2,000for Continuous Improvement Implement appropriate PD to supportstaff in reflecting, supplies for Common Quarter Assessment Data, Benchmark revising and evaluating classroom practices to improve data Data, and State Assessment Data will be learning outcomes: binders-{bind reviewed and documented to drive the school's • Organizing for collaborative work ers, paper, PL221 Improvement plan. • DataWise 8-Step Process dividers, flash • Talking about Data drives)

• Using data to inform Instruction [assessment literacy]

• Making our data visible [knowing what to celebrate and what challenges we continue to

Stipends for Quarterly

face] Data Dinners (food not provided through grant funds) $9,000

Increase Learning Student Learning Time Ql-4 SIG Funding Point of contact data will be collected and Time • An Outreach Coordinator will establish resources for noted in analyzed quarterly to determine number of

under-resourced families and connect families with Community families reached through outreach program.

needed resources. [Principal, SAM] Outreach Student data will also be reviewed to Section of

16

Dr. Jennifer McCormick

Teachers will provide tutoring for two hours each• week to students participating in CIS after school care program. [Outreach Coordinator, Tutors]

• Summer Read and Feed Program - available to ALL students

Q1-4

Summer

Renewal Application

$12,800 to pay 4 teachers $50 per hour for 2 hours per week for tutoring services (based on 32 weeks)

$1,000for materials (st udent notebooks, folders, take-home books.

$10,SOOto pay3 teachers for summer read and feed program ($50 average/hou r / 4 hours/18 days)

determine impact of outreach and extended learning

Student data folders will be reviewed quarterly to determine impact of tutoring.

Student data folders will be reviewed at end of summer program to determine reading level growth of student participants in read and feed program.

17

---------------------------------------------------------------------=,~-~, _,w _.,,_,_______________



$3,600 Summer buses($200/ day/3 days/3 buses)

$3,940 Student take home Books for Summer Read and Feed Grant

Create Implement culturally competent programs to increase Q1-4 $50,000 salary The Outreach Coordinator will establish Community-Oriented family and community engagement: and benefits resources for Bridgepoint, such as a food pantry Schools Parent workshops using the Parenting with Love and• and a clothes closet. The Outreach Coordinator

Logic curriculum will be presented each month by will also assist with the planning and promoting

the Outreach Coordinator. of the monthly parenting workshops. The

Teachers will be asked to attend 4 of these• workshops in order to facilitate discussions and

Outreach Coordinator will report directly to the SAM. In an effort to build capacity in working with

network with parents. [Outreach Coordinator, SAM, parents among staff, Love and Logic will provide 4 Certified Staff] $1600 (Travel a common foundation for staff when talking to Implement annual survey to collect input about • to National parents about establishing boundaries and topics of interest and how those topics might be Social Worker routines at home. Parenting with Love and Logic accessible for them [i.e. onsite; webinars; flexible -March, 2018 includes a curriculum with presentation times] in Columbus materials for staff to use for presenting parent

Implement evaluation to monitor the family • engagement activities to inform programs and

OH Registration:

workshops. The entire curriculum can be used through the course of a school year, or specific

improve family engagement

Implement plan for disseminating student progress • $700/ Travel $700

parts can be pulled in response to a need within our parent community.

and how the school is meeting goals [i.e., share PerDiem areas of challenge] $200

18


DEPARTMENTOF EDUCATION

Provide Operational Flexibility

Implement "flexibility" plan identifying and describing guidelines and activities to sustain the Transformation model at Bridgepoint Elementary School: 1) Align flexibility plan w/ Principal Effectiveness

System to specific indicators for the Transformation

Leader

2) Flexibility Plan will include: [i.e., calendars; PD; staffing]• Teachers will spend a c:iay planning• collaboratively with grade level team prior to the

beginning of the school year, and using data

from the prior end of school year. Planning will

include, but is not limited to, gathering data

from previous end of school year assessments

and forming intervention groups for reading.

3) Ongoing, technical assistance Bridgepoint will

receive to support the implementation of the

Transformation model

4) Schedule of monthly District/ Transformation

Leader/ Mentor meetings and focus

1) Specific indicators and data for each meeting

[milestones]

Ql-4 No SIG Funds

Leading Indicators and Data Dashboards will be monitored 3x/quarter

Sustain Support Analysis of Flexibility and Sustainability Plan Implementation Data-Executive Director for School/Instructional Improvement and BLT]

Ql-4 No SIG Funds

Leading Indicators and Data Dashboards will be monitored 3x/quarter

19


DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION lA./u,..,.., SWJ1A



Part 8: Budget SY 17-18

Instructions: The budget will be completed in a separate Excel workbook for SY 2017-2018, and must include any changes from the original budget submission. Once approved by IDOE, will serve as the operating budget for the duration of the school year, unless otherwise amended and approved by IDOE.

21

Expenditure

Number Account

Account

11000 Instruction [9]

support Services21000 1 Student [10] Improvement of

Instruction 22100 I (Professional

Development) __lU

22900 I Other Support Services [12]

Refund of 25191 I Revenue [13] Operation &26000 Maintenance [ 14]

27000 Transportation

Community 33000 I Service

Operations [15]

Transfers60100 I (interfund) [16] Column Totals

Cert Non Cert $ $ 3,800.00

$ 3,000.00 $ 15,450.00$ 9,000.00

$ 40,000.00 $ 10,000.00

$ 2s,ooo.ool_$ 40,000.oo_U ~soo.oo_JJ; JQ,ooo.ooJJ 11,450.oo

Rentals [2]

I $ Indirect Cost: Subtract the amount above $251000

Total Available for Indirect Costs: Amount ofindirect Cost to be used: Grand Total After Indirect Cost: I $ 113,340.00

$

$

$

950.00 I $

3,600.00

1,600.00

2,000.00

Property [5] , ,,.,____,.__ rn I Line Totals

$ 27,740.00 - $ -

$ 30,400.00

- $ -$ -$

$ 3,600.00

$ 51,600.00

$ $ 113,340.006,150.00ll__i,_940.00 I $ $

illTI DIRECTIONS: Provide a narrative below on how funding is allocated. E.g. Other Purchase Services: $1,500-- PD for mentor teachers to attend New Tech training; $4,000 --administration team attending NASTID conference

Supnlies [17 Pronerty: Equipment/ Technology [18 Materials for Tutoring ($1,000 student notebooks, folders, take-home books)/ Summer Read and Feed ($3,940 for student take-home books)/ Professional Development ($2,000 data binders, paper, dividers, flash drives

Professional Services [19 Other PurchaseServices (travel, communication) [20 Dr. Rhonda Roos Leadership Mentor Travel to Ron Clark/ Bus for Summer Read and Feed/ Travel to School Social Worker

National Conference

Staff Name [21] Staff Position [22] Cert/ Non- I FTE: (24] Certified. [23]

http:113,340.00http:11,450.oohttp:10,000.00http:40,000.00http:9,000.00http:15,450.00http:3,000.00http:3,800.00

Olivia Huggins Outreach Coordinator Non-Certified 1 N N Community outreach services coordinator

Various Tutoring Certified y Afterschool tutoring program

Various Summer Read and Feed Certified y Summer tutoring on read and feed bus

Various Professional Development Certified y Teachers attend afterschool/summer professional development in alignment with , grant activities

Structure BookmarksFigureFigureFigurei.J.i.lC.IJJJ[(_j_l.JZJIMIR&iitli Greater Clark County Schools 15.13.l! Bridgepoint Elementary School Dr. Andrew Melin Amy Schellenberg Jacqueline Diaz (812)288~4858 $113,340.00 1010 0865 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] FigureSchool Improvement Grant U.S. Department of Education Indiana Department of Education 84.377A School Improvement Grants S377A0012001SA FigureFigurefjJ FigureFigureJacS'lueline Di June 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2017 FigurePercent ofstudents proficient on ISTEP {Both ELA and Math) (3-8) 145% 165% 142% 165% Percent of students proficient on ISTEP (ELA) (3-8) 161.8% 175% 161.2% 175% Percent of students proficient on !STEP {Math) (3-8) 65.7% 75% 54.1% 75% Percent ofstudents proficient on IREAD (Spring 90.% 90% 75% 90% Test Only) (3):-Elementary only 10th grade EGA pass rate {English 10) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a h/a n/a 10th grade ECA pass rate. (Algebra I) ri/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Non-Waiver Graduation Rate -HS only n/a n/a n/a nFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigureFigure6,150.00ll__i,_940.00 I $ $ illTI Staff Name [21] Staff Position [22] Cert/ Non-I FTE: (24] Certified. [23]

dr. jennifer mccormick department of education...sig coordinator principal 115 w. washington street...

Documents