![Page 1: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?
Enhanced productivity – More organic matter is produced which leads to a greater flux through the water column and ultimately greater accumulation in sediments. Sediments underlying high productivity areas have higher % OC and higher C accumulation rates:
Mechanisms: Selective preservation – some OM is intrinsically more labile than others Nonselective preservation – a) mineral protection either inside of or on minerals. Enhanced flux due to ballasting. b) reactive OM moves through the high
activity sediment/water interface quickly . Low oxygen- Less oxygen changes the degradation rate (?) or pathway (?) of C degradation. Mechanisms are not clear, but sediments in low oxygen and anoxic basins have high %OC.
Mechanisms: Anaerobic degradation inherently less efficient than aerobic degradation Anaerobic degradation inherently slower than aerobic degradation poisoning a & b above
12.1
![Page 2: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
12.2
![Page 3: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Relationship between burial efficiency and sedimentation rate
Carbon buried
Carbon flux = BE
Burial efficiency accounts for dilution by low carbon debris (carbonate, silica)
1) Rapid burial moves the C out of the zone of most intense remineralization.
2) Rapid burial “caps” the sediment column and inhibits exchange of O2, NO3
-, etc.
3) Rapid burial often occurs at sites where there is a lot of recycled organic carbon.
12.3
![Page 4: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The effect of bottom water oxygen on burial efficiency
12.4
![Page 5: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The effect of oxygen on carbon preservation in Maderia Abyssal Plain Turbidites
Before… During… and Voila!
12.5
![Page 6: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The effect of oxygen on carbon preservation in Maderia Abyssal Plain Turbidites
12.6
![Page 7: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Hartnett et al. (1998) Nature v391, 572-574
pp on Mexican shelf < Washington shelf; sedimentation rates are similar; O2 is very different
12.7
![Page 8: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Comparison of Washington and Mexican margin sediments
Hartnett et al. , Nature 1998
12.8
![Page 9: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The effect of oxygen has been refined somewhat to adjust for differences in exposure time, which is related to sedimentation
rate (depth of O2 penetration/sedimentation rate) = OET
12.9
![Page 10: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cellulose
Glucose
Acetic Acid
CO2
Cellulose
CO2
How does oxygen act to decrease carbon preservation in sediments?
12.10
![Page 11: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Is carbon more efficiently respired under oxic or anoxic conditions ?
12.11
![Page 12: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12.12
![Page 13: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
If you want to understand why C is preserved in marine sediments, look at where it is buried….
12.13
![Page 14: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Protection and preservation of C on mineral surfaces Larry Mayer and others reasoned that there is no such thing as a naked mineral
surface in seawater. Further, the amount of C that can be loaded onto a sediment particle is proportional to its surface area.
weathering adsorption
12.14
![Page 15: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine
12.15
![Page 16: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine
m = 0.57 mg C m-2
12.16
![Page 17: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Sediments may be overloaded with C due to biogeochemical cycling, but eventually diagenesis will reduce the C load to a set
surface area vs %OC value 12.17
![Page 18: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine
m = 0.57 mg C m-2
Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading
Surfaces are coated with organic matter to the equivalent of one molecule thick…
12.18
![Page 19: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
12.19
![Page 20: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Mineral surface area vs %organic carbon for Columbia River Sediments (Hedges and Keil, Mar. Chem (1995) 49, 81-115.)
12.20
![Page 21: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Surface area vs %organic carbon for sediments from low oxygen depositional regimes
m = 2.5 mg C m-2
12.21
![Page 22: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Surface area vs % organic carbon for Equatorial Pacific sediments
0.05 mg C m-2
12.22
![Page 23: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
12.23
![Page 24: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
enzymes
12.24
![Page 25: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Surface area control on OC preservation in marine sediment..
Weathering introduces new mineral surfaces constantly to the environment.
These surfaces ultimately become coated with organic matter, at approximately a monolayer equivalent loading.
Under conditions that are typical for sediment deposition on continental margins (where most C is buried) degradation proceeds to the ME loading and slows sufficiently there after to preserve this amount of carbon.
In open ocean setting, where oxygen exposure times are much longer, degradation proceeds to < ME loadings. In anoxic basins, where oxygen exposure times are much shorter, loadings are > ME.
Mechanism is preservation in small pores that are inaccessible to enzymes. e.g. physical protection.
12.25
![Page 26: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Is this evidence for or against physical protection ?
12.26
![Page 27: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
12.27
![Page 28: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
But there is the problem with this model…
……think of the δ13C of marine sediments.
weathering adsorption
12.27a
![Page 29: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Surface area vs % organic carbon for deltaic and river sediments
12.28
![Page 30: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Theoretical surface area of a 1 mm pitted spherical particle The rebuttal to surface area control on OC preservation……
It is impossible to physically protect that much organic matter in pits & cracks
Ransom et al., GCA (1998) 62, 1329-1345 12.29
![Page 31: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Effect of high surface area material on total surface area Ransom et al., GCA (1998) 62, 1329-1345
12.30
![Page 32: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Mineral surface area vs %organic carbon for Columbia River Sediments (Hedges and Keil, Mar. Chem (1995) 49, 81-115.)
12.31
![Page 33: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Grain size, smectite, opal, and surface area in Washington margin sediments
Ransom et al., GCA (1998) 62, 1329-1345 12.32
![Page 34: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Correlation of surface area, TOC, Clay minerals+opal in Washington margin sediments
Ransom et al., GCA (1998) 62, 1329-1345 12.33
![Page 35: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
…..and finally the mechanism of preservation….
Mayer-Hedges-Keil hypothesis Ransom hypothesis
Physical protection from enzymatic degradation in
small pores/cracks
No physical protection OM is on surface and only
a small fraction is in contact with mineral.
12.34
![Page 36: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
TOC vs surface are for California margin sediments Ransom et al., GCA (1998) 62, 1329-1345
12.35
![Page 37: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Correlation of clay minerals with TOC in coastal sediments
Ransom et al., GCA (1998) 62, 1329-1345
12.36
![Page 38: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Correlation of clay minerals with TOC in coastal sediments
Semectite rich clays
Chlorite rich clay
SLO clays 21-29% smectite
0-3% chlorite
NM clays 3-13% smectite 13-24% chlorite
12.37
![Page 39: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Things to remember…..
Most OM is preserved in continental margin sediments
Carbon loading is proportional to surface area
Sedimentation rate, or rate of burial may be a factor
Oxygen may be a factor
Minerology looks to be very important
The “mechanisms” of carbon preservation are still not understood. Many relationships between %C, sedimentation rate, SA, oxygen, have been shown, but we do not have a
mechanistic explanation for why these relationships are observed.
12.38
![Page 40: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
12.39
![Page 41: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Westrich and Berner, 1984 Berner, 1982 12.40
![Page 42: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Is the “G” model just and observational artifact?
12.41
![Page 43: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Tabulation of C burial in marine sediments
![Page 45: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Mineral surface area and % OC in suspended particulate organic matter and deltaic sediments of the Amazon River
Suspended particulate matter
Deltaic particulate matter Keil et al. 1997 GCA 61 1507-1511
![Page 46: Why is Carbon Preserved in Marine Sediments?Organic carbon vs surface area for sediments from the Gulf of Maine m = 0.57 mg C m-2 Monolayer equivalent (ME) loading Surfaces are coated](https://reader034.vdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042319/5f08406d7e708231d4211604/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Photographic and experimental evidence shows that organic matter coating onto particles was not even close to an even coverage, that OM is isolated
at very specific sites in blobs or blebs
Larry Mayer
12.16