downscaling for the world of water ncpp workshop quantitative evaluation of downscaling 12-16...
TRANSCRIPT
Downscaling for the World of Water
Downscaling for the World of Water
NCPP WorkshopQuantitative Evaluation of Downscaling
12-16 August, 2013Boulder, CO
E.P. MaurerSanta Clara University, Civil Engineering Dept.
Extending hydrology to include climate change seems easy…
Extending hydrology to include climate change seems easy…
Estimating Climate Impacts to Water
Estimating Climate Impacts to Water
1. GHG Emissions Scenario
Adapted from Cayan and Knowles, SCRIPPS/USGS, 2003
2. Global Climate Model4. Land surface
(Hydrology) Model
3. “Downscaling”
5. Operations/impac
ts Models
Downscaling: bringing global signals to regional scale
Downscaling: bringing global signals to regional scale
• GCM scale and processes at too coarse a scale
• Resolved by:- Bias Correction- Spatial Downscaling
Figure: Wilks, 1995
IPCC CMIP3 GCM SimulationsIPCC CMIP3 GCM Simulations
20th century through 2100 and beyond >20 GCMs Multiple Future Emissions Scenarios
http://www-pcmdi.llnl.gov/
Impact Probabilities for PlanningImpact Probabilities for Planning
Sn
ow
wa
ter
eq
uiv
ale
nt
on
Ap
ril
1,
mm
Point at:120ºW, 38ºN
2/3 chance that loss will be at least 40% by mid century, 70% by end of century
•Combine many future scenarios, models, since we don’t know which path we’ll follow (22 futures here)
•Choose appropriate level of risk
Incorporating probabilistic projections into water planning
Incorporating probabilistic projections into water planning
• Overdesign for present• Can represent declining return periods for
extreme events
Mailhot and Sophie Duchesne, JWRPM, 2010
Das et al, 2012
Monthly downscaled dataMonthly downscaled data
• PCMDI CMIP3 archive of global projections
• 16 GCMs, 3 Emissions• 112 GCM runs• Allows quick analysis of
multi-model ensembles• gdo4.ucllnl.org/
downscaled_cmip3_projections
Use of U.S. Data ArchiveUse of U.S. Data Archive
• Thousands of users downloaded >20 TB of data• Uses for Research (R), Management & Planning
(MP), Education (E)
Downscaling for Extreme EventsDownscaling for Extreme Events
• Some impacts due to changes at short time scales– Heat waves– Flood events
• Daily GCM output limited for CMIP3, more plentiful for CMIP5
• Downscaling adapted for modeling extremes
Online Analysis and Download withhttp://ClimateWizard.org
Online Analysis and Download withhttp://ClimateWizard.org
• Global and US data sets• Country and US state
boundaries defined• Spatial and time series
analysis• Ensemble quick view• Upload of custom shapefiles
Girvetz et al., PLoS, 2009
Information Overload (practitioner’s dilemma)Information Overload
(practitioner’s dilemma)Little guidance in selection of:
EmissionsGCMsDownscaling methods
Hundreds of downscaled GCM runsMany impacts studies cannot use all of them
How much information is really useful?
Selecting 4 Specific GCM RunsSelecting 4 Specific GCM Runs
Bivariate probability plot shows correlation between T, P
Identify Change Range: 10 to 90 %-tile T, P
Select bounds based on:• risk attitude• interest in breadth of
changes• number of simulations
desired
Brekke et al., 2009
Selecting GCMs for Impact StudiesSelecting GCMs for Impact Studies• Ensemble mean provides better skill• Little advantage to weighting GCMs according to skill• Most important to have “ensembles of runs with enough
realizations to reduce the effects of natural internal climate variability” [Pierce et al., 2009]
• Maybe 10-14 GCMs is enough?
Brekke et al., 2008Gleckler, Taylor, and Doutriaux, Journal of Geophysical Research (2008) as adapted by B. Santer
Discard CMIP3 in favor of CMIP5?Discard CMIP3 in favor of CMIP5?
• Ensemble average changes comparable• RCP8.5 and SRES A2 comparable
Is BCSD method valid?Is BCSD method valid?• At each grid cell for “training” period,
develop monthly CDFs of P, T for– GCM– Observations (aggregated to GCM scale)– Obs are from Maurer et al. [2002]
Wood et al., BAMS 2006
• Use quantile mapping to ensure monthly statistics (at GCM scale) match obs
• Apply same quantile mapping to “projected” period
Are biases time-invariant?Are biases time-invariant?
Biases vary in time, space, at quantiles
R index: compares size of bias variability to average GCM bias
Time-invariant enough…Time-invariant enough…• On average, time-invariant
enough where bias correction works
• But for small ensembles maybe not (locations where biases vary with time differ for GCMs)
Bias correction changes trends!Bias correction changes trends!
• Changes in mean annual precipitation: 1970-1999 to 2040-2069
• Similar effect in CMIP3 and CMIP5
• Some more intense wettening in Rockies for CMIP5
Raw GCM Bias Corrected
What happens?What happens?
Contrived Example (Precipitation): •Gamma distributions
•asymmetry•Obs: mean=30•GCM Historic has −30% bias in SD
•GCM future has +40% change in mean
What is effect of trend/shift?What is effect of trend/shift?Quantile mapping changes shift in mean
+40% becomes +56%-40% becomes -39%5% decrease changes to ~2% increase
But is changing the trend bad?But is changing the trend bad?
• estimated change in precip from 1916-1945 and 1976-2005.
• Where index is >1 BC worsens• Ensemble avg shows trend
modification not consistently bad. Ensemble Avg
Challenges in providing downscaled data for water-resources communityChallenges in providing downscaled data for water-resources community• With >500 projections at 1 archive (of many),
need to provide users with better information for:– Selecting concentration pathways– Assembling an ensemble of GCMs– Using data downscaled appropriately– Interpreting results with uncertainty
• Despite known issues with every step, useful information can produced by this process.
• Bottom line for data users: Use an ensemble. Don’t worry. Revisions happen.
Global BCSDGlobal BCSD• Similar to US archive, but ½-degree• Publicly available since 2009• Captures variability among GCMs• www.engr.scu.edu/~emaurer/global_data/• Data accessed by users in all 50 States
and 99 countries (11 months only)
Source: Girvetz et al, PloS, 2009
A1B Scenario
Visits from 3 Nov 2011 to 27 Sep 2012