dr. billy flowers - possible physiological benchmarks for sow longevity prior to puberty
DESCRIPTION
Possible physiological benchmarks for sow longevity prior to puberty - Dr. Billy Flowers, from the 2012 Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, September 15-18, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. More presentations at http://www.swinecast.com/2012-leman-swine-conference-materialTRANSCRIPT
Possible Physiological Benchmarks for Sow Longevity prior to Puberty
W.L. Flowers
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, N.C.
Developmental Period
It would be useful if there were things we could measure during the
developmental period that provide us with some idea of the longevity potential
of prospective replacement females.
The period just prior to birth is an active period offetal growth and ovarian development.
Birth weight is positively correlated with organdevelopment.
0.24
0.20
0.16
0.12
0.08Org
an W
eigh
t (lb
s)
0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0
Birth Weight (lbs)
Relationships between Piglet Birth Weights and Organ Weights
0.00
(Adapted from Foxcroft et al., 2009)
Small Intestines
Liver
Brain
Some aspects of fetal developmentprobably respond the same way to competition
as pig growth in “crowded pens”.
6 developing fetuses12 developing fetuses
Birth weight probably is also positively related tothe development of reproductive organs.
Piglet Birth Weight (lbs)ReproductivePerformance 2.0 – 2.8 > 3.5
Age at puberty (days) 188 + 8 170 + 6
Ovulation rate 12.9 + 0.6 15.3 + 0.7
Embryonic survival (%) 69 + 7 83 + 6
Birth Weight and Reproductive Performance of Gilts
(Flowers, unpublished)
Birth Weight and Longevity from Neonatal Study
• Study was conducted with 1820 gilts in an 80,000 sow commercial production system.
• Only used litters that had between 10 and 14 pigs born alive.
• Litter size was adjusted after birth to either < 7 pigs (n=899) or > 10 pigs (n=921).
• Examined birth weight categories in only the sows that nursed > 10 pigs (n=921)
Fe
ma
les
rem
ain
ing
in p
rod
uctio
n (
%)
E = EntryB = Breeding - gilts F = FarrowingR = Rebreeding
Effect of Replacement Gilt Birth Weight on Sow Longevity
90
(Flowers, unpublished)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
F1
100
0
R1 F2 R2 F3 R3 F4 R4 F5 R5 F6E B
Production phase
2.6 - 3.5 lbs
< 2.5 lbs
> 3.6 lbs
There probably is a minimum birth weight below which gilts simply don’t have the reproductive machinery to function adequately as adults no matter how well they are managed subsequently.
While most of the follicles on the ovaries are presentat birth they begin to acquire their functional competence during the next 30 days – most of whichoccurs during their nursing period.
WeaningBirth(Morbeck et al. 1993)
Producers have very little control prospectively over birth weight, but
can affect pre-weaning growth.
Effect of Neonatal Litter Size on Sow Longevity
• Study was conducted with 1820 gilts in an 80,000 sow commercial production system.
• Only used litters that had between 10 and 14 pigs born alive.
• Litter size was adjusted after birth to either < 7 pigs (n=899) or > 10 pigs (n=921).
• Commercial farm used pen gestation and had average birth weights less than 3 lbs.
< 7 pigs nursing> 10 pigs nursing
Cross sectionof ovaries from a 17-day old gilt fromlitter of < 7 pigs
Cross sectionof ovaries from a 17-day old gilt fromlitter of > 10 pigs
Fe
ma
les
rem
ain
ing
in p
rod
uctio
n (
%)
E = EntryB = Breeding - gilts F = FarrowingR = Rebreeding
Effect of Neonatal Lactation Litter Size on Sow Longevity
90
(Flowers et al., in press)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
F1
100
0
R1 F2 R2 F3 R3 F4 R4 F5 R5 F6E B
Production phase
p < 0.05*
** * * * * * *
**
< 7 piglets
> 10 piglets
Far
row
ing
rate
(%) 90
80
70
60
2
100
0
3 4 5 61
Sow ParityN
umbe
r Bor
n A
live
11
10
9
2
12
0
3 4 5 61
Sow Parity
> 10 piglets (10.5 + 0.2)
< 7 piglets (11.0 + 0.1)
p < 0.07
> 10 piglets (83.3%)
< 7 piglets (88.7%)
p < 0.05
Reproductive Performance and Neonatal Litter Size
Reducing competition during the neonatal periodenhances early ovarian development which improvedlongevity.
What can we measure during this period to accuratelyassess growth and development of gilts?
Growth Measures R2 P value
Weaning weight (lbs) 0.06 ( 6%) 0.14
Association of Growth Characteristics with Longevity
(Flowers, unpublished)
Growth Measures R2 P value
Weaning weight (lbs) 0.06 ( 6%) 0.14
Pre-weaning gain (lbs) 0.14 (14%) 0.04
Association of Growth Characteristics with Longevity
(Flowers, unpublished)
Growth Measures R2 P value
Weaning weight (lbs) 0.06 ( 6%) 0.14
Pre-weaning gain (lbs) 0.14 (14%) 0.04
Pre-weaning gain / birth weight
Association of Growth Characteristics with Longevity
(Flowers, unpublished)
Pig A Pig B Pig C Pig D
Birth weight (lbs) 2.5 2.5 3.5 3.5
Weaning weight (lbs) 16.5 22.5 16.5 17.5
Pre-weaning growth (lbs) 14.0 20.0 13.5 14.0
Pre-weaning growth / 5.6 8.0 3.8 4.0birth weight
Pre-weaning gain / birth weight
Growth Measures R2 P value
Weaning weight (lbs) 0.06 ( 6%) 0.14
Pre-weaning gain (lbs) 0.14 (14%) 0.04
Pre-weaning gain / 0.22 (22%) 0.001
birth weight (%)
Association of Growth Characteristics with Longevity
(Flowers, unpublished)
So
ws
that
pro
du
ced
6 li
tters
(%
)Interactions between Birth Weight and Neonatal Litter Size
(Flowers, unpublished)
40
30
20
10
50
0
2.6 – 3.5 lbs > 3.6 lbs< 2.5 lbs
Birth Weight Categories
> 10 piglets
< 7 piglets
p < 0.05
*
*
*
Growth Measures R2 P value
Weaning weight (lbs) 0.06 ( 6%) 0.14
Pre-weaning gain (lbs) 0.14 (14%) 0.04
Pre-weaning gain / 0.22 (22%) 0.001
birth weight (%)
Total Growth 0.42 (42%)
Other factors 0.58 (58%)
Association of Growth Characteristics with Longevity
(Flowers, unpublished)
Pre-weaning growth and pre-weaning growth relative to birth weight appear to have positive associationswith sow longevity and lifetime productivity
The best physiological test for longevity would besomething that mimics what the mature sow asked required to do effectively each parity.
LH, FSH
Estrogens
+
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Nu
mbe
r of
Gilt
s in
Est
rus 50
40
30
20
10
0
Days from Onset of Boar Exposure
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Nu
mbe
r of
Gilt
s in
Est
rus 50
40
30
20
10
0
Days from Onset of Boar Exposure
Boar Exposure140 days
Boar Exposure170 days
220140 160 180 200
Effect of Neonatal Environment on Female Response to Early Boar Exposure
Neonatal Environment
Variables < 7 pigs > 10 pigs
Proportion of gilts in estrus 77.0 53.028 days after exposure (%)
Average number born 11.3 10.8alive – early responders
Average number born 10.3 10.2alive – late responders
(Flowers et al., in press)*
*
†
†
p < 0.08p < 0.05
Fe
ma
les
rem
ain
ing
in p
rod
uctio
n (
%)
E = EntryB = Breeding - gilts F = FarrowingR = Rebreeding
Effect of Neonatal Lactation Litter Size on Sow Longevity
90
(Flowers et al., in press)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
F1
100
0
R1 F2 R2 F3 R3 F4 R4 F5 R5 F6E B
Production phase
p < 0.05*
** * * * * * *
**
< 7 piglets
> 10 piglets
22%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Nu
mbe
r of
Gilt
s in
Est
rus 50
40
30
20
10
0
Days from Onset of Boar Exposure
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Nu
mbe
r of
Gilt
s in
Est
rus 50
40
30
20
10
0
Days from Onset of Boar Exposure
Boar Exposure140 days
Boar Exposure170 days
220140 160 180 200
LH, FSH
Estrogens
Gilt
s ex
hib
itin
g vu
lvar
sw
elli
ng (
%)
Effect of Neonatal Litter Size on Response to PG600
80
60
40
20
100
100
0
120 140 16080
Age of gilts (days)
> 10 piglets
< 7 piglets
p < 0.05
*
* *
*
Positive responseat 140 days of age
No responseat 140 days of age
Strategic use of commercially available gonado-tropins might be a way to screen for gilts capableof early puberty without using a boar.
Developmental Period
Graduate Students Undergraduate StudentsDr. Jean Popwell Dr. Chad Smith
Dr. Lauren Job
Dr. Brad Belstra Dr. Patrick O’QuinnJennifer Griffin Dr. Catherine HefleyDr. Kara Stewart Dr. Kyle Lovercamp Dr. Lisa Thompson Frances Turner Kristey Kenney
Sara Shute Nikhol GarbacikShelley Swing Stefani Garbacik
151413121110
98
0
Num
ber
Bor
n A
live
10 20 30 40 50
Litter Birth Weight (lbs)
Relationship between Number Born Aliveand Litter Birth Weights
151413121110
98
0
Num
ber
Bor
n A
live
10 20 30 40 50
Litter Birth Weight (lbs)
Number Born Alive and Litter Birth Weights
2.5 lb birthweight
Market animals ?
PotentialReplace-ment gilts
151413121110
98
0
Num
ber
Bor
n A
live
10 20 30 40 50
Litter Birth Weight (lbs)
Number Born Alive and Litter Birth Weights
2.5 lb birthweight
Replace-ment gilts
3.6 lb birthweight
StrategicCrossfostering
Developmental Period
Periodic assessmentof managementduring development.