dr. jeffrey glennon radboud university medical centre .../media/files/ecnp/projects and...
TRANSCRIPT
Dr. Jeffrey GlennonRadboud University Medical Centre
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour,Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
1
Research agenda FP7 health
Formerly there was a procedure for an annual workprogramme:
•Reflection paper
•Roadmap
•Concept Workprogramme
•Published call
•This will now change to support three different but overlapping 3 year workprogrammes
3
Relevant difference FP7 vs H2020 with respect toprogramming in time
WP 2008 WP 2009 WP 2010 WP 2011 WP 2012 WP 2013KP7
H2020 WP 2014 WP 2015 WP 2016
WP 2016 WP 2017 WP 2018
WP 2018 WP 2020WP 2019
WP 2007
Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7Year 3
Year 1 Year 2 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7Year 3
Strategic Programme 1
Strategic Programme 3
Strategic Programme 2
Strategic Programme: focus areas in general terms for
period of 3 years
4
5
FP7 – National delegates Programme Committee Health
Expert group (National funding agencies + National contact points)
Sounding board group + Liaison network
6
Influence
Europe:
•Project coordinators – scientific officers
•Workshops and Conferences EC
•Scientific advisory board
Nationally:
•Digital Liaison network: comments to Concept work programmes
7
Horizon 2020
• Proposed by European Commission:
• Four Programme Committees:
• 1. Better Society Health, Demographic change and Wellbeing
• 2. Competitive industries
• 3. Excellent science
• 4. Horizontal crosscutting issues
• European Council (Member states): 17 Program committees
• European Parliament: 4 working groups
8
Future points of contact
• Project coordinators – scientific officers
• Workshops and conferences particularly on H2020 topics organized by the EU and national ministries.
• National delegate programme committee (Liaison group)
FP7 vs HORIZON 2020
Research Policy
DG Research
DG InfoSoc
Enterprise Policy
DG Enterprise
DG TREN
Education Policy
DG Education
Regional Policy
DG Region
Health Policy
DG SANCO
DG InfoSoc
2007-2013
FP7 (€ 50 bln)
CIP (€ 3.6 bln)
EIT (€ 0.4 bln)
Structural Funds for Innovation (€ 86 bln)
European Innovation Partnership (pilot)
EU TREATIES
HORIZON 2020
(€ 65 – 100 bln?)
2014-2020
Other EU Funding:
E4all, Cohesion, etc
Joint Programming
Co
mm
on
Fu
nd
ing
Ru
les
9
Across all FP7 domains: top 10 in termsof granted budget
COUNTRYgranted
budget (M€)Return %
1. Germany 4.024 16,4%
2. United Kingdom 3.508 14,3%
3. France 2.858 11,7%
4. Italy 2.057 8,4%
5. Spain 1.721 7,0%
6. Netherlands 1.635 6,7%
7. Switserland 1.096 4,5%
8. Belgium 960 3,9%
9. Sweden 957 3,9%
10. Austria 650 2,7%
10
Across all FP7 domains: top 10 in termsof number of projects
COUNTRY
No of granted projects with
country participation2
007
Succes rate
1. United Kingdom 5.937 20,9%
2. Germany 5.303 20,0%
3. France 4.402 22,3%
4. Italy 3.877 16,4%
5. Spain 3.695 18,7%
6. Netherlands 3.009 23,2%
7. Belgium 2.223 22,1%
8. Switserland 2.075 23,6%
9. Sweden 1.930 21,4%
10. Greece 1.603 15,8%
11
FP7 - HEALTH: top 10 in terms of granted budget
COUNTRYgranted
budget (M€)Return %
1. United Kingdom 532,8 16,9%
2. Germany 512,3 16,2%
3. France 331,1 10,5%
4. Netherlands 283,4 9,0%
5. Italy 236,5 7,5%
6. Sweden 173,2 5,5%
7. Spain 164,7 5,2%
8. Switserland 140,0 4,4%
9. Belgium 120,3 3,8%
10. Denmark 89,2 2,8%
12
FP7 - HEALTH: top 10 in termsof number of projects
COUNTRY
No of grantedprojects with
country participationfrom 2007
Succes rate
1. United Kingdom 525 23,4%
2. Germany 495 22,6%
3. France 385 24,7%
4. Italy 342 18,7%
5. Netherlands 340 26,1%
6. Spain 268 21,2%
7. Sweden 243 26,1%
8. Switserland 233 25,8%
9. Belgium 231 25,8%
10. Denmark 143 25,2%
13
Trends in funding:
• decrease in national funding budget:
• government earnings on natural gas no longer available for funding of research
• development of Topsector policy – potential still unclear / uncertain for Radboud UMC
• increase in European funding budget …
• ambition European Commision and European Parliament: strong increase in budget for
Research & Innovation in H2020
• European Council: some Member States wanted very significant budget cuts, even to
(or below) current level of FP7
14
Trends in programming:
• increase in joint programming of national research
programmes
• to avoid unwanted fragmentation or ineffectiveness
• to effectively tackle societal challenges
• increase in joint technology initiatives
• to achieve greater strategic focus
• combining a critical mass of national, European and private resources
15
Structure of Horizon 2020
• Excellent Science: € 27.8 bln
• ERC (77% increase in budget!)
• Future and Emerging Technologies (FET; ICT incubator)
• Marie Curie Actions
• Research Infrastructures
• Industrial Leadership: € 20.3 bln
• Leadership in Key Enabling and industrial Technologies (KET)
• Innovation in SME’s
• Access to Risk Finance
• Societal Challenges: € 35.9 bln
16
Societal challenges
• Health, Demographic Change and Well-being
• € 9 bln of which € 500 mln for EIT
• Food Security and Bio-based Economy
• Secure, Clean and Efficient Energy
• Smart, Green and Integrated Transport
• Climate Change, Resource Efficiency and Raw Materials
• Freedom and Security
• Inclusive, Innovative and Secure Societies
17
Health, demographic change and wellbeing (proposed)
• Understanding the determinants of health, improving health promotion and disease prevention
• Developing effective screening programmes and improving the assessment of disease susceptibility
• Improving surveillance and preparedness
• Understanding disease
• Developing better vaccines
• Improving diagnosis
• Using in-silico medicine for improving disease management and prediction
• Treating disease
18
Health, demographic change and wellbeing (proposed)
• Transferring knowledge to clinical practice and scalable innovation actions
• Better use of health data
• Improving scientific tools and methods to support policy making and regulatory needs
• Active ageing, independent and assisted living
• Individual empowerment for self-management of health
• Promoting integrated care
• Optimising the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare systems and reducing inequalities through evidence based decision making and dissemination of best practices and innovative technologies and approaches
• Specific implementation aspects
19
Health, demographic change and wellbeing (proposed)
Description level example “Understanding disease”:
“There is a need for an improved understanding of health and disease, in people of all ages, so that new and better prevention measures, diagnosis and treatments can be developed. Interdisciplinary, translational research on the patho-physiology of disease is essential to improve the understanding of all aspects of disease processes, including a re-classification of normal variation and disease based on molecular data, and to validate and use research results in clinical applications.
Underpinning research will encompass and encourage development and use of new tools and approaches for the generation of biomedical data and include "-omics", high throughput and systems medicine approaches. These activities will demand close linkage between fundamental and clinical research and with long term cohort studies (and the corresponding research domains) as described above. Close links with research and medical infrastructures (databases, bio-banks etc.) will also be required, for standardisation, storage, sharing and access to data, which are all essential for maximising data utility and for stimulating more innovative and effective ways of analysing and combining datasets.”
20
Health, demographic change and wellbeing (proposed)
Description level example “Improving diagnosis”:
“An improved understanding of health, disease and disease processes at all ages is needed to
develop new and more effective diagnostics. Innovative and existing technologies will be
developed with the goal of significantly improving disease outcomes through earlier, more
accurate diagnosis and by allowing for more patient-adapted treatment.”
21