![Page 1: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Using the ACCJC Rubrics
Dan Peck
Cynthia Klawender-Lee
![Page 2: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
ACCJC Accreditation Rubricfor Institutional EffectivenessOverview
![Page 3: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Three Areas of the Rubric
Three areas have consistently emerged as difficult for colleges and visiting teams in the past
I. Program Review
II. Planning
III. Student Learning Outcomes
![Page 4: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Purpose of the Rubric
Provide “common language” for what is meant by full compliance with the standards
Increase consistency across college self study narratives and visiting team evaluations
![Page 5: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Additional Guidance
Rubrics do not set new criteria or standards by which an institution is evaluated
Rather, listed behaviors are meant to be examples of behavior that is indicative of implementation stage
![Page 6: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Levels of Implementation for Each of the Three Areas
![Page 7: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
SamplePage
![Page 8: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Real Expectations
![Page 9: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What’s expected?
Program Review
Planning SLOs
Level 1: Awareness
Level 2:Development
Level 3: Proficiency
Level 4:Sustainable
Continuous Quality Improvement
![Page 10: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Program Review: Level 4Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement
Program review processes are ongoing, systematic.Program review processes are refined to improve institutional effectiveness. Results of program review are used to continually refine and improve program practices.
![Page 11: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What’s expected?
Program Review
Planning SLOs
Level 1: Awareness
Level 2:Development
Level 3: Proficiency
Level 4:Sustainable
Continuous Quality Improvement
![Page 12: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Planning: Level 4 Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement
•The institution uses ongoing and systematic evaluation and planning to refine its key processes.•There is ongoing dialogue about institutional effectiveness; data and analyses are widely distributed and used.
![Page 13: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Planning: Level 4 Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement
•There is ongoing review and adaptation of evaluation and planning processes•There is consistent and continuous commitment to improving student learning
![Page 14: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What’s expected?
Program Review
Planning SLOs
Level 1: Awareness
Level 2:Development
Level 3: Proficiency
Level 4:Sustainable
Continuous Quality Improvement
![Page 15: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Student Learning Outcomes: Level 3Proficiency
•SLOs and authentic assessment are in place for courses, programs and degrees.•Results of assessment are being used for improvement.•There is widespread institutional dialogue about the results.•Decision-making includes dialogue on the results of assessment
![Page 16: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Student Learning Outcomes: Level 3Proficiency
•Comprehensive assessment reports exist and are completed on a regular basis.•Course SLOs are aligned with degree SLOs.•Students demonstrate awareness of goals and purposes of courses and programs in which they are enrolled.
![Page 17: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Key Messages
Colleges should engage in ongoing and systematic assessment of all processes
Colleges should have clear and meaningful linkage betweenStudent Learning OutcomesProgram ReviewPlanning and Resource Allocation
![Page 18: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Key Messages
![Page 19: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What do we do with this Rubric?
Use it to guide activities and timelinesWill your college be engaged at the
appropriate level by Fall 2011?Is your program or service engaged at
the appropriate level? If not, what can be done now to get
there?
![Page 20: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
What do we do with this Rubric?
![Page 21: Using the ACCJC Rubrics Dan Peck Cynthia Klawender-Lee](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062517/56649ed45503460f94be4cd1/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What can YOU do?