Understanding What Drives
Employee Satisfaction and Engagement
80 South Lake Ave., Suite 680 Pasadena, California 91101 USA
T: 866-802-8095 F: 877-866-8301 [email protected] www.insightlink.com
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.2
Recommended Minimum Target for
Employee Satisfaction
65%
Recommended Minimum Target for
Employee Satisfaction
65%
Overall Job Satisfaction In The U.S.
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.3
Recent Trends in Employee Satisfaction and Retention
Positive employee satisfaction (defined as those who are either extremely or very satisfied) tends to range between 55% and 60% on a national level in the U.S.
Overall job satisfaction dipped a little in 2009, when the recent recession was profoundly affecting employment and public sentiment, then returned to a more typical level in 2010
Similarly, the tenure that employees currently have and expect to have at organizations have both increased, as high unemployment rates dampen interest in leaving
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.4
Employee Engagement Employee engagement can best be summarized as a dynamic
partnership in which employees bond with their organization and with one another through shared understanding and common purpose
Engagement is a state in which employees are fully involved in their work – physically, cognitively, and emotionally
In a highly engaged workplace, employees understand and agree with the company’s strategic goals, are clear about how their work fits into making those goals a reality, are motivated to go beyond narrow job definitions to meet those goals and are confident that their efforts will be recognized and rewarded by their peers, managers and the organization as a whole
At Insightlink, we see “engagement” as an aggregate measure that is distinct from “job satisfaction”
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.5
Current Employee Engagement in the U.S.
NOTE: Based on an average of 15 attribute ratings (not including Job Satisfaction)
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.6
Key Results Linked to High Engagement Employees have a strong emotional connection with the
organization Engagement leads to higher levels of innovation and
creativity Employees develop better relationships with work
colleagues Organizations with high engagement also see
improvements in customer satisfaction – engaged employees deliver higher quality service as their commitment comes across to customers
As employee engagement increases, so does an organization’s bottom-line success
Between 1998 and 2005, the share value of the “100 Best Companies to Work for in America” increased by 14%, as
compared to 6% for the overall market, even after controlling for numerous external variables
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.7
Additional Supporting Research According to Gallup’s calculations, actively disengaged employees –
the least productive – cost the American economy up to $350 billion per year in lost productivity. Gallup has also shown that engaged employees are more productive, profitable, safer, create stronger customer relationships, and stay longer with their company than less engaged employees. As well, workplace engagement can catalyze “outside-the-box” thinking to improve management and business processes. Gallup US Survey
By a two-to-one margin, companies surveyed in a Taleo Research study reported the largest risk to their company’s bottom line and brand is low employee engagement and productivity. Alignment Drives Employee Engagement Productivity and Retention
Employee engagement and employee performance management truly go hand in hand. The goal for both is to create alignment between the needs, desires, skills and activities of individuals and what the business requires to achieve results. But in today’s intense business environment, what managers and employees need to achieve this balance can be difficult to discern. The Engagement/Performance Equation by Mollie Lombardi, Aberdeen Group
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.8
Key Questions For Today
How should you think about employee engagement within your own organization?
What types of action could help improve employee engagement in general?
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.9
Employee Loyalty in the U.S.
CLASSIFICATIONS DEFINITIONS
Committed Loyalists: Extremely/very satisfied and plan to stay 2+ yearsSatisfied Opportunists: Extremely/very satisfied and plan to stay < 2 yearsDissatisfied Compromisers: Somewhat/not very/not at all satisfied and plan to stay 2+ yearsChange Seekers: Somewhat/not very/not at all satisfied and plan to stay < 2 years
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.10
These are the employees who are highly satisfied with their jobs and have a long-term intention to stay with their organization
They are the foundation of their organizations’ human capital, through the positive contributions they make to productivity, customer satisfaction, the morale of their co-workers and ultimately, to their organizations’ financial performance and overall success
Only 50% of employees in the U.S. can currently be characterized as Committed Loyalists – organizations should deliberately seek strategies to maximize the size of this group
Committed Loyalists
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.11
These employees are satisfied with their jobs but are not deeply committed to the organization in the long-run
As a result, they are both assets and liabilities – they are assets in the sense that they are happy and productive workers, while also being liabilities in that they represent a risk of employee turnover
Their lack of commitment to their organizations means that they can be lured away by other employers
In an improving job market or when there is competition between employers for scarce talent, these employees may leave just when your organization can least afford it
Just 6% of employees in the U.S. are Satisfied Opportunists
Satisfied Opportunists
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.12
These employees are actively on their way out of their organizations, lacking both commitment and intention to stay
They are apt to be less productive than their more committed colleagues and may also be a drag on the morale of those around them
An organization with a large percentage of Change Seekers is almost certain to experience higher-than-necessary turnover costs that will negatively impact their bottom line
As the economy shows signs of improvement, thereby opening up new job possibilities, Change Seekers are likely to actively seek their exit opportunities
Change Seekers account of 17% of the U.S. workforce
Change Seekers
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.13
These are the employees who are unhappy with their jobs, but have no intention to leave
While they don’t directly contribute to turnover costs, they may still drag down their organizations’ financial performance through lower productivity and, in many cases, by lowering the morale of others
More than one-in-four employees in the U.S. (26%) fall into the category of Dissatisfied Compromisers and they likely make a major contribution to the estimated loss of $350 billion dollars a year on employee disengagement
Dissatisfied Compromisers
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.14
Increasing your proportion of Committed Loyalists is central to connecting your HR efforts to your organization’s bottom line
It may be difficult to convert Satisfied Opportunists into Committed Loyalists because these employees are “hardwired” to be on the lookout for new opportunities
Organizations should have a plan in place to deal with the turnover that Satisfied Opportunists can cause
Keeping Change Seekers to an organizational minimum is key to controlling turnover costs
This requires building a meaningful and enjoyable work environment that prevents employees from being disenchanted and, in turn, looking for the chance to leave
From An HR Perspective…
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.15
Decreasing the impact of Dissatisfied Compromisers on the organization – either by improving their satisfaction with their jobs, or reducing their negative effects on their work and those around them – can protect the organization’s bottom line
Our experience suggests that the proportion of Dissatisfied Compromisers is not “set in stone” and will vary in response to organizational changes, both positive and negative
A careful evaluation of your work environment can lead to worthwhile action planning that will shift at least some Dissatisfied Compromisers into becoming Committed Loyalists
From an HR Perspective…
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.
16
Includes job “fit,” sense of accomplishment, willingness to go “above and beyond”
Commitment both “to” and “from” the organization
Commitment
Culture
Communications
Compensation
Work environment, effectiveness of vision/values, application of company policies, understanding of employee issues, job security and work/life balance
Effectiveness of interactions with supervisors, management and coworkers
Basic condition of satisfaction and productivity
Perceived fairness in distribution can be more influential than the absolute level of pay
How Should You Decide What Action To Take?
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.17
The Largest Importance/Performance “Gaps”
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.18
Commitment To Your Organization
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.19
Commitment From Your Organization
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.20
Recent Momentum
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.21
Fulfillment of Mission/Vision/Values
Recommended Minimum Target for
Fulfillment of Mission
75%
Recommended Minimum Target for
Fulfillment of Mission
75%
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.22
Overall Job Definition
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.23
Workload
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.24
Work Profile
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.25
Satisfaction with Overall Communications
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.26
Satisfaction with Compensation
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.27
1. Having enjoyable work
2. Satisfaction with the level of reward and recognition
3. The opportunity to learn new skills and to grow
4. The opportunity to make suggestions and be involved in your work
5. The degree to which the work done is respected
6. Satisfaction with your organization’s operating systems and standards
7. Satisfaction with the resources available to you
8. How fairly the work is divided in your department/organization
9. Having work that makes good use of your abilities and skills
10.Satisfaction with the effectiveness of communications
11.Satisfaction with your ongoing training and development
12.Satisfaction with your opportunities for advancement
The Main Drivers of U.S. Job Satisfaction
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.28
How well are U.S. organizations fulfilling these fundamental expectations of their employees?
Each driver is classified into one of three groups:
Equities (High contribution and high performance)
Opportunities (High contribution and moderate performance)
Weaknesses (High contribution and weak performance)
There is much room for improvement on many of the fundamental drivers of job satisfaction
Organizational Performance On The Key Drivers
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.29
EQUITIES
(High contribution and high
performance)
Work is enjoyable
Makes good use of abilities and skills
Organizational Performance On The Key Drivers
OPPORTUNITIES
(High contribution and moderate performance)
Work is respected
Learning new skills
Making suggestions/being
involved
Operating systems
WEAKNESSES
(High contribution and low
performance)
Communications
Reward and recognition
Division of work
Resources available
Ongoing training
Opportunities for advancement
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.30
Summary HighlightsWhere do I start?
Review key indicators: survey scores, performance reviews, retention data, exit interviews
Talk to your employees – ask them what they like most about working for your organization and what they like least about working there
Consider your organization’s equities, opportunities and weaknesses
Look at what other organizations do well
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.31
Summary HighlightsWhat weaknesses or gaps exist in your organization?
Consider:Advancement opportunitiesTraining and developmentTransparency around promotionsRequirements for successConnection with senior managementTrust in senior managementPay for performanceCommunicationsReward and recognitionDivision of work
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.32
Summary Highlights Positive momentum
Fulfillment of mission/vision/values
Levels of stress
Job definition
Choose one or two and develop an action plan. For example,
Unclear job definitions: update job descriptions and ensure all employees are aware of their roles and responsibilities
Lack of fulfillment of mission/vision/values: communicate to all employees; clarify organizational objectives; ensure employees can connect their work to the objectives
© Copyright 2011 Insightlink. All rights reserved.33
Final Thoughts
Direct action to improve communications, to increase employee recognition in meaningful
ways, to manage how much is expected of employees, to address perceived inequities in
compensation and to reinforce the organization’s mission/vision/values will help raise overall job
satisfaction and reduce turnover, leading to a more engaged and committed workforce within
organizations in the U.S.