Download - Winni Decking Single Particle Beam Dynamics Codes Winni Decking DESY –MPY- HHH Workshop CERN 2004
Winni Decking
Single Particle Beam Dynamics Codes
Winni Decking
DESY –MPY-
HHH Workshop CERN 2004
Winni Decking
Overview
• Introduction• Code repository
– Models used– Programming philosophy
• Examples• Summary
This is a workshop contribution:
The description of methods and their implementation in the various beam dynamics codes is not complete, not always accurate and maybe wrong at all.
Winni Decking
Definition
• Describes the motion of a particle in the 6 dimensional phase space under the influence of external fields
• Linear Motion– Fitting of linear optic functions etc.– Definition of magnets and alignment– Definition of geometry
• Nonlinear Motion– Nonlinear perturbations– Dynamic Aperture
Winni Decking
Point of view
• The physicist who cares only about the methods/assumptions used
• The programmer who wants to implement the newest programming techniques
• The user (also a physicist/programmer) who doesn’t care about methods and programming but likes a well documented, usable, cross-checked code to get the work done
Winni Decking
Program Layout
1. Get the data/lattice into the code - the lattice parser
2. Calculate• Linear optics functions• Tracking• Construct Map
3. Analyze the result• Display optics function• Calculate DA, frequency map, nonlinear distortions
Winni Decking
A legacy of beam dynamics codes
• Many beam dynamics codes written over the years• Here is a – surely – not complete list:
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
Winni Decking
Model – Ray Tracing
, ),,,,,(0P
PzyyxxX
• Orbit vector• Transport through elements
using R matrix• Linear optics calculations• Concatenated by Matrix multiplication • Extended to higher order (TRANSPORT)
• NOT symplectic
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
if XX
R
m,il,iklm
j,ijklml,ikl
j,ijklk
j,ijkfj xxxxxxx UTR,
Winni Decking
Symplecticity
Given a transfer Map
And its Jacobian
J is symplectic if
if zz
M
SSJJ T
• A Hamiltonian system is symplectic, i.e. a map which fulfills the symplectic conditions describes a Hamiltonian system
• Important test to verify validity of chosen approximations• If violated, artificial damping/excitation of motion
ib
fai
ab z
zzJ
)(
Winni Decking
Model – Element by Element Kick Code
• Elements described by thin lens kicks and drifts• Always symplectic• Long elements to be sliced =>slow
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
Winni Decking
Model – Lie Maps
• Lie map methods allow extension of linear concepts in the non-linear Regime
• Lie transformation• Lie maps can be factorized and truncated without loosing
symplecticity
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
• Concatenation formulae exist
if xfx
:)exp(:
Winni Decking
Example – Different Transfer functions in BMAD
The computation method used for tracking and calculating transfer maps can be set individually for each element.
Winni Decking
Model – Differential Algebra
• Differential Algebra techniques allow computation of Taylor maps
• Basic idea is to “track” a power-series element-by-element• Taylor Map is again not symplectic but can be used to
obtain factorized Lie map
• AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
Winni Decking
Application of One Turn Maps
• One turn map tracking– One-turn Taylor Map– Construct mixed-variable generating functions– Cremona maps
• Normal form analysis– Extracts higher order lattice function perturbations and
their parameter dependence as well as driving terms out of one-turn map
– Very useful
Winni Decking
PTC-TWISS MAD-X ModulePTC-TWISS MAD-X Module
E. Courant et al, “A comparison of several Lattice Tools for Computation of Orbit Functions of an Accelerator”, published in PAC2003 Portland, shown is x versus p/p for a simple cyclotron. Standard MAD-X gives the green curve which deviates since the MAD-X (like MAD8) uses the expanded Hamiltonian. In PTC the exact attribute allows to the treat the true Hamiltonian. Note, that PTC has read-in the structure from MAD-X input. There is now PTC_TWISS as attribute of the PTC MAD-X module (still rudimentary!) that allows to produce the Ripken/ Willeke lattice functions called TWISS3 in MAD8.
Normal Form MAD-X ModuleNormal Form MAD-X Module
There is now also a NORMAL attribute of the PTC MAD-X module (still rudimentary!) to calculate dispersion, tune and anharmonicities to high orders and as function of delta. This module will be eventually become the replacement of the DYNAMIC/STATIC of MAD8.
Example for the Afternoon
Winni Decking
Programming Philosophies
• Integrate the physics into a high level mathematics software (like Mathematica, MatLab, …)
• Many existing codes can be ‘operated’ from high level software
• Only few codes are ‘embedded’ into MatLab AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD,
ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
• Advantages:– Input/output dealt with built in math functions– Easy implementation in control system
• Disadvantage: Slow
Winni Decking
Programming Philosophies
• Provide the user with a toolbox (library) rather than an existing program which does contain the needed elements and procedures
• Realized in C++, F90, Pascal
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
• Can be tailored to specific problem, should be easy to maintain and extend
Winni Decking
Programming Philosophies
• A more or less advanced process control is implemented in the code itself and allows complicated run logic
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
Winni Decking
Programming Philosophies
• Programs tailored to more or less specific needs• Not universal, but usually the code is not as complex and
allows easy changes• Often only used at only one laboratory and closely linked to
the specific facility and control system
AT, BETA, BMAD, COMFORT, COSY-INFINITY, DIMAD, ELEGANT, LEGO, LIAR, LUCRETIA, MAD, MARYLIE, MERLIN, ORBIT, PETROS, PLACET, PTC, RACETRACK, SAD, SIXTRACK, SYNCH, TEAPOT, TRACY, TRANSPORT, TURTLE, UAL
Winni Decking
Input Format
• A common format for input and output does not exist• A mad-like description of beam lines seems is the most
accepted approach• Much more information on a beam line element needed
– Errors, Aperture, Wakefields, ….– Magnet errors
• Systematic• Random
– Time dependent variation of magnet strength, magnet positions– Correlation between errors important
• Girder motion• Correlated systematic errors
• Attempt for unified input (SXF) Status?
Winni Decking
Input Format
Performance Simulation
Modelling of real machine
construction
Basic Lattice Design
• Simple models (sequences of elements)
• Tend to work with smaller modules
• Fitting, constraints etc. Lattice matching
• ‘Generic’ magnet families
• Definition of basic parameters
• (may have more than one possible optics)
QuadrupoleLK1 value or range of K1 values
(Typical) Life Cycle of an Accelerator Project (from N. Walker)
Winni Decking
Basic Lattice Design
Input Format
Modelling of real machine
construction
• More complex (complete) models
• Tolerance studies
• Simulation of a range of “errors”
• Refinement of parameter specifications
• Definition of prototype component
• Tuning algorithms, diagnostics specs.
• Power supplies (circuits), Klystrons etc.
Performance Simulation
QuadrupoleLPole tip radiusmax / min pole-tip fieldTolerances (used to generate random errors)
(Typical) Life Cycle of an Accelerator Project (from N. Walker)
Winni Decking
Performance Simulation
Basic Lattice Design
Input Format
Modelling of real machine
• Engineering design of accelerator components
Quadrupole prototype (family)LPole tip radiusmax / min pole-tip fieldTolerances Documentation (drawings, cad files etc)
construction
(Typical) Life Cycle of an Accelerator Project (from N. Walker)
Winni Decking
construction
Performance Simulation
Basic Lattice Design
Input Format
• Complete model of real machine
• Used for
• Online modelling
• Continued performance studies
• Tuning studies etc.
Quadrupole QF10 (now unique)LPole tip radiusmax / min pole-tip fieldMeasured field mapOther unique physical attributes
Modelling of real machine
(Typical) Life Cycle of an Accelerator Project (from N. Walker)
Winni Decking
Input Format
Basic Lattice Design
Performance Simulation
Modelling of real machine
construction
(Typical) Life Cycle of an Accelerator Project (from N. Walker)
Input Format should support all stages of the project
Winni Decking
Example – HERA-e Synchro-Betatron Resonances
• Working Point close to integer was found to have low lifetime
• Incomplete cancellation of chromatic perturbations in the two IR’s north and south
• Analytic treatment with perturbation theory by F. Willeke (EPAC04)
Winni Decking
Example – HERA-e Synchro-Betatron Resonances
• Tracking with SIXTRACK– constant initial amplitude in x, y, d– change of coherent tune with arc FODO quads– Frequency Map analysis of 2048 turns
Winni Decking
Example – Frequency Map at BESSY II
• Model incorporates:– Linear coupled model based on orbit-response measurements– Dipole and quadrupole fringe fields– Longitudinal variation of sextupole field– Systematic octupole in quadrupole– Sextupole and decapole components created by steering magnets
from P. Kuske (BESSY) – EPAC04
Measurement Model
Winni Decking
Measurement ALS Off-Momentum Aperture
• Excitation of increasing horizontal beam centroid motion with single turn kicker
• (Static) momentum variation by change of RF frequency
• Single turn BPM’s provide tune of kicked beam (lower figure)
• Beam intensity monitor records beam losses (upper figure, dot size corresponds to relative intensity loss)
Winni Decking
ALS Off-Momentum Aperture
• Tracking with ALS model after orbit response measurement• Beam loss on 6th order resonance reproduced
Winni Decking
Early Indicators – Survival Plots
• Huge number of turns • Early indicators for chaotic
motion – Frequency maps– Lyapunov coefficient– Survival plot
extrapolation– Diffusion rates in
amplitude space
• Difficulty with time dependent process (ripple, events)
HERA-p , 2000 Model
Winni Decking
Beam Dynamics Measurements with Hadrons
• Measurements at SPS, FermiLab, Hera-p, …• Optional control off non-linearity with additional sextupoles
and octupoles• Optional additional application of ps-ripple to simulate tune
variations• Phase space reconstruction with kicker and single-turn
BPM’s• Resonance driving term analysis from single-turn BPM data• Model verified by tune-shift with amplitude measurements
(often difficult if aperture restriction does not allow large kick amplitudes)
• Measurement of DA agrees with predictions within 20 %
Winni Decking
Measurements at SPS 2002
Winni Decking
Resonance driving terms at HERA
• Resonance line amplitudes obtained from single-turn PM data
• Line amplitude can be calculated form normal form theory
Winni Decking
Conclusion
• The ideal beam dynamics code looks like– Library type architecture – Linear and nonlinear matching– Symplectic map tracking through arbitrary fields with time
and s dependence– Normal form analysis– Element by element kick tracking as alternative to the
above• Pre processing
– Connection to data base and control system– Uniform format only important for big collaborations
• Post processing– Includes FMA, early indicators etc.– Can be done by external math program
Winni Decking
Conclusion
• Single particle dynamics is mature field with many available tools
• Codes have been benchmarked against experiments with good agreement if the accelerator model is refined enough
• Modern tools like Lie algebra and normal form should be promoted and used more frequently
• But: For today’s accelerator physics problems the single particle approach is less and less valid:– Beam-beam, space charge, geometric wakes, ion-and e-
cloud, coherent synchrotron radiation, ….
Winni Decking
Model Usage CommentsAT(Matlab) C Spear,ALSBETA S Kick ESRF, BESSYBMAD C,S Matrix, Kick, Lie, PTC CornellCOMFORT Matrix DESYCOSY-INFINITY Taylor, Lie, DA WorldDIMAD Matrix, GF SLACELEGANT L,S Matrix, Kick APS, WorldLEGO C Da, Lie PEP-II beam-beamLIAR L Matrix SLAC wakefieldLUCRETIA L SLAC project startedMAD C,S,L Matrix, Kick, Lie, PTC WorldMARYLIE Lie, GF WorldMERLIN L Matrix, Kick WorldORBIT C particle interactionPETROS C Matrix DESYPLACET L Matrix CERN, World wakefieldPTC C,S Kick World (BMAD, MAD)RACETRACK S Kick ElettraSAD C,S,L Matrix, Kick KEKSIXTRACK C,S Kick WorldSYNCHTEAPOT C Kick (UAL)TRACY S Kick SLS, Soleil, ALSTRANSPORT C,S,L Matrix WorldTURTLE L MatrixUAL C Matrix, Kick(Teapot) RHIC
Winni Decking
EXE SOURCE DOC Optimisation Input LanguageAT(Matlab) U,L,W y MatLab, DLLBETABMAD U,L y y y madlike F90, C++, LibCOMFORT F77COSY-INFINITY y y y mad,sxf C++DIMAD U,L y y y madlike,sxf F90ELEGANT U,L,W y y y madlike CLEGO C++, LibLIAR U,L,W y y n F90LUCRETIA MatLab, DLLMAD U,L,W y y y mad C,F77,F90MARYLIE y y y F77MERLIN U,L,W y madlike C++, LibORBIT C++PETROS F77PLACET U y y n CPTC U,L,W y (y) n F90RACETRACK F77SAD U,L y y madlikeSIXTRACK U,L y y n F90SYNCHTEAPOT F77TRACY C++TRANSPORT y y F77TURTLE y y F77UAL y y y sxf C++